|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Organization and Summary of Significant Agreements
(a) Description of Business
Crosstex Energy, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 12, 2002, is engaged in the gathering, transmission, processing and marketing of natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGLs). The Partnership connects the wells of natural gas producers in the geographic areas of its gathering systems in order to gather for a fee or purchase the gas production, processes natural gas for the removal of NGLs, transports natural gas and NGLs and ultimately provides natural gas and NGLs to a variety of markets. In addition, the Partnership purchases natural gas and NGLs from producers not connected to its gathering systems for resale and markets natural gas and NGLs on behalf of producers for a fee. We recently added crude oil terminal facilities in south Louisiana to provide access for crude oil producers to the premium markets in this area.
(b) Partnership Ownership
Crosstex Energy GP, LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Crosstex Energy, Inc. (CEI). As of December 31, 2011, CEI owns 16,414,830 common units in the Partnership through its wholly-owned subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2011, CEI owned 25.0% of the limited partner interests (including common and preferred interests) in the Partnership and its 2.0% of the general partner's interest.
(c) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities, and results of operations of the Partnership and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Partnership proportionately consolidates its undivided 50.0% interest in a gas processing plant invested in by the Partnership in July 2011, and its undivided 64.29% interest in a gas plant acquired by the Partnership in November 2005 (23.85%), in May 2006 (35.42%) and June 2011 (5.02%). In accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Codification 810-10-05-8, the Partnership consolidates its joint venture interest in Crosstex DC Gathering, J.V. (CDC) as discussed more fully in Note 2(f). The consolidated operations are hereafter referred to herein collectively as the “Partnership.” All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
|
(2) Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Management's Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management of the Partnership to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
(b) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
(c) Natural Gas and Natural Gas Liquids Inventory
The Partnership's inventories of products consist of natural gas and NGLs. The Partnership reports these assets at the lower of cost or market.
(d) Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consist of intrastate gas transmission systems, gas gathering systems, NGL pipelines, natural gas processing plants and NGL fractionation plants. Gas required to maintain pipeline minimum pressures is capitalized and classified as property, plant and equipment. Other property and equipment is primarily comprised of computer software and equipment, furniture, fixtures, leasehold improvements and office equipment. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Repairs and maintenance are charged against income when incurred. Renewals and betterments, which extend the useful life of the properties, are capitalized. Interest costs are capitalized to property, plant and equipment during the period the assets are undergoing preparation for intended use. Interest costs totaling $0.9 million, $0.1 million and $1.1 million were capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful life of each asset, as follows:
Useful Lives | ||
Transmission assets | 20-30 years | |
Gathering systems | 15-20 years | |
Gas processing plants | 20 years | |
Other property and equipment | 3-15 years |
Depreciation expense of $77.8 million, $75.7 million and $82.4 million was recorded for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Depreciation expense also includes the amortization of assets classified as capital lease assets.
FASB ASC 360-10-05-4 requires long-lived assets to be reviewed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. In order to determine whether an impairment has occurred, the Partnership compares the net book value of the asset to the undiscounted expected future net cash flows. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of such impairment is determined based on the expected future net cash flows discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the asset.
When determining whether impairment of one of our long-lived assets has occurred, the Partnership must estimate the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the asset. The Partnership's estimate of cash flows is based on assumptions regarding the purchase and resale margins on natural gas, volume of gas available to the asset, markets available to the asset, operating expenses, and future natural gas prices and NGL product prices. The amount of availability of gas to an asset is sometimes based on assumptions regarding future drilling activity, which may be dependent in part on natural gas prices. Projections of gas volumes and future commodity prices are inherently subjective and contingent upon a number of variable factors. Any significant variance in any of the above assumptions or factors could materially affect our cash flows, which could require us to record an impairment of an asset.
The Partnership recorded impairments to long-lived assets of $1.3 million and $2.9 million during the years ending December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. See Note 3(c) for further details on the long-lived assets impaired.
(e) Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist of customer relationships and the value of the dedicated and non-dedicated acreage attributable to pipeline, gathering and processing systems. Intangible assets associated with customer relationships are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected period of benefits of the customer relationships, which range from three to 15 years. The intangible assets associated with dedicated and non-dedicated acreage attributable to pipeline, gathering and processing systems are being amortized using the units of throughput method of amortization.
The following table represents the Partnership's total purchased intangible assets at years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Net Carrying | ||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | ||||||||
2011 | ||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 255,058 | $ | (101,762) | $ | 153,296 | ||||
Dedicated and non-dedicated acreage | 395,652 | (97,486) | 298,166 | |||||||
Total | $ | 650,710 | $ | (199,248) | $ | 451,462 | ||||
2010 | ||||||||||
Customer relationships | $ | 255,058 | $ | (86,524) | $ | 168,534 | ||||
Dedicated and non-dedicated acreage | 395,652 | (65,211) | 330,441 | |||||||
Total | $ | 650,710 | $ | (151,735) | $ | 498,975 |
The weighted average amortization period for intangible assets is 18.0 years. Amortization expense for intangibles was approximately $47.5 million, $35.9 million and $36.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The following table summarizes the Partnership's estimated aggregate amortization expense for the next five years (in thousands):
2012 | $ | 44,995 | |
2013 | 41,786 | ||
2014 | 40,578 | ||
2015 | 41,296 | ||
2016 | 41,880 | ||
Thereafter | 240,927 | ||
Total | $ | 451,462 |
(f) Investment in Limited Partnership
The Partnership owns a majority interest in Crosstex Denton County Joint Venture (CDC) and consolidates its investment in CDC pursuant to FASB ASC 810-10-05-8. The Partnership manages the business affairs of CDC, which owns a small gas gathering system in north Texas. The other joint venture partner (the CDC partner) is an unrelated third party who owns and operates a natural gas field located in Denton County, Texas.
(g) Investment in Limited Liability Company
On June 22, 2011, the Partnership entered into a limited liability agreement with Howard Energy Partners (“HEP”) for an initial capital contribution of $35.0 million in exchange for an individual ownership interest in HEP of approximately 35.0%. In addition to the Partnership's contribution, an unrelated party also provided a capital contribution of $35.0 million for a 35.0% ownership interest in HEP with HEP management and a few private investors owning the remaining 30.0% interest. HEP owns assets and provides midstream and construction services to Eagle Ford Shale producers in south Texas. This investment in HEP is accounted for under the equity method of accounting and is reflected on the balance sheet as “Investment in limited liability company.” Per the terms of the agreement, the Partnership will not recognize any income from this investment until HEP's income exceeds approximately $9.9 million on an inception to date basis due to preferred interests owned by HEP management. If HEP has losses on an inception to date basis, the Partnership will recognize 39.3% of the losses.
(h) Other Assets
Unamortized debt issuance costs totaling $24.2 million and $26.7 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, are included in other assets, net. Debt issuance costs are amortized into interest expense using the straight-line method over the terms of the debt.
(i) Gas Imbalance Accounting
Quantities of natural gas and NGLs over-delivered or under-delivered related to imbalance agreements are recorded monthly as receivables or payables using weighted average prices at the time of the imbalance. These imbalances are typically settled with deliveries of natural gas or NGLs. The Partnership had imbalance payables of $2.3 million and $1.9 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which approximate the fair value of these imbalances. The Partnership had imbalance receivables of $1.7 million and $2.9 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, which are carried at the lower of cost or market value.
(j) Asset Retirement Obligations
FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 was issued in March 2005, which became effective at December 31, 2005. FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 clarifies that the term “conditional asset retirement obligation” as used in FASB ASC 410-20, refers to a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. Since the obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional, FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 provides that a liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement activity should be recognized if that fair value can be reasonably estimated, even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 also clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation under FASB ASC 410-20. The Partnership did not provide any asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 because it does not have sufficient information as set forth in FASB ASC 410-20-25-16 to reasonably estimate such obligations, and the Partnership has no current intention of discontinuing use of any significant assets.
(k) Revenue Recognition
The Partnership recognizes revenue for sales or services at the time the natural gas or NGLs are delivered or at the time the service is performed. The Partnership generally accrues one month of sales and the related gas purchases and reverses these accruals when the sales and purchases are actually invoiced and recorded in the subsequent months. Actual results could differ from the accrual estimates. The Partnership's purchase and sale arrangements are generally reported in revenues and costs on a gross basis in the consolidated statement of operations in accordance with FASB ASC 605-45-45-1. Except for fee based arrangements, the Partnership acts as the principal in these purchase and sale transactions, has the risk and reward of ownership as evidenced by title transfer, schedules the transportation and assumes credit risk. We conduct “off-system” gas marketing operations as a service to producers on systems that we do not own. We refer to these activities as part of energy trading activities. In some cases, we earn an agency fee from the producer for arranging the marketing of the producer's natural gas. In other cases, we purchase the natural gas from the producer and enter into a sales contract with another party to sell the natural gas. The revenue and cost of sales for these activities are included in revenue on a net basis in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Partnership accounts for taxes collected from customers attributable to revenue transactions and remitted to government authorities on a net basis (excluded from revenues).
(l) Derivatives
The Partnership uses derivatives to hedge against changes in cash flows related to product price, as opposed to their use for trading purposes. FASB ASC 815 requires that all derivatives be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. We generally determine the fair value of futures contracts and swap contracts based on the difference between the derivative's fixed contract price and the underlying market price at the determination date. The asset or liability related to the derivative instruments is recorded on the balance sheet in fair value of derivative assets or liabilities.
