Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549

 
Form 10-Q

(Mark One)
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2016
or
☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from               to               
Commission File Number: 001-31240

  
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 
 	 	 	
Delaware	 	84-1611629	
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)	 	(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)	
 
6363 South Fiddler’s Green Circle	 	 	
Greenwood Village, Colorado	 	80111	
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	 	(Zip Code)	
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (303) 863-7414

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     ☒   Yes     ☐   No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).     ☒   Yes     ☐   No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act.

 	Large accelerated filer	  ☒	 	Accelerated filer	☐	
 	Non-accelerated filer	  ☐	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company.)	Smaller reporting company	☐	
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act).     ☐   Yes     ☒   No
 
There were 530,530,905 shares of common stock outstanding on April 13, 2016.

 

 
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

 	 	 	 	Page	
 	 	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION	 	 	
ITEM 1.  	 	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	 	1	
 	 	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	 	1	
 	 	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	 	2	
 	 	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	 	3	
 	 	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	 	4	
 	 	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	 	5	
ITEM 2.  	 	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  	 	44	
 	 	Overview	 	44	
 	 	Selected Financial and Operating Results	 	46	
 	 	Consolidated Financial Results	 	46	
 	 	Results of Consolidated Operations	 	51	
 	 	Liquidity and Capital Resources	 	56	
 	 	Environmental	 	58	
 	 	Accounting Developments	 	59	
 	 	Non-GAAP Financial Measures	 	59	
 	 	Safe Harbor Statement	 	66	
ITEM 3.  	 	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	 	68	
ITEM 4.  	 	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	 	70	
 	 	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION	 	 	
ITEM 1.  	 	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	 	71	
ITEM 1A.  	 	RISK FACTORS	 	71	
ITEM 2.  	 	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS  	 	71	
ITEM 3.  	 	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	 	71	
ITEM 4.  	 	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	 	71	
ITEM 5.  	 	OTHER INFORMATION	 	72	
ITEM 6.  	 	EXHIBITS	 	72	
SIGNATURES  	 	73	
EXHIBIT INDEX  	 	74	

 

 

Table of Contents
PART I  —FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
 
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF  INCOME
(unaudited, in millions except per share)

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	  	
Sales	 	$	
2,032	 	$	
1,972	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs and expenses	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (1)  	 	 	
1,081	 	 	
1,027	 	
Depreciation and amortization	 	 	
322	 	 	
289	 	
Reclamation and remediation (Note 5)	 	 	
25	 	 	
23	 	
Exploration 	 	 	
30	 	 	
33	 	
Advanced projects, research and development	 	 	
28	 	 	
28	 	
General and administrative 	 	 	
57	 	 	
58	 	
Other expense, net	 	 	
18	 	 	
17	 	
 	 	 	
1,561	 	 	
1,475	 	
Other income (expense)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other income, net	 	 	
98	 	 	
11	 	
Interest expense, net	 	 	
(79)	 	 	
(85)	 	
 	 	 	
19	 	 	
(74)	 	
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items	 	 	
490	 	 	
423	 	
Income and mining tax benefit (expense) (Note 6)	 	 	
(324)	 	 	
(193)	 	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	 	 	
(5)	 	 	
(9)	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations 	 	 	
161	 	 	
221	 	
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	 	 	
(26)	 	 	
8	 	
Net income (loss)	 	 	
135	 	 	
229	 	
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests (Note 7)	 	 	
(83)	 	 	
(46)	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders 	 	$	
52	 	$	
183	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations 	 	$	
78	 	$	
175	 	
Discontinued operations 	 	 	
(26)	 	 	
8	 	
 	 	$	
52	 	$	
183	 	
Income (loss) per common share (Note 8)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations 	 	$	
0.15	 	$	
0.35	 	
Discontinued operations 	 	 	
(0.05)	 	 	
0.02	 	
 	 	$	
0.10	 	$	
0.37	 	
Diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations 	 	$	
0.15	 	$	
0.35	 	
Discontinued operations 	 	 	
(0.05)	 	 	
0.02	 	
 	 	$	
0.10	 	$	
0.37	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash dividends declared per common share 	 	$	
0.025	 	$	
0.025	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.  	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
(unaudited, in millions)

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	
Net income (loss)	 	$	
135	 	$	
229	 	
Other comprehensive income (loss):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in marketable securities, net of $nil and $nil tax benefit (expense), respectively	 	 	
(77)	 	 	
1	 	
Foreign currency translation adjustments 	 	 	
3	 	 	
(10)	 	
Change in pension and other post-retirement benefits, net of $(2) and $(2), tax benefit (expense), respectively	 	 	
3	 	 	
5	 	
Change in fair value of cash flow hedge instruments, net of $(8) and $4, tax benefit (expense), respectively	 	 	
19	 	 	
(10)	 	
Other comprehensive income (loss)	 	 	
(52)	 	 	
(14)	 	
Comprehensive income (loss)	 	$	
83	 	$	
215	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Newmont stockholders 	 	$	 —	 	$	
169	 	
Noncontrolling interests	 	 	
83	 	 	
46	 	
 	 	$	
83	 	$	
215	 	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS   
(unaudited, in millions)

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Operating activities:	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Net income (loss)	    	$	
135	  	$	
229	 	
Adjustments:	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Depreciation and amortization	 	 	
322	  	 	
289	 	
Stock-based compensation	 	 	
16	 	 	
20	 	
Reclamation and remediation	 	 	
24	 	 	
23	 	
Loss (income) from discontinued operations	 	 	
26	 	 	
(8)	 	
Impairment of investments	 	 	 —	 	 	
57	 	
Deferred income taxes 	 	 	
153	  	 	
61	 	
Gain on asset and investment sales, net	 	 	
(104)	 	 	
(44)	 	
Other operating adjustments and impairments	 	 	
92	 	 	
74	 	
Net change in operating assets and liabilities (Note 20)	 	 	
(140)	  	 	
(73)	 	
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities	 	 	
524	  	 	
628	 	
Net cash used in discontinued operations	 	 	
(2)	  	 	
(3)	 	
Net cash provided by operating activities	 	 	
522	  	 	
625	 	
Investing activities:	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Additions to property, plant and mine development 	 	 	
(297)	  	 	
(284)	 	
Sales of investments	 	 	
184	 	 	
29	 	
Proceeds from sale of other assets	 	 	
6	 	 	
44	 	
Other 	 	 	
(4)	  	 	
(3)	 	
Net cash used in investing activities 	 	 	
(111)	  	 	
(214)	 	
Financing activities:	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Repayment of debt 	 	 	
(499)	  	 	
(205)	 	
Sale of noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	
37	 	
Funding from noncontrolling interests	 	 	
12	 	 	
47	 	
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests 	 	 	
(146)	  	 	
(3)	 	
Dividends paid to common stockholders 	 	 	
(13)	  	 	
(12)	 	
Increase in restricted cash, net	 	 	
(91)	  	 	
(55)	 	
Other	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
(5)	 	
Net cash used in financing activities	 	 	
(738)	 	 	
(196)	 	
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 	 	 	
6	  	 	
(20)	 	
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 	 	 	
(321)	  	 	
195	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 	 	 	
2,782	  	 	
2,403	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 	 	$	
2,461	  	$	
2,598	 	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS   
(unaudited, in millions)

 	 	   At March 31,    	 	At December 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
ASSETS	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	 	$	
2,461	 	$	
2,782	 	
Trade receivables	 	 	
273	 	 	
260	 	
Other accounts receivables	 	 	
222	 	 	
185	 	
Investments (Note 13)	 	 	
27	 	 	
19	 	
Inventories (Note 14)	 	 	
710	 	 	
710	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads (Note 15)	 	 	
864	 	 	
896	 	
Other current assets	 	 	
223	 	 	
131	 	
Current assets	 	 	
4,780	 	 	
4,983	 	
Property, plant and mine development, net	 	 	
14,284	 	 	
14,303	 	
Investments (Note 13)	 	 	
240	 	 	
402	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads (Note 15)	 	 	
3,021	 	 	
3,000	 	
Deferred income tax assets	 	 	
1,533	 	 	
1,718	 	
Other non-current assets	 	 	
695	 	 	
730	 	
Total assets	 	$	
24,553	 	$	
25,136	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
LIABILITIES	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt (Note 16)	 	$	
335	 	$	
149	 	
Accounts payable	 	 	
367	 	 	
396	 	
Employee-related benefits	 	 	
196	 	 	
293	 	
Income and mining taxes payable	 	 	
75	 	 	
38	 	
Other current liabilities (Note 17)	 	 	
485	 	 	
540	 	
Current liabilities	 	 	
1,458	 	 	
1,416	 	
Debt (Note 16)	 	 	
5,369	 	 	
6,041	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities (Note 5)	 	 	
1,821	 	 	
1,800	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities	 	 	
865	 	 	
840	 	
Employee-related benefits	 	 	
454	 	 	
437	 	
Other non-current liabilities (Note 17)	 	 	
333	 	 	
310	 	
Total liabilities	 	 	
10,300	 	 	
10,844	 	

EQUITY	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common stock	 	 	
849	 	 	
847	 	
Additional paid-in capital	 	 	
9,437	 	 	
9,427	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 19)	 	 	
(386)	 	 	
(334)	 	
Retained earnings	 	 	
1,449	 	 	
1,410	 	
Newmont stockholders' equity	 	 	
11,349	 	 	
11,350	 	
Noncontrolling interests	 	 	
2,904	 	 	
2,942	 	
Total equity (Note 18)	 	 	
14,253	 	 	
14,292	 	
Total liabilities and equity	 	$	
24,553	 	$	
25,136	 	
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NOTE 1     BASIS OF PRESENTATIO  N
 
The interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (“interim statements”) of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont” or the “Company”) are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (including normal recurring adjustments) and disclosures necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included. The results reported in these interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year. These interim statements should be read in conjunction with Newmont’s Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed on February 17, 2016 on Form 10-K. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements and, in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q, certain information and footnote disclosures required by United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted. References to “A$” refers to Australian currency and “C$” refers to Canadian currency.
 
The Company has reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the 2016 presentation including the following items :
 
The Company retrospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2015-03, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented as a deduction from the corresponding debt liability. Refer to Note 2 for further details.
 
The Company reclassified regional administrative costs of $14 from Other expense, net to General and administrative and community development costs of $8 from Other expense, net to Costs applicable to sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.
 
NOTE 2     SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 
Risks and Uncertainties
 
As a global mining company, the Company’s revenue, profitability and future rate of growth are substantially dependent on prevailing prices for gold, copper and, to a lesser extent, silver. Historically, the commodity markets have been very volatile, and there can be no assurance that commodity prices will not be subject to wide fluctuations in the future. A substantial or extended decline in commodity prices could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, cash flows, access to capital and on the quantities of reserves that the Company can economically produce. The carrying value of the Company’s Property, plant and mine development ,   net,   Inventories,   Stockpiles and ore on leach pads and Deferred income tax assets are sensitive to the outlook for commodity prices. A decline in the Company’s long term price outlook from current levels could result in material impairment charges related to these assets.
 
In September 2014, PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara (“PTNNT”) and the Government of Indonesia signed a Memorandum of Understanding (“MoU”) that resulted in the government agreeing to issue permits to allow PTNNT to export and sell copper concentrates from the Batu Hijau mine (“Batu Hijau”). The government then issued several six month export permits commencing in September 2014, March 2015 and November 2015. The most recent November permit was issued following a two month delay and expires in May 2016. Effective with the signing of the MoU, PTNNT agreed to pay certain export duties and royalties. The MoU also outlines terms for the six main elements of the Contract of Work (the investment agreement entered into by PTNNT and the Indonesian government in 1986, which includes the right to export copper concentrates and a prohibition against new taxes, duties, and levies) renegotiation, which will be incorporated into an amendment of the Contract of Work. The six areas are: 1) concession area size; 2) royalties, taxes and export duties; 3) domestic processing and refining; 4) ownership divestment; 5) utilization of local manpower, domestic goods and services; and 6) duration of the Contract of Work. Negotiations between PTNNT and the Government of Indonesia to amend the Contract of Work remain on-going. No assurances can be made at this time with

5

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
respect to the outcome of such negotiations and the renewal of the export permit. The failure to receive a timely renewal may negatively impact future operations and financial results at Batu Hijau. As a result of the on-going Contract of Work renegotiations at Batu Hijau, the need for asset impairments, inventory write-downs, tax valuation allowances and other applicable accounting charges will continue to be evaluated. At this time, the Company expects operations to continue into the future. The total assets at Batu Hijau as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $3,726 and $3,483, respectively.
 
During the last several years, Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (“Yanacocha”), in which the Company owns a 51.35% interest, and whose properties include the mining operations at Yanacocha and the Conga Project in Peru, has been the target of local political and community protests, some of which blocked the road between the Yanacocha mine and Conga Project complexes and the City of Cajamarca in Peru and resulted in vandalism and equipment damage. The Company cannot predict whether similar or more significant incidents will occur in the future. The recurrence of significant political or community opposition or protests could continue to adversely affect Conga’s development and the continued operation of Yanacocha. Construction activities on the Conga Project were suspended on November 30, 2011 at the request of Peru’s central government following increasing protests in Cajamarca by anti-mining activists led by the regional president. In the first half of 2014, a Conga Restart Study was completed to identify and test alternatives to advancing development of the project. Following this assessment, a new plan was developed to reduce spending to focus on only the most critical work – protecting people and assets, engaging with communities, and maintaining existing project infrastructure – while maintaining optionality. Newmont will not proceed with the full development of Conga without social acceptance, solid project economics and potentially another partner to help defray costs and risk; it is currently difficult to predict when or whether such events may occur. Under the current social and political environment, the Company does not anticipate being able to develop Conga for the foreseeable future. Should the Company be unable to develop Conga, the Company may in the future reprioritize and reallocate capital to development alternatives which may result in an impairment of the Conga Project. The total assets at Conga as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $1,674 and $1,678, respectively.
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the accounting for and recognition and disclosure of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses. The Company must make these estimates and assumptions because certain information used is dependent on future events, cannot be calculated with a high degree of precision from data available or simply cannot be readily calculated based on generally accepted methodologies. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
 
Employee benefit plan accounting
 
In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued ASU No. 2015-12 related to defined benefit pension plans, defined contribution pension plans, and health and welfare benefit plans. This update designates contract value as the only required measure for fully benefit-responsive investment contracts, simplifies and makes more effective the investment disclosure requirements for employee benefit plans, and provides a simplified method for determining the measurement date for employee benefit plans. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2016 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.
 
Fair value measurement
 
In May 2015, ASU No. 2015-07 was issued related to investments for which fair value is measured, or are eligible to be measured, using the net asset value per share practical expedient. This update removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per

6

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
share practical expedient. The amendment also removes certain disclosure requirements for these investments. This update will impact the annual disclosure related to pension plan assets measured at fair value. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Adoption of this guidance effective January 1, 2016 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Debt issuance costs
 
In April 2015, ASU No. 2015-03 was issued related to debt issuance costs. This update simplifies the presentation of debt issuance costs by requiring debt issuance costs to be presented as a deduction from the corresponding debt liability. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company retrospectively adopted this guidance as of March 31, 2016. The Company reclassified $46 of debt issuance costs from Other non-current assets to Debt as of December 31, 2015. The December 31, 2015, balance sheet was adjusted as a result of the adoption of ASU 2015-03 as follows:

 	 	At December 31, 2015	 	
 	    	As Reported	    	As Adjusted	    	
Other non-current assets	 	$	
776	 	$	
730	 	
Debt (non-current)	 	$	
6,087	 	$	
6,041	 	
 
ASU No. 2015-03 does not specifically address the accounting for deferred financing costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. In August 2015, ASU No. 2015-15 was issued allowing for debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements to continue to be presented as assets. The Company will treat all debt issuance costs as a reduction to the carrying value of debt.
 
Consolidations
 
In February 2015, ASU No. 2015-02 was issued related to consolidations. This update makes some targeted changes to current consolidation guidance and impacts both the voting and the variable interest consolidation models. In particular, the update changes how companies determine whether limited partnerships or similar entities are variable interest entities. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company currently consolidates certain variable interest entities and a doption of this guidance effective January 1, 2016 had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
 
Stock-based compensation
 
In March 2016, ASU No. 2016-09 was issued related to stock-based compensation. The new guidance simplifies the accounting for stock-based compensation transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
 
Leases
 
In February 2016, ASU No. 2016-02 was issued related to leases. The new guidance modifies the classification criteria and requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities arising from most leases on the balance sheet. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is

7

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
 
Investments
 
In January 2016, ASU No. 2016-01 was issued related to financial instruments. The new guidance requires entities to measure equity investments that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income. This new guidance also updates certain disclosure requirements for these investments. This update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
 
Inventory
 
In July 2015, ASU No. 2015-11 was issued related to inventory, simplifying the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test. The update is effective in fiscal years, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the updated guidance to have an impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements or disclosures.
 
Revenue recognition
 
In May 2014, and further amended in August 2015, March 2016 and April 2016, ASUs No. 2014-09, No. 2015-14, No. 2016-08, and No. 2016-10 were issued related to revenue from contracts with customers. The new standard provides a five-step approach to be applied to all contracts with customers and also requires expanded disclosures about revenue recognition. In August 2015, the effective date was deferred to reporting periods, including interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2017, and will be applied retrospectively. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.
 
NOTE 3    BUSINESS ACQUISITION
 
On June 8, 2015, the Company announced an agreement with AngloGold Ashanti Limited to acquire 100% ownership in the Cripple Creek & Victor (“CC&V”) gold mining business in Colorado. CC&V is a surface mine with heap leach operations that provides ore to a crusher and a leach facility. During 2015, the Company received $675 in net proceeds from a common stock issuance. Newmont used the proceeds, supplemented with cash from the Company’s balance sheet, to fund the acquisition. On August 3, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of CC&V for $821, plus a 2.5% net smelter return royalty on future gold production from underground ore which had no fair value at the acquisition date. The acquisition is not material to the Company's results of operations, individually or in the aggregate; as a result, no pro forma financial information is provided.
 
The final valuation of acquired assets and liabilities assumed is not complete. The principal remaining items to be valued are stockpile and leach pad inventory values, which will be finalized as management monitors actual versus forecasted leach pad and mill performance for both recoveries and costs. The Company expects these final valuations and assessments to be completed in the first half of 2016. For further discussion of the CC&V acquisition, refer to Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 on Form 10-K.

