1. Nature of the Business

LogMeIn, Inc. (the “Company”) provides essential cloud-based collaboration, IT management and customer service offerings aimed at addressing the evolving multi-device security, management and accessibility requirements of the new mobile workplace. The Company’s product line includes AppGuru™, BoldChat^®, Cubby™, join.me^®, LogMeIn Free^®, LogMeIn Pro^®, LogMeIn^® Central™, LogMeIn Rescue^®, LogMeIn^® Rescue+Mobile™, LogMeIn Backup^®, LogMeIn Ignition™, LogMeIn for iOS, LogMeIn Hamachi^®, Xively™ and RemotelyAnywhere^®. The Company is headquartered in Boston, Massachusetts with wholly-owned subsidiaries in Hungary, The Netherlands, Australia, the United Kingdom, Brazil, Japan, India and Ireland.

Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company has prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and the related interim information contained within the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read along with the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2013. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of future results. The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Marketable Securities — The Company’s marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary are included as a component of earnings based on the specific identification method. Fair value is determined based on quoted market prices. At December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, marketable securities consisted of U.S. government agency securities that have remaining maturities within two years and have an aggregate amortized cost of $100,082,602 and $100,323,228 and an aggregate fair value of $100,160,889 and $100,402,229, including $82,787 and $85,456 of unrealized gains and $4,500 and $6,455 of unrealized losses, respectively.

Revenue Recognition — The Company derives revenue primarily from subscription fees related to its LogMeIn premium services, the licensing of its Ignition for iPhone, iPad, and Android software products, and from the licensing of its RemotelyAnywhere software and its related maintenance.

Revenue from the Company’s LogMeIn premium services is recognized on a daily basis over the subscription term as the services are delivered, provided that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is deemed reasonably assured. Subscription periods range from monthly to five years, but are generally one year in duration. The Company’s software cannot be run on another entity’s hardware nor do customers have the right to take possession of the software and use it on their own or another entity’s hardware.

Revenue from the sales of the Company’s Ignition for iPhone, iPad and Android software products, which are sold as a perpetual license, is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been provided to the customer, the collection of the fee is probable, and the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.

The Company’s multi-element arrangements typically include subscription and professional services, which may include development services. The Company evaluates each element within the arrangement to determine if they can be accounted for as separate units of accounting. If the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a standalone basis, either because they are sold separately by any vendor or the customer could resell the delivered item or items on a standalone basis, the Company has determined that the deliverables within these arrangements qualify for treatment as separate units of accounting. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue for each delivered item or items as a separate earnings process commencing when all of the significant performance obligations have been performed and when all of the revenue recognition criteria have been met. In cases where the Company has determined that the delivered items within its multi-element arrangements do not have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, the arrangement is accounted for as a single unit of accounting and the related consideration is recognized ratably over the estimated customer life, commencing when all of the significant performance obligations have been delivered and when all of the revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Revenues are reported net of applicable sales and use tax, value-added tax, and other transaction taxes imposed on the related transaction.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers — The Company’s principal credit risk relates to its cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, restricted cash, and accounts receivable. Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are deposited primarily with financial institutions that management believes to be of high-credit quality and custody of its marketable securities is with an accredited financial institution. To manage accounts receivable credit risk, the Company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses. To date, losses resulting from uncollected receivables have not exceeded management’s expectations.

As of December 31, 2012, no customers accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable and no customers accounted for 10% or more of revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 or 2013. As of September 30, 2013, a third-party credit card processor accounted for 10% of accounts receivable.

Research and Development — Research and development expenditures are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill — Goodwill is the excess of the acquisition price over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired. The Company does not amortize goodwill, but performs an annual impairment test of goodwill on the last day of its fiscal year and whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may exceed its fair value. The Company operates as a single operating segment with one reporting unit and consequently evaluates goodwill for impairment based on an evaluation of the fair value of the Company as a whole. Through September 30, 2013, no impairments have occurred.

Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets — The Company records intangible assets at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Intangible assets are amortized based upon the pattern in which their economic benefit will be realized, or if this pattern cannot be reliably determined, using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The Company’s intangible assets have estimated useful lives which range from one to seven years.

