|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Business overview
GoPro, Inc. (GoPro or the Company) was incorporated as Woodman Labs, Inc. in California on February 14, 2004 as an S Corporation. The Company produces mountable and wearable cameras and accessories, which the Company refers to as capture devices. The Company’s products are sold globally through retailers, wholesale distributors and on the Company’s website. In 2012, the Company established wholly-owned subsidiaries in Hong Kong, Germany and the Cayman Islands. The Company’s corporate headquarters are located in San Mateo, California with additional operational support offices in Hong Kong and Shenzhen, China.
On February 18, 2011, the Company issued 26,839,707 shares of Series A redeemable convertible (Series A) preferred stock to all of its then existing common stockholders in exchange for the same amount of common shares and the common shares exchanged were subsequently cancelled. The preferred stock issuance was accounted for as a stock dividend. The cancellation of the common shares was accounted for as a reverse stock split; accordingly, all share and per share amounts for all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements and related notes, have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split. On February 24, 2011, the Company amended and restated its Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of shares of common stock on a post-split basis from 120.0 million to 150.0 million and approved an additional 36.0 million shares of Series A preferred stock, both with no par value. As a result of this amendment and restatement of the Company’s Articles of Incorporation, the Company changed from an S corporation to a C corporation. On October 27, 2011, the Company re-incorporated in the state of Delaware and changed its no par value common and preferred stock to $0.0001 par value. In July 2012, the Company’s board of directors (Board) approved a 3-for-1 split of the preferred stock and common stock. All share and per share amounts for all periods presented in these consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the stock split (including the February 2011 transaction described above).
Initial public offering (unaudited)
The Company completed its initial public offering (IPO) of its Class A common stock on July 1, 2014 in accordance with the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Company sold 8,900,000 shares and certain of its stockholders sold 11,570,000 shares, including 2,670,000 shares for the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares. The shares were sold at an initial public offering price of $24.00 per share for net proceeds of $200.8 million to the Company, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $12.8 million. Offering costs incurred by the Company were approximately $6.2 million.
|
2. Basis of presentation
The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31, and its fiscal quarters end on March 31, June 30 and September 30.
Changes in classification
The Company has reclassified certain amounts from its previously issued consolidated financial statements. The Company has revised its presentation of certain operating expenses for 2011 and 2012 and has now included $2.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively, in sales and marketing expenses that was previously classified in general and administrative expenses. In addition, the Company has revised its disclosure of advertising costs for 2011 and 2012 to include costs of sponsorships of $2.6 million and $8.2 million, respectively.
Principles of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include all the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Unless otherwise specified, references to the Company are references to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to its allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation, inventory valuation, warranty liabilities, sales returns, web-based sale deliveries at period-end, implied post contract support and marketing allowances, the valuation and useful life evaluation of acquired intangibles, the valuation of deferred income tax assets and uncertain tax positions. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from management’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
Unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
The accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2014, the interim consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the interim consolidated statement of redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 are unaudited. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with the annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2014 and its results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The financial data and the other financial information disclosed in the notes to these consolidated financial statements related to the nine-month periods are also unaudited. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, or for any other future year or interim period.
|
3. Summary of significant accounting policies
Cash equivalents (unaudited)
Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid financial instruments with immaterial interest rate risk that are readily convertible to cash and have maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. As of September 30, 2014, cash equivalents consisted of money market funds and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivables are stated at invoice value less estimated allowances for returns and doubtful accounts. The Company continually monitors customer payments and maintains a reserve for estimated losses resulting from its customers’ inability to make required payments. The Company considers factors such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable balances, geographic related risks and economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. In cases where there are circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, a specific allowance is recorded against amounts due, and thereby reduces the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably believed to be collectible. For all periods presented, the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was not material.
Inventories
Inventories consist of finished goods and component parts, which are purchased from contract manufacturers. Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company’s assessment of market value requires the use of estimates regarding the net realizable value of its inventory balances, including an assessment of excess or obsolete inventories. The Company determines excess and obsolete inventories based on an estimate of the future demand for its products within a specified time horizon, generally 12 months. The estimates used for future demand are also used for near-term capacity planning and inventory purchases and are consistent with revenue forecast assumptions. If the Company’s demand forecast is greater than actual demand, the Company may be required to record an excess inventory charge, which would decrease gross profit. Any write-downs taken establish a new cost basis for the underlying inventory. For all periods presented, inventories were predominantly comprised of finished goods.
Point of purchase (POP) displays
The Company sponsors a program to provide retailers with POP displays in order to facilitate the marketing of the Company’s products within retail stores. The POP displays contain a video display that broadcast video images taken by GoPro cameras with product placement available on the POP display for cameras and accessories. The Company generally provides these POP displays to customers free of charge. The costs of the POP displays, less any fees charged to customers, are capitalized as a long-term asset on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the net cost is recognized over the expected period of the benefit provided by these assets, which is generally 24 months. POP display amortization included in sales and marketing expense were $3.6 million, $8.6 million, $13.5 million, $8.9 million and $13.2 million for 2011, 2012, 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), respectively.
Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, ranging from one to seven years. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the expected useful life of the improvements. Property and equipment pending installation, configuration or qualification are classified as construction in progress.
Fair value measurements
The Company does not have any financial instruments, such as investments in debt or equity securities or derivative instruments that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for its credit facility with similar terms and remaining maturities, and considering the Company’s credit risk, the carrying value of the credit facility approximates fair value and was determined to be a Level 2 measurement.
Fair value measurements (unaudited)
The Company categorizes the fair value of its financial assets according to the hierarchy established by the FASB, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1 | Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to directly access. | |
Level 2 | Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; valuations for interest-bearing securities based on non-daily quoted prices in active markets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | |
Level 3 | Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, the Company is required to use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities, or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets. If these quoted prices are not available, the Company is required to use another valuation technique, such as an income approach or a market approach.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. As of September 30, 2014, the Company’s financial assets included only money market funds, which are classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy.
Leases
The Company leases its facilities under cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases. For leases that contain rent escalation or rent concession provisions, the Company records the total rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company records the difference between the rent paid and the straight-line rent as a deferred rent liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Leasehold improvements are included in property and equipment, net.
Goodwill, acquired intangible assets and other long-lived assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but the Company performs an annual qualitative assessment of its goodwill during the fourth quarter of each calendar year to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry demand, that would indicate that it would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, including goodwill. If events or circumstances do not indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered to be impaired and no further testing is required. If further testing is required, the Company performs a two-step process. The first step involves comparing the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the test is performed by comparing the carrying value of the goodwill in the reporting unit to its implied fair value. An impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value. For the purpose of impairment testing, the Company has determined that it has one reporting unit. There has been no impairment of goodwill for any periods presented.
The Company’s long-lived assets consist of property and equipment and acquired intangible assets. Acquired intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining estimated economic life of the underlying products and technologies. The Company reviews its definite-lived long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset group is measured by comparing its carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted cash flows that the asset group is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. There has been no impairment of long-lived assets for any periods presented.
Warranty
The Company generally provides 12-month warranty coverage on all of its products except in the European Union where the Company provides a two-year warranty. The Company’s warranty provides for repair or replacement of the associated products during the warranty period. The Company establishes a liability for estimated product warranty costs at the time product revenue is recognized. The warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates and the related use of materials, labor costs and freight incurred in correcting any product failure. Should actual product failure rates, use of materials, or other costs differ from the Company’s estimates, additional warranty liabilities could be required, which would reduce its gross profit.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is comprised of product revenue, net of returns and sales incentives.
Revenue is derived from the sale of capture devices, as well as the related implied post contract support (PCS). The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Evidence of an arrangement consists of an order from its distributors, resellers or online customers. The Company considers delivery to have occurred once title and risk of loss has been transferred. Customer deposits are included in accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and are recognized as revenue when all the criteria for recognition of revenue are met.
The Company’s standard terms and conditions of sale do not allow for product returns and it generally does not allow product returns other than under warranty. However, the Company grants limited rights to return product for certain large retailers and distributors. Estimates of expected future product returns are recognized at the time of sale based on analyses of historical return trends by customer class. Upon recognition, the Company reduces revenue and cost of sales for the estimated return. Return trends are influenced by product life cycle status, new product introductions, market acceptance of products, sales levels, product sell-through, the type of customer, seasonality, product quality issues, operational policies and procedures, and other factors. Return rates can fluctuate over time, but are sufficiently predictable to allow the Company to estimate expected future product returns.
For customers who purchase products directly from the Company’s website, transfer of risk of loss is determined to be upon delivery to the customer’s address. The Company defers those sales made to customers who purchase products from its website in the last four days of the reporting period for which the Company estimates delivery to occur in the following period. The Company uses estimates to determine when shipments are delivered based on third-party metrics for average transit time. Additionally, the Company provides a 30-day money back guarantee for web-based sales for which the Company reduces revenue by an estimate of potential future product returns related to the web-based sales, based on analyses of historical return trends and seasonality. Estimates for web-based sale returns and estimates to derive web sale shipment delivery dates may differ from actual results.
The Company’s camera products include multiple elements. Each element in a multiple element arrangement must be evaluated to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is both probable and delivery is within the Company’s control.
The Company has determined its multiple element arrangements generally include two separate units of accounting: The first element is the hardware component (camera and accessories) and the embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the camera delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the implied right for the customer to receive post contract support included with the purchase of the Company’s camera products. PCS includes the right to receive, on a when and if available basis, future unspecified firmware upgrades and features as well as bug fixes, email and telephone support.
The Company accounts for each element separately and allocate fees from the arrangement based on the relative selling price of each element. Revenue allocated to an undelivered element is recognized over an estimated service period. The Company recognizes revenue for delivered elements only when all contractual obligations have been completed.
The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the allocation of revenue. The hierarchy is as follows: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (VSOE), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (TPE) and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (BESP).
i. | VSOE generally exists only when a company sells a deliverable separately and is the price actually charged by the company for that deliverable. The Company does not sell its deliverables separately and, as such, do not have VSOE. |
ii. | TPE can be substantiated by determining the price that other parties sell similar or substantially similar offerings. The Company does not believe that there is accessible TPE evidence for similar deliverables since there are not comparable deliverables sold by other companies. |
iii. | BESP reflects the Company’s best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. The Company believes that BESP is the most appropriate methodology for determining the allocation of revenue for its multiple element arrangements. |
The Company has allocated revenue between its two elements using the relative selling price method which is based on the BESP for all deliverables. Revenue allocated to the delivered hardware and the related essential software is recognized at the time of sale provided the conditions for recognition of revenue have been met. Revenue allocated to PCS is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated term of the support period, which is estimated to be one year based on historical experience. At December 31, 2012, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), deferred implied PCS revenue was $3.8 million, $6.4 million and $7.4 million, respectively.
The Company’s process for determining the BESP for its deliverables involves multiple factors that may vary depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. Key factors considered by the Company in developing the BESP for PCS include evaluating the level of support provided to customers and analyzing the amount of time and cost that is allocated to the Company’s efforts to develop the undelivered elements, determining the cost of its support efforts, and then adding an appropriate level of gross profit to these costs.
Sales incentives
The Company offers sales incentives through various programs, consisting primarily of cooperative advertising and marketing development fund programs. The Company records cooperative advertising and marketing development fund programs with customers as a reduction to revenue unless it receives an identifiable benefit in exchange for credits claimed by the customer and can reasonably estimate the fair value of the identifiable benefit received, in which case the Company will record it as a marketing expense. In addition, the Company offers price protection discounts to certain customers when new capture device models are released and the customer has remaining inventory on hand of the older capture device model. The Company estimates price protection discounts, which are recorded as a reduction of revenue, by evaluating inventory currently held by the customer subject to price protection. The Company records reductions to revenue for sales incentives when the related revenue is recognized.
Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue includes actual product cost, the cost of shipping, depreciation and amortization, warehousing and processing inventory, warranty replacement costs, excess and obsolete inventory write-downs, certain allocated costs and license fees paid to third parties.
Shipping costs
The Company records amounts billed to customers for shipping costs as revenue in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company classifies related shipping and handling costs incurred as cost of revenue in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue is comprised of customer deposits, undelivered post contract support and undelivered web sale shipments. The cost of revenue related to deferred web sales is included in inventory.
Research and development
Research and development expense includes internal and external costs. Internal costs include employee related expenses, equipment costs, depreciation expense and allocated facility costs. External research and development expenses consist of costs associated with consultants, tooling and prototype materials.
Substantially all research and development expense is related to new research and development efforts and the designing of significant improvements to existing products. Research and development expense to establish the technological feasibility of the Company’s products are expensed as incurred. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility and the release of products for sale has been short and development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant.
Advertising costs
Advertising costs consist of costs associated with print, television and ecommerce media advertisements and are expensed as incurred. A significant amount of the Company’s promotional expenses result from payments under event, resort and athlete sponsorship contracts. Accounting for sponsorship payments is based upon specific contract provisions. These sponsorship arrangements are considered to be executory contracts and, as such, the costs are recognized as performance under the contract is received. The costs associated with preparation of sponsorship activities, including the supply of GoPro products, media team support and activation fees are considered costs of producing advertising and are expensed as incurred. Prepayments made under sponsorship agreements are included in prepaid expenses or other assets depending on the period to which the prepayment applies. Advertising costs were $23.7 million, $46.9 million, $55.5 million, $38.7 million and $32.3 million for 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and 2014 (unaudited), respectively.
Stock-based compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation activity using the fair value method, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based on estimated fair values. This method requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure stock-based compensation. The Black-Scholes model determines the fair value of share-based payment awards based on the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the fair value of the underlying common stock, expected volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the stock-based awards represent management judgment. As a result, if factors change and different assumption are used, the stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. Compensation expense relating to employee stock awards is recorded on a straight-line basis in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock awards issued to non-employees are accounted for at fair value. The Company believes that the fair value of the awards is more reliably measured than the fair value of services received. The Company records compensation expense based on the then-current fair values of the stock awards at each financial reporting date. Compensation recorded during the service period is adjusted in subsequent periods for changes in the stock award’s fair value until the earlier of the date at which the non-employee’s performance is complete or a performance commitment is reached, which is generally when the stock option award vests. Compensation expense relating to non-employee stock awards is recorded on a straight-line basis in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company recognizes a benefit from stock-based compensation as additional paid-in capital if an incremental tax benefit is realized by following the ordering provisions of the tax law. In addition, the indirect effects of stock-based compensation deductions are reflected in the income tax provision for purposes of measuring the windfall at settlement of awards.
