The Partnership was formed in June 2012 by Susser Holdings Corporation ("Susser") and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sunoco GP LLC (formerly known as Susser Petroleum Partners GP LLC), our general partner (“General Partner”). On September 25, 2012, we completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) of 10,925,000 common units representing limited partner interests.

On April 27, 2014, Susser entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. (“ETP”) and certain other related entities, under which ETP would acquire the outstanding common shares of Susser ("ETP Merger"). The ETP Merger was completed on August 29, 2014. By acquiring Susser, ETP acquired 100% of the non-economic general partner interest and incentive distribution rights in us, which have subsequently been distributed to Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. (“ETE”), and directly and indirectly acquired approximately 11.0 million of our common and subordinated units (representing approximately 50.1% of our then outstanding units). Unvested phantom units that were outstanding on April 27, 2014 vested upon completion of the ETP Merger. See Note 3 for further information.

Effective October 27, 2014, Susser Petroleum Partners LP (NYSE: SUSP) changed its name to Sunoco LP (“SUN”, NYSE: SUN). These changes align the Partnership's legal and marketing name with that of ETP's iconic brand, Sunoco. As used in this document, the terms "Partnership", "SUN", "we", "us" or "our", should be understood to refer to Sunoco LP and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

The consolidated financial statements are composed of Sunoco LP, a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership, our majority-owned subsidiaries, and variable interest entities (“VIE”s) in which we are the primary beneficiary. We distribute motor fuels across more than 30 states throughout the East Coast and Southeast regions of the United States from Maine to Florida and from Florida to New Mexico, as well as Hawaii. Starting in fiscal 2014, we are also an operator of convenience retail stores in Virginia, Maryland, Tennessee, Georgia, and Hawaii. As a result of our July 31, 2015 acquisition of Susser from ETP, we are also an operator of convenience retail stores in Texas, Oklahoma, and New Mexico. Our recent acquisitions are intended to complement and expand our wholesale distribution business and diversify both geographically and through retail operations.

On April 1, 2015, we acquired a 31.58% membership interest and 50.1% voting interest in Sunoco, LLC (“Sunoco LLC”). Because we have a controlling financial interest in Sunoco LLC, our consolidated financial statements include 100% of Sunoco LLC. The 68.42% membership interest in Sunoco LLC that we do not own is presented as noncontrolling interest in our consolidated financial statements.

Results of operations for the Mid-Atlantic Convenience Stores, LLC ("MACS"), Sunoco LLC, and Susser acquisitions, deemed transactions between entities under common control, have been included in our consolidated results of operations since September 1, 2014, the date of common control. See Note 3 for further information.

Prior to September 2014, we operated our business as one segment, which was primarily engaged in wholesale fuel distribution. With the addition of convenience store operations we have added a retail operating segment. Our primary operations are conducted by the following consolidated subsidiaries:

All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Certain line items have been reclassified for presentation purposes to conform to the accounting policies of the consolidated entity. These reclassifications had no impact on gross margin, income from operations, net income and comprehensive income, or the balance sheets or statements of cash flows.

Interim Financial Statements

The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Pursuant to Regulation S-X, certain information and disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted. The consolidated financial statements and notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the SEC on February 27, 2015.

Significant Accounting Policies

Cash and Cash Equivalents. Sunoco LLC has a treasury services agreement with an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ETP, Sunoco, Inc. Pursuant to this agreement, Sunoco LLC participates in Sunoco, Inc.’s centralized cash management program. Under this program, all cash receipts and cash disbursements are processed, together with those of Sunoco, Inc., through Sunoco, Inc.’s cash accounts with a corresponding credit or charge to the advances to/from affiliates account. This cash management policy differs from our remaining cash policies, which are unchanged from December 31, 2014. The net balance of Sunoco LLC is reflected in Advances from affiliates on the consolidated balance sheets.

Segment Reporting. Beginning with the acquisition of MACS in 2014, we operate our business in two primary segments, both of which are included as reportable segments. Our retail segment operates convenience stores selling a variety of merchandise, food items, services and motor fuel. Our wholesale segment sells motor fuel to our retail segment and external customers. Beginning in the first quarter of 2015, we allocated the revenue and costs previously reported in "All Other" to each segment based on the way our Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") measures segment performance (see Note 18).

