CROSSTEX ENERGY LP, 10-K filed on 2/28/2012
Annual Report
Document and Entity Information (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Entity Information [Line Items]
 
Document Type
10-K 
Document Fiscal Period Focus
Q4 
Document Period End Date
Dec. 31, 2011 
Document Fiscal Year Focus
2011 
Amendment Flag
false 
Entity Registrant Name
CROSSTEX ENERGY LP 
Entity Central Index Key
0001179060 
Entity Current Reporting Status
Yes 
Entity Voluntary Filers
No 
Current Fiscal Year End Date
--12-31 
Entity Filer Category
Accelerated Filer 
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer
Yes 
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding
50,863,334 
Entity Public Float
$ 457,405,664 
Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
Revenues:
 
 
 
Midstream
$ 2,013,942 
$ 1,792,676 
$ 1,583,551 
Operating costs and expenses:
 
 
 
Purchased gas and NGLs
1,638,777 
1,454,376 
1,272,329 
Operating expenses
111,778 
105,060 
110,394 
General and administrative
52,801 
48,414 
59,854 
(Gain) loss on sale of property
264 
(13,881)
(666)
(Gain) loss on derivatives
7,776 
9,100 
(2,994)
Impairments
1,311 
2,894 
Depreciation and amortization
125,284 
111,551 
119,088 
Total operating costs and expenses
1,936,680 
1,715,931 
1,560,899 
Operating income
77,262 
76,745 
22,652 
Other income (expense):
 
 
 
Interest Income (Expense), Net
(79,233)
(87,035)
(95,078)
Loss on extinguishment of debt
(14,713)
(4,669)
Other income
707 
295 
1,400 
Total other income (expense)
(78,526)
(101,453)
(98,347)
Loss from continuing operations before non-controlling interest and income taxes
(1,264)
(24,708)
(75,695)
Income tax provision
(1,126)
(1,121)
(1,790)
Loss from continuing operations before discontinued operations
(2,390)
(25,829)
(77,485)
Discontinued operations:
 
 
 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
(1,796)
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
183,747 
Discontinued operations, net of tax
181,951 
Net income (loss)
(2,390)
(25,829)
104,466 
Less: Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to the non-controlling interest
(48)
19 
60 
Net income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.
(2,342)
(25,848)
104,406 
Preferred interest in net income attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.
18,088 
13,750 
Beneficial conversion feature attributable to preferred units
22,279 
General partner interest in net income (loss)
732 
4,371 
819 
Limited partners' interest in net income (loss)
$ (19,698)
$ (57,506)
$ 105,225 
Net income (loss) per limited partners' unit:
 
 
 
Basic common unit
$ (0.38)
$ (1.12)
$ 1.44 
Diluted common unit
$ (0.38)
$ (1.12)
$ 1.40 
Basic and diluted senior subordinated series D unit
 
 
$ 8.85 
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
Statement of Income and Comprehensive Income [Abstract]
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$ (2,390)
$ (25,829)
$ 104,466 
Hedging (gains) losses reclassified to earnings
1,965 
2,085 
(2,412)
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives
(1,609)
(274)
(3,368)
Comprehensive income (loss)
(2,034)
(24,018)
98,686 
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interest
48 
(19)
(60)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Crosstex Energy, L.P.
$ (1,986)
$ (24,037)
$ 98,626 
Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Current assets:
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$ 24,143 
$ 17,697 
Accounts receivable:
 
 
Trade, net of allowance for bad debts of $405 and $163, respectively
22,680 
16,217 
Accrued revenues
140,023 
190,726 
Imbalances
1,658 
2,920 
Other
1,434 
156 
Fair value of derivative assets
2,867 
5,523 
Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other
9,951 
9,741 
Total current assets
202,756 
242,980 
Property, Plant and Equipment [Abstract]
 
 
Transmission assets
384,959 
383,651 
Gathering systems
656,407 
623,451 
Gas plants
494,365 
461,865 
Other property and equipment
56,976 
54,743 
Construction in process
55,467 
20,709 
Total property and equipment
1,648,174 
1,544,419 
Accumulated depreciation
(406,273)
(329,315)
Total property and equipment, net
1,241,901 
1,215,104 
Fair value of derivative assets
1,169 
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $199,248 and $151,735, respectively
451,462 
498,975 
Investment in limited liability company
35,000 
Other assets, net
24,212 
26,712 
Total assets
1,955,331 
1,984,940 
Liabilities, Current [Abstract]
 
 
Drafts payable
6,005 
151 
Accounts payable
14,197 
15,988 
Accrued gas purchases
106,232 
160,909 
Accrued imbalances payable
2,348 
1,889 
Fair value of derivative liabilities
5,587 
7,980 
Current portion of long-term debt
7,058 
Accrued interest
24,918 
28,843 
Other current liabilities
66,065 
37,802 
Total current liabilities
225,352 
260,620 
Long-term debt
798,409 
711,512 
Other long-term liabilities
23,919 
26,879 
Deferred tax liability
7,192 
7,837 
Fair value of derivative liabilities
1,156 
Commitments and contingencies
Partners' equity:
 
 
Common unitholders (50,676,945 and 50,254,875 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)
730,010 
807,020 
Preferred unitholders (14,705,882 units issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010)
147,770 
146,888 
General partner interest (2% interest with 1,325,730 and 1,325,730 equivalent units outstanding at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively)
20,322 
20,979 
Non-controlling interest
2,860 
2,908 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
(503)
(859)
Total partners' equity
900,459 
976,936 
Total liabilities and partners' equity
$ 1,955,331 
$ 1,984,940 
Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Partners' Equity:
 
 
Common Unitholders
50,676,945 
50,254,875 
Preferred unitholders
14,705,882 
14,705,882 
General partners interest
1,334,343 
1,324,730 
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
 
 
Allowance for trade and other receivables
$ 405 
$ 163 
Accumulated amortization of intangible assets
$ 199,248 
$ 151,735 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2011
Dec. 31, 2010
Dec. 31, 2009
Statement of Cash Flows [Abstract]
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$ (2,390)
$ (25,829)
$ 104,466 
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities [Abstract]
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
125,284 
111,551 
129,737 
Non-cash stock-based compensation
7,308 
9,276 
8,742 
(Gain) loss on sale of property
264 
(13,881)
(184,412)
Impairments
1,311 
2,894 
Deferred tax benefit
(645)
(396)
(468)
Derivatives mark to market interest rate settlement
(24,160)
Non-cash portion of derivatives loss
761 
1,136 
2,184 
Non-cash portion of loss on debt extinguishment
5,396 
4,669 
Interest paid-in-kind
(11,558)
10,134 
Amortization of debt issue costs
6,462 
6,680 
11,812 
Amortization of discount on notes
1,897 
1,686 
Increase (Decrease) in Operating Capital [Abstract]
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, accrued revenue and other
44,225 
4,653 
128,083 
Natural gas and natural gas liquids, prepaid expenses and other
(1,532)
2,414 
(5,300)
Accounts payable, accrued gas purchases and other accrued liabilities
(38,062)
18,908 
(131,563)
Net cash provided by operating activities
143,572 
87,187 
80,978 
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities [Abstract]
 
 
 
Additions to property and equipment
(97,572)
(48,191)
(101,370)
Insurance recoveries on property and equipment
2,599 
12,458 
Acquisitions and asset purchases
(35,142)
Proceeds from sale of property
478 
60,230 
503,928 
Investment in limited liability company
(35,000)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
(132,094)
14,638 
379,874 
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities [Abstract]
 
 
 
Proceeds from borrowings
471,250 
997,412 
632,807 
Payments on borrowings
(393,308)
(1,144,706)
(1,050,389)
Proceeds from capital lease obligations
1,695 
Payments on capital lease obligations
(3,123)
(2,385)
(2,414)
Increase (decrease) in drafts payable
5,854 
(5,063)
(16,300)
Debt refinancing costs
(3,954)
(28,561)
(15,031)
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes
(1,798)
(2,659)
(232)
Distributions to non-controlling interest
(345)
(336)
Distribution to partners
(80,706)
(23,082)
(11,597)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred units
120,785 
Proceeds from exercise of unit options
590 
890 
67 
Contributions from partners
163 
2,807 
21 
Net cash used in financing activities
(5,032)
(84,907)
(461,709)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
6,446 
16,918 
(857)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
17,697 
779 
1,636 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
24,143 
17,697 
779 
Cash paid for interest
71,950 
66,081 
91,454 
Cash paid for income taxes
$ 1,104 
$ 1,688 
$ 1,376 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners' Equity (USD $)
In Thousands
Total
Common Stock [Member]
Preferred Stock [Member]
Senior Subordinated Units [Member]
General Partner [Member]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) [Member]
Noncontrolling Interest [Member]
Balance, at Dec. 31, 2008
$ 797,931 
$ 674,564 
$ 0 
$ 99,942 
$ 16,805 
$ 3,110 
$ 3,510 
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2008
 
44,909 
3,875 
996 
 
 
Issuance of preferred units
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from exercise of unit options
67 
67 
Proceeds from exercise of unit options (Shares)
 
 
 
Conversion of subordinated units
 
99,942 
(99,942)
Conversion of subordinated units (Units)
 
4,069 
(3,875)
 
 
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes
(232)
(232)
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes (units)
 
183 
 
 
Capital contributions
21 
21 
Capital contributions (Units)
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation
8,742 
5,660 
3,082 
Distribution to partners
(11,597)
(11,368)
(229)
Net income (loss)
104,466 
105,225 
(819)
60 
Hedging (gains) losses reclassified to earnings
(2,412)
(2,412)
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives
(3,368)
(3,368)
Distribution to non-controlling interest
(336)
(336)
Balance, at Dec. 31, 2009
893,282 
873,858 
18,860 
(2,670)
3,234 
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2009
 
49,163 
1,003 
 
 
Issuance of preferred units
120,785 
120,785 
Issuance of preferred units (Units)
 
 
14,706 
 
 
 
 
Beneficial conversion feature attributable to preferred units
(22,279)
22,279 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from exercise of unit options
890 
890 
Proceeds from exercise of unit options (Shares)
 
199 
 
 
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes
(2,659)
(2,659)
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes (units)
 
893 
 
 
Capital contributions
2,807 
2,807 
Capital contributions (Units)
 
322 
 
 
Stock-based compensation
9,276 
5,262 
4,014 
Distribution to partners
(23,082)
(12,825)
(9,926)
(331)
Net income (loss)
(25,829)
(35,227)
13,750 
(4,371)
19 
Hedging (gains) losses reclassified to earnings
2,085 
2,085 
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives
(274)
(274)
Distribution to non-controlling interest
(345)
(345)
Balance, at Dec. 31, 2010
976,936 
807,020 
146,888 
20,979 
(859)
2,908 
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2010
 
50,255 
14,706 
1,325 
 
 
Issuance of preferred units
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from exercise of unit options
590 
590 
Proceeds from exercise of unit options (Shares)
 
128 
 
 
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes
(1,798)
(1,798)
Conversion of restricted units for common units, net of units withheld for taxes (units)
 
294 
 
 
Capital contributions
163 
163 
Capital contributions (Units)
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation
7,308 
4,105 
3,203 
Distribution to partners
(80,706)
(60,209)
(17,206)
(3,291)
Net income (loss)
(2,390)
(19,698)
18,088 
(732)
(48)
Hedging (gains) losses reclassified to earnings
1,965 
1,965 
Adjustment in fair value of derivatives
(1,609)
(1,609)
Distribution to non-controlling interest
Balance, at Dec. 31, 2011
$ 900,459 
$ 730,010 
$ 147,770 
$ 0 
$ 20,322 
$ (503)
$ 2,860 
Balance (Shares) at Dec. 31, 2011
 
50,677 
14,706 
1,334 
 
 
Organization and Summary of Significant Agreement
Organization and Summary of Significant Agreements
CROSSTEX ENERGY, L.P.