Sales taxes
Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to respective governmental authorities are not included in revenue and are reflected as a liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Foreign currency
The Company and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. Local currency transactions of the Company’s international operations are remeasured into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the date of the transaction. For those wholly-owned subsidiaries with assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, non-monetary assets are remeasured into U.S. dollars using historical rates of exchange. Monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars using exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Transaction gains and losses were not material for all periods presented and are included in other income (expense), net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Income taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. Management makes estimates, assumptions and judgments to determine the Company’s provision for income taxes and also for deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowances recorded against the Company’s deferred tax assets. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent the Company believes that recovery is not likely, the Company must establish a valuation allowance.
The calculation of the Company’s current provision for income taxes involves the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments while taking into account current tax laws, interpretation of current tax laws and possible outcomes of future tax audits. The Company has established reserves to address potential exposures related to tax positions that could be challenged by tax authorities. Although the Company believes its estimates, assumptions and judgments to be reasonable, any changes in tax law or its interpretation of tax laws and the resolutions of potential tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The calculation of the Company’s deferred tax asset balance involves the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments while taking into account estimates of the amounts and type of future taxable income. Actual future operating results and the underlying amount and type of income could differ materially from the Company’s estimates, assumptions and judgments thereby impacting the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
The Company has adopted ASC 740-10 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” that prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the Company’s income tax return, and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company has not incurred any interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in any of the periods presented.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting standard update on the financial statement presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. The new guidance provides that a liability related to an unrecognized tax benefit would be presented as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2014 and it should be applied prospectively to unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date with retrospective application permitted. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2014. The guidance had no material impact to the Company’s financial position or results of operations in the first quarter of 2014.
On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new accounting standard update on revenue from contracts with customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. The new guidance adheres to the core principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this principle, the new guidance lists five steps that entities should follow, including identifying the contract with a customer, identifying the performance obligations in the contract, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognizing revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2017, with retrospective application permitted. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new guidance (unaudited).
In June 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard update on the accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period is treated as a performance condition. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
In August 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to the disclosures around going concern. The new standard update provides guidance around management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
Correction of error (unaudited)
During the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2014, the Company determined that within the consolidated statement of cash flows previously disclosed for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities was understated by $3.2 million and net cash used for investing activities was understated by the same amount. The Company has properly presented its consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and determined that this revision is not material to prior periods.
|
4. Balance sheet components
Inventories, net
Inventories, net consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Components |
$ | 3,240 | $ | 8,000 | $ | 9,515 | ||||||
Finished goods |
57,172 | 103,994 | 107,499 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Inventories, net |
$ | 60,412 | $ | 111,994 | $ | 117,014 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
$ | 9,529 | $ | — | $ | 25,064 | ||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
7,226 | 15,173 | 14,981 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
1,947 | 2,739 | 4,715 | |||||||||
Deposits |
1,193 | 2,049 | 1,584 | |||||||||
Prepaid licenses |
544 | 1,091 | 1,834 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
1,285 | 915 | 879 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 21,724 | $ | 21,967 | $ | 49,057 | |||||||
|
Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following;
Useful life (in years) |
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
3–7 | $ | 7,595 | $ | 20,111 | $ | 22,342 | |||||||||
Computers, software, equipment and furniture |
2–7 | 4,757 | 11,988 | 20,724 | ||||||||||||
Tooling |
1–4 | 4,197 | 8,799 | 14,860 | ||||||||||||
Construction in progress |
6,356 | 2,151 | 3,790 | |||||||||||||
Tradeshow equipment |
2–5 | 2,308 | 2,613 | 2,792 | ||||||||||||
Automobiles |
3–5 | 717 | 856 | 967 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
25,930 | 46,518 | 65,475 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(3,490 | ) | (14,407 | ) | (25,136 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 22,440 | $ | 32,111 | $ | 40,339 | |||||||||||
|
Depreciation expense was $0.6 million, $2.8 million, $10.9 million, $7.7 million and $11.9 million for years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), respectively.
Goodwill and acquired intangible assets
Goodwill at December 31, 2012, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Goodwill at December 31, 2012 |
$ | 4,233 | ||
Acquisition |
9,862 | |||
|
|
|||
Goodwill at December 31, 2013 |
$ | 14,095 | ||
Adjustments (unaudited) |
— | |||
|
|
|||
Goodwill at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
$ | 14,095 | ||
|
Goodwill increased by approximately $9.9 million due to the acquisition of General Things, Inc. (General Things) in the fourth quarter of 2013. There were no impairments or other additions to goodwill in 2013 or the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited).
Acquired intangible assets at December 31, 2012, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) were as follows:
December 31, 2012 |
Weighted useful life (in years) |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Gross |
Accumulated amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
$ | 5,330 | $ | (1,629 | ) | $ | 3,701 | 4.2 | ||||||||
Tradename |
664 | (243 | ) | 421 | 3.2 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
170 | (104 | ) | 66 | 1.2 | |||||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
150 | (137 | ) | 13 | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Domain name |
15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 6,329 | $ | (2,113 | ) | $ | 4,216 | ||||||||||
|
December 31, 2013 |
Weighted
useful life |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Gross |
Accumulated amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
$ | 5,330 | $ | (2,517 | ) | $ | 2,813 | 3.2 | ||||||||
Tradename |
664 | (376 | ) | 288 | 2.2 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
170 | (161 | ) | 9 | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
311 | (166 | ) | 145 | 1.8 | |||||||||||
Domain name |
15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 6,490 | $ | (3,220 | ) | $ | 3,270 | ||||||||||
|
September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
Weighted
useful life |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Gross | Accumulated amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
$ | 5,330 | $ | (3,183 | ) | $ | 2,147 | 2.5 | ||||||||
Tradename |
664 | (476 | ) | 188 | 1.5 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
170 | (170 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
311 | (227 | ) | 84 | 1.1 | |||||||||||
Domain name |
15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 6,490 | $ | (4,056 | ) | $ | 2,434 | ||||||||||
|
Amortization expense in fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $1.0 million, $1.2 million, $1.1 million, $0.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
The estimated future amortization expense of acquired intangible assets to be charged to cost of revenue and operating expenses as of December 31, 2013, is as follows:
(in thousands) | Cost of revenue |
Operating expenses |
Total | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Years ending December 31, |
||||||||||||
2014 |
$ | 888 | $ | 223 | $ | 1,111 | ||||||
2015 |
888 | 197 | 1,085 | |||||||||
2016 |
888 | 22 | 910 | |||||||||
2017 |
149 | — | 149 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 2,813 | $ | 442 | $ | 3,255 | |||||||
|
The estimated future amortization expense of acquired intangible assets to be charged to cost of revenue and operating expenses as of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), is as follows:
(in thousands) | Cost of revenue |
Operating expenses |
Total | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Years ending December 31, |
||||||||||||
2014 (remaining 3 months) |
$ | 221 | $ | 54 | $ | 275 | ||||||
2015 |
888 | 197 | 1,085 | |||||||||
2016 |
888 | 22 | 910 | |||||||||
2017 |
149 | — | 149 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 2,146 | $ | 273 | $ | 2,419 | |||||||
|
Other long-term assets
Other long-term assets consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
POP displays |
$ | 13,106 | $ | 22,379 | $ | 19,517 | ||||||
Deposits |
1,920 | 2,698 | 5,492 | |||||||||
Long-term licenses |
— | 4,000 | 4,062 | |||||||||
Deferred financing charges |
1,378 | 947 | — | |||||||||
Long-term deferred tax assets |
554 | 736 | 4,736 | |||||||||
Deferred public offering costs |
— | 1,395 | — | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 16,958 | $ | 32,155 | $ | 33,807 | |||||||
|
Deferred public offering costs consist principally of legal, accounting and other fees incurred through the balance sheet date that are directly related to this public offering and that will be charged to stockholders’ equity (deficit) upon the receipt of the capital raised. As of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), $0.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively, of deferred public offering costs are included in accrued liabilities.
Accrued liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Accrued payables |
$ | 33,112 | $ | 49,975 | $ | 45,180 | ||||||
Employee related liabilities |
2,716 | 11,932 | 24,217 | |||||||||
Customer deposits |
1,372 | 1,316 | 3,566 | |||||||||
Warranty liability |
1,734 | 3,691 | 5,138 | |||||||||
Taxes payable |
2,561 | 7,766 | 11,340 | |||||||||
Accrued sponsorship expense |
504 | 2,909 | 1,697 | |||||||||
Accrued sales incentives |
3,314 | 4,909 | 5,066 | |||||||||
Sales commissions |
2,579 | 2,454 | 2,037 | |||||||||
Other |
822 | 1,439 | 1,687 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 48,714 | $ | 86,391 | $ | 99,928 | |||||||
|
|
5. Redeemable convertible preferred stock
At December 31, 2012, and 2013, there were 36,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock authorized and 30,523,036 shares of Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding with the following terms:
Conversion
Each share of Series A preferred stock is convertible, at the option of the holder, into shares of common stock at a rate of 1-for-1. The conversion of all outstanding Series A preferred stock will occur in connection with the closing of an initial public offering, provided the aggregate offering price equals or exceeds $50.0 million.
Voting rights
The holders of shares of the Company’s Series A preferred stock vote equally with shares of common stock on an as-if converted to common stock basis on all matters, including the election of directors.
Dividend rights
The holders of each Series A share are entitled to receive any noncumulative dividends on an equal basis with common stock, when and if declared by the Board.
Redemption rights
In the event of any liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, the Company is required to redeem shares of Series A preferred stock at the original issue price of $2.53 per share plus any noncumulative dividends declared by the Board. If the holders have not previously exercised the rights granted to them, the Series A preferred stock is redeemable within 365 days after July 1, 2017, subject to a majority vote of the then outstanding Series A preferred shares. As the redemption events described above could occur and are not solely within the Company’s control, all shares of preferred stock have been presented outside of permanent equity.
On December 19, 2012, certain Series A stockholders exercised their conversion right and converted 4,211,303 shares of Series A preferred stock to common stock to participate in a common share sale transaction between the Company’s principal stockholder and a new investor pursuant to the pre-existing tag-along right. On December 20, 2012, the Series A preferred stock was modified to eliminate an 8% cumulative dividend and to extend the redemption date to July 2017. The 8% cumulative dividend had been accreted using the effective interest method from the time of issue through February 28, 2016, until the 8% cumulative dividend was eliminated on December 20, 2012. The Company recorded preferred stock dividend accretion of $4.2 million and $3.4 million in the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. On December 21, 2012, a dividend of $1.05 per share was declared and paid to holders of common and preferred stock totaling $117.4 million. The dividend payment to the preferred stockholders represented a settlement of accumulated dividends to date, prepayments of future cumulative dividends and participation in additional dividends paid to common stockholders as contractually provided for. The cash dividend was reflected first as a reduction to preferred stock to the extent that such dividend payments were accreted, with any cash paid in excess of this amount recorded as a reduction of retained earnings until exhausted, then as a reduction of additional paid-in-capital until exhausted, and then as accumulated deficit.
|
6. Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Preferred stock (unaudited)
Upon completion of its IPO on July 1, 2014, the Company filed a Restated Certificate of Incorporation, which authorized the issuance of undesignated preferred stock with rights and preferences, including voting rights, designated from time to time by its board of directors. As of September 30, 2014, there were 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized, and no shares issued or outstanding.
Common stock
At December 31, 2012 and 2013, the Company had 150,000,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance. At December 31, 2012 and 2013, there were 80,714,412 and 81,420,040 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, respectively.
In July 2012, the Company approved a 3-for-1 split of the Company’s common and preferred stock. All share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect this stock split.
In October 2011, the Company re-incorporated in the State of Delaware and converted its no par value common stock and Series A preferred stock to a par value of $0.0001. The carrying value of common stock was adjusted to state common stock at par value.
In February 2011, the Company issued 26,839,707 shares of Series A preferred stock to its existing stockholders in exchange for the same number of common shares previously held. The common shares exchanged were subsequently cancelled. The cancellation of common shares was accounted for as a 26.8% reverse stock split. All of the share and per share amounts in these consolidated financial statements have been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.
On February 24, 2011, the Company amended and restated its Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of post-split shares of common stock from 120.0 million to 150.0 million, and change its status from an S corporation to a C corporation.
In October 2010, the Company converted a convertible promissory note of $0.2 million plus interest of $0.1 million into 7.3 million shares of common stock.
The Company had the following shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of equity instruments:
(in thousands) | December 31, 2013 |
September 30, 2014 |
||||||
|
||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Stock options outstanding |
26,724 | 27,518 | ||||||
Restricted stock units outstanding |
270 | 3,900 | ||||||
Stock options, restricted stock and RSUs available for future grants |
1,306 | 13,403 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
28,300 | 44,821 | |||||||
|
Common stock reclassification (unaudited)
On June 20, 2014, the Company filed a Restated Certificate of Incorporation to establish two classes of authorized common stock (Reclassification): Class A common stock and Class B common stock. As a result of the Reclassification, all outstanding shares of common stock were converted into shares of Class B common stock. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had 500,000,000 shares of Class A common stock authorized and 150,000,000 shares of Class B common stock authorized. As of September 30, 2014, 26,292,404 shares of Class A stock were issued and outstanding and 99,484,734 shares of Class B stock were issued and outstanding.
Equity incentive plan
In August 2010, the Board approved the adoption of the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (EIP). As amended, the EIP permits the Company to grant up to 32,420,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The EIP provides for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs) and stock appreciation rights to employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company. All shares that are cancelled, forfeited or expired are returned to the plan and are available for grant in conjunction with the issuance of new stock awards.
The Board oversees the administration of the Company’s equity plans and generally determines eligibility, vesting schedules and other terms for awards granted under the plans. Stock options under the plan have a maximum contractual term of not more than ten years from the date of grant and are generally exercisable upon vesting. Vesting generally occurs over four years and becomes exercisable at the rate of 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and ratably on a monthly basis over the remaining 36-month period thereafter. Awards that provide for early exercise are subject to repurchase upon the termination of services prior to vesting. The exercise price of stock options must generally be at least 100% of the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant as determined by the Board.
Prior to the Reclassification, the EIP permitted the Company to grant up to 40,920,000 shares of the Company’s Class B common stock (unaudited).
2014 Equity Incentive Plan (unaudited)
Following the Reclassification, all shares subject to the EIP were converted into Class B common stock. The EIP terminated with the establishment of the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (2014 EIP), and no further grants were issued out of the EIP following termination, though outstanding awards under the EIP at the time of the plan’s termination remained outstanding in accordance with their terms.
In June 2014, the Board approved the adoption of the 2014 EIP, which became effective on June 26, 2014. As of September 30, 2014, the 2014 EIP permits the Company to grant up to 13,921,880 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock, which includes 451,651 shares of Class B common stock previously reserved but unissued under the EIP that became available for issuance as Class A common stock under the 2014 EIP. The share reserve may also increase to the extent that outstanding awards under the EIP expire or terminate unexercised.