8

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NOTE 4     SEGMENT INFORMATION
 
The Company has organized its operations into four geographic regions. The geographic regions include North America, South America, Asia Pacific and Africa and represent the Company’s operating segments. The operating results of these operating segments are reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segments and assess their performance. As a result, these operating segments represent the Company’s reportable segments. Notwithstanding this structure, the Company internally reports information on a mine-by-mine basis for each mining operation and have chosen to disclose this information on the following tables. Pre-Tax Income (Loss) from reportable segments does not reflect general corporate expenses, interest (except project-specific interest) or income and mining taxes (except for equity investments). Intercompany revenue and expense amounts have been eliminated within each segment in order to report on the basis that management uses internally for evaluating segment performance. Newmont’s business activities that are not considered operating segments are included in Corporate and Other although they are not required to be included in this footnote; they are provided for reconciliation purposes. In the first quarter of 2016, the Merian project moved from Corporate and Other to the South America reportable segment as a result of the mine being included in the operating results and resource allocation of the South America segment. Segment results for prior periods have been retrospectively revised to reflect this change. The financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows:

9

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	Advanced	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	Costs	 	Depreciation	 	Projects, Research	 	Pre ‑ Tax	  	 	  	
 	 	 	 	 	Applicable	 	and	 	and Development 	 	Income	 	Capital	 	
 	    	Sales	    	to   Sales	    	Amortization	    	and Exploration	    	(Loss)	    	Expenditures (1)	 	
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
246	 	$	
189	 	$	
49	 	$	
3	 	$	
2	 	$	
36	 	
Phoenix:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	 	
64	 	 	
49	 	 	
15	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	
21	 	 	
22	 	 	
5	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Phoenix	 	 	
85	 	 	
71	 	 	
20	 	 	 —	 	 	
(11)	 	 	
4	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
159	 	 	
60	 	 	
13	 	 	
2	 	 	
83	 	 	
6	 	
CC&V (2)	 	 	
65	 	 	
33	 	 	
18	 	 	
3	 	 	
10	 	 	
21	 	
Other North America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
7	 	 	
(9)	 	 	
36	 	
North America	 	 	
555	 	 	
353	 	 	
100	 	 	
15	 	 	
75	 	 	
103	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Yanacocha	 	 	
211	 	 	
128	 	 	
69	 	 	
9	 	 	
(11)	 	 	
14	 	
Merian	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
3	 	 	
(4)	 	 	
82	 	
Other South America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
6	 	 	
(11)	 	 	 —	 	
South America	 	 	
211	 	 	
128	 	 	
73	 	 	
18	 	 	
(26)	 	 	
96	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	 	
204	 	 	
111	 	 	
23	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	
30	 	 	
23	 	 	
5	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Boddington	 	 	
234	 	 	
134	 	 	
28	 	 	 —	 	 	
64	 	 	
11	 	
Tanami	 	 	
120	 	 	
59	 	 	
19	 	 	
3	 	 	
38	 	 	
24	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
106	 	 	
65	 	 	
5	 	 	
1	 	 	
33	 	 	
3	 	
Batu Hijau:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	 	
283	 	 	
100	 	 	
20	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	
287	 	 	
130	 	 	
26	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Batu Hijau	 	 	
570	 	 	
230	 	 	
46	 	 	
1	 	 	
282	 	 	
10	 	
Other Asia Pacific	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
4	 	 	
1	 	 	
(5)	 	 	 —	 	
Asia Pacific	 	 	
1,030	 	 	
488	 	 	
102	 	 	
6	 	 	
412	 	 	
48	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ahafo	 	 	
101	 	 	
57	 	 	
15	 	 	
5	 	 	
20	 	 	
17	 	
Akyem	 	 	
135	 	 	
55	 	 	
29	 	 	
1	 	 	
47	 	 	
7	 	
Other Africa	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
(2)	 	 	 —	 	
Africa	 	 	
236	 	 	
112	 	 	
44	 	 	
7	 	 	
65	 	 	
24	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Corporate and Other	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
12	 	 	
(36)	 	 	
2	 	
Consolidated	 	$	
2,032	 	$	
1,081	 	$	
322	 	$	
58	 	$	
490	 	$	
273	 	

	(1)		Includes a decrease in accrued capital expenditures of $24; consolidated capital expenditures on a cash basis were $297.	
	(2)		On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired the CC&V gold mining business.	

10

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	Advanced	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	Costs	 	Depreciation	 	Projects, Research	 	Pre ‑ Tax	  	 	  	
 	 	 	 	 	Applicable	 	and	 	and Development 	 	Income	 	Capital	 	
 	    	Sales	    	to   Sales	    	Amortization	    	and Exploration	    	(Loss)	    	Expenditures (1)	 	
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
276	 	$	
178	 	$	
45	 	$	
3	 	$	
47	 	$	
57	 	
Phoenix:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	 	
61	 	 	
41	 	 	
10	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	
34	 	 	
25	 	 	
6	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Phoenix	 	 	
95	 	 	
66	 	 	
16	 	 	
1	 	 	
8	 	 	
7	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
149	 	 	
59	 	 	
13	 	 	
2	 	 	
74	 	 	
19	 	
Other North America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
5	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
6	 	
North America	 	 	
520	 	 	
303	 	 	
74	 	 	
11	 	 	
128	 	 	
89	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Yanacocha	 	 	
301	 	 	
115	 	 	
71	 	 	
5	 	 	
94	 	 	
15	 	
Merian	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	
(2)	 	 	
86	 	
Other South America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
10	 	 	
(13)	 	 	 —	 	
South America	 	 	
301	 	 	
115	 	 	
74	 	 	
17	 	 	
79	 	 	
101	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	 	
239	 	 	
157	 	 	
30	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	
47	 	 	
39	 	 	
7	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Boddington	 	 	
286	 	 	
196	 	 	
37	 	 	
1	 	 	
58	 	 	
11	 	
Tanami	 	 	
120	 	 	
58	 	 	
19	 	 	
1	 	 	
45	 	 	
16	 	
Waihi (2)	 	 	
50	 	 	
19	 	 	
5	 	 	
1	 	 	
25	 	 	
6	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
74	 	 	
60	 	 	
5	 	 	 —	 	 	
11	 	 	
7	 	
Batu Hijau:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	 	
114	 	 	
51	 	 	
9	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	
246	 	 	
123	 	 	
21	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total Batu Hijau	 	 	
360	 	 	
174	 	 	
30	 	 	
1	 	 	
135	 	 	
20	 	
Other Asia Pacific	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
4	 	 	
1	 	 	
(9)	 	 	 —	 	
Asia Pacific	 	 	
890	 	 	
507	 	 	
100	 	 	
5	 	 	
265	 	 	
60	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ahafo	 	 	
121	 	 	
56	 	 	
15	 	 	
6	 	 	
44	 	 	
21	 	
Akyem	 	 	
140	 	 	
46	 	 	
22	 	 	 —	 	 	
71	 	 	
11	 	
Other Africa	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
(3)	 	 	 —	 	
Africa	 	 	
261	 	 	
102	 	 	
37	 	 	
7	 	 	
112	 	 	
32	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Corporate and Other	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
4	 	 	
21	 	 	
(161)	 	 	
6	 	
Consolidated	 	$	
1,972	 	$	
1,027	 	$	
289	 	$	
61	 	$	
423	 	$	
288	 	

	(1)		Includes an increase in accrued capital expenditures of $4 consolidated capital expenditures on a cash basis were $284.	
	(2)		On October 29, 2015, the Company sold the Waihi mine .  	

 

11

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NOTE 5     RECLAMATION AND REMEDIATION
 
The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various domestic and international laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations to protect public health and the environment and believes its operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation and remediation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements.
 
The Company’s Reclamation and remediation expense consisted of:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	  	
Reclamation Accretion	 	$	
23	 	$	
21	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Remediation	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	
Remediation Accretion	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	
 	 	 	
2	 	 	
2	 	
 	 	$	
25	 	$	
23	 	
 
The following are reconciliations of Reclamation and remediation   liabilities : 

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Reclamation balance at beginning of period	 	$	
1,553	 	$	
1,497	 	
Additions, changes in estimates and other 	 	 	
2	 	 	
(2)	 	
Payments and other	 	 	
(3)	 	 	
(3)	 	
Accretion expense 	 	 	
23	 	 	
21	 	
Reclamation balance at end of period	 	$	
1,575	 	$	
1,513	 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Remediation balance at beginning of period	 	$	
318	 	$	
192	 	
Additions, changes in estimates and other 	 	 	 —	 	 	
(1)	 	
Payments and other	 	 	
(3)	 	 	
(21)	 	
Accretion expense 	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	
Remediation balance at end of period	 	$	
316	 	$	
171	 	
 
The current portion of reclamation liabilities included in Other current liabilities was $36 and $37 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The current portion of remediation liabilities included in Other current liabilities was $34 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $1,575 and $1,553, respectively, were accrued for reclamation obligations relating to operating properties. In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former, primarily historic, mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $316 and $318, respectively, were accrued for such environmental remediation obligations.

12

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
There was $15 in current restricted cash for settling asset retirement obligations at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, related to the Batu Hijau mine in Asia Pacific. Current restricted cash is included in Other current assets. Non-current restricted cash held for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations was $88 and $65 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Of the amount at March 31, 2016, $43 is related to the Midnite Mine in Washington State, $23 is related to the Batu Hijau mine in Asia Pacific, $13 is related to the Ahafo and Akyem mines in Ghana, Africa and $9 is related to the Con mine in Yellowknife, NWT, Canada. Of the amount at December 31, 2015, $43 is related to the Midnite Mine in Washington State, $13 is related to the Ahafo and Akyem mines in Ghana, Africa and $9 is related to the Con mine in Yellowknife, NWT, Canada.
 
Included in Investments at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, was $19 and $20, respectively, of non-current equity securities, which are legally pledged for purposes of settling reclamation and remediation obligations related to the San Jose Reservoir in Yanacocha and for various locations in Nevada.
 
NOTE 6     INCOME AND MINING TAXES
 
The Company’s income and mining tax expense (benefit) differed from the amounts computed by applying the United States statutory corporate income tax rate for the following reasons:

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	
 	      	2016	      	2015	 	
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items	 	 	 	    	$	
490	 	 	 	    	$	
423	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Tax at statutory rate	 	
35	%	 	$	
172	 	
35	%	 	$	
148	 	
Reconciling items:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Percentage depletion 	 	
(9)	%	 	 	
(42)	 	
(3)	%	 	 	
(15)	 	
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets	 	
39	%	 	 	
194	 	
10	%	 	 	
44	 	
Mining and other taxes	 	
5	%	 	 	
23	 	
2	%	 	 	
8	 	
Tax impact on sale of assets	 	
(7)	%	 	 	
(35)	 	 —	%	 	 	 —	 	
Effect of foreign earnings, net of credits	 	
2	%	 	 	
10	 	
1	%	 	 	
3	 	
Other 	 	
1	%	 	 	
2	 	
1	%	 	 	
5	 	
Income and mining tax benefit (expense)	 	
66	%	 	$	
324	 	
46	%	 	$	
193	 	
 
A valuation allowance is provided for those deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized. In determining the amount of the valuation allowance, each quarter, the Company considers future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimated future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback year(s), as well as feasible tax planning strategies in each jurisdiction to determine if the deferred tax assets are realizable. If it is determined that the Company will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, it will place or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if determined that it will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of risk factors that could impact the Company’s ability to realize the deferred tax assets.
 
The Company operates in numerous countries around the world and accordingly it is subject to, and pays taxes under the various tax regimes in the countries in which it operates. Some of these tax regimes are defined by contractual agreements with the local government, and others are defined by the general corporate income tax laws of the country. The Company has historically filed, and continues to file, all required income tax returns and pay the income taxes determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in many countries are complex and subject to interpretation. From time to time the Company is subject to a review of its historic income tax filings and in connection with such reviews,

13

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain rules to the Company’s business conducted within the country involved.
 
At March 31, 2016, the Company’s total unrecognized tax liability including interest and penalties was $79 for uncertain income tax positions taken or expected to be taken on income tax returns. Of this, $37 represents the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate.
 
As a result of the statute of limitations that expire in the next 12 months in various jurisdictions, and possible settlements of audit-related issues with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions, none of which are individually significant, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the total amount of its net unrecognized income tax benefits will decrease by approximately $55 to $60 in the next 12 months.
 
NOTE 7     NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	 	2016	 	2015	 	
Minera Yanacocha 	    	$	
(11)	    	$	
5	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
95	 	 	
45	 	
TMAC	 	 	 —	 	 	
(6)	 	
Merian	 	 	
(1)	 	 	 —	 	
Other 	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	
 	 	$	
83	 	$	
46	 	
 
Newmont has a 51.35% ownership interest in Minera Yanacocha S.R.L., with the remaining interests held by Compañia de Minas Buenaventura, S.A.A. (43.65%) and the International Finance Corporation (5%). Newmont consolidates Yanacocha in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements due to a majority voting interest.
 
Newmont has a 48.5% effective economic interest in PTNNT with remaining interests held by an affiliate of Sumitomo Corporation of Japan and various Indonesian entities. PTNNT operates the Batu Hijau copper and gold mine in Indonesia. Newmont consolidates Batu Hijau in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as the primary beneficiary in the variable interest entity.
 
Newmont has a 29.37% ownership interest in TMAC Resources Inc. (“TMAC”) , with the remaining interests held by TMAC management and various outside investors. Newmont’s retained investment in TMAC is accounted for as an equity method investment. Refer to Note 13 for additional information.
 
Newmont has a 75% economic interest in the Merian Project, with the remaining interests held by Staatsolie (a company wholly owned by the Republic of Suriname). Newmont consolidates the Merian Project through Surgold, an entity 100% directly owned by Newmont. The project began construction in August 2014 and is planned to be in commercial production by the fourth quarter of 2016. Newmont consolidates the Merian Project in its Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as the primary beneficiary in the variable interest entity.

14

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
The following summarizes the assets and liabilities, inclusive of deferred tax liabilities, of our consolidated variable interest entities (including noncontrolling interests).

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	At March 31, 2016	 	At December 31, 2015	 	
 	    	Batu Hijau	    	Merian	    	Batu Hijau	    	Merian	 	
Current assets	    	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	 	$	
680	 	$	
18	 	$	
419	 	$	
16	 	
Trade receivables	 	 	
147	 	 	 —	 	 	
179	 	 	 —	 	
Other current assets (1)	 	 	
446	 	 	
47	 	 	
362	 	 	
23	 	
 	 	 	
1,273	 	 	
65	 	 	
960	 	 	
39	 	
Non-current assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Property, plant and mine development, net	 	 	
1,072	 	 	
641	 	 	
1,103	 	 	
564	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads	 	 	
1,064	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,104	 	 	 —	 	
Other non-current assets (2)	 	 	
317	 	 	 —	 	 	
316	 	 	 —	 	
Total assets	 	$	
3,726	 	$	
706	 	$	
3,483	 	$	
603	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt	 	$	
327	 	$	 —	 	$	
140	 	$	 —	 	
Accounts Payable	 	 	
59	 	 	 —	 	 	
81	 	 	 —	 	
Other current liabilities (3)	 	 	
125	 	 	
38	 	 	
71	 	 	
35	 	
 	 	 	
511	 	 	
38	 	 	
292	 	 	
35	 	
Non-current liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	
187	 	 	 —	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities	 	 	
249	 	 	
8	 	 	
245	 	 	
8	 	
Other non-current liabilities (4)	 	 	
351	 	 	 —	 	 	
330	 	 	 —	 	
Total liabilities	 	$	
1,113	 	$	
46	 	$	
1,054	 	$	
43	 	

	(1)		Other current assets include other accounts receivables, inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads, prepaid assets, restricted cash, and other current assets.	
	(2)		Other non-current assets include tax receivables and other non-current assets.	
	(3)		Other current liabilities include employee-related benefits, tax payables, reclamation and remediation liabilities and other current liabilities.	
	(4)		Other non-current liabilities include deferred income tax liabilities and employee-related benefits.	

NOTE 8    INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
 
Basic income per common share is computed by dividing income available to Newmont common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income per common share is computed similarly except that weighted average common shares is increased to reflect all dilutive instruments, including employee stock awards and convertible debt instruments. The dilutive effects of Newmont’s dilutive securities

15

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
are calculated using the treasury stock method and only those instruments that result in a reduction in income per share are included in the calculation.

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	
78	 	$	
175	 	
Discontinued operations 	 	 	
(26)	 	 	
8	 	
 	 	$	
52	 	$	
183	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Weighted average common shares (millions):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic 	 	 	
530	 	 	
499	 	
Effect of employee stock-based awards 	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	
Diluted 	 	 	
531	 	 	
500	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) per common share	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations 	 	$	
0.15	 	$	
0.35	 	
Discontinued operations 	 	 	
(0.05)	 	 	
0.02	 	
 	 	$	
0.10	 	$	
0.37	 	
Diluted:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations 	 	$	
0.15	 	$	
0.35	 	
Discontinued operations 	 	 	
(0.05)	 	 	
0.02	 	
 	 	$	
0.10	 	$	
0.37	 	
 
Options to purchase 2 million and 3 million shares of common stock at weighted average exercise prices of $52 and $48 per share were outstanding at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares because their exercise prices exceeded the average price of the Company’s common stock for the respective periods presented.
 
Newmont is required to settle the principal amount of its 2017 Convertible Senior Note in cash and may elect to settle the remaining conversion premium (average share price in excess of the conversion price), if any, in cash, shares or a combination thereof. The effect of contingently convertible instruments on diluted earnings per share is calculated under the net share settlement method. The conversion price exceeded the Company’s share price for the periods presented, therefore no additional shares were included in the computation of diluted weighted average common shares.
 
NOTE 9    EMPLOYEE PENSION AND OTHER BENEFIT PLANS

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Pension benefit costs, net 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Service cost 	 	$	
7	 	$	
8	 	
Interest cost 	 	 	
12	 	 	
11	 	
Expected return on plan assets 	 	 	
(14)	 	 	
(15)	 	
Amortization, net	 	 	
6	 	 	
7	 	
 	 	$	
11	 	$	
11	 	

16

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Other benefit costs, net 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Service cost 	 	$	 —	 	$	
1	 	
Interest cost 	 	 	
1	 	 	
2	 	
Amortization, net	 	 	
(1)	 	 	 —	 	
 	 	$	 —	 	$	
3	 	
 
NOTE 10    STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Stock-based compensation:	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Performance leveraged stock units	 	$	
8	 	$	
10	 	
Restricted stock units	 	 	
6	 	 	
8	 	
Strategic stock units	 	 	
2	 	 	
2	 	
 	 	$	
16	 	$	
20	 	

 

NOTE 11    FAIR VALUE ACCOUNTING
 
Fair value accounting establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
 
Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
 
Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
 
Level 3 Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

17

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
The following tables set forth the Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 	 	Fair Value at March 31, 2016	 	
 	    	Total	    	Level 1	    	Level 2	    	Level 3	    	
Assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents 	 	$	
2,461	 	$	
2,461	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	
Restricted assets (1)	 	 	
223	 	 	
223	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Marketable equity securities: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Extractive industries	 	 	
30	 	 	
30	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Other	 	 	
16	 	 	
16	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Marketable debt securities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asset backed commercial paper 	 	 	
20	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
20	 	
Auction rate securities 	 	 	
7	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
7	 	
Trade receivable from provisional copper and
gold concentrate sales, net 	 	 	
232	 	 	
232	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
 	 	$	
2,989	 	$	
2,962	 	$	 —	 	$	
27	 	
Liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt (2)	 	$	
5,625	 	$	 —	 	$	
5,625	 	$	 —	 	
Derivative instruments, net: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Foreign exchange forward contracts	 	 	
41	 	 	 —	 	 	
41	 	 	 —	 	
Diesel forward contracts	 	 	
25	 	 	 —	 	 	
25	 	 	 —	 	
Boddington contingent consideration	 	 	
10	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
10	 	
Holt property royalty	 	 	
164	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
164	 	
 	 	$	
5,865	 	$	 —	 	$	
5,691	 	$	
174	 	

18

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	Fair Value at December 31, 2015	 	
 	    	Total	    	Level 1	    	Level 2	    	Level 3	    	
Assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents 	 	$	
2,782	 	$	
2,782	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	
Restricted assets (1)	 	 	
132	 	 	
132	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Marketable equity securities: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Extractive industries	 	 	
186	 	 	
186	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Other	 	 	
16	 	 	
16	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Marketable debt securities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asset backed commercial paper 	 	 	
18	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
18	 	
Auction rate securities 	 	 	
7	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
7	 	
Trade receivable from provisional copper and
gold concentrate sales, net 	 	 	
178	 	 	
178	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
 	 	$	
3,319	 	$	
3,294	 	$	 —	 	$	
25	 	
Liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt (2)	 	$	
5,469	 	$	 —	 	$	
5,469	 	$	 —	 	
Derivative instruments, net: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Foreign exchange forward contracts	 	 	
60	 	 	 —	 	 	
60	 	 	 —	 	
Diesel forward contracts	 	 	
32	 	 	 —	 	 	
32	 	 	 —	 	
Boddington contingent consideration	 	 	
10	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
10	 	
Holt property royalty	 	 	
129	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
129	 	
 	 	$	
5,700	 	$	 —	 	$	
5,561	 	$	
139	 	

	(1)		Restricted asset carrying amounts approximate their fair value.	
	(2)		Debt, exclusive of capital leases, is carried at amortized cost. The outstanding carrying value was $5,682 and $6,167 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. The fair value measurement of debt was based on prices obtained from readily available pricing sources.	
 