Foreign Currency Translation — The functional currency of operations outside the United States of America is deemed to be the currency of the local country. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars using the period-end exchange rate, and income and expense items are translated using the average exchange rate during the period. Cumulative translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are charged to non-operating income and expense. The Company had foreign currency losses of approximately $5,000 and $510,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and foreign currency losses of approximately $141,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and foreign currency gains of approximately $313,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Stock-Based Compensation — Stock-based compensation is measured based upon the grant date fair value and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis in the financial statements over the vesting period of the award for those awards expected to vest. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of stock awards. The Company uses the with-or-without method to determine when it will realize excess tax benefits from stock based compensation. Under this method, the Company will realize these excess tax benefits only after it realizes the tax benefits of net operating losses from operations.

Income Taxes — Deferred income taxes are provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and operating loss carry-forwards and credits using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. At each balance sheet date, the Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized, and recognizes a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment requires judgment as to the likelihood and amounts of future taxable income by tax jurisdiction.

The Company evaluates its uncertain tax positions based on a determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than not to be realized. Potential interest and penalties associated with any uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of income tax expense. Through December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, the Company has provided a liability for approximately $251,000 and $272,000 for uncertain tax positions, respectively. These uncertain tax positions would impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized.

Segment Data — Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision making group, in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The Company, which uses consolidated financial information in determining how to allocate resources and assess performance, has determined that it operates in one segment.

The Company’s revenue by geography (based on customer address) is as follows:

Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations — As permitted under Delaware law, the Company has agreements whereby the Company indemnifies certain of its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. As permitted under Delaware law, the Company also has similar indemnification obligations under its certificate of incorporation and by-laws. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has director’s and officer’s insurance coverage that the Company believes limits its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.

The Company has entered into agreements with certain customers that contractually obligate the Company to indemnify the customer from certain claims alleging that the Company’s products infringe third-party patents, copyrights, or trademarks. The term of these indemnification obligations is generally perpetual. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited. Through September 30, 2013, the Company has not experienced any losses related to these indemnification obligations.

In November 2012, the Company filed suit against Pragmatus Telecom LLC (“Pragmatus”), seeking declaratory judgment after certain of the Company’s customers received letters from Pragmatus claiming that their use of certain LogMeIn services infringed upon three patents allegedly owned by Pragmatus. On March 29, 2013, the Company and Pragmatus entered into a License Agreement, which granted the Company a fully-paid license covering the patents at issue. The Company paid Pragmatus a one-time licensing fee in April 2013, after a portion of the fee was reimbursed in March 2013 from a designated escrow arrangement associated with a prior acquisition. The Company recorded approximately $1.2 million of expense related to this matter in general and administrative expenses in March 2013. As a result, the Company’s declaratory judgment action against Pragmatus was dismissed by the court on May 3, 2013.

Net Income (loss) Per Share — Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and the weighted average number of potential common shares outstanding from the assumed exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company incurred a net loss and therefore, the effect of the Company’s outstanding common stock equivalents were not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share as they were anti-dilutive. Accordingly, basic and dilutive net loss per share for each period were identical.

The Company excluded the following options to purchase common shares and restricted stock units from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share either because they had an anti-dilutive impact or because the Company had a net loss in the period:

Basic and diluted net income per share was calculated as follows:

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements — In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02 relating to comprehensive income (FASB ASC Topic 220), which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component (the respective line items of net income). This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted this ASU and the impact was not material to its disclosures.

3. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable, approximate their fair values due to their short maturities. The Company’s financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company at the measurement date.

Level 2: Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The following table summarizes the basis used to measure certain of the Company’s financial assets that are carried at fair value:

Bank deposits are classified within the second level of the fair value hierarchy and the fair value of those assets are determined based upon quoted prices for similar assets in active markets.

The Level 3 liability consists of contingent consideration related to the July 19, 2011 acquisition of Xively, formally known as Cosm. The fair value of the contingent consideration was estimated by applying a probability based model, which utilizes significant inputs that are unobservable in the market. Key assumptions include a 13% discount rate and an assumption that the earn-out will be achieved. The current portion of contingent consideration was included in Accrued liabilities and the non-current portion was included in Other long-term liabilities. The contingent consideration liability was settled in the quarter ended September 30, 2013. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending Level 3 liability is as follows:

4. Acquisitions

On January 6, 2012, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Bold Software, LLC (“Bold”), a Wichita, Kansas-based limited liability corporation, for a cash purchase price of approximately $15.3 million plus contingent, retention-based bonuses totaling $1.5 million, which are expected to be paid over a two year period from the date of acquisition.

