|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Basis of Presentation and General Information
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The reporting and functional currency of the Company is the United States Dollar.
Danaos Corporation (“Danaos”), formerly Danaos Holdings Limited, was formed on December 7, 1998 under the laws of Liberia and is presently the sole owner of all outstanding shares of the companies listed below. Danaos Holdings Limited was redomiciled in the Marshall Islands on October 7, 2005. In connection with the redomiciliation, the Company changed its name to Danaos Corporation. On October 14, 2005, the Company filed and the Marshall Islands accepted Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. The authorized capital stock of Danaos Corporation is 750,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01. Refer to Note 12, Stockholders’ Equity.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) of Danaos and subsidiaries contain all adjustments necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the Company’s consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2013, the consolidated results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 and the consolidated cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. All such adjustments are deemed to be of a normal, recurring nature. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Danaos’ Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Company’s principal business is the acquisition and operation of vessels. Danaos conducts its operations through the vessel owning companies whose principal activity is the ownership and operation of containerships that are under the exclusive management of a related party of the Company.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) represent the consolidation of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. The subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Company. They are de-consolidated from the date that control ceases. Inter-company transaction balances and unrealized gains on transactions between the companies are eliminated.
The Company also consolidates entities that are determined to be variable interest entities as defined in the authoritative guidance under U.S. GAAP. A variable interest entity is defined as a legal entity where either (a) equity interest holders as a group lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest, including decision making ability and an interest in the entity’s residual risks and rewards, or (b) the equity holders have not provided sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (c) the voting rights of some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights to receive the expected residual returns of the entity, or both and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately few voting rights.
The condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) have been prepared to reflect the consolidation of the companies listed below. The historical balance sheets and results of operations of the companies listed below have been reflected in the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income, cash flows and stockholders’ equity at and for each period since their respective incorporation dates.
The consolidated companies are referred to as “Danaos,” or “the Company.”
As of June 30, 2013, Danaos included the vessel owning companies (the “Danaos Subsidiaries”) listed below. All vessels are container vessels:
Company |
|
Date of Incorporation |
|
Vessel Name |
|
Year |
|
TEU |
|
Seacaravel Shipping Ltd. |
|
June 11, 1996 |
|
Hope |
|
1989 |
|
3,908 |
|
Appleton Navigation S.A. |
|
May 12, 1998 |
|
Komodo |
|
1991 |
|
2,917 |
|
Geoffrey Shipholding Ltd. |
|
September 22, 1997 |
|
Kalamata |
|
1991 |
|
2,917 |
|
Victory Shipholding Inc. |
|
October 9, 2002 |
|
Lotus |
|
1988 |
|
3,098 |
|
Duke Marine Inc. |
|
April 14, 2003 |
|
Hyundai Duke |
|
1992 |
|
4,651 |
|
Commodore Marine Inc. |
|
April 14, 2003 |
|
Commodore |
|
1992 |
|
4,651 |
|
Containers Services Inc. |
|
May 30, 2002 |
|
Deva |
|
2004 |
|
4,253 |
|
Containers Lines Inc. |
|
May 30, 2002 |
|
Derby D |
|
2004 |
|
4,253 |
|
Oceanew Shipping Ltd. |
|
January 14, 2002 |
|
CSCL Europe |
|
2004 |
|
8,468 |
|
Oceanprize Navigation Ltd. |
|
January 21, 2003 |
|
CSCL America |
|
2004 |
|
8,468 |
|
Federal Marine Inc. |
|
February 14, 2006 |
|
Hyundai Federal |
|
1994 |
|
4,651 |
|
Karlita Shipping Co. Ltd. |
|
February 27, 2003 |
|
CSCL Pusan |
|
2006 |
|
9,580 |
|
Ramona Marine Co. Ltd. |
|
February 27, 2003 |
|
CSCL Le Havre |
|
2006 |
|
9,580 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 6) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
Marathonas |
|
1991 |
|
4,814 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 7) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
Messologi |
|
1991 |
|
4,814 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 8) Corp. |
|
November 16, 2006 |
|
Mytilini |
|
1991 |
|
4,814 |
|
Auckland Marine Inc. |
|
January 27, 2005 |
|
SNL Colombo |
|
2004 |
|
4,300 |
|
Seacarriers Services Inc. |
|
June 28, 2005 |
|
YM Seattle |
|
2007 |
|
4,253 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Vladivostok |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Advance |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Stride |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Future |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Sprinter |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Wellington Marine Inc. |
|
January 27, 2005 |
|
YM Singapore |
|
2004 |
|
4,300 |
|
Seacarriers Lines Inc. |
|
June 28, 2005 |
|
YM Vancouver |
|
2007 |
|
4,253 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 7) Corp. |
|
December 6, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Highway |
|
1998 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 6) Corp. |
|
December 6, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Progress |
|
1998 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 8) Corp. |
|
December 6, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Bridge |
|
1998 |
|
2,200 |
|
Trindade Maritime Company |
|
April 10, 2013 |
|
Amalia C |
|
1998 |
|
2,452 |
|
Vilos Navigation Company Ltd. |
|
May 30, 2013 |
|
Niledutch Zebra |
|
2001 |
|
2,602 |
|
Bayview Shipping Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Rio Grande |
|
2008 |
|
4,253 |
|
Channelview Marine Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Sao Paolo |
|
2008 |
|
4,253 |
|
Balticsea Marine Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Kingston |
|
2008 |
|
4,253 |
|
Continent Marine Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Monaco |
|
2009 |
|
4,253 |
|
Medsea Marine Inc. |
|
May 8, 2006 |
|
Zim Dalian |
|
2009 |
|
4,253 |
|
Blacksea Marine Inc. |
|
May 8, 2006 |
|
Zim Luanda |
|
2009 |
|
4,253 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Moliere(1) |
|
2009 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Musset(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Nerval(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Rabelais(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Racine(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Expresscarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
March 5, 2007 |
|
YM Mandate |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Expresscarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
March 5, 2007 |
|
YM Maturity |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
CellContainer (No. 1) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Buenos Aires |
|
2010 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 2) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Santos |
|
2010 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 3) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Versailles |
|
2010 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 4) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Algeciras |
|
2011 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 5) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Constantza |
|
2011 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 6) Corp. |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Germany |
|
2011 |
|
10,100 |
|
CellContainer (No. 7) Corp. |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Italy |
|
2011 |
|
10,100 |
|
CellContainer (No. 8) Corp. |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Greece |
|
2011 |
|
10,100 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Attila |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Tancredi |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Bianca |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Samson |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
September 17, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Melisande |
|
2012 |
|
8,530 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Together |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Tenacity |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Smart |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Speed |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Ambition |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
(1) Vessel subject to charterer’s option to purchase vessel after first eight years of time charter term for $78.0 million.
|
2 Significant Accounting Policies
All accounting policies are as described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 1, 2013.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance for reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendment requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods presented, including interim periods. The amended guidance was effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of the new guidance did not have an effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
3 Restricted Cash
Restricted cash is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Retention account |
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
$ |
2,821 |
|
Restricted deposits |
|
16,026 |
|
430 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
18,841 |
|
$ |
3,251 |
|
The Company was required to maintain cash of $2.8 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, in a retention bank account as collateral for the upcoming scheduled debt payments of its KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities, which were recorded under current assets in the Company’s Balance Sheets.
On March 27, 2013, the Company has entered into an agreement with the lenders under the HSH Nordbank AG-Aegean Baltic Bank-Piraeus Bank credit facility. The agreement provides the Company the option to sell, for cash, up to 9 mortgaged vessels (the Henry, the Pride, the Independence, the Honour, the Elbe, the Hope, the Lotus, the Kalamata and the Komodo) with the sale proceeds less sale commissions from such vessels’ sales to be deposited in a restricted cash account and used to finance the acquisition of new containership vessels no later than December 31, 2013. Any funds remaining in this restricted cash account after that date will be applied towards prepayment of the respective credit facility. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had concluded the sales of the Henry, the Pride, the Independence, the Honour and the Elbe and has acquired a 2,452 TEU containership, the Amalia C, built in 1998 for a contract price of $6.6 million and a 2,602 TEU containership, the Niledutch Zebra, built in 2001 for a contract price of $10.1 million. As of June 30, 2013, an amount of $15.6 million was recorded as non-current restricted cash with respect to this agreement.
Furthermore, the Company recorded non-current restricted cash of $0.4 million as cash collateral for one of its outstanding swaps as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.
|
4 Fixed assets, net
Fixed assets consist of vessels. Vessels’ cost, accumulated depreciation and changes thereto were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Vessel |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Book |
| |||
As of January 1, 2012 |
|
$ |
3,703,781 |
|
$ |
(461,830 |
) |
$ |
3,241,951 |
|
Additions |
|
1,022,560 |
|
(143,938 |
) |
878,622 |
| |||
Disposal |
|
(20,606 |
) |
15,801 |
|
(4,805 |
) | |||
Impairment loss |
|
(129,630 |
) |
— |
|
(129,630 |
) | |||
As of December 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
4,576,105 |
|
$ |
(589,967 |
) |
$ |
3,986,138 |
|
Additions |
|
17,757 |
|
(68,147 |
) |
(50,390 |
) | |||
Disposal |
|
(92,123 |
) |
62,806 |
|
(29,317 |
) | |||
As of June 30, 2013 |
|
$ |
4,501,739 |
|
$ |
(595,308 |
) |
$ |
3,906,431 |
|
i. On February 13, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Independence. The gross sale consideration was $7.0 million. The Independence was 26 years old.
ii. On February 28, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Henry. The gross sale consideration was $6.1 million. The Henry was 27 years old.
iii. On March 25, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Pride. The gross sale consideration was $6.5 million. The Pride was 25 years old.
iv. On May 14, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Honour. The gross sale consideration was $9.1 million. The Honour was 24 years old.
iv. On May 14, 2013, the Company acquired a 2,452 TEU containership, the Amalia C, built in 1998 for a contract price of $6.6 million.
v. On June 13, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Elbe. The gross sale consideration was $5.6 million. The Elbe was 22 years old.
vi. On June 25, 2013, the Company acquired a 2,602 TEU containership, the Niledutch Zebra, built in 2001 for a contract price of $10.1 million.
As of December 31, 2012, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $129.6 million in relation to thirteen of its older vessels (including vessels sold in 2013), which were laid up or on short-term charters in the spot market. Fair value of each vessel was determined with the assistance from valuations obtained by third party independent shipbrokers. There was no impairment loss recognized for the three or six months ended June 30, 2013.
The residual value (estimated scrap value at the end of the vessels’ useful lives) of the fleet was estimated at $415.1 million as of June 30, 2013 and $431.9 million as of December 31, 2012. The Company has calculated the residual value of the vessels taking into consideration the 10 year average and the 5 year average of the scrap. The Company has applied uniformly the scrap value of $300 per ton for all vessels. The Company believes that $300 per ton is a reasonable estimate of future scrap prices, taking into consideration the cyclicality of the nature of future demand for scrap steel. Although the Company believes that the assumptions used to determine the scrap rate are reasonable and appropriate, such assumptions are highly subjective, in part, because of the cyclical nature of future demand for scrap steel.
|
5 Deferred Charges, net
Deferred charges, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Drydocking and |
|
Finance |
|
Total |
| |||
As of January 1, 2012 |
|
$ |
6,431 |
|
$ |
93,280 |
|
$ |
99,711 |
|
Additions |
|
9,308 |
|
186 |
|
9,494 |
| |||
Amortization |
|
(6,070 |
) |
(14,314 |
) |
(20,384 |
) | |||
As of December 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
9,669 |
|
$ |
79,152 |
|
$ |
88,821 |
|
Additions |
|
422 |
|
43 |
|
465 |
| |||
Written off amounts |
|
(402 |
) |
— |
|
(402 |
) | |||
Amortization |
|
(3,179 |
) |
(7,754 |
) |
(10,933 |
) | |||
As of June 30, 2013 |
|
$ |
6,510 |
|
$ |
71,441 |
|
$ |
77,951 |
|
The Company follows the deferral method of accounting for drydocking and special survey costs in accordance with accounting for planned major maintenance activities, whereby actual costs incurred are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period until the next scheduled survey, which is two and a half years. If special survey or drydocking is performed prior to the scheduled date, the remaining unamortized balances are immediately written off. Furthermore, when a vessel is drydocked for more than one reporting period, the respective costs are identified and recorded in the period in which they were incurred and not at the conclusion of the drydocking.
|
6 Other Non-current Assets
Other non-current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Fair value of swaps |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
Notes receivable from ZIM |
|
34,821 |
|
33,899 |
| ||
Other non-current assets |
|
1,031 |
|
1,176 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
40,176 |
|
$ |
37,983 |
|
On October 30, 2009, the Company agreed with one of its charterers, Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (“ZIM”), revisions to charterparties for six of its vessels in operation, which kept the original charter terms in place, reducing the cash settlement of each charter hire by 17.5%, for a period ending on December 31, 2012, which would become a subsequent payment. Each subsequent payment, which accumulates in any financial quarter, is satisfied by callable exchange notes (the “CENs”). CENs were issued by ZIM once per financial quarter at a face value equal to the aggregate amount of such subsequent payments from that financial quarter plus a premium amount (being an amount calculated as if each such subsequent payment had accrued interest at the rate of 6% p.a. from the date when it would have been due under the original charter party until the relevant issue date for the CENs). Unless previously converted at the holder’s option into ZIM’s common stock (only upon ZIM becoming a publicly listed company) or redeemed partially prior to or in full in cash, on July 1, 2016, ZIM is obliged to redeem the CENs at their remaining nominal amount together with the 6% interest accrued up to that date in cash only. In this respect, the Company recorded notes receivable from ZIM in “Other non-current assets” of $34.8 million and $33.9 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. Furthermore, following ZIM’s request the Company has agreed to extend the 17.5% charter hire payment deferral until December 31, 2013. As of June 30, 2013, the amount outstanding related to the new charter hire deferral was $4.4 million and was reported under Accounts Receivable in the Company’s Balance Sheet. As part of the announced reorganization of its parent company Israel Corporation, Zim Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. is expected to restructure certain of its obligations. We do not know whether this restructuring will affect ZIM’s time charters, expiring in 2020 and 2021, for six of our vessels, or the $39.2 million aggregate outstanding receivable as of June 30, 2013. We will continue to monitor the situation on an ongoing basis and the impact, if any, this would have on the Company’s metrics.
In respect of the fair value of swaps, refer to Note 10a, Financial Instruments — Cash Flow Interest Rate Swap Hedges and Note 10b, Financial Instruments — Fair Value Interest Rate Swap Hedges.
|
7 Accrued Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Accrued payroll |
|
$ |
1,241 |
|
$ |
969 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
12,421 |
|
12,473 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
19,472 |
|
19,452 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
Accrued expenses mainly consisted of accrued realized losses on cash flow interest rate swaps of $15.0 million and $15.2 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, as well as other accruals related to the operation of the Company’s fleet of $4.5 million and $4.3 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
|
8 Other Current and Long-term Liabilities
Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Fair value of swaps |
|
$ |
120,881 |
|
$ |
130,100 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
365 |
|
365 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
121,246 |
|
$ |
130,465 |
|
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Fair value of swaps |
|
$ |
112,279 |
|
$ |
176,948 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
12,145 |
|
10,315 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
124,424 |
|
$ |
187,263 |
|
Other long-term liabilities mainly consist of $4.9 million and $4.8 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, in relation to a deferred fee accrued pursuant to the Bank Agreement (refer to Note 9, Long-Term Debt), which will be cash settled on December 31, 2014 and is recorded at amortized cost.
In respect of the fair value of swaps, refer to Note 10a, Financial Instruments — Cash Flow Interest Rate Swap Hedges.
|
9 Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
Lender |
|
As of |
|
Current |
|
Long-term |
|
As of |
|
Current |
|
Long-term |
| ||||||
The Royal Bank of Scotland |
|
$ |
686,597 |
|
$ |
4,934 |
|
$ |
681,663 |
|
$ |
686,800 |
|
$ |
3,771 |
|
$ |
683,029 |
|
HSH Nordbank |
|
33,280 |
|
4,774 |
|
28,506 |
|
35,000 |
|
6,123 |
|
28,877 |
| ||||||
The Export-Import Bank of Korea (“KEXIM”) |
|
34,126 |
|
10,369 |
|
23,757 |
|
39,311 |
|
10,369 |
|
28,942 |
| ||||||
The Export-Import Bank of Korea & ABN Amro |
|
73,734 |
|
11,250 |
|
62,484 |
|
79,359 |
|
11,250 |
|
68,109 |
| ||||||
Deutsche Bank |
|
179,064 |
|
2,119 |
|
176,945 |
|
180,000 |
|
2,406 |
|
177,594 |
| ||||||
Credit Agricole |
|
154,664 |
|
7,122 |
|
147,542 |
|
156,800 |
|
6,279 |
|
150,521 |
| ||||||
HSH Nordbank AG-Aegean Baltic Bank-Piraeus Bank |
|
658,160 |
|
4,092 |
|
654,068 |
|
658,160 |
|
— |
|
658,160 |
| ||||||
Credit Suisse |
|
219,347 |
|
7,779 |
|
211,568 |
|
221,100 |
|
6,076 |
|
215,024 |
| ||||||
ABN Amro-Lloyds TSB-National Bank of Greece |
|
250,806 |
|
8,245 |
|
242,561 |
|
253,200 |
|
6,966 |
|
246,234 |
| ||||||
Commerzbank-Credit Suisse- Credit Agricole |
|
295,285 |
|
14,097 |
|
281,188 |
|
298,500 |
|
11,401 |
|
287,099 |
| ||||||
The Royal Bank of Scotland (New Credit Facility) |
|
98,160 |
|
8,246 |
|
89,914 |
|
100,000 |
|
6,069 |
|
93,931 |
| ||||||
HSH Nordbank AG-Aegean Baltic Bank-Piraeus Bank (New Credit Facility) |
|
117,250 |
|
20,417 |
|
96,833 |
|
123,750 |
|
17,727 |
|
106,023 |
| ||||||
ABN Amro-Lloyds TSB-National Bank of Greece (New Credit Facility) |
|
34,588 |
|
5,281 |
|
29,307 |
|
37,100 |
|
5,438 |
|
31,662 |
| ||||||
Sinosure CEXIM-Citi-ABN Amro Credit Facility |
|
172,890 |
|
20,340 |
|
152,550 |
|
183,060 |
|
20,340 |
|
162,720 |
| ||||||
Club Facility (New Credit Facility) |
|
83,900 |
|
12,013 |
|
71,887 |
|
83,900 |
|
6,180 |
|
77,720 |
| ||||||
Citi—Eurobank Credit Facility |
|
77,212 |
|
4,863 |
|
72,349 |
|
80,000 |
|
4,681 |
|
75,319 |
| ||||||
Comprehensive Financing Plan exit fee accrued |
|
6,236 |
|
— |
|
6,236 |
|
4,354 |
|
— |
|
4,354 |
| ||||||
Fair value hedged debt |
|
1,869 |
|
— |
|
1,869 |
|
2,154 |
|
— |
|
2,154 |
| ||||||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,177,168 |
|
$ |
145,941 |
|
$ |
3,031,227 |
|
$ |
3,222,548 |
|
$ |
125,076 |
|
$ |
3,097,472 |
|
Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing |
|
$ |
150,448 |
|
$ |
57,388 |
|
$ |
93,060 |
|
$ |
179,142 |
|
$ |
57,388 |
|
$ |
121,754 |
|
All floating rate loans discussed above are collateralized by first and second preferred mortgages over the vessels financed, general assignment of all hire freights, income and earnings, the assignment of their insurance policies, as well as any proceeds from the sale of mortgaged vessels and the corporate guarantee of Danaos Corporation.
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter subsequent to June 30, 2013, are as follows (in thousands):
Payment due by period ended |
|
Fixed |
|
Variable |
|
Final Payment |
|
Total |
| ||||
June 30, 2014 |
|
$ |
129,273 |
|
$ |
16,668 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
145,941 |
|
June 30, 2015 |
|
142,862 |
|
15,835 |
|
— |
|
158,697 |
| ||||
June 30, 2016 |
|
168,810 |
|
81,895 |
|
— |
|
250,705 |
| ||||
June 30, 2017 |
|
192,367 |
|
186,607 |
|
— |
|
378,974 |
| ||||
June 30, 2018 |
|
169,336 |
|
175,275 |
|
— |
|
344,611 |
| ||||
June 30, 2019 and thereafter |
|
244,376 |
|
34,900 |
|
1,610,859 |
|
1,890,135 |
| ||||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,047,024 |
|
$ |
511,180 |
|
$ |
1,610,859 |
|
$ |
3,169,063 |
|
* The last payment due on December 31, 2018, includes the unamortized remaining principal debt balances under the restructuring agreement, as such amount will be determinable following the fixed and variable amortization.
The maturities of long-term debt for the twelve month periods subsequent to June 30, 2013 are based on the terms of the Bank Agreement, under which the Company was not required to repay any outstanding principal amounts under its existing credit facilities, other than the KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities which are not covered by the Bank Agreement, until May 15, 2013; thereafter until December 31, 2018 it is required to make quarterly principal payments in fixed amounts. In addition, the Company is required to make an additional payment in such amount that, together with the fixed principal payment, equals a certain percentage of its Actual Free Cash Flow of the preceding financial quarter. The table above includes both the fixed payments for which the Company has a contractual obligation, as well as the Company’s estimate of the future Actual Free Cash Flows and resulting variable amortization. The last payment due on December 31, 2018, will also include the unamortized remaining principal debt balances, as such amount will be determinable following the fixed and variable amortization.
Maturities of Hyundai Samho vendor financing for the next periods subsequent to June 30, 2013, are as follows (in thousands):
Payment due by period ended |
|
|
| |
June 30, 2014 |
|
$ |
57,388 |
|
June 30, 2015 |
|
57,388 |
| |
June 30, 2016 |
|
35,672 |
| |
Total vendor financing |
|
$ |
150,448 |
|
As of February 9, 2012, the Company signed a supplemental letter extending the terms of the August 12, 2010 supplemental letter through June 30, 2014, which amended the interest rate margin and the financial covenants of its KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facility. More specifically, the financial covenants were aligned with those set forth in the Bank Agreement (see below), and the interest rate margin was increased by 0.5 percentage points for the same period.
Bank Agreement
On January 24, 2011, the Company entered into a definitive agreement, which became effective on March 4, 2011, referred to as the Bank Agreement, that superseded, amended and supplemented the terms of each of the Company’s then-existing credit facilities (other than its credit facilities with KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro which are not covered thereby), and provided for, among other things, revised amortization schedules, maturities, interest rates, financial covenants, events of defaults, guarantee and security packages and approximately $425 million of new debt financing. Subject to the terms of the Bank Agreement and the intercreditor agreement (the “Intercreditor Agreement”), which the Company entered into with each of the lenders participating under the Bank Agreement to govern the relationships between the lenders thereunder, under the New Credit Facilities (as described and defined below) and under the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing described below, the lenders participating thereunder continue to provide the Company’s then-existing credit facilities and amended the covenants under the existing credit facilities in accordance with the terms of the Bank Agreement.
Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, borrowings under each of the Company’s existing credit facilities, other than the KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities which are not covered by the Bank Agreement, bear interest at an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.85%.
The Company is required to pay an amendment fee of $5.0 million on December 31, 2014. This amendment fee was accrued under the “Other long-term liabilities” in the consolidated balance sheet and is deferred and amortized over the life of the respective credit facilities with the effective interest method. In addition, the Company is required to pay exit fees, which are discussed in detail below.
Principal Payments
Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the Company was not required to repay any outstanding principal amounts under its existing credit facilities, other than the KEXIM and KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facilities which are not covered by the Bank Agreement, until May 15, 2013; thereafter until December 31, 2018, the Company is required to make quarterly principal payments in fixed amounts, in relation to the Company’s total debt commitments from the Company’s lenders under the Bank Agreement and New Credit Facilities, as specified in the table below:
|
|
February 15, |
|
May 15, |
|
August 15, |
|
November 15, |
|
December 31, |
|
Total |
|
2013 |
|
— |
|
19,481,395 |
|
21,167,103 |
|
21,482,169 |
|
— |
|
62,130,667 |
|
2014 |
|
22,722,970 |
|
21,942,530 |
|
22,490,232 |
|
24,654,040 |
|
— |
|
91,809,772 |
|
2015 |
|
26,736,647 |
|
27,021,750 |
|
25,541,180 |
|
34,059,102 |
|
— |
|
113,358,679 |
|
2016 |
|
30,972,971 |
|
36,278,082 |
|
32,275,598 |
|
43,852,513 |
|
— |
|
143,379,164 |
|
2017 |
|
44,938,592 |
|
36,690,791 |
|
35,338,304 |
|
31,872,109 |
|
— |
|
148,839,796 |
|
2018 |
|
34,152,011 |
|
37,585,306 |
|
44,398,658 |
|
45,333,618 |
|
65,969,274 |
|
227,438,867 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786,956,945 |
|
* The Company may elect to make the scheduled payments shown in the above table three months earlier.
Furthermore, an additional variable payment in such amount that, together with the fixed principal payment (as disclosed above), equals 92.5% of Actual Free Cash Flow of the preceding financial quarter until the earlier of (x) the date on which the Company’s consolidated net leverage is below 6:1 and (y) May 15, 2015; and thereafter through maturity, which will be December 31, 2018 for each covered credit facility, it will be required to make fixed quarterly principal payments in fixed amounts as specified in the Bank Agreement and described above plus an additional payment in such amount that, together with the fixed principal payment, equals 89.5% of Actual Free Cash Flow of the preceding financial quarter. In addition, any additional amounts of cash and cash equivalents, but during the final principal payment period described above only such additional amounts in excess of the greater of (1) $50 million of accumulated unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and (2) 2% of the Company’s consolidated debt, would be applied first to the prepayment of the New Credit Facilities and after the New Credit Facilities are repaid, to the existing credit facilities. The last payment due on December 31, 2018 will also include the unamortized remaining principal debt balances, as such amount will be determinable following the fixed and variable amortization.
Under the Bank Agreement, “Actual Free Cash Flow” with respect to each credit facility covered thereby is equal to revenue from the vessels collateralizing such facility, less the sum of (a) interest expense under such credit facility, (b) pro-rata portion of payments under its interest rate swap arrangements, (c) interest expense and scheduled amortization under the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing and (d) per vessel operating expenses and pro rata per vessel allocation of general and administrative expenses (which are not permitted to exceed the relevant budget by more than 20%), plus (e) the pro-rata share of operating cash flow of any Applicable Second Lien Vessel (which means, with respect to an existing facility, a vessel with respect to which the participating lenders under such facility have a second lien security interest and the first lien credit facility has been repaid in full).
Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the Company continues to be required to make any mandatory prepayments provided for under the terms of its existing credit facilities and is required to make additional prepayments as follows
· 50% of the first $300 million of net equity proceeds (including convertible debt and hybrid instruments), excluding the $200 million of net equity proceeds which was a condition to the Bank Agreement and were received in August 2010 for which there are no specified required uses, after entering into the Bank Agreement and 25% of any additional net equity proceeds thereafter until December 31, 2018; and
· any debt proceeds (after repayment of any underlying secured debt covered by vessels collateralizing the new borrowings) (excluding the New Credit Facilities, the Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility and the Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing),
which amounts would first be applied to repayment of amounts outstanding under the New Credit Facilities and then to the existing credit facilities. Any equity proceeds retained by the Company and not used within 12 months for certain specified purposes would be applied for prepayment of the New Credit Facilities and then to the existing credit facilities. The Company would also be required to prepay the portion of a credit facility attributable to a particular vessel upon the sale or total loss of such vessel; the termination or loss of an existing charter for a vessel, unless replaced within a specified period by a similar charter acceptable to the lenders; or the termination of a newbuilding contract. The Company’s respective lenders under its existing credit facilities covered by the Bank Agreement and the New Credit Facilities may, at their option, require the Company to repay in full amounts outstanding under such respective credit facilities, upon a “Change of Control” of the Company, which for these purposes is defined as (i) Dr. Coustas ceasing to be its Chief Executive Officer, (ii) its common stock ceasing to be listed on the NYSE (or Nasdaq or other recognized stock exchange), (iii) a change in the ultimate beneficial ownership of the capital stock of any of its subsidiaries or ultimate control of the voting rights of those shares, (iv) Dr. Coustas and members of his family ceasing to collectively own over one-third of the voting interest in its outstanding capital stock or (v) any other person or group controlling more than 20% of the voting power of its outstanding capital stock.
Covenants and Events of Default
Under the Bank Agreement, the financial covenants under each of the Company’s existing credit facilities (other than under the KEXIM-ABN Amro credit facility which is not covered thereby, but which has been aligned with those covenants below through June 30, 2014 under the supplemental letter dated August 12, 2010 and amendment thereto dated February 9, 2012 and our KEXIM credit facility, which contains only a collateral coverage covenant of 130%), have been reset to require the Company to:
· maintain a ratio of (i) the market value of all of the vessels in the Company’s fleet, on a charter-inclusive basis, plus the net realizable value of any additional collateral, to (ii) the Company’s consolidated total debt above specified minimum levels gradually increasing from 90% through December 31, 2011 to 130% from September 30, 2017 through September 30, 2018;
· maintain a minimum ratio of (i) the market value of the nine vessels (Hyundai Smart, Hyundai Speed, Hyundai Ambition, Hyundai Together, Hyundai Tenacity, Hanjin Greece, Hanjin Italy, Hanjin Germany and CMA CGM Rabelais) collateralizing the New Credit Facilities, calculated on a charter-free basis, plus the net realizable value of any additional collateral, to (ii) the Company’s aggregate debt outstanding under the New Credit Facilities of 100% from September 30, 2012 through September 30, 2018;
· maintain minimum free consolidated unrestricted cash and cash equivalents, less the amount of the aggregate variable principal amortization amounts, described above, of $30.0 million at the end of each calendar quarter, other than during 2012 when the Company will be required to maintain a minimum amount of $20.0 million;
· ensure that the Company’s (i) consolidated total debt less unrestricted cash and cash equivalents to (ii) consolidated EBITDA (defined as net income before interest, gains or losses under any hedging arrangements, tax, depreciation, amortization and any other non-cash item, capital gains or losses realized from the sale of any vessel, finance charges and capital losses on vessel cancellations and before any non-recurring items and excluding any accrued interest due to us but not received on or before the end of the relevant period; provided that non-recurring items excluded from this calculation shall not exceed 5% of EBITDA calculated in this manner) for the last twelve months does not exceed a maximum ratio gradually decreasing from 12:1 on December 31, 2010 to 4.75:1 on September 30, 2018;
· ensure that the ratio of the Company’s (i) consolidated EBITDA for the last twelve months to (ii) net interest expense (defined as interest expense (excluding capitalized interest), less interest income, less realized gains on interest rate swaps (excluding capitalized gains) and plus realized losses on interest rate swaps (excluding capitalized losses)) exceeds a minimum level of 1.50:1 through September 30, 2013 and thereafter gradually increasing to 2.80:1 by September 30, 2018; and
· maintain a consolidated market value adjusted net worth (defined as the amount by which the Company’s total consolidated assets adjusted for the market value of the Company’s vessels in the water less cash and cash equivalents in excess of the Company’s debt service requirements exceeds the Company’s total consolidated liabilities after excluding the net asset or liability relating to the fair value of derivatives as reflected in the Company’s financial statements for the relevant period) of at least $400 million.
For the purpose of these covenants, the market value of the Company’s vessels will be calculated, except as otherwise indicated above, on a charter-inclusive basis (using the present value of the “bareboat-equivalent” time charter income from such charter) so long as a vessel’s charter has a remaining duration at the time of valuation of more than 12 months plus the present value of the residual value of the relevant vessel (generally equivalent to the charter free value of such a vessel at the age such vessel would be at the expiration of the existing time charter). The market value for newbuilding vessels, all of which currently have multi-year charters, would equal the lesser of such amount and the newbuilding vessel’s book value.
Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the existing credit facilities also contain customary events of default, including those relating to cross-defaults to other indebtedness, defaults under its swap agreements, non-compliance with security documents, material adverse changes to its business, a Change of Control as described above, a change in its Chief Executive Officer, its common stock ceasing to be listed on the NYSE (or Nasdaq or another recognized stock exchange), a change in, or breach of the management agreement by the manager for the vessels securing the respective credit facilities and cancellation or amendment of the time charters (unless replaced with a similar time charter with a charterer acceptable to the lenders) for the vessels securing the respective credit facilities.
Under the terms of the Bank Agreement, the Company generally will not be permitted to incur any further financial indebtedness or provide any new liens or security interests, unless such security is provided for the equal and ratable benefit of each of the lenders party to the Intercreditor Agreement, other than security arising by operation of law or in connection with the refinancing of outstanding indebtedness, with the consent, not to be unreasonably withheld, of all lenders with a lien on the security pledged against such outstanding indebtedness. In addition, the Company would not be permitted to pay cash dividends or repurchase shares of its capital stock unless (i) its consolidated net leverage is below 6:1 for four consecutive quarters and (ii) the ratio of the aggregate market value of its vessels to its outstanding indebtedness exceeds 125% for four consecutive quarters and provided that an event of default has not occurred and the Company is not, and after giving effect to the payment of the dividend, in breach of any covenant.
Collateral and Guarantees
Each of the Company’s existing credit facilities and swap arrangements, to the extent applicable, continue to be secured by their previous collateral on the same basis, and received, to the extent not previously provided, pledges of the shares of the Company’s subsidiaries owning the vessels collateralizing the applicable facilities, cross-guarantees from each subsidiary owning the vessels collateralizing such facilities, assignment of the refund guarantees in relation to any newbuildings funded by such facilities and other customary shipping industry collateral.
New Credit Facilities (Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank, RBS, ABN Amro Club facility, Club Facility and Citi-Eurobank)
On January 24, 2011, the Company entered into agreements for the following new term loan credit facilities (“New Credit Facilities”):
(i) a $123.8 million credit facility provided by HSH, which is secured by Hyundai Speed, Hanjin Italy and CMA CGM Rabelais and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto;
(ii) a $100.0 million credit facility provided by RBS, which is secured by Hyundai Smart and Hanjin Greece and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto;
(iii) a $37.1 million credit facility with ABN Amro and lenders participating under the Bank Agreement which is secured by Hanjin Germany and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto;
(iv) a $83.9 million new club credit facility to be provided, on a pro rata basis, by the other existing lenders participating under the Bank Agreement, which is secured by Hyundai Together and Hyundai Tenacity and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto; and
(v) a $80 million credit facility with Citibank and Eurobank, which is secured by Hyundai Ambition and customary shipping industry collateral related thereto ((i)-(v), collectively, the “New Credit Facilities”).
As of June 30, 2013, $411.1 million was outstanding under the above New Credit Facilities and there were nil undrawn funds available.
Borrowings under each of the New Credit Facilities above bear interest at an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 1.85%, subject, on and after January 1, 2013, to increases in the applicable margin to: (i) 2.50% if the aggregate outstanding indebtedness thereunder exceeds $276 million, (ii) 3.00% if the aggregate outstanding indebtedness thereunder exceeds $326 million and (iii) 3.50% if the aggregate outstanding indebtedness thereunder exceeds $376 million.
Principal Payments
Under the Bank Agreement, the Company was not required to repay any outstanding principal amounts under its New Credit Facilities until May 15, 2013 and thereafter it is required to make quarterly principal payments in fixed amounts as specified in the Bank Agreement plus an additional quarterly variable amortization payment, all as described above under “—Bank Agreement—Principal Payments.”
Covenants, Events of Default and Other Terms
The New Credit Facilities contain substantially the same financial and operating covenants, events of default, dividend restrictions and other terms and conditions as applicable to the Company’s existing credit facilities as revised under the Bank Agreement described above.
Collateral and Guarantees
The collateral described above relating to the newbuildings financed by the respective credit facilities, will be (other than in respect of the CMA CGM Rabelais) subject to a limited participation by Hyundai Samho in any enforcement thereof until repayment of the related Hyundai Samho Vendor financing (described below) for such vessels. In addition lenders who participate in the new $83.9 million club credit facility described above received a lien on Hyundai Together and Hyundai Tenacity as additional security in respect of the existing credit facilities the Company has with such lenders. The lenders under the other New Credit Facilities also received a lien on the respective vessels securing such New Credit Facilities as additional collateral in respect of its existing credit facilities and interest rate swap arrangements with such lenders and Citibank and Eurobank also received a second lien on Hyundai Ambition as collateral in respect of its previously unsecured interest rate arrangements with them.
In addition, Aegean Baltic—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank also received a second lien on the Deva (ex Maersk), the CSCL Europe and the CSCL Pusan as collateral in respect of all borrowings from Aegean Baltic—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank and RBS also received a second lien on the Derby D, CSCL America and the CSCL Le Havre as collateral in respect of all borrrowings from RBS.
The Company’s obligations under the New Credit Facilities are guaranteed by its subsidiaries owning the vessels collateralizing the respective credit facilities. The Company’s Manager has also provided an undertaking to continue to provide the Company with management services and to subordinate its rights to the rights of its lenders, the security trustee and applicable hedge counterparties.
Sinosure-CEXIM-Citi-ABN Amro Credit Facility
On February 21, 2011, the Company entered into a bank agreement with Citibank, acting as agent, ABN Amro and the Export-Import Bank of China (“CEXIM”) for a senior secured credit facility (as amended and restated, as described below, the “Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility”) of up to $203.4 million, in three tranches each in an amount equal to the lesser of $67.8 million and 60.0% of the contract price for the newbuilding vessels, CMA CGM Tancredi, CMA CGM Bianca and CMA CGM Samson, securing such tranche for post-delivery financing of these vessels. The Company took delivery of the respective vessels in 2011. The China Export & Credit Insurance Corporation, or Sinosure, covers a number of political and commercial risks associated with each tranche of the credit facility.
Borrowings under the Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility bear interest at an annual interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 2.85% payable semi-annually in arrears. The Company is required to repay principal amounts drawn under each tranche of the Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility in consecutive semi-annual installments over a ten-year period commencing after the delivery of the respective newbuilding being financed by such amount through the final maturity date of the respective tranches and repay the respective tranche in full upon the loss of the respective newbuilding.
As of June 30, 2013, $172.9 million was outstanding under the credit facility and there were no undrawn funds available.
Covenants, Events of Default and Other Terms
The Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility was amended and restated, effective on June 30, 2013, to align its financial covenants with the Company’s Bank Agreement (except for the minimum ratio of the charter free market value of certain vessels, as described in the Bank Agreement, which is not applicable) described above and continues to require the Company to maintain a minimum ratio of the market value of the vessel collateralizing a tranche of the facility to debt outstanding under such tranche of 125%.
The Sinosure-CEXIM credit facility also contains customary events of default, including those relating to cross-defaults to other indebtedness, defaults under its swap agreements, non-compliance with security documents, material adverse changes to its business, a Change of Control as described above, a change in its Chief Executive Officer, its common stock ceasing to be listed on the NYSE (or Nasdaq or another recognized stock exchange), a change in, or breach of the management agreement by, the manager for the mortgaged vessels and cancellation or amendment of the time charters (unless replaced with a similar time charter with a charterer acceptable to the lenders) for the mortgaged vessels.
The Company will not be permitted to pay cash dividends or repurchase shares of its capital stock unless (i) its consolidated net leverage is below 6:1 for four consecutive quarters and (ii) the ratio of the aggregate market value of its vessels to its outstanding indebtedness exceeds 125% for four consecutive quarters and provided that an event of default has not occurred and the Company is not, and after giving effect to the payment of the dividend is not, in breach of any covenant
Collateral
The Sinosure-CEXIM Credit Facility is secured by customary post-delivery shipping industry collateral with respect to the vessels, the CMA CGM Tancredi, the CMA CGM Bianca and the CMA CGM Samson, securing the respective tranche.
Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing
The Company entered into an agreement with Hyundai Samho Heavy Industries (“Hyundai Samho”) for a financing facility of $190.0 million in respect of eight of its newbuilding containerships being built by Hyundai Samho, Hyundai Smart, Hyundai Speed, Hyundai Ambition, Hyundai Together, Hyundai Tenacity, Hanjin Greece, Hanjin Italy and Hanjin Germany, in the form of delayed payment of a portion of the final installment for each such newbuilding. As of June 30, 2013, outstanding balance of the respective credit facility was $150.4 million.
Borrowings under this facility bear interest at a fixed interest rate of 8%. The Company will be required to repay principal amounts under this financing facility in six consecutive semi-annual installments commencing one and a half years, in the case of three of the newbuilding vessels being financed, and in seven consecutive semi-annual installments commencing one year, in the case of the other five newbuilding vessels, after the delivery of the respective newbuilding being financed. This financing facility does not require the Company to comply with financial covenants, but contains customary events of default, including those relating to cross-defaults. This financing facility is secured by second priority collateral related to the newbuilding vessels being financed.
Exit Fees
The Company will be required to pay an Initial Exit Fee of $15.0 million. Furthermore, the Company will be required to pay an Additional Exit Fee of $10.0 million, if it does not repay at least $150.0 million in the aggregate with equity proceeds by December 31, 2013. Both Exit Fees, in the respective proportion to Existing Facilities and New Money Facilities, are payable the earlier of (a) December 31, 2018 and (b) the date on which the respective facilities are repaid in full. The Exit Fees will accrete in the condensed consolidated Statement of Income over the life of the respective facilities (with the effective interest method) and are reported under “Long-term debt, net of current portion” in the condensed consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company has recognized an amount of $6.2 million and $4.4 million as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
Credit Facilities Summary Table
Lender |
|
Outstanding |
|
Collateral Vessels |
| |
The Royal Bank of Scotland(2) |
|
$ |
686.6 |
|
The Hyundai Progress, the Hyundai Highway, the Hyundai Bridge, the Hyundai Federal (ex APL Federal), the Zim Monaco, the Hanjin Buenos Aires, the Hanjin Versailles, the Hanjin Algeciras, the CMA CGM Racine and the CMA CGM Melisande |
|
Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank(3) |
|
$ |
658.2 |
|
The Kalamata, the Komodo, the Commodore (ex Hyundai Commodore), the Hyundai Duke (ex APL Duke), the Marathonas, the Messologi, the Mytilini, the Hope, the Lotus, the Hyundai Vladivostok, the Hyundai Advance, the Hyundai Stride, the Hyundai Future, the Hyundai Sprinter, the Amalia C and the Niledutch Zebra |
|
Credit Agricole |
|
$ |
154.7 |
|
The CMA CGM Moliere and the CMA CGM Musset |
|
Deutsche Bank |
|
$ |
179.1 |
|
The Zim Rio Grande, the Zim Sao Paolo and the Zim Kingston |
|
Credit Suisse |
|
$ |
219.3 |
|
The Zim Luanda, the CMA CGM Nerval and the YM Mandate |
|
ABN Amro—Lloyds TSB—National Bank of Greece |
|
$ |
250.8 |
|
The YM Colombo (ex SNL Colombo), the YM Seattle, the YM Vancouver and the YM Singapore |
|
Commerzbank—Credit Suisse—Credit Agricole |
|
$ |
295.3 |
|
The ZIM Dalian, the Hanjin Santos, the YM Maturity, the Hanjin Constantza and the CMA CGM Attila |
|
HSH Nordbank |
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
The Deva and the Derby D |
|
KEXIM |
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
The CSCL Europe and the CSCL America |
|
KEXIM-ABN Amro |
|
$ |
73.7 |
|
The CSCL Pusan and the CSCL Le Havre |
|
Aegean Baltic—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank(3) |
|
$ |
117.2 |
|
The Hyundai Speed, the Hanjin Italy and the CMA CGM Rabelais |
|
RBS(2) |
|
$ |
98.2 |
|
The Hyundai Smart and the Hanjin Germany |
|
ABN Amro Club Facility |
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
The Hanjin Greece |
|
Club Facility |
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
The Hyundai Together and the Hyundai Tenacity |
|
Citi-Eurobank |
|
$ |
77.2 |
|
The Hyundai Ambition |
|
Sinosure-CEXIM |
|
$ |
172.9 |
|
The CMA CGM Tancredi, the CMA CGM Bianca and the CMA CGM Samson |
|
Vendor Financing |
| |||||
Hyundai Samho |
|
$ |
150.4 |
|
Second priority liens on the Hyundai Smart, the Hyundai Speed, the Hyundai Ambition, the Hyundai Together, the Hyundai Tenacity, the Hanjin Greece, the Hanjin Italy and the Hanjin Germany |
|
(1) As of June 30, 2013.
(2) Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Derby D, the CSCL America and the CSCL Le Havre.
(3) Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Deva, the CSCL Europe and the CSCL Pusan.
As of June 30, 2013, there was no remaining borrowing availability under the Company’s credit facilities. The Company was in compliance with the covenants under its Bank Agreement and its other credit facilities as of June 30, 2013.
|
10 Financial Instruments
The principal financial assets of the Company consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and other assets. The principal financial liabilities of the Company consist of long-term bank loans, accounts payable and derivatives.
Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company only uses derivatives for economic hedging purposes. The following is a summary of the Company’s risk management strategies and the effect of these strategies on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
Interest Rate Risk: Interest rate risk arises on bank borrowings. The Company monitors the interest rate on borrowings closely to ensure that the borrowings are maintained at favorable rates.
Concentration of Credit Risk: Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash, trade accounts receivable and derivatives. The Company places its temporary cash investments, consisting mostly of deposits, with established financial institutions. The Company performs periodic evaluations of the relative credit standing of those financial institutions that are considered in the Company’s investment strategy. The Company is exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to derivative instruments, however, the Company limits this exposure by diversifying among counterparties with high credit ratings. The Company depends upon a limited number of customers for a large part of its revenues. Credit risk with respect to trade accounts receivable is generally managed by the selection of customers among the major liner companies in the world and their dispersion across many geographic areas. The Company’s maximum exposure to credit risk is mainly limited to the carrying value of its derivative instruments. The Company is not a party to master netting arrangements.
Fair Value: The carrying amounts reflected in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets of financial assets and liabilities excluding long-term bank loans approximate their respective fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The fair values of long-term floating rate bank loans approximate the recorded values, generally due to their variable interest rates. The fair value of the swap agreements equals the amount that would be paid by the Company to cancel the swaps.
Interest Rate Swaps: The off-balance sheet risk in outstanding swap agreements involves both the risk of a counter-party not performing under the terms of the contract and the risk associated with changes in market value. The Company monitors its positions, the credit ratings of counterparties and the level of contracts it enters into with any one party. The counterparties to these contracts are major financial institutions. The Company has a policy of entering into contracts with parties that meet stringent qualifications and, given the high level of credit quality of its derivative counter-parties, the Company does not believe it is necessary to obtain collateral arrangements.
a. Cash Flow Interest Rate Swap Hedges
The Company, according to its long-term strategic plan to maintain relative stability in its interest rate exposure, has decided to swap part of its interest expense from floating to fixed. To this effect, the Company has entered into interest rate swap transactions with varying start and maturity dates, in order to pro-actively and efficiently manage its floating rate exposure.
These interest rate swaps are designed to economically hedge the variability of interest cash flows arising from floating rate debt, attributable to movements in three-month USD$ LIBOR. According to the Company’s Risk Management Accounting Policy, and after putting in place the formal documentation required by hedge accounting in order to designate these swaps as hedging instruments, as from their inception, these interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting, and, accordingly, from that time until June 30, 2012, only hedge ineffectiveness amounts arising from the differences in the change in fair value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item were recognized in the Company’s earnings. Assessment and measurement of prospective and retrospective effectiveness for these interest rate swaps were performed on a quarterly basis. For qualifying cash flow hedges, the fair value gain or loss associated with the effective portion of the cash flow hedge was recognized initially in stockholders’ equity, and recognized to the Statement of Income in the periods when the hedged item affects profit or loss.
On July 1, 2012, the Company elected to prospectively de-designate cash flow interest rate swaps for which it was obtaining hedge accounting treatment due to the compliance burden associated with this accounting policy. As a result, all changes in the fair value of the Company’s cash flow interest rate swap agreements are recorded in earnings under “Unrealized and Realized Losses on Derivatives” from the de-designation date forward. The Company evaluated whether it is probable that the previously hedged forecasted interest payments are probable to not occur in the originally specified time period. The Company has concluded that the previously hedged forecasted interest payments are probable of occurring. Therefore, unrealized gains or losses in accumulated other comprehensive loss associated with the previously designated cash flow interest rate swaps will remain in accumulated other comprehensive loss and recognized in earnings when the interest payments will be recognized. If such interest payments were to be identified as being probable of not occurring, the accumulated other comprehensive loss balance pertaining to these amounts would be reversed through earnings immediately.
The interest rate swap agreements converting floating interest rate exposure into fixed were as follows (in thousands):
Counter-party |
|
Contract |
|
Effective |
|
Termination |
|
Notional |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Floating Rate |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
| |||
RBS |
|
03/09/2007 |
|
3/15/2010 |
|
3/15/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
5.07 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
$ |
(16,003 |
) |
$ |
(20,759 |
) |
RBS |
|
03/16/2007 |
|
3/20/2009 |
|
3/20/2014 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.922 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(6,716 |
) |
(11,253 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/28/2006 |
|
11/28/2008 |
|
11/28/2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.855 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(1,925 |
) |
(4,172 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/28/2006 |
|
11/28/2008 |
|
11/28/2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.875 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(1,934 |
) |
(4,190 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
12/01/2006 |
|
11/28/2008 |
|
11/28/2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.78 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(1,894 |
) |
(4,103 |
) | ||
HSH Nordbank |
|
12/06/2006 |
|
12/8/2009 |
|
12/8/2014 |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
4.855 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(25,866 |
) |
(34,952 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
04/17/2007 |
|
4/17/2008 |
|
4/17/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
5.124 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(16,919 |
) |
(21,792 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
04/20/2007 |
|
4/20/2010 |
|
4/20/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
5.1775 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(17,186 |
) |
(22,116 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
09/13/2007 |
|
9/15/2009 |
|
9/15/2014 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.9775 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(11,284 |
) |
(15,882 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/16/2007 |
|
11/22/2010 |
|
11/22/2015 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
5.07 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(10,839 |
) |
(13,424 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/15/2007 |
|
11/19/2010 |
|
11/19/2015 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
5.12 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(10,920 |
) |
(13,523 |
) | ||
Eurobank |
|
12/06/2007 |
|
12/10/2010 |
|
12/10/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.8125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(21,054 |
) |
(25,725 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
10/23/2007 |
|
10/25/2009 |
|
10/27/2014 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
4.9975 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(15,437 |
) |
(21,241 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
11/02/2007 |
|
11/6/2010 |
|
11/6/2015 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
5.1 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(26,749 |
) |
(33,273 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
11/26/2007 |
|
11/29/2010 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.98 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(10,658 |
) |
(13,243 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
02/07/2008 |
|
2/11/2011 |
|
2/11/2016 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.695 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(21,234 |
) |
(26,357 |
) | ||
Eurobank |
|
02/11/2008 |
|
5/31/2011 |
|
5/31/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.755 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(16,542 |
) |
(21,043 |
) | ||
Fair value of swap liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(233,160 |
) |
$ |
(307,048 |
) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
ABN Amro |
|
06/6/2013 |
|
1/4/2016 |
|
12/31/2016 |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
1.4975 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
1,124 |
|
— |
| ||
ABN Amro |
|
06/4/2013 |
|
1/4/2016 |
|
12/31/2016 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
1.4125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
1,074 |
|
— |
| ||
Fair value of swap assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
$ |
— |
|
The Company recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income unrealized gains of $76.0 million and $2.2 million in relation to fair value changes of interest rate swaps for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and hedge ineffectiveness gains of $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Furthermore, unrealized losses of $58.8 million were reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss to earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (following the hedge accounting discontinuance as of July 1, 2012). The total fair value change of the interest rate swaps for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, amounted to $76.1 million and $42.7 million, respectively.
The variable-rate interest on specific borrowings was associated with vessels under construction and was capitalized as a cost of the specific vessels. In accordance with the accounting guidance on derivatives and hedging, the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) related to realized gains or losses on cash flow hedges that have been entered into and qualify for hedge accounting, in order to hedge the variability of that interest, were classified under other comprehensive income/(loss) and are reclassified into earnings over the depreciable life of the constructed asset, since that depreciable life coincides with the amortization period for the capitalized interest cost on the debt. Deferred realized losses on cash flow hedges of nil and $7.0 million were recorded in other comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In addition, an amount of $2.0 million and $1.5 million was reclassified into earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, representing its amortization over the depreciable life of the vessels. Following the delivery of all of our vessels under construction, deferral of realized losses on cash flow hedges was eliminated since June 30, 2012.
|
|
Three months |
|
Three months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Total realized losses |
|
$ |
(36.6 |
) |
$ |
(40.4 |
) |
Realized losses deferred in Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
— |
|
2.2 |
| ||
Realized losses expensed in condensed consolidated Statements of Income |
|
(36.6 |
) |
(38.2 |
) | ||
Amortization of deferred realized losses |
|
(1.0 |
) |
(0.8 |
) | ||
Unrealized gains |
|
12.6 |
|
1.3 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized losses on cash flow interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(25.0 |
) |
$ |
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
Six months |
|
Six months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Total realized losses |
|
$ |
(72.5 |
) |
$ |
(80.4 |
) |
Realized losses deferred in Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
— |
|
7.0 |
| ||
Realized losses expensed in condensed consolidated Statements of Income |
|
(72.5 |
) |
(73.4 |
) | ||
Amortization of deferred realized losses |
|
(2.0 |
) |
(1.5 |
) | ||
Unrealized gains |
|
17.2 |
|
4.0 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized losses on cash flow interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(57.3 |
) |
$ |
(70.9 |
) |
b. Fair Value Interest Rate Swap Hedges
These interest rate swaps are designed to economically hedge the fair value of the fixed rate loan facilities against fluctuations in the market interest rates by converting the Company’s fixed rate loan facilities to floating rate debt. Pursuant to the adoption of the Company’s Risk Management Accounting Policy, and after putting in place the formal documentation required by hedge accounting in order to designate these swaps as hedging instruments, as of June 15, 2006, these interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting, and, accordingly, from that time until June 30, 2012, hedge ineffectiveness amounts arising from the differences in the change in fair value of the hedging instrument and the hedged item were recognized in the Company’s earnings. The Company considered its strategic use of interest rate swaps to be a prudent method of managing interest rate sensitivity, as it prevented earnings from being exposed to undue risk posed by changes in interest rates. Assessment and measurement of prospective and retrospective effectiveness for these interest rate swaps was performed on a quarterly basis, on the financial statement and earnings reporting dates.
On July 1, 2012, the Company elected to prospectively de-designate fair value interest rate swaps for which it was applying hedge accounting treatment due to the compliance burden associated with this accounting policy. All changes in the fair value of the Company’s fair value interest rate swap agreements continue to be recorded in earnings under “Unrealized and Realized Losses on Derivatives” from the de-designation date forward.
The Company evaluated whether it is probable that the previously hedged forecasted interest payments will not occur in the originally specified time period. The Company has concluded that the previously hedged forecasted interest payments continue to be probable of occurring. Therefore, the fair value of the hedged item associated with the previously designated fair value interest rate swaps will be frozen and recognized in earnings when the interest payments are recognized. If such interest payments were to be identified as being probable of not occurring, the fair value of hedged debt balance pertaining to these amounts would be reversed through earnings immediately.
The interest rate swap agreements converting fixed interest rate exposure into floating were as follows (in thousands):
Counter party |
|
Contract |
|
Effective |
|
Termination |
|
Notional |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Floating Rate |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
| |||
RBS |
|
11/15/2004 |
|
12/15/2004 |
|
8/27/2016 |
|
$ |
60,528 |
|
5.0125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA + 0.835 |
% p.a. |
$ |
1,012 |
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
RBS |
|
11/15/2004 |
|
11/17/2004 |
|
11/2/2016 |
|
$ |
62,342 |
|
5.0125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA + 0.855 |
% p.a. |
1,114 |
|
1,518 |
| ||
Total fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,126 |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
The total fair value change of the interest rate swaps for the period from January 1, 2013 until June 30, 2013, amounted to $0.8 million loss, and is included in the condensed consolidated statement of income in “Unrealized and realized loss on derivatives”. The related asset of $2.1 million is shown under “Other non-current assets” in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. The Company reclassified from “Long-term debt, net of current portion”, where its fair value of hedged item was recorded, to its earnings unrealized gains of $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2013 (following the hedge accounting discontinuance as of July 1, 2012).
|
|
Three months |
|
Three months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Unrealized losses on swap asset |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
Unrealized gains on fair value of hedged debt |
|
— |
|
0.3 |
| ||
Amortization of fair value of hedged debt |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
| ||
Realized gains |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized gains on fair value interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
Six months |
|
Six months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Unrealized losses on swap asset |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
Unrealized gains on fair value of hedged debt |
|
— |
|
0.6 |
| ||
Amortization of fair value of hedged debt |
|
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
| ||
Realized gains |
|
0.7 |
|
0.9 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized gains on fair value interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
c. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value hierarchy has three levels based on the reliability of the inputs used to determine fair value.
Level I: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these items does not entail a significant amount of judgment.
Level II: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at the measurement date.
Level III: Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of June 30, 2013.
The following tables present the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and are categorized using the fair value hierarchy.
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2013 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
233,160 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
233,160 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
307,048 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
307,048 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Interest rate swap contracts are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value is determined based on inputs that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. Such instruments are typically classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair values of the interest rate swap contracts have been calculated by discounting the projected future cash flows of both the fixed rate and variable rate interest payments. Projected interest payments are calculated using the appropriate prevailing market forward rates and are discounted using the zero-coupon curve derived from the swap yield curve. Refer to Note 10(a)-(b) above for further information on the Company’s interest rate swap contracts.
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance of its counterparties in relation to these financial instruments. As of June 30, 2013, these financial instruments are in the counterparties’ favor. The Company has considered its risk of non-performance and of its counterparties in accordance with the relevant guidance of fair value accounting. The Company performs evaluations of its counterparties for credit risk through ongoing monitoring of their financial health and risk profiles to identify risk or changes in their credit ratings.
The estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
As of June 30, 2013 |
|
As of December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
75,034 |
|
$ |
75,034 |
|
$ |
55,628 |
|
$ |
55,628 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
18,841 |
|
$ |
18,841 |
|
$ |
3,251 |
|
$ |
3,251 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
10,669 |
|
$ |
10,669 |
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
Due from related parties |
|
$ |
8,052 |
|
$ |
8,052 |
|
$ |
12,664 |
|
$ |
12,664 |
|
Notes receivable from ZIM |
|
$ |
34,821 |
|
$ |
34,503 |
|
$ |
33,899 |
|
$ |
34,071 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
12,573 |
|
$ |
12,573 |
|
$ |
13,982 |
|
$ |
13,982 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
$ |
3,177,168 |
|
$ |
3,178,764 |
|
$ |
3,222,548 |
|
$ |
3,223,337 |
|
Vendor financing, including current portion |
|
$ |
150,448 |
|
$ |
149,651 |
|
$ |
179,142 |
|
$ |
179,500 |
|
The estimated fair value of the financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2013 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $ ) |
| ||||||||||
Notes receivable from ZIM(1) |
|
$ |
34,503 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
34,503 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Long-term debt, including current portion(2) |
|
$ |
3,178,764 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
$3,178,764 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Vendor financing, including current portion(3) |
|
$ |
149,651 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
149,651 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Accrued liabilities(4) |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Notes receivable from ZIM(1) |
|
$ |
34,071 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
34,071 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Long-term debt, including current portion(2) |
|
$ |
3,223,337 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
3,223,337 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Vendor financing, including current portion(3) |
|
$ |
179,500 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
179,500 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Accrued liabilities(4) |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
$ |
— |
|
(1) The fair value is estimated based on currently available information on the Company’s counterparty, other contracts with similar terms, remaining maturities and interest rates.
(2) The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated based on currently available debt with similar contract terms, interest rate and remaining maturities, as well as taking into account our creditworthiness.
(3) The fair value of the Company’s Vendor financing is estimated based on currently available financing with similar contract terms, interest rate and remaining maturities, as well as taking into account our creditworthiness.
(4) The fair value of the Company’s accrued liabilities, which mainly consists of accrued interest on our credit facilities and accrued realized losses on our cash flow interest rate swaps, is estimated based on currently available debt and swap agreements with similar contract terms, interest rates and remaining maturities, as well as taking into account our creditworthiness.
|
11 Contingencies
On November 22, 2010, a purported Company shareholder filed a derivative complaint in the High Court of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. The derivative complaint names as defendants seven of the eight members of the Company’s board of directors at the time the complaint was filed. The derivative complaint challenges the amendments in 2009 and 2010 to the Company’s management agreement with Danaos Shipping and certain aspects of the sale of common stock in August 2010. The complaint includes counts for breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. On February 11, 2011, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the Complaint. After briefing was completed, the Court heard oral argument on October 26, 2011. On December 21, 2011, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss but gave the plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff filed the amended complaint on January 30, 2012. The amended complaint names the same parties and bases its claims on the same transactions. The Company has moved to dismiss the amended complaint and completed briefing on that motion on July 16, 2012. A hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss was held on April 24, 2013. On July 3, 2013, the Court granted the Company’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint with prejudice. The Plaintiff has until August 2, 2013 to file an appeal with the Supreme Court of the Marshall Islands.
Other than as described above, there are no material legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or to which any of its properties are the subject, or other contingencies that the Company is aware of, other than routine litigation incidental to the Company’s business.
|
12 Stockholders’ Equity
As of April 18, 2008, the Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee approved incentive compensation of Manager’s employees with its shares from time to time, after specific for each such time, decision by the compensation committee and the Board of Directors in order to provide a means of compensation in the form of free shares to certain employees of the Manager of the Company’s common stock. The plan was effective as of December 31, 2008. Pursuant to the terms of the plan, employees of the Manager may receive (from time to time) shares of the Company’s common stock as additional compensation for their services offered during the preceding period. The stock will have no vesting period and the employee will own the stock immediately after grant. The total amount of stock to be granted to employees of the Manager will be at the Company’s Board of Directors’ discretion only and there will be no contractual obligation for any stock to be granted as part of the employees’ compensation package in future periods. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, the Company had not granted any shares under the plan and it issued 35,710 new shares of common stock, which were distributed to the employees of the Manager in full settlement of prior grants.
The Company has also established the Directors Share Payment Plan under its 2006 equity compensation plan. The purpose of the plan is to provide a means of payment of all or a portion of compensation payable to directors of the Company in the form of Company’s Common Stock. The plan was effective as of April 18, 2008. Each member of the Board of Directors of the Company may participate in the plan. Pursuant to the terms of the plan, directors may elect to receive in Common Stock all or a portion of their compensation. During 2012, one director elected to receive in Company shares 50% of his compensation and one director elected to receive in Company shares 100% of his compensation only for the first quarter of 2012. During the six months ended June 30, 2013, none of the directors elected to receive their compensation in Company shares. Following December 31 of each year, the Company delivers to each Director the number of shares represented by the rights credited to their Share Payment Account during the preceding calendar year. During the six months ended June 30, 2013 the Company issued 13,613 new shares of common stock, which were distributed to directors of the Company in full settlement of shares credited as of December 31, 2012.
|
14 Sale of Vessels
On February 13, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Independence. The gross sale consideration was $7.0 million. The Company realized a net gain on this sale of $518 thousand and net sale proceeds of $6.0 million. The Independence was 26 years old.
On February 28, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Henry. The gross sale consideration was $6.1 million. The Company realized a net gain on this sale of $138 thousand and net sale proceeds of $5.37 million. The Henry was 27 years old.
On March 25, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Pride. The gross sale consideration was $6.5 million. The Company realized a net loss on this sale of $671 thousand and net sale proceeds of $5.48 million. The Pride was 25 years old.
On May 14, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Honour. The gross sale consideration was $9.1 million. The Company realized a net gain on this sale of $112 thousand and net sale proceeds of $8.0 million. The Honour was 24 years old.
On June 13, 2013, the Company sold and delivered the Elbe. The gross sale consideration was $5.6 million. The Company realized a net gain on this sale of $59 thousand and net sale proceeds of $5.02 million. The Elbe was 22 years old.
|
15 Subsequent Events
As of July 11, 2013, the Company signed an amended and restated agreement (effective as of June 30, 2013) with Citibank, ABN Amro, CEXIM and Sinosure, in relation to its $203.4 million credit facility, which aligns its financial covenants, as applicable, with the Company’s Bank Agreement and continues to require the Company to maintain a minimum ratio of the market value of the vessel collateralizing a tranche of the facility to debt outstanding under such tranche of 125% (as described in Note 9, Long-term Debt, to our condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited) included elsewhere herein).
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income
In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance for reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendment requires an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods presented, including interim periods. The amended guidance was effective for the Company for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of the new guidance did not have an effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
|
As of June 30, 2013, Danaos included the vessel owning companies (the “Danaos Subsidiaries”) listed below. All vessels are container vessels:
Company |
|
Date of Incorporation |
|
Vessel Name |
|
Year |
|
TEU |
|
Seacaravel Shipping Ltd. |
|
June 11, 1996 |
|
Hope |
|
1989 |
|
3,908 |
|
Appleton Navigation S.A. |
|
May 12, 1998 |
|
Komodo |
|
1991 |
|
2,917 |
|
Geoffrey Shipholding Ltd. |
|
September 22, 1997 |
|
Kalamata |
|
1991 |
|
2,917 |
|
Victory Shipholding Inc. |
|
October 9, 2002 |
|
Lotus |
|
1988 |
|
3,098 |
|
Duke Marine Inc. |
|
April 14, 2003 |
|
Hyundai Duke |
|
1992 |
|
4,651 |
|
Commodore Marine Inc. |
|
April 14, 2003 |
|
Commodore |
|
1992 |
|
4,651 |
|
Containers Services Inc. |
|
May 30, 2002 |
|
Deva |
|
2004 |
|
4,253 |
|
Containers Lines Inc. |
|
May 30, 2002 |
|
Derby D |
|
2004 |
|
4,253 |
|
Oceanew Shipping Ltd. |
|
January 14, 2002 |
|
CSCL Europe |
|
2004 |
|
8,468 |
|
Oceanprize Navigation Ltd. |
|
January 21, 2003 |
|
CSCL America |
|
2004 |
|
8,468 |
|
Federal Marine Inc. |
|
February 14, 2006 |
|
Hyundai Federal |
|
1994 |
|
4,651 |
|
Karlita Shipping Co. Ltd. |
|
February 27, 2003 |
|
CSCL Pusan |
|
2006 |
|
9,580 |
|
Ramona Marine Co. Ltd. |
|
February 27, 2003 |
|
CSCL Le Havre |
|
2006 |
|
9,580 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 6) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
Marathonas |
|
1991 |
|
4,814 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 7) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
Messologi |
|
1991 |
|
4,814 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 8) Corp. |
|
November 16, 2006 |
|
Mytilini |
|
1991 |
|
4,814 |
|
Auckland Marine Inc. |
|
January 27, 2005 |
|
SNL Colombo |
|
2004 |
|
4,300 |
|
Seacarriers Services Inc. |
|
June 28, 2005 |
|
YM Seattle |
|
2007 |
|
4,253 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Vladivostok |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Advance |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Stride |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Future |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
June 28, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Sprinter |
|
1997 |
|
2,200 |
|
Wellington Marine Inc. |
|
January 27, 2005 |
|
YM Singapore |
|
2004 |
|
4,300 |
|
Seacarriers Lines Inc. |
|
June 28, 2005 |
|
YM Vancouver |
|
2007 |
|
4,253 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 7) Corp. |
|
December 6, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Highway |
|
1998 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 6) Corp. |
|
December 6, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Progress |
|
1998 |
|
2,200 |
|
Speedcarrier (No. 8) Corp. |
|
December 6, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Bridge |
|
1998 |
|
2,200 |
|
Trindade Maritime Company |
|
April 10, 2013 |
|
Amalia C |
|
1998 |
|
2,452 |
|
Vilos Navigation Company Ltd. |
|
May 30, 2013 |
|
Niledutch Zebra |
|
2001 |
|
2,602 |
|
Bayview Shipping Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Rio Grande |
|
2008 |
|
4,253 |
|
Channelview Marine Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Sao Paolo |
|
2008 |
|
4,253 |
|
Balticsea Marine Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Kingston |
|
2008 |
|
4,253 |
|
Continent Marine Inc. |
|
March 22, 2006 |
|
Zim Monaco |
|
2009 |
|
4,253 |
|
Medsea Marine Inc. |
|
May 8, 2006 |
|
Zim Dalian |
|
2009 |
|
4,253 |
|
Blacksea Marine Inc. |
|
May 8, 2006 |
|
Zim Luanda |
|
2009 |
|
4,253 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Moliere(1) |
|
2009 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Musset(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Nerval(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Rabelais(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Boxcarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
June 27, 2006 |
|
CMA CGM Racine(1) |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Expresscarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
March 5, 2007 |
|
YM Mandate |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
Expresscarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
March 5, 2007 |
|
YM Maturity |
|
2010 |
|
6,500 |
|
CellContainer (No. 1) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Buenos Aires |
|
2010 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 2) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Santos |
|
2010 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 3) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Versailles |
|
2010 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 4) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Algeciras |
|
2011 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 5) Corp. |
|
March 23, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Constantza |
|
2011 |
|
3,400 |
|
CellContainer (No. 6) Corp. |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Germany |
|
2011 |
|
10,100 |
|
CellContainer (No. 7) Corp. |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Italy |
|
2011 |
|
10,100 |
|
CellContainer (No. 8) Corp. |
|
October 31, 2007 |
|
Hanjin Greece |
|
2011 |
|
10,100 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Attila |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Tancredi |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Bianca |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
January 31, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Samson |
|
2011 |
|
8,530 |
|
Teucarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
September 17, 2007 |
|
CMA CGM Melisande |
|
2012 |
|
8,530 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 1) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Together |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 2) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Tenacity |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 3) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Smart |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 4) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Speed |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
Megacarrier (No. 5) Corp. |
|
September 10, 2007 |
|
Hyundai Ambition |
|
2012 |
|
13,100 |
|
(1) Vessel subject to charterer’s option to purchase vessel after first eight years of time charter term for $78.0 million.
|
Restricted cash is comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Retention account |
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
$ |
2,821 |
|
Restricted deposits |
|
16,026 |
|
430 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
18,841 |
|
$ |
3,251 |
|
Fixed assets consist of vessels. Vessels’ cost, accumulated depreciation and changes thereto were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Vessel |
|
Accumulated |
|
Net Book |
| |||
As of January 1, 2012 |
|
$ |
3,703,781 |
|
$ |
(461,830 |
) |
$ |
3,241,951 |
|
Additions |
|
1,022,560 |
|
(143,938 |
) |
878,622 |
| |||
Disposal |
|
(20,606 |
) |
15,801 |
|
(4,805 |
) | |||
Impairment loss |
|
(129,630 |
) |
— |
|
(129,630 |
) | |||
As of December 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
4,576,105 |
|
$ |
(589,967 |
) |
$ |
3,986,138 |
|
Additions |
|
17,757 |
|
(68,147 |
) |
(50,390 |
) | |||
Disposal |
|
(92,123 |
) |
62,806 |
|
(29,317 |
) | |||
As of June 30, 2013 |
|
$ |
4,501,739 |
|
$ |
(595,308 |
) |
$ |
3,906,431 |
|
|
Deferred charges, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
Drydocking and |
|
Finance |
|
Total |
| |||
As of January 1, 2012 |
|
$ |
6,431 |
|
$ |
93,280 |
|
$ |
99,711 |
|
Additions |
|
9,308 |
|
186 |
|
9,494 |
| |||
Amortization |
|
(6,070 |
) |
(14,314 |
) |
(20,384 |
) | |||
As of December 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
9,669 |
|
$ |
79,152 |
|
$ |
88,821 |
|
Additions |
|
422 |
|
43 |
|
465 |
| |||
Written off amounts |
|
(402 |
) |
— |
|
(402 |
) | |||
Amortization |
|
(3,179 |
) |
(7,754 |
) |
(10,933 |
) | |||
As of June 30, 2013 |
|
$ |
6,510 |
|
$ |
71,441 |
|
$ |
77,951 |
|
Other non-current assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Fair value of swaps |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
Notes receivable from ZIM |
|
34,821 |
|
33,899 |
| ||
Other non-current assets |
|
1,031 |
|
1,176 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
40,176 |
|
$ |
37,983 |
|
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Accrued payroll |
|
$ |
1,241 |
|
$ |
969 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
12,421 |
|
12,473 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
19,472 |
|
19,452 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
Other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Fair value of swaps |
|
$ |
120,881 |
|
$ |
130,100 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
365 |
|
365 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
121,246 |
|
$ |
130,465 |
|
Other long-term liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
As of June 30, |
|
As of December 31, |
| ||
Fair value of swaps |
|
$ |
112,279 |
|
$ |
176,948 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
12,145 |
|
10,315 |
| ||
Total |
|
$ |
124,424 |
|
$ |
187,263 |
|
|
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
Lender |
|
As of |
|
Current |
|
Long-term |
|
As of |
|
Current |
|
Long-term |
| ||||||
The Royal Bank of Scotland |
|
$ |
686,597 |
|
$ |
4,934 |
|
$ |
681,663 |
|
$ |
686,800 |
|
$ |
3,771 |
|
$ |
683,029 |
|
HSH Nordbank |
|
33,280 |
|
4,774 |
|
28,506 |
|
35,000 |
|
6,123 |
|
28,877 |
| ||||||
The Export-Import Bank of Korea (“KEXIM”) |
|
34,126 |
|
10,369 |
|
23,757 |
|
39,311 |
|
10,369 |
|
28,942 |
| ||||||
The Export-Import Bank of Korea & ABN Amro |
|
73,734 |
|
11,250 |
|
62,484 |
|
79,359 |
|
11,250 |
|
68,109 |
| ||||||
Deutsche Bank |
|
179,064 |
|
2,119 |
|
176,945 |
|
180,000 |
|
2,406 |
|
177,594 |
| ||||||
Credit Agricole |
|
154,664 |
|
7,122 |
|
147,542 |
|
156,800 |
|
6,279 |
|
150,521 |
| ||||||
HSH Nordbank AG-Aegean Baltic Bank-Piraeus Bank |
|
658,160 |
|
4,092 |
|
654,068 |
|
658,160 |
|
— |
|
658,160 |
| ||||||
Credit Suisse |
|
219,347 |
|
7,779 |
|
211,568 |
|
221,100 |
|
6,076 |
|
215,024 |
| ||||||
ABN Amro-Lloyds TSB-National Bank of Greece |
|
250,806 |
|
8,245 |
|
242,561 |
|
253,200 |
|
6,966 |
|
246,234 |
| ||||||
Commerzbank-Credit Suisse- Credit Agricole |
|
295,285 |
|
14,097 |
|
281,188 |
|
298,500 |
|
11,401 |
|
287,099 |
| ||||||
The Royal Bank of Scotland (New Credit Facility) |
|
98,160 |
|
8,246 |
|
89,914 |
|
100,000 |
|
6,069 |
|
93,931 |
| ||||||
HSH Nordbank AG-Aegean Baltic Bank-Piraeus Bank (New Credit Facility) |
|
117,250 |
|
20,417 |
|
96,833 |
|
123,750 |
|
17,727 |
|
106,023 |
| ||||||
ABN Amro-Lloyds TSB-National Bank of Greece (New Credit Facility) |
|
34,588 |
|
5,281 |
|
29,307 |
|
37,100 |
|
5,438 |
|
31,662 |
| ||||||
Sinosure CEXIM-Citi-ABN Amro Credit Facility |
|
172,890 |
|
20,340 |
|
152,550 |
|
183,060 |
|
20,340 |
|
162,720 |
| ||||||
Club Facility (New Credit Facility) |
|
83,900 |
|
12,013 |
|
71,887 |
|
83,900 |
|
6,180 |
|
77,720 |
| ||||||
Citi—Eurobank Credit Facility |
|
77,212 |
|
4,863 |
|
72,349 |
|
80,000 |
|
4,681 |
|
75,319 |
| ||||||
Comprehensive Financing Plan exit fee accrued |
|
6,236 |
|
— |
|
6,236 |
|
4,354 |
|
— |
|
4,354 |
| ||||||
Fair value hedged debt |
|
1,869 |
|
— |
|
1,869 |
|
2,154 |
|
— |
|
2,154 |
| ||||||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
3,177,168 |
|
$ |
145,941 |
|
$ |
3,031,227 |
|
$ |
3,222,548 |
|
$ |
125,076 |
|
$ |
3,097,472 |
|
Hyundai Samho Vendor Financing |
|
$ |
150,448 |
|
$ |
57,388 |
|
$ |
93,060 |
|
$ |
179,142 |
|
$ |
57,388 |
|
$ |
121,754 |
Maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter subsequent to June 30, 2013, are as follows (in thousands):
Payment due by period ended |
|
Fixed |
|
Variable |
|
Final Payment |
|
Total |
| ||||
June 30, 2014 |
|
$ |
129,273 |
|
$ |
16,668 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
145,941 |
|
June 30, 2015 |
|
142,862 |
|
15,835 |
|
— |
|
158,697 |
| ||||
June 30, 2016 |
|
168,810 |
|
81,895 |
|
— |
|
250,705 |
| ||||
June 30, 2017 |
|
192,367 |
|
186,607 |
|
— |
|
378,974 |
| ||||
June 30, 2018 |
|
169,336 |
|
175,275 |
|
— |
|
344,611 |
| ||||
June 30, 2019 and thereafter |
|
244,376 |
|
34,900 |
|
1,610,859 |
|
1,890,135 |
| ||||
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
1,047,024 |
|
$ |
511,180 |
|
$ |
1,610,859 |
|
$ |
3,169,063 |
|
* The last payment due on December 31, 2018, includes the unamortized remaining principal debt balances under the restructuring agreement, as such amount will be determinable following the fixed and variable amortization.
|
|
February 15, |
|
May 15, |
|
August 15, |
|
November 15, |
|
December 31, |
|
Total |
|
2013 |
|
— |
|
19,481,395 |
|
21,167,103 |
|
21,482,169 |
|
— |
|
62,130,667 |
|
2014 |
|
22,722,970 |
|
21,942,530 |
|
22,490,232 |
|
24,654,040 |
|
— |
|
91,809,772 |
|
2015 |
|
26,736,647 |
|
27,021,750 |
|
25,541,180 |
|
34,059,102 |
|
— |
|
113,358,679 |
|
2016 |
|
30,972,971 |
|
36,278,082 |
|
32,275,598 |
|
43,852,513 |
|
— |
|
143,379,164 |
|
2017 |
|
44,938,592 |
|
36,690,791 |
|
35,338,304 |
|
31,872,109 |
|
— |
|
148,839,796 |
|
2018 |
|
34,152,011 |
|
37,585,306 |
|
44,398,658 |
|
45,333,618 |
|
65,969,274 |
|
227,438,867 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
786,956,945 |
|
* The Company may elect to make the scheduled payments shown in the above table three months earlier.
Maturities of Hyundai Samho vendor financing for the next periods subsequent to June 30, 2013, are as follows (in thousands):
Payment due by period ended |
|
|
| |
June 30, 2014 |
|
$ |
57,388 |
|
June 30, 2015 |
|
57,388 |
| |
June 30, 2016 |
|
35,672 |
| |
Total vendor financing |
|
$ |
150,448 |
Lender |
|
Outstanding |
|
Collateral Vessels |
| |
The Royal Bank of Scotland(2) |
|
$ |
686.6 |
|
The Hyundai Progress, the Hyundai Highway, the Hyundai Bridge, the Hyundai Federal (ex APL Federal), the Zim Monaco, the Hanjin Buenos Aires, the Hanjin Versailles, the Hanjin Algeciras, the CMA CGM Racine and the CMA CGM Melisande |
|
Aegean Baltic Bank—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank(3) |
|
$ |
658.2 |
|
The Kalamata, the Komodo, the Commodore (ex Hyundai Commodore), the Hyundai Duke (ex APL Duke), the Marathonas, the Messologi, the Mytilini, the Hope, the Lotus, the Hyundai Vladivostok, the Hyundai Advance, the Hyundai Stride, the Hyundai Future, the Hyundai Sprinter, the Amalia C and the Niledutch Zebra |
|
Credit Agricole |
|
$ |
154.7 |
|
The CMA CGM Moliere and the CMA CGM Musset |
|
Deutsche Bank |
|
$ |
179.1 |
|
The Zim Rio Grande, the Zim Sao Paolo and the Zim Kingston |
|
Credit Suisse |
|
$ |
219.3 |
|
The Zim Luanda, the CMA CGM Nerval and the YM Mandate |
|
ABN Amro—Lloyds TSB—National Bank of Greece |
|
$ |
250.8 |
|
The YM Colombo (ex SNL Colombo), the YM Seattle, the YM Vancouver and the YM Singapore |
|
Commerzbank—Credit Suisse—Credit Agricole |
|
$ |
295.3 |
|
The ZIM Dalian, the Hanjin Santos, the YM Maturity, the Hanjin Constantza and the CMA CGM Attila |
|
HSH Nordbank |
|
$ |
33.3 |
|
The Deva and the Derby D |
|
KEXIM |
|
$ |
34.1 |
|
The CSCL Europe and the CSCL America |
|
KEXIM-ABN Amro |
|
$ |
73.7 |
|
The CSCL Pusan and the CSCL Le Havre |
|
Aegean Baltic—HSH Nordbank—Piraeus Bank(3) |
|
$ |
117.2 |
|
The Hyundai Speed, the Hanjin Italy and the CMA CGM Rabelais |
|
RBS(2) |
|
$ |
98.2 |
|
The Hyundai Smart and the Hanjin Germany |
|
ABN Amro Club Facility |
|
$ |
34.6 |
|
The Hanjin Greece |
|
Club Facility |
|
$ |
83.9 |
|
The Hyundai Together and the Hyundai Tenacity |
|
Citi-Eurobank |
|
$ |
77.2 |
|
The Hyundai Ambition |
|
Sinosure-CEXIM |
|
$ |
172.9 |
|
The CMA CGM Tancredi, the CMA CGM Bianca and the CMA CGM Samson |
|
Vendor Financing |
| |||||
Hyundai Samho |
|
$ |
150.4 |
|
Second priority liens on the Hyundai Smart, the Hyundai Speed, the Hyundai Ambition, the Hyundai Together, the Hyundai Tenacity, the Hanjin Greece, the Hanjin Italy and the Hanjin Germany |
|
(1) As of June 30, 2013.
(2) Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Derby D, the CSCL America and the CSCL Le Havre.
(3) Pursuant to the Bank Agreement, this credit facility is also secured by a second priority lien on the Deva, the CSCL Europe and the CSCL Pusan.
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2013 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
4,324 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
233,160 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
233,160 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
|
$ |
307,048 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
307,048 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2013 |
|
As of December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
|
Book Value |
|
Fair Value |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
75,034 |
|
$ |
75,034 |
|
$ |
55,628 |
|
$ |
55,628 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
$ |
18,841 |
|
$ |
18,841 |
|
$ |
3,251 |
|
$ |
3,251 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
10,669 |
|
$ |
10,669 |
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
$ |
3,741 |
|
Due from related parties |
|
$ |
8,052 |
|
$ |
8,052 |
|
$ |
12,664 |
|
$ |
12,664 |
|
Notes receivable from ZIM |
|
$ |
34,821 |
|
$ |
34,503 |
|
$ |
33,899 |
|
$ |
34,071 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
12,573 |
|
$ |
12,573 |
|
$ |
13,982 |
|
$ |
13,982 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
Long-term debt, including current portion |
|
$ |
3,177,168 |
|
$ |
3,178,764 |
|
$ |
3,222,548 |
|
$ |
3,223,337 |
|
Vendor financing, including current portion |
|
$ |
150,448 |
|
$ |
149,651 |
|
$ |
179,142 |
|
$ |
179,500 |
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of June 30, 2013 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $ ) |
| ||||||||||
Notes receivable from ZIM(1) |
|
$ |
34,503 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
34,503 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Long-term debt, including current portion(2) |
|
$ |
3,178,764 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
$3,178,764 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Vendor financing, including current portion(3) |
|
$ |
149,651 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
149,651 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Accrued liabilities(4) |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
33,134 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2012 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
(Level I) |
|
(Level II) |
|
(Level III) |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands of $) |
| ||||||||||
Notes receivable from ZIM(1) |
|
$ |
34,071 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
34,071 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Long-term debt, including current portion(2) |
|
$ |
3,223,337 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
3,223,337 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Vendor financing, including current portion(3) |
|
$ |
179,500 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
179,500 |
|
$ |
— |
|
Accrued liabilities(4) |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
$ |
— |
|
$ |
32,894 |
|
$ |
— |
|
(1) The fair value is estimated based on currently available information on the Company’s counterparty, other contracts with similar terms, remaining maturities and interest rates.
(2) The fair value of the Company’s debt is estimated based on currently available debt with similar contract terms, interest rate and remaining maturities, as well as taking into account our creditworthiness.
(3) The fair value of the Company’s Vendor financing is estimated based on currently available financing with similar contract terms, interest rate and remaining maturities, as well as taking into account our creditworthiness.
(4) The fair value of the Company’s accrued liabilities, which mainly consists of accrued interest on our credit facilities and accrued realized losses on our cash flow interest rate swaps, is estimated based on currently available debt and swap agreements with similar contract terms, interest rates and remaining maturities, as well as taking into account our creditworthiness.
The interest rate swap agreements converting floating interest rate exposure into fixed were as follows (in thousands):
Counter-party |
|
Contract |
|
Effective |
|
Termination |
|
Notional |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Floating Rate |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
| |||
RBS |
|
03/09/2007 |
|
3/15/2010 |
|
3/15/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
5.07 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
$ |
(16,003 |
) |
$ |
(20,759 |
) |
RBS |
|
03/16/2007 |
|
3/20/2009 |
|
3/20/2014 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.922 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(6,716 |
) |
(11,253 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/28/2006 |
|
11/28/2008 |
|
11/28/2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.855 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(1,925 |
) |
(4,172 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/28/2006 |
|
11/28/2008 |
|
11/28/2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.875 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(1,934 |
) |
(4,190 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
12/01/2006 |
|
11/28/2008 |
|
11/28/2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.78 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(1,894 |
) |
(4,103 |
) | ||
HSH Nordbank |
|
12/06/2006 |
|
12/8/2009 |
|
12/8/2014 |
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
4.855 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(25,866 |
) |
(34,952 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
04/17/2007 |
|
4/17/2008 |
|
4/17/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
5.124 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(16,919 |
) |
(21,792 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
04/20/2007 |
|
4/20/2010 |
|
4/20/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
5.1775 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(17,186 |
) |
(22,116 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
09/13/2007 |
|
9/15/2009 |
|
9/15/2014 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.9775 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(11,284 |
) |
(15,882 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/16/2007 |
|
11/22/2010 |
|
11/22/2015 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
5.07 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(10,839 |
) |
(13,424 |
) | ||
RBS |
|
11/15/2007 |
|
11/19/2010 |
|
11/19/2015 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
5.12 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(10,920 |
) |
(13,523 |
) | ||
Eurobank |
|
12/06/2007 |
|
12/10/2010 |
|
12/10/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.8125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(21,054 |
) |
(25,725 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
10/23/2007 |
|
10/25/2009 |
|
10/27/2014 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
4.9975 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(15,437 |
) |
(21,241 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
11/02/2007 |
|
11/6/2010 |
|
11/6/2015 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
5.1 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(26,749 |
) |
(33,273 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
11/26/2007 |
|
11/29/2010 |
|
11/30/2015 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
4.98 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(10,658 |
) |
(13,243 |
) | ||
CITI |
|
02/07/2008 |
|
2/11/2011 |
|
2/11/2016 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.695 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(21,234 |
) |
(26,357 |
) | ||
Eurobank |
|
02/11/2008 |
|
5/31/2011 |
|
5/31/2015 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
4.755 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
(16,542 |
) |
(21,043 |
) | ||
Fair value of swap liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(233,160 |
) |
$ |
(307,048 |
) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
ABN Amro |
|
06/6/2013 |
|
1/4/2016 |
|
12/31/2016 |
|
$ |
325,000 |
|
1.4975 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
1,124 |
|
— |
| ||
ABN Amro |
|
06/4/2013 |
|
1/4/2016 |
|
12/31/2016 |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
1.4125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA |
|
1,074 |
|
— |
| ||
Fair value of swap assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,198 |
|
$ |
— |
|
|
Three months |
|
Three months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Total realized losses |
|
$ |
(36.6 |
) |
$ |
(40.4 |
) |
Realized losses deferred in Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
— |
|
2.2 |
| ||
Realized losses expensed in condensed consolidated Statements of Income |
|
(36.6 |
) |
(38.2 |
) | ||
Amortization of deferred realized losses |
|
(1.0 |
) |
(0.8 |
) | ||
Unrealized gains |
|
12.6 |
|
1.3 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized losses on cash flow interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(25.0 |
) |
$ |
(37.7 |
) |
|
|
Six months |
|
Six months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Total realized losses |
|
$ |
(72.5 |
) |
$ |
(80.4 |
) |
Realized losses deferred in Other Comprehensive Loss |
|
— |
|
7.0 |
| ||
Realized losses expensed in condensed consolidated Statements of Income |
|
(72.5 |
) |
(73.4 |
) | ||
Amortization of deferred realized losses |
|
(2.0 |
) |
(1.5 |
) | ||
Unrealized gains |
|
17.2 |
|
4.0 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized losses on cash flow interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(57.3 |
) |
$ |
(70.9 |
) |
The interest rate swap agreements converting fixed interest rate exposure into floating were as follows (in thousands):
Counter party |
|
Contract |
|
Effective |
|
Termination |
|
Notional |
|
Fixed Rate |
|
Floating Rate |
|
Fair Value |
|
Fair Value |
| |||
RBS |
|
11/15/2004 |
|
12/15/2004 |
|
8/27/2016 |
|
$ |
60,528 |
|
5.0125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA + 0.835 |
% p.a. |
$ |
1,012 |
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
RBS |
|
11/15/2004 |
|
11/17/2004 |
|
11/2/2016 |
|
$ |
62,342 |
|
5.0125 |
% p.a. |
USD LIBOR 3M BBA + 0.855 |
% p.a. |
1,114 |
|
1,518 |
| ||
Total fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,126 |
|
$ |
2,908 |
|
|
|
Three months |
|
Three months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Unrealized losses on swap asset |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
$ |
(0.2 |
) |
Unrealized gains on fair value of hedged debt |
|
— |
|
0.3 |
| ||
Amortization of fair value of hedged debt |
|
0.1 |
|
0.2 |
| ||
Realized gains |
|
0.4 |
|
0.4 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized gains on fair value interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
|
Six months |
|
Six months |
| ||
|
|
(in millions) |
| ||||
Unrealized losses on swap asset |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
Unrealized gains on fair value of hedged debt |
|
— |
|
0.6 |
| ||
Amortization of fair value of hedged debt |
|
0.3 |
|
0.3 |
| ||
Realized gains |
|
0.7 |
|
0.9 |
| ||
Unrealized and realized gains on fair value interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|