The fair values of the derivative instruments in the table above are presented on a net basis. The gross amounts related to the fair value of the derivatives instruments above are included in Note 12. All other fair value disclosures in the above table are presented on a gross basis.
 
The Company’s cash and cash equivalent instruments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices. The cash and cash equivalent instruments that are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets are primarily money market securities and U.S. Treasury securities.
 
The Company’s marketable equity securities are valued using quoted market prices in active markets and as such are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The securities are segregated based on industry. The fair value of the marketable equity securities is calculated as the quoted market price of the marketable equity security multiplied by the quantity of shares held by the Company.
 
The Company’s marketable debt securities include investments in auction rate securities and asset backed commercial paper. The Company reviews the fair value for auction rate securities and asset backed commercial paper on a quarterly basis. The marketable debt securities are traded in markets that are not active, trade infrequently and have little price transparency. Therefore, the investments are classified as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. See the table below which sets forth a summary of the quantitative and qualitative information related to the significant unobservable inputs used in the calculation of the fair value.
 
The Company’s net trade receivable from provisional copper and gold concentrate sales, subject to final pricing, is valued using quoted market prices based on forward curves and, as such, is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

19

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
 
The Company’s derivative instruments are valued using pricing models and the Company generally uses similar models to value similar instruments. Valuation models require a variety of inputs, including contractual terms, market prices, forward curves, measures of volatility, and correlations of such inputs. The Company’s derivatives trade in liquid markets, and as such, model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
The estimated value of the Boddington contingent royalty was determined using a (1) discounted cash flow model, (2) Monte Carlo valuation model to simulate future gold and copper prices using the Company’s long term gold and copper prices and (3) Monte Carlo valuation model to simulate costs applicable to sales using the Company’s Australian to U.S. dollar exchange rate. This contingent royalty is capped at $100, of which $72 has been paid to date. The liability remained unchanged at $10 for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
 
The estimated fair value of the Holt sliding scale royalty was determined using a (1) discounted cash flow model,  (2) Monte Carlo valuation model to simulate future gold prices using the Company’s long term gold prices, (3) various gold production scenarios from reserve and resource information and (4) weighted average discount rate. The sliding scale royalty liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
 
The following tables set forth a summary of the quantitative and qualitative information related to the unobservable inputs used in the calculation of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 	    	   At March 31,   	    	 	    	 	    	Range/Weighted	 	
Description	    	2016	    	Valuation technique	    	Unobservable input	    	average	 	
Auction rate securities	 	$	
7	 	Risk-adjusted indicative price	 	Recoverability rate	 	 	
85	%	
Asset backed commercial paper	 	$	
20	 	Risk-adjusted indicative price	 	Recoverability rate	 	 	
90	%	
Boddington contingent consideration	 	$	
10	 	Monte Carlo	 	Discount rate	 	 	
3.74	%	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Short-term gold price	 	$	
1,183	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term gold price	 	$	
1,300	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Short-term copper price	 	$	
2.12	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term copper price	 	$	
3.00	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term Australian to U.S. dollar exchange rate	 	$	
0.80	 	
Holt property royalty	 	$	
164	 	Monte Carlo	 	Discount rate	 	 	
3.86	%	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Short-term gold price	 	$	
1,183	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term gold price	 	$	
1,300	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Gold production scenarios (in 000's of ounces)	 	 	381 - 1,620	 	

20

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	    	At December 31, 	    	 	    	 	    	Range/Weighted	 	
Description	    	2015	    	Valuation technique	    	Unobservable input	    	average	 	
Auction rate securities	 	$	
7	 	Risk-adjusted indicative price	 	Recoverability rate	 	 	
85	%	
Asset backed commercial paper	 	$	
18	 	Risk-adjusted indicative price	 	Recoverability rate	 	 	
90	%	
Boddington contingent consideration	 	$	
10	 	Monte Carlo	 	Discount rate	 	 	
5.32	%	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Short-term gold price	 	$	
1,106	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term gold price	 	$	
1,300	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Short-term copper price	 	$	
2.22	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term copper price	 	$	
3.00	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term Australian to U.S. dollar exchange rate	 	$	
0.80	 	
Holt property royalty	 	$	
129	 	Monte Carlo	 	Discount rate	 	 	
5.06	%	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Short-term gold price	 	$	
1,106	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Long-term gold price	 	$	
1,300	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Gold production scenarios (in 000's of ounces)	 	 	398 - 1,636	 	
 
The following tables set forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets and liabilities:

 	 	 	 	Asset	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Auction	 	Backed	 	 	 	Boddington	 	Holt	 	 	 	
 	 	Rate	 	Commercial	 	Total	 	Contingent	 	Property	 	Total	 	
 	   	Securities	   	Paper	   	   Assets   	   	Consideration (1)	   	Royalty (2)	   	Liabilities	   	
Fair value at December 31, 2015	 	$	
7	 	$	
18	 	$	
25	 	$	
10	 	$	
129	 	$	
139	 	
Settlements	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(2)	 	 	
(2)	 	
Revaluation	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	
37	 	 	
37	 	
Fair value at March 31, 2016	 	$	
7	 	$	
20	 	$	
27	 	$	
10	 	$	
164	 	$	
174	 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	Asset	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Auction	 	Backed	 	 	 	Boddington	 	Holt	 	 	 	
 	 	Rate	 	Commercial	 	Total	 	Contingent	 	Property	 	Total	 	
 	   	Securities	   	Paper	   	   Assets   	   	Consideration (1)	   	Royalty (2)	   	Liabilities	   	
Fair value at December 31, 2014	 	$	
6	 	$	
24	 	$	
30	 	$	
10	 	$	
179	 	$	
189	 	
Settlements	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(3)	 	 	
(3)	 	
Revaluation	 	 	
1	 	 	
(3)	 	 	
(2)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(12)	 	 	
(12)	 	
Fair value at March 31, 2015	 	$	
7	 	$	
21	 	$	
28	 	$	
10	 	$	
164	 	$	
174	 	

	(1)		The gain (loss) recognized is included in Other expense, net .	
	(2)		The gain (loss) recognized is included in Income (loss) from discontinued operations .	

NOTE 12    DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS  
 
The Company’s strategy is to provide shareholders with leverage to changes in gold and copper prices by selling its production at spot market prices. Consequently, the Company does not hedge its gold and copper sales. The Company has and will continue to manage certain risks associated with commodity input costs, interest rates and foreign currencies using the derivative market. All of the derivative instruments described below were transacted for risk management purposes and qualify as cash flow hedges.

21

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
Cash Flow Hedges
 
The following foreign currency and diesel contracts are designated as cash flow hedges, and as such, the effective portion of unrealized changes in market value have been recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and are reclassified to income during the period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains and losses from hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in current earnings .  
 
Foreign Currency Contracts
 
The Company had the following foreign currency derivative contracts in Asia Pacific outstanding at March 31, 2016:

 	 	Expected   Maturity Date	 	
 	    	2016	    	2017	    	2018	    	Total/Average	    	
A$ Operating Fixed Forward Contracts: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
A$ notional (millions) 	 	
112	 	
105	 	
6	 	
223	 	
Average rate ($/A$) 	 	
0.95	 	
0.93	 	
0.92	 	
0.94	 	
Expected hedge ratio	 	
12	%    	
8	%  	
4	%  	 	 	
 
The A$ hedges run through the first quarter of 2018.
 
Diesel Fixed Forward Contracts
 
The Company had the following diesel derivative contracts in North America outstanding at March 31, 2016:

 	 	Expected Maturity Date	 	
 	    	2016	    	2017	    	Total/Average	    	
Diesel Fixed Forward Contracts:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diesel gallons (millions) 	 	
17	 	
11	 	
28	 	
Average rate ($/gallon) 	 	
2.22	 	
1.84	 	
2.06	 	
Expected hedge ratio	 	
58	%   	
38	%  	 	 	
 
Newmont hedges a portion of its operating cost exposure related to diesel consumed at its Nevada operations to reduce the variability in diesel prices. The hedging instruments consist of a series of financially settled fixed forward contracts with expiration dates up to two years.
 
Derivative Instrument Fair Values
 
The Company had the following derivative instruments designated as hedges at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 	 	Fair Values of Derivative Instruments	 	
 	 	At March 31, 2016	 	
 	  	Other	  	Other	  	Other	  	Other	 	
 	  	Current	  	Non-current	  	Current	  	Non-current	 	
 	    	Assets	    	Assets	    	Liabilities	    	Liabilities	    	
Foreign currency exchange contracts:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
A$ operating fixed forwards 	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
27	 	$	
14	 	
Diesel fixed forwards	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
22	 	 	
3	 	
Total derivative instruments (Note 17)	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
49	 	$	
17	 	

22

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	Fair Values of Derivative Instruments	 	
 	 	At December 31, 2015	 	
 	  	Other	  	Other	  	Other	  	Other	 	
 	  	Current	  	Non-current	  	Current	  	Non-current	 	
 	    	Assets	    	Assets	    	Liabilities	    	Liabilities	    	
Foreign currency exchange contracts:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
A$ operating fixed forwards 	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
36	 	$	
24	 	
Diesel fixed forwards	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
27	 	 	
5	 	
Total derivative instruments (Note 17)	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
63	 	$	
29	 	
 
As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, all derivative instruments held by the Company were subject to enforceable master netting arrangements held by various financial institutions. In general, the terms of the Company’s agreements provide for offsetting of amounts payable or receivable between it and the counterparty, at the election of both parties, for transactions that occur on the same date and in the same currency. The Company’s agreements also provide that in the event of an early termination, the counterparties have the right to offset amounts owed or owing under that and any other agreement with the same counterparty. The Company’s accounting policy is to not offset these positions in its accompanying balance sheets. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, all gross amounts presented in the accompanying balance sheets were in a liability position, with no offsetting (asset) amounts.
 
The following table shows the location and amount of gains (losses) reported in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements related to the Company’s hedges.

 	 	Foreign Currency	 	Diesel Fixed	 	Interest	 	
 	 	Exchange Contracts	 	Forward Contracts	 	Rate Contracts	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	 	
For the three months ended March 31, 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash flow hedging relationships:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain (loss) recognized in Other comprehensive income (loss) (effective portion)	 	$	
7	 	$	
(27)	 	$	
(2)	 	$	
(5)	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	
Gain (loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into income (loss) (effective portion) (1)	 	$	
(10)	 	$	
(7)	 	$	
(9)	 	$	
(7)	 	$	
(3)	 	$	
(5)	 	
Gain (loss) reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into income (loss) (ineffective portion)   (2)	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	

	(1)		The gain (loss) recognized for the effective portion of cash flow hedges is included in Cost applicable to sales and Interest expense ,   net .  	
	(2)		The ineffective portion recognized for cash flow hedges is included in Other income, net.	
 
Based on fair values at March 31, 2016, the amount to be reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) , net of tax to income for derivative instruments during the next 12 months is a loss of approximately $48.
 
Provisional Gold and Copper Sales
 
The Company’s provisional gold and copper concentrate sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of the gold and copper concentrates at the prevailing indices’ prices at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through earnings each period prior to final settlement.
 
At March 31, 2016, Newmont had gold and copper sales of 227,000 ounces and 194 million pounds priced at an average of $1,238 per ounce and $2.19 per pound, respectively, subject to final pricing over the next several months.

23

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
 
NOTE 13    INVESTMENTS  

 	 	At March 31, 2016	 	
 	 	Cost/Equity	 	Unrealized	 	Fair/Equity	 	
 	    	Basis	    	Gain	    	Loss	    	Basis	 	
Current: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Marketable Equity Securities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gabriel Resources Ltd.	 	$	
5	 	$	
2	 	$	 —	 	$	
7	 	
Other	 	 	
15	 	 	
6	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
20	 	
 	 	$	
20	 	$	
8	 	$	
(1)	 	$	
27	 	
Non-current: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Marketable Debt Securities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asset backed commercial paper	 	$	
19	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	
20	 	
Auction rate securities 	 	 	
8	 	 	 —	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
7	 	
 	 	 	
27	 	 	
1	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
27	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Marketable Equity Securities	 	 	
18	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
19	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other investments, at cost   	 	 	
6	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Equity Method Investments: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
TMAC	 	 	
101	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
101	 	
Minera La Zanja S.R.L.	 	 	
69	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
69	 	
Novo Resources Corp.	 	 	
15	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
15	 	
Euronimba Ltd.	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	
 	 	$	
239	 	$	
2	 	$	
(1)	 	$	
240	 	

24

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	At December 31, 2015	 	
 	 	Cost/Equity	 	Unrealized	 	Fair/Equity	 	
 	    	Basis	    	Gain	    	Loss	    	Basis	 	
Current: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Marketable Equity Securities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gabriel Resources Ltd.	 	$	
5	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
5	 	
Other	 	 	
14	 	 	
2	 	 	
(2)	 	 	
14	 	
 	 	$	
19	 	$	
2	 	$	
(2)	 	$	
19	 	
Non-current: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Marketable Debt Securities: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asset backed commercial paper	 	$	
17	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	
18	 	
Auction rate securities 	 	 	
8	 	 	 —	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
7	 	
 	 	 	
25	 	 	
1	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
25	 	
Marketable Equity Securities: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Regis Resources Ltd.	 	 	
81	 	 	
82	 	 	 —	 	 	
163	 	
Other 	 	 	
17	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	 	
20	 	
 	 	 	
98	 	 	
85	 	 	 —	 	 	
183	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other investments, at cost   	 	 	
6	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Equity Method Investments: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
TMAC	 	 	
101	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
101	 	
Minera La Zanja S.R.L.	 	 	
71	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
71	 	
Novo Resources Corp.	 	 	
14	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
14	 	
Euronimba Ltd.	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	
 	 	$	
317	 	$	
86	 	$	
(1)	 	$	
402	 	
 
In March 2016, the Company sold its investment in Regis Resources Ltd. for $184, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $103 recorded in Other income, net . The cost of the investment sold was determined using the specific identification method.
 
During the first quarter of 2016, Newmont participated in the TMAC offering acquiring 242,979 shares for C$2, maintaining its 29.37% ownership interest. During 2015, Newmont determined that TMAC was no longer considered a variable interest entity, and should no longer be consolidated into Newmont’s financial results due to a number of financing events which took place during the year. Newmont deconsolidated the assets, liabilities, and non-controlling interest related to TMAC and recognized a gain of $76, recorded within Other income, net ,   during the third quarter of 2015. The fair value of the retained investment was valued utilizing the market approach applying the IPO share price. Newmont’s retained investment in TMAC is accounted for as an equity method investment.
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recognized no investment impairments for other-than-temporary declines in value. As of March 31, 2016, there was a $4 increase in the fair value of marketable securities previously impaired, primarily due to Pilot Gold and Gabriel Resources Ltd. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company recognized investment impairments for other-than-temporary declines in value of $57, primarily related to Regis Resources Ltd., as a result of the continued decline in stock price. As of March 31, 2015, there was an $18 decrease in the fair value of marketable securities previously impaired, primarily due to Gabriel Resources Ltd.

25

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
The following tables present the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments with unrealized losses that are deemed to be temporarily impaired, aggregated by length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position:

 	 	Less   than 12 Months	 	12 Months or Greater	 	Total	 	
At March 31, 2016	    	Fair Value	    	Unrealized
Losses	    	Fair Value	    	Unrealized
Losses	    	Fair Value	    	Unrealized
Losses	 	
Marketable equity securities	 	$	
3	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
3	 	$	
1	 	
Auction rate securities 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
7	 	 	
1	 	 	
7	 	 	
1	 	
 	 	$	
3	 	$	
1	 	$	
7	 	$	
1	 	$	
10	 	$	
2	 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Less than 12 Months	 	12 Months or Greater	 	Total	 	
At December 31, 2015	    	Fair Value	    	Unrealized
Losses	    	Fair Value	    	Unrealized
Losses	    	Fair Value	    	Unrealized
Losses	 	
Marketable equity securities	 	$	
5	 	$	
2	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
5	 	$	
2	 	
Auction rate securities 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
7	 	 	
1	 	 	
7	 	 	
1	 	
 	 	$	
5	 	$	
2	 	$	
7	 	$	
1	 	$	
12	 	$	
3	 	
 
While the fair value of some of the Company’s investments in marketable equity securities and auction rate securities are below their respective cost, the Company views these declines as temporary. The Company has the ability and intends to hold its securities until maturity or such time that the market recovers.
 
NOTE 14    INVENTORIES  

 	 	    At March 31,     	 	At December 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Materials and supplies	 	$	
459	 	$	
454	 	
In-process	 	 	
131	 	 	
118	 	
Concentrate and copper cathode	 	 	
109	 	 	
128	 	
Precious metals	 	 	
11	 	 	
10	 	
 	 	$	
710	 	$	
710	 	

NOTE 15    STOCKPILES AND ORE ON LEACH PADS  

 	 	    At March 31,     	 	At December 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Current:	 	 	   	 	 	   	 	
Stockpiles	 	$	
494	 	$	
554	 	
Ore on leach pads	 	 	
370	 	 	
342	 	
 	 	$	
864	 	$	
896	 	
Non-current:	 	 	   	 	 	   	 	
Stockpiles	 	$	
2,655	 	$	
2,622	 	
Ore on leach pads	 	 	
366	 	 	
378	 	
 	 	$	
3,021	 	$	
3,000	 	

26

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	    At March 31,     	 	At December 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
407	 	$	
394	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
98	 	 	
106	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
339	 	 	
329	 	
CC&V	 	 	
348	 	 	
319	 	
Yanacocha	 	 	
399	 	 	
440	 	
Merian	 	 	
5	 	 	
4	 	
Boddington	 	 	
390	 	 	
390	 	
Tanami	 	 	
9	 	 	
12	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
107	 	 	
109	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
1,192	 	 	
1,218	 	
Ahafo	 	 	
469	 	 	
456	 	
Akyem	 	 	
122	 	 	
119	 	
 	 	$	
3,885	 	$	
3,896	 	
 
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company recorded write-downs of $50 classified as components of Costs applicable to sales and write-downs of $24 classified as components of Depreciation and amortization , respectively, to reduce the carrying value of stockpiles and ore on leach pads to net realizable value. Adjustments to net realizable value are a result of higher future processing costs in addition to stripping campaigns driving lower grade and lower recovery resulting in higher costs per unit. Of the write-downs in the first quarter of 2016, $27 is related to Carlin, $2 to Twin Creeks, and $45 to Yanacocha.