The Bold acquisition has been accounted for as a business combination. The assets acquired and the liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The Company retained an independent third party valuation firm to calculate the fair value of the intangible assets with estimates and assumptions provided by Company management. The excess of the purchase price over the tangible net assets and identifiable intangible assets was recorded as goodwill.

The purchase price was allocated as follows:

The asset purchase agreement included a contingent, retention-based bonus program provision requiring the Company to make additional payments to employees, including former Bold owners now employed by the Company, on the first and second anniversaries of the acquisition, contingent upon their continued employment. The range of the contingent, retention-based bonus payments that the Company could pay is between $0 to $1,500,000. The Company has concluded that the arrangement is a compensation arrangement and is accruing the maximum payout ratably over the performance period, as it believes it is probable that the criteria will be met. As of October 25, 2013, the Company has paid $650,000 in contingent, retention-based bonus payments and expects to pay $845,000 in January 2014.

The goodwill recorded in connection with this transaction is primarily related to the expected synergies to be achieved related to the Company’s ability to leverage its existing sales and marketing capacity and customer base to accelerate BoldChat sales, and the ability to leverage Bold’s technology with the Company’s existing support service. All goodwill acquired is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

The Company incurred approximately $0 and $0.1 million of acquisition-related costs which are included in general and administrative expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

5. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The changes in the carry amounts of goodwill for nine months ended September 30, 2013 are due to the impact of foreign currency translation adjustments related to intangible asset balances that are recorded in non-U.S. currencies.

Changes in goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, are as follows:

Intangible assets consist of the following:

        As a result of the Bold acquisition, the Company capitalized $1,090,000 of technology, $30,000 of trade names and trademarks, $2,760,000 of customer base and $160,000 of non-compete agreements as intangible assets. Changes in the gross carrying amount of the intangible assets are due to foreign currency translation adjustments. The Company is amortizing the intangible assets based upon the pattern in which their economic benefit will be realized, or if this pattern cannot be reliably determined, using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The intangible assets have estimated useful lives which range from one to seven years.

The Company capitalized $207,501 and $204,713 during the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and $502,385 and $760,871 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively of costs related to internally developed computer software to be sold as a service incurred during the application development stage and is amortizing these costs over the expected lives of the related services. The Company paid $0 and $358,475 to acquire domain names in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The Company is amortizing its intangible assets over the estimated lives noted above. Amortization expense for intangible assets was $533,164 and $629,718 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and $1,588,583 and $1,874,029 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Amortization relating to software, technology and internally developed software is recorded within cost of revenues and the amortization of trade name and trademark, customer base, domain names, and non-compete agreements is recorded within operating expenses. Future estimated amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows at September 30, 2013:

6. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

7. Income Taxes

The Company recorded a provision for federal, state and foreign income taxes of approximately $1.1 million and $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and $3.8 million and $3.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The tax provision recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 is a result of the Company generating taxable income primarily in the United States offset by losses in certain foreign jurisdictions where there is no corresponding benefit.

Deferred income taxes are provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and operating loss carry-forwards and credits using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. At each balance sheet date, the Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized, and recognizes a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment requires judgment as to the likelihood and amounts of future taxable income by tax jurisdiction.

During 2012, the Company reassessed the need for a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets relating to its Xively subsidiary and concluded that it was more likely than not that it would be able to realize its deferred tax assets as a result of forecasted future earnings. Accordingly, the Company reversed the valuation allowance related to its Xively deferred tax assets of approximately $677,000 in 2012. As of December 31, 2012, and September 30, 2013, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets of its Hungarian subsidiary. This entity has historical losses and the Company concluded it was not more likely than not that these deferred tax assets are realizable.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s income tax returns since inception are open to examination by federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. The Company has recorded a liability related to uncertain tax provisions of approximately $251,000 and $272,000 as of December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, respectively. The Company’s policy is to record estimated interest and penalty related to the underpayment of income taxes or unrecognized tax benefits as a component of its income tax provision. The Company recognized approximately $2,000 of interest expense in its statements of income during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. The Company did not recognize any interest or penalties in its statement of operations during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2013, and there are no accruals for interest or penalties at either December 31, 2012 or September 30, 2013.