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
December 31, 2011 and 2010
 

(1) Organization and Summary of Significant Agreements

 

(a)       Description of Business

 

Crosstex Energy, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 12, 2002, is engaged in the gathering, transmission, processing and marketing of natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs). The Partnership connects the wells of natural gas producers in the geographic areas of its gathering systems in order to gather for a fee or purchase the gas production, processes natural gas for the removal of NGLs, transports natural gas and NGLs and ultimately provides natural gas and NGLs to a variety of markets. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas and NGLs from producers not connected to its gathering systems for resale and markets natural gas and NGLs on behalf of producers for a fee. We recently added crude oil terminal facilities in south Louisiana to provide access for crude oil producers to the premium markets in this area.

 

(b) Partnership Ownership

 

Crosstex Energy GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Crosstex Energy, Inc. (CEI). As of December 31, 2011, CEI owns 16,414,830 common units in the Partnership through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2011, CEI owned 25.0% of the limited partner interests (including common and preferred interests) in the Partnership and its 2.0% of the general partner's interest.

 

(c) Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Partnership proportionately consolidates its undivided 50.0% interest in a gas processing plant invested in by the Partnership in July 2011, and its undivided 64.29% interest in a gas plant acquired by the Partnership in November 2005 (23.85%), in May 2006 (35.42%) and June 2011 (5.02%). In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 810-10-05-8, the Partnership consolidates its joint venture interest in Crosstex DC Gathering, J.V. (CDC) as discussed more fully in Note 2(f). The consolidated operations are hereafter referred to herein collectively as the “Partnership.” All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Significant Accounting Policies
Significant Accounting Policies

(2) Significant Accounting Policies

 

(a) Management's Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management of the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

 

(b) Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

 

(c) Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Inventory

 

The Partnership's inventories of products consist of natural gas and NGLs. The Partnership reports these assets at the lower of cost or market.

 

(d) Property, Plant, and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment consist of intrastate gas transmission systems, gas gathering systems, NGL pipelines, natural gas processing plants and NGL fractionation plants. Gas required to maintain pipeline minimum pressures is capitalized and classified as property, plant and equipment. Other property and equipment is primarily comprised of computer software and equipment, furniture, fixtures, leasehold improvements and office equipment. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Repairs and maintenance are charged against income when incurred. Renewals and betterments, which extend the useful life of the properties, are capitalized. Interest costs are capitalized to property, plant and equipment during the period the assets are undergoing preparation for intended use. Interest costs totaling $0.9 million, $0.1 million and $1.1 million were capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful life of each asset, as follows:

 

  Useful Lives
Transmission assets 20-30 years
Gathering systems 15-20 years
Gas processing plants 20 years
Other property and equipment 3-15 years

Depreciation expense of $77.8 million, $75.7 million and $82.4 million was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Depreciation expense also includes the amortization of assets classified as capital lease assets.

 

FASB ASC 360-10-05-4 requires long-lived assets to be reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. In order to determine whether an impairment has occurred, the Partnership compares the net book value of the asset to the undiscounted expected future net cash flows. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of such impairment is determined based on the expected future net cash flows discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the asset.

 

When determining whether impairment of one of our long-lived assets has occurred, the Partnership must estimate the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the asset. The Partnership's estimate of cash flows is based on assumptions regarding the purchase and resale margins on natural gas, volume of gas available to the asset, markets available to the asset, operating expenses, and future natural gas prices and NGL product prices. The amount of availability of gas to an asset is sometimes based on assumptions regarding future drilling activity, which may be dependent in part on natural gas prices. Projections of gas volumes and future commodity prices are inherently subjective and contingent upon a number of variable factors. Any significant variance in any of the above assumptions or factors could materially affect our cash flows, which could require us to record an impairment of an asset.

 

The Partnership recorded impairments to long-lived assets of $1.3 million and $2.9 million during the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See Note 3(c) for further details on the long-lived assets impaired.

 

(e) Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets consist of customer relationships and the value of the dedicated and non-dedicated acreage attributable to pipeline, gathering and processing systems. Intangible assets associated with customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefits of the customer relationships, which range from three to 15 years. The intangible assets associated with dedicated and non-dedicated acreage attributable to pipeline, gathering and processing systems are being amortized using the units of throughput method of amortization.

 

The following table represents the Partnership's total purchased intangible assets at years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):

 

           
   Gross Carrying Accumulated Net Carrying
   Amount Amortization Amount
2011         
Customer relationships $255,058 $(101,762) $153,296
Dedicated and non-dedicated acreage  395,652  (97,486)  298,166
 Total $650,710 $(199,248) $451,462
2010         
Customer relationships $255,058 $(86,524) $168,534
Dedicated and non-dedicated acreage  395,652  (65,211)  330,441
 Total $650,710 $(151,735) $498,975

The weighted average amortization period for intangible assets is 18.0 years. Amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $47.5 million, $35.9 million and $36.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

The following table summarizes the Partnership's estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years (in thousands):

 

2012  $44,995
2013   41,786
2014   40,578
2015   41,296
2016   41,880
Thereafter  240,927
Total $451,462

(f) Investment in Limited Partnership

 

The Partnership owns a majority interest in Crosstex Denton County Joint Venture (CDC) and consolidates its investment in CDC pursuant to FASB ASC 810-10-05-8. The Partnership manages the business affairs of CDC, which owns a small gas gathering system in north Texas. The other joint venture partner (the CDC partner) is an unrelated third party who owns and operates a natural gas field located in Denton County, Texas.

 

(g) Investment in Limited Liability Company

On June 22, 2011, the Partnership entered into a limited liability agreement with Howard Energy Partners (“HEP”) for an initial capital contribution of $35.0 million in exchange for an individual ownership interest in HEP of approximately 35.0%. In addition to the Partnership's contribution, an unrelated party also provided a capital contribution of $35.0 million for a 35.0% ownership interest in HEP with HEP management and a few private investors owning the remaining 30.0% interest. HEP owns assets and provides midstream and construction services to Eagle Ford Shale producers in south Texas. This investment in HEP is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is reflected on the balance sheet as “Investment in limited liability company.” Per the terms of the agreement, the Partnership will not recognize any income from this investment until HEP's income exceeds approximately $9.9 million on an inception to date basis due to preferred interests owned by HEP management. If HEP has losses on an inception to date basis, the Partnership will recognize 39.3% of the losses.

 

(h) Other Assets

 

Unamortized debt issuance costs totaling $24.2 million and $26.7 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are included in other assets, net. Debt issuance costs are amortized into interest expense using the straight-line method over the terms of the debt.

 

(i) Gas Imbalance Accounting

 

Quantities of natural gas and NGLs over-delivered or under-delivered related to imbalance agreements are recorded monthly as receivables or payables using weighted average prices at the time of the imbalance. These imbalances are typically settled with deliveries of natural gas or NGLs. The Partnership had imbalance payables of $2.3 million and $1.9 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which approximate the fair value of these imbalances. The Partnership had imbalance receivables of $1.7 million and $2.9 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, which are carried at the lower of cost or market value.

 

(j) Asset Retirement Obligations

 

FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 was issued in March 2005, which became effective at December 31, 2005. FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in FASB ASC 410-20, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Since the obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional, FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 provides that a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement activity should be recognized if that fair value can be reasonably estimated, even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation under FASB ASC 410-20. The Partnership did not provide any asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 because it does not have sufficient information as set forth in FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 to reasonably estimate such obligations, and the Partnership has no current intention of discontinuing use of any significant assets.

 

(k) Revenue Recognition

 

The Partnership recognizes revenue for sales or services at the time the natural gas or NGLs are delivered or at the time the service is performed. The Partnership generally accrues one month of sales and the related gas purchases and reverses these accruals when the sales and purchases are actually invoiced and recorded in the subsequent months. Actual results could differ from the accrual estimates. The Partnership's purchase and sale arrangements are generally reported in revenues and costs on a gross basis in the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with FASB ASC 605-45-45-1. Except for fee based arrangements, the Partnership acts as the principal in these purchase and sale transactions, has the risk and reward of ownership as evidenced by title transfer, schedules the transportation and assumes credit risk. We conduct “off-system” gas marketing operations as a service to producers on systems that we do not own. We refer to these activities as part of energy trading activities. In some cases, we earn an agency fee from the producer for arranging the marketing of the producer's natural gas. In other cases, we purchase the natural gas from the producer and enter into a sales contract with another party to sell the natural gas. The revenue and cost of sales for these activities are included in revenue on a net basis in the consolidated statement of operations.

 

The Partnership accounts for taxes collected from customers attributable to revenue transactions and remitted to government authorities on a net basis (excluded from revenues).

 

(l) Derivatives

 

The Partnership uses derivatives to hedge against changes in cash flows related to product price, as opposed to their use for trading purposes. FASB ASC 815 requires that all derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. We generally determine the fair value of futures contracts and swap contracts based on the difference between the derivative's fixed contract price and the underlying market price at the determination date. The asset or liability related to the derivative instruments is recorded on the balance sheet in fair value of derivative assets or liabilities.