NOTE 16    DEBT
 
On March 29, 2016, the Company accepted for purchase approximately $274 of its 2019 Notes and $226 of its 2039 Notes through a debt tender offer. The company recorded a net pre-tax loss of $4 in Other income, net as a result of the debt tender offer. Additionally, the Company reclassified $2 in Interest expense, net from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the acceleration of the unrealized gains on the treasury rate lock contracts which were entered into upon issuance of the Notes in 2009.
 
There was $94 and $nil in current restricted cash at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, for payments on the PTNNT revolving credit facility as required by local statutes. Current restricted cash is included in Other current assets .
 
Scheduled minimum debt repayments are $143 for the remainder of 2016, $765 in 2017, $nil in 2018, $901 in 2019, $nil in 2020 and $3,974 thereafter. Scheduled minimum capital lease repayments are $4 in 2016, $6 in 2017, $4 in 2018, $4 in 2019, $1 in 2020 and $3 thereafter.

27

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NOTE 17    OTHER LIABILITIES

 	 	    At March 31,     	 	At December 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	
Other current liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accrued operating costs	 	$	
106	 	$	
105	 	
Accrued capital expenditures	 	 	
95	 	 	
121	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities	 	 	
70	 	 	
71	 	
Accrued interest	 	 	
67	 	 	
71	 	
Derivative instruments	 	 	
49	 	 	
63	 	
Royalties	 	 	
46	 	 	
63	 	
Holt property royalty	 	 	
12	 	 	
10	 	
Taxes other than income and mining	 	 	
8	 	 	
9	 	
Other	 	 	
32	 	 	
27	 	
 	 	$	
485	 	$	
540	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other non-current liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Holt property royalty	 	$	
152	 	$	
119	 	
Income and mining taxes 	 	 	
79	 	 	
78	 	
Power supply agreements	 	 	
32	 	 	
31	 	
Social development obligations	 	 	
29	 	 	
29	 	
Derivative instruments	 	 	
17	 	 	
29	 	
Boddington contingent consideration	 	 	
10	 	 	
10	 	
Other 	 	 	
14	 	 	
14	 	
 	 	$	
333	 	$	
310	 	

28

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NOTE 18    CHANGES IN EQUITY  

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	
 	  	2016	 	2015	 	
Common stock:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
At beginning of period	     	$	
847	    	$	
798	 	
Stock-based awards	 	 	
2	 	 	
2	 	
At end of period 	 	 	
849	 	 	
800	 	
Additional paid-in capital:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
At beginning of period 	 	 	
9,427	 	 	
8,712	 	
Stock-based awards	 	 	
10	 	 	
17	 	
Sale of noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	
12	 	
At end of period 	 	 	
9,437	 	 	
8,741	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
At beginning of period 	 	 	
(334)	 	 	
(478)	 	
Other comprehensive income (loss)	 	 	
(52)	 	 	
(14)	 	
At end of period 	 	 	
(386)	 	 	
(492)	 	
Retained earnings:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
At beginning of period 	 	 	
1,410	 	 	
1,242	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders 	 	 	
52	 	 	
183	 	
Dividends paid	 	 	
(13)	 	 	
(12)	 	
At end of period 	 	 	
1,449	 	 	
1,413	 	
Noncontrolling interests:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
At beginning of period 	 	 	
2,942	 	 	
2,815	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 	 	 	
83	 	 	
46	 	
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests	 	 	
(146)	 	 	
(3)	 	
Funding from noncontrolling interests, net	 	 	
26	 	 	
24	 	
Sale of noncontrolling interests, net	 	 	 —	 	 	
22	 	
Other	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
(3)	 	
At end of period 	 	 	
2,904	 	 	
2,901	 	
Total equity 	 	$	
14,253	 	$	
13,363	 	

 
NOTE 19      RECLASSIFICATIONS OUT OF ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)  

 	 	 	 	 	 	Pension and	 	Changes in	 	 	 	
 	 	Unrealized 	 	Foreign	 	other	 	fair value of	 	 	 	
 	 	(loss) on	 	currency	 	post ‑retirement	 	cash flow	 	 	 	
 	 	marketable	 	translation	 	benefit	 	hedge	 	 	 	
 	 	securities, net	 	adjustments	 	adjustments	 	instruments	 	Total	 	
Balance at December 31, 2015	  	$	
(43)	  	$	
116	  	$	
(207)	  	$	
(200)	  	$	
(334)	 	
Change in other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	 	 	
26	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	 	
5	 	 	
34	 	
Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	 	 	
(103)	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
14	 	 	
(86)	 	
Net current-period change	 	 	
(77)	 	 	
3	 	 	
3	 	 	
19	 	 	
(52)	 	
Balance at March 31, 2016	 	$	
(120)	 	$	
119	 	$	
(204)	 	$	
(181)	 	$	
(386)	 	

29

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

Details   about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components	 	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	 	Affected Line Item in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	     	 	 	
Marketable securities adjustments:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sale of marketable securities	 	$	
(103)	 	$	
(1)	 	Other income, net	 	
Impairment of marketable securities	 	 	 —	 	 	
57	 	Other income, net	 	
Total before tax	 	 	
(103)	 	 	
56	 	 	 	
Tax benefit (expense)	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 	
Net of tax	 	$	
(103)	 	$	
56	 	 	 	
Pension and other post-retirement benefit adjustments:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Amortization	 	$	
5	 	$	
7	 	(1)	 	
Tax benefit (expense)	 	 	
(2)	 	 	
(2)	 	 	 	
Net of tax	 	$	
3	 	$	
5	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Hedge instruments adjustments:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Operating cash flow hedges (effective portion)	 	$	
19	 	$	
14	 	Costs applicable to sales	 	
Operating cash flow hedges (ineffective portion)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(1)	 	Other income, net	 	
Interest rate contracts	 	 	
3	 	 	
5	 	Interest expense, net	 	
Total before tax	 	 	
22	 	 	
18	 	 	 	
Tax benefit (expense)	 	 	
(8)	 	 	
(6)	 	 	 	
Net of tax	 	$	
14	 	$	
12	 	 	 	
Total reclassifications for the period, net of tax	 	$	
(86)	 	$	
73	 	 	 	

	(1)		Included in General and administrative or included as a component of Costs applicable to sales   which are incurred in the inventory/production process . Refer to Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 on Form 10-K for information on costs that benefit the inventory/production process.	

 
NOTE 20    NET CHANGE IN OPERATING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES  
 
Net cash provided by operating activities attributable to the net change in operating assets and liabilities is composed of the following:

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	
 	 	2016	 	2015	 	
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Trade and other accounts receivables 	    	$	
(31)	    	$	
38	 	
Inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads 	 	 	
(37)	 	 	
(60)	 	
EGR refinery and other assets (1)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(657)	 	
Other assets 	 	 	
(5)	 	 	
85	 	
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities 	 	 	
(61)	 	 	
(112)	 	
EGR refinery and other liabilities (1)	 	 	 —	 	 	
657	 	
Reclamation liabilities 	 	 	
(6)	 	 	
(24)	 	
 	 	$	
(140)	 	$	
(73)	 	

	(1)		On July 24, 2015, the Company sold its ownership interest in European Gold Refinery Holdings (“EGR”).	

30

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NOTE 21    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  
 
The following Condensed Consolidating Financial Statements are presented to satisfy disclosure requirements of Rule 3-10(e) of Regulation S-X resulting from the inclusion of Newmont USA Limited (“Newmont USA”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont, as a co-registrant with Newmont on debt securities issued under a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 filed under the Securities Act of 1933 under which securities of Newmont (including debt securities guaranteed by Newmont USA) may be issued (the “Shelf Registration Statement”). In accordance with Rule 3-10(e) of Regulation S-X, Newmont USA, as the subsidiary guarantor, is 100% owned by Newmont, the guarantees are full and unconditional, and no other subsidiary of Newmont guaranteed any security issued under the Shelf Registration Statement. There are no restrictions on the ability of Newmont or Newmont USA to obtain funds from its subsidiaries by dividend or loan.
 
During the first quarter of 2016, the Company conducted certain restructurings for tax planning purposes which modified the entities owned by the guarantor and impacted their respective Condensed Consolidating Financial statements.

31

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016	 	
 	 	(Issuer)	 	(Guarantor)	 	(Non-Guarantor)	 	 	 	Newmont	 	
 	 	Newmont	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mining	 	
 	 	Mining	 	Newmont	 	Other	 	 	 	Corporation	 	
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operation	    	Corporation	    	USA	    	Subsidiaries	    	Eliminations	    	Consolidated	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales	 	$	 —	 	$	
471	 	$	
1,561	 	$	 —	 	$	
2,032	 	
Costs and expenses	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (1)	 	 	 —	 	 	
306	 	 	
775	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,081	 	
Depreciation and amortization 	 	 	 —	 	 	
84	 	 	
238	 	 	 —	 	 	
322	 	
Reclamation and remediation	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
22	 	 	 —	 	 	
25	 	
Exploration 	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	
24	 	 	 —	 	 	
30	 	
Advanced projects, research and development 	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	
26	 	 	 —	 	 	
28	 	
General and administrative 	 	 	 —	 	 	
17	 	 	
40	 	 	 —	 	 	
57	 	
Other expense, net	 	 	 —	 	 	
4	 	 	
14	 	 	 —	 	 	
18	 	
 	 	 	 —	 	 	
422	 	 	
1,139	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,561	 	
Other income (expense) 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other income, net 	 	 	
9	 	 	 —	 	 	
89	 	 	 —	 	 	
98	 	
Interest income - intercompany 	 	 	
30	 	 	 —	 	 	
9	 	 	
(39)	 	 	 —	 	
Interest expense - intercompany 	 	 	
(8)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(31)	 	 	
39	 	 	 —	 	
Interest expense, net 	 	 	
(71)	 	 	
(2)	 	 	
(6)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(79)	 	
 	 	 	
(40)	 	 	
(2)	 	 	
61	 	 	 —	 	 	
19	 	
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items 	 	 	
(40)	 	 	
47	 	 	
483	 	 	 —	 	 	
490	 	
Income and mining tax benefit (expense)	 	 	
75	 	 	
(11)	 	 	
(388)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(324)	 	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates 	 	 	
17	 	 	
(274)	 	 	
2	 	 	
250	 	 	
(5)	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations 	 	 	
52	 	 	
(238)	 	 	
97	 	 	
250	 	 	
161	 	
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(26)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(26)	 	
Net income (loss)	 	 	
52	 	 	
(238)	 	 	
71	 	 	
250	 	 	
135	 	
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(83)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(83)	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
52	 	$	
(238)	 	$	
(12)	 	$	
250	 	$	
52	 	
Comprehensive income (loss)	 	$	 —	 	$	
(232)	 	$	
10	 	$	
305	 	$	
83	 	
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(83)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(83)	 	
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	 —	 	$	
(232)	 	$	
(73)	 	$	
305	 	$	 —	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .	

32

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015	 	
 	 	(Issuer)	 	(Guarantor)	 	(Non-Guarantor)	 	 	 	Newmont	 	
 	 	Newmont	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mining	 	
 	 	Mining	 	Newmont	 	Other	 	 	 	Corporation	 	
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operation	    	Corporation	    	USA	    	Subsidiaries	    	Eliminations	    	Consolidated	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales	 	$	 —	 	$	
502	 	$	
1,470	 	$	 —	 	$	
1,972	 	
Costs and expenses	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (1)	 	 	 —	 	 	
289	 	 	
738	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,027	 	
Depreciation and amortization 	 	 	
1	 	 	
77	 	 	
211	 	 	 —	 	 	
289	 	
Reclamation and remediation	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
20	 	 	 —	 	 	
23	 	
Exploration 	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	
27	 	 	 —	 	 	
33	 	
Advanced projects, research and development 	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
25	 	 	 —	 	 	
28	 	
General and administrative 	 	 	 —	 	 	
14	 	 	
44	 	 	 —	 	 	
58	 	
Other expense, net	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
14	 	 	 —	 	 	
17	 	
 	 	 	
1	 	 	
395	 	 	
1,079	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,475	 	
Other income (expense) 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Other income, net 	 	 	
(28)	 	 	
9	 	 	
30	 	 	 —	 	 	
11	 	
Interest income - intercompany 	 	 	
33	 	 	 —	 	 	
5	 	 	
(38)	 	 	 —	 	
Interest expense - intercompany 	 	 	
(3)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(35)	 	 	
38	 	 	 —	 	
Interest expense, net 	 	 	
(77)	 	 	
(1)	 	 	
(7)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(85)	 	
 	 	 	
(75)	 	 	
8	 	 	
(7)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(74)	 	
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items 	 	 	
(76)	 	 	
115	 	 	
384	 	 	 —	 	 	
423	 	
Income and mining tax benefit (expense)	 	 	
25	 	 	
(29)	 	 	
(189)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(193)	 	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates 	 	 	
234	 	 	
(11)	 	 	
23	 	 	
(255)	 	 	
(9)	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations 	 	 	
183	 	 	
75	 	 	
218	 	 	
(255)	 	 	
221	 	
Income (loss) from discontinued operations 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
8	 	 	 —	 	 	
8	 	
Net income (loss)	 	 	
183	 	 	
75	 	 	
226	 	 	
(255)	 	 	
229	 	
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(77)	 	 	
31	 	 	
(46)	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
183	 	$	
75	 	$	
149	 	$	
(224)	 	$	
183	 	
Comprehensive income (loss)	 	$	
170	 	$	
82	 	$	
200	 	$	
(237)	 	$	
215	 	
Comprehensive loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(71)	 	 	
25	 	 	
(46)	 	
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
170	 	$	
82	 	$	
129	 	$	
(212)	 	$	
169	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .	

33

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 2016	 	
 	 	(Issuer)	 	(Guarantor)	 	(Non-Guarantor)	 	 	 	 	Newmont	 	
 	 	Newmont	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mining	 	
 	 	Mining	 	Newmont	 	Other	 	 	 	 	Corporation	 	
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows	    	Corporation	    	USA	    	Subsidiaries	    	Eliminations	    	Consolidated	 	
Operating activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash provided by operating activities	 	$	
757	 	$	
40	 	$	
555	 	$	
(830)	 	$	
522	 	
Investing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Additions to property, plant and mine development 	 	 	 —	 	 	
(66)	 	 	
(231)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(297)	 	
Sales of investments	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
184	 	 	 —	 	 	
184	 	
Proceeds from sale of other assets	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	
Other 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(4)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(4)	 	
Net cash used in investing activities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
(66)	 	 	
(45)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(111)	 	
Financing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Repayment of debt	 	 	
(498)	 	 	
(1)	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(499)	 	
Net intercompany borrowings (repayments)	 	 	
(246)	 	 	
(320)	 	 	
566	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Funding from noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
12	 	 	 —	 	 	
12	 	
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(146)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(146)	 	
Dividends paid to common stockholders 	 	 	
(13)	 	 	
(830)	 	 	 —	 	 	
830	 	 	
(13)	 	
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(91)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(91)	 	
Other 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(1)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(1)	 	
Net cash used in financing activities 	 	 	
(757)	 	 	
(1,151)	 	 	
340	 	 	
830	 	 	
(738)	 	
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 	 	 	 —	 	 	
(1,177)	 	 	
856	 	 	 —	 	 	
(321)	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,181	 	 	
1,601	 	 	 —	 	 	
2,782	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 	 	$	 —	 	$	
4	 	$	
2,457	 	$	 —	 	$	
2,461	 	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 2015	 	
 	 	(Issuer)	 	(Guarantor)	 	(Non-Guarantor)	 	 	 	 	Newmont	 	
 	 	Newmont	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mining	 	
 	 	Mining	 	Newmont	 	Other	 	 	 	 	Corporation	 	
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows	    	Corporation	    	USA	    	Subsidiaries	    	Eliminations	    	Consolidated	 	
Operating activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash provided by operating activities	 	$	
102	 	$	
28	 	$	
495	 	$	 —	 	$	
625	 	
Investing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Additions to property, plant and mine development 	 	 	 —	 	 	
(81)	 	 	
(203)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(284)	 	
Sales of investments	 	 	 —	 	 	
25	 	 	
4	 	 	 —	 	 	
29	 	
Proceeds from sale of other assets	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	
38	 	 	 —	 	 	
44	 	
Other 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(3)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(3)	 	
Net cash used in investing activities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
(50)	 	 	
(164)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(214)	 	
Financing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Repayment of debt	 	 	
(200)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(5)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(205)	 	
Net intercompany borrowings (repayments)	 	 	
112	 	 	
(20)	 	 	
(92)	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Sale of noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
34	 	 	 —	 	 	
37	 	
Funding from noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
47	 	 	 —	 	 	
47	 	
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(3)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(3)	 	
Dividends paid to common stockholders 	 	 	
(12)	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(12)	 	
(Increase) decrease in restricted cash	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
(56)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(55)	 	
Other 	 	 	
(2)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(3)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(5)	 	
Net cash used in financing activities 	 	 	
(102)	 	 	
(16)	 	 	
(78)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(196)	 	
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
(20)	 	 	 —	 	 	
(20)	 	
Net change in cash and cash equivalents 	 	 	 —	 	 	
(38)	 	 	
233	 	 	 —	 	 	
195	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,097	 	 	
1,306	 	 	 —	 	 	
2,403	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 	 	$	 —	 	$	
1,059	 	$	
1,539	 	$	 —	 	$	
2,598	 	