8. Common Stock and Equity

In February 2013, the Company’s board of directors approved a $25 million share repurchase program. Effective August 13, 2013, the Company replaced its previous $25 million share repurchase program, pursuant to which the Company had spent approximately $16 million, with a new $50 million share repurchase program. Share repurchases are made from time-to-time in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions or otherwise, in accordance with applicable securities laws and regulations. The timing and amount of any share repurchases are determined by the Company’s management based on its evaluation of market conditions, the trading price of the stock, regulatory requirements and other factors. The share repurchase program may be suspended, modified or discontinued at any time at the Company’s discretion without prior notice.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company repurchased 188,258 and 948,743 shares of its common stock at an average price of $30.20 and $21.39 per share at a cost of approximately $5,685,000 and $20,292,000, respectively. At September 30, 2013, approximately $46,163,000 remained available under the Company’s share repurchase program.

9. Stock Based Awards

        The Company’s 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (“2009 Plan”) is administered by the Board of Directors and Compensation Committee, which have the authority to designate participants and determine the number and type of awards to be granted and any other terms or conditions of the awards. Options generally vest over a four-year period and expire ten years from the date of grant. Restricted stock units with service-based vesting conditions generally vest over a three-year period while restricted stock units with market-based vesting conditions generally vest over two or three-year periods. Certain stock-based awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control. On May 23, 2013, the Company’s stockholders approved an amendment to the 2009 Plan that increased the shares available to grant under the plan by 1,400,000 shares. As of September 30, 2013, there were 1,460,866 shares available for grant under the 2009 Plan.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of stock options. The Company estimates the expected volatility of its common stock at the date of grant based on the historical volatility of comparable public companies over the option’s expected term as well as its own stock price volatility since the Company’s IPO. The Company estimates expected term based on historical exercise activity and giving consideration to the contractual term of the options, vesting schedules, employee turnover, and expectation of employee exercise behavior. The assumed dividend yield is based upon the Company’s expectation of not paying dividends in the foreseeable future. The risk-free rate for periods within the estimated life of the stock option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Historical employee turnover data is used to estimate pre-vesting stock option forfeiture rates. The compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the stock award, which is generally four years for options.

The Company used the following assumptions to apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model:

The following table summarizes stock option activity:

The aggregate intrinsic value was calculated based on the positive differences between the fair value of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, of $22.41 and $31.05 per share, respectively, or at time of exercise, and the exercise price of the options.

The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options issued for the year ended December 31, 2012 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, was $18.57 and $11.60 per share, respectively.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company granted 337,675 and 709,045 restricted stock units, respectively, containing time-based vesting conditions which generally lapse over a three year period.

In August 2013, the Company granted 74,000 restricted stock units containing market-based vesting conditions which vest upon the achievement of a total shareholder return target (“TSR units”) measured over the performance period which ranges from two to three years. The number of TSR units that will vest is based on the achievement of the Total Shareholder Return which can range from 0% of the target shares to 200% of the target shares, or 148,000, and is also based upon continued employment of the participant over the vesting period which ranges from two to three years. The TSR units are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The number of awards expected to be earned, based on achievement of the TSR market condition, is factored into the grant date Monte Carlo valuation for the TSR unit. Compensation cost is recognized regardless of the actual number of awards that are earned based on the market condition. Expected volatility is based on the Company’s historical volatility. The risk-free interest rate is based upon U.S. Treasury securities with a term similar to vesting term of the restricted stock unit.

The assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation model include (but are not limited to) the following:

Compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period. At September 30, 2013, all of the TSR units granted in August 2013 remain outstanding.

The following table summarizes all restricted stock unit activity:

The Company recognized stock based compensation expense within the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations as summarized in the following table:

As of September 30, 2013, there was approximately $41,797,359 of total unrecognized share-based compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested stock awards which are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.2 years. The total unrecognized share-based compensation cost will be adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases — The Company has operating lease agreements for offices in Massachusetts, Hungary, Australia, the United Kingdom, Ireland and India that expire through 2023.