 

Realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity related derivatives that are not designated as hedges, as well as the ineffective portion of hedge derivatives, are recorded as gain or loss on derivatives in the consolidated statement of operations. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on interest rate derivatives that are not designated as hedges are included in interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Unrealized gains and losses on effective cash flow hedge derivatives are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. When the hedged transaction occurs, the realized gain or loss on the hedge derivative is transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings. Realized gains and losses on commodity hedge derivatives are recognized in revenues, and realized gains and losses on interest hedge derivatives are recorded as adjustments to interest expense. Settlements of derivatives are included in cash flows from operating activities.

 

(m ) Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Comprehensive income includes net income (loss) and other comprehensive income, which includes unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments. Pursuant to FASB ASC 815, the Partnership records deferred hedge gains and losses on its derivative financial instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges as other comprehensive income.

 

(n) Legal Costs Expected to be Incurred in Connection with a Loss Contingency

 

Legal costs incurred in connection with a loss contingency are expensed as incurred.

 

(o) Concentrations of Credit Risk

 

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Partnership to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts receivable and derivative financial instruments. Management believes the risk is limited since the Partnership's customers represent a broad and diverse group of energy marketers and end users. In addition, the Partnership continually monitors and reviews credit exposure to its marketing counter-parties and letters of credit or other appropriate security are obtained as considered necessary to limit the risk of loss. The Partnership records reserves for uncollectible accounts on a specific identification basis since there is not a large volume of late paying customers. The Partnership had a reserve for uncollectible receivables as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 of $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Partnership had only one customer that represented greater than 10.0% individually of its revenue. The customer is located in the LIG segment and represented 12.3% of the consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2010, three customers accounted for 14.5%, 10.6%, 10.2% of consolidated revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2009, one customer accounted for 12.2% of the consolidated revenue including discontinued operations. As the Partnership continues to grow and expand, the relationship between individual customer sales and consolidated total sales is expected to continue to change. While these customers represent a significant percentage of revenues, the loss of these customers would not have a material adverse impact on the Partnership's results of operations because the gross operating margin received from transactions with these customers are not material to the Partnership's gross operating margin.

(p) Environmental Costs

 

Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized as appropriate, depending on the nature of the expenditures and their future economic benefit. Expenditures that related to an existing condition caused by past operations that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded on an undiscounted basis (or a discounted basis when the obligation can be settled at fixed and determinable amounts) when environmental assessments or clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, such expenditures were not significant.

 

(q) Share-Based Awards

 

The Partnership recognizes compensation cost related to all stock-based awards, including stock options, in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The Partnership and CEI each have similar unit or share-based payment plans for employees, which are described below. Share-based compensation associated with the CEI share-based compensation plans awarded to officers and employees of the Partnership are recorded by the Partnership since CEI has no operating activities other than its interest in the Partnership. Amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements with respect to these plans are as follows (in thousands):

 

           
   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
Cost of share-based compensation charged to general and         
 administrative expense $6,157 $7,953 $7,075
Cost of share-based compensation charged to operating expense   1,151  1,323  1,667
Total amount charged to income  $7,308 $9,276 $8,742
           

The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model as disclosed in Note 9 — Employee Incentive Plans.

 

(r) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

We have reviewed recently issued accounting pronouncements that became effective during the year ended December 31, 2011, and have determined that none would have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Discountinued Operations, Impairment and Disposition
Discountinued Operations, Impairment and Disposition

(3) Discontinued Operations, Impairments and Dispositions

 

(a) Discontinued Operations

 

The Partnership sold its midstream assets in Alabama, Mississippi and south Texas for $217.6 million in August 2009. Sales proceeds, net of transaction costs and other obligations associated with the sale, of $212.0 million were used to repay long-term indebtedness and the Partnership recognized a gain on sale of $97.2 million. In October 2009, the Partnership sold its Treating assets for net proceeds of $265.4 million. Sales proceeds, net of transaction costs and other obligations associated with the sale, of $258.1 million were used to repay long-term indebtedness and the Partnership recognized a gain on sale of $86.3 million.

 

The revenues, operating expenses, general and administrative expenses associated directly with the sold assets, depreciation and amortization expense, Treating inventory impairment of $1.0 million during 2009, allocated Texas margin tax and an allocated interest expense related to the operations of the sold assets have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations for all periods. Interest expense of $34.4 million for the year ended 2009 was allocated to discontinued operations related to the debt repaid from the proceeds from the asset dispositions using average historical interest rates for each of the three years. The interest allocation for 2009 also included make-whole interest payments and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs related to the debt repaid. No corporate office general and administrative expenses have been allocated to income from discontinued operations. Following are revenues and income from discontinued operations (in thousands):

 

  Year ended December 31 
  2009 
Midstream revenues  $327,242 
Treating revenues  $45,534 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  $(1,796) 
Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of tax $183,747 

(b) Other Disposition

 

The Partnership disposed of assets that were not considered discontinued operations in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. The 2010 disposition was related to assets in east Texas for a gain of $14.0 million. The 2009 disposition was related to the Arkoma gathering assets in Oklahoma.

 

(c) Long-Lived Assets Impairments

 

Impairments of $1.3 million and $2.9 million were recorded in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to long-lived assets. Impairments during 2009 totaling $2.9 million were taken on the Bear Creek processing plant and the Vermillion treating plant to bring the fair value of the plants to a marketable value for these idle assets. The impairment in 2010 primarily relates to the write down of certain excess pipe inventory prior to its sale.

 

Potential Changes in Sabine Plant during 2012. Currently, our Sabine plant has a contract with a third-party to fractionate the raw-make NGLs produced by the plant. We have been unsuccessful in renewing this contract, which expires on March 1, 2012. We have an interim solution to continue to provide for fractionation of the NGLs produced by the Sabine plant. Ultimately, we plan to connect the Sabine gas supply to our Eunice plant, which can process the gas and fractionate the produced NGLs. If this processing change is made, we will likely cease operating the Sabine plant. Although we do not have specific plans at this time to relocate the Sabine plant once it is idled, we may consider it for utilization elsewhere in our operations. The net book value of the Sabine plant was $34.0 million as of December 31, 2011. If the plant is idled on a long-term basis as contemplated above, an impairment may be recorded to expense the non-recoverable costs associated with the plant's current location, which are estimated to be less than $15.0 million based on the net book value as of December 31, 2011.

 

 

Long-Term Debt
Long-Term Debt

(4) Long-Term Debt

 

As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

   2011 2010
Bank credit facility (due 2016), interest based on Prime and/or LIBOR plus an applicable      
 margin, interest rate at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 2.9% and 4.0%, respectively $ 85,000 $ -
Senior unsecured notes, net of discount of $11.6 million and $13.5 million, respectively,       
 which bear interest at the rate of 8.875%   713,409   711,512
Series B secured note assumed in the Eunice transaction, which bore interest at the rate of      
 9.5%   -   7,058
     798,409   718,570
Less current portion    -   (7,058)
 Debt classified as long-term  $ 798,409 $ 711,512

 

Maturities. Maturities for the long-term debt as of December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):

2012 $ -
2013   -
2014   -
2015   -
2016   85,000
Thereafter  725,000
Subtotal  810,000
Less discount  (11,591)
Total outstanding debt$ 798,409
   

Credit Facility. The Partnership made three amendments to its bank credit facility in May 2011, July 2011 and January 2012. The amendments contained the following changes:

  • Increased borrowing capacity from $420.0 million to $635.0 million;
  • Extended maturity from February 2014 to May 2016;
  • Increased the maximum permitted leverage ratio to 5.00 to 1.00;
  • Decreased the minimum consolidated interest rate coverage ratio during certain fiscal quarters;
  • Decreased the interest rates;
  • Permitted Apache Midstream LLC (“Apache”) to have a first priority lien on certain assets that are the subject of a joint interest arrangement between Apache and Crosstex Permian, LLC (“Permian”);
  • Increased the Partnership's ability to make investments in joint ventures and subsidiaries without such joint ventures and subsidiaries becoming guarantors under the credit agreement; and

  • Allowed the Partnership to use multiple banks as letter of credit issuers.

 

As of December 31, 2011, there was $85.0 million of borrowing and $69.0 million in outstanding letters of credit, under the bank credit facility leaving approximately $331.0 million available for future borrowing based on a borrowing capacity of $485.0 million. Based on the January amendment to increase the credit facility borrowing capacity to $635.0 million and borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2011, the Partnership's available borrowing would be $481.0 million.

 

The credit facility is guaranteed by substantially all of the Partnership's subsidiaries and is secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the Partnership's assets and those of the guarantors, including all material pipeline, gas gathering and processing assets, all material working capital assets and a pledge of all of the Partnership's equity interests in substantially all of its subsidiaries.

 

The Partnership may prepay all loans under the credit facility at any time without premium or penalty (other than customary LIBOR breakage costs), subject to certain notice requirements. The credit facility requires mandatory prepayments of amounts outstanding thereunder with the net proceeds of certain asset sales, extraordinary receipts, equity issuances and debt incurrences, but these mandatory prepayments do not require any reduction of the lenders' commitments under the credit facility.

 

Under the credit facility, borrowings bear interest at the Partnership's option at the Eurodollar Rate (the British Bankers Association LIBOR Rate) plus an applicable margin or the Base Rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, the 30-day Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%, or the administrative agent's prime rate) plus an applicable margin. The Partnership pays a per annum fee on all letters of credit issued under the credit facility and a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the unused availability under the credit facility. The letter of credit fee and the applicable margins for the interest rate vary quarterly based on the Partnership's leverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, being generally computed as the ratio of total funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges, or adjusted EBITDA) and are as follows:

 

 

  Base Rate  Eurodollar Rate Letter of Credit
Leverage Ratio  Loans Loans  Fees
Greater than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00 2.00 %  3.00 %  3.00 %
Greater than or equal to 4.00 to 1.00 and less than 4.50 to 1.00   1.75 %  2.75 %  2.75 %
Greater than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00 and less than 4.00 to 1.00   1.50 %  2.50 %  2.50 %
Greater than or equal to 3.00 to 1.00 and less than 3.50 to 1.00 1.25 %  2.25%  2.25%
Less than 3.00 to 1.00   1.00 %  2.00 %  2.00 %

Based on our forecasted leverage ratio of 4.00 to 1.00 for 2012, we expect the margin for the interest rate and letter of credit fee to be in line with the applicable rates above. The credit facility does not have a floor for the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate.