As of September 30, 2015, there were no other changes in significant accounting policies from those described in the December 31, 2014 audited consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

FASB ASU No. 2015-03. In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, "Interest - Imputation of Interest - (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs." Debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability shall be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The ASU requires retrospective application. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the presentation of our financial statements.

FASB ASU No. 2015-05. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05 "Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement." The amendments in this ASU provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance will not change GAAP for a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the presentation of our financial statements.

FASB ASU No. 2015-06. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-06 "Earnings Per Share (Topic 260): Effects on Historical Earnings per Unit of Master Limited Partnership Dropdown Transactions (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF")." The amendments in this ASU specify that for purposes of calculating historical earnings per unit under the two-class method, the earnings (losses) of a transferred business before the date of a dropdown transaction should be allocated entirely to the general partner. In that circumstance, the previously reported earnings per unit of the limited partners (which is typically the earnings per unit measure presented in the financial statements) would not change as a result of the dropdown transaction. Qualitative disclosures about how the rights to the earnings (losses) differ before and after the dropdown transaction occurs for purposes of computing earnings per unit under the two-class method also are required. The amendments in this ASU are effective for financial statements issued with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We currently are in compliance with the amendments in this ASU.

FASB ASU No. 2015-14. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) – Deferral of the Effective Date," which amends the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09. The updates clarify the principles for recognizing revenue based on the core principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2015-14 amends the effective date to financial statements issued with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, with earlier adoption not permitted. ASU 2015-14 can be adopted either retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We are continuing to evaluate the impact, if any, that adopting this new accounting standard will have on our revenue recognition policies.

FASB ASU No. 2015-15. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15 "Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) – Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements (Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting)." As the guidance in Update 2015-03 (discussed above) does not address presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, Update 2015-15 clarifies that such debt issuance costs may be deferred and presented as an asset and subsequently amortized ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period. The ASU requires retrospective application. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the presentation of our financial statements.

FASB ASU No. 2015-16. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16 "Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments." This update requires that an acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Additionally, this update requires that the acquirer record, in the same period’s financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Finally, this update requires an entity to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earnings by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The amendments in this Update are effective for financial statements issued with fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on the presentation of our financial statements.

ETP Merger

As a result of the ETP Merger, we became a consolidated entity of ETP and applied “push down” accounting that required our assets and liabilities to be adjusted to fair value as of August 29, 2014, the date of the merger. Due to the application of "push down" accounting, our consolidated financial statements and certain footnote disclosures are presented in two distinct periods to indicate the application of two different bases of accounting between the periods presented. The periods prior to the ETP Merger are identified as “Predecessor” and the period after the ETP Merger is identified as “Successor”. For accounting purposes, management has designated the ETP Merger date as August 31, 2014, as the operating results and change in financial position for the intervening period is not material.

Management, with the assistance of a third party valuation firm, has determined the fair value of our assets and liabilities as of August 31, 2014. We determined the value of goodwill by giving consideration to the following qualitative factors:

Our identifiable intangible assets consist primarily of dealer relationships, the fair value of which were determined by applying a discounted cash flow approach which was adjusted for customer attrition assumptions and projected market conditions. The amount of goodwill recorded represents the excess of our enterprise value over the fair value of our assets and liabilities. In connection with the finalization of the ETP Merger valuation, an adjustment of $15.1 million was made to reduce the amounts of goodwill and deferred tax liability, and increase property and equipment.

The following table summarizes the final "push down" accounting allocation to our assets and liabilities as of the date presented (in thousands):

Acquisitions

MACS Acquisition

On October 1, 2014, we acquired 100% of the membership interests of MACS from ETP for a total consideration of approximately $768.0 million, subject to certain working capital adjustments. The consideration paid consisted of 3,983,540 newly issued Partnership common units and $566.0 million in cash. We initially financed the cash portion of the MACS acquisition by utilizing availability under the 2014 Revolver (as defined below). A portion of the 2014 Revolver borrowing was repaid during the fourth quarter of 2014, using cash from proceeds of an equity offering. MACS has been determined to be the primary beneficiary of certain variable interest entities, and therefore the Partnership consolidates these variable interest entities.

