| Debt
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
|
|||
Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization. Visa Inc. (“Visa” or the “Company”) is a global payments technology company that connects consumers, businesses, banks and governments around the world, enabling them to use digital currency instead of cash and checks. Visa and its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries, including Visa U.S.A. Inc. (“Visa U.S.A.”), Visa International Service Association (“Visa International”), Visa Worldwide Pte. Limited (“VWPL”), Visa Canada Corporation (“Visa Canada”), Inovant LLC (“Inovant”) and CyberSource Corporation (“CyberSource”), operate the world’s largest retail electronic payments network. The Company provides financial institutions with payment processing platforms that encompass consumer credit, debit, prepaid and commercial payments, and facilitates global commerce through the transfer of value and information among financial institutions, merchants, consumers, businesses and government entities. The Company does not issue cards, set fees, or determine the interest rates consumers will be charged on Visa-branded cards, which are the independent responsibility of the Company’s issuing clients. In order to respond to industry dynamics and enhance Visa’s ability to compete, Visa undertook a reorganization in October 2007, and in March 2008 the Company completed its initial public offering, or the IPO. See Note 2—The Reorganization. In July 2010, the Company completed its acquisition of CyberSource in order to expand the Company’s online payment, fraud, and security management capabilities and to accelerate its growth in eCommerce. The results of CyberSource are included in the Company’s results from the acquisition date. See Note 6—CyberSource Acquisition.
Consolidation and basis of presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Visa Inc. and its consolidated entities and are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company consolidates all entities that are controlled by ownership of a majority voting interest as well as variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Non-controlling interests are reported as a component of equity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications, not affecting net income, have been made to prior period information to conform to the current period presentation format, including reclassification of $85 million and $115 million of contractor expense, which was previously reported in professional and consulting fees, to personnel for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company has one reportable segment, “Payment Services”. The Company’s activities are interrelated and each activity is dependent upon and supportive of the other. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based on analysis of Visa Inc. as a single global business.
Use of estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future actual results could materially differ from these estimates. The use of estimates in specific accounting policies is described further below as appropriate.
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and certain highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted cash—litigation escrow. The Company deposited funds from the IPO and its own funds into an escrow account from which settlements of, or judgments in, the covered litigation will be paid. See Note 4—Retrospective Responsibility Plan for discussion of covered litigation. The escrow funds are held in money market investments together with the income earned, less applicable taxes payable, and classified as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet. The amount of the escrow account, equivalent to the actual undiscounted amount of payments expected to be made beyond one year from the balance sheet date for settled claims, is classified as a non-current asset. Interest earned on escrow funds is included in investment income, net, on the consolidated statement of operations.
Investments and fair value. The Company measures certain required assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are reported under a three-level valuation hierarchy. The classification of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents (money market funds), mutual fund equity securities and exchange-traded equity securities are based on quoted prices and are therefore classified as Level 1.
Level 2—Inputs to the valuation methodology can include: (1) quoted prices in active markets for similar (not identical) assets or liabilities; (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 2 assets include U.S. government-sponsored debt securities for which fair value is based on quoted prices in active markets for similar assets, and other observable inputs. Foreign exchange derivative instruments in an asset or liability position are also classified in Level 2 and are valued using inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data.
Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and cannot be corroborated by observable market data. Inputs reflect the use of significant management judgment via the use of pricing models for which the assumptions include estimates of market participant assumptions. Level 3 assets include the Company’s auction rate securities, corporate debt securities, mortgage backed securities and other asset backed securities. Level 3 liabilities include the Visa Europe put option. See Note 3—Visa Europe.
Effective fiscal 2010, the Company adopted guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that allows companies to use net asset value per share as a fair value measurement without further adjustment as a practical expedient. The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Additional disclosures required are not presented because the related investments are not material to the overall consolidated financial statements.
Furthermore, the Company adopted FASB guidance to disclose significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The guidance also clarified existing disclosure requirements for the disaggregation of assets and liabilities presented and discussion of inputs and valuation techniques. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements.
Available-for-sale securities include investments in debt and marketable equity securities. These securities are recorded at cost at the time of purchase and are carried at fair value. The Company classifies its debt and marketable equity securities as available-for-sale to meet its operational needs. Investments with original maturities greater than 90 days and stated maturities less than one year from the balance sheet date are current assets, while those with stated maturities greater than one year from the balance sheet date are non-current assets. Unrealized gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gain or loss. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned and are included in investment income, net on the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company evaluates its debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment, or OTTI, on an ongoing basis. OTTI is assessed when fair value is below amortized cost. OTTI can be triggered when a company has the intent to sell a security, is more likely than not required to sell the security before recovery of the amortized cost basis, or does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The Company has not presented required separate disclosures because its gross unrealized loss positions in debt securities for the periods presented are not material. In addition, the credit and non-credit loss components of debt securities on the balance sheet for which OTTI was previously recognized were not material. The Company had no OTTI for available-for-sale debt securities during fiscal 2010. The Company recognized OTTI of $9 million during fiscal 2009 primarily related to corporate debt, mortgage backed and asset backed securities, and $9 million during fiscal 2008 primarily related to auction rate securities.
Trading assets include mutual fund equity security investments related to various employee compensation and benefit plans. The trading activity of these investments is dependent upon the actions of the Company’s employees. Interest and dividend income and changes in fair value are recorded in investment income, net, and offset in personnel expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company uses the equity method of accounting for investments in other entities when it holds between 20% and 50% ownership in the entity or when it exercises significant influence. Under the equity method, the Company’s share of each entity’s profit or loss is reflected in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated statements of operations. The equity method of accounting is also used for flow-through entities such as limited partnerships and limited liability companies when the investment ownership percentage is equal to or greater than 5% of outstanding ownership interests, regardless of whether the Company has significant influence over the investees.
The Company accounts for investments in other entities under the historical cost method of accounting when it holds less than 20% ownership in the entity or for flow-through entities when the investment ownership is less than 5%, and the Company does not exercise significant influence. These investments consist of equity holdings in non-public companies and are recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company regularly reviews investments accounted for under the cost and equity methods for possible impairment, which generally involves an analysis of the facts and changes in circumstances influencing the investment, expectations of the entity’s cash flows and capital needs, and the viability of its business model.
Financial instruments. The Company considers the following to be financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash-litigation escrow, trading and available-for sale investments, the Reserve Primary Fund (see Note 7—Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets), accounts receivable, non-marketable equity investments, customer collateral, accounts payable, debt, settlement guarantees, derivative instruments, the Visa Europe put option, and settlement receivable and payable. The estimated fair value of such instruments at September 30, 2010 approximates their carrying value as reported on the consolidated balance sheets except as otherwise disclosed, or as deemed impracticable to estimate the fair value, such as for non-marketable equity investments. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements.
Settlement receivable and payable. The Company operates systems for clearing and settling customer payment transactions. Net settlements are generally cleared within one to two business days, resulting in amounts due to and from clients. These settlement receivables and payables are stated at cost and are presented gross on the consolidated balance sheets.
Customer collateral. The Company holds cash deposits and other non-cash assets from certain clients in order to ensure their performance of settlement obligations arising from credit, debit and travelers cheque product clearings. The cash collateral assets are restricted and fully offset by corresponding liabilities and both balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheets. Non-cash collateral assets are held on behalf of the Company by a third party and are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 13—Settlement Guarantee Management.
Property, equipment and technology, net. Property, equipment and technology, net are recorded at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, which are computed on a straight-line basis over the asset’s estimated useful life. Depreciation and amortization of technology, furniture, fixtures and equipment are computed over estimated useful lives ranging from 2 to 7 years. Capital leases are amortized over the lease term and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or lease term. Building improvements are depreciated between 3 and 40 years, and buildings are depreciated over 40 years. Improvements that increase functionality of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over the asset’s remaining useful life. Land and construction-in-progress are not depreciated. Fully depreciated assets are retained in property, equipment and technology, net, until removed from service.
Technology includes purchased and internally developed software, including technology assets acquired in the July 2010 CyberSource acquisition. Internally developed software represents software primarily used by the VisaNet electronic payment network. Internal and external costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred. Qualifying costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized. Once the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the technology’s estimated useful life.
The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. If the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of an asset or asset group, an impairment loss is recognized. The loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Leases. The Company enters into operating and capital leases for the use of premises, software and equipment. Rent expense related to lease agreements which contain lease incentives is recorded on a straight-line basis.
Intangible assets, net. The Company records identifiable intangible assets at fair value on the date of acquisition and evaluates the useful life of each asset. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis and are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of tradename, customer relationships and Visa Europe franchise right acquired in the October 2007 reorganization. The Company tests each category of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an aggregate basis, which may require the allocation of cash flows and/or an estimate of fair value to those assets or asset group. Impairment exists if the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the carrying value. The Company relies on a number of factors when completing impairment assessments, including a review of discounted future cash flows, business plans and use of present value techniques. The Company evaluated its indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment as of July 1, 2010 and concluded there was no impairment as of that date.
Finite-lived intangible assets include those acquired in the July 2010 CyberSource acquisition, and consist of customer relationships, tradenames and reseller relationships. These intangibles have useful lives ranging from 5 years to 15 years. Since the acquisition of CyberSource, no events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment exists. See Note 6—CyberSource Acquisition and Note 9—Intangible Assets, Net.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level annually as of July 1st, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. Impairment is reviewed using a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment exists, and the second step is not performed. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The Company relies on a number of factors when completing impairment assessments including a review of discounted future cash flows, business plans and use of present value techniques.
The Company evaluated its goodwill for impairment on July 1, 2010 and concluded there was no impairment as of that date. Subsequent to this annual assessment, the Company completed the CyberSource acquisition on July 21, 2010, which resulted in additional goodwill. The Company allocates goodwill to reporting units based on the reporting unit expected to benefit from the acquisition. No recent events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment exists as reflected by the Company’s overall business performance and market capitalization.
Volume and support incentives. The Company enters into incentive agreements with clients, merchants, and other business partners designed to build payments volume and to increase product acceptance. These incentives are generally accounted for as reductions of operating revenues, or expenses where an identifiable benefit can be established. The Company generally capitalizes certain incentive payments under these agreements if certain criteria are met. The capitalization criteria include the existence of future benefits to Visa, the existence of legally enforceable recoverability clauses, such as early termination clauses, management’s ability and intent to enforce the recoverability clauses and the ability to generate future earnings from the agreement in excess of the deferred amounts. Incentives are accrued systematically and rationally based on management’s estimate of the clients’ performance. These accruals are regularly reviewed and estimates of performance are adjusted as appropriate. Capitalized amounts are amortized over the period of contractual recoverability.
Accrued litigation. The Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party and records a loss contingency when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These judgments are subjective, based on the status of such legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of the Company’s defenses and consultation with corporate and external legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings may materially differ from the Company’s estimates. Litigation accruals associated with settled obligations to be paid over periods longer than one year are initially recorded using the present value of future payment obligations. The obligation is accreted to its full payment value with the corresponding accretion charge included in interest expense on the consolidated statement of operations. The Company expenses legal costs as incurred in professional and consulting fees. See also Note 22—Legal Matters.
Revenue recognition. The Company’s operating revenues are comprised principally of service revenues, data processing revenues, international transaction revenues and other revenues, reduced by costs incurred under volume and support incentives. The Company recognizes revenue when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Service revenues predominantly represent payments by clients with respect to their card programs carrying marks of the Visa brand and are based principally upon spending on Visa-branded cards for goods and services. Current quarter service revenues are primarily assessed using a calculation of pricing applied to the prior quarter’s payments volume. The Company also earns revenues from assessments designed to support ongoing acceptance and volume growth initiatives. These revenues are recognized in the same period the related volume is transacted.
Data processing revenues represent revenues earned for authorization, clearing, settlement, transaction processing services and other maintenance and support services that facilitate transaction and information processing among the Company’s clients globally and Visa Europe. These revenues are recognized in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered. Data processing revenues also include revenues earned for transactions processed by CyberSource’s online payment gateway.
International transaction revenues are assessed to clients on cardholder transactions where the cardholder’s issuer country is different from the merchant’s country. Revenues from these cross-border transactions are recognized in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.
Other revenues primarily include revenues earned from Visa Europe in connection with the Visa Europe Framework Agreement (see Note 3—Visa Europe), and fees from cardholder services and licensing and certification. Other revenues also include optional service or product enhancements, such as extended cardholder protection and concierge services. Other revenues are recognized in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.
Advertising, marketing and promotion. The Company expenses costs for the production of advertising as incurred. The cost of media advertising is expensed when the advertising takes place. Sponsorship costs are recognized over the period in which the Company benefits from the sponsorship rights. Promotional items are expensed as incurred, when the related services are received, or when the related event occurs.
Income taxes. The Company’s income tax expense consists of two components: current and deferred. Current income tax expense represents taxes to be paid for the current period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the respective tax basis of existing assets and liabilities, and operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. In assessing whether deferred tax assets are realizable, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance is recorded for the portions that are not expected to be realized based on the level of historical taxable income, projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary differences are deductible, and allowable tax planning strategies.
Where interpretation of the tax law may be uncertain, the Company recognizes, measures and discloses income tax uncertainties. The Company accounts for interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and, in certain states, combined state tax returns. Foreign taxes paid are generally deducted to reduce federal income taxes payable.
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The Company’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are actuarially evaluated, incorporating various critical assumptions including the discount rate and the expected rate of return on plan assets (for qualified pension plans). The discount rate is based on matching the duration of a pool of high quality corporate bonds to the expected benefit payment stream, and is used to determine the present value of the Company’s future benefit obligations. The expected rate of return on pension plan assets considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. Any difference between actual and expected plan experience, including asset return experience, in excess of a 10% corridor is recognized in net periodic pension cost over the expected average employee future service period, approximately 8 years for United States plans. Other assumptions involve demographic factors such as retirement, mortality, attrition and the rate of compensation increases. The Company evaluates assumptions annually and modifies them as appropriate.
The Company recognizes the funded status of its benefit plans in its consolidated balance sheet as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within equity. The Company immediately recognizes settlement losses when it settles pension benefit obligations, including making lump-sum cash payments to plan participants in exchange for their rights to receive specified pension benefits, when certain thresholds are met. The Company began including annual disclosures about the fair value of its pension plan assets in fiscal 2010, as required. See Note 12—Pension, Postretirement and Other Benefits.
Foreign currency remeasurement and translation. The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar for the majority of its foreign operations. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the applicable functional currency are converted to the functional currency at the exchange rate on the transaction date. At period end, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured to the functional currency using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Gains and losses related to conversion and remeasurement are recorded in administrative and other in the consolidated statements of operations.
The functional currency for Visa Canada is the Canadian dollar. Translation from the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar is performed for balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange rate for the period. Resulting translation adjustments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets.
Derivative financial instruments. The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency rate changes on non-functional currency denominated forecasted operating revenues and expenses. Derivatives are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of derivative instruments are accounted for either in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets, or in the consolidated statements of operations (in the corresponding account where revenue or expense is hedged, or to administrative and other for hedge amounts determined to be ineffective) depending on whether they are designated and qualify for hedge accounting. Fair value represents the difference in the value of the contracts at the contractual rate and the value at current market rates, and generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date based on broker quotes for the same or similar instruments.
Additional disclosures that demonstrate how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows have not been presented because the impact of derivative instruments is immaterial to the overall consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of comprehensive income. See Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments.
Guarantees and indemnifications. The Company recognizes an obligation for guarantees and indemnifications at inception if the fair value is estimable, regardless of the probability of occurrence. The Company indemnifies issuing and acquiring clients from settlement losses suffered by the failure of any other customer to honor drafts, travelers cheques, or other instruments processed in accordance with Visa’s operating regulations. The estimated fair value of the liability for settlement indemnification is included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and is described in Note 13—Settlement Guarantee Management. The Company also indemnifies Visa Europe for any claims brought against Visa Europe arising out of the provision of services by Visa Inc.’s customer financial institutions, as described in Note 3—Visa Europe.
Share-based compensation. The Company recognizes share-based compensation cost using the fair value method of accounting. The Company recognizes compensation cost for awards with only service conditions on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Compensation cost for performance and market condition based awards is initially estimated based on target performance and is adjusted as appropriate based on management’s best estimate throughout the performance period. See Note 18—Share-based Compensation.
Earnings per share. The Company calculates earnings per share using the two-class method to reflect the different rights of each class and series of outstanding common stock. The dilutive effect of incremental common stock equivalents is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. See Note 17—Earnings Per Share. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company included unvested instruments granted in share-based payment transactions that have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents in the calculation of earnings per share as a separate class of security. This change did not result in any impact to fiscal 2009 and 2008 full year diluted class A net income per share.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810-10, “Consolidation”, which changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The Company will adopt ASC 810-10 effective October 1, 2010. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The Company will adopt ASU 2009-13 effective October 1, 2010. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, which requires additional information in the roll-forward of Level 3 assets and liabilities, including the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. This ASU impacts disclosures only. The Company will adopt this guidance in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements.
|
|||
Note 2—The Reorganization
In a series of transactions from October 1 to October 3, 2007, Visa undertook a reorganization in which Visa U.S.A., Visa International, Visa Canada and Inovant became direct or indirect subsidiaries of Visa Inc. and the retrospective responsibility plan was established. See Note 4—Retrospective Responsibility Plan. The Company reflected the reorganization as a single transaction occurring on October 1, or the reorganization date, using the purchase method of accounting with Visa U.S.A. as the accounting acquirer. Visa Europe did not become a subsidiary of Visa Inc., but rather remained owned and governed by its European member financial institutions. See Note 3—Visa Europe.
The Company issued different classes and series of common stock in the reorganization reflecting the different rights and obligations of the Visa financial institution members and Visa Europe. Total shares authorized and issued in the reorganization totaled approximately 775 million shares of class B and class C common stock. A significant portion of the common stock issued to Visa Europe was redeemed in October 2008. See Note 16 —Stockholders’ Equity.
|
|||
Note 3—Visa Europe
Under the terms of the reorganization, Visa Europe exchanged its ownership interest in Visa International and Inovant for Visa Inc. common stock as described in Note 2—The Reorganization, a put-call option agreement and a Framework Agreement, as described below.
Visa Europe Put Option Agreement. The Company granted Visa Europe a perpetual put option, which if exercised, will require Visa Inc. to purchase all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of Visa Europe from its members. The Company is required to purchase the shares of Visa Europe no later than 285 days after exercise of the put option. The put option provides a formula for determining the purchase price of the Visa Europe shares, which, subject to certain adjustments, applies Visa Inc.’s forward price-to-earnings multiple, or the P/E ratio (as defined in the option agreement), at the time the option is exercised to Visa Europe’s adjusted sustainable income for the forward 12-month period, or the adjusted sustainable income. The calculation of Visa Europe’s adjusted sustainable income under the terms of the put option agreement includes potentially material adjustments for cost synergies and other negotiated items. Upon exercise, the key inputs to this formula, including Visa Europe’s adjusted sustainable income, will be the result of negotiation between the Company and Visa Europe. The put option provides an arbitration mechanism in the event that the two parties are unable to agree on the ultimate purchase price.
At September 30, 2010, the Company revalued the put option, reducing its estimated fair value to approximately $267 million and recorded corresponding non-cash, other non-operating income of $79 million. This reduction in value was primarily the result of declines in the Company’s P/E ratio during the second half of fiscal 2010 and does not reflect any change in the likelihood that Visa Europe will exercise its option.
While this amount represents the fair value of the put option at September 30, 2010, it does not represent the actual purchase price that the Company may be required to pay if the option is exercised, which could be several billion dollars or more. The fair value of the put option represents the value of Visa Europe’s option, which under certain conditions, could obligate the Company to purchase its member equity interest for an amount above fair value. While the put option is in fact non-transferable, its fair value represents the Company’s estimate of the amount the Company would be required to pay a third party market participant to transfer the potential obligation in an orderly transaction at the measurement date.
The fair value of the put option is computed by comparing the estimated strike price, under the terms of the Put agreement, to the estimated fair value of Visa Europe. The fair value of Visa Europe is defined as the estimated amount a third party market participant might pay in an arm’s length transaction under normal business conditions. A probability of exercise assumption is applied to reflect the possibility that Visa Europe will never exercise its option.
The estimated fair value of the put option represents a Level 3 accounting estimate due to a lack of trading in active markets and a lack of observable inputs in measuring fair value. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements. The valuation of the put option therefore requires substantial judgment. The most subjective of estimates applied in valuing the put option are the assumed probability that Visa Europe will elect to exercise its option and the estimated differential between the P/E ratio and the P/E ratio applicable to Visa Europe on a standalone basis at the time of exercise, which the Company refers to as the “P/E differential”.
Exercise of the put option is at the sole discretion of Visa Europe (on behalf of the Visa Europe shareholders pursuant to authority granted to Visa Europe, under its Articles of Association). The Company estimates the assumed probability of exercise based on reasonably available information including, but not limited to: (i) Visa Europe’s stated intentions; (ii) indications that Visa Europe is preparing to exercise as reflected in its reported financial results; (iii) evaluation of market conditions, including the regulatory environment, that could impact the potential future profitability of Visa Europe; and (iv) qualitative factors applicable to Visa Europe’s largest members, which could indicate a change in their need or desire to liquidate their investment holdings. Factors impacting the assumed P/E differential used in the calculation include material changes in the P/E ratio of Visa Inc. and those of a group of comparable companies used to estimate the forward price-to-earnings multiple applicable to Visa Europe.
In determining the fair value of the put option at September 30, 2010, the Company assumed a 40% probability of exercise by Visa Europe at some point in the future and an estimated long-term P/E differential at the time of exercise of 3.5x. In determining the fair value of the put option at September 30, 2009, the Company assumed a 40% probability of exercise by Visa Europe and an estimated long-term P/E differential at the time of exercise of 5.3x. The decrease in the P/E differential reflects the overall decrease in Visa Inc.’s P/E during the second half of fiscal 2010.
The put option is exercisable at any time at the sole discretion of Visa Europe. As such, the put option liability is included in accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2010. Classification in current liabilities is not an indication of management’s expectation of exercise and simply reflects the fact that the obligation resulting from the exercise of the instrument could become payable within 12 months.
Visa Call Option Agreement. Visa Europe granted to Visa Inc. a perpetual call option under which the Company may be entitled to purchase all of the share capital of Visa Europe. The Company may exercise the call option, in the event of certain triggering events. These triggering events involve the performance of Visa Europe measured as an unremediated decline in the number of merchants or ATM’s in the Visa Europe region that accepts Visa-branded products. The Company believes the likelihood of these triggers occurring to be remote.
The Framework Agreement. The relationship between Visa Inc. and Visa Europe is governed by a Framework Agreement, which provides for trademark and technology licenses and bilateral services as described below.
The Company granted to Visa Europe exclusive, irrevocable and perpetual licenses to use the Visa trademarks and technology intellectual property owned by the Company and certain affiliates within the Visa Europe region for use in the field of financial services, payments, related information technology and information processing services and participation in the Visa system. Visa Europe may sublicense the Visa trademarks and technology intellectual property to its members and other sublicensees under agreed upon circumstances.
The quarterly base fee for these irrevocable and perpetual licenses is recorded in other revenues and is approximately $143 million per year, except for fiscal 2008 during which the fee was $41 million due to an agreed upon formula. A liability of $132 million representing the estimated obligation to provide the licenses during fiscal 2008 at below fair value was included in the total purchase consideration in the reorganization, and fully settled upon redemption of Visa Europe’s class C (series II) and class C (series III) common shares in October 2008.
Beginning November 9, 2010, the quarterly base fee is adjusted annually based on the annual growth of the gross domestic product of the European Union, although the adjustment can never reduce the quarterly base fee below $143 million per year. The Company determined through an analysis of the fee rates implied by the economics of the agreement that the quarterly base fee, as adjusted in future periods based on the growth of the gross domestic product of the European Union, approximates fair value.
Visa Europe must comply with certain agreed upon global rules governing the use and interoperability of the Visa trademarks and interoperability of Visa Inc.’s systems with the systems of Visa Europe. The parties will also guarantee the obligations of their respective clients and members to settle transactions, manage certain relationships with sponsors, clients and merchants, and comply with rules relating to the operation of the Visa enterprise. The Company will indemnify Visa Europe for claims arising from activities in the field of financial payment and processing services brought outside Visa Europe’s region and Visa Europe will indemnify Visa Inc. for any likewise claims brought within Visa Europe’s region. The Company has not recorded liabilities associated with these obligations as the fair value of such obligations was determined to be nominal at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Visa Inc. also provides Visa Europe with authorization, clearing and settlement services for cross-border transactions involving Visa Europe’s region and the rest of the world. During fiscal 2010, Visa Europe substantially deployed its own regional clearing and settlement system and Visa Inc. ceased the provision of clearing and settlement system services for transactions occurring within Visa Europe’s region. The parties are expected to continue to share foreign exchange revenues related to currency conversion for transactions involving European cardholders, as well as other cross-border transactions that take place in Visa Europe’s region, until mid fiscal 2011. The parties also use each others’ value-added processing products and other services. The Company has determined that the value of services exchanged as a result of these various agreements approximates fair value at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
|||
Note 4—Retrospective Responsibility Plan
The Company has established several related mechanisms designed to address potential liability under certain litigation referred to as the “covered litigation”. These mechanisms are included in and referred to as the retrospective responsibility plan, or the plan, and consist of an escrow agreement, a loss sharing agreement, an interchange judgment sharing agreement, the conversion feature of the Company’s shares of class B common stock and the indemnification obligations of the Visa U.S.A. members pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements.
In accordance with the escrow agreement, following the Company’s IPO in fiscal 2008, the Company deposited $3.0 billion of the proceeds of the offering in an escrow account, from which settlements of, or judgments in, the covered litigation are being paid. Under the terms of the plan, when the Company funds the escrow account, the shares of class B common stock are subject to dilution through an adjustment to the conversion rate of the shares of class B common stock to shares of class A common stock. The initial deposit reduced this conversion rate to 0.7143. The escrow funds are held in money market investments along with the income earned, less applicable taxes, and are classified as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet. The amount of the escrow funds classified as a non-current asset is equivalent to the actual, undiscounted amount of covered litigation payments expected to be made beyond one year from the balance sheet date for settled claims. The amount of the escrow was determined by the litigation committee. The litigation committee was established pursuant to the litigation management agreement among Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International and the members of the litigation committee, all of whom are affiliated with, or act for, certain Visa U.S.A. members.
In December 2008, the Company filed a Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Delaware. The amendment enabled the Company to, under certain conditions, deposit operating cash directly into the escrow account resulting in a further reduction in the conversion rate applicable to the Company’s class B common stock.
Subsequent to the initial funding, the Company made additional deposits of operating cash into the escrow account, which had the effect of the Company repurchasing its common stock as follows:
| Fiscal 2011 | Fiscal 2010 | Fiscal 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| October 2010(1) |
May 2010 |
July 2009 |
December 2008 |
|||||||||||||
| (in millions except per share data and conversion rate) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Funding under the plan |
$ | 800 | $ | 500 | $ | 700 | $ | 1,100 | ||||||||
|
Repurchase price per share(2) |
$ | 72.74 | $ | 74.22 | $ | 60.45 | $ | 52.88 | ||||||||
|
Equivalent shares of class A common stock repurchased |
11 | 7 | 12 | 21 | ||||||||||||
|
Conversion rate after funding of class B common stock to class A common stock |
0.5102 | 0.5550 | 0.5824 | 0.6296 | ||||||||||||
|
As-converted class B common stock after funding |
125 | 136 | 143 | 155 | ||||||||||||
| (1) |
On September 21, 2010, the Company announced it will deposit $800 million into the litigation escrow account. The funds were deposited into the escrow account on October 8, 2010. |
| (2) |
Price per share calculated using the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s class A common stock over a pricing period in accordance with the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation. |
The following table sets forth the changes in the escrow account:
| Fiscal 2010 | Fiscal 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Balance at October 1 |
$ | 1,715 | $ | 1,928 | ||||
|
Funding under the plan |
500 | 1,800 | ||||||
|
American Express settlement payments |
(280 | ) | (280 | ) | ||||
|
Discover settlement payments(1) |
— | (1,748 | ) | |||||
|
Interest earned, less applicable taxes |
1 | 15 | ||||||
|
Balance at September 30 |
$ | 1,936 | $ | 1,715 | ||||
|
Less: Current portion of escrow account |
(1,866 | ) | (1,365 | ) | ||||
|
Long-term portion of escrow account |
$ | 70 | $ | 350 | ||||
| (1) |
The Company made payments totaling $1.9 billion related to the Discover settlement during fiscal 2009. Of the $1.9 billion payment, $1.7 billion was funded through the escrow account under the plan and $145 million, $65 million of which was reimbursed by Morgan Stanley evenly over the four fiscal 2009 quarters, was funded from the Company’s operating cash. |
An accrual for covered litigation is recorded when loss is deemed to be probable and reasonably estimable. In making this determination, the Company evaluates information including funding decisions made by the litigation committee. The accrual related to covered litigation could be either higher or lower than the escrow account balance. The Company did not record an additional accrual for covered litigation during fiscal 2010.
The Company, at the request of the litigation committee, may conduct additional sales of class A common stock in order to increase the size of the escrow account, in which case the conversion rate of the class B common stock into class A common stock will be subject to additional dilutive adjustments to the extent of the proceeds from those sales. To the extent that amounts available under the escrow arrangement and agreements in the plan are insufficient to fully resolve the covered litigation, the Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to enforce the indemnification obligations of Visa U.S.A.’s members for such excess amount, including but not limited to enforcing indemnification obligations pursuant to Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation and bylaws and in accordance with their membership agreements.
Visa Inc. has entered into a loss sharing agreement with Visa U.S.A., Visa International and certain Visa U.S.A. members. The loss sharing agreement provides for the indemnification of Visa U.S.A., Visa International and, in certain circumstances, Visa Inc. with respect to: (i) the amount of a final judgment paid by Visa U.S.A. or Visa International in the covered litigation after the operation of the interchange judgment sharing agreement, plus any amounts reimbursable to the interchange judgment sharing agreement signatories; or (ii) the damages portion of a settlement of a covered litigation that is approved as required under Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation by the vote of Visa U.S.A.’s specified voting members. The several obligation of each bank that is a party to the loss sharing agreement will equal the amount of any final judgment enforceable against Visa U.S.A., Visa International or any other signatory to the interchange judgment sharing agreement, or the amount of any approved settlement of a covered litigation, multiplied by such bank’s then-current membership proportion as calculated in accordance with Visa U.S.A.’s certificate of incorporation.
Visa U.S.A. and Visa International also entered into an interchange judgment sharing agreement with certain Visa U.S.A. members that have been named as defendants in the interchange litigation. Under this judgment sharing agreement, Visa U.S.A. members that are signatories will pay their membership proportion of the amount of a final judgment not allocated to the conduct of MasterCard.
|
|||
Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements
The Company measures certain assets and liabilities at fair value. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis.
| Fair Value Measurements at September 30 Using Inputs Considered as |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents and restricted cash |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Money market funds and time deposits |
$ | 5,448 | $ | 5,977 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency debt securities |
$ | 135 | $ | 169 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Canadian government debt securities |
— | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities |
60 | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate debt securities |
$ | — | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage backed securities |
— | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other asset backed securities |
— | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Auction rate securities |
13 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange derivative instruments |
5 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 5,508 | $ | 6,050 | $ | 140 | $ | 192 | $ | 13 | $ | 34 | |||||||||||||
|
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Visa Europe put option |
$ | 267 | $ | 346 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange derivative instruments |
$ | 56 | $ | 96 | ||||||||||||||||||||
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 assets during fiscal 2010.
Level 2 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Government-sponsored debt securities and foreign exchange derivative instruments are classified as Level 2 within the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the government-sponsored debt securities is based on quoted prices in active markets for similar assets. Foreign exchange derivative instruments are valued using inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data. There was no substantive change to the valuation techniques and related inputs used to measure fair value during fiscal 2010.
Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Corporate debt securities, mortgage backed securities, other asset backed securities and auction rate securities are classified as Level 3 due to a lack of trading in active markets and a lack of observable inputs in measuring fair value. Valuations for these securities were provided by the Company’s pricing vendors and are based on significant unobservable inputs. There was no substantive change to the valuation techniques and related inputs used to measure fair value during fiscal 2010.
The Company granted Visa Europe a perpetual put option which is carried at fair value in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets with changes in the fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. See Note 3—Visa Europe. The liability is classified within Level 3 as the assumed probability that Visa Europe will elect to exercise its option and the estimated P/E differential are among several unobservable inputs used to value the put option.
A separate roll-forward of Level 3 investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis is not presented because the primary fiscal 2010 and 2009 activities are the liquidation of the corporate debt securities, mortgage backed securities and other asset backed securities via sales and maturities, and $8 million of other-than-temporary impairment in fiscal 2009. These investments were fully liquidated by September 30, 2010 and resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $1 million to investment income, net, in fiscal 2010. There was no change in fair value or other activity related to the Company’s auction rate securities during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010. The fair value of the Visa Europe put option was revalued from $346 million to $267 million in fiscal 2010, resulting in an $79 million increase to other non-operating income in fiscal 2010. See Note 3—Visa Europe.
Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.
Non-marketable equity investments and investments accounted for under the equity method. The Company applies fair value measurement to its strategic investments which are accounted for under the cost and equity methods. Strategic investments are classified as Level 3 due to the absence of quoted market prices, inherent lack of liquidity, and the fact that inputs used to measure fair value are unobservable and require management judgment. If events or circumstances indicate that these investments may be impaired, the Company revalues the investments using various assumptions including financial metrics and ratios of comparable public companies. During fiscal 2010, certain events and circumstances triggered impairment analyses for certain non-marketable equity securities which resulted in recognized losses of $3 million and $7 million in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Due to a change in the investment relationship with one of its investees during fiscal 2010, the Company reclassified equity securities accounted for as available-for-sale investments with a cost basis of $9 million to an equity method investment. As a result, the Company also reversed net unrealized gains of $15 million, pre-tax, from accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded a loss of $3 million in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.
At September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, non-marketable equity security investments and investments accounted for under the equity method totaled $114 million and $102 million, respectively. These assets are classified in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 7-Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets.
Reserve Primary Fund. After the Reserve Primary Fund, or the Fund, was unable to honor the Company’s request for a full redemption of its investment in 2008, the Company began accounting for its investment in the Fund under the cost method, and considered it a Level 3 asset for which a market price is not readily determinable. The fair value was estimated by discounting the Company’s pro-rata ownership of the Fund’s underlying investment holdings based upon an estimate of inherent risk, resulting in an impairment charge of $29 million in fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009 and 2010, the Company substantially received its remaining pro-rata ownership in the Fund, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax gain of $20 million in investment income, net during fiscal 2010, for amounts received in excess of the carrying value. See Note 7—Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets and Note 22—Legal Matters for additional information regarding this asset.
Long-lived assets such as goodwill, finite-lived intangible assets, and property, equipment and technology are considered non-financial assets. The Company does not have any significant non-financial liabilities. During fiscal 2010 and at September 30, 2010, there was no indication that the Company’s long-lived assets were impaired. Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of Visa’s tradename, customer relationships, and Visa Europe franchise right acquired in the October 2007 reorganization. The Company completed its annual impairment review of its indefinite-lived assets as of July 1, 2010 and concluded there was no impairment.
Available-for-sale investments
Available-for-sale investment securities, which are recorded at fair value, consist of the types of securities presented below. The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale securities are as follows:
| Available-For-Sale (in millions) |
||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency debt securities |
$ | 130 | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | 135 | ||||||||
|
Auction rate securities |
13 | — | — | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 143 | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | 148 | ||||||||
|
Less: current portion of available-for-sale securities |
(124 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities |
$ | 24 | ||||||||||||||
| Available-For-Sale (in millions) |
||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency debt securities |
$ | 160 | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | 169 | ||||||||
|
Canadian government debt securities |
7 | — | — | 7 | ||||||||||||
|
Corporate debt securities |
10 | — | — | 10 | ||||||||||||
|
Mortgage backed securities |
6 | — | — | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
Other asset backed securities |
5 | — | — | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
Auction rate securities |
13 | — | — | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
Equity Securities |
7 | 7 | — | 14 | ||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 208 | $ | 16 | $ | — | $ | 224 | ||||||||
|
Less: current portion of available-for-sale securities |
(56 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities |
$ | 168 | ||||||||||||||
The contractual maturity of available-for-sale debt securities regardless of their balance sheet classification is presented below. Contractual maturities may differ from expected maturities as borrowers may have the right to prepay certain obligations in advance of the contractual due date.
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
September 30, 2010: |
||||||||
|
Due within one year |
$ | 120 | $ | 124 | ||||
|
Due after 1 year through 5 years |
10 | 11 | ||||||
|
Due after 5 years through 10 years |
— | — | ||||||
|
Due after 10 years |
13 | 13 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 143 | $ | 148 | ||||
Trading assets
Trading assets primarily consist of mutual fund investments related to various employee compensation plans. See Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. As of September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009, trading assets totaled $60 million and $59 million, respectively.
Investment income
Investment income, net, consisted of the following:
| For the Years Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
Interest and dividend income on cash and investments |
$ | 26 | $ | 113 | $ | 279 | ||||||
|
Gain on other investments |
20 | 473 | — | |||||||||
|
Investment securities-available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
|
Gross realized gains |
2 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Gross realized losses |
— | — | (3 | ) | ||||||||
|
Investment securities-trading assets: |
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gains |
3 | 8 | — | |||||||||
|
Realized gains (losses) |
1 | (6 | ) | — | ||||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairment on investments and other assets |
(3 | ) | (16 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||
|
Investment income, net |
$ | 49 | $ | 575 | $ | 211 | ||||||
The gain on other investments in fiscal 2009 represents the pre-tax gain from the sale of the Company’s equity interest in VisaNet do Brasil.
|
|||
Note 6—CyberSource Acquisition
On July 21, 2010, the Company completed its acquisition of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of CyberSource Corporation, a leading provider of electronic payment, risk management and payment security solutions to online merchants. The combination was executed to accelerate the growth of Visa’s eCommerce category and enhance the value of the Company’s network, product and service offerings to financial institutions, merchants, partners and consumers.
Total purchase consideration was approximately $2.0 billion, paid with cash on hand as follows:
| (in millions) | ||||
|
Acquisition of approximately 72 million shares of outstanding common stock of CyberSource at $26.00 per share |
$ | 1,866 | ||
|
Fair value of earned stock options settled |
86 | |||
|
Total purchase price |
$ | 1,952 | ||
Total purchase consideration has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets and to liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values on the acquisition date. The excess of purchase consideration over net assets assumed was recorded as goodwill, which represents the value that is expected from expanding the Company’s online payment and related fraud and security management capabilities, and other synergies. The $1.2 billion of additional goodwill represents the only activity to the Company’s goodwill during the fiscal year. The Company allocates goodwill to reporting units based on the reporting unit expected to benefit from the acquisition. Of the $1.2 billion, approximately $0.8 billion was allocated to a second reporting unit. The remainder was allocated to the Company’s original reporting unit to reflect the incremental growth and synergy this acquisition will provide to the Company’s existing business. None of the additional goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation, which is preliminary pending finalization of the valuation analysis.
| (in millions) | ||||
|
Tangible assets and liabilities |
||||
|
Current assets |
$ | 259 | ||
|
Non-current assets |
150 | |||
|
Current liabilities |
(45 | ) | ||
|
Non-current liabilities |
(256 | ) | ||
|
Intangible assets |
605 | |||
|
Goodwill |
1,239 | |||
|
Net assets acquired |
$ | 1,952 | ||
Intangible assets consist of customer relationships, reseller relationships and tradenames, which have useful lives ranging from 5 to 15 years. See Note 9—Intangible Assets, Net. The Company also acquired $122 million of technology assets, which have weighted average useful lives of 7 years, and are recognized in property, equipment and technology, net on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 8—Property, Equipment and Technology, Net. The following table summarizes the fair value of the acquired intangible assets. See Note 9—Intangible Assets, Net.
| Fair Value | Weighted-Average Useful Life |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Customer relationships |
$ | 320 | 10 | |||||
|
Reseller relationships |
95 | 9 | ||||||
|
Tradenames |
190 | 15 | ||||||
|
Total amortizable intangible assets |
$ | 605 | 12 | |||||
In connection with the acquisition, non-vested in-the-money stock options held by CyberSource employees on the acquisition date were terminated and replaced with approximately 1.6 million of the Company’s non-qualified stock options, with a total fair value of approximately $46 million to be expensed over a period of three years from the original grant date of the CyberSource options. See Note 18—Share-based Compensation. The Company also expensed as incurred approximately $13 million of acquisition-related costs during fiscal 2010, which consisted primarily of professional fees related to closing the transaction. There was no contingent consideration related to the acquisition.
The consolidated financial statements include the operating results of CyberSource from the date of the acquisition.
|
|||
Note 7—Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and maintenance |
$ | 72 | $ | 97 | ||||
|
Income tax receivable—(See Note 21—Income Taxes) |
140 | 135 | ||||||
|
Money market investment—Reserve Primary Fund |
— | 69 | ||||||
|
Other |
30 | 65 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 242 | $ | 366 | ||||
Other non-current assets consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Other investments—(See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements) |
$ | 114 | $ | 102 | ||||
|
Pension asset—(See Note 12—Pension, Postretirement and Other Benefits) |
53 | — | ||||||
|
Long-term prepaid expenses and other |
30 | 23 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 197 | $ | 125 | ||||
The money market investment represents the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the Reserve Primary Fund, or the Fund. During fiscal 2008, the Company recorded a $29 million other-than-temporary impairment against the Company’s original investment of $982 million when the Fund failed to honor the Company’s request for a full redemption of its investment. The Company received distributions totaling $89 million and $884 million from the Fund in fiscal 2010 and 2009, respectively, which substantially represented the Company’s remaining pro-rata ownership in the Fund. Total distributions received were in excess of the carrying value of the Company’s investment in the Fund, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax gain of $20 million in investment income, net during fiscal 2010. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements and Note 22—Legal Matters.
The increase in other non-current assets was primarily due to the Company’s U.S. qualified pension plan becoming overfunded upon remeasurement at September 30, 2010.
|
|||
Note 8—Property, Equipment and Technology, Net
Property, equipment and technology, net consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Land |
$ | 71 | $ | 71 | ||||
|
Buildings and building improvements |
648 | 629 | ||||||
|
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements |
687 | 598 | ||||||
|
Construction-in-progress |
75 | 43 | ||||||
|
Technology |
908 | 688 | ||||||
|
Total property, equipment and technology |
2,389 | 2,029 | ||||||
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,032 | ) | (825 | ) | ||||
|
Property, equipment and technology, net |
$ | 1,357 | $ | 1,204 | ||||
At September 30, 2010, property, equipment and technology, net included $143 million in net assets acquired as part of the CyberSource acquisition, which primarily comprise technology assets. Technology consists of both purchased and internally developed software. Internally developed software primarily represents software utilized by the VisaNet electronic payment network. At September 30, 2010, and September 30, 2009, accumulated amortization for technology was $577 million and $434 million, respectively.
At September 30, 2010, estimated future amortization expense on technology placed in service was as follows:
|
Fiscal (in millions) |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Estimated future amortization expense |
$ | 76 | $ | 67 | $ | 62 | $ | 49 | $ | 77 | $ | 331 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, equipment and technology was $265 million, $226 million and $237 million for fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Included in those amounts was amortization expense on technology of $137 million, $128 million and $129 million for fiscal 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
|
|||
Note 9—Intangible Assets, Net
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets consisted of customer relationships of $6.8 billion, Visa tradename of $2.6 billion and a Visa Europe franchise right of $1.5 billion, all of which were acquired as part of the Company’s October 2007 reorganization. Customer relationships represent the value of relationships with clients from the acquired entities. Tradename represents the value of the Visa brand utilized by the acquired entities. Visa Europe’s franchise right represents the value of the right to franchise the use of the Visa brand, use of Visa technology and access to the overall Visa network in the Visa Europe region. The Company did not have any finite-lived intangible assets at September 30, 2009.
In July 2010, the Company acquired finite-lived intangible assets from CyberSource consisting of customer relationships, primarily reflecting its online merchant customer base; reseller relationships, primarily reflecting its referral partnerships that generate new merchant clients; and tradenames, representing the value of the CyberSource and Authorize.Net brands associated with their online payment solutions. See Note 6—CyberSource Acquisition. The fair value of these intangible assets and related accumulated amortization expense was as follows:
| Finite-lived Intangible Assets September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||
| Gross | Accumulated Amortization |
Net | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
Finite-lived intangible assets |
||||||||||||
|
Customer relationships |
$ | 320 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 314 | |||||
|
Reseller relationships |
95 | (2 | ) | 93 | ||||||||
|
Tradenames |
190 | (2 | ) | 188 | ||||||||
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
$ | 605 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 595 | |||||
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
10,883 | |||||||||||
|
Total intangible assets, net |
$ | 11,478 | ||||||||||
Amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets was approximately $10 million in fiscal 2010. At September 30, 2010, estimated future amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets is as follows:
|
Fiscal (in millions) |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Estimated future amortization expense |
$ | 59 | $ | 59 | $ | 59 | $ | 59 | $ | 359 | $ | 595 | ||||||||||||
There was no impairment related to the Company’s indefinite-lived or finite-lived intangible assets during fiscal 2010, 2009 or 2008.
|
|||
Note 10—Accrued and Other Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Visa Europe put option(1)—(See Note 3—Visa Europe) |
$ | 267 | $ | 346 | ||||
|
Accrued operating expenses |
100 | 87 | ||||||
|
Accrued marketing and product expenses |
58 | 103 | ||||||
|
Deferred revenue |
42 | 39 | ||||||
|
Accrued income taxes—(See Note 21—Income Taxes) |
40 | 23 | ||||||
|
Other |
118 | 156 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 625 | $ | 754 | ||||
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Accrued income taxes—(See Note 21—Income Taxes) |
$ | 423 | $ | 304 | ||||
|
Employee benefits |
76 | 119 | ||||||
|
Other |
118 | 49 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 617 | $ | 472 | ||||
| (1) |
The put option is exercisable at any time at the sole discretion of Visa Europe with payment required 285 days thereafter. Classification in current liabilities is not an indication of management’s expectation of exercise and simply reflects the fact that the obligation resulting from the exercise of the instrument could become payable within 12 months. |
|
|||
Note 11—Debt
The Company had outstanding debt as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
5.60% Senior secured notes—Series B, principal and interest payments payable quarterly, due December 2012 |
$ | 15 | $ | 22 | ||||
|
8.28% Secured notes—Series B, principal and interest payments payable monthly, due September 2014 |
13 | 16 | ||||||
|
7.83% Secured notes—Series B, principal and interest payments payable monthly, due September 2015 |
17 | 19 | ||||||
|
Total principal amount of debt |
$ | 45 | $ | 57 | ||||
|
Unamortized discount, debt issuance costs and other costs |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
Total debt |
$ | 44 | $ | 56 | ||||
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
(12 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
|
Long-term debt |
$ | 32 | $ | 44 | ||||
The estimated fair value of the Company’s debt at September 30, 2010 and 2009 is $50 million and $64 million, respectively, based on credit ratings for similar notes.
5.60% Senior Secured Notes-Series B
In December 2002, Visa U.S.A. issued $68 million in series B senior secured notes with a maturity date of ten years. The note is collateralized by the Company’s Colorado facility, which consists of two data centers and an office building, in addition to processing assets and developed software.
8.28% Secured Notes-Series B and 7.83% Secured Notes-Series B
In September 1994 and September 1995, a real estate partnership owned jointly by Visa U.S.A. and Visa International issued notes that are secured by certain office properties and facilities used by the Company in California, known as the 1994 Lease Agreement and 1995 Lease Agreement, respectively. Series B of each of these notes, totaling $26 million and $27 million, respectively, was issued with a stated maturity of September 23, 2014 and September 15, 2015, respectively. These notes are payable monthly with interest-only payments for the first ten years and payments of interest and principal for the remainder of the term. In May 2008, amendments for both of these lease agreements were executed under which remaining obligations are guaranteed by Visa Inc. The amendment to the 1994 Lease Agreement also stipulates that the interest rate will be adjusted upward if the long-term senior unsecured debt rating of Visa Inc. falls below certain stipulated levels.
Future Principal Payments
Future principal payments on the Company’s outstanding debt are as follows:
|
Fiscal |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions) |
$ | 12 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 5 | $ | 45 | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. Commercial Paper Program
Visa International maintains a U.S. commercial paper program to support its working capital requirements and for general corporate purposes. This program allows the Company to issue up to $500 million of unsecured debt securities, with maturities up to 270 days from the date of issuance and at interest rates generally extended to companies with comparable credit ratings. The Company had no outstanding obligations under this program during and at the end of fiscal 2010 and 2009.
Revolving Credit Facilities
In 2008, Visa Inc. entered into a $3.0 billion five-year revolving credit facility (the “February 2008 Agreement”). The February 2008 Agreement matures on February 15, 2013 and contains covenants and events of defaults customary for facilities of this type. The participating lenders in this revolving credit facility include affiliates of certain holders of the Company’s class B and class C common stock, and certain of the Company’s clients or affiliates of its clients. This revolving credit facility is maintained to provide liquidity in the event of settlement failures by its clients, to back up the commercial paper program and for general corporate purposes.
Loans under the five-year facility may be in the form of: (1) Base Rate Advance, which will bear interest at a rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% and the Bank of America prime rate; (2) Eurocurrency Advance, which will bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR (as adjusted for applicable reserve requirements) plus an applicable cost adjustment and an applicable margin of 0.11% to 0.30% based on our credit rating; or (3) U.S. Swing Loan, Euro Swing Loan, or Foreign Currency Swing Loan, which will bear interest at the rate equal to the applicable Swing Loan rate for that currency plus the same applicable margin plus additionally for Euro and Sterling loans, an applicable reserve requirement and cost adjustment. The Company also agrees to pay a facility fee on the aggregate commitment amount, whether used or unused, at a rate ranging from 0.04% to 0.10% and a utilization fee on loans at a rate ranging from 0.05% to 0.10% based on the Company’s credit rating. Currently, the applicable margin is 0.15%, the facility fee is 0.05% and the utilization fee is 0.05%.
There were no borrowings under the revolving credit facility and the Company was in compliance with all related covenants during and at the end of fiscal 2010 and fiscal 2009.
|
|||
Note 12—Pension, Postretirement and Other Benefits
The Company sponsors various qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans which provide for retirement and medical benefits for substantially all employees residing in the United States. The Company uses a September 30 measurement date for its pension and postretirement benefit plans.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan
The defined benefit pension plan benefits are based on years of service, age, and eligible compensation. Employees hired before January 1, 2008 earn benefits based on their pay during their last five years of employment. Employees hired or rehired on or after January 1, 2008 earn benefits based on a cash balance formula. Effective January 1, 2011, all employees will accrue benefits under the cash balance formula and will cease to accrue benefits under any other formula. An employee’s cash balance account is credited with an amount equal to 6% of eligible compensation plus interest based on 30-year Treasury securities. The funding policy is to contribute annually no less than the minimum required contribution under ERISA.
Effective October 1, 2008, the pension plan was amended to provide death benefits of 100% of the value of the accrued benefit to a participant’s beneficiary or estate. Prior to this amendment, the plan provided a 50% death benefit only to a participant’s spouse.
On January 12, 2010, the Company approved an amendment to the pension plan to conform the plan to the Pension Protection Act of 2006. The combined effects of the resulting plan remeasurement, as well as the completion of the annual census data update, reduced fiscal 2010 net periodic pension cost by $19 million.
Effective August 1, 2010, participation in the plan was extended to former employees of CyberSource following its acquisition by the Company in July 2010. See Note 6—CyberSource Acquisition. The additional participants are not expected to materially increase the fiscal 2010 or future annual pension cost.
Postretirement Benefits Plan
The postretirement benefits plan provides medical benefits for retirees and dependents who meet minimum age and service requirements. Benefits are provided from retirement date until age 65. Retirees must contribute on a monthly basis for the same coverage that is generally available to active employees and their dependents. The Company’s contributions are funded on a current basis.
In August 2008, the Company amended its postretirement benefits plan to discontinue the employer subsidy for all participants not yet retirement eligible at December 31, 2008, resulting in a curtailment gain of $2 million in fiscal 2008.
Summary of Plan Activities
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation/Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation-beginning of fiscal year |
$ | 739 | $ | 667 | $ | 43 | $ | 50 | ||||||||
|
Service cost |
45 | 51 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost |
40 | 46 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
Plan amendments |
(12 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
3 | 64 | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Settlements |
— | 4 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Benefit payments |
(72 | ) | (93 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
|
Benefit obligation-end of fiscal year |
$ | 743 | $ | 739 | $ | 34 | $ | 43 | ||||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
$ | 743 | $ | 720 | NA | NA | ||||||||||
|
Change in Plan Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets-beginning of fiscal year |
$ | 703 | $ | 624 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Actual return on plan assets |
73 | 6 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Company contribution |
62 | 166 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
Benefit payments |
(72 | ) | (93 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets-end of fiscal year |
$ | 766 | $ | 703 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Funded status at end of fiscal year |
$ | 23 | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | |||||
|
Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Noncurrent asset |
$ | 53 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Current liability |
(10 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||
|
Noncurrent liability |
(20 | ) | (32 | ) | (30 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||
|
Funded status at end of fiscal year |
$ | 23 | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | |||||
Amounts recognized in accumulated comprehensive income before tax:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Net actuarial loss (gain) |
$ | 240 | $ | 276 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | ||||||
|
Prior service credit |
(51 | ) | (48 | ) | (20 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 189 | $ | 228 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | ||||||
Amounts from accumulated other comprehensive income to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2011:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
$ | 19 | $ | (1 | ) | |||
|
Prior service credit |
(9 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
|
Total |
$ | 10 | $ | (4 | ) | |||
Benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets with obligations in excess of plan assets:
| Pension Benefits | ||||||||
| September 30, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets |
||||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year |
$ | 30 | $ | 21 | ||||
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year |
— | — | ||||||
|
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets |
||||||||
|
Benefit obligation, end of year |
$ | 30 | $ | 739 | ||||
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year |
— | 703 | ||||||
Net periodic pension and other postretirement plan cost:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost |
$ | 45 | $ | 51 | $ | 50 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost |
40 | 46 | 40 | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Expected return on assets |
(50 | ) | (45 | ) | (42 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prior service credit |
(9 | ) | (8 | ) | (13 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
16 | 14 | 7 | (1 | ) | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net benefit cost |
42 | 58 | 42 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Curtailment gain |
— | — | — | — | — | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
Settlement loss |
— | 3 | 27 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 42 | $ | 61 | $ | 69 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 5 | ||||||||||
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Current year actuarial (gain)loss |
$ | (20 | ) | $ | 107 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | |||||
|
Amortization of actuarial (loss)gain |
(16 | ) | (17 | ) | 1 | — | ||||||||||
|
Current year prior service (credit)cost |
(12 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
9 | 8 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income |
$ | (39 | ) | $ | 98 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | |||||
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income |
$ | 3 | $ | 159 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | ||||||
Weighted Average Actuarial Assumptions:
| Fiscal | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
|
Discount rate for benefit obligation(1) |
||||||||||||
|
Pension |
5.25 | % | 5.60 | % | 6.75 | % | ||||||
|
Postretirement |
3.45 | % | 4.43 | % | 6.24 | % | ||||||
|
Discount rate for net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||||||
|
Pension |
5.63 | % | 6.75 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||
|
Postretirement |
4.43 | % | 6.24 | % | 5.99 | % | ||||||
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets(2) |
7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | ||||||
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels for: |
||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation |
4.50 | % | 5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | ||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost(3) |
5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | ||||||
| (1) |
Based on a “bond duration matching” methodology, which reflects the matching of projected plan liability cash flows to an average of high-quality corporate bond yield curves whose duration matches the projected cash flows. |
| (2) |
Primarily based on the targeted allocation, and evaluated for reasonableness by considering such factors as: (i) actual return on plan assets; (ii) historical rates of return on various asset classes in the portfolio; (iii) projections of returns on various asset classes; and (iv) current and prospective capital market conditions and economic forecasts. |
| (3) |
For the net periodic benefit cost for fiscal 2010, rate of increase in compensation is 0% for fiscal 2010 and 5.5% for fiscal 2011 and thereafter. |
The assumed annual rate of future increases in health benefits for the other postretirement benefits plan is 8% for fiscal 2011. The rate is assumed to decrease to 5% by 2016 and remain at that level thereafter. These trend rates reflect management’s expectations of future rates. Increasing or decreasing the healthcare cost trend by 1% would change the postretirement accumulated plan benefit obligation by less than $1 million.
Pension Plan Assets
Plan assets are managed with a long-term perspective to ensure that there is an adequate level of assets to support benefit payments to participants over the life of the pension plan. Plan assets are managed by external investment managers. Investment manager performance is measured against benchmarks for each asset class on a quarterly basis. An independent consultant assists management with investment manager selections and performance evaluations.
Plan assets are broadly diversified to maintain a prudent level of risk and to provide adequate liquidity for benefit payments. The Company generally evaluates and rebalances the plan assets, as appropriate, to ensure that allocations are consistent with target allocation ranges. The current target allocation for plan assets is as follows: equity securities of 50% to 80%, fixed income securities of 25% to 35%, and other, primarily consisting of cash to meet near term expected benefit payments and expenses, of up to 7%. At September 30, 2010, plan asset allocations for the above categories were 64%, 30% and 6% respectively, and within these allocation ranges.
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the plan’s investments at fair value as of September 30, 2010, reflecting unsettled transactions:
| Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents |
$ | 46 | $ | 1 | $ | 47 | ||||||||||
|
Collective investment funds |
307 | 307 | ||||||||||||||
|
Corporate debt securities |
99 | 99 | ||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
111 | 111 | ||||||||||||||
|
Asset backed securities |
$ | 26 | 26 | |||||||||||||
|
Equity securities |
190 | 190 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 236 | $ | 518 | $ | 26 | $ | 780 | ||||||||
Cash equivalents. Securities classified as Level 1 primarily include money market funds traded in active markets. Valuations for these securities are based on quoted market prices in active markets. Securities classified as Level 2 include a government agency discount note, which is a short-term obligation issued at discount from par. This security is traded over-the-counter and the valuation is based on inputs derived from observable market data of related assets.
Collective investment funds. Collective investment funds are unregistered investment vehicles that commingle the assets of multiple fiduciary clients, such as pension and other employee benefits plans, to invest in portfolios of stocks, bonds, or other securities. Although the single collective investment fund held by the plan is ultimately invested in the common stocks of companies in the S&P 500 index, its own unit value is not directly observable, and it is therefore classified as Level 2.
Corporate debt securities. Securities in this category primarily include fixed income securities issued by domestic and foreign corporations. Valuation for these securities are based on quoted prices in active markets for similar assets, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable in the market, and are generally classified as Level 2.
Debt securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies. These securities primarily include debt issued by the U.S. Department of Treasury and securities issued or backed by U.S. government agencies. Valuations for these securities are based on quoted prices in active markets for similar assets, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable in the market. These investments are generally classified within Level 2.
Asset backed securities. Asset backed securities are bonds that are backed by various types of assets and primarily consist of mortgage-backed securities. Valuations for these securities are based on significant unobservable inputs. These investments are classified as Level 3.
Equity securities. Securities are classified as Level 1 and include securities regularly traded on a security exchange. These securities are valued at their last quoted sales price at the reporting date, or if there was no sale on that day, the last reported bid price. This category also includes mutual funds, which are classified as Level 1, as their net asset values are observable in the market, and the access to the investment is not restricted.
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 assets during fiscal 2010. The following table provides a roll-forward of Level 3 investments in fiscal 2010:
| Asset backed securities | ||||
| (in millions) | ||||
|
Balance at October 1, 2009 |
$ | 28 | ||
|
Actual return on plan assets: |
||||
|
Assets held at reporting date |
2 | |||
|
Assets sold during the period |
— | |||
|
Transfers in or / and (out) of Level 3 |
— | |||
|
Purchases, sales and settlements—net |
(4 | ) | ||
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 26 | ||
Cash Flows
| Pension Benefits |
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||
|
Actual employer contributions |
(in millions) | |||||||
|
2010 |
$ | 62 | $ | 4 | ||||
|
2009 |
166 | 4 | ||||||
|
Expected employer contributions |
||||||||
|
2011 |
$ | 55 | $ | 4 | ||||
|
Expected benefit payments |
||||||||
|
2011 |
$ | 102 | $ | 4 | ||||
|
2012 |
95 | 4 | ||||||
|
2013 |
90 | 4 | ||||||
|
2014 |
90 | 4 | ||||||
|
2015 |
82 | 4 | ||||||
|
2016-2020 |
361 | 16 | ||||||
Other Benefits
The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan that covers substantially all of its employees residing in the United States. Personnel costs included $29 million, $28 million and $33 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, for expenses attributable to the Company’s employees under the plan. The Company’s contributions to this plan are funded on a current basis, and the related expenses are recognized in the period that the payroll expenses are incurred.
|
|||
Note 13—Settlement Guarantee Management
The Company indemnifies clients for settlement losses suffered due to failure of any other customer to honor Visa cards, travelers cheques, deposit access products, point-of-sale check service drivers and other instruments processed in accordance with the operating regulations. This indemnification creates settlement risk for the Company due to the difference in timing between the date of a payment transaction and the date of subsequent settlement. The term and amount of the indemnification are unlimited. Settlement at risk (or exposure) is estimated based on the sum of the following inputs: (1) average daily volumes during the quarter multiplied by the estimated number of days to settle plus a safety margin; (2) four months of rolling average chargebacks volume; and (3) the total balance for outstanding travelers cheques.
The Company maintains and regularly reviews global settlement risk policies and procedures to manage settlement exposure, which may require clients to post collateral if certain credit standards are not met. The Company refined its settlement risk policy during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010 to reduce the number of safety margin days when calculating U.S. settlement exposure, and to increase the U.S. debit and credit exposure thresholds for which collateral is required.
The Company’s estimated maximum settlement exposure was approximately $38.7 billion at September 30, 2010 compared to $41.8 billion at September 30, 2009. Of these amounts, $3.0 billion at September 30, 2010 and $3.7 billion at September 30, 2009, are covered by collateral. Had the changes to the settlement risk policy been applied to the prior year, the estimated maximum settlement exposure would have been approximately $33.9 billion at September 30, 2009, of which approximately $2.8 billion would have been covered by collateral. The total available collateral balances presented below are greater than the settlement exposure covered by customer collateral held due to instances in which the available collateral exceeds the total settlement exposure for certain financial institutions at each date presented.
The Company maintained collateral as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Cash equivalents |
$ | 899 | $ | 812 | ||||
|
Pledged securities at market value |
470 | 243 | ||||||
|
Letters of credit |
869 | 703 | ||||||
|
Guarantees |
1,803 | 2,644 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 4,041 | $ | 4,402 | ||||
Cash equivalents collateral is reflected in customer collateral on the consolidated balance sheets as it is held in escrow in the Company’s name. All other collateral is excluded from the consolidated balance sheets. Pledged securities are held by third parties in trust for the Company and clients. Guarantees are provided primarily by parent financial institutions to secure the obligations of their subsidiaries, and the Company routinely evaluates the financial viability of institutions providing the guarantees.
The fair value of the settlement risk guarantee is estimated using a proprietary model which considers statistically derived loss factors based on historical experience, estimated settlement exposures at period end and a standardized grading process for clients (using, where available, third-party estimates of the probability of customer failure). The estimated probability-weighted value of the guarantee was less than $1 million at September 30, 2010 and 2009 and is reflected in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.
|
|||
Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments
The functional currency for the Company is the U.S. dollar (“USD”) for the majority of its foreign operations. The Company transacts business in USD and in various foreign currencies. This activity subjects the Company to exposure from movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The Company’s policy is to enter into foreign exchange forward derivative contracts to manage the variability in expected future cash flows attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates. At September 30, 2010, all derivative instruments outstanding mature within 12 months or less. The Company does not use foreign exchange forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes. All derivatives are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value in prepaid expenses and other current assets or accrued liabilities and the resulting gains or losses from changes in fair value are accounted for depending on whether they are designated and qualify for hedge accounting.
The Company enters into forward contracts to hedge certain operational (“cash flow”) exposures resulting from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Such cash flow exposures result from portions of forecasted revenues and expenses being denominated in or based on currencies other than USD. In fiscal 2009, the Company implemented a rolling hedge strategy program. Under this strategy, the Company seeks to reduce the exchange rate risk from forecasted net exposure of revenues derived from and payments made in foreign currencies during the immediately following 12 months. The aggregate notional amount of the Company’s foreign currency forward contracts outstanding in its exchange rate risk management program was $627 million and $742 million at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The aggregate notional amount of $627 million outstanding at September 30, 2010 is fully consistent with the Company’s strategy and treasury policy aimed at reducing foreign exchange risk below a predetermined and approved threshold. However, actual results for this period could materially differ from the Company’s forecast. As of September 30, 2010, the Company’s cash flow hedges in an asset position totaled $5 million and are classified in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet, while cash flow hedges in a liability position totaled $56 million and are classified in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements.
To qualify for cash flow hedge accounting treatment, the Company formally documents, at inception of the hedge, all relationships between hedging transactions and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. The Company also formally assesses whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods.
The Company uses regression analysis to assess effectiveness prospectively and retrospectively. The effectiveness tests are performed on the foreign exchange forward contracts based on changes in the spot rate of the derivative instrument compared to changes in the spot rate of the forecasted hedged transaction. Forward points are excluded for effectiveness testing and measurement purposes. The excluded forward points are reported immediately in earnings. For fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, the amount by which earnings were reduced relating to excluded forward points and ineffectiveness was $18 million, $18 million and $2 million, respectively.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheet. When the forecasted transaction occurs and is recognized in earnings, the amount in accumulated other comprehensive income related to that hedge is reclassified to operating revenue or expense. The balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net was $40 million at September 30, 2010 and the Company expects to reclassify the entire amount to earnings in the consolidated statement of operations during fiscal 2011 due to the recognition in earnings of the hedged forecasted transactions.
In the event there is recognized ineffectiveness or the underlying forecasted transaction does not occur within the designated hedge period, or it becomes remote that the forecasted transaction will occur, the related gains and losses on the cash flow hedges are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income on the consolidated balance sheet to administrative and other expense on the consolidated statement of operations at that time.
The Company’s derivative financial instruments are subject to both credit and market risk. The Company monitors the credit-worthiness of the financial institutions that are counterparties to its derivative financial instruments and does not consider the risks of counterparty nonperformance to be significant. Notwithstanding the Company’s efforts to manage foreign exchange risk, there can be no absolute assurance that its hedging activities will adequately protect against the risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations. Credit and market risks related to derivative instruments were not considered significant at September 30, 2010.
|
|||
Note 15—Enterprise-wide Disclosures and Concentration of Business
The Company’s long-lived net property, equipment and technology assets are classified by major geographic area as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
U.S. |
$ | 1,301 | $ | 1,128 | ||||
|
Non-U.S. |
56 | 76 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 1,357 | $ | 1,204 | ||||
Revenue by geographic market is primarily based on the location of the issuing financial institution. Certain revenues, primarily international service revenues, are shared by geographic locations based upon the location of the merchant involved in the transaction. Other than the U.S., Visa does not maintain revenues by individual country. Revenues earned in the U.S. was approximately 58%, 58% and 59% of total operating revenues in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
A significant portion of Visa’s operating revenues are concentrated among its largest clients. Loss of business from any of these clients could have an adverse effect on the Company. Revenues from the Company’s top five clients were approximately 30%, 32% and 26% of total operating revenues in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In fiscal 2009, one customer accounted for 10% of the Company’s net operating revenues. The Company did not have any customer that generated greater than 10% of its net operating revenues in fiscal 2010 or fiscal 2008. See Item 1A—Risk Factors.
|
|||
Note 16—Stockholders’ Equity
Reorganization, IPO and Redemptions. As part of the October 2007 reorganization and a subsequent true-up adjustment prior to the March 2008 IPO, the Company issued different regional classes and series of common stock reflecting the different rights and obligations of the Visa financial institution members and Visa Europe.
In the March 2008 IPO, the Company issued approximately 447 million shares of class A common stock at a net offering price of $42.77 (the IPO price of $44.00 per share of class A common stock, less underwriting discounts and commissions of $1.23 per share). Of the net $19.1 billion IPO proceeds received, $13.4 billion was used to partially redeem shares of class B and class C common stock and $3.0 billion was used to fund the litigation escrow account as discussed below.
The IPO also triggered the redemption feature of certain series of class C common stock issued to Visa Europe. In March 2008, the Company reclassified these shares and other redeemable shares, to temporary equity and liability, respectively. In October 2008, the Company redeemed these shares for approximately $2.6 billion. Following the redemption and adoption of the Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation in December 2008, the series designation related to the remaining shares of class C common stock was removed.
Class B Common Stock. The class B common stock is not convertible or transferable until the later of March 25, 2011 or the date on which all of the covered litigation has been finally resolved, although the Company’s board of directors may make exceptions to this transfer restriction after resolution of all covered litigation. This transfer restriction is subject to limited exceptions, including transfers to other holders of class B common stock. After termination of the restrictions, the class B common stock will be convertible into class A common stock if transferred to a person that was not a Visa member or similar person or affiliate of a Visa member or similar person. Upon such transfer, each share of class B common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class A common stock based upon the applicable conversion rate in effect at the time of such transfer.
Funding of the litigation escrow account. Immediately following the IPO in March 2008, the conversion rate applicable to class B common stock was reduced to 0.7143 share of class A common stock for each share of class B common stock to reflect the initial deposit of $3.0 billion into the escrow account. Further adjustment of the conversion rate occurs upon: (i) the completion of any follow-on offering of class A common stock completed to increase the size of the escrow account (or any cash deposit by the Company in lieu thereof) resulting in a further corresponding decrease in the conversion rate; or (ii) the final resolution of the covered litigation and the release of funds remaining on deposit in the escrow account to the Company resulting in a corresponding increase in the conversion rate. The adoption of the Fifth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation in December 2008 provides the Company greater flexibility to fund the escrow account, which the Company has done with various deposits into the escrow account during fiscal 2010 and 2009. The conversion rate applicable to class B common stock outstanding at September 30, 2010 is 0.5550 share of class A common stock, per class B common stock.
Subsequent to the fiscal 2010 year end, on October 8, 2010, the Company funded the escrow account with an additional $800 million, which further reduced the conversion rate applicable to class B common stock outstanding from 0.5550 to 0.5102 share of class A common stock per share of class B common stock. This funding had the effect of a repurchase by the Company of the equivalent of approximately 11 million shares of class A common stock. See Note 4—Retrospective Responsibility Plan.
After giving effect to the October 2010 escrow funding and the corresponding reduction in the conversion rate applicable to class B common stock outstanding, the number of shares of each class and the number of shares of class A common stock outstanding, on an as-converted basis, are as follows:
|
(in millions
except |
Shares Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
Conversion Rate Into Class A Common Stock |
Class A Common Stock As Converted at September 30, 2010(1) |
After giving effect to the October 2010 escrow account funding |
||||||||||||||||
| Conversion Rate Into Class A Common Stock |
Class A Common Stock As Converted(1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Class A common stock |
493 | — | 493 | — | 493 | |||||||||||||||
|
Class B common stock |
245 | 0.5550 | 136 | 0.5102 | 125 | |||||||||||||||
|
Class C common stock |
97 | 1.0000 | 97 | 1.0000 | 97 | |||||||||||||||
| 727 | 716 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
Figures may not sum due to rounding. As-converted class A common stock count calculated based on whole numbers. |
Accelerated Class C Share Release Program. On April 27, 2009, the Company’s board of directors approved a program in which holders of class C common stock were permitted to liquidate up to 30% of their class C common stock between July 1, 2009 and September 30, 2009, subject to certain terms and conditions. Under this program, 40 million shares of class C common stock were released from transfer restrictions. On January 21, 2010, the Company’s board of directors approved a second class C share release program in which the number of shares released from transfer restrictions for any holders of class C common stock was the greater of (a) 50% of the restricted shares of class C common stock held by that stockholder as of March 1, 2010, and (b) 5,000 shares of class C common stock (or in the case of stockholders with fewer than 5,000 shares of class C common stock, all of their shares). Stockholder application was not required. Under this program, 56 million shares of class C common stock were released from transfer restrictions. The release of these shares did not increase the number of outstanding shares on an as-converted basis, and there was no dilutive effect to the outstanding class A common stock share count on an as-converted basis from these transactions.
Of the 96 million shares of class C common stock released from transfer restrictions, 55 million shares have been converted from class C common stock to class A common stock upon the sale or transfer by the holders of class C common stock into the public market through September 30, 2010.
At September 30, 2010, 55 million shares of class C common stock remain subject to the general transfer restrictions that expire on March 25, 2011 under Visa’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation and will not be transferable or convert into class A common stock until such date. This transfer restriction is subject to limited exceptions, including transfers to other holders of class C common stock. The Company’s board of directors may make additional exceptions to this transfer restriction. After termination of the restrictions, the class C common stock will convert into class A common stock if transferred to a person that was not, immediately after the reorganization, a Visa member. In connection with such a transfer, each share of class C common stock will automatically convert into a number of shares of class A common stock on a one-to-one basis, subject to adjustments for stock splits, recapitalizations and similar transactions.
Share repurchase plan. In October 2009, the Company’s board of directors authorized a $1.0 billion share repurchase plan that was to be in place through September 30, 2010. During fiscal 2010, the Company repurchased approximately 12.9 million shares of its class A common stock at an average price of $77.48 per share, using the entire $1.0 billion of authorized funds. Repurchased shares have been retired and constitute authorized but unissued shares. In October 2010, the Company’s board of directors authorized a second $1.0 billion share repurchase plan to be in place through September 30, 2011, subject to extension or expansion at the determination of the Company’s board of directors.
Special IPO Cash and Stock Dividends Received from Cost Method Investees. Several of the Company’s cost method investees are also holders of class C common stock and elected to declare a special cash dividend to return to their owners on a pro rata basis, the proceeds received as a result of the redemption of a portion of their class C common stock. As a result of the Company’s ownership interest in these cost method investees, the Company recorded approximately $1 million, $2 million and $29 million of special cash dividends received from these investees during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, the Company received 24,449 and 525,443 shares of its own class C common stock during fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively, from similar cost method investees and recorded $1 million and $35 million, respectively, as treasury stock. This treasury stock was retired in fiscal 2010 and 2009 and the Company has no class C common treasury stock outstanding at September 30, 2010.
These special cash and stock dividends are recorded as an increase in additional paid-in capital, net of tax, and are not recorded as income in the consolidated statements of operations as they represent the same redemption proceeds and shares issued by the Company as part of the reorganization. Any value recorded upon their return would be the result of appreciation in the Company’s own stock, which is therefore not recorded as income. The value of the treasury stock was calculated based on other class C common stock transactions by other holders of class C common stock with unrelated third parties.
Preferred Stock. Preferred stock may be issued as redeemable or non-redeemable, and it has preference over any class of common stock with respect to the payment of dividends and distribution of the Company’s assets in the event of a liquidation or dissolution. The Company had no shares of preferred stock outstanding during and at the end of fiscal 2010 and 2009.
Voting Rights. The holders of class A common stock have the right to vote on all matters on which stockholders generally are entitled to vote. All holders of class B and class C common stock have no right to vote on any matters, except for certain defined matters, including any consolidation, merger, combination or any decision to exit the core payments business, in which case the holders of class B and class C common stock are entitled to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares of class B or class C common stock held multiplied by the applicable conversion rate in effect on the record date.
Dividends Declared. On October 20, 2010, the Company’s board of directors declared a dividend in the aggregate amount of $0.15 per share of class A common stock (determined in the case of class B and class C common stock on an as-converted basis) to be paid on December 7, 2010 to all holders of record of the Company’s class A, class B and class C common stock as of November 19, 2010. The Company declared and paid $368 million in dividends in fiscal 2010 at a quarterly rate of $0.125 per share.
|
|||
Note 19—Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments
The Company leases certain premises and equipment throughout the world with varying expiration dates. The Company incurred total rent expense of $59 million in fiscal 2010, and $77 million in each fiscal 2009 and 2008, respectively. Future minimum payments on leases and marketing and sponsorship agreements per fiscal year, at September 30, 2010 are as follows:
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating leases |
$ | 57 | $ | 36 | $ | 28 | $ | 14 | $ | 10 | $ | 12 | $ | 157 | ||||||||||||||
|
Capital leases |
13 | 13 | 13 | — | — | — | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marketing and sponsorships |
110 | 106 | 96 | 100 | 68 | 105 | 585 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 180 | $ | 155 | $ | 137 | $ | 114 | $ | 78 | $ | 117 | $ | 781 | ||||||||||||||
Certain sponsorship agreements require the Company to spend a certain amount for advertising and marketing promotion over the term of the contract without specifying the exact year of spend. For these obligations, the Company has estimated the timing of when these amounts will be spent. In addition to fixed payments stated above, certain sponsorship agreements require the Company to undertake marketing, promotional or other activities up to stated monetary values to support events which the Company is sponsoring. The stated monetary value of these activities typically represents the value in the marketplace, which may be significantly in excess of the actual costs incurred by the Company.
Volume and Support Incentives
The Company has agreements with clients for various programs designed to build payments volume and increase the acceptance of its products. These agreements, with original terms ranging from one to thirteen years, provide card issuance, and/or conversion, volume targets and marketing and program support based on specific performance requirements. These agreements are designed to encourage customer business and to increase overall Visa-branded payment volume, thereby reducing unit transaction processing costs and increasing brand awareness for all Visa clients.
Payments made that qualify for capitalization, and obligations incurred under these programs are included on the balance sheet. Obligations under these customer agreements are amortized as a reduction to revenue in the same period as the related revenues are earned, based on management’s estimate of the customer’s performance in accordance with the terms of the incentive agreement. The agreements may or may not limit the amount of customer incentive payments.
The table below sets forth the expected future reduction of revenue for volume and support incentive agreements in effect at September 30, 2010:
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Volume and support incentives |
$ | 1,575 | $ | 1,515 | $ | 1,318 | $ | 895 | $ | 539 | $ | 458 | $ | 6,300 | ||||||||||||||
The actual amounts that are recorded will be greater or less than the estimates above due to customer performance, execution of new contracts, or amendments to existing contracts. Based on these agreements, increases in incentive payments are generally driven by increased payment and transaction volume, and as a result, in the event incentive payments exceed this estimate, such payments are not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Other Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual arrangements with financial institution and other clients pursuant to which the Company may agree to indemnify the client for certain types of losses incurred relating to the services Visa provides or otherwise relating to the Company’s performance under the applicable agreement.
In October 2010, one of the Company’s processing clients tendered a contractual indemnity claim to Visa relating to the Company’s customer call center operational practices. Visa’s agreement with this client provides for contractual indemnity up to approximately $3 million and the Company has reserved for this amount in fiscal 2010. However, the processing client asserts that the Company is responsible for additional amounts. The likelihood of losses that may become payable to this processing client under such claims (or to cardholders or others under additional claims they may bring in connection with the Company’s call center operations) and the amount of potential losses associated with such claims cannot be determined or estimated at this time and the Company has therefore not established any additional accounting reserve for them.
|
|||
Note 20—Related Parties
Visa considers an entity to be a related party for purposes of this Note 20 if that entity owns more than 10% of Visa’s total voting common stock at the end of the fiscal year or if an officer or employee of that entity also serves on the board of directors. The Company considers an investee to be a related party if the Company’s: (i) ownership interest in the investee is greater than or equal to 10%; or (ii) if the investment is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. There were no material operating expenses incurred during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, or material amounts due to or from related parties at the end of fiscal 2010 and 2009.
Ownership. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, no entity owned more than 10% of the Company’s total voting common stock.
Board representation. The Company generated total operating revenues of approximately $597 million, $786 million and $538 million from clients represented on its board of directors during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. In addition, the Company maintains banking relationships and has credit facilities with clients that have representation on the board of directors. See Note 11—Debt.
During fiscal 2008, one of the Company’s directors, and the spouse of another of the Company’s directors, were officers of entities that participated in (or were affiliated with an entity that participated in) the IPO as underwriters, and one of those entities was also a client. As underwriters, each was offered and purchased 113 million shares of class A common stock at a price of $42.77 per share, the same as that paid by all underwriters in the IPO. As underwriters, each also received total underwriter fees of $139 million in March 2008.
Investees. The Company generated total operating revenues of $27 million, $56 million and $39 million, and received dividend income of $2 million, $41 million and $65 million from related party investees during fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company also received special IPO dividends from certain related party investees which are included in the amounts discussed in Note 16—Stockholders’ Equity.
|
|||
Note 21—Income Taxes
The Company’s income before taxes by fiscal year consisted of the following:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
U.S. |
$ | 3,973 | $ | 3,807 | $ | 1,245 | ||||||
|
Non-U.S. |
665 | 193 | 91 | |||||||||
|
Total income before taxes and minority interest |
$ | 4,638 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 1,336 | ||||||
Fiscal 2010 U.S. income before taxes of $4.0 billion includes $1.1 billion from non-U.S. clients.
Income tax expense by fiscal year consisted of the following:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
Current: |
||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal |
$ | 1,089 | $ | 912 | $ | 416 | ||||||
|
State and local |
260 | 226 | 82 | |||||||||
|
Non-U.S. |
76 | 208 | 31 | |||||||||
|
Total current taxes |
1,425 | 1,346 | 529 | |||||||||
|
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal |
209 | 353 | 189 | |||||||||
|
State and local |
35 | 14 | (193 | ) | ||||||||
|
Non-U.S. |
5 | (65 | ) | 7 | ||||||||
|
Total deferred taxes |
249 | 302 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Total income tax expense |
$ | 1,674 | $ | 1,648 | $ | 532 | ||||||
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented below:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
||||||||
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
$ | 115 | $ | 37 | ||||
|
Comprehensive income |
78 | 105 | ||||||
|
Investments in joint ventures |
12 | 19 | ||||||
|
Accrued litigation obligation |
210 | 571 | ||||||
|
Volume and support incentives |
179 | 122 | ||||||
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
83 | — | ||||||
|
Tax credits |
25 | 19 | ||||||
|
Federal benefit of state taxes |
287 | 268 | ||||||
|
Federal benefit of foreign taxes |
7 | 5 | ||||||
|
Other |
57 | 44 | ||||||
|
Deferred tax assets |
1,053 | 1,190 | ||||||
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
||||||||
|
Property, equipment and technology, net |
(186 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||
|
Intangible assets |
(4,396 | ) | (4,131 | ) | ||||
|
Foreign taxes |
(21 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
|
Other |
(8 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
(4,611 | ) | (4,294 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (3,558 | ) | $ | (3,104 | ) | ||
Total net deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Current deferred tax assets |
$ | 623 | $ | 703 | ||||
|
Non current deferred tax liabilities |
(4,181 | ) | (3,807 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (3,558 | ) | $ | (3,104 | ) | ||
The decrease in the deferred tax asset for accrued litigation obligation is primarily due to payment of the Retailers’ litigation settlement in fiscal 2010. The increase in the deferred tax liability for intangibles is primarily related to the acquisition of CyberSource in fiscal 2010.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets recorded.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had $217 million federal and $137 million state net operating loss carryforwards from CyberSource available to reduce future taxable income. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards will expire in fiscal 2013 through 2029. Internal Revenue Code Section 382 imposes substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating losses and tax credits in the event of a corporation’s ownership change, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code. Although the Company’s ability to utilize the net operating loss carryforwards was limited in fiscal 2010, the Company expects to fully utilize the net operating loss carryforwards in future years.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company also had federal and state research and development tax credit carryforwards of $6 million and $21 million, respectively. The federal carryforwards will expire in fiscal 2017 through 2028. The state carryforwards can be carried forward indefinitely. The Company also has federal alternative minimum tax credits of approximately $1 million, which do not expire. The Company expects to realize the benefit of the credit carryforwards in future years.
The income tax expense differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% to pretax income, as a result of the following:
| For the Years Ended September 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dollars | Percent | Dollars | Percent | Dollars | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal income tax at statutory rate |
$ | 1,623 | 35 | % | $ | 1,400 | 35 | % | $ | 467 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
177 | 4 | % | 156 | 4 | % | 43 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
Non-U.S. tax effect, net of federal benefit |
(124 | ) | (2 | )% | 7 | — | 13 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
Reserve for tax uncertainties related to litigation |
2 | — | 4 | — | 103 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
Other, net |
9 | — | 30 | 1 | % | 21 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Remeasurement of deferred taxes due to change in state apportionment |
15 | — | — | — | (115 | ) | (9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
Non-U.S. tax on sale of VisaNet do Brasil, net of federal benefit |
— | — | 51 | 1 | % | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Revaluation of Visa Europe put option |
(28 | ) | (1 | )% | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
Income tax expense |
$ | 1,674 | 36 | % | $ | 1,648 | 41 | % | $ | 532 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||
The difference between the effective income tax rates for fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 is primarily due to changes in the geographic mix of the Company’s global income; the benefit of tax incentives in Singapore, the Company’s largest operating hub outside the U.S.; the nontaxable revaluation of the Visa Europe put option in fiscal 2010; and the additional foreign tax related to the sale of the investment in VisaNet do Brasil in fiscal 2009.
The effective income tax rate for fiscal 2009 differs from that for fiscal 2008 primarily due to the additional non-U.S. tax in fiscal 2009 on the sale of the investment in VisaNet do Brasil, the litigation tax reserves in fiscal 2008, and a rate reduction in fiscal 2008 from the combined effect of the loss of a California special deduction upon IPO and the deferred tax remeasurement benefit from the change in state tax apportionment.
Income taxes receivable of $140 million and $135 million are included in prepaid and other current assets at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See Note 7—Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, income taxes payable of $40 million and $23 million, respectively, are included in accrued income taxes as part of accrued liabilities, and accrued income taxes of $423 million and $304 million, respectively, are included in other long-term liabilities. See Note 10—Accrued and Other Liabilities.
Cumulative undistributed earnings of the Company’s international subsidiaries amounted to $974 million at September 30, 2010, all of which are intended to be reinvested indefinitely outside the U.S. The amount of income taxes that would have resulted had such earnings been repatriated is not practically determinable.
The Company’s largest operating hub outside the U.S. is located in Singapore. It operates under a tax incentive agreement which is effective through September 30, 2014, and may be extended through September 30, 2023, if certain additional requirements are satisfied. The tax incentive agreement is conditional upon certain employment and investment thresholds being met by the Company. The tax incentive agreement decreased Singapore tax by $93 million in fiscal 2010 and $16 million in fiscal 2009. The benefit of the tax incentive agreement on diluted earnings per share was $0.13 in fiscal 2010 and $0.02 in fiscal 2009.
In accordance with ASC 740, the Company is required to inventory, evaluate, and measure all uncertain tax positions taken or to be taken on tax returns, and to record liabilities for the amount of such positions that may not be sustained, or may only partially be sustained, upon examination by the relevant taxing authorities.
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s total gross unrecognized tax benefits were $545 million and $439 million, respectively, exclusive of interest and penalties described below. Included in the $545 million and $439 million are $443 million and $397 million of unrecognized tax benefits, respectively, that if recognized, would reduce the effective tax rate in a future period.
A reconciliation of beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits by fiscal year is as follows:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Beginning balance at October 1 |
$ | 439 | $ | 407 | ||||
|
Increases of unrecognized tax benefits related to prior years |
65 | 14 | ||||||
|
Increases of unrecognized tax benefits related to current year |
44 | 23 | ||||||
|
Decreases of unrecognized tax benefits related to settlements |
— | (4 | ) | |||||
|
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits related to lapsing statute of limitations |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
Ending balance at September 30 |
$ | 545 | $ | 439 | ||||
It is the Company’s policy to account for interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as interest expense and administrative and other, respectively, in its consolidated statements of operations. In fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Company recognized $37 million, $17 million and $2 million of interest expense, respectively, and $5 million, $4 million and a de minimis amount of penalties, respectively, related to uncertain tax positions in its consolidated statements of operations. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had accrued interest of $58 million and $22 million, respectively, and accrued penalties of $10 million and $5 million, respectively, related to uncertain tax positions in its other long-term liabilities.
The Company believes that unrecognized tax benefits may possibly decrease by $50 million within the next 12 months, due to the possible effective settlement on the timing of certain deductions, which would not impact the effective tax rate.
The Company’s fiscal 2006, 2007 and 2008 U.S. federal income tax returns are currently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company is also subject to examinations by various state and foreign tax authorities. The Company has concluded all California income tax matters for years through fiscal 2003. All material state and foreign tax matters have been concluded for years through fiscal 2002.
|
|||
Note 22—Legal Matters
The Company is party to various legal and regulatory proceedings. Some of these proceedings involve complex claims that are subject to substantial uncertainties and unascertainable damages. Accordingly, except as disclosed, the Company has not established reserves or ranges of possible loss related to these proceedings, as at this time in the proceedings, the matters do not relate to a probable loss and/or amounts are not reasonably estimable. Although the Company believes that it has strong defenses for the litigation and regulatory proceedings described below, it could in the future incur judgments or fines or enter into settlements of claims that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows. From time to time, the Company may engage in settlement discussions or mediations with respect to one or more of its outstanding litigation matters, either on its own behalf or collectively with other parties.
The Company recorded litigation provisions of approximately ($45 million), $2 million and $1,470 million in fiscal 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The credit to the provision in fiscal 2010 was primarily the result of a $41 million pre-tax gain recognized related to the prepayment of the remaining obligations under the Retailers’ litigation (discussed in Other Litigation below). The remaining credit balance was due to the release of accruals for certain legal matters settled during fiscal 2010. There was no other significant provision activity to offset the credit balance in fiscal 2010. The litigation accrual is an estimate and is based on management’s understanding of its litigation profile, the specifics of each case, advice of counsel to the extent appropriate and management’s best estimate of incurred loss at the balance sheet date.
The following table summarizes the activity related to accrued litigation for both covered and other non-covered litigation for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Balance at October 1 |
$ | 1,717 | $ | 3,758 | ||||
|
Provision for settled legal matters |
(45 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
Provision for unsettled legal matters |
— | 3 | ||||||
|
Settlement obligation refunded by Morgan Stanley(1) |
— | 65 | ||||||
|
Interest accretion on settled matters |
27 | 93 | ||||||
|
Payments on settled matters(2) |
(1,002 | ) | (2,201 | ) | ||||
|
Balance at September 30 |
$ | 697 | $ | 1,717 | ||||
| (1) |
This balance represents the amount of a settlement refunded to the Company during fiscal 2009 by Morgan Stanley under a separate agreement. |
| (2) |
This amount includes the Company’s October 2009 prepayment of its remaining $800 million in payment obligations in the Retailers’ litigation at a discounted amount of $682 million. |
Covered Litigation
Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A. and Visa International are parties to certain legal proceedings discussed below that are subject to the retrospective responsibility plan, which the Company refers to as the covered litigation. See Note 4—Retrospective Responsibility Plan. An accrual for covered litigation is recorded when loss is deemed to be probable and reasonably estimable. In making this determination the Company evaluates available information, including funding decisions made by the litigation committee. The accrual related to covered litigation could be either higher or lower than the escrow account balance. The Company did not record an additional accrual for covered litigation during fiscal 2010.
The Discover Litigation
On October 4, 2004, Discover Financial Services, Inc. filed a complaint against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard International Incorporated (MasterCard). The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and was designated as a related case to a lawsuit brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in 1998. The complaint alleged, among other things, that the implementation and enforcement of Visa’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s Competitive Programs Policy, or CPP, which prohibited their respective members from issuing American Express or Discover cards violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and California’s Unfair Competition Law, and sought money damages (subject to trebling) and attorneys’ fees and costs.
On October 13, 2008, Visa, MasterCard and Discover reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation. The parties executed a final settlement agreement on October 27, 2008 that became effective on November 4, 2008 upon approval by holders of Visa’s class B common stock. Visa’s net share of the settlement totaled $1.8 billion, of which $1.74 billion was paid over four quarters from the escrow account established by the retrospective responsibility plan. Visa Inc. also paid $80 million toward Visa’s share in connection with releases obtained from MasterCard with respect to certain potential claims. Visa Inc. also paid an additional $65 million, which was refunded by Morgan Stanley, under a separate agreement related to the settlement. Visa’s settlement obligations were fully satisfied with the September 2009 payment to Discover. The Company’s consolidated statement of operations reflects a provision of $1.8 billion for the settlement in fiscal 2008.
The American Express Litigation
On November 15, 2004, American Express filed a complaint against Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard and several Visa U.S.A. and Visa International member financial institutions in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleged that the implementation and enforcement of Visa U.S.A.’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s CPP violated Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, and sought money damages (subject to trebling) and attorneys’ fees and costs.
Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A. and Visa International entered into a settlement agreement with American Express that became effective on November 9, 2007. Under the settlement agreement, American Express will receive maximum payments of $2.25 billion, including up to $2.07 billion from Visa Inc. and $185 million from five co-defendant banks. An initial payment of $1.13 billion was made on March 31, 2008, including $945 million funded through the litigation escrow account established under the retrospective responsibility plan and $185 million from the five co-defendant banks. Beginning April 2008, Visa Inc. will pay American Express an additional amount of up to $70 million each quarter for 16 quarters, for a maximum total of $1.12 billion. The quarterly settlement payments are also covered by the retrospective responsibility plan. The total settlement was recorded in fiscal 2007 at a discounted value of $1.9 billion using a rate of 4.72% over the payment term. The present value of the remaining obligation is reflected in current and long-term accrued litigation obligation on the consolidated balance sheets.
The quarterly payments are in an amount equal to 5% of American Express’s United States global network services billings during the quarter up to a maximum of $70 million per quarter; provided, however, that if the payment for any quarter is less than $70 million, the maximum payment for a future quarter or quarters shall be increased by the difference between $70 million and such lesser amount as was actually paid. American Express has met the performance criteria set forth in the settlement agreement for each quarter thus far, including the fourth fiscal quarter of fiscal 2010, and Visa has made each of the corresponding settlement payments.
The Attridge Litigation
On December 8, 2004, a complaint was filed in California state court on behalf of an alleged class of consumers asserting claims against Visa U.S.A., Visa International and MasterCard under California’s Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Law. The claims in this action, Attridge v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., et al., seek to piggyback on the portion of the DOJ litigation in which the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York found that Visa’s bylaw 2.10(e) and MasterCard’s CPP constitute unlawful restraints of trade under the federal antitrust laws. On May 19, 2006, the court entered an order dismissing plaintiff’s Cartwright Act claims with prejudice but allowing the plaintiff to proceed with his Unfair Competition Law claims, which seek restitution, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs. On December 14, 2007, the plaintiff amended his complaint to add Visa Inc. as a defendant. No new claims were added to the complaint.
On July 1, 2009, the court denied in part the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment or Summary Adjudication, but ordered the parties to submit affidavits as to whether further discovery should be conducted prior to the court rendering judgment on the Motion for Summary Adjudication. On August 3, 2009, the court ruled the Motion submitted without any such further discovery.
In the separate “Indirect Purchaser” Credit/Debit Card Tying Cases, also pending in California state court, Visa entered into a settlement agreement on September 14, 2009. That settlement could potentially have the effect of releasing the claims asserted in the Attridge case, subject to the ruling of the Attridge court. On September 24, 2009, the Attridge court deferred its decision on the Motion for Summary Adjudication pending court approval of the settlement in the Credit/Debit Card Tying Cases. On August 23, 2010, final approval of the Credit/Debit Card Tying Cases settlement was granted. The plaintiff in Attridge and others have appealed the final approval order.
The Interchange Litigation
Kendall. On October 8, 2004, a class action lawsuit was filed by a group of merchants in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Visa U.S.A., MasterCard and several Visa U.S.A. member financial institutions alleging, among other things, that Visa U.S.A.’s and MasterCard’s interchange reimbursement fees violate the Sherman Act and the Clayton Act (Kendall v. Visa U.S.A. Inc., et al.). On July 25, 2005, the court granted Visa U.S.A.’s motion to dismiss and dismissed the complaint with prejudice.
On March 7, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of the complaint. The court concluded that the plaintiffs had failed to plead facts sufficient to establish a conspiracy, and that no amendment could cure the pleading defect. In doing so, the Ninth Circuit also held that the plaintiffs were “indirect purchasers” of Visa U.S.A. and could not recover antitrust damages for their claims. Plaintiffs did not seek review of the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.
Multidistrict Litigation Proceedings (MDL). Beginning in May 2005, approximately 55 complaints, all but 10 of which were styled as class actions, have been filed in U.S. federal district courts on behalf of merchants against Visa U.S.A. and/or MasterCard, and in some cases, certain Visa member financial institutions. Visa International was also named as a defendant in more than 30 of these complaints. The cases allege, among other things, that Visa’s and MasterCard’s purported setting of interchange reimbursement fees, their “no surcharge” rules, and alleged tying and bundling of transaction fees violate federal antitrust laws. On October 19, 2005, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order transferring these cases to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York for coordination of pre-trial proceedings (MDL 1720). On April 24, 2006, the group of purported class plaintiffs filed a First Amended Class Action Complaint. Taken together, the claims in the First Amended Class Action Complaint and in the 10 complaints brought on behalf of individual merchants are generally brought under Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. In addition, some of these complaints contain certain state unfair competition law claims. These interchange-related cases seek money damages (alleged in the consolidated class action complaint to range in the tens of billions of dollars), subject to trebling, as well as attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief.
As part of the retrospective responsibility plan, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International entered into a judgment sharing agreement with certain member financial institutions of Visa U.S.A. on July 1, 2007.
On January 8, 2008, the district court adopted the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the class plaintiffs’ claims for damages incurred prior to January 1, 2004.
On January 29, 2009, class plaintiffs filed a Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Among other things, this complaint: (i) added new claims for damages and injunctive relief against Visa and the bank defendants regarding interchange reimbursement fees for Visa PIN-debit cards; (ii) added new claims for damages and injunctive relief against Visa and the bank defendants since the time of Visa’s IPO regarding interchange reimbursement fees for Visa’s credit, offline debit, and PIN-debit cards; (iii) eliminated claims for damages relating to the so-called “no-surcharge” rule and “anti-steering” rules; (iv) eliminated claims for damages based on the alleged tie of network processing services and payment guarantee services to the payment card system services; and (v) added Visa Inc. as a defendant.
In addition, class plaintiffs filed a Second Supplemental Class Action Complaint (the “Supplemental Complaint”) against Visa Inc. and several financial institutions challenging Visa’s reorganization and IPO under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and Section 7 of the Clayton Act. In the Supplemental Complaint, class plaintiffs seek unspecified monetary damages and declaratory and injunctive relief, including an order that the IPO be unwound.
On May 8, 2008, class plaintiffs served on defendants a motion seeking to certify a class of merchants. On March 31, 2009, Visa, jointly with other defendants, moved to dismiss the Supplemental Complaint and the Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint.
The parties have exchanged expert reports and taken expert discovery. No trial date has been set.
Other Litigation
Retailers’ Litigation. Beginning in October 1996, several antitrust class action lawsuits were brought by U.S. merchants against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard. The suits were later consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation. Among other claims, the plaintiffs alleged that Visa U.S.A.’s “Honor All Cards” rule, which required merchants that accepted Visa cards to accept for payment every validly presented Visa card, and a similar MasterCard rule, constituted an illegal tying arrangement in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. On June 4, 2003, the parties signed a settlement agreement that was approved by the court on December 19, 2003. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Visa agreed to modify its “Honor All Cards” rule such that a merchant may accept only Visa check cards, only Visa credit cards, or both. Visa also agreed to pay approximately $2.0 billion to the merchant class over 10 years in equal annual installments of $200 million per year, among other things.
Subject to court approval, on August 31, 2009, Visa entered into an agreement to prepay its remaining $800 million in settlement payments for $682 million. On October 2, 2009, the court entered a final order approving the prepayment agreement, and Visa made the prepayment pursuant to the agreement’s terms on October 5, 2009. Pursuant to its terms, the prepayment agreement became final after no appeals to the approval order were filed within the 30-day appeal period.
“Indirect Purchaser” Actions. Complaints were also filed in 19 different states and the District of Columbia alleging state antitrust, consumer protection and common law claims against Visa U.S.A. and MasterCard (and, in California, Visa International) on behalf of consumers. The claims in these class actions included allegations mirroring those made in the U.S. merchant lawsuit and asserting that merchants, faced with excessive merchant discount fees, passed on some portion of those fees to consumers in the form of higher prices on goods and services sold. Plaintiffs seek money damages and injunctive relief. Visa U.S.A. has been successful in the majority of these cases, as courts in 17 jurisdictions have granted Visa U.S.A.’s motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim or plaintiffs have voluntarily dismissed their complaints. The court approved the voluntary dismissal of one of the consolidated cases in New Mexico on September 16, 2009. In the remaining New Mexico case, the court granted Visa U.S.A.’s motion to dismiss at a hearing on May 14, 2010, and entered an order and judgment dismissing the case on June 9, 2010. The plaintiff filed a notice of appeal from that order and judgment on June 14, 2010.
In California, in the consolidated Credit/Debit Card Tying Cases, the court dismissed claims brought under the Cartwright Act, but denied a similar motion with respect to Unfair Competition Law claims for unlawful, unfair and/or fraudulent business practices. On October 31, 2007, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to give collateral estoppel effect to certain elements of their “tying” claim based on statements in the ruling on cross-motions for summary judgment in In re Visa Check/MasterMoney Antitrust Litigation. On October 3, 2008, the parties agreed to confidential settlement terms to resolve the dispute. On September 14, 2009, the parties entered into a written settlement agreement that was then submitted to the court for approval. After the parties amended the settlement agreement in certain respects, the court entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement on January 5, 2010 and entered an order granting final approval on August 23, 2010. The plaintiff in Attridge, who had filed objections to the settlement, has filed a notice of appeal from the final approval order, as have other objectors to the settlement. The amount of the settlement is not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
New Zealand Interchange Proceedings. The Commerce Commission, New Zealand’s competition regulator, filed a civil Statement of Claim in the High Court in Wellington on November 9, 2006, alleging that, among other things, the fixing of default interchange rates by Cards NZ Limited, Visa International, MasterCard and certain Visa International member financial institutions contravenes the New Zealand Commerce Act. On November 27, 2006, a group of New Zealand retailers filed a nearly identical claim against the same parties before the same tribunal. Both the Commerce Commission and the retailers seek declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief. Both cases were transferred to the commercial list at the High Court in Auckland in April 2007.
The Commerce Commission, Visa International and Visa Worldwide Pte Ltd settled the Commerce Commission case on August 11, 2009, and the court granted leave to discontinue the claim on August 26, 2009. On October 3, 2009, Visa and the New Zealand retailers entered into an agreement to settle the retailers’ case, and the retailers filed a notice of discontinuance on October 7, 2009. The terms of the settlements are not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
Currency Conversion Litigation. In 2000, a “representative” action was filed in California state court against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International in connection with an asserted 1% currency conversion “fee” assessed on member financial institutions by the payment card networks on transactions involving the purchase of goods or services in a foreign currency and the disclosure of that fee (Schwartz). Plaintiffs claimed Visa’s currency conversion practices violated California Business & Professions Code Section 17200. Additional California state class actions were filed against Visa U.S.A. and Visa International challenging currency conversion practices (Shrieve, Mattingly, and Baker). Visa U.S.A., Visa International, MasterCard, Citicorp Diners Club, Inc. (Diners Club) and several Visa member financial institutions are also defendants in a number of federal class actions that allege, among other things, violations of federal antitrust laws based on the 1% currency conversion fee. The federal complaints were consolidated or coordinated in MDL 1409 (In re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust Litigation) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On July 20, 2006, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International entered into a settlement agreement in MDL 1409. Under the terms of that settlement, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International paid $100.1 million into a settlement fund and agreed that for five years they would separately identify or itemize any fees added to transactions because they occurred in a foreign country or involved a foreign currency and would require U.S. issuing members to disclose certain changes, if any, to exchange rate practices. Visa U.S.A. and Visa International also paid into the settlement fund $18.6 million in attorneys’ fees to resolve Schwartz. The Shrieve, Mattingly, and Baker plaintiffs agreed that they would ask the court to dismiss their actions with prejudice as to Visa U.S.A. and Visa International once the MDL 1409 settlement receives court approval. If Baker is dismissed, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International shall pay $1.0 million plus interest as attorneys’ fees. If Baker is not dismissed within 60 days of final approval of the MDL settlement, Visa U.S.A. and Visa International shall pay $500,000 plus interest as attorneys’ fees.
The court granted final approval of the MDL 1409 settlement on October 22, 2009. Various appeals have been filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit challenging the district court’s approval of the settlement. The issuance of refund checks for valid, timely claims will not commence until after the appeals are resolved (in favor of the court-approved settlement) and the settlement administrator has validated the claims.
Morgan Stanley Dean Witter/Discover Litigation. In August 2004, the European Commission in Brussels issued a Statement of Objections against Visa International and Visa Europe alleging a breach of European competition law. The allegation arises from the Visa International and Visa Europe Rule (bylaw 2.12(b)) that makes certain designated competitors, including Morgan Stanley Dean Witter/Discover, ineligible for membership. On October 3, 2007, the European Commission fined Visa International and Visa Europe €10.2 million ($14.5 million) for infringing European Union rules on restrictive business practices (Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement). Visa International and Visa Europe filed an appeal of the ruling with the Court of First Instance on December 19, 2007. A hearing on Visa International and Visa Europe’s appeal before the General Court (formerly known as the Court of First Instance) was held on May 20, 2010. No ruling has been issued. Pursuant to existing agreements, Visa Europe has acknowledged full responsibility for the defense of this action, including any fines that may be payable.
Merchant Acceptance Rules Investigations. On October 10, 2008, the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) issued a Civil Investigative Demand, or “CID,” to Visa U.S.A. that sought information regarding a potential violation of Section 1 or 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1, 2. The CID sought documents, data and narrative responses to several interrogatories and document requests, which focused on certain merchant acceptance practices, including major payment network rules regarding merchant surcharging and merchants’ ability to steer customers to other forms of payment.
On May 15, 2009, the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Ohio issued an Investigative Demand to Visa Inc. seeking information regarding a potential violation of Chapter 1331 of the Ohio Revised Code, Ohio’s antitrust law. The Ohio Attorney General is part of a multistate attorney general working group. The Investigative Demand sought copies of documents, data and narrative responses that Visa had produced to the Division pursuant to the CID issued on October 10, 2008. The Investigative Demand focused on certain Visa U.S.A. policies relating to merchant acceptance practices, including Visa U.S.A.’s policies regarding merchant surcharging and merchants’ ability to steer customers to other forms of payment.
On October 4, 2010, Visa announced a settlement with the DOJ and the attorneys general of seven states to resolve their investigations. As part of the settlement, Visa will allow U.S. merchants to offer discounts or other incentives to steer customers to a particular form of payment including to a specific network brand or to any card product, such as a “non-reward” Visa credit card. Visa’s rules always have allowed U.S. merchants to steer customers to other forms of payment and offer discounts to customers who choose to pay with cash, check or PIN debit. The new rules will expand U.S. merchants’ ability to discount for their preferred form of payment, though they will not be able to pick and choose amongst issuing banks. The settlement agreement does not address Visa’s rule prohibiting U.S. merchants from surcharging consumers. Apart from a partial reimbursement to the state attorneys general of their attorneys’ fees and expenses, there is no monetary obligation associated with the settlement. The reimbursement amount is not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
The consent decree setting forth the terms of settlement is subject to court approval. Visa will make formal rule changes after the court enters a final judgment following a public comment period, but will refrain from enforcing its current discounting rules in the interim.
Venezuela Interchange Proceedings. On October 2, 2008, the Superintendencia para la Promoción y Protección de la Libre Competencia (“Competition Authority”) of Venezuela filed an administrative proceeding against “Visa Inc. International” (sic), MasterCard, American Express, Diners Club, Consorcio Credicard, and more than thirty privately held financial institutions. The Competition Authority alleges that, among other things, the defendants’ setting of default interchange rates and merchant discount rates violates Venezuelan competition law. The Competition Authority seeks monetary and injunctive relief.
The evidentiary phase of the investigation has concluded, but the Competition Authority has not yet issued any findings as a result of the investigation.
European Interchange Proceedings. On April 3, 2009, the European Commission issued a Statement of Objections (“SO”) to Visa Europe, Visa International and Visa Inc. alleging a breach of European competition law. Visa Inc. and Visa International were served with the Statement of Objections on June 1, 2009. The SO alleges a breach of Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. The SO is directed to Visa Inc. and Visa International as to Honor All Cards, the no-surcharge rule and what the Commission alleges is the “subsidiary application of the Inter-Regional MIFs to the intra-regional POS transactions with consumer cards.” On August 10, 2009, Visa Inc. and Visa International filed a response to the SO. On April 26, 2010, Visa Europe announced an agreement with the European Commission, subject to public consultation, to end the proceedings initiated by the Statement of Objections issued April 3, 2009, with respect to Visa Europe’s immediate debit interchange fees. Pursuant to existing agreements among the parties, Visa Europe is obligated to indemnify Visa International and Visa Inc. in connection with this proceeding, including payment of any fines that may be imposed.
Canadian Competition Bureau Proceedings. On April 21, 2009, Visa received an oral notification from the Canadian Competition Bureau that it has initiated a civil inquiry regarding interchange and certain of Visa policies relating to merchant acceptance practices. On August 4, 2010, the Bureau issued a voluntary draft information request to Visa seeking information on certain merchant acceptance practices, interchange (including the setting of default interchange), and fees paid by issuers and acquirers to Visa. Visa is cooperating with the Bureau with respect to the information request.
Brazilian Competition Authority Proceedings. On August 7, 2009, Secretaria de Direito Econômico (SDE), the Brazilian competition agency, opened an administrative proceeding against Visa International, Visa do Brasil, and Companhia Brasileira de Meios de Pagamento (f/k/a VisaNet do Brasil) regarding an alleged exclusive relationship between the Company and VisaNet do Brasil, the then sole acquirer of Visa transactions in Brazil. SDE also issued an injunction against Visa International and Visa do Brasil requiring, among other things, that Visa grant additional acquiring licenses to Brazilian financial institutions and suspend Visa’s exclusive relationship with VisaNet do Brasil. The SDE administrative proceeding followed the issuance of a report by the Central Bank of Brazil suggesting, among other things, that the single-acquirer structure in Brazil be changed.
Visa International and Visa do Brasil appealed the injunction to Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE), the Brazilian competition authority, and on September 16, 2009, CADE revoked the injunction in its entirety. On December 16, 2009, Visa International and Visa do Brasil reached an agreement with CADE for the immediate suspension of the investigation and its eventual closure without fines if certain conditions were met. On August 3, 2010, CADE formally closed the investigation against Visa International and Visa do Brasil without the imposition of any fines, concluding that both entities had fully complied with the terms of their agreement with CADE.
The Reserve Primary Fund. On May 5, 2009, Visa U.S.A. commenced an action in the United States Court for the Southern District of New York against The Reserve Primary Fund, or the Fund, and related entities in connection with the Fund’s failure to promptly redeem in full Visa U.S.A.’s investment in a money market mutual fund. On September 15, 2008, Visa U.S.A. sought to redeem its entire investment of over $981 million, plus accrued dividends. The Fund failed to return Visa U.S.A.’s investment within one business day as required by the Fund’s prospectus. Pursuant to a liquidation plan, the Fund made interim distributions, returning approximately 90% of Visa U.S.A.’s investment. Visa U.S.A. sought damages in excess of $98 million, the amount of its investment then held by the Fund. Also see Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements and Note 7—Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets. On May 5, 2009, the SEC commenced an action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against the Fund and proposed an alternative plan of liquidation.
On November 25, 2009, the court accepted most aspects of the SEC plan and ordered that the remaining assets in the Fund, with the exception of a reserve for ongoing expenses and claims, be returned to investors on a pro-rata basis. In January and July 2010, Visa U.S.A. received further distributions from the Fund. Together with interim distributions, Visa U.S.A. has received a total payout of 99% of Visa U.S.A.’s original investment, and any further recovery will also likely be pursuant to the SEC plan. Visa U.S.A. voluntarily dismissed its case without prejudice on March 31, 2010.
CyberSource securities litigation. On April 29, 2010, an individual named Carol Ann Peters filed a class action lawsuit against CyberSource Corporation (“CyberSource”), certain of its directors, and Visa Inc. in California Superior Court in connection with the proposed merger of CyberSource and Visa. The complaint asserts claims of breach of fiduciary duty against the CyberSource directors and aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty against CyberSource and Visa. Plaintiff later added Market Street Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Visa Inc., as a defendant and seeks declaratory and injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees. A similar lawsuit was filed on May 4, 2010, by the Inter-Local Pension Fund of the Graphic Communications Conference of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters in the Chancery Court of the State of Delaware. The Delaware complaint was voluntarily dismissed and re-filed in California Superior Court on June 1, 2010, adding allegations of inadequate disclosure in CyberSource’s preliminary proxy statement concerning the merger. On June 9, 2010, the California court consolidated the two suits, now captioned In re CyberSource Shareholder Litigation.
On June 29, 2010, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation. The agreement requires CyberSource to make certain additional disclosures related to the proposed merger, which were made in CyberSource’s definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on June 11, 2010, but does not require any defendant to pay money damages. A notice of the settlement, which was subject to confirmatory discovery and court approval, was filed on July 13, 2010. On September 16, 2010, following completion of confirmatory discovery, the parties filed formal settlement documents with the court. On November 10, 2010, the court entered an order preliminarily approving the settlement and directing that notice of the settlement be provided to potential class members. A final approval hearing is scheduled for January 14, 2011. The settlement is not considered material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Dynamic Currency Conversion. Visa has received notices from competition regulators in New Zealand, Australia, and Korea regarding investigations into Visa’s policies relating to the provision of Dynamic Currency Conversion (DCC) services. DCC refers to the conversion of the purchase price of goods or services from one currency to another at the point of sale, as agreed to by the cardholder and merchant. Visa is cooperating with these regulators with respect to these investigations.
Data pass litigation. On August 27, 2010, a consumer filed a class action complaint against Webloyalty.com, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., and Visa Inc. in federal district court in Connecticut. The plaintiff claims, among other things, that consumers who made online purchases at Amazon.com were deceived into also incurring charges for services from Webloyalty.com through the alleged unauthorized passing of cardholder account information during the sales transaction (“data pass”), in violation of federal and state consumer protection statutes and common law. Visa allegedly aided and abetted the conduct of the other defendants. Plaintiff seeks damages, restitution, and injunctive relief. The plaintiff voluntarily dismissed Amazon.com as a defendant without prejudice on October 29, 2010. Webloyalty.com and Visa each filed motions to dismiss the case on November 1, 2010. Webloyalty.com also has asked the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation to consolidate with this case, for pretrial proceedings, a case pending in federal district court in California in which Webloyalty.com and Movietickets.com (but not Visa) are named as defendants.
Gift Card Litigation
Visa is a party to various lawsuits involving prepaid gift cards. Pursuant to existing agreements, Visa may be indemnified by the issuer of the gift card in question for liability associated with some or all of the claims asserted in these suits.
Loiseau/Barclay. On November 24, 2009, Loiseau filed his third amended complaint. Both Visa and Metabank moved to dismiss that complaint. The court granted Visa’s motion and dismissed the complaint with prejudice on February 10, 2010.
On December 1, 2009, represented by the same counsel as Mr. Loiseau, William Barclay filed a class action against Visa U.S.A. and Metabank making similar allegations as in the Loiseau case. On December 31, 2009, Metabank removed the Barclay action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California and filed a notice of relatedness between the two cases. Both Visa and Metabank moved to dismiss the Barclay complaint. Ultimately, Barclay agreed to dismiss Visa from the case and on February 25, 2010, Visa was dismissed from the case with prejudice.
Matalas. On May 27, 2010, Diane Matalas filed a class action lawsuit against Wells Fargo Bank and Visa Inc. in California Superior Court asserting claims under California’s gift card act and other consumer laws. Among other things, Matalas alleges that certain authorization practices for gift cards are unlawful. On July 14, 2010, Wells Fargo Bank removed the case to U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Both Visa and Metabank moved to dismiss the complaint. On September 27, 2010, all of the parties stipulated that Visa be dismissed from the case without prejudice. The plaintiff has moved to amend her complaint, dropping Visa as a defendant.
Intellectual Property Litigation
Vale Canjeable
On November 21, 2006, Vale Canjeable Ticketven, C.A. filed an action in the Fifth Municipal Court of Caracas (“Fifth Municipal court”), Venezuela against Todoticket 2004, C.A., and Visa International seeking a preliminary injunction preventing use of the Visa Vale mark in Venezuela. In December 2006, the plaintiff also filed a claim with the Fourth Commercial Court of First Instance of Caracas (“First Instance court”), alleging that the defendants infringed the plaintiff’s rights as the holder of the trademark registries and requesting declarative, injunctive and monetary relief.
On November 29, 2006, the Fifth Municipal court granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting use of the “Vale” in the Venezuelan market of food vouchers. On December 6, 2006, Visa International filed a constitutional objection to that ruling. The objection was dismissed, and Visa International appealed the decision through the appellate courts.
On September 25, 2007, Visa International’s request for removal of the First Instance judge from the case was granted. A new judge was assigned to finalize the discovery phase of the case.
After all appeals to the lower appellate courts had been rejected, on March 14, 2008, Visa International filed an extraordinary appeal of the preliminary injunction ruling with the Commercial Chamber of the Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”). On August 6, 2008, the Supreme Court accepted Visa International’s appeal and declared the lower court’s decision null and void. Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s order, on March 25, 2009, the First Commercial Judge of Appeals of Caracas issued a new decision. The decision (i) dismissed Visa International’s appeal; (ii) ratified the preliminary injunction; and (iii) found Visa and Todoticket liable for legal fees and costs in connection with the appeal. On July 9, 2009, Visa International filed a further appeal, and on December 10, 2009, the Supreme Court again decided in Visa’s favor, overturning the appellate ruling. The Supreme Court ordered a new Judge of Appeals to consider the preliminary injunction that prevented Visa from using the Visa Vale trademark in Venezuela. No decision has yet been issued by the new Judge of Appeals.
On February 11, 2010, in a separate action on the merits, the First Instance court dismissed in its entirety the plaintiff’s claim against Visa International and other defendants for damages based on trademark infringement. The plaintiff is appealing the decision.
Every Penny Counts, Inc.—Prepaid Cards
On July 17, 2007, Every Penny Counts, Inc. filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida against Visa U.S.A., MasterCard and American Express for patent infringement. Plaintiff amended its complaint on September 27, 2007 to add Green Dot Corp. as a party and to add a patent to its suit. The complaint now alleges that the defendants’ “open” prepaid card products infringe five U.S. Patents held by the plaintiff. After the court denied Visa U.S.A.’s motion to dismiss, on November 13, 2007, Visa U.S.A. filed its answer and counterclaims alleging that Visa does not infringe the plaintiff’s patents, that the plaintiff’s patents are invalid, and that the plaintiff’s patents are unenforceable due to prosecution laches and inequitable conduct.
At a claims construction hearing on May 22, 2008, the court ruled in favor of defendants on all five of plaintiff’s patents. In light of this ruling, plaintiff orally agreed to a stipulated judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims. The court entered judgment for all defendants on May 23, 2008, which was affirmed by the Federal Circuit on April 30, 2009. The Federal Circuit denied Every Penny Counts’s petition for rehearing on May 26, 2009 and issued its mandate on June 2, 2009. Judgment was entered pursuant to that mandate on June 10, 2009. The U.S. Supreme Court denied Every Penny Counts’s petition for writ of certiorari on November 9, 2009.
TQP Development, LLC—Data Encryption
On March 25, 2009, TQP Development, LLC filed a lawsuit against Visa Inc., Visa U.S.A., Visa International and a number of other companies, including American Express, MasterCard and Barclays, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that methods practiced on the defendants’ websites infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,412,730 (“Encrypted Data Transmission System Employing Means for Randomly Altering the Encryption Keys”). On May 22, 2009, Visa answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that Visa is not infringing the patent and/or that the patent is invalid. On December 21, 2009, the parties executed an agreement to settle the litigation, and the case was dismissed with prejudice on January 4, 2010. The settlement amount is not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
Actus, LLC—Prepaid Cards
On April 9, 2009, Actus, LLC filed a lawsuit against Visa Inc. and a number of other companies in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that certain Visa prepaid products infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,328,189 (“Method and Apparatus for Conducting Electronic Commerce Transactions Using Electronic Tokens”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,249,099 (“Method and Apparatus for Conducting Electronic Commerce Transactions Using Electronic Tokens”). On June 11, 2009, Visa filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims. Actus filed a second amended complaint on August 17, 2009, to address the issues raised in Visa’s motion, and Visa and other defendants filed a renewed motion to dismiss on September 8, 2009. On April 21, 2010, the parties executed an agreement to settle the litigation, and on April 30, 2010, the court dismissed the claims against Visa with prejudice. The settlement amount is not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
Joao Bock Transaction Systems—Transaction Security
On May 11, 2009, Joao Bock Transaction Systems of Texas, LLC filed a lawsuit against Visa Inc. and a number of other companies in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging that certain Visa products and/or services infringe U.S. Patent No. 7,096,003 (“Transaction Security Apparatus”). On June 23, 2009, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. On July 10, 2009, Visa filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claim. On October 1, 2009, the parties executed an agreement to settle the litigation, and the case was dismissed with prejudice on October 13, 2009. The settlement amount is not considered material to the consolidated financial statements.
Restricted Spending Solutions, LLC—Prepaid and Commercial Cards
On June 23, 2009, Restricted Spending Solutions, LLC filed a lawsuit against Visa U.S.A. and a number of other companies in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging that certain Visa prepaid and commercial cards infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,044,360 (“Third Party Credit Card”). Plaintiff seeks money damages and injunctive relief. On October 30, 2009, Visa U.S.A. answered the complaint and filed a counterclaim for a declaratory judgment that Visa is not infringing the patent and/or that the patent is invalid.
On November 19, 2009, Visa U.S.A. filed its First Amended Answer and Counterclaim to the plaintiff’s complaint. On February 5, 2010, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment of invalidity based on Visa’s U.S. Patent 5,500,513. The court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on September 29, 2010. Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit on October 28, 2010.
|
|||
Note 23—Subsequent Events
In October 2010, the Company’s board of directors authorized a $1.0 billion share repurchase plan. The authorization will be in place through September 30, 2011, subject to extension or expansion at the determination of the Company’s board of directors. See Note 16—Stockholders’ Equity.
On October 8, 2010, the Company funded the litigation escrow account with $800 million. See Note 4—Retrospective Responsibility Plan.
On October 20, 2010, the Company’s board of directors declared a dividend in the aggregate amount of $0.15 per share of class A common stock (determined in the case of class B and class C common stock on an as-converted basis). See Note 16—Stockholders’ Equity.
|
|||
Organization. Visa Inc. (“Visa” or the “Company”) is a global payments technology company that connects consumers, businesses, banks and governments around the world, enabling them to use digital currency instead of cash and checks. Visa and its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries, including Visa U.S.A. Inc. (“Visa U.S.A.”), Visa International Service Association (“Visa International”), Visa Worldwide Pte. Limited (“VWPL”), Visa Canada Corporation (“Visa Canada”), Inovant LLC (“Inovant”) and CyberSource Corporation (“CyberSource”), operate the world’s largest retail electronic payments network. The Company provides financial institutions with payment processing platforms that encompass consumer credit, debit, prepaid and commercial payments, and facilitates global commerce through the transfer of value and information among financial institutions, merchants, consumers, businesses and government entities. The Company does not issue cards, set fees, or determine the interest rates consumers will be charged on Visa-branded cards, which are the independent responsibility of the Company’s issuing clients. In order to respond to industry dynamics and enhance Visa’s ability to compete, Visa undertook a reorganization in October 2007, and in March 2008 the Company completed its initial public offering, or the IPO. See Note 2—The Reorganization. In July 2010, the Company completed its acquisition of CyberSource in order to expand the Company’s online payment, fraud, and security management capabilities and to accelerate its growth in eCommerce. The results of CyberSource are included in the Company’s results from the acquisition date. See Note 6—CyberSource Acquisition.
Consolidation and basis of presentation. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Visa Inc. and its consolidated entities and are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The Company consolidates all entities that are controlled by ownership of a majority voting interest as well as variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Non-controlling interests are reported as a component of equity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications, not affecting net income, have been made to prior period information to conform to the current period presentation format, including reclassification of $85 million and $115 million of contractor expense, which was previously reported in professional and consulting fees, to personnel for fiscal years 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The Company has one reportable segment, “Payment Services”. The Company’s activities are interrelated and each activity is dependent upon and supportive of the other. Accordingly, all significant operating decisions are based on analysis of Visa Inc. as a single global business.
Use of estimates. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Future actual results could materially differ from these estimates. The use of estimates in specific accounting policies is described further below as appropriate.
Cash and cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents include cash and certain highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less from the date of purchase. Cash equivalents are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value.
Restricted cash—litigation escrow. The Company deposited funds from the IPO and its own funds into an escrow account from which settlements of, or judgments in, the covered litigation will be paid. See Note 4—Retrospective Responsibility Plan for discussion of covered litigation. The escrow funds are held in money market investments together with the income earned, less applicable taxes payable, and classified as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheet. The amount of the escrow account, equivalent to the actual undiscounted amount of payments expected to be made beyond one year from the balance sheet date for settled claims, is classified as a non-current asset. Interest earned on escrow funds is included in investment income, net, on the consolidated statement of operations.
Investments and fair value. The Company measures certain required assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value measurements are reported under a three-level valuation hierarchy. The classification of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The fair value of the Company’s cash equivalents (money market funds), mutual fund equity securities and exchange-traded equity securities are based on quoted prices and are therefore classified as Level 1.
Level 2—Inputs to the valuation methodology can include: (1) quoted prices in active markets for similar (not identical) assets or liabilities; (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets in non-active markets; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.
Level 2 assets include U.S. government-sponsored debt securities for which fair value is based on quoted prices in active markets for similar assets, and other observable inputs. Foreign exchange derivative instruments in an asset or liability position are also classified in Level 2 and are valued using inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data.
Level 3—Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and cannot be corroborated by observable market data. Inputs reflect the use of significant management judgment via the use of pricing models for which the assumptions include estimates of market participant assumptions. Level 3 assets include the Company’s auction rate securities, corporate debt securities, mortgage backed securities and other asset backed securities. Level 3 liabilities include the Visa Europe put option. See Note 3—Visa Europe.
Effective fiscal 2010, the Company adopted guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) that allows companies to use net asset value per share as a fair value measurement without further adjustment as a practical expedient. The adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements. Additional disclosures required are not presented because the related investments are not material to the overall consolidated financial statements.
Furthermore, the Company adopted FASB guidance to disclose significant transfers into and out of Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The guidance also clarified existing disclosure requirements for the disaggregation of assets and liabilities presented and discussion of inputs and valuation techniques. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements.
Available-for-sale securities include investments in debt and marketable equity securities. These securities are recorded at cost at the time of purchase and are carried at fair value. The Company classifies its debt and marketable equity securities as available-for-sale to meet its operational needs. Investments with original maturities greater than 90 days and stated maturities less than one year from the balance sheet date are current assets, while those with stated maturities greater than one year from the balance sheet date are non-current assets. Unrealized gains and losses are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gain or loss. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned and are included in investment income, net on the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company evaluates its debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment, or OTTI, on an ongoing basis. OTTI is assessed when fair value is below amortized cost. OTTI can be triggered when a company has the intent to sell a security, is more likely than not required to sell the security before recovery of the amortized cost basis, or does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. The Company has not presented required separate disclosures because its gross unrealized loss positions in debt securities for the periods presented are not material. In addition, the credit and non-credit loss components of debt securities on the balance sheet for which OTTI was previously recognized were not material. The Company had no OTTI for available-for-sale debt securities during fiscal 2010. The Company recognized OTTI of $9 million during fiscal 2009 primarily related to corporate debt, mortgage backed and asset backed securities, and $9 million during fiscal 2008 primarily related to auction rate securities.
Trading assets include mutual fund equity security investments related to various employee compensation and benefit plans. The trading activity of these investments is dependent upon the actions of the Company’s employees. Interest and dividend income and changes in fair value are recorded in investment income, net, and offset in personnel expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company uses the equity method of accounting for investments in other entities when it holds between 20% and 50% ownership in the entity or when it exercises significant influence. Under the equity method, the Company’s share of each entity’s profit or loss is reflected in equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on the consolidated statements of operations. The equity method of accounting is also used for flow-through entities such as limited partnerships and limited liability companies when the investment ownership percentage is equal to or greater than 5% of outstanding ownership interests, regardless of whether the Company has significant influence over the investees.
The Company accounts for investments in other entities under the historical cost method of accounting when it holds less than 20% ownership in the entity or for flow-through entities when the investment ownership is less than 5%, and the Company does not exercise significant influence. These investments consist of equity holdings in non-public companies and are recorded in other assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company regularly reviews investments accounted for under the cost and equity methods for possible impairment, which generally involves an analysis of the facts and changes in circumstances influencing the investment, expectations of the entity’s cash flows and capital needs, and the viability of its business model.
Financial instruments. The Company considers the following to be financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash-litigation escrow, trading and available-for sale investments, the Reserve Primary Fund (see Note 7—Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets), accounts receivable, non-marketable equity investments, customer collateral, accounts payable, debt, settlement guarantees, derivative instruments, the Visa Europe put option, and settlement receivable and payable. The estimated fair value of such instruments at September 30, 2010 approximates their carrying value as reported on the consolidated balance sheets except as otherwise disclosed, or as deemed impracticable to estimate the fair value, such as for non-marketable equity investments. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements.
Settlement receivable and payable. The Company operates systems for clearing and settling customer payment transactions. Net settlements are generally cleared within one to two business days, resulting in amounts due to and from clients. These settlement receivables and payables are stated at cost and are presented gross on the consolidated balance sheets.
Customer collateral. The Company holds cash deposits and other non-cash assets from certain clients in order to ensure their performance of settlement obligations arising from credit, debit and travelers cheque product clearings. The cash collateral assets are restricted and fully offset by corresponding liabilities and both balances are presented on the consolidated balance sheets. Non-cash collateral assets are held on behalf of the Company by a third party and are not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. See Note 13—Settlement Guarantee Management.
Property, equipment and technology, net. Property, equipment and technology, net are recorded at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization, which are computed on a straight-line basis over the asset’s estimated useful life. Depreciation and amortization of technology, furniture, fixtures and equipment are computed over estimated useful lives ranging from 2 to 7 years. Capital leases are amortized over the lease term and leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or lease term. Building improvements are depreciated between 3 and 40 years, and buildings are depreciated over 40 years. Improvements that increase functionality of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over the asset’s remaining useful life. Land and construction-in-progress are not depreciated. Fully depreciated assets are retained in property, equipment and technology, net, until removed from service.
Technology includes purchased and internally developed software, including technology assets acquired in the July 2010 CyberSource acquisition. Internally developed software represents software primarily used by the VisaNet electronic payment network. Internal and external costs incurred during the preliminary project stage are expensed as incurred. Qualifying costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized. Once the project is substantially complete and ready for its intended use these costs are amortized on a straight-line basis over the technology’s estimated useful life.
The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. If the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of an asset or asset group, an impairment loss is recognized. The loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset or asset group exceeds its fair value.
Leases. The Company enters into operating and capital leases for the use of premises, software and equipment. Rent expense related to lease agreements which contain lease incentives is recorded on a straight-line basis.
Intangible assets, net. The Company records identifiable intangible assets at fair value on the date of acquisition and evaluates the useful life of each asset. Finite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis and are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized but are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of tradename, customer relationships and Visa Europe franchise right acquired in the October 2007 reorganization. The Company tests each category of indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an aggregate basis, which may require the allocation of cash flows and/or an estimate of fair value to those assets or asset group. Impairment exists if the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is less than the carrying value. The Company relies on a number of factors when completing impairment assessments, including a review of discounted future cash flows, business plans and use of present value techniques. The Company evaluated its indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment as of July 1, 2010 and concluded there was no impairment as of that date.
Finite-lived intangible assets include those acquired in the July 2010 CyberSource acquisition, and consist of customer relationships, tradenames and reseller relationships. These intangibles have useful lives ranging from 5 years to 15 years. Since the acquisition of CyberSource, no events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment exists. See Note 6—CyberSource Acquisition and Note 9—Intangible Assets, Net.
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but is evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level annually as of July 1st, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may exist. Impairment is reviewed using a two-step process. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment exists, and the second step is not performed. If the fair value is less than the carrying value, the second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. The Company relies on a number of factors when completing impairment assessments including a review of discounted future cash flows, business plans and use of present value techniques.
The Company evaluated its goodwill for impairment on July 1, 2010 and concluded there was no impairment as of that date. Subsequent to this annual assessment, the Company completed the CyberSource acquisition on July 21, 2010, which resulted in additional goodwill. The Company allocates goodwill to reporting units based on the reporting unit expected to benefit from the acquisition. No recent events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment exists as reflected by the Company’s overall business performance and market capitalization.
Volume and support incentives. The Company enters into incentive agreements with clients, merchants, and other business partners designed to build payments volume and to increase product acceptance. These incentives are generally accounted for as reductions of operating revenues, or expenses where an identifiable benefit can be established. The Company generally capitalizes certain incentive payments under these agreements if certain criteria are met. The capitalization criteria include the existence of future benefits to Visa, the existence of legally enforceable recoverability clauses, such as early termination clauses, management’s ability and intent to enforce the recoverability clauses and the ability to generate future earnings from the agreement in excess of the deferred amounts. Incentives are accrued systematically and rationally based on management’s estimate of the clients’ performance. These accruals are regularly reviewed and estimates of performance are adjusted as appropriate. Capitalized amounts are amortized over the period of contractual recoverability.
Accrued litigation. The Company evaluates the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome in legal or regulatory proceedings to which it is a party and records a loss contingency when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. These judgments are subjective, based on the status of such legal or regulatory proceedings, the merits of the Company’s defenses and consultation with corporate and external legal counsel. Actual outcomes of these legal and regulatory proceedings may materially differ from the Company’s estimates. Litigation accruals associated with settled obligations to be paid over periods longer than one year are initially recorded using the present value of future payment obligations. The obligation is accreted to its full payment value with the corresponding accretion charge included in interest expense on the consolidated statement of operations. The Company expenses legal costs as incurred in professional and consulting fees. See also Note 22—Legal Matters.
Revenue recognition. The Company’s operating revenues are comprised principally of service revenues, data processing revenues, international transaction revenues and other revenues, reduced by costs incurred under volume and support incentives. The Company recognizes revenue when the price is fixed or determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.
Service revenues predominantly represent payments by clients with respect to their card programs carrying marks of the Visa brand and are based principally upon spending on Visa-branded cards for goods and services. Current quarter service revenues are primarily assessed using a calculation of pricing applied to the prior quarter’s payments volume. The Company also earns revenues from assessments designed to support ongoing acceptance and volume growth initiatives. These revenues are recognized in the same period the related volume is transacted.
Data processing revenues represent revenues earned for authorization, clearing, settlement, transaction processing services and other maintenance and support services that facilitate transaction and information processing among the Company’s clients globally and Visa Europe. These revenues are recognized in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered. Data processing revenues also include revenues earned for transactions processed by CyberSource’s online payment gateway.
International transaction revenues are assessed to clients on cardholder transactions where the cardholder’s issuer country is different from the merchant’s country. Revenues from these cross-border transactions are recognized in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.
Other revenues primarily include revenues earned from Visa Europe in connection with the Visa Europe Framework Agreement (see Note 3—Visa Europe), and fees from cardholder services and licensing and certification. Other revenues also include optional service or product enhancements, such as extended cardholder protection and concierge services. Other revenues are recognized in the same period the related transactions occur or services are rendered.
Advertising, marketing and promotion. The Company expenses costs for the production of advertising as incurred. The cost of media advertising is expensed when the advertising takes place. Sponsorship costs are recognized over the period in which the Company benefits from the sponsorship rights. Promotional items are expensed as incurred, when the related services are received, or when the related event occurs.
Income taxes. The Company’s income tax expense consists of two components: current and deferred. Current income tax expense represents taxes to be paid for the current period. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the respective tax basis of existing assets and liabilities, and operating loss and credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. In assessing whether deferred tax assets are realizable, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. A valuation allowance is recorded for the portions that are not expected to be realized based on the level of historical taxable income, projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary differences are deductible, and allowable tax planning strategies.
Where interpretation of the tax law may be uncertain, the Company recognizes, measures and discloses income tax uncertainties. The Company accounts for interest expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company files a consolidated federal income tax return and, in certain states, combined state tax returns. Foreign taxes paid are generally deducted to reduce federal income taxes payable.
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans. The Company’s defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are actuarially evaluated, incorporating various critical assumptions including the discount rate and the expected rate of return on plan assets (for qualified pension plans). The discount rate is based on matching the duration of a pool of high quality corporate bonds to the expected benefit payment stream, and is used to determine the present value of the Company’s future benefit obligations. The expected rate of return on pension plan assets considers the current and expected asset allocation, as well as historical and expected returns on each plan asset class. Any difference between actual and expected plan experience, including asset return experience, in excess of a 10% corridor is recognized in net periodic pension cost over the expected average employee future service period, approximately 8 years for United States plans. Other assumptions involve demographic factors such as retirement, mortality, attrition and the rate of compensation increases. The Company evaluates assumptions annually and modifies them as appropriate.
The Company recognizes the funded status of its benefit plans in its consolidated balance sheet as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within equity. The Company immediately recognizes settlement losses when it settles pension benefit obligations, including making lump-sum cash payments to plan participants in exchange for their rights to receive specified pension benefits, when certain thresholds are met. The Company began including annual disclosures about the fair value of its pension plan assets in fiscal 2010, as required. See Note 12—Pension, Postretirement and Other Benefits.
Foreign currency remeasurement and translation. The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar for the majority of its foreign operations. Transactions denominated in currencies other than the applicable functional currency are converted to the functional currency at the exchange rate on the transaction date. At period end, monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured to the functional currency using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are remeasured at historical exchange rates. Gains and losses related to conversion and remeasurement are recorded in administrative and other in the consolidated statements of operations.
The functional currency for Visa Canada is the Canadian dollar. Translation from the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar is performed for balance sheet accounts using exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date and for revenue and expense accounts using an average exchange rate for the period. Resulting translation adjustments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets.
Derivative financial instruments. The Company uses forward foreign exchange contracts to reduce its exposure to foreign currency rate changes on non-functional currency denominated forecasted operating revenues and expenses. Derivatives are carried at fair value on the consolidated balance sheets. Gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value of derivative instruments are accounted for either in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the consolidated balance sheets, or in the consolidated statements of operations (in the corresponding account where revenue or expense is hedged, or to administrative and other for hedge amounts determined to be ineffective) depending on whether they are designated and qualify for hedge accounting. Fair value represents the difference in the value of the contracts at the contractual rate and the value at current market rates, and generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay to terminate the contracts at the reporting date based on broker quotes for the same or similar instruments.
Additional disclosures that demonstrate how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows have not been presented because the impact of derivative instruments is immaterial to the overall consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations and statements of comprehensive income. See Note 14—Derivative Financial Instruments.
Guarantees and indemnifications. The Company recognizes an obligation for guarantees and indemnifications at inception if the fair value is estimable, regardless of the probability of occurrence. The Company indemnifies issuing and acquiring clients from settlement losses suffered by the failure of any other customer to honor drafts, travelers cheques, or other instruments processed in accordance with Visa’s operating regulations. The estimated fair value of the liability for settlement indemnification is included in accrued liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and is described in Note 13—Settlement Guarantee Management. The Company also indemnifies Visa Europe for any claims brought against Visa Europe arising out of the provision of services by Visa Inc.’s customer financial institutions, as described in Note 3—Visa Europe.
Share-based compensation. The Company recognizes share-based compensation cost using the fair value method of accounting. The Company recognizes compensation cost for awards with only service conditions on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period. Compensation cost for performance and market condition based awards is initially estimated based on target performance and is adjusted as appropriate based on management’s best estimate throughout the performance period. See Note 18—Share-based Compensation.
Earnings per share. The Company calculates earnings per share using the two-class method to reflect the different rights of each class and series of outstanding common stock. The dilutive effect of incremental common stock equivalents is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. See Note 17—Earnings Per Share. Beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, the Company included unvested instruments granted in share-based payment transactions that have non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents in the calculation of earnings per share as a separate class of security. This change did not result in any impact to fiscal 2009 and 2008 full year diluted class A net income per share.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 810-10, “Consolidation”, which changes how a company determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The determination of whether a company is required to consolidate an entity is based on, among other things, an entity’s purpose and design and a company’s ability to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. The Company will adopt ASC 810-10 effective October 1, 2010. Early adoption is prohibited. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. The Company will adopt ASU 2009-13 effective October 1, 2010. The adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, which requires additional information in the roll-forward of Level 3 assets and liabilities, including the presentation of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. This ASU impacts disclosures only. The Company will adopt this guidance in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements.
|
|||
Subsequent to the initial funding, the Company made additional deposits of operating cash into the escrow account, which had the effect of the Company repurchasing its common stock as follows:
| Fiscal 2011 | Fiscal 2010 | Fiscal 2009 | ||||||||||||||
| October 2010(1) |
May 2010 |
July 2009 |
December 2008 |
|||||||||||||
| (in millions except per share data and conversion rate) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Funding under the plan |
$ | 800 | $ | 500 | $ | 700 | $ | 1,100 | ||||||||
|
Repurchase price per share(2) |
$ | 72.74 | $ | 74.22 | $ | 60.45 | $ | 52.88 | ||||||||
|
Equivalent shares of class A common stock repurchased |
11 | 7 | 12 | 21 | ||||||||||||
|
Conversion rate after funding of class B common stock to class A common stock |
0.5102 | 0.5550 | 0.5824 | 0.6296 | ||||||||||||
|
As-converted class B common stock after funding |
125 | 136 | 143 | 155 | ||||||||||||
| (1) |
On September 21, 2010, the Company announced it will deposit $800 million into the litigation escrow account. The funds were deposited into the escrow account on October 8, 2010. |
| (2) |
Price per share calculated using the volume-weighted average price of the Company’s class A common stock over a pricing period in accordance with the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation. |
The following table sets forth the changes in the escrow account:
| Fiscal 2010 | Fiscal 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Balance at October 1 |
$ | 1,715 | $ | 1,928 | ||||
|
Funding under the plan |
500 | 1,800 | ||||||
|
American Express settlement payments |
(280 | ) | (280 | ) | ||||
|
Discover settlement payments(1) |
— | (1,748 | ) | |||||
|
Interest earned, less applicable taxes |
1 | 15 | ||||||
|
Balance at September 30 |
$ | 1,936 | $ | 1,715 | ||||
|
Less: Current portion of escrow account |
(1,866 | ) | (1,365 | ) | ||||
|
Long-term portion of escrow account |
$ | 70 | $ | 350 | ||||
| (1) |
The Company made payments totaling $1.9 billion related to the Discover settlement during fiscal 2009. Of the $1.9 billion payment, $1.7 billion was funded through the escrow account under the plan and $145 million, $65 million of which was reimbursed by Morgan Stanley evenly over the four fiscal 2009 quarters, was funded from the Company’s operating cash. |
|
|||
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis.
| Fair Value Measurements at September 30 Using Inputs Considered as |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents and restricted cash |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Money market funds and time deposits |
$ | 5,448 | $ | 5,977 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Investment securities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency debt securities |
$ | 135 | $ | 169 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Canadian government debt securities |
— | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Equity securities |
60 | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Corporate debt securities |
$ | — | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mortgage backed securities |
— | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other asset backed securities |
— | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Auction rate securities |
13 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Derivative financial instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange derivative instruments |
5 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| $ | 5,508 | $ | 6,050 | $ | 140 | $ | 192 | $ | 13 | $ | 34 | |||||||||||||
|
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Other liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Visa Europe put option |
$ | 267 | $ | 346 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Foreign exchange derivative instruments |
$ | 56 | $ | 96 | ||||||||||||||||||||
The amortized cost, unrealized gains and losses, and fair value of available-for-sale securities are as follows:
| Available-For-Sale (in millions) |
||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency debt securities |
$ | 130 | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | 135 | ||||||||
|
Auction rate securities |
13 | — | — | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 143 | $ | 5 | $ | — | $ | 148 | ||||||||
|
Less: current portion of available-for-sale securities |
(124 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities |
$ | 24 | ||||||||||||||
| Available-For-Sale (in millions) |
||||||||||||||||
| Amortized Cost |
Gross Unrealized | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||
| Gains | Losses | |||||||||||||||
|
September 30, 2009: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. government-sponsored agency debt securities |
$ | 160 | $ | 9 | $ | — | $ | 169 | ||||||||
|
Canadian government debt securities |
7 | — | — | 7 | ||||||||||||
|
Corporate debt securities |
10 | — | — | 10 | ||||||||||||
|
Mortgage backed securities |
6 | — | — | 6 | ||||||||||||
|
Other asset backed securities |
5 | — | — | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
Auction rate securities |
13 | — | — | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
Equity Securities |
7 | 7 | — | 14 | ||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 208 | $ | 16 | $ | — | $ | 224 | ||||||||
|
Less: current portion of available-for-sale securities |
(56 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
Long-term available-for-sale securities |
$ | 168 | ||||||||||||||
Contractual maturities may differ from expected maturities as borrowers may have the right to prepay certain obligations in advance of the contractual due date.
| Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
September 30, 2010: |
||||||||
|
Due within one year |
$ | 120 | $ | 124 | ||||
|
Due after 1 year through 5 years |
10 | 11 | ||||||
|
Due after 5 years through 10 years |
— | — | ||||||
|
Due after 10 years |
13 | 13 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 143 | $ | 148 | ||||
Investment income, net, consisted of the following:
| For the Years Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
Interest and dividend income on cash and investments |
$ | 26 | $ | 113 | $ | 279 | ||||||
|
Gain on other investments |
20 | 473 | — | |||||||||
|
Investment securities-available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
|
Gross realized gains |
2 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||
|
Gross realized losses |
— | — | (3 | ) | ||||||||
|
Investment securities-trading assets: |
||||||||||||
|
Unrealized gains |
3 | 8 | — | |||||||||
|
Realized gains (losses) |
1 | (6 | ) | — | ||||||||
|
Other-than-temporary impairment on investments and other assets |
(3 | ) | (16 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||
|
Investment income, net |
$ | 49 | $ | 575 | $ | 211 | ||||||
|
|||
Total purchase consideration was approximately $2.0 billion, paid with cash on hand as follows:
| (in millions) | ||||
|
Acquisition of approximately 72 million shares of outstanding common stock of CyberSource at $26.00 per share |
$ | 1,866 | ||
|
Fair value of earned stock options settled |
86 | |||
|
Total purchase price |
$ | 1,952 | ||
The following table summarizes the purchase price allocation, which is preliminary pending finalization of the valuation analysis.
| (in millions) | ||||
|
Tangible assets and liabilities |
||||
|
Current assets |
$ | 259 | ||
|
Non-current assets |
150 | |||
|
Current liabilities |
(45 | ) | ||
|
Non-current liabilities |
(256 | ) | ||
|
Intangible assets |
605 | |||
|
Goodwill |
1,239 | |||
|
Net assets acquired |
$ | 1,952 | ||
The following table summarizes the fair value of the acquired intangible assets. See Note 9—Intangible Assets, Net.
| Fair Value | Weighted-Average Useful Life |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Customer relationships |
$ | 320 | 10 | |||||
|
Reseller relationships |
95 | 9 | ||||||
|
Tradenames |
190 | 15 | ||||||
|
Total amortizable intangible assets |
$ | 605 | 12 | |||||
|
|||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Prepaid expenses and maintenance |
$ | 72 | $ | 97 | ||||
|
Income tax receivable—(See Note 21—Income Taxes) |
140 | 135 | ||||||
|
Money market investment—Reserve Primary Fund |
— | 69 | ||||||
|
Other |
30 | 65 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 242 | $ | 366 | ||||
Other non-current assets consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Other investments—(See Note 5—Investments and Fair Value Measurements) |
$ | 114 | $ | 102 | ||||
|
Pension asset—(See Note 12—Pension, Postretirement and Other Benefits) |
53 | — | ||||||
|
Long-term prepaid expenses and other |
30 | 23 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 197 | $ | 125 | ||||
|
|||
Property, equipment and technology, net consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Land |
$ | 71 | $ | 71 | ||||
|
Buildings and building improvements |
648 | 629 | ||||||
|
Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements |
687 | 598 | ||||||
|
Construction-in-progress |
75 | 43 | ||||||
|
Technology |
908 | 688 | ||||||
|
Total property, equipment and technology |
2,389 | 2,029 | ||||||
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(1,032 | ) | (825 | ) | ||||
|
Property, equipment and technology, net |
$ | 1,357 | $ | 1,204 | ||||
At September 30, 2010, estimated future amortization expense on technology placed in service was as follows:
|
Fiscal (in millions) |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Estimated future amortization expense |
$ | 76 | $ | 67 | $ | 62 | $ | 49 | $ | 77 | $ | 331 | ||||||||||||
|
|||
The fair value of these intangible assets and related accumulated amortization expense was as follows:
| Finite-lived Intangible Assets September 30, 2010 |
||||||||||||
| Gross | Accumulated Amortization |
Net | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
Finite-lived intangible assets |
||||||||||||
|
Customer relationships |
$ | 320 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 314 | |||||
|
Reseller relationships |
95 | (2 | ) | 93 | ||||||||
|
Tradenames |
190 | (2 | ) | 188 | ||||||||
|
Total finite-lived intangible assets |
$ | 605 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 595 | |||||
|
Indefinite-lived intangible assets |
10,883 | |||||||||||
|
Total intangible assets, net |
$ | 11,478 | ||||||||||
At September 30, 2010, estimated future amortization expense on finite-lived intangible assets is as follows:
|
Fiscal (in millions) |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 and thereafter |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Estimated future amortization expense |
$ | 59 | $ | 59 | $ | 59 | $ | 59 | $ | 359 | $ | 595 | ||||||||||||
|
|||
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Visa Europe put option(1)—(See Note 3—Visa Europe) |
$ | 267 | $ | 346 | ||||
|
Accrued operating expenses |
100 | 87 | ||||||
|
Accrued marketing and product expenses |
58 | 103 | ||||||
|
Deferred revenue |
42 | 39 | ||||||
|
Accrued income taxes—(See Note 21—Income Taxes) |
40 | 23 | ||||||
|
Other |
118 | 156 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 625 | $ | 754 | ||||
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Accrued income taxes—(See Note 21—Income Taxes) |
$ | 423 | $ | 304 | ||||
|
Employee benefits |
76 | 119 | ||||||
|
Other |
118 | 49 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 617 | $ | 472 | ||||
| (1) |
The put option is exercisable at any time at the sole discretion of Visa Europe with payment required 285 days thereafter. Classification in current liabilities is not an indication of management’s expectation of exercise and simply reflects the fact that the obligation resulting from the exercise of the instrument could become payable within 12 months. |
|
|||
The Company had outstanding debt as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
5.60% Senior secured notes—Series B, principal and interest payments payable quarterly, due December 2012 |
$ | 15 | $ | 22 | ||||
|
8.28% Secured notes—Series B, principal and interest payments payable monthly, due September 2014 |
13 | 16 | ||||||
|
7.83% Secured notes—Series B, principal and interest payments payable monthly, due September 2015 |
17 | 19 | ||||||
|
Total principal amount of debt |
$ | 45 | $ | 57 | ||||
|
Unamortized discount, debt issuance costs and other costs |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
Total debt |
$ | 44 | $ | 56 | ||||
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
(12 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
|
Long-term debt |
$ | 32 | $ | 44 | ||||
Future principal payments on the Company’s outstanding debt are as follows:
|
Fiscal |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
|
(in millions) |
$ | 12 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 5 | $ | 45 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|||
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation/Accumulated Postretirement Benefit Obligation:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation-beginning of fiscal year |
$ | 739 | $ | 667 | $ | 43 | $ | 50 | ||||||||
|
Service cost |
45 | 51 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost |
40 | 46 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
Plan amendments |
(12 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
3 | 64 | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
|
Settlements |
— | 4 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Benefit payments |
(72 | ) | (93 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
|
Benefit obligation-end of fiscal year |
$ | 743 | $ | 739 | $ | 34 | $ | 43 | ||||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation |
$ | 743 | $ | 720 | NA | NA | ||||||||||
|
Change in Plan Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets-beginning of fiscal year |
$ | 703 | $ | 624 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Actual return on plan assets |
73 | 6 | — | — | ||||||||||||
|
Company contribution |
62 | 166 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
Benefit payments |
(72 | ) | (93 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
|
Fair value of plan assets-end of fiscal year |
$ | 766 | $ | 703 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Funded status at end of fiscal year |
$ | 23 | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | |||||
|
Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
||||||||||||||||
|
Noncurrent asset |
$ | 53 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
|
Current liability |
(10 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||
|
Noncurrent liability |
(20 | ) | (32 | ) | (30 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||
|
Funded status at end of fiscal year |
$ | 23 | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | |||||
Amounts recognized in accumulated comprehensive income before tax:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
| September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Net actuarial loss (gain) |
$ | 240 | $ | 276 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | ||||||
|
Prior service credit |
(51 | ) | (48 | ) | (20 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 189 | $ | 228 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | ||||||
Amounts from accumulated other comprehensive income to be amortized into net periodic benefit cost in fiscal 2011:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
$ | 19 | $ | (1 | ) | |||
|
Prior service credit |
(9 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
|
Total |
$ | 10 | $ | (4 | ) | |||
Benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets with obligations in excess of plan assets:
| Pension Benefits | ||||||||
| September 30, | ||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets |
||||||||
|
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year |
$ | 30 | $ | 21 | ||||
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year |
— | — | ||||||
|
Projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets |
||||||||
|
Benefit obligation, end of year |
$ | 30 | $ | 739 | ||||
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year |
— | 703 | ||||||
Net periodic pension and other postretirement plan cost:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fiscal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Service cost |
$ | 45 | $ | 51 | $ | 50 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
Interest cost |
40 | 46 | 40 | 1 | 2 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Expected return on assets |
(50 | ) | (45 | ) | (42 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prior service credit |
(9 | ) | (8 | ) | (13 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
16 | 14 | 7 | (1 | ) | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Net benefit cost |
42 | 58 | 42 | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | 7 | ||||||||||||||||
|
Curtailment gain |
— | — | — | — | — | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
Settlement loss |
— | 3 | 27 | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Total net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 42 | $ | 61 | $ | 69 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 5 | ||||||||||
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:
| Pension Benefits | Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Current year actuarial (gain)loss |
$ | (20 | ) | $ | 107 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | |||||
|
Amortization of actuarial (loss)gain |
(16 | ) | (17 | ) | 1 | — | ||||||||||
|
Current year prior service (credit)cost |
(12 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||
|
Amortization of prior service credit |
9 | 8 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
Total recognized in other comprehensive income |
$ | (39 | ) | $ | 98 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | |||||
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income |
$ | 3 | $ | 159 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | ||||||
Weighted Average Actuarial Assumptions:
| Fiscal | ||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
|
Discount rate for benefit obligation(1) |
||||||||||||
|
Pension |
5.25 | % | 5.60 | % | 6.75 | % | ||||||
|
Postretirement |
3.45 | % | 4.43 | % | 6.24 | % | ||||||
|
Discount rate for net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||||||
|
Pension |
5.63 | % | 6.75 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||
|
Postretirement |
4.43 | % | 6.24 | % | 5.99 | % | ||||||
|
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets(2) |
7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | ||||||
|
Rate of increase in compensation levels for: |
||||||||||||
|
Benefit obligation |
4.50 | % | 5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | ||||||
|
Net periodic benefit cost(3) |
5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | 5.50 | % | ||||||
| (1) |
Based on a “bond duration matching” methodology, which reflects the matching of projected plan liability cash flows to an average of high-quality corporate bond yield curves whose duration matches the projected cash flows. |
| (2) |
Primarily based on the targeted allocation, and evaluated for reasonableness by considering such factors as: (i) actual return on plan assets; (ii) historical rates of return on various asset classes in the portfolio; (iii) projections of returns on various asset classes; and (iv) current and prospective capital market conditions and economic forecasts. |
| (3) |
For the net periodic benefit cost for fiscal 2010, rate of increase in compensation is 0% for fiscal 2010 and 5.5% for fiscal 2011 and thereafter. |
The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the plan’s investments at fair value as of September 30, 2010, reflecting unsettled transactions:
| Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents |
$ | 46 | $ | 1 | $ | 47 | ||||||||||
|
Collective investment funds |
307 | 307 | ||||||||||||||
|
Corporate debt securities |
99 | 99 | ||||||||||||||
|
Debt securities of U.S. Treasury and federal agencies |
111 | 111 | ||||||||||||||
|
Asset backed securities |
$ | 26 | 26 | |||||||||||||
|
Equity securities |
190 | 190 | ||||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 236 | $ | 518 | $ | 26 | $ | 780 | ||||||||
There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 assets during fiscal 2010. The following table provides a roll-forward of Level 3 investments in fiscal 2010:
| Asset backed securities | ||||
| (in millions) | ||||
|
Balance at October 1, 2009 |
$ | 28 | ||
|
Actual return on plan assets: |
||||
|
Assets held at reporting date |
2 | |||
|
Assets sold during the period |
— | |||
|
Transfers in or / and (out) of Level 3 |
— | |||
|
Purchases, sales and settlements—net |
(4 | ) | ||
|
Balance at September 30, 2010 |
$ | 26 | ||
Cash Flows
| Pension Benefits |
Other Postretirement Benefits |
|||||||
|
Actual employer contributions |
(in millions) | |||||||
|
2010 |
$ | 62 | $ | 4 | ||||
|
2009 |
166 | 4 | ||||||
|
Expected employer contributions |
||||||||
|
2011 |
$ | 55 | $ | 4 | ||||
|
Expected benefit payments |
||||||||
|
2011 |
$ | 102 | $ | 4 | ||||
|
2012 |
95 | 4 | ||||||
|
2013 |
90 | 4 | ||||||
|
2014 |
90 | 4 | ||||||
|
2015 |
82 | 4 | ||||||
|
2016-2020 |
361 | 16 | ||||||
|
|||
The Company maintained collateral as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Cash equivalents |
$ | 899 | $ | 812 | ||||
|
Pledged securities at market value |
470 | 243 | ||||||
|
Letters of credit |
869 | 703 | ||||||
|
Guarantees |
1,803 | 2,644 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 4,041 | $ | 4,402 | ||||
|
|||
The Company’s long-lived net property, equipment and technology assets are classified by major geographic area as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
U.S. |
$ | 1,301 | $ | 1,128 | ||||
|
Non-U.S. |
56 | 76 | ||||||
|
Total |
$ | 1,357 | $ | 1,204 | ||||
|
|||
After giving effect to the October 2010 escrow funding and the corresponding reduction in the conversion rate applicable to class B common stock outstanding, the number of shares of each class and the number of shares of class A common stock outstanding, on an as-converted basis, are as follows:
|
(in millions
except |
Shares Outstanding at September 30, 2010 |
Conversion Rate Into Class A Common Stock |
Class A Common Stock As Converted at September 30, 2010(1) |
After giving effect to the October 2010 escrow account funding |
||||||||||||||||
| Conversion Rate Into Class A Common Stock |
Class A Common Stock As Converted(1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
Class A common stock |
493 | — | 493 | — | 493 | |||||||||||||||
|
Class B common stock |
245 | 0.5550 | 136 | 0.5102 | 125 | |||||||||||||||
|
Class C common stock |
97 | 1.0000 | 97 | 1.0000 | 97 | |||||||||||||||
| 727 | 716 | |||||||||||||||||||
| (1) |
Figures may not sum due to rounding. As-converted class A common stock count calculated based on whole numbers. |
|
|||
Future minimum payments on leases and marketing and sponsorship agreements per fiscal year, at September 30, 2010 are as follows:
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Operating leases |
$ | 57 | $ | 36 | $ | 28 | $ | 14 | $ | 10 | $ | 12 | $ | 157 | ||||||||||||||
|
Capital leases |
13 | 13 | 13 | — | — | — | 39 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Marketing and sponsorships |
110 | 106 | 96 | 100 | 68 | 105 | 585 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Total |
$ | 180 | $ | 155 | $ | 137 | $ | 114 | $ | 78 | $ | 117 | $ | 781 | ||||||||||||||
The table below sets forth the expected future reduction of revenue for volume and support incentive agreements in effect at September 30, 2010:
| (in millions) | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Volume and support incentives |
$ | 1,575 | $ | 1,515 | $ | 1,318 | $ | 895 | $ | 539 | $ | 458 | $ | 6,300 | ||||||||||||||
|
|||
The Company’s income before taxes by fiscal year consisted of the following:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
U.S. |
$ | 3,973 | $ | 3,807 | $ | 1,245 | ||||||
|
Non-U.S. |
665 | 193 | 91 | |||||||||
|
Total income before taxes and minority interest |
$ | 4,638 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 1,336 | ||||||
Income tax expense by fiscal year consisted of the following:
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||
|
Current: |
||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal |
$ | 1,089 | $ | 912 | $ | 416 | ||||||
|
State and local |
260 | 226 | 82 | |||||||||
|
Non-U.S. |
76 | 208 | 31 | |||||||||
|
Total current taxes |
1,425 | 1,346 | 529 | |||||||||
|
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal |
209 | 353 | 189 | |||||||||
|
State and local |
35 | 14 | (193 | ) | ||||||||
|
Non-U.S. |
5 | (65 | ) | 7 | ||||||||
|
Total deferred taxes |
249 | 302 | 3 | |||||||||
|
Total income tax expense |
$ | 1,674 | $ | 1,648 | $ | 532 | ||||||
The tax effect of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities at September 30, 2010 and 2009 are presented below:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
||||||||
|
Accrued compensation and benefits |
$ | 115 | $ | 37 | ||||
|
Comprehensive income |
78 | 105 | ||||||
|
Investments in joint ventures |
12 | 19 | ||||||
|
Accrued litigation obligation |
210 | 571 | ||||||
|
Volume and support incentives |
179 | 122 | ||||||
|
Net operating loss carryforward |
83 | — | ||||||
|
Tax credits |
25 | 19 | ||||||
|
Federal benefit of state taxes |
287 | 268 | ||||||
|
Federal benefit of foreign taxes |
7 | 5 | ||||||
|
Other |
57 | 44 | ||||||
|
Deferred tax assets |
1,053 | 1,190 | ||||||
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
||||||||
|
Property, equipment and technology, net |
(186 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||
|
Intangible assets |
(4,396 | ) | (4,131 | ) | ||||
|
Foreign taxes |
(21 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
|
Other |
(8 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
(4,611 | ) | (4,294 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (3,558 | ) | $ | (3,104 | ) | ||
Total net deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as follows:
| September 30, 2010 |
September 30, 2009 |
|||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Current deferred tax assets |
$ | 623 | $ | 703 | ||||
|
Non current deferred tax liabilities |
(4,181 | ) | (3,807 | ) | ||||
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (3,558 | ) | $ | (3,104 | ) | ||
The income tax expense differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the applicable U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% to pretax income, as a result of the following:
| For the Years Ended September 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dollars | Percent | Dollars | Percent | Dollars | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
U.S. federal income tax at statutory rate |
$ | 1,623 | 35 | % | $ | 1,400 | 35 | % | $ | 467 | 35 | % | ||||||||||||
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit |
177 | 4 | % | 156 | 4 | % | 43 | 3 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
Non-U.S. tax effect, net of federal benefit |
(124 | ) | (2 | )% | 7 | — | 13 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||
|
Reserve for tax uncertainties related to litigation |
2 | — | 4 | — | 103 | 8 | % | |||||||||||||||||
|
Other, net |
9 | — | 30 | 1 | % | 21 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
Remeasurement of deferred taxes due to change in state apportionment |
15 | — | — | — | (115 | ) | (9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
|
Non-U.S. tax on sale of VisaNet do Brasil, net of federal benefit |
— | — | 51 | 1 | % | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
Revaluation of Visa Europe put option |
(28 | ) | (1 | )% | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||
|
Income tax expense |
$ | 1,674 | 36 | % | $ | 1,648 | 41 | % | $ | 532 | 40 | % | ||||||||||||
A reconciliation of beginning and ending unrecognized tax benefits by fiscal year is as follows:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Beginning balance at October 1 |
$ | 439 | $ | 407 | ||||
|
Increases of unrecognized tax benefits related to prior years |
65 | 14 | ||||||
|
Increases of unrecognized tax benefits related to current year |
44 | 23 | ||||||
|
Decreases of unrecognized tax benefits related to settlements |
— | (4 | ) | |||||
|
Reductions to unrecognized tax benefits related to lapsing statute of limitations |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
Ending balance at September 30 |
$ | 545 | $ | 439 | ||||
|
|||
The following table summarizes the activity related to accrued litigation for both covered and other non-covered litigation for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009:
| 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
| (in millions) | ||||||||
|
Balance at October 1 |
$ | 1,717 | $ | 3,758 | ||||
|
Provision for settled legal matters |
(45 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
Provision for unsettled legal matters |
— | 3 | ||||||
|
Settlement obligation refunded by Morgan Stanley(1) |
— | 65 | ||||||
|
Interest accretion on settled matters |
27 | 93 | ||||||
|
Payments on settled matters(2) |
(1,002 | ) | (2,201 | ) | ||||
|
Balance at September 30 |
$ | 697 | $ | 1,717 | ||||
| (1) |
This balance represents the amount of a settlement refunded to the Company during fiscal 2009 by Morgan Stanley under a separate agreement. |
| (2) |
This amount includes the Company’s October 2009 prepayment of its remaining $800 million in payment obligations in the Retailers’ litigation at a discounted amount of $682 million. |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|