 

The amended credit facility includes financial covenants that are tested on a quarterly basis, based on the rolling four-quarter period that ends on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The maximum permitted leverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, but generally computed as the ratio of total secured funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges) is 5.00 to 1.00. The minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, but generally computed as the ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges to consolidated interest charges) is as follows:

 

  • 2.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarters ending March 31, 2012 through June 30, 2013;

     

  • 2.50 to 1.00 for September 30, 2013 and each fiscal quarter thereafter.

 

In addition, the credit facility contains various covenants that, among other restrictions, limit our ability to:

 

  • grant or assume liens;

     

  • make investments;

     

  • incur or assume indebtedness;

     

  • engage in mergers or acquisitions;

     

  • sell, transfer, assign or convey assets;

     

  • repurchase our equity, make distributions and certain other restricted payments;

     

  • change the nature of our business;

     

  • engage in transactions with affiliates;

     

  • enter into certain burdensome agreements;

     

  • make certain amendments to the omnibus agreement, or the Partnership's subsidiaries' organizational documents;

     

  • prepay the senior unsecured notes and certain other indebtedness; and

     

  • enter into certain hedging contracts.

 

The credit facility permits the Partnership to make quarterly distributions to unitholders so long as no default exists under the credit facility.

 

Each of the following is an event of default under the credit facility:

 

  • failure to pay any principal, interest, fees, expenses or other amounts when due;

     

  • failure to meet the quarterly financial covenants;

     

  • failure to observe any other agreement, obligation, or covenant in the credit facility or any related loan document, subject to cure periods for certain failures;

     

  • the failure of any representation or warranty to be materially true and correct when made;

     

  • our or any of our subsidiaries default under other indebtedness that exceeds a threshold amount;

     

  • judgments against us or any of our material subsidiaries, in excess of a threshold amount;

     

  • certain ERISA events involving us or any of our material subsidiaries, in excess of a threshold amount;

     

  • bankruptcy or other insolvency events involving us or any of our material subsidiaries; and

     

  • a change in control (as defined in the credit facility).

 

If an event of default relating to bankruptcy or other insolvency events occurs, all indebtedness under the credit facility will immediately become due and payable. If any other event of default exists under the credit facility, the lenders may accelerate the maturity of the obligations outstanding under the credit facility and exercise other rights and remedies. In addition, if any event of default exists under the credit facility, the lenders may commence foreclosure or other actions against the collateral.

 

If any default occurs under the credit facility, or if the Partnership is unable to make any of the representations and warranties in the credit facility, the Partnership will be unable to borrow funds or have letters of credit issued under the credit facility.

 

The Partnership expects to be in compliance with the covenants in the credit facility for at least the next twelve months.

Series B Secured Note. On October 20, 2009, the Partnership acquired the Eunice natural gas liquids processing plant and fractionation facility which included an $18.1 million series B secured note. We paid $11.0 million of principal on the series B secured note in May 2010 and paid the remaining $7.1 million in May 2011.

 

Senior Unsecured Notes. On February 10, 2010, we issued $725.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior unsecured notes (the “notes”) due on February 15, 2018 at an issue price of 97.907% to yield 9.25% to maturity including the original issue discount (OID). Net proceeds from the sale of the notes of $689.7 million (net of transaction costs and OID), together with borrowings under the credit facility discussed above, were used to repay in full amounts outstanding under the prior bank credit facility and senior secured notes and to pay related fees, costs and expenses, including the settlement of interest rate swaps associated with the prior credit facility. Interest payments on the notes are due semi-annually in arrears in February and August.

 

The indenture governing the notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Partnership's ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to:

 

  • sell assets including equity interests in its subsidiaries;

     

  • pay distributions on, redeem or repurchase units or redeem or repurchase its subordinated debt (as discussed in more detail below);

     

  • make investments;

     

  • incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred units;

     

  • create or incur certain liens;

     

  • enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other payments from its restricted subsidiaries to the Partnership;

     

  • consolidate, merge or transfer all or substantially all of its assets;

     

  • engage in transactions with affiliates;

     

  • create unrestricted subsidiaries;

     

  • enter into sale and leaseback transactions; or

     

  • engage in certain business activities.

 

The indenture provides that if the Partnership's fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of consolidated cash flow to fixed charges, which generally represents the ratio of adjusted EBITDA to interest charges with further adjustments as defined per the indenture) for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters is not less than 2.0 to 1.0, the Partnership will be permitted to pay distributions to its unitholders in an amount equal to available cash from operating surplus (each as defined in our partnership agreement) with respect to its preceding fiscal quarter plus a number of items, including the net cash proceeds received by the Partnership as a capital contribution or from the issuance of equity interests since the date of the indenture, to the extent not previously expended. If the Partnership's fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 2.0 to 1.0, the Partnership will be able to pay distributions to its unitholders in an amount equal to an $80.0 million basket (less amounts previously expended pursuant to such basket), plus the same number of items discussed in the preceding sentence to the extent not previously expended. The Partnership was in compliance with this ratio as of December 31, 2011.

 

If the notes achieve an investment grade rating from each of Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, many of the covenants discussed above will terminate. Our current ratings on our bonds from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Rating Services are B1 and B+, respectively.

 

The Partnership may redeem up to 35% of the notes at any time prior to February 15, 2013 with the cash proceeds from equity offerings at a redemption price of 108.875% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date) provided that:

 

  • at least 65% of the aggregate principal amount of the senior notes remains outstanding immediately after the occurrence of such redemption; and

     

  • the redemption occurs within 120 days of the date of the closing of the equity offering.

 

Prior to February 15, 2014, the Partnership may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at a “make-whole” redemption price. On or after February 15, 2014, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 104.438% for the twelve-month period beginning on February 15, 2014, 102.219% for the twelve-month period beginning February 15, 2015 and 100.00% for the twelve-month period beginning on February 15, 2016 and at any time thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date on the notes.

 

Each of the following is an event of default under the indenture:

 

  • failure to pay any principal or interest when due;

     

  • failure to observe any other agreement, obligation, or other covenant in the indenture, subject to the cure periods for certain failures;

     

  • the Partnership or any of its subsidiaries' default under other indebtedness that exceeds a certain threshold amount;

     

  • failures by the Partnership or any of its subsidiaries to pay final judgments that exceed a certain threshold amount; and

     

  • bankruptcy or other insolvency events involving the Partnership or any of its material subsidiaries.

 

If an event of default relating to bankruptcy or other insolvency events occurs, the senior unsecured notes will immediately become due and payable. If any other event of default exists under the indenture, the trustee under the indenture or the holders of the senior unsecured notes may accelerate the maturity of the senior unsecured notes and exercise other rights and remedies.

 

Non Guarantors. The senior unsecured notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by each of the Partnership's current material subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”), with the exception of our regulated Louisiana subsidiaries (which may only guarantee up to $500.0 million of the Partnership's debt), CDC (our joint venture in Denton County, Texas not 100% owned by the Partnership) and Crosstex Energy Finance Corporation (a wholly owned Delaware corporation that was organized for the sole purpose of being a co-issuer of certain of the Partnership's indebtedness, including the senior unsecured notes). Guarantors may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their properties or assets to, or consolidate with or merge into another company if such a sale would cause a default under the terms of the senior unsecured notes. Since certain wholly owned subsidiaries do not guarantee the senior unsecured notes, the condensed consolidating financial statements of the guarantors and non-guarantors as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are disclosed below in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X.

 

 Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
 December 31, 2011
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
ASSETS            
Total current assets  $189,410 $13,346 $ - $202,756
Property, plant and equipment, net   1,026,537  215,364   -  1,241,901
Total other assets   510,671  3   -  510,674
 Total assets  $1,726,618 $228,713 $ - $1,955,331
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL            
Total current liabilities  $220,811 $4,541 $ - $225,352
Long-term debt   798,409   -   -  798,409
Other long-term liabilities   31,111   -   -  31,111
Partners’ capital   676,287  224,172   -  900,459
 Total liabilities & partners’ capital  $1,726,618 $228,713 $ - $1,955,331

 December 31, 2010
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
ASSETS            
Total current assets  $229,997 $12,983 $ - $242,980
Property, plant and equipment, net   987,018  228,086   -  1,215,104
Total other assets   526,853  3   -  526,856
 Total assets  $1,743,868 $241,072 $ - $1,984,940
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL            
Total current liabilities  $254,460 $6,160 $ - $260,620
Long-term debt   711,512   -   -  711,512
Other long-term liabilities   35,872   -   -  35,872
Partners’ capital   742,024  234,912   -  976,936
 Total liabilities & partners’ capital  $1,743,868 $241,072 $ - $1,984,940

 Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
              
Total revenues $1,954,612 $86,577 $(27,247) $2,013,942
Total operating costs and expenses  (1,925,234)  (38,693)  27,247  (1,936,680)
 Operating income   29,378  47,884  0  77,262
Interest expense, net  (79,230)  (3)  0  (79,233)
Other income  707  0  0  707
Income (loss) from continuing operations            
 before non-controlling interest and            
 income taxes  (49,145)  47,881  0  (1,264)
Income tax provision  (1,110)  (16)  0  (1,126)
Income from discontinued operations,            
Less: Net loss attributable to            
 non-controlling interest  0  (48)  0  (48)
Net income (loss) attributable to            
 Crosstex Energy, L.P. $(50,255) $47,913 $0 $(2,342)

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
              
Total revenues $1,733,273 $84,028 $(24,625) $1,792,676
Total operating costs and expenses  (1,704,250)  (36,306)  24,625  (1,715,931)
 Operating income   29,023  47,722  0  76,745
Interest expense, net  (87,029)  (6)  0  (87,035)
Other loss  (14,418)  0  0  (14,418)
Income (loss) from continuing operations            
 before non-controlling interest and            
 income taxes  (72,424)  47,716  0  (24,708)
Income tax provision  (1,110)  (11)  0  (1,121)
Income from discontinued operations,            
Less: Net income attributable to            
 non-controlling interest  0  19  0  19
Net income (loss) attributable to            
 Crosstex Energy, L.P. $(73,534) $47,686 $0 $(25,848)