In April 2012, the Company entered into a lease for a new corporate headquarters located in Boston, Massachusetts. The landlord was obligated to rehabilitate the existing building and the lease term began in April 2013 and extends through July 2023. The aggregate amount of minimum lease payments to be made over the term of the lease is approximately $41.3 million. Pursuant to the terms of the lease, the landlord was responsible for making certain improvements to the leased space up to an agreed upon cost to the landlord. Any excess costs for these improvements were billed by the landlord to the Company as additional rent. These excess costs total $5.6 million, all of which was paid as of September 30, 2013. The lease required a security deposit of approximately $3.3 million in the form of an irrevocable standby letter of credit which is collateralized by a bank deposit in the amount of approximately $3.5 million or 105 percent of the security deposit. The security deposit is classified as restricted cash. The lease includes an option to extend the original term of the lease for two successive five year periods.

In October 2012, the Company entered into a lease for new office space in Dublin, Ireland. The term of the new office space began in October 2012 and extends through October 2022. The approximate annual lease payments for the new office space are $165,000 (EUR 122,000). The lease agreement required a security deposit of approximately $253,000 (EUR 187,000) and contains a termination option which allows the Company to terminate the lease pursuant to certain lease provisions.

In September 2013, the Company entered into a lease for new office space in Sydney, Australia. The term of the new office space begins in December 2013 and extends through May 2017. The aggregate amount of minimum lease payments to be made over the term of the lease is approximately $663,000 (AUD 711,000). The lease agreement required a bank guarantee of approximately $115,000 (AUD 123,000). The bank guarantee will be classified as restricted cash.

Rent expense under all leases was approximately $793,000 and $1,642,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively, and $2,359,000 and $4,295,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The Company records rent expense on a straight-line basis for leases with scheduled escalation clauses or free rent periods.

The Company also enters into hosting services agreements with third-party data centers and internet service providers that are subject to annual renewal. Hosting fees incurred under these arrangements totaled approximately $821,000 and $1,106,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively and $2,207,000 and $3,434,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2013, respectively.

On July 2, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase a software asset. The Company will pay between $7.0 million and $12.0 million for the asset depending on the type and timing of the final deliverables from the seller. Payment is expected to be made in the fourth quarter of 2013, and the purchased asset will be included in Intangible Assets.

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases including one year commitments associated with the Company’s hosting services arrangements are approximately as follows at September 30, 2013:

Litigation — On September 8, 2010, 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc., or 01, filed a complaint that named the Company as a defendant in a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Civil Action No. 1:10cv1007) alleging that the Company infringed U.S. Patent No. 6,928,479, or the ‘479 Patent, which is owned by 01 and has claims directed to a particular application or system for providing a private communication portal from one computer to a second computer. The complaint sought damages in an unspecified amount and injunctive relief. On April 1, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment of non-infringement. The court issued a written order regarding this decision on May 4, 2011. On May 13, 2011, 01 filed a notice of appeal appealing the court’s ruling granting summary judgment. On July 31, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated the lower court’s summary judgment of non-infringement ruling and remanded the case back to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia with revised claim construction. The trial commenced on March 18, 2013 and on March 26, 2013, a jury in the Eastern District of Virginia found that the Company’s products do not infringe the ‘479 Patent as previously asserted by 01. The court issued a written order regarding this decision on April 2, 2013. On June 26, 2013, the court issued a written opinion denying all pending post-trial motions, thereby preserving the jury’s non-infringement verdict. On June 26, 2013, 01 filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the jury’s non-infringement verdict and on July 18, 2013, the Company filed a notice of cross appeal seeking to appeal the jury’s decisions regarding invalidity and inequitable conduct. A hearing date has not been scheduled at this time. At this time the Company does not believe that a loss is probable and remains unable to reasonably estimate a possible loss or range of loss associated with this litigation.

On November 21, 2012, the Company filed suit against Pragmatus Telecom LLC, or Pragmatus, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware (Civil Action No. 12-1507) seeking a declaratory judgment that the Company’s products do not infringe three patents allegedly owned by Pragmatus after certain of the Company’s customers received letters from Pragmatus claiming that their use of certain LogMeIn services infringed upon those patents. On March 29, 2013, the Company and Pragmatus entered into a License Agreement, which granted the Company a fully-paid license covering the patents at issue. The Company paid Pragmatus a one-time license fee in connection with the License Agreement in April 2013. As a result, the Company’s declaratory judgment action was dismissed by the court on May 3, 2013.