34

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	At March 31, 2016	 	
 	 	(Issuer)	 	(Guarantor)	 	(Non-Guarantor)	 	 	 	 	Newmont	 	
 	 	Newmont	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mining	 	
 	 	Mining	 	Newmont	 	Other	 	 	 	Corporation	 	
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet	    	Corporation	    	USA	    	Subsidiaries	    	Eliminations	    	Consolidated	 	
Assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents 	 	$	 —	 	$	
4	 	$	
2,457	 	$	 —	 	$	
2,461	 	
Trade receivables 	 	 	 —	 	 	
36	 	 	
237	 	 	 —	 	 	
273	 	
Other accounts receivables	 	 	 —	 	 	
8	 	 	
214	 	 	 —	 	 	
222	 	
Intercompany receivable	 	 	
4,904	 	 	
5,392	 	 	
9,180	 	 	
(19,476)	 	 	 —	 	
Investments	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
27	 	 	 —	 	 	
27	 	
Inventories 	 	 	 —	 	 	
150	 	 	
560	 	 	 —	 	 	
710	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads 	 	 	 —	 	 	
218	 	 	
646	 	 	 —	 	 	
864	 	
Other current assets	 	 	 —	 	 	
40	 	 	
183	 	 	 —	 	 	
223	 	
Current assets 	 	 	
4,904	 	 	
5,848	 	 	
13,504	 	 	
(19,476)	 	 	
4,780	 	
Property, plant and mine development, net 	 	 	
25	 	 	
3,184	 	 	
11,111	 	 	
(36)	 	 	
14,284	 	
Investments 	 	 	 —	 	 	
15	 	 	
225	 	 	 —	 	 	
240	 	
Investments in subsidiaries 	 	 	
14,472	 	 	
1,576	 	 	 —	 	 	
(16,048)	 	 	 —	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads 	 	 	 —	 	 	
619	 	 	
2,402	 	 	 —	 	 	
3,021	 	
Deferred income tax assets 	 	 	
297	 	 	
524	 	 	
1,202	 	 	
(490)	 	 	
1,533	 	
Non-current intercompany receivable	 	 	
1,734	 	 	
498	 	 	
110	 	 	
(2,342)	 	 	 —	 	
Other non-current assets 	 	 	 —	 	 	
223	 	 	
472	 	 	 —	 	 	
695	 	
Total assets 	 	$	
21,432	 	$	
12,487	 	$	
29,026	 	$	
(38,392)	 	$	
24,553	 	
Liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt 	 	$	 —	 	$	
3	 	$	
332	 	$	 —	 	$	
335	 	
Accounts payable 	 	 	 —	 	 	
60	 	 	
307	 	 	 —	 	 	
367	 	
Intercompany payable	 	 	
4,582	 	 	
4,694	 	 	
10,200	 	 	
(19,476)	 	 	 —	 	
Employee-related benefits 	 	 	 —	 	 	
71	 	 	
125	 	 	 —	 	 	
196	 	
Income and mining taxes 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
75	 	 	 —	 	 	
75	 	
Other current liabilities 	 	 	
67	 	 	
101	 	 	
317	 	 	 —	 	 	
485	 	
Current liabilities 	 	 	
4,649	 	 	
4,929	 	 	
11,356	 	 	
(19,476)	 	 	
1,458	 	
Debt 	 	 	
5,353	 	 	
6	 	 	
10	 	 	 —	 	 	
5,369	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
235	 	 	
1,586	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,821	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
86	 	 	
1,269	 	 	
(490)	 	 	
865	 	
Employee-related benefits 	 	 	 —	 	 	
287	 	 	
167	 	 	 —	 	 	
454	 	
Non-current intercompany payable	 	 	
81	 	 	 —	 	 	
2,297	 	 	
(2,378)	 	 	 —	 	
Other non-current liabilities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
35	 	 	
298	 	 	 —	 	 	
333	 	
Total liabilities 	 	 	
10,083	 	 	
5,578	 	 	
16,983	 	 	
(22,344)	 	 	
10,300	 	
Equity	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Newmont stockholders’ equity 	 	 	
11,349	 	 	
6,909	 	 	
9,139	 	 	
(16,048)	 	 	
11,349	 	
Noncontrolling interests 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
2,904	 	 	 —	 	 	
2,904	 	
Total equity	 	 	
11,349	 	 	
6,909	 	 	
12,043	 	 	
(16,048)	 	 	
14,253	 	
Total liabilities and equity	 	$	
21,432	 	$	
12,487	 	$	
29,026	 	$	
(38,392)	 	$	
24,553	 	

35

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)

 	 	At December 31, 2015	 	
 	 	(Issuer)	 	(Guarantor)	 	(Non-Guarantor)	 	 	 	Newmont	 	
 	 	Newmont	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Mining	 	
 	 	Mining	 	Newmont	 	Other	 	 	 	Corporation	 	
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet	    	Corporation	    	USA	    	Subsidiaries	    	Eliminations	    	Consolidated	 	
Assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents 	 	$	 —	 	$	
1,181	 	$	
1,601	 	$	 —	 	$	
2,782	 	
Trade receivables 	 	 	 —	 	 	
31	 	 	
229	 	 	 —	 	 	
260	 	
Other accounts receivables	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
185	 	 	 —	 	 	
185	 	
Intercompany receivable	 	 	
4,587	 	 	
6,212	 	 	
8,101	 	 	
(18,900)	 	 	 —	 	
Investments	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
19	 	 	 —	 	 	
19	 	
Inventories 	 	 	 —	 	 	
158	 	 	
552	 	 	 —	 	 	
710	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads 	 	 	 —	 	 	
201	 	 	
695	 	 	 —	 	 	
896	 	
Other current assets	 	 	 —	 	 	
53	 	 	
78	 	 	 —	 	 	
131	 	
Current assets 	 	 	
4,587	 	 	
7,836	 	 	
11,460	 	 	
(18,900)	 	 	
4,983	 	
Property, plant and mine development, net 	 	 	
26	 	 	
3,179	 	 	
11,136	 	 	
(38)	 	 	
14,303	 	
Investments 	 	 	 —	 	 	
15	 	 	
387	 	 	 —	 	 	
402	 	
Investments in subsidiaries 	 	 	
15,650	 	 	
3,886	 	 	
2,820	 	 	
(22,356)	 	 	 —	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads 	 	 	 —	 	 	
621	 	 	
2,379	 	 	 —	 	 	
3,000	 	
Deferred income tax assets 	 	 	
223	 	 	
757	 	 	
1,228	 	 	
(490)	 	 	
1,718	 	
Non-current intercompany receivable	 	 	
1,742	 	 	
434	 	 	
108	 	 	
(2,284)	 	 	 —	 	
Other non-current assets 	 	 	 —	 	 	
253	 	 	
477	 	 	 —	 	 	
730	 	
Total assets 	 	$	
22,228	 	$	
16,981	 	$	
29,995	 	$	
(44,068)	 	$	
25,136	 	
Liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Debt 	 	$	 —	 	$	
3	 	$	
146	 	$	 —	 	$	
149	 	
Accounts payable 	 	 	 —	 	 	
78	 	 	
318	 	 	 —	 	 	
396	 	
Intercompany payable	 	 	
4,888	 	 	
5,495	 	 	
8,517	 	 	
(18,900)	 	 	 —	 	
Employee-related benefits 	 	 	 —	 	 	
136	 	 	
157	 	 	 —	 	 	
293	 	
Income and mining taxes 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
38	 	 	 —	 	 	
38	 	
Other current liabilities 	 	 	
70	 	 	
133	 	 	
337	 	 	 —	 	 	
540	 	
Current liabilities 	 	 	
4,958	 	 	
5,845	 	 	
9,513	 	 	
(18,900)	 	 	
1,416	 	
Debt 	 	 	
5,839	 	 	
7	 	 	
195	 	 	 —	 	 	
6,041	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
231	 	 	
1,569	 	 	 —	 	 	
1,800	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
85	 	 	
1,245	 	 	
(490)	 	 	
840	 	
Employee-related benefits 	 	 	 —	 	 	
283	 	 	
154	 	 	 —	 	 	
437	 	
Non-current intercompany payable	 	 	
81	 	 	 —	 	 	
2,241	 	 	
(2,322)	 	 	 —	 	
Other non-current liabilities 	 	 	 —	 	 	
37	 	 	
273	 	 	 —	 	 	
310	 	
Total liabilities 	 	 	
10,878	 	 	
6,488	 	 	
15,190	 	 	
(21,712)	 	 	
10,844	 	
Equity	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Newmont stockholders’ equity 	 	 	
11,350	 	 	
10,493	 	 	
10,202	 	 	
(20,695)	 	 	
11,350	 	
Noncontrolling interests 	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
4,603	 	 	
(1,661)	 	 	
2,942	 	
Total equity	 	 	
11,350	 	 	
10,493	 	 	
14,805	 	 	
(22,356)	 	 	
14,292	 	
Total liabilities and equity	 	$	
22,228	 	$	
16,981	 	$	
29,995	 	$	
(44,068)	 	$	
25,136	 	

36

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NOTE 22    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
General
 
Estimated losses from contingencies are accrued by a charge to income when information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability could be incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal expenses associated with the contingency are expensed as incurred. If a loss contingency is not probable or reasonably estimable, disclosure of the contingency and estimated range of loss, if determinable, is made in the financial statements when it is at least reasonably possible that a material loss could be incurred.
 
Operating Segments
 
The Company’s operating segments are identified in Note 4. Except as noted in this paragraph, all of the Company’s commitments and contingencies specifically described herein are included in Corporate and Other. The Yanacocha matters relate to the South America reportable segment. The PTNNT matters relate to the Asia Pacific reportable segment. The Fronteer matters relate to the North America reportable segment.
 
Environmental Matters
 
The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with applicable laws and regulations in all material respects. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures.
 
Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $1,575 and $1,553, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently or recently producing mineral properties in accordance with asset retirement obligation guidance. The current portions of $36 and $37 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, are included in Other current liabilities .  
 
In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. The Company believes that the related environmental obligations associated with these sites are similar in nature with respect to the development of remediation plans, their risk profile and the compliance required to meet general environmental standards. Based upon the Company’s best estimate of its liability for these matters, $316 and $318 were accrued for such obligations at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. These amounts are included in Other current liabilities and Reclamation and remediation liabilities . Depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the liability for these matters could be as much as 43% greater or 1% lower than the amount accrued at March 31, 2016. The amounts accrued are reviewed periodically based upon facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes in estimates are recorded in Reclamation and remediation in the period estimates are revised.
 
Details about certain of the more significant matters are discussed below.

37

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
Newmont USA Limited - 100% Newmont Owned
 
Ross-Adams Mine Site. By letter dated June 5, 2007, the U.S. Forest Service notified Newmont that it had expended approximately $0.3 in response costs to address environmental conditions at the Ross-Adams mine in Prince of Wales, Alaska, and requested Newmont USA Limited pay those costs and perform an Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (“EE/CA”) to assess what future response activities might need to be completed at the site. Newmont agreed to perform the EE/CA, which has been provided to the U.S. Forest Service (“USFS”). During the first quarter of 2016, the USFS confirmed approval of the EE/CA, and Newmont issued written notice to the USFS certifying that all requirements of the Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (“ASAOC”) between the USFS and Newmont have been completed. The ASAOC will be final upon USFS concurrence with the notice of completion and Newmont payment of USFS response costs, which are anticipated to be received from the USFS in the second quarter of 2016. Any future liability associated with the Ross-Adams site would be subject to future negotiations with the USFS. In the first quarter of 2016, Newmont continued follow-up discussions with another potential responsible party to discuss possible allocation of future costs for implementing the remedy. No assurances can be made at this time with respect to the outcome of such negotiations and Newmont cannot predict the likelihood of additional expenditures related to this matter.
 
Dawn Mining Company LLC (“Dawn”) - 51% Newmont Owned
 
Midnite Mine Site and Mill Site . Dawn previously leased an open pit uranium mine, currently inactive, on the Spokane Indian Reservation in the State of Washington. The mine site is subject to regulation by agencies of the U.S. Department of Interior (the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Land Management), as well as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”).
 
As per the Consent Decree approved by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington on January 17, 2012,  the following actions were required of Newmont, Dawn, the Department of the Interior and the EPA: 1) Newmont and Dawn would design, construct and implement the cleanup plan selected by the EPA in 2006 for the Midnite Mine site; 2) Newmont and Dawn would reimburse the EPA for its costs associated with overseeing the work; 3) the Department of the Interior would contribute a lump sum amount toward past EPA costs and future costs related to the cleanup of the Midnite Mine site; 4) Newmont and Dawn would be responsible for all other EPA oversight costs and Midnite Mine site cleanup costs and 5) Newmont would post a surety bond for work at the site.
 
During 2012, the Department of Interior contributed its share of past EPA costs and future costs related to the cleanup of the Midnite Mine site in a lump sum payment of $42, which Newmont classified as restricted cash with interest on the consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented. Additionally in 2012, Newmont initiated the remedial design process and subsequently submitted interim process update reports at the 30% design, 60% design and 90% design level of completion, which were approved by the EPA in July 2012, April 2014 and April 2015, respectively. Upon approval by the EPA of the 90% design coupled with the resolution of uncertainties regarding site access and material use, the expected remediation design was reasonably certain and Newmont commissioned an independent cost estimate of the overall project costs based on the 90% design. The reclamation liability for the Midnite Mine site and Mill site is approximately $220 at March 31, 2016.
 
Other Legal Matters
 
Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. - 51.35% Newmont Owned
 
Choropampa . In June 2000, a transport contractor of Yanacocha spilled approximately 151 kilograms of elemental mercury near the town of Choropampa, Peru, which is located 53 miles (85 kilometers) southwest of the Yanacocha mine. Elemental mercury is not used in Yanacocha’s operations but is a by-product of gold mining and was sold to a

38

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
Lima firm for use in medical instruments and industrial applications. A comprehensive health and environmental remediation program was undertaken by Yanacocha in response to the incident. In August 2000, Yanacocha paid under protest a fine of 1,740,000 Peruvian soles (approximately $0.5) to the Peruvian government. Yanacocha has entered into settlement agreements with a number of individuals impacted by the incident. As compensation for the disruption and inconvenience caused by the incident, Yanacocha entered into agreements with and provided a variety of public works in the three communities impacted by this incident. Yanacocha cannot predict the likelihood of additional expenditures related to this matter.
 
Additional lawsuits relating to the Choropampa incident were filed against Yanacocha in the local courts of Cajamarca, Peru, in May 2002 by over 900 Peruvian citizens. A significant number of the plaintiffs in these lawsuits entered into settlement agreements with Yanacocha prior to filing such claims. In April 2008, the Peruvian Supreme Court upheld the validity of these settlement agreements, which the Company expects to result in the dismissal of all claims brought by previously settled plaintiffs. Yanacocha has also entered into settlement agreements with approximately 350 additional plaintiffs. The claims asserted by approximately 200 plaintiffs remain. In 2011, Yanacocha was served with 23 complaints alleging grounds to nullify the settlements entered into between Yanacocha and the plaintiffs. Yanacocha has answered the complaints and the court has dismissed several of the matters and the plaintiffs have filed appeals. All appeals were referred to the Civil Court of Cajamarca, which affirmed the decisions of the lower court judge. The plaintiffs have filed appeals of such orders before the Supreme Court. Some of these appeals were dismissed by the Supreme Court in favor of Yanacocha, and others are pending resolution. Yanacocha will continue to vigorously defend its position. Neither the Company nor Yanacocha can reasonably estimate the ultimate loss relating to such claims.
 
Administrative Actions . The Peruvian government agency responsible for environmental evaluation and inspection, Organismo Evaluacion y Fiscalizacion Ambiental (“OEFA”), conducts periodic reviews of the Yanacocha site. In 2011, 2012, and 2013, and the first quarter of 2015, OEFA issued notices of alleged violations of OEFA standards to Yanacocha and Conga relating to past inspections. Total fines for all outstanding OEFA alleged violations remain dependent upon the number of units associated with the alleged violations. In the first quarter of 2015, the water authority of Cajamarca issued notices of alleged regulatory violations. The alleged OEFA violations currently range from zero to 80,112 units and the water authority alleged violations range from zero to 20,000 units, with each unit having a potential fine equivalent to approximately $.00116 ($0 to $116). Yanacocha and Conga are responding to all notices of alleged violations, but cannot reasonably predict the outcome of the agency allegations.
 
Conga Project Constitutional Claim . On October 18, 2012, Marco Antonio Arana Zegarra filed a constitutional claim against the Ministry of Energy and Mines and Yanacocha requesting the Court to order the suspension of Conga project as well as to declare not applicable the October 27, 2010, directorial resolution approving the Conga project Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”). On October 23, 2012, a Cajamarca judge dismissed the claims based on formal grounds finding that: 1) plaintiffs had not exhausted previous administrative proceedings; 2) the directorial resolution approving the Conga EIA is valid, and was not challenged when issued in the administrative proceedings; 3) there was inadequate evidence to conclude that the Conga project is a threat to the constitutional right of living in an adequate environment and 4) the directorial resolution approving the Conga project EIA does not guarantee that the Conga project will proceed, so there was no imminent threat to be addressed by the Court. The plaintiffs appealed the dismissal of the case. The Civil Court of the Superior Court of Cajamarca confirmed the above mentioned resolution and the plaintiff presented an appeal. On March 13, 2015, the Constitutional Court published its ruling stating that the case should be sent back to the first court with an order to formally admit the case and start the judicial process in order to review the claim and the proofs presented by the plaintiff. Yanacocha has answered the claim. Neither the Company nor Yanacocha can reasonably predict the outcome of this litigation.
 
Yanacocha Tax Dispute.  In 2000, Yanacocha paid Buenaventura and Minas Conga S.R.L. a total of $29 to assume their respective contractual positions in mining concession agreements with Chaupiloma Dos de Cajamarca S.M.R.L. The

39

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
contractual rights allowed Yanacocha the opportunity to conduct exploration on the concessions, but not a purchase of the concessions. The tax authority alleges that the payments to Buenaventura and Minas Conga S.R.L. were acquisitions of mining concessions requiring the amortization of the amounts under the Peru Mining Law over the life of the mine. Yanacocha expensed the amounts at issue in the initial year since the payments were not for the acquisition of a concession but rather these expenses represent the payment of an intangible and therefore, amortizable in a single year or proportionally for up to ten years according to Income Tax Law. In 2010, the tax court in Peru ruled in favor of Yanacocha and the tax authority appealed the issue to the judiciary. The first appellate court confirmed the ruling of the tax court in favor of Yanacocha. However, in November, 2015, a Superior Court in Peru made an appellate decision overturning the two prior findings in favor of Yanacocha. Yanacocha has appealed the Superior Court ruling to the Peru Supreme Court. The potential liability in this matter is in the form of fines and interest in an amount up to $70. While the Company has assessed that the likelihood of a ruling against Yanacocha in the Supreme Court as remote, it is not possible to fully predict the outcome of this litigation.
 
PT Newmont Nusa Tenggara – 31.5% Newmont Owned
 
Under the Batu Hijau Contract of Work, beginning in 2006 and continuing through 2010, a portion of PTNNT’s shares were required to be offered for sale, first, to the Indonesian government or, second, to Indonesian nationals, equal to the difference between the following percentages and the percentage of shares already owned by the Indonesian government or Indonesian nationals (if such number is positive): 23% by March 31, 2006; 30% by March 31, 2007; 37% by March 31, 2008; 44% by March 31, 2009; and 51% by March 31, 2010. As PT Pukuafu Indah, an Indonesian national, owned a 20% interest in PTNNT at all relevant times, in 2006, a 3% interest was required to be offered for sale and, in each of 2007 through 2010, an additional 7% interest was required to be offered (for an aggregate 31% interest). The price at which such interests were offered for sale to the Indonesian parties was the fair market value of such interest considering PTNNT as a going concern, as agreed with the Indonesian government. Following certain disputes and an arbitration with the Indonesian government, in November and December 2009, sale agreements were concluded pursuant to which the 2006, 2007 and 2008 shares were sold to PT Multi Daerah Bersaing (“PTMDB”), the nominee of the local governments, and the 2009 shares were sold to PTMDB in February 2010, resulting in PTMDB owning a 24% interest in PTNNT.
 
On December 17, 2010, the Ministry of Energy & Mineral Resources, acting on behalf of the Indonesian government, accepted the offer to acquire the final 7% interest in PTNNT. Subsequently, the Indonesian government designated Pusat Investasi Pemerintah (“PIP”), an agency of the Ministry of Finance, as the entity that will buy the final stake. On May 6, 2011, PIP and the foreign shareholders entered into a definitive agreement for the sale and purchase of the final 7% divestiture stake, subject to receipt of approvals from certain Indonesian government ministries. Subsequent to signing the agreement, a disagreement arose between the Ministry of Finance and the Indonesian parliament in regard to whether parliamentary approval was needed to allow PIP to make the share purchase. In July 2012, the Constitutional Court ruled that parliament approval is required for PIP to use state funds to purchase the shares, which approval was never obtained. PIP and the foreign shareholders have not further extended the period in the definitive agreement for satisfaction of the conditions. Further disputes may arise in regard to the divestiture of the 2010 shares.
 
NWG Investments Inc. v. Fronteer Gold Inc.
 
In April 2011, Newmont acquired Fronteer Gold Inc. (“Fronteer”).
 