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
              
Total revenues $1,541,854 $75,048 $(33,351) $1,583,551
Total operating costs and expenses  (1,562,084)  (32,166)  33,351  (1,560,899)
 Operating income (loss)  (20,230)  42,882  0  22,652
Interest expense, net  (95,078)  0  0  (95,078)
Other loss  (3,269)  0  0  (3,269)
Income (loss) from continuing operations            
 before non-controlling interest and            
 income taxes  (118,577)  42,882  0  (75,695)
Income tax provision  (1,770)  (20)  0  (1,790)
Income from discontinued operations,            
 net of tax  181,951  0  0  181,951
Less: Net income attributable to            
 non-controlling interest  0  60  0  60
Net income attributable to            
 Crosstex Energy, L.P. $61,604 $42,802 $0 $104,406

Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
              
Net cash flows provided by             
 operating activities $81,883 $61,689 $0 $143,572
Net cash flows used in            
 investing activities $(129,806) $(2,288) $0 $(132,094)
Net cash flows provided by (used in)            
 financing activities $(5,032) $(58,606) $58,606 $(5,032)

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2010
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
              
Net cash flows provided by            
 operating activities $28,208 $58,979 $0 $87,187
Net cash flows provided by (used in)            
 investing activities $21,353 $(6,715) $0 $14,638
Net cash flows provided by (used in)            
 financing activities $(84,562) $(52,501) $52,156 $(84,907)

 For the Year Ended December 31, 2009
              
   Guarantors  Non Guarantors  Elimination  Consolidated
              
    (in thousands)
              
Net cash flows provided by            
 operating activities $31,194 $49,784 $ - $80,978
Net cash flows provided by (used in)            
 investing activities $402,464 $(22,590) $ - $379,874
Net cash flows provided by (used in)            
 financing activities $(461,372) $(27,194) $26,857 $(461,709)
Other Long-Term Liabilities
Other Long-Term Liabilities

(5) Other Long-Term Liabilities

 

The Partnership entered into 9 and 10-year capital leases for certain compressor equipment. Assets under capital leases are summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

   Years ended December 31,
   2011 2010
Compression equipment $37,199 $37,199
Less: Accumulated amortization  (10,361)  (6,910)
Net assets under capital lease $26,838 $30,289
        
        
The following are the minimum lease payments to be made in each of the following years indicated for the capital lease in effect as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
       

Fiscal Year   
2012 through 2016 ($4,582 annually) $22,910
Thereafter   12,100
Less: Interest   (6,643)
Net minimum lease payments under capital lease   28,367
Less: Current portion of net minimum lease payments   (4,448)
Long-term portion of net minimum lease payments  $23,919
Income Taxes
Income Taxes

(6) Income Taxes

 

The Partnership is generally not subject to income taxes, except as discussed below, because its income is taxed directly to its partners. The net tax basis in the Partnership's assets and liabilities is less than the reported amounts on the financial statements by approximately $611.1 million as of December 31, 2011. The Partnership is subject to the margin tax enacted by the state of Texas on May 1, 2006.

 

The LIG entities the Partnership formed to acquire the stock of LIG Pipeline Company and its subsidiaries, are treated as taxable corporations for income tax purposes. The entity structure was formed to effect the matching of the tax cost to the Partnership of a step-up in the basis of the assets to fair market value with the recognition of benefits of the step-up by the Partnership. A deferred tax liability of $8.2 million was recorded at the acquisition date. The deferred tax liability represents future taxes payable on the difference between the fair value and tax basis of the assets acquired.

 

The Partnership provides for income taxes using the liability method. Accordingly, deferred taxes are recorded for the differences between the tax and book basis that will reverse in future periods (in thousands).

 

   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
Current tax provision $1,771 $1,517 $2,258
Deferred tax (benefit)  (645)  (396)  (468)
Income tax provision on continuing operations  1,126  1,121  1,790
Income tax provision on discontinued operations (all current)   -  0  1,136
Tax provision $1,126 $1,121 $2,926
           
 A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes is as follows (in thousands):
           
   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
Federal income tax on taxable corporation at statutory rate (35%) $199 $43 $200
State income taxes, net  927  1,078  2,726
Income tax provision $1,126 $1,121 $2,926

 The principal component of the Partnership's net deferred tax liability is as follows (in thousands):
           
      Years Ended December 31,
      2011 2010
Deferred income tax assets:      
           
Deferred income tax liabilities:      
Property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets-current $(501) $(501)
Property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets-long-term  (7,192)  (7,837)
      $(7,693) $(8,338)
Net deferred tax liability $(7,693) $(8,338)
           
 A net current deferred tax liability of $0.5 million is included in other current liabilities.

 A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
           
Balance as of December 31, 2009 $3,124
Increases related to prior year tax positions  110
Increases related to current year tax positions  470
Balance as of December 31, 2010 $3,704
Decreases related to prior year tax positions  (8)
Increases related to current year tax positions  517
Balance as of December 31, 2011 $4,213

Unrecognized tax benefits of $4.2 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. It is unknown when the uncertain tax position will be resolved.

Per company accounting policy election, $0.1 million of penalties and interest related to prior year tax positions was recorded to income tax expense in 2011. In the event interest or penalties are incurred with respect to income tax matters, our policy will be to include such items in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2011, tax years 2008 through 2011 remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and tax years 2007 through 2011 remain subject to examination by various state taxing authorities.

 

 

Partners' Capital
Partner Capital

(7)       Partners' Capital

 

 

(a) Sale of Preferred Units

 

On January 19, 2010, the Partnership issued approximately $125.0 million of Series A Convertible Preferred Units to an affiliate of Blackstone/GSO Capital Solutions for net proceeds of $120.8 million. The general partner of the Partnership made a contribution of $2.6 million in connection with the issuance to maintain its 2% general partner interest. The 14,705,882 preferred units are convertible by the holders thereof at any time into common units on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain adjustments in the event of certain dilutive issuances of common units. The Partnership has the right to force conversion of the preferred units after three years from the issue date if (i) the daily volume-weighted average trading price of the common units is greater than $12.75 per unit for 20 out of the trailing 30 trading days ending on two trading days before the date on which the Partnership delivers notice of such conversion, and (ii) the average daily trading volume of common units must have exceeded 250,000 common units for 20 out of the trailing 30 trading days ending on two trading days before the date on which the Partnership delivers notice of such conversion. The preferred units are not redeemable, but are entitled to a quarterly distribution that will be the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. Such quarterly distribution may be paid in cash, in additional preferred units issued in kind or any combination thereof, provided that the distribution may not be paid in additional preferred units if the Partnership pays cash distribution on common units. During 2011 and 2010, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions on its preferred units of $17.2 million and $9.9 million, respectively. A distribution on the preferred units of $4.7 million has been declared for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and was paid in February 2012.

 

The preferred units were issued at a discount to the market price of the common units they are convertible into. This discount totaling $22.3 million represents a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) and is reflected as a reduction in common unit equity and an increase in preferred equity to reflect the market value of the preferred units at issuance on the Partnership's consolidated statement of changes in partners' equity for the year ended December 31, 2010. The impact of the BCF is also included in earnings per unit for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

(bSenior Subordinated Series D Units

 

On March 23, 2007, the Partnership issued an aggregate of 3,875,340 senior subordinated series D units representing limited partner interests of the Partnership in a private offering. These senior subordinated series D units converted into common units representing limited partner interest of the Partnership on March 23, 2009. Since the Partnership did not make distribution of available cash from operating surplus, as defined in the partnership agreement, of at least $0.62 per unit on each outstanding common unit for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, each senior subordinated series D unit converted into 1.05 common units for a total issuance of 4,069,106 common units.

 

(c) Cash Distributions

 

Unless restricted by the terms of the Partnership's credit facility and/or senior unsecured note indenture, the Partnership must make distributions of 100% of available cash, as defined in the partnership agreement, within 45 days following the end of each quarter. As described under (a) Sale of Preferred Units above, the preferred units are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. The general partner is not entitled to a 2% distribution with respect to the quarterly preferred distribution of $0.2125 per unit that is made solely to the preferred unitholders. The general partner is entitled to a 2% distribution with respect to all distributions made to common unitholders. If the distributions are in excess of $0.2125 per unit, distributions are made 98% to the common and preferred unitholders and 2% to the general partner, subject to the payment of incentive distributions as described below to the extent that certain target levels of cash distributions are achieved.

 

Under the quarterly incentive distribution provisions, generally the Partnership's general partner is entitled to 13% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.25 per unit, 23% of the amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.3125 per unit and 48% of amounts the Partnership distributes distribute in excess of $0.375 per unit. Incentive distributions totaling $2.4 million and $0.1 million were earned by our general partner for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Partnership paid annual distributions per common unit of $1.17, $0.25 and $0.25 in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

The Partnership increased its fourth quarter distribution on its common units to $0.32 per unit which was paid February 11, 2012.

 

(d) Earnings per Unit and Dilution Computations

 

The Partnership had common units and preferred units outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and common units and senior subordinated series D units outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2009. The senior subordinated series D units, which converted to common units in March 2009, were considered common securities prior to conversion but were presented as a separate class of common equity because they did not participate in cash distributions during their subordination period. The senior subordinated series D units were issued in March 2007 at a discount, referred to as BCF, totaling $34.3 million to the market price of the common units they were convertible into at the end of their subordination period. Since the conversion of the senior subordinated series D units into common units was contingent until the end of their subordination period, the BCF was not recognized until the end of such subordination period when the criteria for conversion was met. The BCFs attributable to both the senior subordinated series D units and the preferred units, discussed under (a) Sale of Preferred Units above, represent non-cash distributions that are treated in the same way as a cash distribution for earnings per unit computations.

 

The preferred units are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. Income is allocated to the preferred units in an amount equal to the quarterly distribution with respect to the period earned.