The Company is from time to time subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, which arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company routinely assesses its current litigation and/or threatened litigation as to the probability of ultimately incurring a liability, and records its best estimate of the ultimate loss in situations where the Company assesses the likelihood of loss as probable. While the outcome of these other claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these other legal matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidation — The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company has prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements — The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements and the related interim information contained within the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read along with the Company’s audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2013. The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal and recurring adjustments, necessary for the fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The results for the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of future results. The Company considers events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued to provide additional evidence relative to certain estimates or to identify matters that require additional disclosure.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, estimates are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Marketable Securities — The Company’s marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary are included as a component of earnings based on the specific identification method. Fair value is determined based on quoted market prices. At December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, marketable securities consisted of U.S. government agency securities that have remaining maturities within two years and have an aggregate amortized cost of $100,082,602 and $100,323,228 and an aggregate fair value of $100,160,889 and $100,402,229, including $82,787 and $85,456 of unrealized gains and $4,500 and $6,455 of unrealized losses, respectively.

Revenue Recognition — The Company derives revenue primarily from subscription fees related to its LogMeIn premium services, the licensing of its Ignition for iPhone, iPad, and Android software products, and from the licensing of its RemotelyAnywhere software and its related maintenance.

Revenue from the Company’s LogMeIn premium services is recognized on a daily basis over the subscription term as the services are delivered, provided that there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectability is deemed reasonably assured. Subscription periods range from monthly to five years, but are generally one year in duration. The Company’s software cannot be run on another entity’s hardware nor do customers have the right to take possession of the software and use it on their own or another entity’s hardware.

Revenue from the sales of the Company’s Ignition for iPhone, iPad and Android software products, which are sold as a perpetual license, is recognized when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, the product has been provided to the customer, the collection of the fee is probable, and the amount of fees to be paid by the customer is fixed or determinable.

The Company’s multi-element arrangements typically include subscription and professional services, which may include development services. The Company evaluates each element within the arrangement to determine if they can be accounted for as separate units of accounting. If the delivered item or items have value to the customer on a standalone basis, either because they are sold separately by any vendor or the customer could resell the delivered item or items on a standalone basis, the Company has determined that the deliverables within these arrangements qualify for treatment as separate units of accounting. Accordingly, the Company recognizes revenue for each delivered item or items as a separate earnings process commencing when all of the significant performance obligations have been performed and when all of the revenue recognition criteria have been met. In cases where the Company has determined that the delivered items within its multi-element arrangements do not have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis, the arrangement is accounted for as a single unit of accounting and the related consideration is recognized ratably over the estimated customer life, commencing when all of the significant performance obligations have been delivered and when all of the revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Revenues are reported net of applicable sales and use tax, value-added tax, and other transaction taxes imposed on the related transaction.

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Significant Customers — The Company’s principal credit risk relates to its cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities, restricted cash, and accounts receivable. Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash are deposited primarily with financial institutions that management believes to be of high-credit quality and custody of its marketable securities is with an accredited financial institution. To manage accounts receivable credit risk, the Company regularly evaluates the creditworthiness of its customers and maintains allowances for potential credit losses. To date, losses resulting from uncollected receivables have not exceeded management’s expectations.

As of December 31, 2012, no customers accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable and no customers accounted for 10% or more of revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 or 2013. As of September 30, 2013, a third-party credit card processor accounted for 10% of accounts receivable.

Goodwill — Goodwill is the excess of the acquisition price over the fair value of the tangible and identifiable intangible net assets acquired. The Company does not amortize goodwill, but performs an annual impairment test of goodwill on the last day of its fiscal year and whenever events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of goodwill may exceed its fair value. The Company operates as a single operating segment with one reporting unit and consequently evaluates goodwill for impairment based on an evaluation of the fair value of the Company as a whole. Through September 30, 2013, no impairments have occurred.

Long-Lived Assets and Intangible Assets — The Company records intangible assets at their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. Intangible assets are amortized based upon the pattern in which their economic benefit will be realized, or if this pattern cannot be reliably determined, using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The Company’s intangible assets have estimated useful lives which range from one to seven years.