Fronteer acquired NewWest Gold Corporation (“NewWest Gold”) in September 2007. At the time of that acquisition, NWG Investments Inc. (“NWG”) owned approximately 86% of NewWest Gold and an individual named Jacob Safra owned or controlled 100% of NWG. Prior to its acquisition of NewWest Gold, Fronteer entered into a June 2007 lock-up agreement with NWG providing that, among other things, NWG would support Fronteer’s acquisition of

40

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
NewWest Gold. At that time, Fronteer owned approximately 47% of Aurora Energy Resources Inc. (“Aurora”), which, among other things, had a uranium exploration project in Labrador, Canada.
 
NWG contends that, during the negotiations leading up to the lock-up agreement, Fronteer represented to NWG, among other things, that Aurora would commence uranium mining in Labrador by 2013, that this was a firm date, that Aurora faced no current environmental issues in Labrador and that Aurora’s competitors faced delays in commencing uranium mining. NWG further contends that it entered into the lock-up agreement and agreed to support Fronteer’s acquisition of NewWest Gold in reliance upon these purported representations. On October 11, 2007, less than three weeks after the Fronteer-NewWest Gold transaction closed, a member of the Nunatsiavut Assembly introduced a motion calling for the adoption of a moratorium on uranium mining in Labrador. On April 8, 2008, the Nunatsiavut Assembly adopted a three-year moratorium on uranium mining in Labrador. NWG contends that Fronteer was aware during the negotiations of the NWG/Fronteer lock-up agreement that the Nunatsiavut Assembly planned on adopting this moratorium and that its adoption would preclude Aurora from commencing uranium mining by 2013, but Fronteer nonetheless fraudulently induced NWG to enter into the lock-up agreement.
 
On September 24, 2012, NWG served a summons and complaint on the Company, and then amended the complaint to add Newmont Canada Holdings ULC as a defendant. The complaint also named Fronteer Gold Inc. and Mark O’Dea as defendants. The complaint sought rescission of the merger between Fronteer and NewWest Gold and $750 in damages. In August 2013 the Supreme Court of New York, New York County issued an order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss on forum non conveniens. Subsequently, NWG filed a notice of appeal of the decision and then a notice of dismissal of the appeal on March 24, 2014.
 
On February 26, 2014, NWG filed a lawsuit in Ontario Superior Court of Justice against Fronteer Gold Inc., Newmont Mining Corporation, Newmont Canada Holdings ULC, Newmont FH B.V. and Mark O’Dea. The Ontario complaint is based upon substantially the same allegations contained in the New York lawsuit with claims for fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation. NWG seeks disgorgement of profits since the close of the NWG deal on September 24, 2007 and damages in the amount of CAD $1.2 billion. Newmont, along with other defendants, served the plaintiff with its statement of defense on October 17, 2014. Newmont intends to vigorously defend this matter, but cannot reasonably predict the outcome.
 
Investigations
 
We occasionally identify or are apprised of information or allegations that certain employees, affiliates, agents or associated persons may have engaged in unlawful conduct for which we might be held responsible. We are conducting an investigation, with the assistance of outside counsel, relating to certain business activities of the Company and its affiliates and contractors in countries outside the United States. The investigation includes a review of compliance with the requirements of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other applicable laws and regulations. The Company is working with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice with respect to the investigation. In March 2016, the Company entered into a one-year agreement with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission tolling the statute of limitations relating to the investigation, and recently entered into a similar agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice. As of the filing of these financial statements, we cannot predict the outcome of these matters. Accordingly, no provision with respect to these matters has been made in our consolidated financial statements. See also Item 1A of the Company’s most recent Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 17, 2016 under the heading “Our business is subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and other extraterritorial and domestic anti-bribery laws, a breach or violation of which could lead to civil and criminal fines and penalties, loss of licenses or permits and other collateral consequences and reputational harm.”

41

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
 
Other Commitments and Contingencies
 
The Company has minimum royalty obligations on one of its producing mines in Nevada for the life of the mine. Amounts paid as a minimum royalty (where production royalties are less than the minimum obligation) in any year are recoverable in future years when the minimum royalty obligation is exceeded. Although the minimum royalty requirement may not be met in a particular year, the Company expects that over the mine life, gold production will be sufficient to meet the minimum royalty requirements. Average annual minimum royalty payments payable, net of recoverable amounts, are $28 in 2016, $32 in 2017 through 2020 and $19 thereafter.
 
On June 25, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of the remaining 33.33% interest in Boddington from AngloGold Ashanti Australia Limited (“AngloGold”). Consideration for the acquisition consisted of $982 and a contingent royalty capped at $100, equal to 50% of the average realized operating margin (Revenue less Costs applicable to sales on a by-product basis), if any, exceeding $600 per ounce, payable quarterly beginning in the second quarter of 2010 on one-third of gold sales from Boddington. At the acquisition date, the Company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration at $62. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the estimated fair value of the unpaid contingent consideration was approximately $10. Changes to the estimated fair value resulting from periodic revaluations are recorded to Other expense, net . This contingent royalty is capped at $100 in aggregate payments. The Company has made no payments during 2016 and 2015. The range of remaining undiscounted amounts the Company could pay is between $0 and $28.
 
Discontinued operations include a retained royalty obligation (“Holt”) to Holloway Mining Company. Holloway Mining Company, which owned the Holt-McDermott property, was sold to St. Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“St. Andrew”) in 2006. In January 2016, St. Andrew was acquired by Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. In 2009, the Superior Court issued a decision finding Newmont Canada Corporation (“Newmont Canada”) liable for a sliding scale royalty on production from the Holt property, which Newmont Canada appealed. In May 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the Superior Court ruling finding Newmont liable for the sliding scale royalty, which equals 0.013% of net smelter returns multiplied by the quarterly average gold price, minus a 0.013% of net smelter returns. There is no cap on the sliding scale royalty and it will increase or decrease with changes in gold price, discount rate, and gold production scenarios. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the estimated fair value of the Holt sliding scale royalty was $164 and $129, respectively. Changes to the estimated fair value resulting from periodic revaluations are recorded to Income (loss) from discontinued operations . During the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, the Company recorded a loss of $26 (net of a tax benefit of $11) and a gain of $8 (net of a tax expense of $4), respectively. During the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, the Company paid $2 and $3, respectively, related to the royalty.
 
As part of its ongoing business and operations, the Company and its affiliates are required to provide surety bonds, bank letters of credit and bank guarantees as financial support for various purposes, including environmental reclamation, exploration permitting, workers compensation programs and other general corporate purposes. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there were $2,153 and $2,060, respectively, of outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and bank guarantees. The surety bonds, letters of credit and bank guarantees reflect fair value as a condition of their underlying purpose and are subject to fees competitively determined in the market place. The obligations associated with these instruments are generally related to performance requirements that the Company addresses through its ongoing operations. As the specific requirements are met, the beneficiary of the associated instrument cancels and/or returns the instrument to the issuing entity. Certain of these instruments are associated with operating sites with long-lived assets and will remain outstanding until closure. Generally, bonding requirements associated with environmental regulation are becoming more restrictive. However, the Company believes it is in compliance with all applicable bonding obligations and will be able to satisfy future bonding requirements through existing or alternative means, as they arise.

42

Table of Contents
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited  )
(dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
Newmont is from time to time involved in various legal proceedings related to its business. Except in the above described proceedings, management does not believe that adverse decisions in any pending or threatened proceeding or that amounts that may be required to be paid by reason thereof will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

43

Table of Contents
ITEM 2.       MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (dollars in millions, except per share, per ounce and per pound amounts)
 
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont,” the “Company,” “our” and “we”). We use certain non-GAAP financial measures in our MD&A. For a detailed description of each of the non-GAAP measures used in this MD&A, please see the discussion under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 59 . References to “A$” refers to Australian currency.
 
This item should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in this quarterly report. Additionally, the following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements included in Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016.
 
Overview   
 
Newmont is one of the world’s largest gold producers and is the only gold company included in the S&P 500 Index and Fortune 500. We have been included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index-World for nine consecutive years and have adopted the World Gold Council’s Conflict-Free Gold Policy. We are also engaged in the exploration for and acquisition of gold and copper properties. We have significant operations and/or assets in the United States, Australia, Peru, Indonesia, Ghana and Suriname.
 
Our vision is to be recognized and respected for exceptional economic, environmental and social performance.
 
We continue to position the business to capture benefits of economic recovery and demand growth in the current volatile commodity market environment. Our team has spent considerable time optimizing our project portfolio and we continue to move forward with developing projects that generate value. We are focused on providing sustainable efficiency, productivity and cost improvements over the next three years and expect to deliver significant cost and cash savings improvement initiatives. One of the programs we launched in 2013 and continue to progress in 2016 to achieve these improvements is the Full Potential program (“Full Potential”). Full Potential is designed to leverage our industry experience and discipline to accelerate the delivery of business improvement opportunities across our operations and support areas, resulting in improved levels of operating cash flow .
 
First quarter of 2016 highlights are included below and discussed further in Results of Consolidated Operations .  
 
Operating highlights
 
	·		Sales of $2,032 for the first quarter of 2016;	
 
	·		Average realized gold and copper prices of $1,194 per ounce and $2.02 per pound, respectively, for the first quarter of 2016;	
 
	·		Consolidated gold production of 1,416,000 ounces (1,229,000 attributable ounces) for the first quarter of 2016, at Costs applicable to sales per ounce of $638 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 59 );	
 
	·		Consolidated copper production of 141 million pounds (83 million attributable pounds) for the first quarter of 2016, at Costs applicable to sales per pound of $1.05 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 59 );	
 
	·		Gold operating margin of $556 per ounce for the first quarter of 2016 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 59 );	

44

Table of Contents

	·		Copper operating margin of $0.97 per pound for the first quarter of 2016 (see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 59 ).	
 
Our global project pipeline
 
We manage our wider project portfolio to maintain flexibility to address the development risks associated with our projects including permitting, local community and government support, engineering and procurement availability, technical issues, escalating costs and other associated risks that could adversely impact the timing and costs of certain opportunities.
 
Projects included in our global pipeline comprise an important part of the Company’s growth strategy and reflect opportunities throughout the development cycle. The most advanced projects, including early stage development and projects in or near the Execution phase, are described below. The exploration, construction and execution of these projects may require significant funding to complete.  
 
Merian, Suriname . On July 29, 2014, the Board of Directors of Newmont approved full funding for the Merian project in Suriname and construction began in August 2014. Following the project approval by Newmont, the Government of Suriname granted the Right of Exploitation on August 22, 2014. The Government of Suriname opted for a 25% ownership in the Merian project and made their earn-in payments. The project allows Newmont to pursue a new district with upside potential and the opportunity to grow and extend the operating life of the South American region. We expect Merian to reach commercial production by the fourth quarter of 2016. Upon reaching commercial production, we expect average estimated gold production (on a 100% basis) of 400,000 to 500,000 ounces per year for the first five years. Total capital spend on the project is expected to range from $575 to $625 on an attributable basis. As of March 31, 2016, total capital costs were $490, of which $61 related to the first quarter of 2016 on an attributable basis. At December 31, 2015, we reported 110.6 million tons of probable reserves, grading 0.035 ounces per ton for 3.8 million ounces of gold reserves on an attributable basis at Merian.
 
Long Canyon, Nevada .   The Board of Directors approved full funding for the first phase of the Long Canyon project in the second quarter of 2015. The Environmental Impact Statement Record of Decision was issued by the Bureau of Land Management on April 7, 2015. The project is now under construction and is expected to achieve commercial production in the first half of 2017. This first phase of development consists of an open pit mine and heap leach operation with production between 100,000 and 150,000 ounces per year over an eight year mine life. Total capital costs of the project are estimated between $250 and $300. As of March 31, 2016, total capital costs were $171, of which $36 related to the first quarter of 2016. We are currently assessing mining and processing options and completing a three-year infill drilling program to inform our approach to Phase 2.   At December 31, 2015, we reported 18 million tons of probable reserves, grading 0.067 ounce per ton for 1.2 million ounces of gold reserves at Long Canyon.
 
Cripple Creek & Victor (“CC&V”) Expansion, Colorado. An expansion project at CC&V, which will extend CC&V’s estimated mine life to at least 2026, includes the construction of a new leach pad, mill and recovery plant. The mill was mechanically completed in the first quarter of 2015. Total capital costs for Newmont to complete the CC&V expansion project are estimated to be approximately $200. As of March 31, 2016, total capital costs for Newmont were $74, of which $21 related to the first quarter of 2016. Mill commissioning and ramp up of production will continue through 2016. The new leach pad and half of the recovery plant reached commercial production in the first quarter of 2016.
 
Tanami Expansion, Australia.  The Board of Directors approved full funding of the Tanami Expansion project on October 28, 2015. The goal of the Tanami Expansion project is to increase production and lower all-in sustaining costs per ounce at the existing Tanami operation. Incremental improvements are driven by bringing ounces forward, mining additional ounces at depth and leveraging the fixed costs of the mine and processing facilities. The scope for this project includes a ventilation upgrade, additional mining equipment, additional mine access and increasing process plant capacity and recovery. Total capital costs for Newmont to complete the Tanami expansion project are estimated to be between $100 and $120, which will enable Tanami production of between 425,000 and 475,000 gold ounces for the first five years following the expansion at lower costs and an increased mine life by three years. As of March 31, 2016, total capital costs were $29, of which $9 related to the first quarter of 2016.

45

Table of Contents
Ahafo Mill Expansion, Ghana . We continue to evaluate development alternatives for this project, currently in the feasibility stage. The project would increase profitable production by 100,000 to 125,000 ounces (first five year average) while lowering costs and off-setting the impacts of lower grades and harder ore. If approved in late 2016, the additional production would be expected to begin in 2018.
 
Subika Underground, Ghana . Subika Underground is in the feasibility stage of development as work continues to optimize the mine plan and reduce costs. The project would increase profitable production by 150,000 to 200,000 ounces of gold per year and an investment decision is expected in late 2016.
 
Selected Financial and Operating Results   

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Sales	 	$	
2,032	 	$	
1,972	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations 	 	$	
161	 	$	
221	 	
Net income (loss) 	 	$	
135	 	$	
229	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
52	 	$	
183	 	
Per common share, basic:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
0.15	 	$	
0.35	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
0.10	 	$	
0.37	 	
Adjusted net income (loss) (1)	 	$	
182	 	$	
229	 	
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, basic (1)	 	$	
0.34	 	$	
0.46	 	
Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (1)	 	$	
891	 	$	
797	 	
Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (1)	 	$	
803	 	$	
815	 	
Free Cash Flow (1)	 	$	
227	 	$	
344	 	
Consolidated gold ounces (thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Produced	 	 	
1,416	 	 	
1,362	 	
Sold (2)	 	 	
1,421	 	 	
1,367	 	
Consolidated copper pounds (millions) 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Produced	 	 	
141	 	 	
139	 	
Sold	 	 	
167	 	 	
139	 	
Average realized price:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold (per ounce) 	 	$	
1,194	 	$	
1,203	 	
Copper (per pound) 	 	$	
2.02	 	$	
2.34	 	
Consolidated costs applicable to sales: (1)(3)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold (per ounce) 	 	$	
638	 	$	
614	 	
Copper (per pound) 	 	$	
1.05	 	$	
1.35	 	
Operating margin: (1)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold (per ounce) 	 	$	
556	 	$	
589	 	
Copper (per pound) 	 	$	
0.97	 	$	
0.99	 	
All-in sustaining costs: (1)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold (per ounce) 	 	$	
828	 	$	
849	 	
Copper (per pound) 	 	$	
1.33	 	$	
1.73	 	

	(1)		See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” beginning on page 59 .  	
	(2)		Excludes development ounces.	
	(3)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.	
 
Consolidated Financial Results   
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders for the first quarter of 2016 was $52 ($0.10 per share) compared to income of $183 ($0.37 per share) for the first quarter of 2015. Results for the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 were impacted by higher income and mining taxes, higher operating costs and lower realized gold and copper prices, partially offset by higher gold and copper sales volumes, lower copper unit costs and the sale of the Company’s investment in Regis Resources Ltd.

46

Table of Contents
Gold sales increased 3% in the first quarter of 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 due to higher sales volumes at existing operations and the addition of CC&V, partially offset by lower average realized prices and the sale of Waihi. The following analysis summarizes consolidated gold sales:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	 	2016	 	2015	 	
Consolidated gold sales:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross before provisional pricing	    	$	
1,685	    	$	
1,664	 	
Provisional pricing mark-to-market	 	 	
30	 	 	
(1)	 	
Gross after provisional pricing	 	 	
1,715	 	 	
1,663	 	
Treatment and refining charges	 	 	
(21)	 	 	
(18)	 	
Net	 	$	
1,694	 	$	
1,645	 	
Consolidated gold ounces sold (thousands):	 	 	
1,421	 	 	
1,367	 	
Average realized gold price (per ounce):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross before provisional pricing	 	$	
1,187	 	$	
1,217	 	
Provisional pricing mark-to-market	 	 	
21	 	 	
(1)	 	
Gross after provisional pricing	 	 	
1,208	 	 	
1,216	 	
Treatment and refining charges	 	 	
(14)	 	 	
(13)	 	
Net	 	$	
1,194	 	$	
1,203	 	
 
The change in consolidated gold sales is due to:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	  	2016 vs. 2015	 	
Change in consolidated ounces sold	    	$	
64	 	
Change in average realized gold price	 	 	
(12)	 	
Change in treatment and refining charges	 	 	
(3)	 	
 	 	$	
49	 	
 
Copper sales increased 3% in the first quarter of 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 due to higher sales volumes as a result of higher production resulting from higher ore grade mined at Batu Hijau, partially offset by lower average realized prices. The following analysis summarizes consolidated copper sales:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	 	2016	 	2015	 	
Consolidated copper sales:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross before provisional pricing	    	$	
356	    	$	
370	 	
Provisional pricing mark-to-market	 	 	
14	 	 	
(16)	 	
Gross after provisional pricing	 	 	
370	 	 	
354	 	
Treatment and refining charges	 	 	
(32)	 	 	
(27)	 	
Net	 	$	
338	 	$	
327	 	
Consolidated copper pounds sold (millions):	 	 	
167	 	 	
139	 	
Average realized copper price (per pound):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross before provisional pricing	 	$	
2.13	 	$	
2.66	 	
Provisional pricing mark-to-market	 	 	
0.08	 	 	
(0.12)	 	
Gross after provisional pricing	 	 	
2.21	 	 	
2.54	 	
Treatment and refining charges	 	 	
(0.19)	 	 	
(0.20)	 	
Net	 	$	
2.02	 	$	
2.34	 	

47

Table of Contents
The change in consolidated copper sales is due to:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	 	2016 vs. 2015	 	
Change in consolidated pounds sold	    	$	
71	 	
Change in average realized copper price	 	 	
(55)	 	
Change in treatment and refining charges	 	 	
(5)	 	
 	 	$	
11	 	
 
The following is a summary of consolidated gold and copper sales, net:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	 	2016	 	2015	 	
Gold 	    	 	 	    	 	 	 	
North America: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
246	 	$	
276	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
64	 	 	
61	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
159	 	 	
149	 	
CC&V (1)	 	 	
65	 	 	 —	 	
 	 	 	
534	 	 	
486	 	
South America:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Yanacocha	 	 	
211	 	 	
301	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asia Pacific:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	 	
204	 	 	
239	 	
Tanami	 	 	
120	 	 	
120	 	
Waihi (2)	 	 	 —	 	 	
50	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
106	 	 	
74	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
283	 	 	
114	 	
 	 	 	
713	 	 	
597	 	
Africa: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ahafo	 	 	
101	 	 	
121	 	
Akyem	 	 	
135	 	 	
140	 	
 	 	 	
236	 	 	
261	 	
 	 	 	
1,694	 	 	
1,645	 	
Copper 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
North America:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
21	 	 	
34	 	
Asia Pacific:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	 	
30	 	 	
47	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
287	 	 	
246	 	
 	 	 	
317	 	 	
293	 	
 	 	 	
338	 	 	
327	 	
 	 	$	
2,032	 	$	
1,972	 	

	(1)		On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired the CC&V gold mining business.	
	(2)		On October 29, 2015, the Company sold the Waihi mine.	