 

As required under FASB ASC 260-10-45-61A unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive non-forfeitable distributions are considered participating securities, as defined in FASB ASC 260-10-20, for earnings per unit calculations. The following table reflects the computation of basic earnings per limited partner units for the periods presented (in thousands except per unit amounts):

 

   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
           
Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) $ (19,698) $ (57,506) $ 105,225
Distributed earnings allocated to:         
 Common units (1) $ 62,238 $ 25,606 $ 11,234
 Unvested restricted units   1,187   545   134
 Senior subordinated series D units (2)   -   -   34,297
 Total distributed earnings $ 63,425 $ 26,151 $ 45,665
Undistributed earnings allocated to:         
 Common units (3) $ (81,616) $ (81,703) $ 58,220
 Unvested restricted units (3)   (1,507)   (1,954)   1,340
 Total undistributed earnings (loss) $ (83,123) $ (83,657) $ 59,560
Net income (loss) allocated to:         
 Common units $ (19,377) $ (56,097) $ 69,454
 Unvested restricted units   (321)   (1,409)   1,474
 Senior subordinated series D units   -   -   34,297
 Total limited partners' interest in net income (loss) $ (19,698) $ (57,506) $ 105,225
Limited Partners' interest in income from discontinued operations:         
 Common units $ - $ - $ 174,278
 Unvested restricted units   -   -   4,034
 Total income from discontinued operation (4) $ - $ - $ 178,312
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from continuing operations:         
 Common units $(0.38) $(1.12) $(2.18)
 Senior subordinated series D units $0.00 $0.00 $8.85
Basic and diluted net income per unit from discontinuing operations:         
 Basic common unit $0.00 $0.00 $3.62
 Diluted common units $0.00 $0.00 $3.52
Total basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit:         
 Basic common unit $(0.38) $(1.12) $1.44
 Diluted common units $(0.38) $(1.12) $1.40
 Senior subordinated series D units $0.00 $0.00 $8.85

 

  • Represents distributions declared to common and subordinated unitholders.
  • Represents BCF recognized at end of subordination period for senior subordinated series D units.
  • All undistributed earnings and losses are allocated to common units and unvested restricted units during the subordination period.
  • Represents 98.0% for the limited partners' interest in discontinued operations.

 

The following are the unit amounts used to compute the basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):

 

           
   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
Basic and diluted earnings per unit:         
 Weighted average limited partner common units outstanding   50,590   49,960   48,161
Diluted earnings per unit:         
 Weighted average limited partner units outstanding   50,590   49,960   48,161
 Dilutive effect of restricted units issued   -   -   433
 Dilutive effect of senior subordinated units   -   -   871
 Dilutive effect of exercise of options outstanding   -   -   2
 Dilutive weighted average limited partner common units outstanding   50,590   49,960   49,467
 Weighted average diluted senior subordinated Series D units outstanding   -   -   3,875

All outstanding units were included in the computation of diluted earnings per unit and weighted based on the number of days such units were outstanding during the period presented. All common unit equivalents were antidilutive for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 because the limited partners were allocated a net loss in these periods.

 

When quarterly distributions are made pro-rata to common and preferred unitholders, net income for the general partner consists of incentive distributions to the extent earned, a deduction for stock-based compensation attributable to CEI's stock options and restricted shares and 2% of the original Partnership's net income (loss) adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner. When quarterly distributions are made solely to the preferred unitholders, the net income for the general partner consists of the CEI stock-based compensation deduction and 2% of the Partnership's net income (loss) after the allocation of income to the preferred unitholders with respect to their preferred distribution adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner. The net income (loss) allocated to the general partner is as follows (in thousands):

           
   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
Income allocation for incentive distributions $ 2,372 $ 99 $ -
Stock-based compensation attributable to CEI's stock options          
and restricted shares   (3,119)   (3,906)   (2,966)
2% general partner interest in net income (loss)   15   (564)   2,147
General partner share of net income (loss) $ (732) $(4,371) $(819)
Retirement Plan
Retirement Plan

(8) Retirement Plans

 

The Partnership sponsors a single employer 401(k) plan for employees who become eligible upon the date of hire. The plan allows for contributions to be made at each compensation calculation period based on the annual discretionary contribution rate. Contributions of $2.5 million, $2.3 million, and $3.1 million were made to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Employee Incentive Plan
Employee Incentive

(9) Employee Incentive Plans

 

(a) Long-Term Incentive Plans

 

The Partnership's managing general partner has a long-term incentive plan for its employees, directors, and affiliates who perform services for the Partnership. The plan currently permits the grant of awards covering an aggregate of 5,600,000 common unit options and restricted units. The plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Partnership's managing general partner's board of directors. The units issued upon exercise or vesting are newly issued units.

 

(b) Restricted Units

 

A restricted unit is a “phantom” unit that entitles the grantee to receive a common unit upon the vesting of the phantom unit, or in the discretion of the compensation committee, cash equivalent to the value of a common unit. In addition, the restricted units will become exercisable upon a change of control of the Partnership, its general partner.

 

The restricted units are intended to serve as a means of incentive compensation for performance and not primarily as an opportunity to participate in the equity appreciation of the common units. Therefore, plan participants will not pay any consideration for the common units they receive and the Partnership will receive no remuneration for the units. The restricted units include a tandem award that entitles the participant to receive cash payments equal to the cash distributions made by the Partnership with respect to its outstanding common units until the restriction period is terminated or the restricted units are forfeited. The restricted units granted in 2011, 2010 and 2009 generally cliff vest after three years of service.

 

The restricted units are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of common units on such date. A summary of the restricted unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2011 is provided below:

 

    
      Weighted
      Average
   Number of Grant-Date
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: Units Fair Value
Non-vested, beginning of period    1,047,374 $ 10.30
 Granted    385,571   15.39
 Vested*    (410,418)   14.48
 Forfeited    (72,683)   11.72
Non-vested, end of period    949,844 $ 10.45
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands)  $ 15,406  
_________________________
* Vested units include 116,458 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.
        

A summary of the restricted units' aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested (market value at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are provided below (in thousands):

 

  Years Ended December 31,
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: 2011 2010 2009
Aggregate intrinsic value of units vested  $ 6,438 $ 11,076 $ 1,023
Fair value of units vested  $ 5,945 $ 5,785 $ 4,158
          
As of December 31, 2011, there was $5.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.
         

(c) Unit Options

 

Unit options will have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the units on the date of grant. In general, unit options granted will become exercisable over a period determined by the compensation committee. In addition, unit options will become exercisable upon a change in control of the Partnership or its general partner.

 

The fair value of each unit option award is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. This model is based on the assumptions summarized below. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Partnership's traded common units. The Partnership has used historical data to estimate share option exercise and employee departure behavior to estimate expected forfeiture rates. The expected life of unit options represents the period of time that unit options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the expected term of the unit option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The Partnership used the simplified method to calculate the expected term.

 

Unit options are generally awarded with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Partnership's common units at the date of grant. The unit options granted in 2009 generally vest based on 3 years of service (one-third after each year of service). There were no options granted in 2011 or 2010. The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model for grants in 2009:

 

   Years ended December 31, 2009 
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options Granted:   
Weighted average distribution yield   -%
Weighted average expected volatility   76.2%
Weighted average risk free interest rate   2.34%
Weighted average expected life  6 years  
Weighted average contractual life  10 years  
Weighted average of fair value of unit options granted $ 2.89 
      
 A summary of the unit option activity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below: 
      

   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
    Weighted   Weighted   Weighted
  Number of Average Number of Average Number of Average
  Units Exercise Price Units Exercise Price Units Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of period   611,311 $6.77   882,836 $6.43   1,304,194 $30.64
 Granted (a)   -   0.00   -   0.00   636,122  4.46
 Issued in Exchange   -   0.00   -   0.00   344,319  4.80
 Rendered in Exchange   -   0.00   -   0.00   (1,032,403)  31.34
 Exercised    (128,477)  4.61   (198,725)  4.48   (2,013)  4.08
 Forfeited    (31,260)  12.83   (67,183)  9.27   (328,295)  27.51
 Expired   -   0.00   (5,617)  5.37   (39,088)  30.30
Outstanding, end of period   451,574 $6.99  611,311 $6.77  882,836 $6.43
Options exercisable at end of period    315,742 $7.42  278,214 $7.78  159,929 $12.51
Weighted average contractual term (years) end of period:                  
 Options outstanding   7.2  0.0  8.2   -  8.7   -
 Options exercisable   6.9  0.0  7.6   -  4.5   -
Aggregate intrinsic value end of period (in thousands):                  
 Options outstanding  $4,648  0 $5,350   - $3,143   -
 Options exercisable  $3,260  0 $2,463   - $336   -

 

  • No options were granted with an exercise price less than or equal to market value at grant during 2009.

 

In May 2009, the Partnership's unitholders approved an amendment to the Partnership's long-term incentive plan to allow an option exchange program. This option exchange program was offered to all eligible employees excluding executive officers and directors because options held by employees were “underwater,” meaning the exercise price of the options were higher than the current market price of the common units. The terms of the offer included an exchange ratio of 3 old options for 1 replacement option with an exercise price of $4.80 per common unit (120% of the average closing sales price for five trading days prior to the date of grant) which will vest over 2 years (50% after year 1 and 50% after year 2). In June 2009, a total of 453 employees elected to exchange 1,032,403 old options for 344,319 replacement options pursuant to this option exchange program. There was no incremental compensation cost resulting from the modifications under this option exchange program.

 

A summary of the unit options intrinsic value exercised (market value in excess of exercise price at date of exercise) and fair value of units vested (value per Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below (in thousands):

 

  Years Ended December 31,
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options: 2011 2010 2009
Intrinsic value of units options exercised  $1,527 $1,470 $5
Fair value of unit options vested  $563 $764 $1,675
          
As of December 31, 2011, there was $0.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested unit options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1 year.
         

(d)       Crosstex Energy, Inc.'s Restricted Stock

 

The Crosstex Energy, Inc. long-term incentive plan provides for the award of restricted stock (collectively, “Awards”) for up to 7,190,000 shares of Crosstex Energy, Inc.'s common stock. As of January 1, 2012, approximately 1,642,396 shares remained available under the long-term incentive plans for future issuance to participants. The maximum number of shares set forth above are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of a recapitalization of the capital structure of Crosstex Energy, Inc. or reorganization of Crosstex Energy, Inc. Awards that are forfeited, terminated or expire unexercised become immediately available for additional awards under the long-term incentive plan.

 

CEI's restricted shares are included at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of the common stock on such date. CEI's restricted stock granted in 2011, 2010 and 2009 generally cliff vest after three years of service. A summary of the restricted stock activity which includes officers and employees of the Partnership and directors of CELP for the year ended December 31, 2011, is provided below:

 

    
  
     Weighted
     Average
   Number of Grant-Date
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: Shares Fair Value
Non-vested, beginning of period    1,108,998 $ 8.64
 Granted    617,347   9.44
 Vested*    (412,185)   13.64
 Forfeited    (92,809)   8.01
Non-vested, end of period    1,221,351 $ 7.40
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands)  $ 15,438  
        
___________________________
* Vested units include 113,021 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees.

A summary of the restricted shares' aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of shares vested (market value at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below (in thousands):

 

  Years Ended December 31,
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: 2011 2010 2009
Aggregate intrinsic value of shares vested  $ 3,915 $ 3,163 $ 1,038
Fair value of shares vested  $ 5,623 $ 4,388 $ 4,382

As of December 31, 2011 there was $5.2 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to CEI restricted shares for directors, officers and employees. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years.