The assets owned by MACS include approximately 100 company-operated retail convenience stores and 200 dealer-operated and consignment sites that were previously acquired by ETP. The combined portfolio includes locations in Virginia, Maryland, Tennessee and Georgia. This was the first transaction completed in a series of previously announced drop-down plans by which ETP intends to transfer its retail and fuel distribution businesses to the Partnership. The acquisition was accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control. Specifically, the Partnership recognized the acquired assets and assumed liabilities at their respective carrying values and no additional goodwill was created. The Partnership's results of operations include MACS' results of operations beginning September 1, 2014, the date of common control. As a result, the Partnership retrospectively adjusted its financial statements to include the balances and operations of MACS from August 31, 2014.

The following table summarizes the preliminary recording of the assets and liabilities at their respective carrying values as of the date presented, including initial tax accounting related to the transaction (in thousands):

Goodwill acquired in connection with the MACS acquisition is deductible for tax purposes.

Aloha Acquisition

On December 16, 2014, we completed the acquisition of 100% of the stock of Aloha, the largest independent gasoline marketer and one of the largest convenience store operators in Hawaii, with an extensive wholesale fuel distribution network and six fuel storage terminals on the islands. Aloha currently markets through approximately 100 Aloha, Shell, and Mahalo branded fuel stations throughout the state, about half of which are company operated. The adjusted purchase price for Aloha was approximately $267.0 million in cash, subject to a post-closing earn-out we have estimated at $18.3 million, and certain post-closing adjustments, and before transaction costs and other expenses totaling $2.8 million. As of December 31, 2014, we have recorded on our consolidated balance sheet under other non-current liabilities the $18.3 million contingent consideration, which we based on the internal evaluation of the earnings level that Aloha is expected to achieve during the earnout period of December 16, 2014 through December 31, 2022. Approximately $14.1 million of the cash consideration was placed in an escrow account to satisfy indemnification obligations of the seller and certain environmental claims, pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement.

Management, with the assistance of a third party valuation firm, preliminarily determined the fair value of the assets and liabilities at the date of acquisition. We determined the value of goodwill by giving consideration to the following qualitative factors:

The value of certain assets and liabilities are preliminary in nature, and are subject to adjustment as additional information is obtained about the facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. As a result, material adjustments to this preliminary allocation may occur in the future. An adjustment of $49.1 million was made to reduce the amount of goodwill related to the Aloha acquisition and increase tangible and intangible assets offset by an increase in deferred tax liability. Management is reviewing the valuation and confirming the results to determine the final purchase price allocation.

The following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the assets and liabilities as of the date presented (in thousands):

The Aloha acquisition was a stock purchase transaction. It is being treated as such for tax purposes and any resulting goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.

Sunoco LLC Acquisition

On April 1, 2015, we acquired a 31.58% membership interest and 50.1% voting interest in Sunoco LLC from ETP Retail Holdings, LLC (“ETP Retail”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of ETP, for total consideration of approximately $775.0 million in cash (the “Cash Consideration”) and $40.8 million in common units representing limited partner interests of the Partnership, based on the five day volume weighted average price of the Partnership’s common units as of March 20, 2015. The Cash Consideration was financed through issuance by the Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiary, Sunoco Finance Corp. (“SUN Finance”) of 6.375% Senior Notes due 2023 on April 1, 2015. The common units issued to ETP Retail were issued and sold in a private transaction exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Pursuant to the terms of the Sunoco LLC Contribution Agreement, ETP guaranteed all of the obligations of ETP Retail.

We have a controlling financial interest in Sunoco LLC as a result of our 50.1% voting interest, therefore our consolidated financial statements include 100% of Sunoco LLC. The 68.42% membership interest in Sunoco LLC that we do not own is presented as noncontrolling interest in our consolidated financial statements.