The 2014 EIP will terminate in 2024, unless sooner terminated by the Board. The 2014 EIP provides for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, stock appreciation rights and performance awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants of the Company. All shares that are cancelled, forfeited or expired are returned to the 2014 EIP and are available for grant in conjunction with the issuance of new stock awards.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (unaudited)
Concurrent with the effectiveness of the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1 on June 25, 2014, the Company’s 2014 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) became effective. The ESPP allows eligible employees to purchase shares of the Company’s Class A common stock at a discount through payroll deductions of up to 15% of their eligible compensation, subject to any plan limitations. The ESPP generally provides for six-month offering periods, and at the end of each offering period, employees are able to purchase shares at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the first trading day of the offering period or on the last day of the offering period
Stock option activity
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is as follows:
Shares available for grant |
Options outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(shares in thousands) | Shares | Weighted- average exercise price |
Weighted- average grant- date fair value |
Total intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands) |
Weighted- average remaining contractual term (in years) |
Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010: |
3,268 | 13,043 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized |
12,010 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options granted |
(14,100 | ) | 14,100 | 0.93 | $ | 1.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock and early exercised options granted subject to repurchase |
(1,244 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs granted |
(270 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
— | (46 | ) | 0.24 | $ | 60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled |
736 | (736 | ) | 0.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2011: |
400 | 26,361 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized |
2,100 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
(1,418 | ) | 1,418 | 5.10 | $ | 5.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
— | (2,486 | ) | 1.11 | $ | 30,605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled |
891 | (891 | ) | 1.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2012: |
1,973 | 24,402 | $ | 1.00 | 8.33 | $ | 310,454 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized |
2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
(2,906 | ) | 2,906 | 15.14 | $ | 8.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
— | (345 | ) | 2.23 | $ | 4,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled |
239 | (239 | ) | 6.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2013: |
1,306 | 26,724 | $ | 2.47 | 7.55 | $ | 367,395 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized (unaudited) |
21,970 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted (unaudited) |
(5,058 | ) | 5,058 | 19.91 | $ | 10.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs granted (unaudited) |
(5,147 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised (unaudited) |
— | (3,932 | ) | 0.92 | $ | 84,219 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled (unaudited) |
332 | (332 | ) | 11.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2014 (unaudited): |
13,403 | 27,518 | $ | 5.79 | 7.38 | $ | 2,419,222 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2013 |
20,605 | $ | 0.84 | 7.26 | $ | 316,812 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013 |
25,798 | $ | 2.32 | 7.52 | $ | 358,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
19,356 | $ | 1.49 | 6.70 | $ | 1,784,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
26,546 | $ | 5.45 | 7.33 | $ | 2,342,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In December 2010, the Company granted a total of 2,400,000 stock options to two employees who are family members of the principal stockholder and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Company. These stock options contain terms similar to other employee stock option grants.
The total fair value of stock options vested in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $1.9 million, $3.0 million, $5.2 million, $3.7 million and $8.9 million, respectively.
The following is a further breakdown of the options outstanding at December 31, 2013:
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
(options in thousands) | Options outstanding |
Weighted- average remaining contractual life (in years) |
Weighted- average exercise price |
Options exercisable |
Weighted- average exercise price |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Range of exercise prices |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–0.66 |
11,451 | 6.98 | $ | 0.62 | 10,594 | $ | 0.62 | |||||||||||||
0.76–0.76 |
9,757 | 7.46 | 0.76 | 8,706 | 0.76 | |||||||||||||||
1.52–2.96 |
2,119 | 8.05 | 1.91 | 1,071 | 1.83 | |||||||||||||||
8.30–8.30 |
574 | 8.80 | 8.30 | 184 | 8.30 | |||||||||||||||
13.72–13.72 |
891 | 9.15 | 13.72 | 28 | 13.72 | |||||||||||||||
15.40–15.40 |
611 | 9.44 | 15.40 | 22 | 15.40 | |||||||||||||||
15.59–15.59 |
472 | 9.64 | 15.59 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
16.19–16.19 |
849 | 9.88 | 16.19 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–16.19 |
26,724 | 7.55 | $ | 2.47 | 20,605 | $ | 0.84 | |||||||||||||
|
The following is a further breakdown of the options outstanding at September 30, 2014 (unaudited):
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
(options in thousands) | Options outstanding |
Weighted- average remaining contractual life (in years) |
Weighted- average exercise price |
Options exercisable |
Weighted- average exercise price |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Range of exercise prices |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–0.66 |
8,901 | 6.37 | $ | 0.62 | 8,814 | $ | 0.62 | |||||||||||||
0.76–0.76 |
8,712 | 6.72 | 0.76 | 8,310 | 0.76 | |||||||||||||||
1.52–2.96 |
1,767 | 7.31 | 1.91 | 1,147 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||
8.30–8.30 |
504 | 8.05 | 8.30 | 243 | 8.30 | |||||||||||||||
13.72–13.72 |
871 | 8.40 | 13.72 | 347 | 13.72 | |||||||||||||||
15.40–15.40 |
572 | 8.69 | 15.40 | 204 | 15.40 | |||||||||||||||
15.59–15.59 |
431 | 8.90 | 15.59 | 122 | 15.59 | |||||||||||||||
16.19–16.19 |
761 | 9.14 | 16.19 | 13 | 16.19 | |||||||||||||||
16.22–16.22 |
1,125 | 9.33 | 16.22 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
16.39–16.39 |
651 | 9.52 | 16.39 | 14 | 16.39 | |||||||||||||||
18.40–18.40 |
2,800 | 9.68 | 18.40 | 142 | 18.40 | |||||||||||||||
38.84–41.98 |
192 | 9.81 | 40.85 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
43.96–65.23 |
231 | 9.84 | 49.40 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–65.23 |
27,518 | 7.38 | $ | 5.79 | 19,356 | $ | 1.49 | |||||||||||||
|
Restricted stock
The Company has granted restricted stock pursuant to its EIP. Restricted stock are share awards that, upon grant, the holder receives restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to repurchase at the original issuance price upon termination of services prior to vesting. These repurchase terms are considered to be a forfeiture provision and do not result in mark-to-market accounting each reporting period. Restricted stock is legally issued and outstanding. However, restricted stock is only deemed outstanding for basic earnings per share computation purposes upon the lapse of the Company’s right of repurchase.
In June 2011, the Company issued 600,000 shares of restricted stock at a purchase price of $0.0033 per share to a related party for consulting services, which vested on the grant date. The intrinsic value on the date of grant was $0.5 million.
In December 2011, the Company issued 433,500 shares of restricted stock to a consultant at a purchase price of $1.52 per share in accordance with the terms of their service agreements, subject to monthly vesting over a three-year service period.
In October 2013, in connection with the acquisition of General Things, the Company issued 430,000 shares of restricted stock to the two founders, of which 322,500 are subject to monthly vesting over a three-year service period.
Early exercised stock options subject to repurchase
The Company has granted options that provide certain option holders the right to exercise unvested options for shares of restricted stock pursuant to its EIP. Restricted shares issued upon early exercise of stock options are legally issued and outstanding. However, these restricted shares are only deemed outstanding for basic earnings per share computation purposes upon the lapse of the Company’s right of repurchase. Cash received from option holders for exercise of unvested options is treated as a refundable deposit shown as a liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and reclassified to stockholders’ equity (deficit) as the Company’s repurchase right lapses.
In December 2011, the Company granted 210,000 stock options to a consultant at an exercise price of $1.52 per share in accordance with the terms of his service agreement, subject to monthly vesting over a two-year service period. In December 2012, the stock options were exercised early and the shares were purchased.
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock and early-exercised stock options subject to repurchase activity is as follows:
(in thousands except for weighted average grant date fair value) | Shares | Weighted- average grant date fair value |
Aggregate intrinsic value |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2010 |
— | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Granted |
1,244 | 1.68 | ||||||||||
Vested |
(600 | ) | 0.98 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2011 |
644 | 2.44 | 711 | |||||||||
Vested |
(212 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2012 |
432 | 2.44 | 5,274 | |||||||||
Granted |
430 | 16.19 | 6,962 | |||||||||
Vested |
(375 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2013 |
487 | 11.03 | 7,628 | |||||||||
Vested (unaudited) |
(215 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
272 | 13.76 | 25,424 | |||||||||
|
The weighted average remaining vesting term for the restricted stock and unvested early-exercised stock options subject to repurchase as of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was 1.4 and 1.1 years, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock and early exercised stock options subject to repurchase vested in the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) were $2.9 million, $6.1 million, $2.7 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Sharing of proceeds from sale of securities
During the development stage of the Company, the founder and CEO entered into a verbal agreement with a sales employee to share 10% of any proceeds from the sale of equity securities held by the founder and CEO. As a result of the issuance of preferred stock to common stockholders in February 2011, and subsequent sale of these preferred shares by the founder and CEO to third parties, an obligation under this verbal agreement arose. In order to satisfy this obligation and any future obligations that may have arisen out of this verbal agreement, the Company entered into a written agreement and provided the following forms of compensation to the employee:
Ÿ |
In March 2011, the Company paid the employee $6.1 million in cash, which was recorded as compensation expense within sales and marketing expense. Also in March 2011, the CEO reimbursed the Company for $6.1 million, which is recorded as a stockholder contribution to additional paid-in capital; |
Ÿ |
In June 2011, the Company issued the employee an option to purchase 6,584,427 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.763 per share. The options vested immediately and have a contractual life of 10 years. $6.8 million of stock compensation expense was recorded in June 2011 within sales and marketing expense as a result of this grant. Upon exercise of this option by the employee, the founder and CEO will contribute an equal number of common shares back to the Company. In June 2014 (unaudited), the employee exercised the option to purchase 665,443 shares, for which the CEO contributed the same number of shares back to the Company; and |
Ÿ |
In December 2011, the Company issued the employee 270,000 RSUs. |
Restricted stock units
The Company has granted RSUs pursuant to its EIP. The Company issued 270,000 RSUs in December 2011 as part of the sharing of proceeds from a sale of securities. There were no RSUs awarded during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013.
RSUs are share awards that, upon vesting, will deliver to the holder shares of the Company’s common stock under the EIP. The vesting of the December 2011 RSU grant of 270,000 RSUs described above is based on the acquisition of the Company. No stock-based compensation expense has been recognized for this grant because satisfaction of the performance condition is not probable.
The weighted average fair value per share of the RSUs awarded in the year ended December 31, 2011 and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $2.23 and $17.39, respectively. The weighted average fair value per share was calculated based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the grant date. As of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the fair value of RSUs outstanding was $4.4 million and $62.4 million, respectively.
Restricted stock unit activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited)
Typically, vesting of RSUs is subject to the employee’s continuing service to the Company. The cost of these awards is determined using the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and compensation is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite vesting period. The Company also issues RSUs with both a market condition and a service condition. The Company estimates the fair value of these market-based RSUs using a Monte Carlo valuation model on the date of grant.
The following table summarizes the activities of the Company’s RSUs:
(in thousands except for weighted average grant date fair value) | Shares | Weighted- average grant date fair value |
||||||
|
||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2013 |
270 | $ | 1.52 | |||||
Granted (unaudited) |
5,147 | 17.39 | ||||||
Vested (unaudited) |
(1,517 | ) | 18.41 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Non-vested shares at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
3,900 | 16.01 | ||||||
|
In January 2014, the Company issued a total of 300,000 RSUs to employees, comprised of three different grants. Two of the grants, or a total of 200,000 shares, are subject to annual vesting over four years based on continued service. The third grant of 100,000 shares will vest 50% on the four-year anniversary and 50% on the five-year anniversary of the grant date based on continued service.
The balance as of September 30, 2014 included 3,000,000 RSUs subject to a market condition. These RSUs were issued to the CEO in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and can be earned ratably over a period of three years, subject to the achievement of certain market condition milestones that were set by the Compensation and Leadership Committee. The Company estimated the fair value of these shares using a Monte Carlo valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Dividend yield |
None | |||
Expected volatility |
50.9% | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.69% | |||
Expected term (years) |
10 | |||
Grant date fair value of underlying shares |
$ | 18.40 | ||
|
The weighted average remaining vesting term for RSUs as of September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was 3.0 years. The amount of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed with respect to RSUs at September 30, 2014 was $56.2 million. The total fair value of RSUs vested in the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $28.5 million.
|
7. Stock-based compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock and RSUs for the three years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), as follows:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award |
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
$ | 8,518 | $ | 8,165 | $ | 8,468 | $ | 5,843 | $ | 11,504 | ||||||||||
ESPP |
— | — | — | — | 873 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
457 | 991 | 2,419 | 1,504 | 4,906 | |||||||||||||||
RSUs |
— | — | — | — | 34,860 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
8,975 | 9,156 | 10,887 | 7,347 | 52,143 | |||||||||||||||
|
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense as reported in the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 122 | $ | 333 | $ | 690 | $ | 530 | $ | 555 | ||||||||||
Research and development |
261 | 1,452 | 3,003 | 1,737 | 5,486 | |||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
7,690 | 6,335 | 5,670 | 4,077 | 6,293 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
902 | 1,036 | 1,524 | 1,003 | 39,809 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
8,975 | 9,156 | 10,887 | 7,347 | 52,143 | |||||||||||||||
Total tax benefit recognized |
(2,897 | ) | (1,091 | ) | (1,104 | ) | (838 | ) | (14,774 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in net income |
$ | 6,078 | $ | 8,065 | $ | 9,783 | $ | 6,509 | $ | 37,369 | ||||||||||
|
Stock-based compensation expense related to manufacturing personnel that was capitalized into inventory was immaterial for all periods presented.
The amount of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed with respect to unvested employee options at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $22.8 million and $58.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the weighted-average period over which the unearned stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized was 1.0 year and 3.4 years, respectively. If there are any modifications or cancellations of the underlying unvested awards, the Company may be required to accelerate, increase or cancel any remaining unearned stock-based compensation expense. Future stock-based compensation expense will increase to the extent that the Company grants additional equity awards or assumes unvested equity awards in connection with acquisitions.
Stock option valuation assumptions
The fair value of the options granted was estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming the assumptions listed in the following table:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Expected life (years) |
5.0–6.1 | 5.1–6.1 | 5.3–6.1 | 5.3–6.1 | 5.3–6.3 | |||||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.1%–2.4% | 0.8%–2.4% | 0.8%–2.4% | 0.8%–2.0% | 1.7%–2.0% | |||||||||||||||
Volatility |
56%–59% | 56%–60% | 56%–60% | 56%-60% | 54%–56% | |||||||||||||||
Dividend yield |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||||||||||||||
Expected forfeiture rate |
5% | 5%–7% | 6% | 6% | 5%–6% | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average fair value |
$0.98 | $5.08 | $8.45 | $8.20 | $10.58 | |||||||||||||||
|
Compensation amortization period
All stock-based compensation is amortized over the requisite service period of the awards, which is generally the same as the vesting period of the awards. The Company amortizes the fair value cost on a straight-line basis over the expected service periods.