(e)       Crosstex Energy, Inc.'s Stock Options

 

CEI stock options have not been granted since 2005. A summary of the stock option activity includes officers and employees of the Partnership and directors of CEI for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below:

 

   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
     Weighted   Weighted   Weighted
   Number of Average Number of Average Number of Average
   Units Exercise Price Units Exercise Price Units Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of period    37,500 $ 6.50   67,500 $ 9.54   67,500 $ 9.54
 Forfeited   -   -   (30,000)   13.33   -   -
Outstanding, end of period   37,500 $ 6.50  37,500 $ 6.50  67,500 $ 9.54
Options exercisable at end of period   37,500 $ 6.50  37,500 $ 6.50  67,500 $ 9.54
                    

A summary of the share options' intrinsic value (market value in excess of exercise price at date of exercise) exercised and fair value of units vested (value per Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below (in thousands):

 

  Years Ended December 31,
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Stock Options: 2011 2010 2009
Fair value of units vested  $ -  $ -  $ 49
Derivatives
Derivatives

(10) Derivatives

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

The Partnership did have any interest rate swaps during the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

The impact of the interest rate swaps on net income is included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations as part of interest expense, net, as follows (in thousands):

  Years Ended December 31,
   2010 2009
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge      
 accounting  $ 22,405 $ 797
Realized losses on derivatives    (26,542)   (19,044)
Loss on interest rate swaps included in continuing operations $ (4,137) $ (18,247)

Commodity Swaps

 

The Partnership manages its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. Swaps are used to manage and hedge prices and location risk related to these market exposures. Swaps are also used to manage margins on offsetting fixed-price purchase or sale commitments for physical quantities of natural gas and NGLs.

 

The Partnership commonly enters into various derivative financial transactions which it does not designate as hedges. These transactions include “swing swaps,” “third party on-system financial swaps,” “storage swaps,” “basis swaps,”processing margin swaps” and “put options”. Swing swaps are generally short-term in nature (one month), and are usually entered into to protect against changes in the volume of daily versus first-of-month index priced gas supplies or markets. Third party on-system financial swaps are hedges that the Partnership enters into on behalf of its customers who are connected to its systems, wherein the Partnership fixes a supply or market price for a period of time for its customers, and simultaneously enters into the derivative transaction. Storage swap transactions protect against changes in the value of gas that the Partnership has stored to serve various operational requirements. Basis swaps are used to hedge basis location price risk due to buying gas into one of our systems on one index and selling gas off that same system on a different index. Processing margin financial swaps are used to hedge fractionation spread risk at our processing plants relating to the option to process versus bypassing our equity gas. Put options are purchased to hedge against declines in pricing and as such represent options, not obligations, to sell the related underlying volumes at a fixed price.

 

The components of (gain) loss on derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations relating to commodity swaps are (in thousands):

 

   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010 2009
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge         
 accounting  $ 726 $ 1,003 $ 2,816
Realized (gains) losses on derivatives    7,015   7,955   (6,139)
Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting    (158)   142   65
Net (gains) losses related to commodity swaps  $ 7,583 $ 9,100 $ (3,258)
Put option premium mark to market   193   -    -
Net losses included in income from discontinued operations   -    -    264
(Gains) losses on derivatives included in continuing operations  $ 7,776 $ 9,100 $ (2,994)

 The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities relating to commodity swaps are as follows (in thousands):
        
   Years Ended December 31,
   2011 2010
Fair value of derivative assets — current, designated  $ 151 $ 1
Fair value of derivative assets — current, non-designated    2,716   5,522
Fair value of derivative assets — long term, non-designated    -    1,169
Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, designated    (702)   (1,066)
Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, non-designated    (4,885)   (6,914)
Fair value of derivative liabilities — long term, non-designated    -    (1,156)
Net fair value of derivatives  $ (2,720) $ (2,444)

Set forth below is the summarized notional volumes and fair value of all instruments held for price risk management purposes and related physical offsets at December 31, 2011 (all gas volumes are expressed in MMBtu's and liquids volumes are expressed in gallons). The remaining term of the contracts extend no later than December 2012. Changes in the fair value of the Partnership's mark to market derivatives are recorded in earnings in the period the transaction is entered into. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the related anticipated future cash flow is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion is recorded in earnings immediately.

 

   December 31, 2011
Transaction Type Volume Fair Value
   (In thousands)
Cash Flow Hedges:*     
 Liquids swaps (short contracts)   (7,876) $ (551)
 Total swaps designated as cash flow hedges    $ (551)
       
Mark to Market Derivatives:*     
 Swing swaps (short contracts)   (1,600) $ (1)
 Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (long contracts)   1,600   (6)
       
 Basis swaps (long contracts)   5,635   1,341
 Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (short contracts)   (1,116)   3,102
 Basis swaps (short contracts)   (5,635)   (1,348)
 Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (long contracts)   1,085   (3,282)
       
       
 Processing margin hedges — liquids (short contracts)   (14,338)   (294)
 Processing margin hedges — gas (long contracts)   1,620   (2,301)
 Processing margin hedges — gas (short contracts)   (187)   163
       
 Storage swap transactions (long contracts)   70   (5)
 Storage swap transactions (short contracts)   (360)   462
       
 Total mark to market derivatives    $ (2,169)

 

*       All are gas contracts, volume in MMBtu's, except for processing margin hedges — liquids and liquids swaps (volume in gallons).

 

On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership analyzes the counterparty's financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership primarily deals with two types of counterparties, financial institutions and other energy companies, when entering into financial derivatives on commodities. The Partnership has entered into Master International Swaps and Derivatives Association Agreements that allow for netting of swap contract receivables and payables in the event of default by either party. If the Partnership's counterparties failed to perform under existing swap contracts, the Partnership's maximum loss as of December 31, 2011 of $5.9 million would be reduced to $3.9 million due to the netting feature.

 

Impact of Cash Flow Hedges

 

The impact of realized gains or losses from derivatives designated as cash flow hedge contracts in the consolidated statements of operations is summarized below (in thousands):

 

   Years Ended December 31,
Increase (decrease) in Midstream revenue 2011 2010 2009
Natural gas  $ -  $ -  $ 2,156
Liquids    (2,772)   (1,733)   9,707
Realized (gain) loss included in income from discontinued operations    -    -    (759)
  $ (2,772) $ (1,733) $ 11,104

Natural Gas

 

As of December 31, 2011, the Partnership has no balances in accumulated other comprehensive income related to natural gas.

 

Liquids

 

As of December 31, 2011, an unrealized derivative fair value net loss of $0.5 million related to cash flow hedges of liquids price risk was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Of this net amount, a $0.5 million loss is expected to be reclassified into earnings through December 2012. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark to market prices at the contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related physical volume, which amount is not reflected above.

 

Derivatives Other Than Cash Flow Hedges

 

Assets and liabilities related to third party derivative contracts, swing swaps, basis swaps, storage swaps and processing margin swaps are included in the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities and the profit and loss on the mark to market value of these contracts are recorded net as (gain) loss on derivatives in the consolidated statement of operations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of all of its energy trading contracts using actively quoted prices. The estimated fair value of energy trading contracts by maturity date was as follows (in thousands):

 

  Maturity Periods
  Less than one year One to two years More than two years Total fair value
December 31, 2011. $ (2,169) $ -  $ -  $ (2,169)
Fair Value Measurements
Fair Value Measurements

(11) Fair Value Measurements

 

FASB ASC 820 sets forth a framework for measuring fair value and required disclosures about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. Fair value under FASB ASC 820 is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability's fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, use of unobservable prices or inputs are used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the item being valued.

 

FASB ASC 820 established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

 

The Partnership's derivative contracts primarily consist of commodity swap contracts which are not traded on a public exchange. The fair values of commodity swap contracts are determined using discounted cash flow techniques. The techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for future commodity prices that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument's term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk and are classified as Level 2 in hierarchy.

 

Net assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

 

    Years Ended December 31,
    2011 2010
    Level 2 Level 2
Interest Rate Swaps  $ -  $ -
Commodity Swaps*    (2,720)   (2,444)
Total  $ (2,720) $ (2,444)
         
         
*Unrealized gains or losses on commodity derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income at each measurement date.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The estimated fair value of the Partnership's financial instruments has been determined by the Partnership using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value, thus, the estimates provided below are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Partnership could realize upon the sale or refinancing of such financial instruments (in thousands).

 

   December 31, 2011 December 31, 2010
   Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
   Value Value Value Value
Long-term debt  $ 798,409 $ 882,500 $ 718,570 $ 768,308
Obligations under capital lease    28,367   27,637   31,327   28,807

The carrying amounts of the Partnership's cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.

 

The Partnership had $85.0 million in borrowings under its revolving credit facility included in long-term debt as of December 31, 2011 and no borrowings under this credit facility as of December 31, 2010. Borrowings under the credit facility accrue interest under a floating interest rate structure so the carrying value of such indebtedness approximates fair value for the amounts outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Partnership also had borrowings totaling $713.4 million and $711.5 million, net of discount, respectively, under senior unsecured notes with a fixed rate of 8.875% and a series B secured note with a principal amount of $7.1 million as of December 31, 2010 with a fixed rate of 9.5%. The fair value of the senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was based on third party market quotations. The fair values of the series B secured note as of December 31, 2010 was adjusted to reflect current market interest rates for such borrowings on that date.

 

 

Commitments and Contingencies
Commitment and Contingencies

(13) Commitments and Contingencies

 

(a) Leases – Lessee

 

The Partnership has operating leases for office space, office and field equipment.

 

The following table summarizes the Partnership remaining non-cancelable future payments under operating leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year (in thousands):

 

2012  $13,191
2013   7,649
2014   5,941
2015   4,535
2016   4,469
Thereafter  5,528
  $41,313
    
Operating lease rental expense in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was approximately $21.9 million, $21.9 million and $30.7 million, respectively.