The acquisition was accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control. Specifically, the Partnership recognized acquired assets and assumed liabilities at their respective carrying values with no goodwill created. The Partnership’s results of operations include Sunoco LLC’s results of operations beginning September 1, 2014, the date of common control. As a result, the Partnership retrospectively adjusted its financial statements to include the balances and operations of Sunoco LLC from August 31, 2014. Accordingly, the Partnership retrospectively adjusted its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income to include $2.4 billion of Sunoco LLC revenues and $24.5 million of net income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 as well as $1.1 billion of Sunoco LLC revenues and $28.8 million of net loss for the one month ended September 30, 2014. Preacquisition equity of Sunoco LLC is presented as predecessor equity in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes the preliminary recording of the assets and liabilities at their respective carrying values as of the date presented, (in thousands):

Susser Acquisition

On July 31, 2015, we acquired 100% of Susser from Heritage Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ETP (“HHI”) and ETP Holdco Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of ETP (“ETP Holdco” and together with HHI, the “Contributors” and each, a “Contributor”), for total consideration of approximately $966.9 million in cash (the “Cash Consideration”), subject to certain post-closing working capital adjustments, and issued to the Contributors 21,978,980 Class B Units representing limited partner interests of the Partnership (“Class B Units”). The Class B Units were identical to the common units in all respects, except such Class B Units were not entitled to distributions payable with respect to the second quarter of 2015. The Class B Units converted, on a one-for-one basis, into common units on August 19, 2015.

Pursuant to the terms of the Susser Contribution Agreement, (i) Susser caused its wholly owned subsidiary to exchange its 79,308 common units for 79,308 Class A Units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership (“Class A Units”) and (ii) the 10,939,436 subordinated units held by wholly owned subsidiaries of Susser were converted into 10,939,436 Class A Units. The Class A Units are entitled to receive distributions on a pro rata basis with the common units, except that the Class A Units (a) do not share in distributions of cash to the extent such cash is derived from or attributable to any distribution received by the Partnership from PropCo, the Partnership’s indirect wholly owned subsidiary, the proceeds of any sale of the membership interests of PropCo, or any interest or principal payments received by the Partnership with respect to indebtedness of PropCo or its subsidiaries and (b) are subordinated to the common units during the subordination period for the subordinated units and are not entitled to receive any distributions until holders of the common units have received the minimum quarterly distribution plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution from prior quarters.

Furthermore, the Class A Units (a) do not have the right to vote on any matter except as otherwise required by any non-waivable provision of law, (b) are not convertible into common units or any other unit of the Partnership and (c) are not allocated any items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit attributable to the Partnership’s ownership of, or sale or other disposition of, the membership interests of PropCo, or the Partnership’s ownership of any indebtedness of PropCo or any of its subsidiaries. Distributions made to holders of Class A Units are disregarded for purposes of determining distributions on the Partnership’s incentive distribution rights.

In addition, the Partnership issued 79,308 common units and 10,939,436 subordinated units to the Contributors (together with the Class B Units, the “Unit Consideration”) to restore the economic benefit of the common units and subordinated units held by wholly owned subsidiaries of Susser that were exchanged or converted, as applicable, into Class A Units. The Unit Consideration was issued and sold to the Contributors in private transactions exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. Pursuant to the terms of the Susser Contribution Agreement, ETP guaranteed all then existing obligations of the Contributors.

The acquisition was accounted for as a transaction between entities under common control. Specifically, the Partnership recognized acquired assets and assumed liabilities at their respective carrying values with no additional goodwill created. The Partnership’s results of operations include Susser’s results of operations beginning September 1, 2014, the date of common control. As a result, the Partnership retrospectively adjusted its financial statements to include the balances and operations of Susser from August 31, 2014. Accordingly, the Partnership retrospectively adjusted its consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income to include $2.6 billion of Susser revenues and $18.1 million of net income for the period from January 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015 as well as $169.3 million of Susser revenues and $1.0 million of net income for the one month ended September 30, 2014. Preacquisition equity of Susser is presented as predecessor equity in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table summarizes the preliminary recording of the assets and liabilities at their respective carrying values as of the date presented, (in thousands):

Other Acquisitions

On August 10, 2015, we acquired 27 convenience stores in the Upper Rio Grande Valley from Aziz Convenience Stores, L.L.C. for $41.6 million. The Partnership allocated the total purchase consideration to the assets acquired based on their preliminary estimate of their respective fair values at the purchase date. The acquisition increased goodwill by $4.3 million.