Expected life
Expected life represents the period over which the Company anticipates stock-based awards to be outstanding. As the Company has undergone significant operational and structural changes, the historical exercise data do not provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected life. As a result, the Company used the simplified method, as provided under Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 14.D, “Share-Based Payment,” to calculate the expected term estimate based on the options’ vesting term and contractual terms. Under the simplified method, the expected life is equal to the average of the stock-based award’s weighted average vesting period and its contractual term.
Expected volatility
Expected volatility is a measure of the amount by which the stock price is expected to fluctuate. The Company estimates the expected volatility of its stock options at their grant date by taking the average historical volatility of a group of comparable publicly traded companies over a period equal to the expected life of the options.
Risk-free interest rate
The risk-free interest rate is the estimated average interest rate based on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon notes with terms consistent with the expected life of the awards.
Expected dividends
The Company concluded that cash dividends paid prior to being converted to a C corporation from an S corporation were solely for meeting stockholders’ tax liabilities as a pass-through entity. The cash dividend in 2012 was structured as a one-off event to return value to the stockholders, as discussed in Note 5, “Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock.” The Company may from time to time contemplate capital transactions, including for example a nonrecurring dividend to create a liquidity event for its stockholders. However, the Company does not anticipate paying any recurring cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, the Company uses an expected dividend yield of 0% in stock option valuation models.
Expected forfeitures
Stock-based compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statements of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2013 and nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) are based on awards that are expected to vest less estimated forfeitures. The Company estimates the forfeiture rate of its stock-based awards based on an analysis of actual forfeitures, employee turnover and other factors. The impact from a forfeiture rate adjustment would be recognized in full in the period in which the forfeiture rate changes and, if the actual number of future forfeitures differs from prior estimates, the Company may record adjustments to stock-based compensation, if necessary.
Determining the fair value of the Company’s common stock
Determining the fair value of the Company’s common stock requires complex and subjective judgment and estimates. There is inherent uncertainty in making these judgments and estimates. The absence of an active market for the Company’s common stock required the Board to estimate the fair value of the common stock for purposes of setting the exercise price of the options and estimating the fair value of the common stock at each meeting at which options were granted based on factors such as the valuations of comparable companies, the status of the Company’s development and sales efforts, revenue growth, independent third-party valuations and additional objective and subjective factors relating to the Company’s business. The Company performed its analysis in accordance with applicable elements of the practice aid issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants entitled Valuation of Privately Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. The fair value of the underlying common stock will be determined by the Board until such time as its common stock is listed on an established stock exchange.
Stock option modifications
During 2012, the Company modified options to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock of three employees to accelerate vesting and extend the time allowed to exercise the stock options in conjunction with termination of employment. The Company recorded a charge of $1.1 million related to the modification of these awards, of which $1.0 million was recorded to sales and marketing expense and the remaining amounts to research and development and general and administrative expenses based on the employees’ functional role within the Company. During 2013, the Company modified options to purchase 8,438 shares of common stock to accelerate vesting and extend the time allowed to exercise the stock options after termination of employment. The Company recorded a charge of $0.1 million related to the modification of this award to cost of revenue, based on the employee’s functional role within the Company.
Compensation cost recognized upon employee sale of shares to the CEO
In December 2012, eight employees sold 760,500 shares of their common stock for $13.0 million to the Company’s CEO. The stock was sold at $17.08 per share, which was greater than the determined fair value of the common stock at the time of sale. The fair value was determined by the Board, based on the Company’s development and sales efforts, revenue growth, independent third-party valuations and additional objective and subjective factors relating to the Company’s business. The Company determined that the amount paid by the Company’s CEO exceeded the estimated fair value of these shares by $2.6 million and concluded that the value transferred to employees in excess of the fair value of shares sold was additional compensation to the selling employees. As a result, the Company recorded compensation expense of $2.6 million, of which $0.3 million was recorded to research and development, $1.7 million was recorded to sales and marketing and $0.6 million was recorded to general and administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, based on the employees’ functional roles within the Company. Of the 760,500 shares sold, the Company repurchased 240,000 shares from two employees who are family members of the Company’s CEO.
Restricted stock and early exercised options subject to repurchase
In June 2011, the Company granted a total of 600,000 shares of restricted stock at a purchase price of $0.0033 per share to two family members of the CEO for consulting services, which vested on the grant date. These shares of restricted stock were accounted for at fair value. General and administrative expense related to these options for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $0.5 million.
In December 2011, the Company granted 433,500 shares of restricted stock and 210,000 stock options to two consultants that the Company sponsors at an exercise price of $1.52 per share in accordance with the terms of their service agreements, subject to monthly vesting over a three-year service period and a two-year service period, respectively. Sales and marketing expense related to these restricted shares for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $1,000, $1.9 million, $3.5 million, $2.6 million and $3.8 million, respectively.
In October 2013, pursuant to the acquisition of General Things, the Company issued 430,000 shares of restricted stock to the two founders, of which 322,500 are subject to monthly vesting over a three-year service period. Research and development expense related to these restricted shares for the year ended December 31, 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $0.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively.
The amount of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed with respect to unvested non-employee share-based payment awards at December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $7.4 million and $8.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the weighted-average period over which the unearned stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized was 1.4 years and 1.1 years, respectively.
Restricted stock units (unaudited)
In January 2014, the Company issued a total of 300,000 RSUs to employees, comprised of three different grants. Two of the grants, or a total of 200,000 shares, are subject to annual vesting over four years based on continued service. The third grant of 100,000 shares will vest 50% on the four-year anniversary and 50% on the five-year anniversary based on continued service.
The balance as of September 30, 2014 included 3,000,000 RSUs subject to a market condition. These RSUs were issued to the CEO in the second quarter of fiscal 2014 and can be earned ratably over a period of three years, subject to the achievement of certain market condition milestones that were set by the Compensation and Leadership Committee.
General and administrative expense related to these RSUs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $34.9 million. The amount of unearned stock-based compensation currently estimated to be expensed related to these RSUs at September 30, 2014 was $56.2 million. As of September 30, 2014, the weighted-average period over which the unearned stock-based compensation is expected to be recognized was 3.0 years.
Non-employee options
In December 2011, the Company granted options to purchase 90,000 shares of common stock to consultants at an exercise price of $1.52, which vested on the grant date. Sales and marketing expense related to these options for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $0.2 million.
In April 2013, the Company granted options to purchase 44,000 shares of common stock to two contractors at an exercise price of $15.40. In September 2013, one of the contractors was terminated and the other contractor was converted to an employee on October 1, 2013. Sales and marketing expense related to these options was $0.2 million in 2013. Non-employee stock compensation expense is included in the stock-based compensation tables in this footnote.
|
9. Financing arrangements
Credit facility
On December 21, 2012, the Company entered into a $170.0 million syndicated senior secured credit facility consisting of a $120.0 million three-year term loan facility and a $50.0 million four-year revolving credit facility. The Company received net proceeds of $127.6 million, net of $2.4 million of debt issuance and lender costs. The debt issuance and lender costs were allocated between the term loan facility and the revolving credit facility based on the maximum lending commitment amounts. The debt issuance costs allocated to the term loan facility are reported as deferred charges and the lender costs allocated to the term loan facility are included in the carrying value of the term loan as debt discount. The deferred issuance and lender costs allocated to the term loan facility are amortized to interest expense over the contractual term of the term loan facility using the effective interest method. Costs allocated to the revolving credit facility are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method over the four year contractual term of the revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the credit facility are collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company.
The term loan facility has scheduled quarterly principal repayments due on the last day of each quarter of $1.5 million per quarter in 2013, $3.0 million per quarter in 2014 and $6.0 million for the first three quarters of 2015 with the balance of $84.0 million due on December 21, 2015. The interest rate is based on the 6-month adjusted LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) plus 2.5%. The initial contractual interest rate is 3.06% and will adjust every six months. The inception date effective interest rate was 3.71%. The Company may prepay the term loan at any time, without penalty. Mandatory additional principal prepayments may be required based on excess cash flows of the Company. The Company’s excess cash flows, as defined in the credit facility, for 2013 triggered a contractual principal prepayment obligation of $48.5 million, which has been classified as a current liability as of December 31, 2013. In April 2014, the Company amended the credit facility agreement for its term loan to extend the due date for this contractual principal prepayment from April 2014 to December 2014.
As of December 31, 2013, $114.0 million of the term loan was outstanding. The remaining unamortized discount was $0.4 million as of December 31, 2013. The effective interest rate on the term loan was 3.79% on December 31, 2013.
The revolving credit facility matures on December 21, 2016. Principal can be paid and re-borrowed during the term of the revolving credit facility. The interest rate is based on the 3-month adjusted LIBOR plus 2.5%. The initial interest rate was 2.81% and will adjust quarterly for any balance outstanding. Mandatory additional principal repayments may be required based on excess cash flows of the Company once the term loan facility has been fully repaid. As of December 31, 2013, zero of the revolving credit facility was drawn down. As of December 31, 2013 $20.0 million of the revolving credit facility was committed to a standby letter of credit. In April 2014, the $20.0 million standby letter of credit was terminated.
The credit agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants applicable to the Company and its restricted subsidiaries, including, among other things, restrictions on indebtedness, liens, investments, mergers, dispositions, prepayment of other indebtedness and dividends and other distributions. The credit agreement contains an acceleration clause for certain events related to the Company’s financial creditworthiness, including a financial covenant that requires the Company to maintain specific consolidated ratios. As of December 31, 2013, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
Repayment of credit facility (unaudited)
Concurrent with the close of the IPO on July 1, 2014, the Company repaid, in full, the term loan outstanding of $108.0 million. The Company recorded the remaining deferred issuance costs and debt discount of $0.6 million related to the term loan as interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
In August 2014, the Company terminated the revolving credit facility and the then remaining deferred issuance costs of $0.5 million as interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Line of credit
Prior to the credit facility in December 2012, the Company had a line of credit agreement which provided for borrowings of up to $15.0 million, which was later amended to increase the maximum amount of borrowings up to $50.0 million, with interest at the bank’s prime rate. Borrowings under this line of credit were collateralized by substantially all of the assets of the Company. During 2012, the Company failed to provide a required pledge agreement upon creation of a foreign subsidiary, failed to provide audited financial statements within 120 days after year end and did not meet the quarterly net income covenant for the quarter ended September 30, 2012. All covenant defaults were waived by the bank. In December 2012, the line of credit was cancelled due to the new credit facility that was entered in December 2012.
License financing arrangement
In August 2013, the Company entered into a Stadium Builders License Agreement (License Agreement) with the Santa Clara Stadium Authority. As part of the License Agreement, the Company will have rights during the agreement term to season tickets for a National Football League team. The cost of the license was $4.0 million, of which $3.2 million was financed with the Santa Clara Stadium Authority at an 8.5% fixed interest rate over the course of the first ten years of the new stadium. Interest was to begin accruing on March 1, 2014. The financing arrangement requires ten annual payments of $0.4 million, with an option to pay off the principal at any time without any prepayment penalty. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had made a payment of $0.4 million, and recorded a long term asset of $4.0 million and a short term liability of $3.6 million on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets related to this License Agreement. In January and February 2014, the Company paid down the remaining $3.6 million related to the license agreement with the Santa Clara Stadium Authority. As of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), there were no further financial obligations related to this License Agreement outstanding.
Loan agreement
In December 2010, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a bank which provided for borrowings up to $5.0 million and bore interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.75%. The loan agreement expired on December 27, 2011, with no funds borrowed.
CineForm noteholders note payable
As part of the acquisition consideration of CineForm, Inc., the Company assumed $760,000 of the outstanding balance due to CineForm Noteholders. See Note 15, “Acquisition of CineForm.” The note balance was payable in six equal quarterly installments plus accrued interest at 7%. This note was fully repaid in 2012.
|
10. Income taxes
Income before income tax consisted of the following:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 38,791 | $ | 38,714 | $ | 57,251 | ||||||
Foreign |
— | 14,496 | 34,078 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 38,791 | $ | 53,210 | $ | 91,329 | |||||||
|
Income tax expense consisted of the following:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 16,687 | $ | 19,984 | $ | 28,856 | ||||||
State |
4,323 | (493 | ) | 1,634 | ||||||||
Foreign |
— | 3,578 | 8,058 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current |
21,010 | 23,069 | 38,548 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
(5,962 | ) | (2,247 | ) | (7,268 | ) | ||||||
State |
(869 | ) | 126 | (861 | ) | |||||||
Foreign |
— | — | 332 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total deferred |
(6,831 | ) | (2,121 | ) | (7,797 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 14,179 | $ | 20,948 | $ | 30,751 | ||||||
|
Undistributed earnings of $36.9 million of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are considered to be indefinitely reinvested and, accordingly, no provision for federal and state income taxes have been provided thereon. The Company intends to reinvest these earnings indefinitely in its foreign subsidiaries. If these earnings were distributed to the United States in the form of dividends or otherwise or if the shares of the relevant foreign subsidiaries were sold or otherwise transferred the Company would be subject to additional U.S. income taxes (subject to adjustment for foreign tax credits) and foreign withholding taxes. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practical.
Income tax expense reconciles to the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate (35%) to income before income taxes as follows:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage) | $ | % | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation to statutory rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax at federal statutory rate |
$ | 13,577 | 35.0% | $ | 18,623 | 35.0% | $ | 31,965 | 35.0% | |||||||||||||||
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
2,229 | 5.8 | 1,384 | 2.6 | 2,344 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impact of foreign operations |
— | — | (211 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (113 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
540 | 1.4 | 1,385 | 2.6 | 2,982 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
S corporation status benefit |
(1,082 | ) | (2.8 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
S corporation conversion—DTA setup |
(965 | ) | (2.5 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Tax credits |
(211 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (415 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (5,637 | ) | (6.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other |
91 | 0.3 | 182 | 0.3 | (790 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 14,179 | 36.6% | $ | 20,948 | 39.4% | $ | 30,751 | 33.7% | ||||||||||||||||
|
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 746 | $ | 252 | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
3,477 | 3,475 | ||||||
Accruals and reserves |
6,973 | 15,463 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Gross deferred tax assets |
11,196 | 19,190 | ||||||
Valuation allowance |
(204 | ) | — | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
10,992 | 19,190 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(1,998 | ) | (3,063 | ) | ||||
Intangible assets |
(1,214 | ) | (550 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(3,212 | ) | (3,613 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 7,780 | $ | 15,577 | ||||
|
Recognition of deferred tax assets is appropriate when realization of such assets is more likely than not. Based upon the weight of available evidence, which includes the Company’s historical operating performance and the U.S. cumulative net profits in prior periods, the Company believes it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets will be realized.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company’s federal and state net operating loss carryforwards for income tax purposes were $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively. If not utilized, the federal and state losses will begin to expire in 2022 and 2014, respectively. Utilization of these federal and state tax credit carryforwards are subject to an annual utilization limitation of $1.2 million due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and similar state provisions.