(b) Employment and Severance Agreements

 

Certain members of management of the Partnership are parties to employment and/or severance agreements with the general partner. The employment and severance agreements provide those managers with severance payments in certain circumstances and, in the case of employment agreements, prohibit each such person from competing with the general partner or its affiliates for a certain period of time following the termination of such person's employment.

 

(c) Environmental Issues

 

The Partnership acquired LIG Pipeline Company and its subsidiaries on April 1, 2004. Contamination from historical operations was identified during due diligence at a number of sites owned by the acquired companies. The seller, AEP, has indemnified the Partnership for these identified sites. Moreover, AEP has entered into an agreement with a third-party company pursuant to which the remediation costs associated with these sites have been assumed by this third party company that specializes in remediation work. The Partnership does not expect to incur any material liability with these sites; however, there can be no assurance that the third parties who have assumed responsibility for remediation of site conditions will fulfill their obligations.

 

(d) Other

 

The Partnership is involved in various litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, any liabilities that may result from these claims would not individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.

 

 

On June 7, 2010, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, Formosa Plastics Corporation America, Formosa Utility Venture, Ltd., and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America filed a lawsuit against Crosstex Energy, Inc., Crosstex Energy, L.P., Crosstex Energy GP, L.P., Crosstex Energy GP, LLC, Crosstex Energy Services, L.P., and Crosstex Gulf Coast Marketing, Ltd. in the 24th Judicial District Court of Calhoun County, Texas, asserting claims for negligence, res ipsa loquitor, products liability and strict liability relating to the alleged receipt by the plaintiffs of natural gas liquids into their facilities from facilities operated by the Partnership. The amended petition alleges that the plaintiffs have incurred approximately $35.0 million in damages, including damage to equipment and lost profits. The Partnership has submitted the claim to its insurance carriers and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The Partnership believes that any recovery would be within applicable policy limits. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Partnership does not expect that an award in this matter will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

 

At times, the Partnership's gas-utility subsidiaries acquire pipeline easements and other property rights by exercising rights of eminent domain provided under state law. As a result, the Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is a party to a number of lawsuits under which a court will determine the value of pipeline easements or other property interests obtained by the Partnership's gas utility subsidiaries by condemnation. Damage awards in these suits should reflect the value of the property interest acquired and the diminution in the value of the remaining property owned by the landowner. However, some landowners have alleged unique damage theories to inflate their damage claims or assert valuation methodologies that could result in damage awards in excess of the amounts anticipated. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters, the Partnership does not expect that awards in these matters will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

 

The Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is defending a number of lawsuits filed by owners of property located near processing facilities or compression facilities constructed by the Partnership as part of its systems. The suits generally allege that the facilities create a private nuisance and have damaged the value of surrounding property. Claims of this nature have arisen as a result of the industrial development of natural gas gathering, processing and treating facilities in urban and occupied rural areas. In January 2012, a plaintiff in one of these lawsuits was awarded a judgment of $2.0 million. The Partnership intends to appeal the matter and will post a bond to secure the judgment pending its resolution. The Partnership has accrued $2.0 million related to this matter as of December 31, 2011 and reflected the related expense in operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2011. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters, the Partnership does not expect that awards in these matters will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

 

 

Segment Information
Segment Information

(14) Segment Information

 

Identification of operating segments is based principally upon regions served. The Partnership's reportable segments consist of the natural gas gathering, processing and transmission operations located in north Texas and in the Permian Basin in west Texas (NTX), the pipelines and processing plants located in Louisiana (LIG) and the south Louisiana processing and NGL assets (PNGL). Segment data for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 do not include assets held for sale. The Partnership's sales are derived from external domestic customers.

 

The Partnership evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating revenues and segment profits. Corporate expenses include general partnership expenses associated with managing all reportable operating segments. Corporate assets consist principally of property and equipment, including software, for general corporate support, working capital, debt financing costs and its investment in HEP. Profit in the corporate segment for the years ended 2010 and 2009 includes the operating activity of assets sold but not considered discontinued operations as well as intersegment eliminations.

 

Summarized financial information concerning the Partnership's reportable segments is shown in the following table.

 

    LIG NTX PNGL Corporate Totals
                  
    (In thousands)
Year Ended December 31, 2011:          
 Sales to external customers  $ 811,216 $ 332,026 $ 870,700 $ -  $ 2,013,942
 Sales to affiliates    128,130   100,527   40,185   (268,842)   -
 Purchased gas and NGLs    (809,471)   (262,708)   (835,440)   268,842   (1,638,777)
 Operating expenses    (35,434)   (48,807)   (27,537)   -    (111,778)
 Segment profit  $ 94,441 $ 121,038 $ 47,908 $ -  $ 263,387
 Gain (loss) on derivatives  $ (6,145) $ (1,896) $ 265 $ -  $ (7,776)
 Depreciation, amortization               
   and impairments  $ (13,602) $ (76,535) $ (31,271) $ (3,876) $ (125,284)
 Capital expenditures  $ 2,820 $ 73,069 $ 25,618 $ 2,629 $ 104,136
 Identifiable assets  $ 304,372 $ 1,113,431 $ 460,865 $ 76,663 $ 1,955,331
Year Ended December 31, 2010:               
 Sales to external customers  $ 880,336 $ 309,771 $ 602,569 $ -  $ 1,792,676
 Sales to affiliates    82,688   89,752   -    (172,440)   -
 Purchased gas and NGLs    (845,627)   (240,085)   (541,104)   172,440   (1,454,376)
 Operating expenses    (33,188)   (46,384)   (25,488)   -    (105,060)
 Segment profit  $ 84,209 $ 113,054 $ 35,977 $ -  $ 233,240
 Loss on derivatives  $ (3,664) $ (5,352) $ (84) $ -  $ (9,100)
 Depreciation, amortization and               
  impairments $ (12,308) $ (64,458) $ (31,661) $ (4,435) $ (112,862)
 Capital expenditures  $ 9,930 $ 31,678 $ 5,871 $ 1,907 $ 49,386
 Identifiable assets  $ 330,199 $ 1,107,279 $ 493,143 $ 54,319 $ 1,984,940
Year Ended December 31, 2009               
 Sales to external customers  $ 830,248 $ 439,265 $ 297,872 $ 16,166 $ 1,583,551
 Sales to affiliates    63,581   70,141   -    (133,722)   -
 Purchased gas and NGLs    (792,991)   (352,762)   (250,060)   123,484   (1,272,329)
 Operating expenses    (27,550)   (49,379)   (30,991)   (2,474)   (110,394)
 Segment profit  $ 73,288 $ 107,265 $ 16,821 $ 3,454 $ 200,828
 Gain (loss) on derivatives  $ (467) $ 2,289 $ 1,172 $ -  $ 2,994
 Depreciation, amortization                
   and impairments $ (12,996) $ (65,956) $ (35,284) $ (7,746) $ (121,982)
 Capital expenditures  $ 30,992 $ 43,289 $ 7,973 $ 1,153 $ 83,407
 Identifiable assets  $ 341,495 $ 1,168,182 $ 505,155 $ 54,349 $ 2,069,181

 The following table reconciles the segment profits reported above to the operating income as reported in the consolidated
statements of operations (in thousands):
             
    Years ended December 31, 
    2011 2010 2009 
 Segment profits  $ 263,387 $ 233,240 $ 200,828 
 General and administrative expenses    (52,801)   (48,414)   (59,854) 
 Gain (loss) on derivatives    (7,776)   (9,100)   2,994 
 Gain (loss) on sale of property    (264)   13,881   666 
 Depreciation, amortization and impairments    (125,284)   (112,862)   (121,982) 
 Operating income  $ 77,262 $ 76,745 $ 22,652 
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly Financial Data

(15) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

 

Summarized unaudited quarterly financial data is presented below.

 

   First Second Third Fourth Total
                 
   (In thousands, except per unit data)
2011:               
Revenues (1) $489,770 $525,735 $517,498 $480,939 $2,013,942
Operating income $19,983 $22,890 $16,249 $18,140 $77,262
Net income (loss) attributable to the               
 non-controlling interest $(54) $(52) $(23) $81 $(48)
Net income (loss) attributable to the               
 Crosstex Energy, L.P. $128 $1,667 $(2,736) $(1,401) $(2,342)
Preferred interest in net income (loss)               
 attributable to Crosstex               
 Energy, L.P. $4,265 $4,559 $4,558 $4,706 $18,088
Beneficial conversion feature               
General partner interest in net                
 income (loss) $(522) $(111) $(76) $(23) $(732)
Limited partners' interest in net income               
 (loss) attributable to               
 Crosstex Energy, L.P. $(3,615) $(2,781) $(7,218) $(6,084) $(19,698)
Loss per limited partner               
 unit-basic $(0.07) $(0.05) $(0.14) $(0.12) $(0.38)
Loss per limited partner               
 unit-diluted $(0.07) $(0.05) $(0.14) $(0.12) $(0.38)
Basic and diluted senior               
                 
2010:               
Revenues $468,658 $442,048 $454,735 $427,235 $1,792,676
Operating income $24,598 $17,591 $16,731 $17,825 $76,745
Net income (loss) attributable to the               
 non-controlling interest $(35) $10 $13 $31 $19
Net loss attributable to the               
 Crosstex Energy, L.P. $(17,328) $(2,468) $(3,668) $(2,384) $(25,848)
Preferred interest in net loss               
 attributable to Crosstex               
 Energy, L.P. $3,125 $3,125 $3,676 $3,824 $13,750
Beneficial conversion feature               
 attributable to preferred units $22,279 $ - $ - $ - $22,279
General partner interest in net                
 loss $(1,496) $(1,279) $(820) $(776) $(4,371)
Limited partners' interest in net               
 loss attributable to               
 Crosstex Energy, L.P. $(41,236) $(4,314) $(6,524) $(5,432) $(57,506)
Loss per limited partner               
 unit-basic $(0.81) $ (0.08) $ (0.13) $ (0.11) $ (1.12)
Loss per limited partner               
 unit-diluted $(0.81) $(0.08) $(0.13) $(0.11) $(1.12)

  • The Partnership determined that revenues and purchased gas costs related to a new gas purchase arrangement were improperly classified as energy trading activities resulting in the netting of revenue and purchased gas which should have been shown on a gross basis in its previously-issued financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011. As a result, both revenues and purchased gas were understated by $39.5 million and $29.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011, respectively. The revenue numbers for both March 31, 2011 and June 30, 2011 properly reflect this adjustment. There is no impact on operating income.