MACS entered into agreements with entities controlled by the Uphoff Unitholders (members of MACS Holdings, LLC, owner of MACS prior to the acquisition by ETP) to lease the property, buildings and improvements of 37 sites that are now operated by the Partnership. Under the terms of the agreement, the Partnership has the right to purchase the underlying assets of 33 of these leases, by paying the associated mortgage debt of up to $54.3 million, and by paying $21.2 million less certain amounts denoted as accrued excess rent. Creditors under the agreements do not have recourse to the Partnership's assets in the event of default on the VIE long-term debt (see Note 11). Because of the variable interest purchase option described above, as well as the terms of the leases, the Partnership is determined to be the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities, and therefore we have consolidated these entities. In determining whether the Partnership is the primary beneficiary, we took into consideration the following:

The assets and liabilities of the VIEs are presented in the parenthetical amounts on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Accounts receivable, excluding receivables from affiliates, consist of the following (in thousands):

Due to changes in fuel prices, we recorded a $205.3 million and a $34.3 million write-down of the value of fuel inventory at December 2014 and September 2015, respectively. Allowances are immaterial for separate disclosure and are included within the “Other” line item.

Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):

Assets held for sale are currently under contract for sale and are expected to close within one year. The disposition of assets held for sale during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2015 resulted in an immaterial gain or loss. These are included in gain/loss on disposal of assets in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. As of December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2015, we had assets held for sale of $1.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively. These are included in other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested annually for impairment, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The annual impairment test is performed as of the first day of the fourth quarter of the fiscal year. At December 31, 2014 and September 30, 2015, we had $1.9 billion and $1.8 billion of goodwill, respectively, recorded in conjunction with past business combinations. The 2014 impairment analysis indicated no impairment in goodwill. During 2015, we continued our evaluation of the Aloha purchase accounting with the assistance of a third party valuation firm. An adjustment related to the Aloha acquisition of $49.1 million was made to reduce goodwill and increase tangible and intangible assets, offset by an increase in deferred tax liability. See Note 3 for the preliminary estimated fair values of Aloha's assets and liabilities as of the date of acquisition.

In connection with the finalization of the ETP Merger valuation, an adjustment of $15.1 million was made to reduce goodwill and deferred tax liability, and increase property and equipment.

As of September 30, 2015, we evaluated potential impairment indicators. We believe no impairment occurred during the third quarter of 2015, and we believe the assumptions used in the analysis performed in 2014 are still relevant and indicative of our current operating environment. As a result, no impairment was recorded to goodwill during the period from January 1, 2015 through September 30, 2015.

The Partnership has indefinite-lived intangible assets recorded that are not amortized. These indefinite-lived assets consist of tradenames, franchise rights, contractual rights, and liquor licenses. Tradenames, franchise rights, and liquor licenses relate to our retail segment while contractual rights relate to our wholesale segment.

In accordance with ASC 350 “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other,” the Partnership has finite-lived intangible assets recorded that are amortized. The definite-lived assets consist of supply agreements, customer relations, favorable leasehold arrangements, non-competes, and loan origination costs, all of which are amortized over the respective lives of the agreements or over the period of time the assets are expected to contribute directly or indirectly to the Partnership's future cash flows. Customer relations and supply agreements are amortized over a period of approximately five to 20 years. Favorable leasehold arrangements are amortized over an average period of approximately 15 years. Non-competition agreements are amortized over the terms of the respective agreements. Loan origination costs are amortized over the life of the underlying debt as an increase to interest expense.

Prior to December 31, 2014, our Stripes and Laredo Taco Company tradenames were amortized over 30 years. As of January 1, 2015, management deemed the Stripes and Laredo Taco Company tradenames to be finite-lived assets and ceased amortization, retrospectively applying the indefinite lived designation beginning on September 1, 2014.

We evaluate the estimated benefit periods and recoverability of other intangible assets when facts and circumstances indicate that the lives may not be appropriate and/or the carrying values of the assets may not be recoverable. If the carrying value is not recoverable, impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value.

The following table presents the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for each major class of intangible assets, excluding goodwill (in thousands):