Uncertain income tax positions
The Company has adopted ASC 740-10 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.” ASC 740-10 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the Company’s income tax return, and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company’s total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2013 was $9.9 million, which represented an increase in unrecognized tax benefits by $5.5 million during 2013. If recognized, $9.4 million of these unrecognized tax benefits (net of federal benefit) would be recorded as a reduction of future income tax provision for the year ending December 31, 2013.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the unrecognized income tax benefits during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Gross balance at January 1 |
$ | — | $ | 966 | $ | 4,439 | ||||||
Gross increase related to current year tax positions |
171 | 3,473 | 5,280 | |||||||||
Gross increase related to prior year tax positions |
795 | — | 179 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 966 | $ | 4,439 | $ | 9,898 | |||||||
|
The Company’s policy is to account for interest and penalties as income tax expense. As of the December 31, 2013, the Company had accrued no interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.
It is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase within the next 12 months. However, the range of the reasonably possible change cannot be reliably estimated.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, certain U.S. states and Hong Kong. The Company is subject to U.S. federal income tax examination for calendar tax years ending 2010 through 2013, from 2009 through 2013 for state tax purposes and 2013 for Hong Kong. The U.S. federal and U.S. state taxing authorities may choose to audit tax returns for tax years beyond the statute of limitation period due to significant tax attribute carryforwards from prior years, making adjustments only to carryforward attributes.
The Company was contacted for audit in December 2013 by the Internal Revenue Service for the 2011 tax year which included a partial year S corporation and partial year C corporation return. At this time, the Company is not able to estimate the potential impact that the examination may have on income tax expense. If the examination is resolved unfavorably, there is a possibility it may have a material negative impact on the Company’s results of operations.
|
11. Related parties
Beginning in fiscal year 2013, the Company entered into agreements for certain contract manufacturing and engineering services with a company affiliated with one of its investors. In 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the Company made payments of $3.6 million and $11.9 million, respectively, for services rendered. As of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the Company had accounts payable associated with this vendor of $3.9 million and zero, respectively.
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company settled an outstanding legal matter with one of the CEO’s family members for $0.2 million.
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company loaned one of its executive officers $150,000 pursuant to a demand payment loan that did not bear interest, which was fully repaid in March 2014.
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with a company affiliated with the son of one of the members of the Board to acquire certain naming rights to a sprint kart race track. As consideration for these naming rights, the Company will pay a total of $0.5 million in installments beginning in October 2013 over the naming rights period. In addition to the fee, the Company will also provide the company with 100 GoPro capture devices at no cost each year during the term of the agreement, which is three years. As of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the Company has paid $0.2 million related to this agreement.
In December 2013, the Company entered into a separation agreement with the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to which the Company paid him cash severance of $0.3 million.
In fiscal year 2013 and during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the Company incurred and expensed chartered aircraft fees for the use of the CEO’s private plane, for which $0.3 million was paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited) and $0.4 million was accrued as of September 30, 2014 (unaudited).
In May 2014 (unaudited), the Company amended the outstanding stock options granted to the former Chief Financial Officer to facilitate the net exercise of those options and subsequently repurchased 41,154 shares of common stock from the former Chief Financial Officer’s estate at a purchase price of $18.40 per share.
On June 3, 2014 (unaudited), the Company granted to the newly hired President of the Company an option to purchase 2,227,106 shares of common stock. In addition, the Company issued the President 248,749 RSUs and the CEO 4,500,000 RSUs. Of the 4,500,000 RSUs issued to the CEO, 1,500,000 RSUs vested immediately, 1,500,000 RSUs vest over a three-year period with the attainment of a milestone stock price for 30 consecutive days, and 1,500,000 RSUs vest over a three-year period with the attainment of a second milestone stock price for 30 consecutive days.
In June 2014 (unaudited), the CEO purchased seven automobiles from the Company for a total purchase price of $0.3 million.
Other related party transactions involving the Company’s CEO are discussed in Note 6, “Stockholders’ equity (deficit).”
|
12. Commitments, contingencies and guarantees
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual commitments as of December 31, 2013:
(in thousands) | Total | 1 year (fiscal 2014) |
2-3 years (fiscal 2015 and 2016) |
4-5 years (fiscal 2017 and 2018) |
More than 5 years (beyond fiscal 2018) |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Term loan principal and interest(1) |
$ | 118,606 | $ | 63,652 | $ | 54,954 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Operating leases(2) |
32,243 | 7,681 | 13,368 | 10,614 | 580 | |||||||||||||||
Sponsorship commitments(3) |
34,423 | 18,526 | 15,596 | 301 | — | |||||||||||||||
License financing arrangement(4) |
3,600 | 3,600 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other contractual commitments(5) |
4,365 | 1,896 | 2,469 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital equipment purchase commitments(6) |
3,607 | 3,607 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 196,844 | $ | 98,962 | $ | 86,387 | $ | 10,915 | $ | 580 | ||||||||||
|
(1) | See Note 9, “Financing arrangements.” Interest payments were calculated using the applicable rate as of December 31, 2013. |
(2) | The Company leases its facilities under long-term operating leases, which expire at various dates through May 2019. The lease agreements frequently include leasehold improvement incentives, escalating lease payments, renewal provisions and other provisions which require the Company to pay taxes, insurance, maintenance costs or defined rent increases. |
(3) | The Company sponsors sporting events, resorts and athletes as part of its marketing efforts. In many cases, the Company enters into multi-year agreements with event organizers and athletes. |
(4) | In August 2013, the Company entered into a license agreement with the Santa Clara Stadium Authority which gave it rights during the agreement term to season tickets for a National Football League team. The cost of the license was $4.0 million, of which $3.6 million remains to be paid as of December 31, 2013 and was recorded as a short-term liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(5) | In 2013, the Company purchased software licenses and engaged outside consultants to assist with upgrading or implementing its financial and IT systems, which require payments over multiple years. |
(6) | The Company enters into contracts to acquire equipment for tooling and molds as part of its manufacturing operations. In addition, the Company incurs purchase commitments related to the manufacturing of its POP displays by third parties. The Company has revised the previously disclosed amount for capital equipment purchase commitments as of December 31, 2013 to correct this amount. |
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual commitments as of September 30, 2014 (unaudited):
(in thousands) | Total | 1 year (remaining 3 months fiscal 2014) |
2-3 years (fiscal 2015 and 2016) |
4-5 years (fiscal 2017 and 2018) |
More than 5 years (beyond fiscal 2018) |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases(1) |
28,652 | 2,325 | 14,737 | 10,997 | 593 | |||||||||||||||
Sponsorship commitments(2) |
18,228 | 3,001 | 14,103 | 1,124 | — | |||||||||||||||
Other contractual commitments(3) |
7,738 | 292 | 6,075 | 1,371 | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital equipment purchase commitments(4) |
6,307 | 6,307 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 60,925 | $ | 11,925 | $ | 34,915 | $ | 13,492 | $ | 593 | ||||||||||
|
(1) | The Company leases its facilities under long-term operating leases, which expire at various dates through May 2019. The lease agreements frequently include leasehold improvement incentives, escalating lease payments, renewal provisions and other provisions which require the Company to pay taxes, insurance, maintenance costs or defined rent increases. |
(2) | The Company sponsors sporting events and athletes as part of its marketing efforts. In many cases, the Company enters into multi-year agreements with event organizers and athletes. |
(3) | The Company purchases software licenses and engages outside consultants to assist with upgrading or implementing its financial and IT systems, which require payments over multiple years. |
(4) | The Company enters into contracts to acquire equipment for tooling and molds as part of its manufacturing operations. In addition, the Company incurs purchase commitments related to the manufacturing of its POP displays by third parties. |
Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was $0.4 million, $1.9 million, $3.9 million, $2.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively.
Legal proceedings
From time to time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes that the outcome of any existing litigation, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material impact on the results of operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Company.
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into agreements that contain a variety of representations and warranties and provide for general indemnification. The Company’s exposure under these agreements is unknown because it involves claims that may be made against the Company in the future, but have not yet been made. To date, the Company has not paid any claims or been required to defend any action related to its indemnification obligations. However, the Company may record charges in the future as a result of these indemnification obligations.
Product warranty
As of December 31, 2013, $3.7 million of the warranty liability was recorded as an element of accrued liabilities and $0.2 million was recorded as an element of other long-term liabilities. As of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), $5.1 million of the warranty liability was recorded as an element of accrued liabilities and $0.3 million was recorded as an element of other long-term liabilities.
The following table summarizes the warranty liability activity:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning balances |
$ | 116 | $ | 589 | $ | 1,937 | $ | 3,870 | ||||||||
Charged to cost of revenue |
1,644 | 2,821 | 7,380 | 6,978 | ||||||||||||
Settlements of warranty claims |
(1,171 | ) | (1,473 | ) | (5,447 | ) | (5,465 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Ending balances |
$ | 589 | $ | 1,937 | $ | 3,870 | $ | 5,383 | ||||||||
|
|
13. Employee retirement plan
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company established a 401(k) defined contribution retirement plan (Retirement Plan) covering U.S. full-time employees. The Retirement Plan provides for voluntary employee contributions from 1% to 86% of annual compensation, subject to a maximum limit allowed by Internal Revenue Service guidelines.
In March 2014, the Company modified its Retirement Plan to include an employer matching contribution. The Company will make a matching contribution equal to the employee’s 401(k) deferral up to 4% of their 401(k) eligible compensation per pay period. The matching contribution is retroactive to January 1, 2014.
|
14. Concentrations of risk and segment information
Segment information
The Company operates as one operating segment as it only reports financial information on an aggregate and consolidated basis to its CEO, who is the Company’s chief operating decision maker.
Customer concentration
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of trade receivables. The Company believes that the credit risk in its trade receivables is mitigated by the Company’s credit evaluation process, relatively short collection terms and dispersion of its customer base. The Company generally does not require collateral and losses on trade receivables have historically been within management’s expectations.
As of December 31, 2012, one distributor customer accounted for 10% of the Company’s net accounts receivable balance. As of December 31, 2012 and 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), one retail customer accounted for 47%, 21% and 30% of the Company’s net accounts receivable balance, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), a second retail customer accounted for 14% of the Company’s net accounts receivable balance. As of December 31, 2013, a third retail customer accounted for 11% of the Company’s net accounts receivable balance. As of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), a fourth retail customer accounted for 13% of the Company’s net accounts receivable.
In 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the Company sold accounts receivables, without recourse, of $71.1 million and $121.6 million, respectively, from a customer to a third-party banking institution. Factoring fees of $0.6 million and $1.1 million in 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited), respectively, related to the sale of trade accounts receivable were included in other income (expense), net.
Customers with revenue equal to or greater than 10% of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) were as follows:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
A (retailer) |
15% | 15% | 17% | 15% | 19% | |||||||||||||||
B (distributor) |
* | * | * | 10% | * | |||||||||||||||
|
* | Less than 10% of total revenue for the period indicated |
Supplier concentration
The Company relies on third parties for the supply and manufacture of its capture devices. In instances where a supply and manufacture agreement does not exist or suppliers fail to perform their obligations, the Company may be unable to find alternative suppliers or satisfactorily deliver its products to its customers on time, if at all.
The Company also relies on third parties with whom it outsources supply chain activities related to inventory warehousing, order fulfillment, distribution and other direct sales logistics. The Company cannot be sure that these parties will perform their obligations as expected or that any cost savings, or other benefits will be derived from the efforts of these parties. If any of these parties breaches or terminates their agreement with the Company or otherwise fails to perform their obligations in a timely manner, the Company’s financial results may be adversely affected.
Geographic and other information
Revenue by geographic region, based on ship-to destinations, was as follows:
Year ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 168,450 | $ | 314,135 | $ | 557,285 | $ | 328,006 | $ | 482,769 | ||||||||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
51,328 | 157,587 | 311,674 | 218,884 | 193,844 | |||||||||||||||
Asia and Pacific area countries |
14,460 | 54,294 | 116,778 | 77,395 | 83,679 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ | 234,238 | $ | 526,016 | $ | 985,737 | $ | 624,285 | $ | 760,292 | |||||||||||
|
Revenue in the United States, which is included in the Americas geographic region, was $151.4 million, $278.7 million, $498.5 million, $296.4 million and $428.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), respectively.
As of December 31, 2012 and 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) long-lived assets, which represent property and equipment, located outside the United States, primarily China, were $4.0 million, $6.0 million and $13.9 million, respectively.
The Company does not disclose revenue by product category as it does not track sales incentives and other revenue adjustments by product category to report such data.
|
15. Acquisitions
CineForm, Inc.
On February 25, 2011, the Company acquired all of the shares of CineForm. CineForm was a provider of professional editing compression and decompression (CODEC) software that made high definition (HD) and three dimensional (3D) editing faster and more convenient without sacrificing quality. The acquisition of CineForm enabled GoPro to utilize CineForm’s compression and other proprietary technologies to enhance the video image quality of its cameras.
The total acquisition consideration for CineForm of $9.9 million consisted of $8.0 million paid at the closing (net of $0.2 million cash acquired), a holdback of $0.9 million for indemnification of representations made by the acquiree, assumption of $0.8 million of CineForm notes payable and assumption of $0.3 million of vested employee stock options. The holdback amount and notes payable were payable in six equal quarterly installments, plus 7% interest accrued on the note payable. In addition, the Company recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of $0.3 million, which were included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company has calculated the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired to allocate the purchase price as of the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the aggregate fair values was recognized as goodwill. Based upon these calculations, the purchase price of the transaction was allocated as follows:
(in thousands) | Estimated useful life (in years) |
Purchase price |
||||||
|
||||||||
Purchased intangible assets: |
||||||||
Developed technology |
6 | $ | 5,330 | |||||
Customer relationships |
3 | 170 | ||||||
Tradename |
5 | 664 | ||||||
Noncompete agreements |
2 | 150 | ||||||
Goodwill (non-tax deductible) |
4,233 | |||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
(488 | ) | ||||||
Other assets and liabilities acquired, net of cash |
(146 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets acquired |
$ | 9,913 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Cash paid |
$ | 7,955 | ||||||
Options issued |
339 | |||||||
CineForm note |
760 | |||||||
Deferred cash (holdback) |
859 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total consideration issued in the acquisition |
$ | 9,913 | ||||||
|
The fair values of the intangible assets were determined using the income approach with significant inputs that are not observable in the market. Key assumptions included expected future cash flows and discount rates consistent with the assessment of risk. Purchased intangible assets are amortized using a straight-line amortization method over their estimated useful lives. Among the factors that contributed to a purchase price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets were the synergies in products that can be leveraged by the Company and the acquisition of an assembled workforce of experienced software engineers.
The results of operations of CineForm are included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition. The pro forma financial information has not been presented as the Company’s consolidated results of operations presented herein materially reflect the full effects of the acquisition for the fiscal years since the acquisition closed on February 25, 2011.
General Things
On October 18, 2013, the Company completed the acquisition of 100% of the shares of General Things, a leading digital design and software studio based in San Francisco, California for aggregate acquisition consideration of $17.0 million, comprised of $10.0 million of cash and $7.0 million related to 430,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The cash consideration includes retention bonuses of $1.7 million and the shares of the Company’s common stock includes 322,500 unvested stock awards. The acquisition is expected to advance the Company’s business back-end and consumer-facing web development.
Of the aggregate acquisition consideration, approximately $10.1 million was determined to be the accounting purchase price attributable to the portion of cash and common stock for which there is no remaining requisite service period. The Company expects to record $6.9 million as compensation expense over the requisite service periods following the acquisition.
The Company also recorded acquisition-related transaction costs of $0.3 million, which were included in general and administrative expenses during the year ended December 31, 2013.
The Company has calculated the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired to allocate the purchase price as of the acquisition date. The excess of purchase price over the aggregate fair values was recognized as goodwill. Based upon these calculations, the purchase price of the transaction was allocated as follows:
(in thousands) | Estimated useful life (in years) |
Purchase price |
||||||
|
||||||||
Purchased intangible asset: |
||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
2 | $ | 161 | |||||
Goodwill (non-tax deductible) |
9,862 | |||||||
Other assets and liabilities acquired, net of cash |
84 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets acquired |
$ | 10,107 | ||||||
|
The fair value of the intangible asset was determined using the income approach with significant inputs that are not observable in the market. Key assumptions included expected future cash flows and discount rates consistent with the assessment of risk. The purchased intangible asset will be amortized using a straight-line amortization method over its estimated useful lives. Among the factors that contributed to a purchase price in excess of the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets were the synergies in products that can be leveraged by the Company and the acquisition of an assembled workforce of experienced software engineers.
The results of operations of General Things are included in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition. Pro forma results of operations for the General Things acquisition have not been presented because they are not material to the Company’s consolidated results of operations.
|
16. Subsequent events
The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through March 14, 2014, the date that the audited annual consolidated financial statements were issued.
In January 2014, the Company granted to its employees stock options to purchase 1,142,750 shares of the Company’s common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $16.22 per share. In addition, the Company issued 300,000 RSUs.
In January 2014, the Company amended one of its sponsorship agreements, which would have expired in 2015, to expire in 2014. This reduced the Company’s sponsorship commitments by $12.8 million.
On February 5, 2014, the Company changed its name from Woodman Labs, Inc. to GoPro, Inc.
In January and February 2014, the Company paid down the remaining $3.6 million related to the license agreement with the Santa Clara Stadium Authority.
|
Principles of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements include all the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Unless otherwise specified, references to the Company are references to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported and disclosed in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to its allowance for doubtful accounts, stock-based compensation, inventory valuation, warranty liabilities, sales returns, web-based sale deliveries at period-end, implied post contract support and marketing allowances, the valuation and useful life evaluation of acquired intangibles, the valuation of deferred income tax assets and uncertain tax positions. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from management’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.
Unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
The accompanying interim consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2014, the interim consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 and the interim consolidated statement of redeemable convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 are unaudited. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis consistent with the annual consolidated financial statements and, in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the Company’s financial position as of September 30, 2014 and its results of operations and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The financial data and the other financial information disclosed in the notes to these consolidated financial statements related to the nine-month periods are also unaudited. The results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014, or for any other future year or interim period.
Comprehensive income
For all periods presented, comprehensive income equaled net income. Therefore, the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted from the consolidated financial statements.
Cash equivalents (unaudited)
Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid financial instruments with immaterial interest rate risk that are readily convertible to cash and have maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase. As of September 30, 2014, cash equivalents consisted of money market funds and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts
Accounts receivables are stated at invoice value less estimated allowances for returns and doubtful accounts. The Company continually monitors customer payments and maintains a reserve for estimated losses resulting from its customers’ inability to make required payments. The Company considers factors such as historical experience, credit quality, age of the accounts receivable balances, geographic related risks and economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. In cases where there are circumstances that may impair a specific customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations, a specific allowance is recorded against amounts due, and thereby reduces the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably believed to be collectible. For all periods presented, the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was not material.
Inventories
Inventories consist of finished goods and component parts, which are purchased from contract manufacturers. Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company’s assessment of market value requires the use of estimates regarding the net realizable value of its inventory balances, including an assessment of excess or obsolete inventories. The Company determines excess and obsolete inventories based on an estimate of the future demand for its products within a specified time horizon, generally 12 months. The estimates used for future demand are also used for near-term capacity planning and inventory purchases and are consistent with revenue forecast assumptions. If the Company’s demand forecast is greater than actual demand, the Company may be required to record an excess inventory charge, which would decrease gross profit. Any write-downs taken establish a new cost basis for the underlying inventory. For all periods presented, inventories were predominantly comprised of finished goods.
Point of purchase (POP) displays
The Company sponsors a program to provide retailers with POP displays in order to facilitate the marketing of the Company’s products within retail stores. The POP displays contain a video display that broadcast video images taken by GoPro cameras with product placement available on the POP display for cameras and accessories. The Company generally provides these POP displays to customers free of charge. The costs of the POP displays, less any fees charged to customers, are capitalized as a long-term asset on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the net cost is recognized over the expected period of the benefit provided by these assets, which is generally 24 months. POP display amortization included in sales and marketing expense were $3.6 million, $8.6 million, $13.5 million, $8.9 million and $13.2 million for 2011, 2012, 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), respectively.
Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the assets, ranging from one to seven years. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the expected useful life of the improvements. Property and equipment pending installation, configuration or qualification are classified as construction in progress.
one to seven years. Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the expected useful life of the improvements. Property and equipment pending installation, configuration or qualification are classified as construction in progress.
Fair value measurements
The Company categorizes the fair value of its financial assets according to the hierarchy established by the FASB, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1 | Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to directly access. | |
Level 2 | Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; valuations for interest-bearing securities based on non-daily quoted prices in active markets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | |
Level 3 | Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, the Company is required to use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities, or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets. If these quoted prices are not available, the Company is required to use another valuation technique, such as an income approach or a market approach.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. As of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), the Company’s financial assets included only money market funds, which are classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy.
Leases
The Company leases its facilities under cancelable and non-cancelable operating leases. For leases that contain rent escalation or rent concession provisions, the Company records the total rent expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The Company records the difference between the rent paid and the straight-line rent as a deferred rent liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Leasehold improvements are included in property and equipment, net.
Fair value measurements
The Company does not have any financial instruments, such as investments in debt or equity securities or derivative instruments that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The carrying amounts of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. Based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for its credit facility with similar terms and remaining maturities, and considering the Company’s credit risk, the carrying value of the credit facility approximates fair value and was determined to be a Level 2 measurement.
Fair value measurements (unaudited)
The Company categorizes the fair value of its financial assets according to the hierarchy established by the FASB, which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:
Level 1 | Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to directly access. | |
Level 2 | Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; valuations for interest-bearing securities based on non-daily quoted prices in active markets; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. | |
Level 3 | Valuations based on inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. |
A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. In circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, the Company is required to use the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset, quoted prices for similar liabilities, or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets. If these quoted prices are not available, the Company is required to use another valuation technique, such as an income approach or a market approach.
The carrying amounts of the Company’s accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. As of September 30, 2014, the Company’s financial assets included only money market funds, which are classified within Level 1 of the hierarchy.
Goodwill, acquired intangible assets and other long-lived assets
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but the Company performs an annual qualitative assessment of its goodwill during the fourth quarter of each calendar year to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry demand, that would indicate that it would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, including goodwill. If events or circumstances do not indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered to be impaired and no further testing is required. If further testing is required, the Company performs a two-step process. The first step involves comparing the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the test is performed by comparing the carrying value of the goodwill in the reporting unit to its implied fair value. An impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value. For the purpose of impairment testing, the Company has determined that it has one reporting unit. There has been no impairment of goodwill for any periods presented.
The Company’s long-lived assets consist of property and equipment and acquired intangible assets. Acquired intangible assets with definite lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining estimated economic life of the underlying products and technologies. The Company reviews its definite-lived long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset group is measured by comparing its carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted cash flows that the asset group is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. There has been no impairment of long-lived assets for any periods presented.
Warranty
The Company generally provides 12-month warranty coverage on all of its products except in the European Union where the Company provides a two-year warranty. The Company’s warranty provides for repair or replacement of the associated products during the warranty period. The Company establishes a liability for estimated product warranty costs at the time product revenue is recognized. The warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates and the related use of materials, labor costs and freight incurred in correcting any product failure. Should actual product failure rates, use of materials, or other costs differ from the Company’s estimates, additional warranty liabilities could be required, which would reduce its gross profit.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is comprised of product revenue, net of returns and sales incentives.
Revenue is derived from the sale of capture devices, as well as the related implied post contract support (PCS). The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. Evidence of an arrangement consists of an order from its distributors, resellers or online customers. The Company considers delivery to have occurred once title and risk of loss has been transferred. Customer deposits are included in accrued liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and are recognized as revenue when all the criteria for recognition of revenue are met.
The Company’s standard terms and conditions of sale do not allow for product returns and it generally does not allow product returns other than under warranty. However, the Company grants limited rights to return product for certain large retailers and distributors. Estimates of expected future product returns are recognized at the time of sale based on analyses of historical return trends by customer class. Upon recognition, the Company reduces revenue and cost of sales for the estimated return. Return trends are influenced by product life cycle status, new product introductions, market acceptance of products, sales levels, product sell-through, the type of customer, seasonality, product quality issues, operational policies and procedures, and other factors. Return rates can fluctuate over time, but are sufficiently predictable to allow the Company to estimate expected future product returns.
For customers who purchase products directly from the Company’s website, transfer of risk of loss is determined to be upon delivery to the customer’s address. The Company defers those sales made to customers who purchase products from its website in the last four days of the reporting period for which the Company estimates delivery to occur in the following period. The Company uses estimates to determine when shipments are delivered based on third-party metrics for average transit time. Additionally, the Company provides a 30-day money back guarantee for web-based sales for which the Company reduces revenue by an estimate of potential future product returns related to the web-based sales, based on analyses of historical return trends and seasonality. Estimates for web-based sale returns and estimates to derive web sale shipment delivery dates may differ from actual results.
The Company’s camera products include multiple elements. Each element in a multiple element arrangement must be evaluated to determine whether it represents a separate unit of accounting. An element constitutes a separate unit of accounting when it has standalone value and delivery of an undelivered element is both probable and delivery is within the Company’s control.
The Company has determined its multiple element arrangements generally include two separate units of accounting: The first element is the hardware component (camera and accessories) and the embedded firmware essential to the functionality of the camera delivered at the time of sale. The second element is the implied right for the customer to receive post contract support included with the purchase of the Company’s camera products. PCS includes the right to receive, on a when and if available basis, future unspecified firmware upgrades and features as well as bug fixes, email and telephone support.
The Company accounts for each element separately and allocate fees from the arrangement based on the relative selling price of each element. Revenue allocated to an undelivered element is recognized over an estimated service period. The Company recognizes revenue for delivered elements only when all contractual obligations have been completed.
The Company uses a hierarchy to determine the allocation of revenue. The hierarchy is as follows: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (VSOE), (ii) third-party evidence of selling price (TPE) and (iii) best estimate of the selling price (BESP).
i. | VSOE generally exists only when a company sells a deliverable separately and is the price actually charged by the company for that deliverable. The Company does not sell its deliverables separately and, as such, do not have VSOE. |
ii. | TPE can be substantiated by determining the price that other parties sell similar or substantially similar offerings. The Company does not believe that there is accessible TPE evidence for similar deliverables since there are not comparable deliverables sold by other companies. |
iii. | BESP reflects the Company’s best estimates of what the selling prices of elements would be if they were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. The Company believes that BESP is the most appropriate methodology for determining the allocation of revenue for its multiple element arrangements. |
The Company has allocated revenue between its two elements using the relative selling price method which is based on the BESP for all deliverables. Revenue allocated to the delivered hardware and the related essential software is recognized at the time of sale provided the conditions for recognition of revenue have been met. Revenue allocated to PCS is deferred and recognized on a straight-line basis over the estimated term of the support period, which is estimated to be one year based on historical experience. At December 31, 2012, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), deferred implied PCS revenue was $3.8 million, $6.4 million and $7.4 million, respectively.
The Company’s process for determining the BESP for its deliverables involves multiple factors that may vary depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable. Key factors considered by the Company in developing the BESP for PCS include evaluating the level of support provided to customers and analyzing the amount of time and cost that is allocated to the Company’s efforts to develop the undelivered elements, determining the cost of its support efforts, and then adding an appropriate level of gross profit to these costs.
Sales incentives
The Company offers sales incentives through various programs, consisting primarily of cooperative advertising and marketing development fund programs. The Company records cooperative advertising and marketing development fund programs with customers as a reduction to revenue unless it receives an identifiable benefit in exchange for credits claimed by the customer and can reasonably estimate the fair value of the identifiable benefit received, in which case the Company will record it as a marketing expense. In addition, the Company offers price protection discounts to certain customers when new capture device models are released and the customer has remaining inventory on hand of the older capture device model. The Company estimates price protection discounts, which are recorded as a reduction of revenue, by evaluating inventory currently held by the customer subject to price protection. The Company records reductions to revenue for sales incentives when the related revenue is recognized.
Cost of revenue
Cost of revenue includes actual product cost, the cost of shipping, depreciation and amortization, warehousing and processing inventory, warranty replacement costs, excess and obsolete inventory write-downs, certain allocated costs and license fees paid to third parties.
Shipping costs
The Company records amounts billed to customers for shipping costs as revenue in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company classifies related shipping and handling costs incurred as cost of revenue in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Deferred revenue
Deferred revenue is comprised of customer deposits, undelivered post contract support and undelivered web sale shipments. The cost of revenue related to deferred web sales is included in inventory.
Research and development
Research and development expense includes internal and external costs. Internal costs include employee related expenses, equipment costs, depreciation expense and allocated facility costs. External research and development expenses consist of costs associated with consultants, tooling and prototype materials.
Substantially all research and development expense is related to new research and development efforts and the designing of significant improvements to existing products. Research and development expense to establish the technological feasibility of the Company’s products are expensed as incurred. To date, the period between achieving technological feasibility and the release of products for sale has been short and development costs qualifying for capitalization have been insignificant.
Advertising costs
Advertising costs consist of costs associated with print, television and ecommerce media advertisements and are expensed as incurred. A significant amount of the Company’s promotional expenses result from payments under event, resort and athlete sponsorship contracts. Accounting for sponsorship payments is based upon specific contract provisions. These sponsorship arrangements are considered to be executory contracts and, as such, the costs are recognized as performance under the contract is received. The costs associated with preparation of sponsorship activities, including the supply of GoPro products, media team support and activation fees are considered costs of producing advertising and are expensed as incurred. Prepayments made under sponsorship agreements are included in prepaid expenses or other assets depending on the period to which the prepayment applies. Advertising costs were $23.7 million, $46.9 million, $55.5 million, $38.7 million and $32.3 million for 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and 2014 (unaudited), respectively.
Stock-based compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation activity using the fair value method, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards based on estimated fair values. This method requires companies to estimate the fair value of stock-based compensation on the date of grant using an option pricing model. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to measure stock-based compensation. The Black-Scholes model determines the fair value of share-based payment awards based on the fair value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant and is affected by assumptions regarding a number of highly complex and subjective variables. These variables include, but are not limited to, the fair value of the underlying common stock, expected volatility over the term of the awards and actual and projected employee stock option exercise behaviors. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of the stock-based awards represent management judgment. As a result, if factors change and different assumption are used, the stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. Compensation expense relating to employee stock awards is recorded on a straight-line basis in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Stock awards issued to non-employees are accounted for at fair value. The Company believes that the fair value of the awards is more reliably measured than the fair value of services received. The Company records compensation expense based on the then-current fair values of the stock awards at each financial reporting date. Compensation recorded during the service period is adjusted in subsequent periods for changes in the stock award’s fair value until the earlier of the date at which the non-employee’s performance is complete or a performance commitment is reached, which is generally when the stock option award vests. Compensation expense relating to non-employee stock awards is recorded on a straight-line basis in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The Company recognizes a benefit from stock-based compensation as additional paid-in capital if an incremental tax benefit is realized by following the ordering provisions of the tax law. In addition, the indirect effects of stock-based compensation deductions are reflected in the income tax provision for purposes of measuring the windfall at settlement of awards.
Sales taxes
Sales taxes collected from customers and remitted to respective governmental authorities are not included in revenue and are reflected as a liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Foreign currency
The Company and the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. Local currency transactions of the Company’s international operations are remeasured into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the date of the transaction. For those wholly-owned subsidiaries with assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, non-monetary assets are remeasured into U.S. dollars using historical rates of exchange. Monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured into U.S. dollars using exchange rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. Transaction gains and losses were not material for all periods presented and are included in other income (expense), net, in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Income taxes
The Company utilizes the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. Management makes estimates, assumptions and judgments to determine the Company’s provision for income taxes and also for deferred tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowances recorded against the Company’s deferred tax assets. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent the Company believes that recovery is not likely, the Company must establish a valuation allowance.
The calculation of the Company’s current provision for income taxes involves the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments while taking into account current tax laws, interpretation of current tax laws and possible outcomes of future tax audits. The Company has established reserves to address potential exposures related to tax positions that could be challenged by tax authorities. Although the Company believes its estimates, assumptions and judgments to be reasonable, any changes in tax law or its interpretation of tax laws and the resolutions of potential tax audits could significantly impact the amounts provided for income taxes in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
The calculation of the Company’s deferred tax asset balance involves the use of estimates, assumptions and judgments while taking into account estimates of the amounts and type of future taxable income. Actual future operating results and the underlying amount and type of income could differ materially from the Company’s estimates, assumptions and judgments thereby impacting the Company’s financial position and results of operations.
The Company has adopted ASC 740-10 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” that prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the Company’s income tax return, and also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
The Company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company has not incurred any interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in any of the periods presented.
Recent accounting pronouncements
In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued a new accounting standard update on the financial statement presentation of unrecognized tax benefits. The new guidance provides that a liability related to an unrecognized tax benefit would be presented as a reduction of a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward if such settlement is required or expected in the event the uncertain tax position is disallowed. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2014 and it should be applied prospectively to unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date with retrospective application permitted. The Company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2014. The guidance had no material impact to the Company’s financial position or results of operations in the first quarter of 2014.
On May 28, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new accounting standard update on revenue from contracts with customers, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. The new guidance adheres to the core principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this principle, the new guidance lists five steps that entities should follow, including identifying the contract with a customer, identifying the performance obligations in the contract, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognizing revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2017, with retrospective application permitted. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new guidance (unaudited).
In June 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard update on the accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period is treated as a performance condition. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The new guidance becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
In August 2014, the FASB issued new guidance related to the disclosures around going concern. The new standard update provides guidance around management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements (unaudited).
Correction of error (unaudited)
During the preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements for the period ended June 30, 2014, the Company determined that within the consolidated statement of cash flows previously disclosed for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, net cash provided by operating activities was understated by $3.2 million and net cash used for investing activities was understated by the same amount. The Company has properly presented its consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and determined that this revision is not material to prior periods.
|
Inventories, net consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Components |
$ | 3,240 | $ | 8,000 | $ | 9,515 | ||||||
Finished goods |
57,172 | 103,994 | 107,499 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Inventories, net |
$ | 60,412 | $ | 111,994 | $ | 117,014 | ||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Prepaid income taxes |
$ | 9,529 | $ | — | $ | 25,064 | ||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
7,226 | 15,173 | 14,981 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses |
1,947 | 2,739 | 4,715 | |||||||||
Deposits |
1,193 | 2,049 | 1,584 | |||||||||
Prepaid licenses |
544 | 1,091 | 1,834 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
1,285 | 915 | 879 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 21,724 | $ | 21,967 | $ | 49,057 | |||||||
|
Property and equipment, net consisted of the following;
Useful life (in years) |
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
3–7 | $ | 7,595 | $ | 20,111 | $ | 22,342 | |||||||||
Computers, software, equipment and furniture |
2–7 | 4,757 | 11,988 | 20,724 | ||||||||||||
Tooling |
1–4 | 4,197 | 8,799 | 14,860 | ||||||||||||
Construction in progress |
6,356 | 2,151 | 3,790 | |||||||||||||
Tradeshow equipment |
2–5 | 2,308 | 2,613 | 2,792 | ||||||||||||
Automobiles |
3–5 | 717 | 856 | 967 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
25,930 | 46,518 | 65,475 | ||||||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(3,490 | ) | (14,407 | ) | (25,136 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 22,440 | $ | 32,111 | $ | 40,339 | |||||||||||
|
Goodwill at December 31, 2012, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) was as follows:
(In thousands) | ||||
Goodwill at December 31, 2012 |
$ | 4,233 | ||
Acquisition |
9,862 | |||
|
|
|||
Goodwill at December 31, 2013 |
$ | 14,095 | ||
Adjustments (unaudited) |
— | |||
|
|
|||
Goodwill at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
$ | 14,095 | ||
|
Acquired intangible assets at December 31, 2012, 2013 and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) were as follows:
December 31, 2012 |
Weighted useful life (in years) |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Gross |
Accumulated amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
$ | 5,330 | $ | (1,629 | ) | $ | 3,701 | 4.2 | ||||||||
Tradename |
664 | (243 | ) | 421 | 3.2 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
170 | (104 | ) | 66 | 1.2 | |||||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
150 | (137 | ) | 13 | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Domain name |
15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 6,329 | $ | (2,113 | ) | $ | 4,216 | ||||||||||
|
December 31, 2013 |
Weighted
useful life |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Gross |
Accumulated amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
$ | 5,330 | $ | (2,517 | ) | $ | 2,813 | 3.2 | ||||||||
Tradename |
664 | (376 | ) | 288 | 2.2 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
170 | (161 | ) | 9 | 0.2 | |||||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
311 | (166 | ) | 145 | 1.8 | |||||||||||
Domain name |
15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 6,490 | $ | (3,220 | ) | $ | 3,270 | ||||||||||
|
September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
Weighted
useful life |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Gross | Accumulated amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Developed technology |
$ | 5,330 | $ | (3,183 | ) | $ | 2,147 | 2.5 | ||||||||
Tradename |
664 | (476 | ) | 188 | 1.5 | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
170 | (170 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
311 | (227 | ) | 84 | 1.1 | |||||||||||
Domain name |
15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
$ | 6,490 | $ | (4,056 | ) | $ | 2,434 | ||||||||||
|
The estimated future amortization expense of acquired intangible assets to be charged to cost of revenue and operating expenses as of December 31, 2013, is as follows:
(in thousands) | Cost of revenue |
Operating expenses |
Total | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Years ending December 31, |
||||||||||||
2014 |
$ | 888 | $ | 223 | $ | 1,111 | ||||||
2015 |
888 | 197 | 1,085 | |||||||||
2016 |
888 | 22 | 910 | |||||||||
2017 |
149 | — | 149 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 2,813 | $ | 442 | $ | 3,255 | |||||||
|
The estimated future amortization expense of acquired intangible assets to be charged to cost of revenue and operating expenses as of September 30, 2014 (unaudited), is as follows:
(in thousands) | Cost of revenue |
Operating expenses |
Total | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Years ending December 31, |
||||||||||||
2014 (remaining 3 months) |
$ | 221 | $ | 54 | $ | 275 | ||||||
2015 |
888 | 197 | 1,085 | |||||||||
2016 |
888 | 22 | 910 | |||||||||
2017 |
149 | — | 149 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 2,146 | $ | 273 | $ | 2,419 | |||||||
|
Other long-term assets consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
POP displays |
$ | 13,106 | $ | 22,379 | $ | 19,517 | ||||||
Deposits |
1,920 | 2,698 | 5,492 | |||||||||
Long-term licenses |
— | 4,000 | 4,062 | |||||||||
Deferred financing charges |
1,378 | 947 | — | |||||||||
Long-term deferred tax assets |
554 | 736 | 4,736 | |||||||||
Deferred public offering costs |
— | 1,395 | — | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 16,958 | $ | 32,155 | $ | 33,807 | |||||||
|
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
December 31, |
September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Accrued payables |
$ | 33,112 | $ | 49,975 | $ | 45,180 | ||||||
Employee related liabilities |
2,716 | 11,932 | 24,217 | |||||||||
Customer deposits |
1,372 | 1,316 | 3,566 | |||||||||
Warranty liability |
1,734 | 3,691 | 5,138 | |||||||||
Taxes payable |
2,561 | 7,766 | 11,340 | |||||||||
Accrued sponsorship expense |
504 | 2,909 | 1,697 | |||||||||
Accrued sales incentives |
3,314 | 4,909 | 5,066 | |||||||||
Sales commissions |
2,579 | 2,454 | 2,037 | |||||||||
Other |
822 | 1,439 | 1,687 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 48,714 | $ | 86,391 | $ | 99,928 | |||||||
|
|
The Company had the following shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of equity instruments:
(in thousands) | December 31, 2013 |
September 30, 2014 |
||||||
|
||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Stock options outstanding |
26,724 | 27,518 | ||||||
Restricted stock units outstanding |
270 | 3,900 | ||||||
Stock options, restricted stock and RSUs available for future grants |
1,306 | 13,403 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
28,300 | 44,821 | |||||||
|
A summary of the Company’s stock option activity and related information is as follows:
Shares available for grant |
Options outstanding | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(shares in thousands) | Shares | Weighted- average exercise price |
Weighted- average grant- date fair value |
Total intrinsic value of options exercised (in thousands) |
Weighted- average remaining contractual term (in years) |
Aggregate intrinsic value (in thousands) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2010: |
3,268 | 13,043 | $ | 0.66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized |
12,010 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Options granted |
(14,100 | ) | 14,100 | 0.93 | $ | 1.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock and early exercised options granted subject to repurchase |
(1,244 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs granted |
(270 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
— | (46 | ) | 0.24 | $ | 60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled |
736 | (736 | ) | 0.72 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2011: |
400 | 26,361 | $ | 0.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized |
2,100 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
(1,418 | ) | 1,418 | 5.10 | $ | 5.02 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
— | (2,486 | ) | 1.11 | $ | 30,605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled |
891 | (891 | ) | 1.43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2012: |
1,973 | 24,402 | $ | 1.00 | 8.33 | $ | 310,454 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized |
2,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted |
(2,906 | ) | 2,906 | 15.14 | $ | 8.45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised |
— | (345 | ) | 2.23 | $ | 4,564 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled |
239 | (239 | ) | 6.31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2013: |
1,306 | 26,724 | $ | 2.47 | 7.55 | $ | 367,395 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional shares authorized (unaudited) |
21,970 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Granted (unaudited) |
(5,058 | ) | 5,058 | 19.91 | $ | 10.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
RSUs granted (unaudited) |
(5,147 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercised (unaudited) |
— | (3,932 | ) | 0.92 | $ | 84,219 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeited/Cancelled (unaudited) |
332 | (332 | ) | 11.77 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2014 (unaudited): |
13,403 | 27,518 | $ | 5.79 | 7.38 | $ | 2,419,222 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2013 |
20,605 | $ | 0.84 | 7.26 | $ | 316,812 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013 |
25,798 | $ | 2.32 | 7.52 | $ | 358,624 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercisable at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
19,356 | $ | 1.49 | 6.70 | $ | 1,784,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Vested and expected to vest at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
26,546 | $ | 5.45 | 7.33 | $ | 2,342,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following is a further breakdown of the options outstanding at December 31, 2013:
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
(options in thousands) | Options outstanding |
Weighted- average remaining contractual life (in years) |
Weighted- average exercise price |
Options exercisable |
Weighted- average exercise price |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Range of exercise prices |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–0.66 |
11,451 | 6.98 | $ | 0.62 | 10,594 | $ | 0.62 | |||||||||||||
0.76–0.76 |
9,757 | 7.46 | 0.76 | 8,706 | 0.76 | |||||||||||||||
1.52–2.96 |
2,119 | 8.05 | 1.91 | 1,071 | 1.83 | |||||||||||||||
8.30–8.30 |
574 | 8.80 | 8.30 | 184 | 8.30 | |||||||||||||||
13.72–13.72 |
891 | 9.15 | 13.72 | 28 | 13.72 | |||||||||||||||
15.40–15.40 |
611 | 9.44 | 15.40 | 22 | 15.40 | |||||||||||||||
15.59–15.59 |
472 | 9.64 | 15.59 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
16.19–16.19 |
849 | 9.88 | 16.19 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–16.19 |
26,724 | 7.55 | $ | 2.47 | 20,605 | $ | 0.84 | |||||||||||||
|
The following is a further breakdown of the options outstanding at September 30, 2014 (unaudited):
Options outstanding | Options exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
(options in thousands) | Options outstanding |
Weighted- average remaining contractual life (in years) |
Weighted- average exercise price |
Options exercisable |
Weighted- average exercise price |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Range of exercise prices |
||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–0.66 |
8,901 | 6.37 | $ | 0.62 | 8,814 | $ | 0.62 | |||||||||||||
0.76–0.76 |
8,712 | 6.72 | 0.76 | 8,310 | 0.76 | |||||||||||||||
1.52–2.96 |
1,767 | 7.31 | 1.91 | 1,147 | 1.87 | |||||||||||||||
8.30–8.30 |
504 | 8.05 | 8.30 | 243 | 8.30 | |||||||||||||||
13.72–13.72 |
871 | 8.40 | 13.72 | 347 | 13.72 | |||||||||||||||
15.40–15.40 |
572 | 8.69 | 15.40 | 204 | 15.40 | |||||||||||||||
15.59–15.59 |
431 | 8.90 | 15.59 | 122 | 15.59 | |||||||||||||||
16.19–16.19 |
761 | 9.14 | 16.19 | 13 | 16.19 | |||||||||||||||
16.22–16.22 |
1,125 | 9.33 | 16.22 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
16.39–16.39 |
651 | 9.52 | 16.39 | 14 | 16.39 | |||||||||||||||
18.40–18.40 |
2,800 | 9.68 | 18.40 | 142 | 18.40 | |||||||||||||||
38.84–41.98 |
192 | 9.81 | 40.85 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
43.96–65.23 |
231 | 9.84 | 49.40 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.18–65.23 |
27,518 | 7.38 | $ | 5.79 | 19,356 | $ | 1.49 | |||||||||||||
|
A summary of the Company’s restricted stock and early-exercised stock options subject to repurchase activity is as follows:
(in thousands except for weighted average grant date fair value) | Shares | Weighted- average grant date fair value |
Aggregate intrinsic value |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2010 |
— | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||
Granted |
1,244 | 1.68 | ||||||||||
Vested |
(600 | ) | 0.98 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2011 |
644 | 2.44 | 711 | |||||||||
Vested |
(212 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2012 |
432 | 2.44 | 5,274 | |||||||||
Granted |
430 | 16.19 | 6,962 | |||||||||
Vested |
(375 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2013 |
487 | 11.03 | 7,628 | |||||||||
Vested (unaudited) |
(215 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Non-vested shares at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
272 | 13.76 | 25,424 | |||||||||
|
The following table summarizes the activities of the Company’s RSUs:
(in thousands except for weighted average grant date fair value) | Shares | Weighted- average grant date fair value |
||||||
|
||||||||
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2013 |
270 | $ | 1.52 | |||||
Granted (unaudited) |
5,147 | 17.39 | ||||||
Vested (unaudited) |
(1,517 | ) | 18.41 | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Non-vested shares at September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
3,900 | 16.01 | ||||||
|
The Company estimated the fair value of these shares using a Monte Carlo valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
Dividend yield |
None | |||
Expected volatility |
50.9% | |||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.69% | |||
Expected term (years) |
10 | |||
Grant date fair value of underlying shares |
$ | 18.40 | ||
|
|
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, restricted stock and RSUs for the three years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013 and the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited), as follows:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense by type of award |
||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
$ | 8,518 | $ | 8,165 | $ | 8,468 | $ | 5,843 | $ | 11,504 | ||||||||||
ESPP |
— | — | — | — | 873 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
457 | 991 | 2,419 | 1,504 | 4,906 | |||||||||||||||
RSUs |
— | — | — | — | 34,860 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
8,975 | 9,156 | 10,887 | 7,347 | 52,143 | |||||||||||||||
|
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense as reported in the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
$ | 122 | $ | 333 | $ | 690 | $ | 530 | $ | 555 | ||||||||||
Research and development |
261 | 1,452 | 3,003 | 1,737 | 5,486 | |||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
7,690 | 6,335 | 5,670 | 4,077 | 6,293 | |||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
902 | 1,036 | 1,524 | 1,003 | 39,809 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total stock-based compensation expense |
8,975 | 9,156 | 10,887 | 7,347 | 52,143 | |||||||||||||||
Total tax benefit recognized |
(2,897 | ) | (1,091 | ) | (1,104 | ) | (838 | ) | (14,774 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in net income |
$ | 6,078 | $ | 8,065 | $ | 9,783 | $ | 6,509 | $ | 37,369 | ||||||||||
|
The fair value of the options granted was estimated as of the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model assuming the assumptions listed in the following table:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Expected life (years) |
5.0–6.1 | 5.1–6.1 | 5.3–6.1 | 5.3–6.1 | 5.3–6.3 | |||||||||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.1%–2.4% | 0.8%–2.4% | 0.8%–2.4% | 0.8%–2.0% | 1.7%–2.0% | |||||||||||||||
Volatility |
56%–59% | 56%–60% | 56%–60% | 56%-60% | 54%–56% | |||||||||||||||
Dividend yield |
0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | |||||||||||||||
Expected forfeiture rate |
5% | 5%–7% | 6% | 6% | 5%–6% | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average fair value |
$0.98 | $5.08 | $8.45 | $8.20 | $10.58 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
Income before income tax consisted of the following:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 38,791 | $ | 38,714 | $ | 57,251 | ||||||
Foreign |
— | 14,496 | 34,078 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 38,791 | $ | 53,210 | $ | 91,329 | |||||||
|
Income tax expense consisted of the following:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 16,687 | $ | 19,984 | $ | 28,856 | ||||||
State |
4,323 | (493 | ) | 1,634 | ||||||||
Foreign |
— | 3,578 | 8,058 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current |
21,010 | 23,069 | 38,548 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
(5,962 | ) | (2,247 | ) | (7,268 | ) | ||||||
State |
(869 | ) | 126 | (861 | ) | |||||||
Foreign |
— | — | 332 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Total deferred |
(6,831 | ) | (2,121 | ) | (7,797 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 14,179 | $ | 20,948 | $ | 30,751 | ||||||
|
Income tax expense reconciles to the amount computed by applying the federal statutory rate (35%) to income before income taxes as follows:
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentage) | $ | % | $ | % | $ | % | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation to statutory rate: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax at federal statutory rate |
$ | 13,577 | 35.0% | $ | 18,623 | 35.0% | $ | 31,965 | 35.0% | |||||||||||||||
State taxes, net of federal benefit |
2,229 | 5.8 | 1,384 | 2.6 | 2,344 | 2.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Impact of foreign operations |
— | — | (211 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (113 | ) | (0.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
540 | 1.4 | 1,385 | 2.6 | 2,982 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
S corporation status benefit |
(1,082 | ) | (2.8 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
S corporation conversion—DTA setup |
(965 | ) | (2.5 | ) | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
Tax credits |
(211 | ) | (0.5 | ) | (415 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (5,637 | ) | (6.2 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other |
91 | 0.3 | 182 | 0.3 | (790 | ) | (0.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 14,179 | 36.6% | $ | 20,948 | 39.4% | $ | 30,751 | 33.7% | ||||||||||||||||
|
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||
(in thousands) | 2012 | 2013 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Components of deferred tax assets and liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Net operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 746 | $ | 252 | ||||
Stock-based compensation |
3,477 | 3,475 | ||||||
Accruals and reserves |
6,973 | 15,463 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Gross deferred tax assets |
11,196 | 19,190 | ||||||
Valuation allowance |
(204 | ) | — | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
10,992 | 19,190 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(1,998 | ) | (3,063 | ) | ||||
Intangible assets |
(1,214 | ) | (550 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(3,212 | ) | (3,613 | ) | ||||
|
|
|||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 7,780 | $ | 15,577 | ||||
|
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the unrecognized income tax benefits during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2013 are as follows:
December 31, | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Gross balance at January 1 |
$ | — | $ | 966 | $ | 4,439 | ||||||
Gross increase related to current year tax positions |
171 | 3,473 | 5,280 | |||||||||
Gross increase related to prior year tax positions |
795 | — | 179 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
$ | 966 | $ | 4,439 | $ | 9,898 | |||||||
|
|
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual commitments as of December 31, 2013:
(in thousands) | Total | 1 year (fiscal 2014) |
2-3 years (fiscal 2015 and 2016) |
4-5 years (fiscal 2017 and 2018) |
More than 5 years (beyond fiscal 2018) |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Term loan principal and interest(1) |
$ | 118,606 | $ | 63,652 | $ | 54,954 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Operating leases(2) |
32,243 | 7,681 | 13,368 | 10,614 | 580 | |||||||||||||||
Sponsorship commitments(3) |
34,423 | 18,526 | 15,596 | 301 | — | |||||||||||||||
License financing arrangement(4) |
3,600 | 3,600 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other contractual commitments(5) |
4,365 | 1,896 | 2,469 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital equipment purchase commitments(6) |
3,607 | 3,607 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 196,844 | $ | 98,962 | $ | 86,387 | $ | 10,915 | $ | 580 | ||||||||||
|
(1) | See Note 9, “Financing arrangements.” Interest payments were calculated using the applicable rate as of December 31, 2013. |
(2) | The Company leases its facilities under long-term operating leases, which expire at various dates through May 2019. The lease agreements frequently include leasehold improvement incentives, escalating lease payments, renewal provisions and other provisions which require the Company to pay taxes, insurance, maintenance costs or defined rent increases. |
(3) | The Company sponsors sporting events, resorts and athletes as part of its marketing efforts. In many cases, the Company enters into multi-year agreements with event organizers and athletes. |
(4) | In August 2013, the Company entered into a license agreement with the Santa Clara Stadium Authority which gave it rights during the agreement term to season tickets for a National Football League team. The cost of the license was $4.0 million, of which $3.6 million remains to be paid as of December 31, 2013 and was recorded as a short-term liability on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. |
(5) | In 2013, the Company purchased software licenses and engaged outside consultants to assist with upgrading or implementing its financial and IT systems, which require payments over multiple years. |
(6) | The Company enters into contracts to acquire equipment for tooling and molds as part of its manufacturing operations. In addition, the Company incurs purchase commitments related to the manufacturing of its POP displays by third parties. The Company has revised the previously disclosed amount for capital equipment purchase commitments as of December 31, 2013 to correct this amount. |
The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual commitments as of September 30, 2014 (unaudited):
(in thousands) | Total | 1 year (remaining 3 months fiscal 2014) |
2-3 years (fiscal 2015 and 2016) |
4-5 years (fiscal 2017 and 2018) |
More than 5 years (beyond fiscal 2018) |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases(1) |
28,652 | 2,325 | 14,737 | 10,997 | 593 | |||||||||||||||
Sponsorship commitments(2) |
18,228 | 3,001 | 14,103 | 1,124 | — | |||||||||||||||
Other contractual commitments(3) |
7,738 | 292 | 6,075 | 1,371 | — | |||||||||||||||
Capital equipment purchase commitments(4) |
6,307 | 6,307 | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 60,925 | $ | 11,925 | $ | 34,915 | $ | 13,492 | $ | 593 | ||||||||||
|
(1) | The Company leases its facilities under long-term operating leases, which expire at various dates through May 2019. The lease agreements frequently include leasehold improvement incentives, escalating lease payments, renewal provisions and other provisions which require the Company to pay taxes, insurance, maintenance costs or defined rent increases. |
(2) | The Company sponsors sporting events and athletes as part of its marketing efforts. In many cases, the Company enters into multi-year agreements with event organizers and athletes. |
(3) | The Company purchases software licenses and engages outside consultants to assist with upgrading or implementing its financial and IT systems, which require payments over multiple years. |
(4) | The Company enters into contracts to acquire equipment for tooling and molds as part of its manufacturing operations. In addition, the Company incurs purchase commitments related to the manufacturing of its POP displays by third parties. |
The following table summarizes the warranty liability activity:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||
Beginning balances |
$ | 116 | $ | 589 | $ | 1,937 | $ | 3,870 | ||||||||
Charged to cost of revenue |
1,644 | 2,821 | 7,380 | 6,978 | ||||||||||||
Settlements of warranty claims |
(1,171 | ) | (1,473 | ) | (5,447 | ) | (5,465 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Ending balances |
$ | 589 | $ | 1,937 | $ | 3,870 | $ | 5,383 | ||||||||
|
|
Revenue by geographic region, based on ship-to destinations, was as follows:
Year ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 168,450 | $ | 314,135 | $ | 557,285 | $ | 328,006 | $ | 482,769 | ||||||||||
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
51,328 | 157,587 | 311,674 | 218,884 | 193,844 | |||||||||||||||
Asia and Pacific area countries |
14,460 | 54,294 | 116,778 | 77,395 | 83,679 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ | 234,238 | $ | 526,016 | $ | 985,737 | $ | 624,285 | $ | 760,292 | |||||||||||
|
Customers with revenue equal to or greater than 10% of total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012 and 2013, and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and September 30, 2014 (unaudited) were as follows:
Years ended December 31, | Nine months ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2013 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||||
A (retailer) |
15% | 15% | 17% | 15% | 19% | |||||||||||||||
B (distributor) |
* | * | * | 10% | * | |||||||||||||||
|
* | Less than 10% of total revenue for the period indicated |
|
Based upon these calculations, the purchase price of the transaction was allocated as follows:
(in thousands) | Estimated useful life (in years) |
Purchase price |
||||||
|
||||||||
Purchased intangible assets: |
||||||||
Developed technology |
6 | $ | 5,330 | |||||
Customer relationships |
3 | 170 | ||||||
Tradename |
5 | 664 | ||||||
Noncompete agreements |
2 | 150 | ||||||
Goodwill (non-tax deductible) |
4,233 | |||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
(488 | ) | ||||||
Other assets and liabilities acquired, net of cash |
(146 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets acquired |
$ | 9,913 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Cash paid |
$ | 7,955 | ||||||
Options issued |
339 | |||||||
CineForm note |
760 | |||||||
Deferred cash (holdback) |
859 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total consideration issued in the acquisition |
$ | 9,913 | ||||||
|
Based upon these calculations, the purchase price of the transaction was allocated as follows:
(in thousands) | Estimated useful life (in years) |
Purchase price |
||||||
|
||||||||
Purchased intangible asset: |
||||||||
Noncompete agreements |
2 | $ | 161 | |||||
Goodwill (non-tax deductible) |
9,862 | |||||||
Other assets and liabilities acquired, net of cash |
84 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total assets acquired |
$ | 10,107 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|