Realized and unrealized gains and losses on commodity related derivatives that are not designated as hedges, as well as the ineffective portion of hedge derivatives, are recorded as gain or loss on derivatives in the consolidated statement of operations. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on interest rate derivatives that are not designated as hedges are included in interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Unrealized gains and losses on effective cash flow hedge derivatives are recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. When the hedged transaction occurs, the realized gain or loss on the hedge derivative is transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income to earnings. Realized gains and losses on commodity hedge derivatives are recognized in revenues, and realized gains and losses on interest hedge derivatives are recorded as adjustments to interest expense. Settlements of derivatives are included in cash flows from operating activities.
(m ) Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Comprehensive income includes net income (loss) and other comprehensive income, which includes unrealized gains and losses on derivative financial instruments. Pursuant to FASB ASC 815, the Partnership records deferred hedge gains and losses on its derivative financial instruments that qualify as cash flow hedges as other comprehensive income.
(n) Legal Costs Expected to be Incurred in Connection with a Loss Contingency
Legal costs incurred in connection with a loss contingency are expensed as incurred.
(o) Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Partnership to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of trade accounts receivable and derivative financial instruments. Management believes the risk is limited since the Partnership's customers represent a broad and diverse group of energy marketers and end users. In addition, the Partnership continually monitors and reviews credit exposure to its marketing counter-parties and letters of credit or other appropriate security are obtained as considered necessary to limit the risk of loss. The Partnership records reserves for uncollectible accounts on a specific identification basis since there is not a large volume of late paying customers. The Partnership had a reserve for uncollectible receivables as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 of $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Partnership had only one customer that represented greater than 10.0% individually of its revenue. The customer is located in the LIG segment and represented 12.3% of the consolidated revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2010, three customers accounted for 14.5%, 10.6%, 10.2% of consolidated revenue. During the year ended December 31, 2009, one customer accounted for 12.2% of the consolidated revenue including discontinued operations. As the Partnership continues to grow and expand, the relationship between individual customer sales and consolidated total sales is expected to continue to change. While these customers represent a significant percentage of revenues, the loss of these customers would not have a material adverse impact on the Partnership's results of operations because the gross operating margin received from transactions with these customers are not material to the Partnership's gross operating margin.
(p) Environmental Costs
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized as appropriate, depending on the nature of the expenditures and their future economic benefit. Expenditures that related to an existing condition caused by past operations that do not contribute to current or future revenue generation are expensed. Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded on an undiscounted basis (or a discounted basis when the obligation can be settled at fixed and determinable amounts) when environmental assessments or clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, such expenditures were not significant.
(q) Share-Based Awards
The Partnership recognizes compensation cost related to all stock-based awards, including stock options, in its consolidated financial statements in accordance with FASB ASC 718. The Partnership and CEI each have similar unit or share-based payment plans for employees, which are described below. Share-based compensation associated with the CEI share-based compensation plans awarded to officers and employees of the Partnership are recorded by the Partnership since CEI has no operating activities other than its interest in the Partnership. Amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements with respect to these plans are as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Cost of share-based compensation charged to general and | ||||||||||
administrative expense | $ | 6,157 | $ | 7,953 | $ | 7,075 | ||||
Cost of share-based compensation charged to operating expense | 1,151 | 1,323 | 1,667 | |||||||
Total amount charged to income | $ | 7,308 | $ | 9,276 | $ | 8,742 | ||||
The fair value of each option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model as disclosed in Note 9 — Employee Incentive Plans.
(r) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
We have reviewed recently issued accounting pronouncements that became effective during the year ended December 31, 2011, and have determined that none would have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
(3) Discontinued Operations, Impairments and Dispositions
(a) Discontinued Operations
The Partnership sold its midstream assets in Alabama, Mississippi and south Texas for $217.6 million in August 2009. Sales proceeds, net of transaction costs and other obligations associated with the sale, of $212.0 million were used to repay long-term indebtedness and the Partnership recognized a gain on sale of $97.2 million. In October 2009, the Partnership sold its Treating assets for net proceeds of $265.4 million. Sales proceeds, net of transaction costs and other obligations associated with the sale, of $258.1 million were used to repay long-term indebtedness and the Partnership recognized a gain on sale of $86.3 million.
The revenues, operating expenses, general and administrative expenses associated directly with the sold assets, depreciation and amortization expense, Treating inventory impairment of $1.0 million during 2009, allocated Texas margin tax and an allocated interest expense related to the operations of the sold assets have been segregated from continuing operations and reported as discontinued operations for all periods. Interest expense of $34.4 million for the year ended 2009 was allocated to discontinued operations related to the debt repaid from the proceeds from the asset dispositions using average historical interest rates for each of the three years. The interest allocation for 2009 also included make-whole interest payments and the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs related to the debt repaid. No corporate office general and administrative expenses have been allocated to income from discontinued operations. Following are revenues and income from discontinued operations (in thousands):
Year ended December 31 | ||||
2009 | ||||
Midstream revenues | $ | 327,242 | ||
Treating revenues | $ | 45,534 | ||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | (1,796) | ||
Gain from sale of discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | 183,747 |
(b) Other Disposition
The Partnership disposed of assets that were not considered discontinued operations in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009. The 2010 disposition was related to assets in east Texas for a gain of $14.0 million. The 2009 disposition was related to the Arkoma gathering assets in Oklahoma.
(c) Long-Lived Assets Impairments
Impairments of $1.3 million and $2.9 million were recorded in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to long-lived assets. Impairments during 2009 totaling $2.9 million were taken on the Bear Creek processing plant and the Vermillion treating plant to bring the fair value of the plants to a marketable value for these idle assets. The impairment in 2010 primarily relates to the write down of certain excess pipe inventory prior to its sale.
Potential Changes in Sabine Plant during 2012. Currently, our Sabine plant has a contract with a third-party to fractionate the raw-make NGLs produced by the plant. We have been unsuccessful in renewing this contract, which expires on March 1, 2012. We have an interim solution to continue to provide for fractionation of the NGLs produced by the Sabine plant. Ultimately, we plan to connect the Sabine gas supply to our Eunice plant, which can process the gas and fractionate the produced NGLs. If this processing change is made, we will likely cease operating the Sabine plant. Although we do not have specific plans at this time to relocate the Sabine plant once it is idled, we may consider it for utilization elsewhere in our operations. The net book value of the Sabine plant was $34.0 million as of December 31, 2011. If the plant is idled on a long-term basis as contemplated above, an impairment may be recorded to expense the non-recoverable costs associated with the plant's current location, which are estimated to be less than $15.0 million based on the net book value as of December 31, 2011.
|
(4) Long-Term Debt
As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Bank credit facility (due 2016), interest based on Prime and/or LIBOR plus an applicable | |||||||
margin, interest rate at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was 2.9% and 4.0%, respectively | $ | 85,000 | $ | - | |||
Senior unsecured notes, net of discount of $11.6 million and $13.5 million, respectively, | |||||||
which bear interest at the rate of 8.875% | 713,409 | 711,512 | |||||
Series B secured note assumed in the Eunice transaction, which bore interest at the rate of | |||||||
9.5% | - | 7,058 | |||||
798,409 | 718,570 | ||||||
Less current portion | - | (7,058) | |||||
Debt classified as long-term | $ | 798,409 | $ | 711,512 |
Maturities. Maturities for the long-term debt as of December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
2012 | $ | - |
2013 | - | |
2014 | - | |
2015 | - | |
2016 | 85,000 | |
Thereafter | 725,000 | |
Subtotal | 810,000 | |
Less discount | (11,591) | |
Total outstanding debt | $ | 798,409 |
Credit Facility. The Partnership made three amendments to its bank credit facility in May 2011, July 2011 and January 2012. The amendments contained the following changes:
As of December 31, 2011, there was $85.0 million of borrowing and $69.0 million in outstanding letters of credit, under the bank credit facility leaving approximately $331.0 million available for future borrowing based on a borrowing capacity of $485.0 million. Based on the January amendment to increase the credit facility borrowing capacity to $635.0 million and borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2011, the Partnership's available borrowing would be $481.0 million.
The credit facility is guaranteed by substantially all of the Partnership's subsidiaries and is secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the Partnership's assets and those of the guarantors, including all material pipeline, gas gathering and processing assets, all material working capital assets and a pledge of all of the Partnership's equity interests in substantially all of its subsidiaries.
The Partnership may prepay all loans under the credit facility at any time without premium or penalty (other than customary LIBOR breakage costs), subject to certain notice requirements. The credit facility requires mandatory prepayments of amounts outstanding thereunder with the net proceeds of certain asset sales, extraordinary receipts, equity issuances and debt incurrences, but these mandatory prepayments do not require any reduction of the lenders' commitments under the credit facility.
Under the credit facility, borrowings bear interest at the Partnership's option at the Eurodollar Rate (the British Bankers Association LIBOR Rate) plus an applicable margin or the Base Rate (the highest of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.50%, the 30-day Eurodollar Rate plus 1.0%, or the administrative agent's prime rate) plus an applicable margin. The Partnership pays a per annum fee on all letters of credit issued under the credit facility and a commitment fee of 0.50% per annum on the unused availability under the credit facility. The letter of credit fee and the applicable margins for the interest rate vary quarterly based on the Partnership's leverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, being generally computed as the ratio of total funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges, or adjusted EBITDA) and are as follows:
Base Rate | Eurodollar Rate | Letter of Credit | |||||||
Leverage Ratio | Loans | Loans | Fees | ||||||
Greater than or equal to 4.50 to 1.00 | 2.00 | % | 3.00 | % | 3.00 | % | |||
Greater than or equal to 4.00 to 1.00 and less than 4.50 to 1.00 | 1.75 | % | 2.75 | % | 2.75 | % | |||
Greater than or equal to 3.50 to 1.00 and less than 4.00 to 1.00 | 1.50 | % | 2.50 | % | 2.50 | % | |||
Greater than or equal to 3.00 to 1.00 and less than 3.50 to 1.00 | 1.25 | % | 2.25 | % | 2.25 | % | |||
Less than 3.00 to 1.00 | 1.00 | % | 2.00 | % | 2.00 | % |
Based on our forecasted leverage ratio of 4.00 to 1.00 for 2012, we expect the margin for the interest rate and letter of credit fee to be in line with the applicable rates above. The credit facility does not have a floor for the Base Rate or the Eurodollar Rate.
The amended credit facility includes financial covenants that are tested on a quarterly basis, based on the rolling four-quarter period that ends on the last day of each fiscal quarter. The maximum permitted leverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, but generally computed as the ratio of total secured funded debt to consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges) is 5.00 to 1.00. The minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio (as defined in the credit facility, but generally computed as the ratio of consolidated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and certain other non-cash charges to consolidated interest charges) is as follows:
In addition, the credit facility contains various covenants that, among other restrictions, limit our ability to:
The credit facility permits the Partnership to make quarterly distributions to unitholders so long as no default exists under the credit facility.
Each of the following is an event of default under the credit facility:
If an event of default relating to bankruptcy or other insolvency events occurs, all indebtedness under the credit facility will immediately become due and payable. If any other event of default exists under the credit facility, the lenders may accelerate the maturity of the obligations outstanding under the credit facility and exercise other rights and remedies. In addition, if any event of default exists under the credit facility, the lenders may commence foreclosure or other actions against the collateral.
If any default occurs under the credit facility, or if the Partnership is unable to make any of the representations and warranties in the credit facility, the Partnership will be unable to borrow funds or have letters of credit issued under the credit facility.
The Partnership expects to be in compliance with the covenants in the credit facility for at least the next twelve months.
Series B Secured Note. On October 20, 2009, the Partnership acquired the Eunice natural gas liquids processing plant and fractionation facility which included an $18.1 million series B secured note. We paid $11.0 million of principal on the series B secured note in May 2010 and paid the remaining $7.1 million in May 2011.
Senior Unsecured Notes. On February 10, 2010, we issued $725.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior unsecured notes (the “notes”) due on February 15, 2018 at an issue price of 97.907% to yield 9.25% to maturity including the original issue discount (OID). Net proceeds from the sale of the notes of $689.7 million (net of transaction costs and OID), together with borrowings under the credit facility discussed above, were used to repay in full amounts outstanding under the prior bank credit facility and senior secured notes and to pay related fees, costs and expenses, including the settlement of interest rate swaps associated with the prior credit facility. Interest payments on the notes are due semi-annually in arrears in February and August.
The indenture governing the notes contains covenants that, among other things, limit the Partnership's ability and the ability of certain of its subsidiaries to:
The indenture provides that if the Partnership's fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of consolidated cash flow to fixed charges, which generally represents the ratio of adjusted EBITDA to interest charges with further adjustments as defined per the indenture) for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters is not less than 2.0 to 1.0, the Partnership will be permitted to pay distributions to its unitholders in an amount equal to available cash from operating surplus (each as defined in our partnership agreement) with respect to its preceding fiscal quarter plus a number of items, including the net cash proceeds received by the Partnership as a capital contribution or from the issuance of equity interests since the date of the indenture, to the extent not previously expended. If the Partnership's fixed charge coverage ratio is less than 2.0 to 1.0, the Partnership will be able to pay distributions to its unitholders in an amount equal to an $80.0 million basket (less amounts previously expended pursuant to such basket), plus the same number of items discussed in the preceding sentence to the extent not previously expended. The Partnership was in compliance with this ratio as of December 31, 2011.
If the notes achieve an investment grade rating from each of Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Ratings Services, many of the covenants discussed above will terminate. Our current ratings on our bonds from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and Standard & Poor's Rating Services are B1 and B+, respectively.
The Partnership may redeem up to 35% of the notes at any time prior to February 15, 2013 with the cash proceeds from equity offerings at a redemption price of 108.875% of the principal amount of the notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date) provided that:
Prior to February 15, 2014, the Partnership may redeem the notes, in whole or in part, at a “make-whole” redemption price. On or after February 15, 2014, the Partnership may redeem all or a part of the notes at redemption prices (expressed as percentages of principal amount) equal to 104.438% for the twelve-month period beginning on February 15, 2014, 102.219% for the twelve-month period beginning February 15, 2015 and 100.00% for the twelve-month period beginning on February 15, 2016 and at any time thereafter, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the applicable redemption date on the notes.
Each of the following is an event of default under the indenture:
If an event of default relating to bankruptcy or other insolvency events occurs, the senior unsecured notes will immediately become due and payable. If any other event of default exists under the indenture, the trustee under the indenture or the holders of the senior unsecured notes may accelerate the maturity of the senior unsecured notes and exercise other rights and remedies.
Non Guarantors. The senior unsecured notes are jointly and severally guaranteed by each of the Partnership's current material subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”), with the exception of our regulated Louisiana subsidiaries (which may only guarantee up to $500.0 million of the Partnership's debt), CDC (our joint venture in Denton County, Texas not 100% owned by the Partnership) and Crosstex Energy Finance Corporation (a wholly owned Delaware corporation that was organized for the sole purpose of being a co-issuer of certain of the Partnership's indebtedness, including the senior unsecured notes). Guarantors may not sell or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of their properties or assets to, or consolidate with or merge into another company if such a sale would cause a default under the terms of the senior unsecured notes. Since certain wholly owned subsidiaries do not guarantee the senior unsecured notes, the condensed consolidating financial statements of the guarantors and non-guarantors as of and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 are disclosed below in accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X.
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||||||
Total current assets | $ | 189,410 | $ | 13,346 | $ | - | $ | 202,756 | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 1,026,537 | 215,364 | - | 1,241,901 | |||||||||
Total other assets | 510,671 | 3 | - | 510,674 | |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,726,618 | $ | 228,713 | $ | - | $ | 1,955,331 | |||||
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | |||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | $ | 220,811 | $ | 4,541 | $ | - | $ | 225,352 | |||||
Long-term debt | 798,409 | - | - | 798,409 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 31,111 | - | - | 31,111 | |||||||||
Partners’ capital | 676,287 | 224,172 | - | 900,459 | |||||||||
Total liabilities & partners’ capital | $ | 1,726,618 | $ | 228,713 | $ | - | $ | 1,955,331 |
December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
ASSETS | |||||||||||||
Total current assets | $ | 229,997 | $ | 12,983 | $ | - | $ | 242,980 | |||||
Property, plant and equipment, net | 987,018 | 228,086 | - | 1,215,104 | |||||||||
Total other assets | 526,853 | 3 | - | 526,856 | |||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,743,868 | $ | 241,072 | $ | - | $ | 1,984,940 | |||||
LIABILITIES & PARTNERS’ CAPITAL | |||||||||||||
Total current liabilities | $ | 254,460 | $ | 6,160 | $ | - | $ | 260,620 | |||||
Long-term debt | 711,512 | - | - | 711,512 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities | 35,872 | - | - | 35,872 | |||||||||
Partners’ capital | 742,024 | 234,912 | - | 976,936 | |||||||||
Total liabilities & partners’ capital | $ | 1,743,868 | $ | 241,072 | $ | - | $ | 1,984,940 |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations | |||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,954,612 | $ | 86,577 | $ | (27,247) | $ | 2,013,942 | |||||
Total operating costs and expenses | (1,925,234) | (38,693) | 27,247 | (1,936,680) | |||||||||
Operating income | 29,378 | 47,884 | 0 | 77,262 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net | (79,230) | (3) | 0 | (79,233) | |||||||||
Other income | 707 | 0 | 0 | 707 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | |||||||||||||
before non-controlling interest and | |||||||||||||
income taxes | (49,145) | 47,881 | 0 | (1,264) | |||||||||
Income tax provision | (1,110) | (16) | 0 | (1,126) | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, | |||||||||||||
Less: Net loss attributable to | |||||||||||||
non-controlling interest | 0 | (48) | 0 | (48) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to | |||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. | $ | (50,255) | $ | 47,913 | $ | 0 | $ | (2,342) |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,733,273 | $ | 84,028 | $ | (24,625) | $ | 1,792,676 | |||||
Total operating costs and expenses | (1,704,250) | (36,306) | 24,625 | (1,715,931) | |||||||||
Operating income | 29,023 | 47,722 | 0 | 76,745 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net | (87,029) | (6) | 0 | (87,035) | |||||||||
Other loss | (14,418) | 0 | 0 | (14,418) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | |||||||||||||
before non-controlling interest and | |||||||||||||
income taxes | (72,424) | 47,716 | 0 | (24,708) | |||||||||
Income tax provision | (1,110) | (11) | 0 | (1,121) | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, | |||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to | |||||||||||||
non-controlling interest | 0 | 19 | 0 | 19 | |||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to | |||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. | $ | (73,534) | $ | 47,686 | $ | 0 | $ | (25,848) |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Total revenues | $ | 1,541,854 | $ | 75,048 | $ | (33,351) | $ | 1,583,551 | |||||
Total operating costs and expenses | (1,562,084) | (32,166) | 33,351 | (1,560,899) | |||||||||
Operating income (loss) | (20,230) | 42,882 | 0 | 22,652 | |||||||||
Interest expense, net | (95,078) | 0 | 0 | (95,078) | |||||||||
Other loss | (3,269) | 0 | 0 | (3,269) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | |||||||||||||
before non-controlling interest and | |||||||||||||
income taxes | (118,577) | 42,882 | 0 | (75,695) | |||||||||
Income tax provision | (1,770) | (20) | 0 | (1,790) | |||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, | |||||||||||||
net of tax | 181,951 | 0 | 0 | 181,951 | |||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to | |||||||||||||
non-controlling interest | 0 | 60 | 0 | 60 | |||||||||
Net income attributable to | |||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. | $ | 61,604 | $ | 42,802 | $ | 0 | $ | 104,406 |
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flow | |||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by | |||||||||||||
operating activities | $ | 81,883 | $ | 61,689 | $ | 0 | $ | 143,572 | |||||
Net cash flows used in | |||||||||||||
investing activities | $ | (129,806) | $ | (2,288) | $ | 0 | $ | (132,094) | |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) | |||||||||||||
financing activities | $ | (5,032) | $ | (58,606) | $ | 58,606 | $ | (5,032) |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by | |||||||||||||
operating activities | $ | 28,208 | $ | 58,979 | $ | 0 | $ | 87,187 | |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) | |||||||||||||
investing activities | $ | 21,353 | $ | (6,715) | $ | 0 | $ | 14,638 | |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) | |||||||||||||
financing activities | $ | (84,562) | $ | (52,501) | $ | 52,156 | $ | (84,907) |
For the Year Ended December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||
Guarantors | Non Guarantors | Elimination | Consolidated | ||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Net cash flows provided by | |||||||||||||
operating activities | $ | 31,194 | $ | 49,784 | $ | - | $ | 80,978 | |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) | |||||||||||||
investing activities | $ | 402,464 | $ | (22,590) | $ | - | $ | 379,874 | |||||
Net cash flows provided by (used in) | |||||||||||||
financing activities | $ | (461,372) | $ | (27,194) | $ | 26,857 | $ | (461,709) |
|
(5) Other Long-Term Liabilities
The Partnership entered into 9 and 10-year capital leases for certain compressor equipment. Assets under capital leases are summarized as follows (in thousands):
Years ended December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Compression equipment | $ | 37,199 | $ | 37,199 | |||
Less: Accumulated amortization | (10,361) | (6,910) | |||||
Net assets under capital lease | $ | 26,838 | $ | 30,289 | |||
The following are the minimum lease payments to be made in each of the following years indicated for the capital lease in effect as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands): | |||||||
Fiscal Year | |||
2012 through 2016 ($4,582 annually) | $ | 22,910 | |
Thereafter | 12,100 | ||
Less: Interest | (6,643) | ||
Net minimum lease payments under capital lease | 28,367 | ||
Less: Current portion of net minimum lease payments | (4,448) | ||
Long-term portion of net minimum lease payments | $ | 23,919 |
|
(6) Income Taxes
The Partnership is generally not subject to income taxes, except as discussed below, because its income is taxed directly to its partners. The net tax basis in the Partnership's assets and liabilities is less than the reported amounts on the financial statements by approximately $611.1 million as of December 31, 2011. The Partnership is subject to the margin tax enacted by the state of Texas on May 1, 2006.
The LIG entities the Partnership formed to acquire the stock of LIG Pipeline Company and its subsidiaries, are treated as taxable corporations for income tax purposes. The entity structure was formed to effect the matching of the tax cost to the Partnership of a step-up in the basis of the assets to fair market value with the recognition of benefits of the step-up by the Partnership. A deferred tax liability of $8.2 million was recorded at the acquisition date. The deferred tax liability represents future taxes payable on the difference between the fair value and tax basis of the assets acquired.
The Partnership provides for income taxes using the liability method. Accordingly, deferred taxes are recorded for the differences between the tax and book basis that will reverse in future periods (in thousands).
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Current tax provision | $ | 1,771 | $ | 1,517 | $ | 2,258 | ||||
Deferred tax (benefit) | (645) | (396) | (468) | |||||||
Income tax provision on continuing operations | 1,126 | 1,121 | 1,790 | |||||||
Income tax provision on discontinued operations (all current) | - | 0 | 1,136 | |||||||
Tax provision | $ | 1,126 | $ | 1,121 | $ | 2,926 | ||||
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes is as follows (in thousands): | ||||||||||
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Federal income tax on taxable corporation at statutory rate (35%) | $ | 199 | $ | 43 | $ | 200 | ||||
State income taxes, net | 927 | 1,078 | 2,726 | |||||||
Income tax provision | $ | 1,126 | $ | 1,121 | $ | 2,926 |
The principal component of the Partnership's net deferred tax liability is as follows (in thousands): | ||||||||||
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax assets: | ||||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities: | ||||||||||
Property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets-current | $ | (501) | $ | (501) | ||||||
Property, plant, equipment, and intangible assets-long-term | (7,192) | (7,837) | ||||||||
$ | (7,693) | $ | (8,338) | |||||||
Net deferred tax liability | $ | (7,693) | $ | (8,338) | ||||||
A net current deferred tax liability of $0.5 million is included in other current liabilities. |
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands): | ||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2009 | $ | 3,124 | ||||||||
Increases related to prior year tax positions | 110 | |||||||||
Increases related to current year tax positions | 470 | |||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2010 | $ | 3,704 | ||||||||
Decreases related to prior year tax positions | (8) | |||||||||
Increases related to current year tax positions | 517 | |||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2011 | $ | 4,213 |
Unrecognized tax benefits of $4.2 million, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate. It is unknown when the uncertain tax position will be resolved.
Per company accounting policy election, $0.1 million of penalties and interest related to prior year tax positions was recorded to income tax expense in 2011. In the event interest or penalties are incurred with respect to income tax matters, our policy will be to include such items in income tax expense. As of December 31, 2011, tax years 2008 through 2011 remain subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and tax years 2007 through 2011 remain subject to examination by various state taxing authorities.
|
(7) Partners' Capital
(a) Sale of Preferred Units
On January 19, 2010, the Partnership issued approximately $125.0 million of Series A Convertible Preferred Units to an affiliate of Blackstone/GSO Capital Solutions for net proceeds of $120.8 million. The general partner of the Partnership made a contribution of $2.6 million in connection with the issuance to maintain its 2% general partner interest. The 14,705,882 preferred units are convertible by the holders thereof at any time into common units on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain adjustments in the event of certain dilutive issuances of common units. The Partnership has the right to force conversion of the preferred units after three years from the issue date if (i) the daily volume-weighted average trading price of the common units is greater than $12.75 per unit for 20 out of the trailing 30 trading days ending on two trading days before the date on which the Partnership delivers notice of such conversion, and (ii) the average daily trading volume of common units must have exceeded 250,000 common units for 20 out of the trailing 30 trading days ending on two trading days before the date on which the Partnership delivers notice of such conversion. The preferred units are not redeemable, but are entitled to a quarterly distribution that will be the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. Such quarterly distribution may be paid in cash, in additional preferred units issued in kind or any combination thereof, provided that the distribution may not be paid in additional preferred units if the Partnership pays cash distribution on common units. During 2011 and 2010, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions on its preferred units of $17.2 million and $9.9 million, respectively. A distribution on the preferred units of $4.7 million has been declared for the three months ended December 31, 2011 and was paid in February 2012.
The preferred units were issued at a discount to the market price of the common units they are convertible into. This discount totaling $22.3 million represents a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) and is reflected as a reduction in common unit equity and an increase in preferred equity to reflect the market value of the preferred units at issuance on the Partnership's consolidated statement of changes in partners' equity for the year ended December 31, 2010. The impact of the BCF is also included in earnings per unit for the year ended December 31, 2010.
(b) Senior Subordinated Series D Units
On March 23, 2007, the Partnership issued an aggregate of 3,875,340 senior subordinated series D units representing limited partner interests of the Partnership in a private offering. These senior subordinated series D units converted into common units representing limited partner interest of the Partnership on March 23, 2009. Since the Partnership did not make distribution of available cash from operating surplus, as defined in the partnership agreement, of at least $0.62 per unit on each outstanding common unit for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, each senior subordinated series D unit converted into 1.05 common units for a total issuance of 4,069,106 common units.
(c) Cash Distributions
Unless restricted by the terms of the Partnership's credit facility and/or senior unsecured note indenture, the Partnership must make distributions of 100% of available cash, as defined in the partnership agreement, within 45 days following the end of each quarter. As described under (a) Sale of Preferred Units above, the preferred units are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. The general partner is not entitled to a 2% distribution with respect to the quarterly preferred distribution of $0.2125 per unit that is made solely to the preferred unitholders. The general partner is entitled to a 2% distribution with respect to all distributions made to common unitholders. If the distributions are in excess of $0.2125 per unit, distributions are made 98% to the common and preferred unitholders and 2% to the general partner, subject to the payment of incentive distributions as described below to the extent that certain target levels of cash distributions are achieved.
Under the quarterly incentive distribution provisions, generally the Partnership's general partner is entitled to 13% of amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.25 per unit, 23% of the amounts the Partnership distributes in excess of $0.3125 per unit and 48% of amounts the Partnership distributes distribute in excess of $0.375 per unit. Incentive distributions totaling $2.4 million and $0.1 million were earned by our general partner for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Partnership paid annual distributions per common unit of $1.17, $0.25 and $0.25 in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The Partnership increased its fourth quarter distribution on its common units to $0.32 per unit which was paid February 11, 2012.
(d) Earnings per Unit and Dilution Computations
The Partnership had common units and preferred units outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and common units and senior subordinated series D units outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2009. The senior subordinated series D units, which converted to common units in March 2009, were considered common securities prior to conversion but were presented as a separate class of common equity because they did not participate in cash distributions during their subordination period. The senior subordinated series D units were issued in March 2007 at a discount, referred to as BCF, totaling $34.3 million to the market price of the common units they were convertible into at the end of their subordination period. Since the conversion of the senior subordinated series D units into common units was contingent until the end of their subordination period, the BCF was not recognized until the end of such subordination period when the criteria for conversion was met. The BCFs attributable to both the senior subordinated series D units and the preferred units, discussed under (a) Sale of Preferred Units above, represent non-cash distributions that are treated in the same way as a cash distribution for earnings per unit computations.
The preferred units are entitled to a quarterly distribution equal to the greater of $0.2125 per unit or the amount of the quarterly distribution per unit paid to common unitholders, subject to certain adjustments. Income is allocated to the preferred units in an amount equal to the quarterly distribution with respect to the period earned.
As required under FASB ASC 260-10-45-61A unvested share-based payments that entitle employees to receive non-forfeitable distributions are considered participating securities, as defined in FASB ASC 260-10-20, for earnings per unit calculations. The following table reflects the computation of basic earnings per limited partner units for the periods presented (in thousands except per unit amounts):
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Limited partners’ interest in net income (loss) | $ | (19,698) | $ | (57,506) | $ | 105,225 | ||||
Distributed earnings allocated to: | ||||||||||
Common units (1) | $ | 62,238 | $ | 25,606 | $ | 11,234 | ||||
Unvested restricted units | 1,187 | 545 | 134 | |||||||
Senior subordinated series D units (2) | - | - | 34,297 | |||||||
Total distributed earnings | $ | 63,425 | $ | 26,151 | $ | 45,665 | ||||
Undistributed earnings allocated to: | ||||||||||
Common units (3) | $ | (81,616) | $ | (81,703) | $ | 58,220 | ||||
Unvested restricted units (3) | (1,507) | (1,954) | 1,340 | |||||||
Total undistributed earnings (loss) | $ | (83,123) | $ | (83,657) | $ | 59,560 | ||||
Net income (loss) allocated to: | ||||||||||
Common units | $ | (19,377) | $ | (56,097) | $ | 69,454 | ||||
Unvested restricted units | (321) | (1,409) | 1,474 | |||||||
Senior subordinated series D units | - | - | 34,297 | |||||||
Total limited partners' interest in net income (loss) | $ | (19,698) | $ | (57,506) | $ | 105,225 | ||||
Limited Partners' interest in income from discontinued operations: | ||||||||||
Common units | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 174,278 | ||||
Unvested restricted units | - | - | 4,034 | |||||||
Total income from discontinued operation (4) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 178,312 | ||||
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit from continuing operations: | ||||||||||
Common units | $ | (0.38) | $ | (1.12) | $ | (2.18) | ||||
Senior subordinated series D units | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 8.85 | ||||
Basic and diluted net income per unit from discontinuing operations: | ||||||||||
Basic common unit | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 3.62 | ||||
Diluted common units | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 3.52 | ||||
Total basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit: | ||||||||||
Basic common unit | $ | (0.38) | $ | (1.12) | $ | 1.44 | ||||
Diluted common units | $ | (0.38) | $ | (1.12) | $ | 1.40 | ||||
Senior subordinated series D units | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 8.85 |
The following are the unit amounts used to compute the basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per unit: | ||||||||||
Weighted average limited partner common units outstanding | 50,590 | 49,960 | 48,161 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per unit: | ||||||||||
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding | 50,590 | 49,960 | 48,161 | |||||||
Dilutive effect of restricted units issued | - | - | 433 | |||||||
Dilutive effect of senior subordinated units | - | - | 871 | |||||||
Dilutive effect of exercise of options outstanding | - | - | 2 | |||||||
Dilutive weighted average limited partner common units outstanding | 50,590 | 49,960 | 49,467 | |||||||
Weighted average diluted senior subordinated Series D units outstanding | - | - | 3,875 |
All outstanding units were included in the computation of diluted earnings per unit and weighted based on the number of days such units were outstanding during the period presented. All common unit equivalents were antidilutive for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 because the limited partners were allocated a net loss in these periods.
When quarterly distributions are made pro-rata to common and preferred unitholders, net income for the general partner consists of incentive distributions to the extent earned, a deduction for stock-based compensation attributable to CEI's stock options and restricted shares and 2% of the original Partnership's net income (loss) adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner. When quarterly distributions are made solely to the preferred unitholders, the net income for the general partner consists of the CEI stock-based compensation deduction and 2% of the Partnership's net income (loss) after the allocation of income to the preferred unitholders with respect to their preferred distribution adjusted for the CEI stock-based compensation specifically allocated to the general partner. The net income (loss) allocated to the general partner is as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Income allocation for incentive distributions | $ | 2,372 | $ | 99 | $ | - | ||||
Stock-based compensation attributable to CEI's stock options | ||||||||||
and restricted shares | (3,119) | (3,906) | (2,966) | |||||||
2% general partner interest in net income (loss) | 15 | (564) | 2,147 | |||||||
General partner share of net income (loss) | $ | (732) | $ | (4,371) | $ | (819) |
|
(8) Retirement Plans
The Partnership sponsors a single employer 401(k) plan for employees who become eligible upon the date of hire. The plan allows for contributions to be made at each compensation calculation period based on the annual discretionary contribution rate. Contributions of $2.5 million, $2.3 million, and $3.1 million were made to the plan for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
(9) Employee Incentive Plans
(a) Long-Term Incentive Plans
The Partnership's managing general partner has a long-term incentive plan for its employees, directors, and affiliates who perform services for the Partnership. The plan currently permits the grant of awards covering an aggregate of 5,600,000 common unit options and restricted units. The plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Partnership's managing general partner's board of directors. The units issued upon exercise or vesting are newly issued units.
(b) Restricted Units
A restricted unit is a “phantom” unit that entitles the grantee to receive a common unit upon the vesting of the phantom unit, or in the discretion of the compensation committee, cash equivalent to the value of a common unit. In addition, the restricted units will become exercisable upon a change of control of the Partnership, its general partner.
The restricted units are intended to serve as a means of incentive compensation for performance and not primarily as an opportunity to participate in the equity appreciation of the common units. Therefore, plan participants will not pay any consideration for the common units they receive and the Partnership will receive no remuneration for the units. The restricted units include a tandem award that entitles the participant to receive cash payments equal to the cash distributions made by the Partnership with respect to its outstanding common units until the restriction period is terminated or the restricted units are forfeited. The restricted units granted in 2011, 2010 and 2009 generally cliff vest after three years of service.
The restricted units are valued at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of common units on such date. A summary of the restricted unit activity for the year ended December 31, 2011 is provided below:
Weighted | |||||||
Average | |||||||
Number of | Grant-Date | ||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: | Units | Fair Value | |||||
Non-vested, beginning of period | 1,047,374 | $ | 10.30 | ||||
Granted | 385,571 | 15.39 | |||||
Vested* | (410,418) | 14.48 | |||||
Forfeited | (72,683) | 11.72 | |||||
Non-vested, end of period | 949,844 | $ | 10.45 | ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands) | $ | 15,406 | |||||
_________________________ | |||||||
* Vested units include 116,458 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees. | |||||||
A summary of the restricted units' aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of units vested (market value at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are provided below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Restricted Units: | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of units vested | $ | 6,438 | $ | 11,076 | $ | 1,023 | |||
Fair value of units vested | $ | 5,945 | $ | 5,785 | $ | 4,158 | |||
As of December 31, 2011, there was $5.6 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years. | |||||||||
(c) Unit Options
Unit options will have an exercise price that is not less than the fair market value of the units on the date of grant. In general, unit options granted will become exercisable over a period determined by the compensation committee. In addition, unit options will become exercisable upon a change in control of the Partnership or its general partner.
The fair value of each unit option award is estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton model. This model is based on the assumptions summarized below. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Partnership's traded common units. The Partnership has used historical data to estimate share option exercise and employee departure behavior to estimate expected forfeiture rates. The expected life of unit options represents the period of time that unit options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the expected term of the unit option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The Partnership used the simplified method to calculate the expected term.
Unit options are generally awarded with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Partnership's common units at the date of grant. The unit options granted in 2009 generally vest based on 3 years of service (one-third after each year of service). There were no options granted in 2011 or 2010. The following weighted average assumptions were used for the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model for grants in 2009:
Years ended December 31, 2009 | |||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options Granted: | |||||
Weighted average distribution yield | - | % | |||
Weighted average expected volatility | 76.2 | % | |||
Weighted average risk free interest rate | 2.34 | % | |||
Weighted average expected life | 6 years | ||||
Weighted average contractual life | 10 years | ||||
Weighted average of fair value of unit options granted | $ | 2.89 | |||
A summary of the unit option activity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below: | |||||
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Number of | Average | Number of | Average | ||||||||||||||
Units | Exercise Price | Units | Exercise Price | Units | Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of period | 611,311 | $ | 6.77 | 882,836 | $ | 6.43 | 1,304,194 | $ | 30.64 | ||||||||||
Granted (a) | - | 0.00 | - | 0.00 | 636,122 | 4.46 | |||||||||||||
Issued in Exchange | - | 0.00 | - | 0.00 | 344,319 | 4.80 | |||||||||||||
Rendered in Exchange | - | 0.00 | - | 0.00 | (1,032,403) | 31.34 | |||||||||||||
Exercised | (128,477) | 4.61 | (198,725) | 4.48 | (2,013) | 4.08 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited | (31,260) | 12.83 | (67,183) | 9.27 | (328,295) | 27.51 | |||||||||||||
Expired | - | 0.00 | (5,617) | 5.37 | (39,088) | 30.30 | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of period | 451,574 | $ | 6.99 | 611,311 | $ | 6.77 | 882,836 | $ | 6.43 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable at end of period | 315,742 | $ | 7.42 | 278,214 | $ | 7.78 | 159,929 | $ | 12.51 | ||||||||||
Weighted average contractual term (years) end of period: | |||||||||||||||||||
Options outstanding | 7.2 | 0.0 | 8.2 | - | 8.7 | - | |||||||||||||
Options exercisable | 6.9 | 0.0 | 7.6 | - | 4.5 | - | |||||||||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value end of period (in thousands): | |||||||||||||||||||
Options outstanding | $ | 4,648 | 0 | $ | 5,350 | - | $ | 3,143 | - | ||||||||||
Options exercisable | $ | 3,260 | 0 | $ | 2,463 | - | $ | 336 | - |
In May 2009, the Partnership's unitholders approved an amendment to the Partnership's long-term incentive plan to allow an option exchange program. This option exchange program was offered to all eligible employees excluding executive officers and directors because options held by employees were “underwater,” meaning the exercise price of the options were higher than the current market price of the common units. The terms of the offer included an exchange ratio of 3 old options for 1 replacement option with an exercise price of $4.80 per common unit (120% of the average closing sales price for five trading days prior to the date of grant) which will vest over 2 years (50% after year 1 and 50% after year 2). In June 2009, a total of 453 employees elected to exchange 1,032,403 old options for 344,319 replacement options pursuant to this option exchange program. There was no incremental compensation cost resulting from the modifications under this option exchange program.
A summary of the unit options intrinsic value exercised (market value in excess of exercise price at date of exercise) and fair value of units vested (value per Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. Unit Options: | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Intrinsic value of units options exercised | $ | 1,527 | $ | 1,470 | $ | 5 | |||
Fair value of unit options vested | $ | 563 | $ | 764 | $ | 1,675 | |||
As of December 31, 2011, there was $0.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested unit options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1 year. | |||||||||
(d) Crosstex Energy, Inc.'s Restricted Stock
The Crosstex Energy, Inc. long-term incentive plan provides for the award of restricted stock (collectively, “Awards”) for up to 7,190,000 shares of Crosstex Energy, Inc.'s common stock. As of January 1, 2012, approximately 1,642,396 shares remained available under the long-term incentive plans for future issuance to participants. The maximum number of shares set forth above are subject to appropriate adjustment in the event of a recapitalization of the capital structure of Crosstex Energy, Inc. or reorganization of Crosstex Energy, Inc. Awards that are forfeited, terminated or expire unexercised become immediately available for additional awards under the long-term incentive plan.
CEI's restricted shares are included at their fair value at the date of grant which is equal to the market value of the common stock on such date. CEI's restricted stock granted in 2011, 2010 and 2009 generally cliff vest after three years of service. A summary of the restricted stock activity which includes officers and employees of the Partnership and directors of CELP for the year ended December 31, 2011, is provided below:
Weighted | |||||||
Average | |||||||
Number of | Grant-Date | ||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: | Shares | Fair Value | |||||
Non-vested, beginning of period | 1,108,998 | $ | 8.64 | ||||
Granted | 617,347 | 9.44 | |||||
Vested* | (412,185) | 13.64 | |||||
Forfeited | (92,809) | 8.01 | |||||
Non-vested, end of period | 1,221,351 | $ | 7.40 | ||||
Aggregate intrinsic value, end of period (in thousands) | $ | 15,438 | |||||
___________________________ | |||||||
* Vested units include 113,021 units withheld for payroll taxes paid on behalf of employees. |
A summary of the restricted shares' aggregate intrinsic value (market value at vesting date) and fair value of shares vested (market value at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Restricted Shares: | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value of shares vested | $ | 3,915 | $ | 3,163 | $ | 1,038 | |||
Fair value of shares vested | $ | 5,623 | $ | 4,388 | $ | 4,382 |
As of December 31, 2011 there was $5.2 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to CEI restricted shares for directors, officers and employees. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years. |
(e) Crosstex Energy, Inc.'s Stock Options
CEI stock options have not been granted since 2005. A summary of the stock option activity includes officers and employees of the Partnership and directors of CEI for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below:
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||
Number of | Average | Number of | Average | Number of | Average | ||||||||||||||
Units | Exercise Price | Units | Exercise Price | Units | Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding, beginning of period | 37,500 | $ | 6.50 | 67,500 | $ | 9.54 | 67,500 | $ | 9.54 | ||||||||||
Forfeited | - | - | (30,000) | 13.33 | - | - | |||||||||||||
Outstanding, end of period | 37,500 | $ | 6.50 | 37,500 | $ | 6.50 | 67,500 | $ | 9.54 | ||||||||||
Options exercisable at end of period | 37,500 | $ | 6.50 | 37,500 | $ | 6.50 | 67,500 | $ | 9.54 | ||||||||||
A summary of the share options' intrinsic value (market value in excess of exercise price at date of exercise) exercised and fair value of units vested (value per Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model at date of grant) during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is provided below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||
Crosstex Energy, Inc. Stock Options: | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Fair value of units vested | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 49 |
|
(10) Derivatives
Interest Rate Swaps
The Partnership did have any interest rate swaps during the year ended December 31, 2011.
The impact of the interest rate swaps on net income is included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations as part of interest expense, net, as follows (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge | |||||||
accounting | $ | 22,405 | $ | 797 | |||
Realized losses on derivatives | (26,542) | (19,044) | |||||
Loss on interest rate swaps included in continuing operations | $ | (4,137) | $ | (18,247) |
Commodity Swaps
The Partnership manages its exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices by hedging the impact of market fluctuations. Swaps are used to manage and hedge prices and location risk related to these market exposures. Swaps are also used to manage margins on offsetting fixed-price purchase or sale commitments for physical quantities of natural gas and NGLs.
The Partnership commonly enters into various derivative financial transactions which it does not designate as hedges. These transactions include “swing swaps,” “third party on-system financial swaps,” “storage swaps,” “basis swaps,” “processing margin swaps” and “put options”. Swing swaps are generally short-term in nature (one month), and are usually entered into to protect against changes in the volume of daily versus first-of-month index priced gas supplies or markets. Third party on-system financial swaps are hedges that the Partnership enters into on behalf of its customers who are connected to its systems, wherein the Partnership fixes a supply or market price for a period of time for its customers, and simultaneously enters into the derivative transaction. Storage swap transactions protect against changes in the value of gas that the Partnership has stored to serve various operational requirements. Basis swaps are used to hedge basis location price risk due to buying gas into one of our systems on one index and selling gas off that same system on a different index. Processing margin financial swaps are used to hedge fractionation spread risk at our processing plants relating to the option to process versus bypassing our equity gas. Put options are purchased to hedge against declines in pricing and as such represent options, not obligations, to sell the related underlying volumes at a fixed price.
The components of (gain) loss on derivatives in the consolidated statements of operations relating to commodity swaps are (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives that do not qualify for hedge | ||||||||||
accounting | $ | 726 | $ | 1,003 | $ | 2,816 | ||||
Realized (gains) losses on derivatives | 7,015 | 7,955 | (6,139) | |||||||
Ineffective portion of derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting | (158) | 142 | 65 | |||||||
Net (gains) losses related to commodity swaps | $ | 7,583 | $ | 9,100 | $ | (3,258) | ||||
Put option premium mark to market | 193 | - | - | |||||||
Net losses included in income from discontinued operations | - | - | 264 | |||||||
(Gains) losses on derivatives included in continuing operations | $ | 7,776 | $ | 9,100 | $ | (2,994) |
The fair value of derivative assets and liabilities relating to commodity swaps are as follows (in thousands): | |||||||
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Fair value of derivative assets — current, designated | $ | 151 | $ | 1 | |||
Fair value of derivative assets — current, non-designated | 2,716 | 5,522 | |||||
Fair value of derivative assets — long term, non-designated | - | 1,169 | |||||
Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, designated | (702) | (1,066) | |||||
Fair value of derivative liabilities — current, non-designated | (4,885) | (6,914) | |||||
Fair value of derivative liabilities — long term, non-designated | - | (1,156) | |||||
Net fair value of derivatives | $ | (2,720) | $ | (2,444) |
Set forth below is the summarized notional volumes and fair value of all instruments held for price risk management purposes and related physical offsets at December 31, 2011 (all gas volumes are expressed in MMBtu's and liquids volumes are expressed in gallons). The remaining term of the contracts extend no later than December 2012. Changes in the fair value of the Partnership's mark to market derivatives are recorded in earnings in the period the transaction is entered into. The effective portion of changes in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income until the related anticipated future cash flow is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portion is recorded in earnings immediately.
December 31, 2011 | ||||||
Transaction Type | Volume | Fair Value | ||||
(In thousands) | ||||||
Cash Flow Hedges:* | ||||||
Liquids swaps (short contracts) | (7,876) | $ | (551) | |||
Total swaps designated as cash flow hedges | $ | (551) | ||||
Mark to Market Derivatives:* | ||||||
Swing swaps (short contracts) | (1,600) | $ | (1) | |||
Physical offsets to swing swap transactions (long contracts) | 1,600 | (6) | ||||
Basis swaps (long contracts) | 5,635 | 1,341 | ||||
Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (short contracts) | (1,116) | 3,102 | ||||
Basis swaps (short contracts) | (5,635) | (1,348) | ||||
Physical offsets to basis swap transactions (long contracts) | 1,085 | (3,282) | ||||
Processing margin hedges — liquids (short contracts) | (14,338) | (294) | ||||
Processing margin hedges — gas (long contracts) | 1,620 | (2,301) | ||||
Processing margin hedges — gas (short contracts) | (187) | 163 | ||||
Storage swap transactions (long contracts) | 70 | (5) | ||||
Storage swap transactions (short contracts) | (360) | 462 | ||||
Total mark to market derivatives | $ | (2,169) |
* All are gas contracts, volume in MMBtu's, except for processing margin hedges — liquids and liquids swaps (volume in gallons).
On all transactions where the Partnership is exposed to counterparty risk, the Partnership analyzes the counterparty's financial condition prior to entering into an agreement, establishes limits and monitors the appropriateness of these limits on an ongoing basis. The Partnership primarily deals with two types of counterparties, financial institutions and other energy companies, when entering into financial derivatives on commodities. The Partnership has entered into Master International Swaps and Derivatives Association Agreements that allow for netting of swap contract receivables and payables in the event of default by either party. If the Partnership's counterparties failed to perform under existing swap contracts, the Partnership's maximum loss as of December 31, 2011 of $5.9 million would be reduced to $3.9 million due to the netting feature.
Impact of Cash Flow Hedges
The impact of realized gains or losses from derivatives designated as cash flow hedge contracts in the consolidated statements of operations is summarized below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in Midstream revenue | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Natural gas | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 2,156 | ||||
Liquids | (2,772) | (1,733) | 9,707 | |||||||
Realized (gain) loss included in income from discontinued operations | - | - | (759) | |||||||
$ | (2,772) | $ | (1,733) | $ | 11,104 |
Natural Gas
As of December 31, 2011, the Partnership has no balances in accumulated other comprehensive income related to natural gas.
Liquids
As of December 31, 2011, an unrealized derivative fair value net loss of $0.5 million related to cash flow hedges of liquids price risk was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Of this net amount, a $0.5 million loss is expected to be reclassified into earnings through December 2012. The actual reclassification to earnings will be based on mark to market prices at the contract settlement date, along with the realization of the gain or loss on the related physical volume, which amount is not reflected above.
Derivatives Other Than Cash Flow Hedges
Assets and liabilities related to third party derivative contracts, swing swaps, basis swaps, storage swaps and processing margin swaps are included in the fair value of derivative assets and liabilities and the profit and loss on the mark to market value of these contracts are recorded net as (gain) loss on derivatives in the consolidated statement of operations. The Partnership estimates the fair value of all of its energy trading contracts using actively quoted prices. The estimated fair value of energy trading contracts by maturity date was as follows (in thousands):
Maturity Periods | ||||||||||||
Less than one year | One to two years | More than two years | Total fair value | |||||||||
December 31, 2011. | $ | (2,169) | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (2,169) |
|
(11) Fair Value Measurements
FASB ASC 820 sets forth a framework for measuring fair value and required disclosures about fair value measurements of assets and liabilities. Fair value under FASB ASC 820 is defined as the price at which an asset could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, willing parties. A liability's fair value is defined as the amount that would be paid to transfer the liability to a new obligor, not the amount that would be paid to settle the liability with the creditor. Where available, fair value is based on observable market prices or parameters or derived from such prices or parameters. Where observable prices or inputs are not available, use of unobservable prices or inputs are used to estimate the current fair value, often using an internal valuation model. These valuation techniques involve some level of management estimation and judgment, the degree of which is dependent on the item being valued.
FASB ASC 820 established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Partnership's derivative contracts primarily consist of commodity swap contracts which are not traded on a public exchange. The fair values of commodity swap contracts are determined using discounted cash flow techniques. The techniques incorporate Level 1 and Level 2 inputs for future commodity prices that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. These market inputs are utilized in the discounted cash flow calculation considering the instrument's term, notional amount, discount rate and credit risk and are classified as Level 2 in hierarchy.
Net assets (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Level 2 | Level 2 | |||||||
Interest Rate Swaps | $ | - | $ | - | ||||
Commodity Swaps* | (2,720) | (2,444) | ||||||
Total | $ | (2,720) | $ | (2,444) | ||||
* | Unrealized gains or losses on commodity derivatives qualifying for hedge accounting are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income at each measurement date. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The estimated fair value of the Partnership's financial instruments has been determined by the Partnership using available market information and valuation methodologies. Considerable judgment is required to develop the estimates of fair value, thus, the estimates provided below are not necessarily indicative of the amount the Partnership could realize upon the sale or refinancing of such financial instruments (in thousands).
December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | ||||||||||
Value | Value | Value | Value | ||||||||||
Long-term debt | $ | 798,409 | $ | 882,500 | $ | 718,570 | $ | 768,308 | |||||
Obligations under capital lease | 28,367 | 27,637 | 31,327 | 28,807 |
The carrying amounts of the Partnership's cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and accounts payable approximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these assets and liabilities.
The Partnership had $85.0 million in borrowings under its revolving credit facility included in long-term debt as of December 31, 2011 and no borrowings under this credit facility as of December 31, 2010. Borrowings under the credit facility accrue interest under a floating interest rate structure so the carrying value of such indebtedness approximates fair value for the amounts outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Partnership also had borrowings totaling $713.4 million and $711.5 million, net of discount, respectively, under senior unsecured notes with a fixed rate of 8.875% and a series B secured note with a principal amount of $7.1 million as of December 31, 2010 with a fixed rate of 9.5%. The fair value of the senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was based on third party market quotations. The fair values of the series B secured note as of December 31, 2010 was adjusted to reflect current market interest rates for such borrowings on that date.
|
(12) Transactions with Related Parties
CEI paid the Partnership $0.8 million, $0.8 million and $0.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, to cover its portion of administrative and compensation costs for officers and employees that perform services for CEI. This reimbursement is evaluated on an annual basis. Officers and employees that perform services for CEI provide an estimate of the portion of their time devoted to such services. A portion of their annual compensation (including bonuses, payroll taxes and other benefit costs) is allocated to CEI for reimbursement based on these estimates. In addition, an administrative burden is added to such costs to reimburse us for additional support costs, including, but not limited to, consideration for rent, office support and information service support.
|
(13) Commitments and Contingencies
(a) Leases – Lessee
The Partnership has operating leases for office space, office and field equipment.
The following table summarizes the Partnership remaining non-cancelable future payments under operating leases with initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year (in thousands):
2012 | $ | 13,191 | |
2013 | 7,649 | ||
2014 | 5,941 | ||
2015 | 4,535 | ||
2016 | 4,469 | ||
Thereafter | 5,528 | ||
$ | 41,313 | ||
Operating lease rental expense in the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was approximately $21.9 million, $21.9 million and $30.7 million, respectively. |
(b) Employment and Severance Agreements
Certain members of management of the Partnership are parties to employment and/or severance agreements with the general partner. The employment and severance agreements provide those managers with severance payments in certain circumstances and, in the case of employment agreements, prohibit each such person from competing with the general partner or its affiliates for a certain period of time following the termination of such person's employment.
(c) Environmental Issues
The Partnership acquired LIG Pipeline Company and its subsidiaries on April 1, 2004. Contamination from historical operations was identified during due diligence at a number of sites owned by the acquired companies. The seller, AEP, has indemnified the Partnership for these identified sites. Moreover, AEP has entered into an agreement with a third-party company pursuant to which the remediation costs associated with these sites have been assumed by this third party company that specializes in remediation work. The Partnership does not expect to incur any material liability with these sites; however, there can be no assurance that the third parties who have assumed responsibility for remediation of site conditions will fulfill their obligations.
(d) Other
The Partnership is involved in various litigation and administrative proceedings arising in the normal course of business. In the opinion of management, any liabilities that may result from these claims would not individually or in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on its financial position or results of operations.
On June 7, 2010, Formosa Plastics Corporation, Texas, Formosa Plastics Corporation America, Formosa Utility Venture, Ltd., and Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, America filed a lawsuit against Crosstex Energy, Inc., Crosstex Energy, L.P., Crosstex Energy GP, L.P., Crosstex Energy GP, LLC, Crosstex Energy Services, L.P., and Crosstex Gulf Coast Marketing, Ltd. in the 24th Judicial District Court of Calhoun County, Texas, asserting claims for negligence, res ipsa loquitor, products liability and strict liability relating to the alleged receipt by the plaintiffs of natural gas liquids into their facilities from facilities operated by the Partnership. The amended petition alleges that the plaintiffs have incurred approximately $35.0 million in damages, including damage to equipment and lost profits. The Partnership has submitted the claim to its insurance carriers and intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit. The Partnership believes that any recovery would be within applicable policy limits. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter, the Partnership does not expect that an award in this matter will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
At times, the Partnership's gas-utility subsidiaries acquire pipeline easements and other property rights by exercising rights of eminent domain provided under state law. As a result, the Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is a party to a number of lawsuits under which a court will determine the value of pipeline easements or other property interests obtained by the Partnership's gas utility subsidiaries by condemnation. Damage awards in these suits should reflect the value of the property interest acquired and the diminution in the value of the remaining property owned by the landowner. However, some landowners have alleged unique damage theories to inflate their damage claims or assert valuation methodologies that could result in damage awards in excess of the amounts anticipated. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters, the Partnership does not expect that awards in these matters will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
The Partnership (or its subsidiaries) is defending a number of lawsuits filed by owners of property located near processing facilities or compression facilities constructed by the Partnership as part of its systems. The suits generally allege that the facilities create a private nuisance and have damaged the value of surrounding property. Claims of this nature have arisen as a result of the industrial development of natural gas gathering, processing and treating facilities in urban and occupied rural areas. In January 2012, a plaintiff in one of these lawsuits was awarded a judgment of $2.0 million. The Partnership intends to appeal the matter and will post a bond to secure the judgment pending its resolution. The Partnership has accrued $2.0 million related to this matter as of December 31, 2011 and reflected the related expense in operating expenses in the fourth quarter of 2011. Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes of these matters, the Partnership does not expect that awards in these matters will have a material adverse impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.
|
(14) Segment Information
Identification of operating segments is based principally upon regions served. The Partnership's reportable segments consist of the natural gas gathering, processing and transmission operations located in north Texas and in the Permian Basin in west Texas (NTX), the pipelines and processing plants located in Louisiana (LIG) and the south Louisiana processing and NGL assets (PNGL). Segment data for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 do not include assets held for sale. The Partnership's sales are derived from external domestic customers.
The Partnership evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating revenues and segment profits. Corporate expenses include general partnership expenses associated with managing all reportable operating segments. Corporate assets consist principally of property and equipment, including software, for general corporate support, working capital, debt financing costs and its investment in HEP. Profit in the corporate segment for the years ended 2010 and 2009 includes the operating activity of assets sold but not considered discontinued operations as well as intersegment eliminations.
Summarized financial information concerning the Partnership's reportable segments is shown in the following table.
LIG | NTX | PNGL | Corporate | Totals | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2011: | |||||||||||||||||
Sales to external customers | $ | 811,216 | $ | 332,026 | $ | 870,700 | $ | - | $ | 2,013,942 | |||||||
Sales to affiliates | 128,130 | 100,527 | 40,185 | (268,842) | - | ||||||||||||
Purchased gas and NGLs | (809,471) | (262,708) | (835,440) | 268,842 | (1,638,777) | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | (35,434) | (48,807) | (27,537) | - | (111,778) | ||||||||||||
Segment profit | $ | 94,441 | $ | 121,038 | $ | 47,908 | $ | - | $ | 263,387 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on derivatives | $ | (6,145) | $ | (1,896) | $ | 265 | $ | - | $ | (7,776) | |||||||
Depreciation, amortization | |||||||||||||||||
and impairments | $ | (13,602) | $ | (76,535) | $ | (31,271) | $ | (3,876) | $ | (125,284) | |||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 2,820 | $ | 73,069 | $ | 25,618 | $ | 2,629 | $ | 104,136 | |||||||
Identifiable assets | $ | 304,372 | $ | 1,113,431 | $ | 460,865 | $ | 76,663 | $ | 1,955,331 | |||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2010: | |||||||||||||||||
Sales to external customers | $ | 880,336 | $ | 309,771 | $ | 602,569 | $ | - | $ | 1,792,676 | |||||||
Sales to affiliates | 82,688 | 89,752 | - | (172,440) | - | ||||||||||||
Purchased gas and NGLs | (845,627) | (240,085) | (541,104) | 172,440 | (1,454,376) | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | (33,188) | (46,384) | (25,488) | - | (105,060) | ||||||||||||
Segment profit | $ | 84,209 | $ | 113,054 | $ | 35,977 | $ | - | $ | 233,240 | |||||||
Loss on derivatives | $ | (3,664) | $ | (5,352) | $ | (84) | $ | - | $ | (9,100) | |||||||
Depreciation, amortization and | |||||||||||||||||
impairments | $ | (12,308) | $ | (64,458) | $ | (31,661) | $ | (4,435) | $ | (112,862) | |||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 9,930 | $ | 31,678 | $ | 5,871 | $ | 1,907 | $ | 49,386 | |||||||
Identifiable assets | $ | 330,199 | $ | 1,107,279 | $ | 493,143 | $ | 54,319 | $ | 1,984,940 | |||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||
Sales to external customers | $ | 830,248 | $ | 439,265 | $ | 297,872 | $ | 16,166 | $ | 1,583,551 | |||||||
Sales to affiliates | 63,581 | 70,141 | - | (133,722) | - | ||||||||||||
Purchased gas and NGLs | (792,991) | (352,762) | (250,060) | 123,484 | (1,272,329) | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses | (27,550) | (49,379) | (30,991) | (2,474) | (110,394) | ||||||||||||
Segment profit | $ | 73,288 | $ | 107,265 | $ | 16,821 | $ | 3,454 | $ | 200,828 | |||||||
Gain (loss) on derivatives | $ | (467) | $ | 2,289 | $ | 1,172 | $ | - | $ | 2,994 | |||||||
Depreciation, amortization | |||||||||||||||||
and impairments | $ | (12,996) | $ | (65,956) | $ | (35,284) | $ | (7,746) | $ | (121,982) | |||||||
Capital expenditures | $ | 30,992 | $ | 43,289 | $ | 7,973 | $ | 1,153 | $ | 83,407 | |||||||
Identifiable assets | $ | 341,495 | $ | 1,168,182 | $ | 505,155 | $ | 54,349 | $ | 2,069,181 |
The following table reconciles the segment profits reported above to the operating income as reported in the consolidated | ||||||||||||
statements of operations (in thousands): | ||||||||||||
Years ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Segment profits | $ | 263,387 | $ | 233,240 | $ | 200,828 | ||||||
General and administrative expenses | (52,801) | (48,414) | (59,854) | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on derivatives | (7,776) | (9,100) | 2,994 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of property | (264) | 13,881 | 666 | |||||||||
Depreciation, amortization and impairments | (125,284) | (112,862) | (121,982) | |||||||||
Operating income | $ | 77,262 | $ | 76,745 | $ | 22,652 |
|
(15) Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Summarized unaudited quarterly financial data is presented below.
First | Second | Third | Fourth | Total | ||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per unit data) | ||||||||||||||||
2011: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues (1) | $ | 489,770 | $ | 525,735 | $ | 517,498 | $ | 480,939 | $ | 2,013,942 | ||||||
Operating income | $ | 19,983 | $ | 22,890 | $ | 16,249 | $ | 18,140 | $ | 77,262 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the | ||||||||||||||||
non-controlling interest | $ | (54) | $ | (52) | $ | (23) | $ | 81 | $ | (48) | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the | ||||||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. | $ | 128 | $ | 1,667 | $ | (2,736) | $ | (1,401) | $ | (2,342) | ||||||
Preferred interest in net income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||
attributable to Crosstex | ||||||||||||||||
Energy, L.P. | $ | 4,265 | $ | 4,559 | $ | 4,558 | $ | 4,706 | $ | 18,088 | ||||||
Beneficial conversion feature | ||||||||||||||||
General partner interest in net | ||||||||||||||||
income (loss) | $ | (522) | $ | (111) | $ | (76) | $ | (23) | $ | (732) | ||||||
Limited partners' interest in net income | ||||||||||||||||
(loss) attributable to | ||||||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. | $ | (3,615) | $ | (2,781) | $ | (7,218) | $ | (6,084) | $ | (19,698) | ||||||
Loss per limited partner | ||||||||||||||||
unit-basic | $ | (0.07) | $ | (0.05) | $ | (0.14) | $ | (0.12) | $ | (0.38) | ||||||
Loss per limited partner | ||||||||||||||||
unit-diluted | $ | (0.07) | $ | (0.05) | $ | (0.14) | $ | (0.12) | $ | (0.38) | ||||||
Basic and diluted senior | ||||||||||||||||
2010: | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 468,658 | $ | 442,048 | $ | 454,735 | $ | 427,235 | $ | 1,792,676 | ||||||
Operating income | $ | 24,598 | $ | 17,591 | $ | 16,731 | $ | 17,825 | $ | 76,745 | ||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to the | ||||||||||||||||
non-controlling interest | $ | (35) | $ | 10 | $ | 13 | $ | 31 | $ | 19 | ||||||
Net loss attributable to the | ||||||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. | $ | (17,328) | $ | (2,468) | $ | (3,668) | $ | (2,384) | $ | (25,848) | ||||||
Preferred interest in net loss | ||||||||||||||||
attributable to Crosstex | ||||||||||||||||
Energy, L.P. | $ | 3,125 | $ | 3,125 | $ | 3,676 | $ | 3,824 | $ | 13,750 | ||||||
Beneficial conversion feature | ||||||||||||||||
attributable to preferred units | $ | 22,279 | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | 22,279 | ||||||
General partner interest in net | ||||||||||||||||
loss | $ | (1,496) | $ | (1,279) | $ | (820) | $ | (776) | $ | (4,371) | ||||||
Limited partners' interest in net | ||||||||||||||||
loss attributable to | ||||||||||||||||
Crosstex Energy, L.P. | $ | (41,236) | $ | (4,314) | $ | (6,524) | $ | (5,432) | $ | (57,506) | ||||||
Loss per limited partner | ||||||||||||||||
unit-basic | $ | (0.81) | $ | (0.08) | $ | (0.13) | $ | (0.11) | $ | (1.12) | ||||||
Loss per limited partner | ||||||||||||||||
unit-diluted | $ | (0.81) | $ | (0.08) | $ | (0.13) | $ | (0.11) | $ | (1.12) |