Foreign Currency Translation — The functional currency of operations outside the United States of America is deemed to be the currency of the local country. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars using the period-end exchange rate, and income and expense items are translated using the average exchange rate during the period. Cumulative translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are charged to non-operating income and expense. The Company had foreign currency losses of approximately $5,000 and $510,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and foreign currency losses of approximately $141,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and foreign currency gains of approximately $313,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Stock-Based Compensation — Stock-based compensation is measured based upon the grant date fair value and recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis in the financial statements over the vesting period of the award for those awards expected to vest. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of stock awards. The Company uses the with-or-without method to determine when it will realize excess tax benefits from stock based compensation. Under this method, the Company will realize these excess tax benefits only after it realizes the tax benefits of net operating losses from operations.

Income Taxes — Deferred income taxes are provided for the tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and operating loss carry-forwards and credits using enacted tax rates expected to be in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. At each balance sheet date, the Company assesses the likelihood that deferred tax assets will be realized, and recognizes a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. This assessment requires judgment as to the likelihood and amounts of future taxable income by tax jurisdiction.

The Company evaluates its uncertain tax positions based on a determination of whether and how much of a tax benefit taken by the Company in its tax filings or positions is more likely than not to be realized. Potential interest and penalties associated with any uncertain tax positions are recorded as a component of income tax expense. Through December 31, 2012 and September 30, 2013, the Company has provided a liability for approximately $251,000 and $272,000 for uncertain tax positions, respectively. These uncertain tax positions would impact the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized.

Segment Data — Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker, or decision making group, in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. The Company, which uses consolidated financial information in determining how to allocate resources and assess performance, has determined that it operates in one segment.

The Company’s revenue by geography (based on customer address) is as follows:

Guarantees and Indemnification Obligations — As permitted under Delaware law, the Company has agreements whereby the Company indemnifies certain of its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was, serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. As permitted under Delaware law, the Company also has similar indemnification obligations under its certificate of incorporation and by-laws. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has director’s and officer’s insurance coverage that the Company believes limits its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid.

The Company has entered into agreements with certain customers that contractually obligate the Company to indemnify the customer from certain claims alleging that the Company’s products infringe third-party patents, copyrights, or trademarks. The term of these indemnification obligations is generally perpetual. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification obligations is unlimited. Through September 30, 2013, the Company has not experienced any losses related to these indemnification obligations.

In November 2012, the Company filed suit against Pragmatus Telecom LLC (“Pragmatus”), seeking declaratory judgment after certain of the Company’s customers received letters from Pragmatus claiming that their use of certain LogMeIn services infringed upon three patents allegedly owned by Pragmatus. On March 29, 2013, the Company and Pragmatus entered into a License Agreement, which granted the Company a fully-paid license covering the patents at issue. The Company paid Pragmatus a one-time licensing fee in April 2013, after a portion of the fee was reimbursed in March 2013 from a designated escrow arrangement associated with a prior acquisition. The Company recorded approximately $1.2 million of expense related to this matter in general and administrative expenses in March 2013. As a result, the Company’s declaratory judgment action against Pragmatus was dismissed by the court on May 3, 2013.

Net Income (loss) Per Share — Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period and the weighted average number of potential common shares outstanding from the assumed exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock units. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company incurred a net loss and therefore, the effect of the Company’s outstanding common stock equivalents were not included in the calculation of diluted loss per share as they were anti-dilutive. Accordingly, basic and dilutive net loss per share for each period were identical.

The Company excluded the following options to purchase common shares and restricted stock units from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share either because they had an anti-dilutive impact or because the Company had a net loss in the period:

Basic and diluted net income per share was calculated as follows:

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements — In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02 relating to comprehensive income (FASB ASC Topic 220), which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component (the respective line items of net income). This pronouncement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted this ASU and the impact was not material to its disclosures.

The Company’s revenue by geography (based on customer address) is as follows:

The Company excluded the following options to purchase common shares and restricted stock units from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share either because they had an anti-dilutive impact or because the Company had a net loss in the period:

Basic and diluted net income per share was calculated as follows:

The following table summarizes the basis used to measure certain of the Company’s financial assets that are carried at fair value:

Bank deposits are classified within the second level of the fair value hierarchy and the fair value of those assets are determined based upon quoted prices for similar assets in active markets.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending Level 3 liability is as follows:

The purchase price was allocated as follows:

Changes in goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, are as follows:

Intangible assets consist of the following:

Future estimated amortization expense for intangible assets is as follows at September 30, 2013:

Accrued expenses consisted of the following: