| Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Accounting Policies
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the cash flows for the same nine-month periods, and the financial position at September 30, 2012, and except as otherwise discussed such adjustments consist of only those of a normal recurring nature. The interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year and do not contain information included in the company’s annual condensed consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2011. Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC’s rules and regulations dealing with interim financial statements. However, the company believes that the disclosures made in the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K.
All dollar amounts, except share and per share amounts, are in millions of dollars throughout the tables included in these notes unless otherwise indicated.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current presentation.
Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements: During the third quarter of 2012 the company identified errors related to its deferred tax liability and goodwill accounts that originated in connection with certain acquisitions five to eleven years ago, resulting in an understatement of these accounts, and a cumulative overstatement of income tax expense of $18.6 million through June 30, 2012. In addition, the company had previously identified an error related to the overstatement of inventory ($2.9 million in 2011 and $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2012) that had been corrected as an out-of-period adjustment in the second quarter of 2012. The company does not believe these errors to be material to the company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flows for any of the company’s previously filed annual or quarterly financial statements. The company has revised the condensed consolidated financial statements included herein to correct for these errors. These revisions, including those previously disclosed in the company’s Annual report on Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2011, impacted the condensed consolidated financial statements as follows:
(a) Increase to cost of sales and decrease to earnings (loss) from continuing operations before taxes on earnings of $0.4 million and $1.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively.
(b) Decrease to provision for taxes on income of: $0.4 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively, and decrease to net earnings of $0.1 million for the nine months ended, September 30, 2011.
(c) At December 31, 2011: Decrease to inventories net of $2.9 million; increase to goodwill of $64.9 million; increase to other non-current assets of $4.0 million; increase to total assets of $66.0 million; decrease to accounts payable and accrued expenses of $1.1 million; increase to deferred income taxes of $50.9 million; and increase to total equity of $16.2 million.
|
|
2. Discontinued Operations
On January 14, 2011, the company closed the previously announced divestiture of its Kysor/Warren and Kysor/Warren de Mexico (collectively “Kysor/Warren”) businesses, which manufacture frozen, medium temperature and heated display merchandisers, mechanical refrigeration systems and remote mechanical and electrical houses to Lennox International for approximately $145 million, including a preliminary working capital adjustment. The transaction resulted in a $34.6 million loss on sale, primarily consisting of $29.9 million of income tax expense. The net proceeds from the sale were used to pay down outstanding term debt. On July 1, 2011, the company made a payment to Lennox International of $2.4 million as the final working capital adjustment under the sale agreement. The results of these operations have been classified as discontinued operations.
The following selected financial data of the Kysor/Warren businesses, primarily consisting of administrative costs, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, is presented for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect what the results of operations would have been had the businesses operated as a stand-alone entity. There was no general corporate expense or interest expense allocated to discontinued operations for this business during the periods presented.
The following selected financial data of various other businesses disposed of prior to 2012, primarily consisting of administrative costs, for the three and nine-months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, is presented for informational purposes only and does not necessarily reflect what the results of operations would have been had the businesses operated as a stand-alone entity. There was no general corporate expense or interest expense allocated to discontinued operations for these businesses during the periods presented.
|
|
3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The following tables set forth the company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The fair value of the company’s 7.125% Senior Notes due 2013 was approximately $150.8 million and $146.6 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The fair value of the company’s 9.50% Senior Notes due 2018 was approximately $449.0 million and $434.0 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The fair value of the company’s 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 was approximately $672.8 million and $634.9 million at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The fair values of the company’s Term Loans under its Senior Credit Facility were as follows at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively: Term Loan A — $304.3 million and $318.6 million; and Term Loan B — $333.9 million and $324.1 million. See Note 8, “Debt,” for a description of the debt instruments and their related carrying values.
ASC Topic 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820-10 classifies the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:
The company endeavors to utilize the best available information in measuring fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The company estimates fair value of its Term Loans and Senior Notes based on quoted market prices of the instruments; though these markets are typically thinly traded, the liabilities are therefore classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, deferred purchase price notes on receivables sold (See Note 9, “Accounts Receivable Securitization”) and short-term variable debt, including any amounts outstanding under our revolving credit facility, approximate fair value, without being discounted as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 due to the short-term nature of these instruments.
As a result of its global operating and financing activities, the company is exposed to market risks from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and commodity prices, which may adversely affect the company’s operating results and financial position. When deemed appropriate, the company minimizes these risks through the use of derivative financial instruments. Derivative financial instruments are used to manage risk and are not used for trading or other speculative purposes, and the company does not use leveraged derivative financial instruments. The forward foreign currency exchange and interest rate swap and cap contracts and commodity contracts are valued using broker quotations. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within Level 2.
|
|
4. Derivative Financial Instruments
The company’s risk management objective is to ensure that business exposures to risk that have been identified and measured and are capable of being controlled are minimized using the most effective and efficient methods to eliminate, reduce, or transfer such exposures. Operating decisions consider associated risks and structure transactions to manage risk whenever possible.
Use of derivative instruments is consistent with the overall business and risk management objectives of the company. Derivative instruments may be used to manage business risk within limits specified by the company’s risk policy and manage exposures that have been identified through the risk identification and measurement process, provided that they clearly qualify as “hedging” activities as defined in the risk policy. Use of derivative instruments is not automatic, nor is it necessarily the only response to managing pertinent business risk. Use is permitted only after the risks that have been identified are determined to exceed defined tolerance levels and are considered to be unavoidable.
The primary risks managed by the company by using derivative instruments are interest rate risk, commodity price risk and foreign currency exchange risk. Interest rate swap and cap instruments are entered into to manage interest rate or fair value risk. Swap contracts on various commodities are entered into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of materials used in the company’s manufacturing process. The company also enters into various foreign currency derivative instruments to manage foreign currency risk associated with the company’s projected foreign currency denominated purchases, sales, and receivable and payable balances.
ASC Topic 815-10, “Derivatives and Hedging,” requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the statement of financial position. In accordance with ASC Topic 815-10, the company designates commodity swaps, foreign currency exchange contracts, and interest rate derivative contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted purchases of commodities and currencies, and fixed or variable rate interest payments. Also in accordance with ASC Topic 815-10, the company designates fixed-to-float interest rate swaps as fair market value hedges of fixed rate debt, which synthetically swap the company’s fixed rate debt to floating rate debt.
For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of Other Comprehensive Income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness, are recognized in current earnings. In the next twelve months the company estimates $1.0 million of unrealized losses net of tax related to commodity price and currency exchange rate hedging will be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings. Foreign currency and commodity hedging is generally completed prospectively on a rolling basis for between twelve and twenty-four months, respectively, depending on the type of risk being hedged.
The risk management objective for the company’s fair market value interest rate hedges is to effectively change the amount of the underlying debt equal to the notional value of the hedges from a fixed to a floating interest rate based on the benchmark six-month U.S. LIBOR rate. These swaps include an embedded call feature to match the terms of the call schedule embedded in the Senior Notes. Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are expected to offset changes in the fair value of the debt due to changes in the U.S. six-month LIBOR benchmark interest rate.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the company had the following outstanding commodity and currency forward contracts that were entered into to hedge forecasted transactions:
As of June 30, 2011, the company offset, dedesignated and wrote-off all of its previous interest rate swaps against Term Loan A and B interest due to the amendment of its Senior Credit Facility (See Note 8, “Debt,” for a description of the Senior Credit Facility). As of September 30, 2012, the company had outstanding $350.0 million notional amount of 3.00% LIBOR caps related to the term loan portion of the Senior Credit Facility. The remaining unhedged portions of Term Loans A and B continue to bear interest according to the terms of the Senior Credit Facility.
In the third quarter of 2011, the company monetized the derivative asset related to the fixed-to-float interest rate swaps in connection with the 2018 and 2020 Notes and received $21.5 million. The gain was treated as an increase to the debt balances for each of the 2018 and 2020 Notes and will be amortized against interest expense over the life of the original swap. The company subsequently entered new interest rate swaps.
In the third quarter of 2012, the company further monetized the derivative asset related to certain portions of its fixed-to-float interest rate swaps related to its 2018 and 2020 Notes and received $14.8 million in the quarter. Consistent with the prior year monetization, the company treated the gain as an increase to the debt balances for each of the 2018 and 2020 notes, which will be amortized against interest expense over the life of the original swaps.
For derivative instruments that are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC Topic 815-10, the gains or losses on the derivatives are recognized in current earnings within cost of sales or other income, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the company had the following outstanding currency forward contracts that were not designated as hedging instruments:
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded as assets in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was as follows:
The fair value of outstanding derivative contracts recorded as liabilities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was as follows:
The effect of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 for gains or losses initially recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was as follows:
The effect of derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 for gains or losses initially recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet was as follows:
The effect of Fair Market Value designated derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 for gains or losses recognized through income was as follows:
The effect of Fair Market Value designated derivative instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 for gains or losses recognized through income was as follows:
|
|
5. Inventories
The components of inventories at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
|
|
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the year ended December 31, 2011, and the three months ended March 31, 2012, June 30, 2012, and September 30, 2012 are as follows:
The company accounts for goodwill and other intangible assets under the guidance of ASC Topic 350, “Intangibles — Goodwill and Other.” Under ASC Topic 350, goodwill is not amortized; however, the company performs an annual impairment review at June 30 of every year or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The company performs impairment reviews for its reporting units, which are Cranes Americas; Cranes Europe, Middle East, and Africa; Cranes China; Cranes Greater Asia Pacific; Crane Care; Foodservice Americas; Foodservice Europe, Middle East, and Africa; and Foodservice Asia, using a fair-value method based on the present value of future cash flows, which involves management’s judgments and assumptions about the amounts of those cash flows and the discount rates used. The estimated fair value is then compared with the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including recorded goodwill. Goodwill is then subject to risk of write-down to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the estimated fair value.
As of June 30, 2012, the company performed its annual impairment analysis relative to goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and based on those results no further impairment was indicated. The company will continue to monitor market conditions and determine if any additional interim reviews of goodwill, other intangibles or long-lived assets are warranted. In the event the company determines that assets are impaired in the future, the company would recognize a non-cash impairment charge, which could have a material adverse effect on the company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet and results of operations.
The gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and net book value of the company’s intangible assets other than goodwill at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:
Amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $9.5 million and $9.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was $28.6 million and $29.2 million, respectively. Amortization expense related to intangible assets for each of the five succeeding years is estimated to be approximately $40 million per year.
|
|
7. Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Accounts payable and accrued expenses at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are summarized as follows:
|
|
8. Debt
Outstanding debt at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:
The company’s Senior Credit Facility originally became effective November 6, 2008 and initially included four loan facilities — a revolving facility of $400.0 million with a five-year term, a Term Loan A of $1,025.0 million with a five-year term, a Term Loan B of $1,200.0 million with a six-year term, and a Term Loan X of $300.0 million with an eighteen-month term. The balance of Term Loan X was repaid in 2009. On May 13, 2011, the company amended and extended the maturities of its Senior Credit Facility by entering into a $1,250.0 million Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Senior Credit Facility”).
The Senior Credit Facility currently includes three different loan facilities. The first is a revolving facility in the amount of $500.0 million, with a term of five years. The second facility is an amortizing Term Loan A facility in the aggregate amount of $350.0 million with a term of five years. The third facility is an amortizing Term Loan B facility in the amount of $400.0 million with a term of 6.5 years. Including interest rate caps at September 30, 2012, the weighted average interest rates for the Term Loan A and the Term Loan B loans were 3.25% and 4.25%, respectively. Excluding interest rate caps, Term Loan A and Term Loan B interest rates were 3.25% and 4.25%, respectively, at September 30, 2012.
The Senior Credit Facility contains financial covenants including (a) a Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio, which measures the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and other adjustments (EBITDA), as defined in the credit agreement to (ii) consolidated cash interest expense, each for the most recent four fiscal quarters, and (b) a Consolidated Senior Secured Leverage Ratio, which measure the ratio of (i) consolidated senior secured indebtedness to (ii) consolidated EBITDA for the most recent four fiscal quarters. The current covenant levels of the financial covenants under the Senior Credit Facility are as set forth below:
The Senior Credit Facility includes customary representations and warranties and events of default and customary covenants, including without limitation (i) a requirement that the company prepay the term loan facilities from the net proceeds of asset sales, casualty losses, equity offerings, and new indebtedness for borrowed money, and from a portion of its excess cash flow, subject to certain exceptions; and (ii) limitations on indebtedness, capital expenditures, restricted payments, and acquisitions.
The company has three series of Senior Notes outstanding, including the 2013, 2018, and 2020 Notes (collectively the “Senior Notes”; see below for the description of the 2013, 2018 and 2020 Notes). Each series of Senior Notes is an unsecured senior obligation ranking subordinate to all existing senior secured indebtedness and equal to all existing senior unsecured obligations. Each series of Senior Notes is guaranteed by certain of the company’s 100% owned domestic subsidiaries; which subsidiaries also guaranty the company’s obligations under the Senior Credit Facility. Each series of Senior Notes contains affirmative and negative covenants which limit, among other things, the company’s ability to redeem or repurchase its debt, incur additional debt, make acquisitions, merge with other entities, pay dividends or distributions, repurchase capital stock, and create or become subject to liens. Each series of Senior Notes also includes customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing with respect to the Senior Notes, then the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the outstanding Senior Notes may declare the principal and accrued interest on all of the Senior Notes to be due and payable immediately. In addition, in the case of an event of default arising from certain events of bankruptcy, all unpaid principal of, and premium, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest on all outstanding Senior Notes will become due and payable immediately.
On September 30, 2012, the company had outstanding $150.0 million of 7.125% Senior Notes due 2013 (the “2013 Notes”). Interest on the 2013 Notes is payable semiannually in May and November each year. As of November 1, 2011, the company is permitted to redeem the 2013 Notes in whole or in part at any time with no prepayment premium. See Note 20, “Subsequent Events,” for information regarding the redemption of the 2013 Notes.
On February 8, 2010, the company completed the sale of $400.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 9.50% Senior Notes due 2018 (the “2018 Notes”). Net proceeds of $392.0 million from this offering were used to partially pay down ratably the then outstanding balances on Term Loan A and Term Loan B. Interest on the 2018 Notes is payable semiannually in February and August of each year. The 2018 Notes may be redeemed in whole or in part by the company for a premium at any time on or after February 15, 2014. The following would be the principal and the premium paid by the company, expressed as a percentage of the principal amount, if it redeems the 2018 Notes during the 12-month period commencing on February 15 of the year set forth below:
In addition, at any time, or from time to time, on or prior to February 15, 2013, the company may, at its option, use the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of the 2018 Notes outstanding at a redemption price of 109.5% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon, if any, to the date of redemption; provided that (1) at least 65% of the principal amount of the 2018 Notes outstanding remains outstanding immediately after any such redemption; and (2) the company makes such redemption not more than 90 days after the consummation of any such public offering.
On October 18, 2010, the company completed the sale of $600.0 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.50% Senior Notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes”). Net proceeds of $583.7 million from this offering were used to pay down ratably the then outstanding balances of Term Loans A and B. Interest on the 2020 Notes is payable semi-annually in May and November of each year. The company may redeem the 2020 Notes in whole or in part for a premium at any time on or after November 1, 2015. The following would be the principal and the premium paid by the company, expressed as a percentage of the principal amount, if it redeems the 2020 Notes during the 12-month period commencing on November 1 of the year set forth below:
In addition, at any time, or from time to time, on or prior to November 1, 2013, the company may, at its option, use the net cash proceeds of one or more public equity offerings to redeem up to 35% of the principal amount of the 2020 Notes outstanding at a redemption price of 108.5% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption; provided that (1) at least 65% of the principal amount of the 2020 Notes outstanding remains outstanding immediately after any such redemption; and (2) the company makes such redemption not more than 90 days after the consummation of any such public offering.
As of September 30, 2012, the company had outstanding $84.4 million of other indebtedness that has a weighted-average interest rate of approximately 6.5%. This debt includes outstanding overdraft balances and capital lease obligations in its Americas, Asia-Pacific and European regions.
As of June 30, 2011, the company offset, dedesignated and wrote-off all of its previous interest rate swaps against Term Loans A and B interest due to the amendment of its Senior Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2012, the company had outstanding $350.0 million notional amount of 3.00% LIBOR caps related to the term loan portion of the Senior Credit Facility. The remaining unhedged portions of Term Loans A and B continue to bear interest according to the terms of the Senior Credit Facility.
In the third quarter of 2011, the company monetized the derivative asset related to the fixed-to-float interest rate swaps in connection with the 2018 and 2020 Notes and received $21.5 million. The gain was treated as an increase to the debt balances for each of the 2018 and 2020 Notes and will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swap. The company subsequently entered new interest rate swaps.
In the third quarter of 2012, the company further monetized the derivative asset related to certain portions of its fixed-to-float interest rate swaps related to its 2018 and 2020 notes and received $14.8 million in the quarter. Consistent with the prior year monetization, the company treated the gain as an increase to the debt balances for each of the 2018 and 2020 notes, which will be amortized to interest expense over the life of the original swaps.
The balance sheet values of the 2018 and 2020 Notes at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are not equal to the face value of the Notes due to the fact that the monetized value and the fair market value of the fixed-to-float interest rate hedges on these Notes is included in the applicable balance sheet value (See Note 4, “Derivative Financial Instruments” for more information).
As of September 30, 2012, the company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants in its debt instruments inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the Senior Credit Facility, the 2013 Notes, the 2018 Notes, and the 2020 Notes. Based upon our current plans and outlook, we believe we will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent 12 months. As of September 30, 2012 our Consolidated Senior Secured Leverage Ratio was 2.83:1, while the maximum ratio is 3.50:1 and our Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio was 2.85:1, above the minimum ratio of 2.00:1.
|
|
9. Accounts Receivable Securitization
On September 26, 2012, the company entered into a Fourth Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement among Manitowoc Funding, LLC (“U.S. Seller”) and Manitowoc Cayman Islands Funding Ltd. (“Cayman Seller”), as sellers, the Company, Garland Commercial Ranges Limited (“Garland”), Convotherm Elektrogeräte GmbH (“Convotherm”), and the other persons from time to time party thereto, as servicers, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), as purchaser and agent (the “Fourth Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement”). Pursuant to this amendment, (i) the commitment size of this facility increased from up to $125 million to up to $150 million; (ii) Wells Fargo was added as purchaser and agent, replacing Hannover Funding Company, LLC, and Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale, respectively; (iii) the facility commitment was extended for a three-year period; and (iv) the company’s cost of funds decreased through the use of a LIBOR index rate plus a 1.45% fixed spread for three years (as opposed to using an underlying commercial paper rate, as was previously the case). Trade accounts receivables sold to a third-party financial institution (“Purchaser”) and being serviced by the company totaled $146.9 million at September 30, 2012 and $121.1 million at December 31, 2011.
Transactions under the accounts receivable securitization program are accounted for as sales in accordance with ASC Topic 860, “Transfers and Servicing.” Sales of trade receivables to the Purchaser are reflected as a reduction of accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and the proceeds received, including collections on the deferred purchase price notes, are included in cash flows from operating activities in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The company deems the interest rate risk related to the deferred purchase price notes to be de minimis, primarily due to the short average collection cycle of the related receivables (i.e., 60 days) as noted below.
Due to an average collection cycle of less than 60 days for such accounts receivable as well as the company’s collection history, the fair value of the company’s deferred purchase price notes approximates book value. The fair value of the deferred purchase price notes recorded at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $59.8 million and $40.3 million, respectively, and is included in accounts receivable in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The accounts receivable securitization program also contains customary affirmative and negative covenants. Among other restrictions, these covenants require the company to meet specified financial tests, which include a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated senior secured leverage ratio that are the same as the covenant ratios required per the Senior Credit Facility. As of September 30, 2012, the company was in compliance with all affirmative and negative covenants inclusive of the financial covenants pertaining to the accounts receivable securitization program. Based on our current plans and outlook, we believe we will be able to comply with these covenants during the subsequent 12 months.
|
|
10. Income Taxes
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the company recorded an income tax expense of $41.0 million, compared to an income tax expense of $13.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in the company’s tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 relative to the prior year resulted primarily from an increase in pre-tax earnings. The effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% due to results of foreign operations that are subject to income taxes at different statutory rates and certain jurisdictions where the company cannot recognize tax benefits on current losses.
The company’s unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were $55.6 million as of September 30, 2012, and $48.7 million as of September 30, 2011. All of the company’s unrecognized tax benefits as of September 30, 2012, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate. During the next twelve months, it is reasonably possible that federal, state and foreign tax audit resolutions could reduce unrecognized tax benefits and income tax expense by up to $16.0 million, either because the company’s tax positions are sustained on audit or settled, or the applicable statute of limitations closes.
The company is under examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for the calendar years 2008 and 2009. In August 2012, the company received a Notice of Proposed Assessment (“NOPA”) related to the disallowance of the deductibility of a $380.9 million foreign currency loss incurred in calendar year 2008. In September 2012, the company responded to the NOPA indicating its formal disagreement and subsequently received an Examination Report which includes the proposed disallowance. The largest potential adjustment for this matter could, if the IRS were to prevail, increase the company’s potential federal tax expense and cash outflow by approximately $134.0 million plus interest and penalties, if any. The company will file a formal protest to the proposed adjustment during the fourth quarter of 2012. The company plans to pursue all administrative and, if necessary, judicial remedies with respect to resolving this matter. However, there can be no assurance that this matter will be resolved in the company’s favor. The IRS also examined and proposed adjustments to the research and development credit generated in 2009; the company also formally disagreed with these adjustments.
The company regularly assesses the likelihood of an adverse outcome resulting from examinations to determine the adequacy of its tax reserves. As of September 30, 2012, the company believes that it is more-likely-than-not that the tax positions it has taken will be sustained upon the resolution of its audits resulting in no material impact on its consolidated financial position and the results of operations and cash flows. However, the final determination with respect to any tax audits, and any related litigation, could be materially different from the company’s estimates and/or from its historical income tax provisions and accruals and could have a material effect on operating results and/or cash flows in the periods for which that determination is made. In addition, future period earnings may be adversely impacted by litigation costs, settlements, penalties, and/or interest assessments.
As of September 30, 2012, there have been no significant developments in the quarter with respect to the company’s other ongoing tax audits in various jurisdictions.
|
|
12. Stockholders’ Equity
The following is a roll forward of retained earnings and noncontrolling interest for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
Authorized capitalization consists of 300 million shares of $0.01 par value common stock and 3.5 million shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock. None of the preferred shares have been issued.
Currently, the company has authorization to purchase up to 10 million shares of common stock at management’s discretion. As of September 30, 2012, the company has purchased approximately 7.6 million shares at a cost of $49.8 million pursuant to this authorization; however, the company has not purchased any shares of its common stock under this authorization since 2006.
|
|
13. Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense is calculated by estimating the fair value of incentive and non-qualified stock options at the time of grant and amortized over the stock options’ vesting period. Stock-based compensation expense was $3.2 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense was $11.8 million and $11.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The company granted options to acquire 0.7 million and 1.0 million shares of common stock to officers and employees during the first three quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively. The company does not currently grant options to directors; however, prior to 2011, any option grants to directors were exercisable immediately upon granting and expire ten years subsequent to the grant date. For all outstanding grants made to officers and employees prior to 2011, options become exercisable in 25% increments annually over a four-year period beginning on the second anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years subsequent to the grant date. Starting with 2011 grants, any options become exercisable in 25% increments annually over a four-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant date and expire ten years subsequent to the grant date. In addition, the company issued a total of 0.5 million and 0.8 million shares of restricted stock to directors, officers and employees during the first three quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively. The restrictions on all shares of restricted stock expire on the third anniversary of the applicable grant date.
Performance shares granted are earned based on the extent to which performance goals are met over the applicable performance period. The performance goals and the applicable performance period vary for each grant year. The performance shares granted in 2011 are earned based on the extent to which performance goals are met by the company over a two-year period from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012. The performance goals for the performance shares granted in 2011 are based fifty percent (50%) on 2012 EVA® results and fifty percent (50%) on debt reduction over the two-year period. Seventy-five percent (75%) of the shares earned by an employee will be paid out after the end of the two-year period and the remaining twenty-five percent (25%) of the shares earned are subject to the further requirement that the employee be continuously employed by the company during the entire 2013 calendar year. If that criterion is met then the twenty-five percent (25%) will be paid out to the employee after the end of the 2013 calendar year. The performance shares granted in 2012 are earned based on the extent which performance goals are met by the company over a three-year period from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. The performance goals for the performance shares granted in 2012 are based fifty percent (50%) on total shareholder return relative to a peer group of companies over the three-year period and fifty percent (50%) on improvement in the company’s total leverage ratio over the three-year period. Depending on the foregoing factors, the number of shares awarded could range from zero to 0.9 million and zero to 0.7 million for the 2011 and 2012 performance share grants, respectively.
The company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the stock-based awards’ vesting period.
|
|
14. Contingencies and Significant Estimates
As of September 30, 2012, the company held reserves for environmental matters related to Enodis locations of approximately $0.9 million. At certain of the company’s other facilities, the company has identified potential contaminants in soil and groundwater. The ultimate cost of any remediation required will depend upon the results of future investigation. Based upon available information, the company does not expect the ultimate costs at any of these locations will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows individually and in the aggregate.
The company believes that it has obtained and is in substantial compliance with those material environmental permits and approvals necessary to conduct its various businesses. Based on the facts presently known, the company does not expect environmental compliance costs to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
As of September 30, 2012, various product-related lawsuits were pending. To the extent permitted under applicable law, all of these are insured with self-insurance retention levels. The company’s self-insurance retention levels vary by business, and have fluctuated over the last five years. The range of the company’s self-insured retention levels is $0.1 million to $3.0 million per occurrence. The high-end of the company’s self-insurance retention level is a legacy product liability insurance program inherited in the Grove acquisition for cranes manufactured in the United States for occurrences from January 2000 through October 2002. As of September 30, 2012, the largest self-insured retention level for new occurrences currently maintained by the company is $2.0 million per occurrence and applies to product liability claims for cranes manufactured in the United States.
Product liability reserves in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2012 were $28.5 million; $5.8 million was reserved specifically for actual cases and $22.7 million for claims incurred but not reported, which were estimated using actuarial methods. Based on the company’s experience in defending product liability claims, management believes the current reserves are adequate for estimated case resolutions on aggregate self-insured claims and insured claims. Any recoveries from insurance carriers are dependent upon the legal sufficiency of claims and solvency of insurance carriers.
At September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the company had reserved $102.0 million and $104.4 million, respectively, for warranty claims included in product warranties and other non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Certain of these warranty and other related claims involve matters in dispute that ultimately are resolved by negotiation, arbitration, or litigation.
It is reasonably possible that the estimates for environmental remediation, product liability and warranty costs may change in the near future based upon new information that may arise or matters that are beyond the scope of the company’s historical experience. Presently, there are no reliable methods to estimate the amount of any such potential changes.
The company is involved in numerous lawsuits involving asbestos-related claims in which the company is one of numerous defendants. After taking into consideration legal counsel’s evaluation of such actions, the current political environment with respect to asbestos related claims, and the liabilities accrued with respect to such matters, in the opinion of management, ultimate resolution is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows of the company.
The company is also involved in various legal actions arising out of the normal course of business, which, taking into account the liabilities accrued and legal counsel’s evaluation of such actions, in the opinion of management, the ultimate resolution, individually and in the aggregate, is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
|
|
15. Guarantees
The company periodically enters into transactions with customers that provide for residual value guarantees and buyback commitments. These initial transactions are recorded as deferred revenue and are amortized to income on a straight-line basis over a period equal to that of the customer’s third party financing agreement. The deferred revenue included in other current and non-current liabilities at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $59.5 million and $61.2 million, respectively. The total amount of residual value guarantees and buyback commitments given by the company and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $84.8 million and $89.5 million, respectively. These amounts are not reduced for amounts the company would recover from repossession and subsequent resale of the units. The residual value guarantees and buyback commitments expire at various times through 2016.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the company sold no additional long term notes receivable to third party financing companies. Related to notes sold in other periods, the company guarantees some percentage, up to 100%, of collection of the notes to the financing companies. The company has accounted for the sales of the notes as a financing of receivables. The receivables remain on the company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, net of payments made, in other current and non-current assets, and the company has recognized an obligation equal to the net outstanding balance of the notes in other current and non-current liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash flow benefit of these transactions is reflected as financing activities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the customers paid $0.2 million and $13.7 million, respectively, on the notes to the third party financing companies. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, the customers paid $0.6 million and $2.0 million, respectively, on the notes to the third party financing companies. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the outstanding balance of the notes receivable guaranteed by the company was $0.7 million and $14.1 million, respectively.
In the normal course of business, the company provides its customers a warranty covering workmanship, and in some cases materials, on products manufactured by the company. The warranty generally provides that products will be free from defects for periods ranging from 12 to 60 months with certain equipment having longer-term warranties. If a product fails to comply with the company’s warranty, the company may be obligated, at its expense, to correct any defect by repairing or replacing such defective products. The company provides for an estimate of costs that may be incurred under its warranty at the time product revenue is recognized. These costs primarily include labor and materials, as necessary, associated with repair or replacement. The primary factors that affect the company’s warranty liability include the number of units shipped and historical and anticipated warranty claims. As these factors are impacted by actual experience and future expectations, the company assesses the adequacy of its recorded warranty liability and adjusts the amounts as necessary. Below is a table summarizing the warranty activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011:
|
|
16. Employee Benefit Plans
The company provides certain pension, health care and death benefits for eligible retirees and their dependents. The pension benefits are funded, while the health care and death benefits are not funded but are paid as incurred. Eligibility for coverage is based on meeting certain years of service and retirement qualifications. These benefits may be subject to deductibles, co-payment provisions, and other limitations. The company has reserved the right to modify these benefits.
The components of periodic benefit costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 are as follows:
|
|
17. Restructuring
The following is a rollforward of all restructuring activities relating to the Crane segment for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2012 (in millions):
The following is a rollforward of all restructuring activities relating to the Foodservice segment for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2012 (in millions):
|
|
18. Recent Accounting Changes and Pronouncements
In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02 which provides an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step test for indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. The revised standard is effective for the company’s annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for interim periods beginning after September 15, 2012. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08 which provides an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the current two-step test for goodwill impairment. If an entity believes, as a result of its qualitative assessment, that it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further testing is required. The revised standard is effective for the company’s annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not impact the company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.
In June 2011 and December 2011, the FASB issued an update to ASC Topic No. 220, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income,” which eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of shareholders’ equity. The company can elect to present the items of net income and other comprehensive income in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Under either method the statement would need to be presented with equal prominence as the other primary financial statements. The amended guidance, which must be applied retroactively, is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011, and has been incorporated into these financial statements.
|
|
19. Business Segments
The company identifies its segments using the “management approach,” which designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of the company’s reportable segments. The company has two reportable segments: Crane and Foodservice. The company has not aggregated individual operating segments within these reportable segments. Net sales and earnings from operations by segment are summarized as follows:
Crane segment operating earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 includes amortization expense of $1.5 million and $4.5 million, respectively. Crane segment operating earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 includes amortization expense of $1.6 million and $5.0 million, respectively. Foodservice segment operating earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 includes amortization expense of $8.0 million and $24.1 million, respectively. Foodservice segment operating earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011 includes amortization expense of $8.2 million and $24.2 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the total assets by segment were as follows:
|
|
20. Subsequent Events
On October 19, 2012, the company completed the sale of $300 million aggregate principal amount of its 5.875% Senior Notes due October 2022 (the “2022 Notes”) at an issue price of 100%. The 2022 Notes are guaranteed by certain of the company’s 100% owned subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”) and were issued under an Indenture, dated as of February 8, 2010, between the company and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (the “Trustee”), as supplemented by a Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 19, 2012, among the company, the Guarantors and the Trustee (the “Supplemental Indenture”). The Guarantors of the 2022 Notes also guarantee the 2018 Notes and 2020 Notes.
Proceeds for the 2022 Notes were used to redeem the entire $150 million aggregate principal amount of the company’s 2013 Notes, to repay $36 million of Term Loan B and a portion of the outstanding revolver borrowings under its Senior Credit Facility.
The 2022 Notes bear interest at a rate of 5.875% per year (payable semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on April 15, 2013), and will mature on October 15, 2022.
The company may redeem the 2022 Notes at any time prior to October 15, 2017 at a “make-whole” redemption price and at any time on or after October 15, 2017 at various redemption prices set forth in the Supplemental Indenture, plus, in each case, accrued but unpaid interest, if any, to the date of redemption. In addition, at any time prior to October 15, 2015, the company is permitted to redeem up to 35% of the 2022 Notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 105.875%.
The company is required to offer to repurchase the 2022 Notes for cash at a price of 101% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, upon the occurrence of a change of control triggering event.
The Guarantors, jointly and severally, fully and unconditionally guarantee (the “Guarantees”), on a senior unsecured basis, the company’s obligations under the Supplemental Indenture and the 2022 Notes.
The Supplemental Indenture includes customary events of default. If an event of default occurs and is continuing with respect to the 2022 Notes, then the Trustee or the holders of at least 25% of the principal amount of the outstanding 2022 Notes may declare the principal and accrued interest on all of the 2022 Notes to be due and payable immediately. In addition, in the case of an event of default arising from certain events of bankruptcy, all unpaid principal of, and premium, if any, and accrued and unpaid interest on all outstanding 2022 Notes will become due and payable immediately.
During October 2012, the company entered into fixed-to-float interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges with notional values of $100.0 million related to the 2022 Notes. As a result, $100.0 million of the 2020 Notes are hedged to a floating interest rate with a weighted average spread of 4.10%, plus the one-month LIBOR rate.
On November 1, 2012 the company declared a cash dividend of $0.08 per share, payable on December 10, 2012 to shareholders of record on November 30, 2012.
|
|
21. Subsidiary Guarantors of 2013 Notes, 2018 Notes and 2020 Notes
The following tables present condensed consolidating financial information for (a) The Manitowoc Company, Inc. (Parent); (b) the guarantors of the 2013 Notes, 2018 Notes and 2020 Notes, which include substantially all of the domestic, 100% owned subsidiaries of the company (Subsidiary Guarantors); and (c) the wholly- and partially-owned foreign subsidiaries of the Parent, which do not guarantee the 2013 Notes, 2018 Notes and 2020 Notes (Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries). Separate financial statements of the Subsidiary Guarantors are not presented because the guarantors are fully and unconditionally, jointly and severally liable under the guarantees, except for normal and customary release provisions.
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 (In millions)
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 (In millions)
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (In millions)
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (In millions)
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2012 (In millions)
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011 (In millions)
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 (In millions)
The Manitowoc Company, Inc. Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|