48

Table of Contents
The following is a summary of Costs applicable to sales and Depreciation and amortization :  

 	 	Costs Applicable	 	Depreciation and	 	
 	 	to Sales	 	Amortization	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Gold	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
North America: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
189	 	$	
178	 	$	
49	 	$	
45	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
49	 	 	
41	 	 	
15	 	 	
10	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
60	 	 	
59	 	 	
13	 	 	
13	 	
CC&V (1)	 	 	
33	 	 	 —	 	 	
18	 	 	 —	 	
 	 	 	
331	 	 	
278	 	 	
95	 	 	
68	 	
South America: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Yanacocha	 	 	
128	 	 	
115	 	 	
69	 	 	
71	 	
Merian	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	
 	 	 	
128	 	 	
115	 	 	
70	 	 	
71	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asia Pacific:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	 	
111	 	 	
157	 	 	
23	 	 	
30	 	
Tanami	 	 	
59	 	 	
58	 	 	
19	 	 	
19	 	
Waihi (2)	 	 	 —	 	 	
19	 	 	 —	 	 	
5	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
65	 	 	
60	 	 	
5	 	 	
5	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
100	 	 	
51	 	 	
20	 	 	
9	 	
 	 	 	
335	 	 	
345	 	 	
67	 	 	
68	 	
Africa: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ahafo	 	 	
57	 	 	
56	 	 	
15	 	 	
15	 	
Akyem	 	 	
55	 	 	
46	 	 	
29	 	 	
22	 	
 	 	 	
112	 	 	
102	 	 	
44	 	 	
37	 	
 	 	 	
906	 	 	
840	 	 	
276	 	 	
244	 	
Copper	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
North America:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
22	 	 	
25	 	 	
5	 	 	
6	 	
Asia Pacific:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	 	
23	 	 	
39	 	 	
5	 	 	
7	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
130	 	 	
123	 	 	
26	 	 	
21	 	
 	 	 	
153	 	 	
162	 	 	
31	 	 	
28	 	
 	 	 	
175	 	 	
187	 	 	
36	 	 	
34	 	
Other	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Corporate and other	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
10	 	 	
11	 	
 	 	$	
1,081	 	$	
1,027	 	$	
322	 	$	
289	 	

	(1)		On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired the CC&V gold mining business.	
	(2)		On October 29, 2015, the Company sold the Waihi mine.	
 
Costs applicable to sales increased $54 in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to higher sales volumes and the addition of CC&V, partially offset by continuous improvement projects, a favorable Australian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate, higher gold production and lower stockpile inventory adjustments .   Costs applicable to sales for gold increased in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to higher sales volumes primarily at Batu Hijau, higher co-product allocation of costs to gold due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages, and the addition of CC&V, partially offset by a favorable Australian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate, higher gold production, lower stockpile inventory adjustments and the sale of Waihi. Costs applicable to sales for copper decreased in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to lower fuel prices, a favorable Australian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate , a lower co-product allocation of costs to copper due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages and higher production. For a complete discussion regarding variations in operations, see Results of Consolidated Operations .

49

Table of Contents
The Company also reclassified regional administrative costs of $14 from Other expense, net to General and administrative and community development costs of $8 from Other expense, net to Costs applicable to sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2015.
 
Depreciation and amortization for gold increased $32   in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to   higher sales volumes, higher leach pad inventory adjustments and from the addition of CC&V, partially offset by lower stockpile inventory adjustments. Depreciation and amortization for copper increased $2   in first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to higher sales volumes .
 
Other income, net increased by $87 in the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 primarily due to a gain of $103 on the sale of the Company’s investment in Regis Resources Ltd. in the current year and an impairment charge on marketable securities recognized in the first quarter of 2015. This was partially offset by foreign currency exchange losses in the first quarter of 2016 and a gain on the sale of Hemlo mineral rights recognized in the first quarter of 2015.
 
The Company’s Income and mining tax expense (benefit) consisted of:  

 	 	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	 	 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	Variance	 	 	
Income (loss) before income and mining tax and other items	 	 	 	$	
490	 	 	 	$	
423	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Tax at statutory rate	 	
35	%  	$	
172	 	
35	%  	$	
148	 	 	 	 	
Reconciling items:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Percentage depletion 	 	
(9)	%	 	
(42)	 	
(3)	%	 	
(15)	 	
(6)	%	 	
Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets	 	
39	%	 	
194	 	
10	%	 	
44	 	
29	%	 	
Mining and other taxes	 	
5	%	 	
23	 	
2	%	 	
8	 	
3	%	 	
Tax impact on sale of assets	 	
(7)	%	 	
(35)	 	 —	%	 	 —	 	
(7)	%	 	
Effect of foreign earnings, net of credits	 	
2	%	 	
10	 	
1	%	 	
3	 	
1	%	 	
Other 	 	
1	%	 	
2	 	
1	%	 	
5	 	
0	%	 	
Income and mining tax expense (benefit)	 	
66	%	$	
324	 	
46	%	$	
193	 	
20	%	 	
 
During the first quarter of 2016, income and mining tax expense was $324, resulting in an effective tax rate of 66%. Income and mining tax expense during the first quarter of 2015 was $193 for an effective tax rate of 46%. The Company’s effective tax rate is driven by a number of factors as illustrated in the table above. The benefit for percentage depletion increased in 2016 due to the jurisdictional mix of income earned by the Company. This difference in the jurisdictional mix of income also resulted in higher 2016 mining taxes. In 2016, the Company increased its valuation allowance for foreign tax credits generated by a restructuring implemented for tax planning purposes. Finally, no tax expense was recognized on the on the sale of the Company’s interest in Regis Resources as this sale resulted in a tax loss.
 
A valuation allowance is provided for those deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that the related benefits will not be realized. In determining the amount of the valuation allowance, each quarter the Company considers future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimated future taxable income, taxable income in prior carryback year(s), as well as feasible tax planning strategies in each jurisdiction to determine if the deferred tax assets are realizable. If it is determined we will not realize all or a portion of its deferred tax assets, we will place or increase a valuation allowance. Conversely, if we determine that we will ultimately be able to realize all or a portion of the related benefits for which a valuation allowance has been provided, all or a portion of the related valuation allowance will be reduced. There are a number of risk factors that could impact the Company’s ability to realize the deferred tax assets. See Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
There are a number of factors that can potentially impact the Company’s effective tax, including the geographic distribution of income, the non-recognition of tax assets, percentage depletion, changes in tax laws, and the impact of specific transactions and assessments. For a complete discussion of the factors that influence our effective tax rate, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Consolidated Financial Condition and Results of Operations for the year

50

Table of Contents
ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 on Form 10-K.
 
Due to the factors discussed above and the sensitivity of the Company’s income tax expense and effective tax rate to these factors, it is expected that the effective tax rate will fluctuate, sometimes significantly, in future periods.
 
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in the first quarter of 2016 was income of $83 compared to income of $46 in the same period of 2015. The increase in income from noncontrolling interests is a result of increased earnings at Batu Hijau in the current year.
 
Income (loss) from discontinued operations includes a retained royalty obligation (“Holt”) from Holloway Mining Company. Holloway Mining Company, which owned the Holt-McDermott property, was sold to St. Andrew Goldfields Ltd. (“St. Andrew”) in 2006. In January 2016, St. Andrew was acquired by Kirkland Lake Gold Inc. The Company records adjustments based on short and long-term prices, discount rate assumptions and resource estimates published by the operator. During the first quarter of 2016, the Company recorded a loss of $26, net of tax benefit of $11. During the first quarter of 2015, the Company recorded a gain of $8, net of tax expense of $4. Due to the nature of the sliding scale royalty calculation, changes in expected production, discount rates and gold price have a significant impact on the fair value of the liability.
 
Results of Consolidated Operations   

 	 	Gold or Copper	 	Costs Applicable	 	Depreciation and	 	All-In Sustaining	 	
 	 	Produced	 	to Sales  (1)	 	Amortization	 	Costs  (2)	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	(ounces in thousands)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	
North America 	 	
456	 	
405	 	$	
733	 	$	
691	 	$	
210	 	$	
171	 	$	
876	 	$	
895	 	
South America (3)	 	
180	 	
248	 	 	
717	 	 	
468	 	 	
409	 	 	
299	 	 	
1,006	 	 	
715	 	
Asia Pacific	 	
578	 	
493	 	 	
569	 	 	
681	 	 	
120	 	 	
142	 	 	
682	 	 	
818	 	
Africa 	 	
202	 	
216	 	 	
556	 	 	
474	 	 	
219	 	 	
171	 	 	
698	 	 	
640	 	
Total/Weighted-Average	 	
1,416	 	
1,362	 	$	
638	 	$	
614	 	$	
201	 	$	
186	 	$	
828	 	$	
849	 	
Attributable to Newmont (4)	 	
1,229	 	
1,186	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	(pounds in millions)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	
North America	 	
11	 	
12	 	$	
2.13	 	$	
1.93	 	$	
0.52	 	$	
0.45	 	$	
2.50	 	$	
2.38	 	
Asia Pacific	 	
130	 	
127	 	 	
0.97	 	 	
1.28	 	 	
0.20	 	 	
0.22	 	 	
1.25	 	 	
1.67	 	
Total/Weighted-Average	 	
141	 	
139	 	$	
1.05	 	$	
1.35	 	$	
0.22	 	$	
0.25	 	$	
1.33	 	$	
1.73	 	
Attributable to Newmont	 	
83	 	
83	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	(tonnes in thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
North America	 	
5	 	
5	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asia Pacific	 	
59	 	
57	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total/Weighted-Average	 	
64	 	
62	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Attributable to Newmont	 	
38	 	
37	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization   and   Reclamation and remediation .  	
	(2)		All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures beginning on page 59 .	
	(3)		All-In Sustaining Costs and Depreciation and Amortization include expense for other South America projects.	
	(4)		Excludes 16 and 14 ounces in 2016 and 2015, respectively, from our interest in La Zanja and 11 and 13 ounces in 2016 and 2015, respectively, from our interest in Duketon. In March 2016, the Company sold its investment in Regis Resources Ltd., which operates the Duketon project.	
 
First quarter 2016 compared to 2015
 
Consolidated gold production increased 4% due to higher production at our Asia Pacific operations and from the inclusion of CC&V production in our North America operations, partially offset by lower production from Africa and South America. Consolidated copper production increased 1% primarily due to higher production at the Batu Hijau operation included in Asia Pacific.
 
Costs applicable to sales per consolidated gold ounce increased 4% due to higher heap leach inventory adjustments, a higher co-product allocation of costs to gold due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages,

51

Table of Contents
partially offset by lower oil prices, a favorable Australian dollar foreign currency exchange rate, higher gold production and lower stockpile inventory adjustments. Costs applicable to sales per consolidated copper pound decreased 22% primarily due to lower oil prices, a favorable Australian dollar foreign currency exchange rate, a lower co-product allocation of costs to copper due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages and higher production.
 
Depreciation and amortization per consolidated gold ounce increased   8% due to higher heap leach inventory adjustments, partially offset by higher production and lower stockpile inventory adjustments. Depreciation and amortization per consolidated copper pound decreased 12% primarily due to higher production.
 
All-in sustaining costs per consolidated gold ounce decreased 2% primarily due to higher production and lower sustaining capital spend, partially offset by higher costs applicable to sales. All-in sustaining costs per consolidated copper pound decreased 23% primarily due to higher production, lower costs applicable to sales and lower sustaining capital spend.
 
North America Operations

 	 	Gold or Copper	 	Costs Applicable	 	Depreciation and	 	All ‑In Sustaining	 	
 	 	Produced	 	to Sales  (1)	 	Amortization	 	Costs  (2)	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	(ounces in thousands)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	
Carlin	 	
206	 	
229	 	$	
913	 	$	
785	 	$	
235	 	$	
198	 	$	
1,087	 	$	
974	 	
Phoenix	 	
56	 	
55	 	 	
921	 	 	
768	 	 	
286	 	 	
199	 	 	
1,038	 	 	
962	 	
Twin Creeks	 	
136	 	
121	 	 	
441	 	 	
481	 	 	
96	 	 	
110	 	 	
507	 	 	
656	 	
CC&V (3)	 	
58	 	 —	 	 	
597	 	 	 —	 	 	
322	 	 	 —	 	 	
673	 	 	 —	 	
Total/Weighted-Average	 	
456	 	
405	 	$	
733	 	$	
691	 	$	
210	 	$	
171	 	$	
876	 	$	
895	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	(pounds in millions)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	
Phoenix	 	
11	 	
12	 	$	
2.13	 	$	
1.93	 	$	
0.52	 	$	
0.45	 	$	
2.50	 	$	
2.38	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	(tonnes in thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Phoenix	 	
5	 	
5	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	(1)		Excludes   Depreciation and amortization   and   Reclamation and remediation .  	
	(2)		All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures beginning on page 59 .	
	(3)		On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired the CC&V gold mining operation.	
 
First quarter 2016 compared to 2015 
 
Carlin, USA.  Gold ounces produced decreased 10% primarily due to lower heap leach recoveries at North Area Leach and lower throughput and recovery at Mill 6. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 16% due to higher underground operating costs at Leeville and lower production, partially offset by lower oil prices. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 19% due to lower ounces sold and capital additions. All-in sustaining costs per ounce increased 12% due to higher costs applicable to sales, partially offset by lower sustaining capital spend.
 
Phoenix, USA. Gold ounces produced increased 2% primarily due to higher mill throughput, partially offset by lower recoveries. Copper pounds produced decreased 8% due to lower heap leach recovery. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 20% primarily due to concentrate inventory adjustments and a higher co-product allocation of costs to gold due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages, partially offset by lower oil prices. Costs applicable to sales per pound increased 10% due to lower production and inventory adjustments, partially offset by a lower co-product allocation of costs to copper due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages and lower oil prices. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 44% due to a higher co-product allocation of costs to gold due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages and inventory adjustments. Depreciation and amortization per pound   increased 16% due to lower production and in-circuit inventory adjustments, partially offset by a lower co-product allocation of costs to copper due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages. All-in sustaining costs per ounce

52

Table of Contents
increased 8% due to higher costs applicable to sales, partially offset by higher production. All-in sustaining costs per pound increased 5% due to lower production, partially offset by lower costs applicable to sales.
 
Twin Creeks, USA. Gold ounces produced increased 12% due to higher ore grade processed at the autoclave as a result of a completed stripping campaign. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 8% due to higher production and lower oil prices, partially offset by lower use of waste material for capital projects. Depreciation and amortization per ounce decreased 13% mainly due to higher production. All-in sustaining costs per ounce decreased 23% due to higher production, lower costs applicable to sales and lower sustaining capital spend.
 
CC&V, USA. We purchased 100% of the Cripple Creek & Victor gold mining operation in Colorado from AngloGold Ashanti Limited on August 3, 2015.
 
South America Operations

 	 	Gold or Copper	 	Costs Applicable	 	Depreciation and	 	All ‑In Sustaining	 	
 	 	Produced	 	to Sales  (1)	 	Amortization	 	Costs  (2)	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	(in thousands)	 	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	
Yanacocha	 	
180	 	
248	 	$	
717	 	$	
468	 	$	
386	 	$	
288	 	$	
944	 	$	
667	 	
Yanacocha (48.65%)	 	
(88)	 	
(121)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Attributable to Newmont (3)	 	
92	 	
127	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.	
	(2)		All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures beginning on page 59 .	
	(3)		Excludes 16 and 14 ounces in 2016 and 2015, respectively, from our interest in La Zanja.	
 
First quarter 2016 compared to 2015
 
Yanacocha, Peru. Gold production decreased 27% primarily due to lower ore grade leached and milled in addition to lower mill recovery, partially offset by higher heap leach tons placed. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 53% due to leach pad inventory adjustments and lower production, partially offset by lower direct operating costs. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 34% due to leach pad inventory adjustments and lower production, partially offset by lower amortization rates. All-in sustaining costs per ounce increased 42% due to higher costs applicable to sales and lower production.

53

Table of Contents
Asia Pacific Operations

 	 	Gold or Copper	 	Costs Applicable	 	Depreciation and	 	All-In Sustaining	 	
 	 	Produced	 	to Sales  (1)	 	Amortization	 	Costs  (2)	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	(ounces in thousands)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	
Boddington	 	
189	 	
184	 	$	
679	 	$	
776	 	$	
145	 	$	
149	 	$	
767	 	$	
866	 	
Tanami	 	
104	 	
99	 	 	
577	 	 	
587	 	 	
183	 	 	
191	 	 	
762	 	 	
755	 	
Waihi (3)	 	 —	 	
41	 	 	 —	 	 	
466	 	 	 —	 	 	
112	 	 	 —	 	 	
512	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	
93	 	
62	 	 	
737	 	 	
976	 	 	
56	 	 	
76	 	 	
807	 	 	
1,131	 	
Batu Hijau	 	
192	 	
107	 	 	
425	 	 	
494	 	 	
84	 	 	
92	 	 	
521	 	 	
663	 	
Total/Weighted-Average	 	
578	 	
493	 	$	
569	 	$	
681	 	$	
120	 	$	
142	 	$	
682	 	$	
818	 	
Batu Hijau (51.5%)	 	
(99)	 	
(55)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Attributable to Newmont (4)	 	
479	 	
438	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	(pounds in millions)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	($ per pound sold)	 	
Boddington	 	
17	 	
18	 	$	
1.58	 	$	
1.92	 	$	
0.32	 	$	
0.34	 	$	
1.87	 	$	
2.25	 	
Batu Hijau	 	
113	 	
109	 	 	
0.91	 	 	
1.16	 	 	
0.19	 	 	
0.20	 	 	
1.19	 	 	
1.56	 	
Total/Weighted-Average	 	
130	 	
127	 	$	
0.97	 	$	
1.28	 	$	
0.20	 	$	
0.22	 	$	
1.25	 	$	
1.67	 	
Batu Hijau (51.5%)	 	
(58)	 	
(56)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Attributable to Newmont	 	
72	 	
71	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	(tonnes in thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	
8	 	
8	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Batu Hijau	 	
51	 	
49	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total/Weighted-Average	 	
59	 	
57	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Batu Hijau (51.5%)	 	
(26)	 	
(25)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Attributable to Newmont	 	
33	 	
32	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.	
	(2)		All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures beginning on page 59 .	
	(3)		On October 29, 2015, the Company sold the Waihi mine .	
	(4)		Excludes 11 and 13 ounces from our interest in Duketon. In March 2016, the Company sold its investment in Regis Resources Ltd., which operates the Duketon operation.	
 
First quarter 2016 compared to 2015
 
Boddington, Australia. Gold production increased 3% primarily due to higher mill throughput as a result of higher mill utilization, and higher recovery, partially offset by lower ore grade milled and a lower draw-down of gold in-circuit inventory. Copper production decreased 6% due to lower ore grade milled, partially offset by higher throughput. Costs applicable to sales per ounce   decreased 13% primarily due to higher production, a favorable foreign currency exchange rate, lower oil prices and stockpile inventory adjustments in the prior year, partially offset by a higher co-product allocation of costs to gold due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages. Costs applicable to sales per pound decreased 18% due to lower oil prices, a favorable Australian dollar foreign currency exchange rate, a lower co-product allocation of costs to copper due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages and stockpile inventory adjustments in the prior year, partially offset by lower production. Depreciation and amortization decreased 3% per ounce and 6% per pound primarily due to stockpile inventory adjustments in the prior year. All-in sustaining costs decreased 11% per ounce and 17% per pound primarily due to lower costs applicable to sales.
 
Tanami, Australia. Gold ounces produced increased 5% mainly due to higher throughput from increased mill feed and utilization, and a draw-down of in-circuit inventory compared to a build in the prior year, partially offset by lower ore grade milled. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 2% due to higher production, a favorable foreign currency exchange rate and lower oil prices, partially offset by higher mine maintenance and underground mining costs. Depreciation and amortization per ounce   decreased 4% primarily due to higher production. All-in sustaining costs per ounce were in line with prior year as higher advanced projects costs were mostly offset by higher production.

54

Table of Contents
Waihi, New Zealand. On October 29, 2015, we completed the sale of the Waihi mine to OceanaGold.
 
Kalgoorlie, Australia. Gold ounces produced increased 50% primarily due to higher throughput as a result of higher mill utilization, and higher ore grade milled as a result of higher ore grade mined, partially offset by lower mill recovery. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 24% due to higher production, a favorable Australian dollar foreign currency exchange rate and lower oil prices, partially offset by higher site support costs. Depreciation and amortization per ounce decreased 26% due to higher production and lower amortization rates. All-in sustaining costs per ounce decreased 29% due to higher production and lower sustaining capital spend.
 
Batu Hijau, Indonesia. Gold ounces produced increased 79% primarily due to higher ore grade milled as a result of higher ore grade mined, higher throughput and a draw-down of in-circuit inventory compared to a build in the prior year. Copper pounds produced increased 4% primarily due to higher throughput, and a draw-down of in-circuit inventory compared to a build in the prior year, partially offset by lower recovery. Costs applicable to sales per ounce decreased 14% primarily due to higher production, partially offset by higher co-product allocation of costs to gold due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages. Costs applicable to sales per pound decreased 22% primarily due to higher production and a lower co-product allocation of costs to copper due to changes in the gold and copper revenue percentages. Depreciation and amortization decreased 9% per ounce and 5% per pound due to higher production. All-in sustaining costs decreased 21% per ounce and 24% per pound due to higher production and lower sustaining capital spend.
 
Africa Operations

 	 	Gold or Copper	 	Costs Applicable	 	Depreciation and	 	All-In Sustaining	 	
 	 	Produced	 	to Sales  (1)	 	Amortization	 	Costs  (2)	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	    	2016	    	2015	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	(in thousands)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	($ per ounce sold)	 	
Ahafo	 	
88	 	
101	 	$	
661	 	$	
559	 	$	
177	 	$	
151	 	$	
851	 	$	
750	 	
Akyem	 	
114	 	
115	 	 	
477	 	 	
400	 	 	
251	 	 	
188	 	 	
565	 	 	
509	 	
Total / Weighted Average	 	
202	 	
216	 	$	
556	 	$	
474	 	$	
219	 	$	
171	 	$	
698	 	$	
640	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation.	
	(2)		All-In Sustaining Costs is a non-GAAP financial measure. See Non-GAAP Financial Measures beginning on page 59 .  	
 
First quarter 2016 compared to 2015
 
Ahafo, Ghana. Gold production decreased 13% due to a build of in-circuit inventory as compared to a draw-down in the prior year, lower ore grade milled and lower recovery. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 18% due to lower production and higher mining and milling costs, partially offset by lower oil prices. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 17% due to lower production. All-in sustaining costs per ounce increased 13% due to lower production.
 
Akyem, Ghana. Gold production decreased 1% due to lower ore grade milled and lower recovery, partially offset by higher throughput and a lower build of in-circuit inventory. Costs applicable to sales per ounce increased 19% due to higher processing costs from higher throughput and higher power costs, partially offset by lower mining costs driven mainly by lower oil prices. Depreciation and amortization per ounce increased 34% primarily due to higher amortization rates and lower production. All-in sustaining costs per ounce increased 11% due to higher costs applicable to sales and lower production, partially offset by lower sustaining capital spend.
 
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
 
Our foreign operations sell their gold and copper production based on U.S. dollar metal prices. Approximately 29% and 37% of Costs applicable to sales   for our foreign operations were paid in currencies other than the U.S. dollar during the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively. Variations in the local currency exchange rates in relation to the

55

Table of Contents
U.S. dollar at our foreign mining operations decreased Costs applicable to sales by approximately $20 per ounce, net of hedging losses, during the first quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources   
 
Operating Activities
 
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities was $524 in the first quarter of 2016, a decrease of $104 from the first quarter of 2015, primarily due to higher operating costs, lower average realized gold and copper prices and a net increase in working capital, partially offset by an increase in consolidated gold ounces sold and copper pounds sold.
 
Investing Activities
 
Net cash used in investing activities decreased to $111 during the first quarter of 2016 compared to $214 during the same period of 2015. Details of investing activities are below:
 
Additions to property, plant and mine development were $297 and $284 during the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively, as follows:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
North America:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
36	 	$	
57	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
4	 	 	
7	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
6	 	 	
19	 	
CC&V (1)	 	 	
21	 	 	 —	 	
Other North America	 	 	
36	 	 	
6	 	
 	 	 	
103	 	 	
89	 	
South America:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Yanacocha 	 	 	
14	 	 	
15	 	
Merian	 	 	
82	 	 	
86	 	
 	 	 	
96	 	 	
101	 	
Asia Pacific:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	 	
11	 	 	
11	 	
Tanami	 	 	
24	 	 	
16	 	
Waihi (2)	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
3	 	 	
7	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
10	 	 	
20	 	
 	 	 	
48	 	 	
60	 	
Africa:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ahafo 	 	 	
17	 	 	
21	 	
Akyem 	 	 	
7	 	 	
11	 	
 	 	 	
24	 	 	
32	 	
Corporate and Other	 	 	
2	 	 	
6	 	
Accrual basis 	 	 	
273	 	 	
288	 	
Decrease (increase) in accrued capital expenditures and other non-cash adjustments	 	 	
24	 	 	
(4)	 	
Cash basis 	 	$	
297	 	$	
284	 	

	(3)		On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired the CC&V gold mining business.	
	(4)		On October 29, 2015, the Company sold the Waihi mine .	
 
Capital expenditures in North America during the first quarter of 2016 primarily related to the development of the Long Canyon project, the mine life extension project at CC&V, surface and underground mine development, tailings facility construction and capitalized component purchases. Capital expenditures in South America primarily related to the development of the Merian project, construction of water treatment facilities, a tailings facility expansion, capitalized

56

Table of Contents
component purchases and infrastructure improvements. The majority of capital expenditures in Asia Pacific were for underground mine development, tailings and support facility construction and equipment and capitalized component purchases in Australia and equipment and capitalized component purchases in Batu Hijau. Capital expenditures in Africa were primarily related to tailings facility expansion, water treatment plant, capitalized component purchases, the Subika Underground project and the Ahafo Mill Expansion project.
 
Capital expenditures in North America during the first quarter of 2015 primarily related to the development of the Turf Vent Shaft project, surface and underground mine development, tailings facility construction and capitalized component purchases. Capital expenditures in South America were primarily related to the Merian project, as well as capitalized component purchases, surface mine development and infrastructure improvements at Yanacocha. The majority of capital expenditures in Asia Pacific were for underground mine development, tailings and support facility construction and mining equipment purchases in Australia and New Zealand and equipment and capitalized component purchases in Batu Hijau. Capital expenditures in Africa were related to tailings facility expansion, capitalized component purchases, the Subika Underground project and the Ahafo Mill Expansion project.
 
Sales of investments. During the first quarter of 2016 we received $184 from the sale of Regis Resources Ltd. During the first quarter of 2015 we received $29 primarily from the maturity of a Certificate of Deposit for $25.
 
Proceeds from sale of other assets. During the first quarter of 2016 we received $6, of which, $4 was cash received from royalties on mineral interests. During the first quarter of 2015 we received $44, of which, $38 was from the sale of Hemlo mineral rights in Ontario, Canada and $6 was from the sale of Relief Canyon in Nevada.  
 
Financing Activities
 
Net cash used in financing activities was $738 and $196 during the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively. Details of financing activities are below:
 
Repayment of debt. During the first quarter of 2016 we paid $499, of which $292 was for the 2019 senior notes, $206 was for the 2039 senior notes and $1 was for capital lease payments. During the first quarter of 2015, we paid $205 in debt, of which $200 was from the 2019 term loan facility and $5 was for the PTNNT revolving credit facility.
 
Scheduled minimum debt repayments are $143 for the remainder of 2016, $765 in 2017, $nil in 2018, $901 in 2019, $nil in 2020 and $3,974 thereafter. We generally expect to be able to fund maturities of debt from Net cash provided by operating activities , current investments, existing cash balances and available credit facilities. Depending upon market conditions and strategic considerations, we may choose to refinance some maturing debt in the capital markets.
 
At March 31, 2016 and 2015, we were in compliance with all debt covenants and provisions related to potential defaults.
 
Sale of noncontrolling interests. We received $37 in proceeds during the first quarter of 2015, of which, $34 related to TMAC’s private placement to raise funds and $3 was for the remaining payment from the government of Suriname for the 25% noncontrolling interest in the Merian project.
 
Funding from noncontrolling interests. We received $12 and $47 in funding during the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively, for the Merian Project from Staatsolie (a company wholly owned by the Republic of Suriname).
 
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests. During the first quarter of 2016, Yanacocha paid dividends of $146 to noncontrolling interests.
 
Dividends paid to common stockholders.  We declared regular quarterly dividends totaling $0.025 per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We paid dividends of $13 and $12 to common stockholders in the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively.

57

Table of Contents
Increase in restricted cash, net. In the   first quarter of 2016, we had a net increase of $91 in restricted cash primarily at PTNNT, of which $70 was for a revolving credit facility payment and $23 was related to reclamation. In the first quarter of 2015, we had a net increase of $55 in restricted cash primarily at PTNNT, of which $45 was for a revolving credit facility payment that was paid later in 2015 and $10 was for reclamation.
 
Discontinued Operations
 
Net cash used in discontinued operations was $2 and $3 in the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively, and related to payments on the Holt property royalty.
 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have the following off-balance sheet arrangements: operating leases (as discussed in Note 28 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed on February 17, 2016 on Form 10-K) and $2,153 of outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and bank guarantees (see Note 22 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). At March 31, 2016, $98 of the $3,000 corporate revolving credit facility was used to secure the issuance of letters of credit, primarily supporting reclamation obligations.
 
We also have sales agreements or commitments to sell copper and gold concentrates at market prices as follows (in thousands of tons):

 	    	2016	    	2017	    	2018	    	2019	    	2020	    	Thereafter	 	
Batu Hijau 	 	
596	 	––	 	––	 	––	 	––	 	––	 	
Boddington 	 	
176	 	
226	 	
165	 	
66	 	
66	 	––	 	
Phoenix	 	
53	 	
46	 	
52	 	
46	 	
47	 	
184	 	
 	 	
825	 	
272	 	
217	 	
112	 	
113	 	
184	 	
 
Other Liquidity Matters
 
At March 31, 2016, the Company had $2,461 in Cash and cash equivalents , of which $1,719 was held in foreign subsidiaries and is primarily held in U.S. dollar denominated accounts with the remainder in foreign currencies readily convertible to U.S. dollars. At March 31, 2016, $807 of the consolidated cash and cash equivalents was attributable to noncontrolling interests primarily related to our Indonesian and Peruvian operations which is being held to fund those operations and development projects. At March 31, 2016, $1,536 in consolidated cash and cash equivalents ($867 attributable to Newmont) was held at certain foreign subsidiaries that, if repatriated, may be subject to withholding taxes. The repatriation of this cash and the applicable withholding taxes would generate foreign tax credits in the U.S. As a result, we expect that there would be no additional tax burden upon repatriation after considering the cash cost associated with the withholding taxes.
 
We believe that our liquidity and capital resources from U.S. operations and flow-through foreign subsidiaries are adequate to fund our U.S. operations and corporate activities.
 
Environmental   
 
Our mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. We have made, and expect to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the full amount of such future expenditures. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, $1,575 and $1,553, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently or recently producing mineral properties.
 
In addition, we are involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Based upon our best estimate of our liability for these matters, $316 and $318 were accrued for such obligations at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. We spent $3 and $21 during the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively, for environmental obligations related to the former, primarily historic, mining activities and have classified $34 as a current liability at March 31, 2016.

58

Table of Contents
 
During the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, capital expenditures were approximately $12 and $37, respectively, to comply with environmental regulations.
 
For more information on the Company’s reclamation and remediation liabilities, see Notes 5 and 22 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Accounting Developments   
 
For a discussion of Recently Adopted and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements, see Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Non-GAAP Financial Measures   
 
Non-GAAP financial measures are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standard meaning prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
 
Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization and Adjusted earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization
 
Management uses Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and EBITDA adjusted for non-core or certain items that have a disproportionate impact on our results for a particular period (“Adjusted EBITDA”) as non-GAAP measures to evaluate the Company’s operating performance. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not represent, and should not be considered an alternative to, net earnings (loss), operating earnings (loss), or cash flow from operations as those terms are defined by GAAP, and does not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. Although Adjusted EBITDA and similar measures are frequently used as measures of operations and the ability to meet debt service requirements by other companies, our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies. The Company believes that Adjusted EBITDA provides useful information to investors and others in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors. Management’s determination of the components of  Adjusted EBITDA  are evaluated periodically and based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts.  Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders  is reconciled to  EBITDA  and  Adjusted EBITDA  as follows:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
52	 	$	
183	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests	 	 	
83	 	 	
46	 	
Loss (income) from discontinued operations	 	 	
26	 	 	
(8)	 	
Equity loss (income) of affiliates	 	 	
5	 	 	
9	 	
Income and mining tax expense (benefit)	 	 	
324	 	 	
193	 	
Depreciation and amortization	 	 	
322	 	 	
289	 	
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest	 	 	
79	 	 	
85	 	
EBITDA	 	$	
891	 	$	
797	 	
Adjustments:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Impairment of investments	 	$	 —	 	$	
57	 	
Restructuring and other	 	 	
13	 	 	
5	 	
Loss on debt repayment	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales	 	 	
(104)	 	 	
(44)	 	
Adjusted EBITDA	 	$	
803	 	$	
815	 	

 

59

Table of Contents
Adjusted net income (loss)  
 
Management uses Adjusted net income (loss) to evaluate the Company’s operating performance, and for planning and forecasting future business operations. The Company believes the use of Adjusted net income (loss) allows investors and analysts to understand the results of the continuing operations of the Company and its direct and indirect subsidiaries relating to the production and sale of minerals, by excluding certain items that have a disproportionate impact on our results for a particular period. The net income (loss) adjustments are generally presented net of tax at the Company’s statutory effective tax rate of 35% and net of our partners’ noncontrolling interests when applicable. The impact of the adjustments through the Company’s Valuation allowance is included in Tax adjustments.   The Tax adjustment includes items such as foreign tax credits, alternative minimum tax credits, capital losses and disallowed foreign losses. Management’s determination of the components of Adjusted net income (loss) are evaluated periodically and based, in part, on a review of non-GAAP financial measures used by mining industry analysts. Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders is reconciled to Adjusted net income (loss) as follows:

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders	 	$	
52	 	$	
183	 	
Loss (income) from discontinued operations (1)	 	 	
26	 	 	
(8)	 	
Impairment of investments (2)	 	 	 —	 	 	
37	 	
Restructuring and other (3)	 	 	
7	 	 	
2	 	
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales (4)	 	 	
(104)	 	 	
(29)	 	
Loss on debt repayment (5)	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	
Tax adjustments (6)	 	 	
199	 	 	
44	 	
Adjusted net income (loss)	 	$	
182	 	$	
229	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss) per share, basic	 	$	
0.10	 	$	
0.37	 	
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	 	 	
0.05	 	 	
(0.01)	 	
Impairment of investments, net of taxes	 	 	 —	 	 	
0.07	 	
Restructuring and other, net of taxes	 	 	
0.01	 	 	 —	 	
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales, net of taxes	 	 	
(0.20)	 	 	
(0.06)	 	
Loss on debt repayment	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Tax adjustments	 	 	
0.38	 	 	
0.09	 	
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, basic	 	$	
0.34	 	$	
0.46	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income (loss) per share, diluted	 	$	
0.10	 	$	
0.37	 	
Loss (income) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	 	 	
0.05	 	 	
(0.01)	 	
Impairment of investments, net of taxes	 	 	 —	 	 	
0.07	 	
Restructuring and other, net of taxes	 	 	
0.01	 	 	 —	 	
Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales, net of taxes	 	 	
(0.20)	 	 	
(0.06)	 	
Loss on debt repayment	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Tax adjustments	 	 	
0.38	 	 	
0.09	 	
Adjusted net income (loss) per share, diluted	 	$	
0.34	 	$	
0.46	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Weighted average common shares (millions):	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic	 	 	
530	 	 	
499	 	
Diluted	 	 	
531	 	 	
500	 	

	(1)		Loss (income) from discontinued operations is presented net of tax expense (benefit) of $(11) and $4, respectively.	
	(2)		Impairment of investments, included in Other income, net , is presented net of tax expense (benefit) of $- and ($20), respectively.	
	(3)		Restructuring and other, included in Other expense, net , is presented net of tax expense (benefit) of ($5) and ($2), respectively and amounts attributed to noncontrolling interest income (expense) of ($1) and ($1), respectively.	
	(4)		Loss (gain) on asset and investment sales, included in Other income, net , are presented net of tax expense (benefit) of $- and $15, respectively.	
	(5)		Loss on debt repayment, included in Other income, net and Interest expense, net of capitalized interest , is presented net of tax expense (benefit) of $(1) and $-, respectively.	
	(6)		Tax adjustments include movements in tax valuation allowance and tax adjustments not related to current period earnings .	

60

Table of Contents
Free Cash Flow
 
Management uses Free Cash Flow as a non-GAAP measure to analyze cash flows generated from operations. Free Cash Flow is Net cash provided by operating activities plus Net cash used in discontinued operations less Additions to property, plant and mine development as presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow. The Company believes Free Cash Flow is also useful as one of the bases for comparing the Company’s performance with its competitors. Although Free Cash Flow and similar measures are frequently used as measures of cash flows generated from operations by other companies, the Company’s calculation of Free Cash Flow is not necessarily comparable to such other similarly titled captions of other companies.
 
The presentation of non-GAAP Free Cash Flow is not meant to be considered in isolation or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of the Company’s performance, or as an alternative to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity as those terms are defined by GAAP, and does not necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. The Company’s definition of Free Cash Flow is limited in that it does not represent residual cash flows available for discretionary expenditures due to the fact that the measure does not deduct the payments required for debt service and other contractual obligations or payments made for business acquisitions. Therefore, the Company believes it is important to view Free Cash Flow as a measure that provides supplemental information to the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow.
 
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure, to Net cash provided by operating activities , which the Company believes to be the GAAP financial measure most directly comparable to Free Cash Flow, as well as information regarding Net cash used in investing activities and Net cash used in financing activities .

 	   	Three Months Ended March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	 	2015	 	
Net cash provided by operating activities	 	$	
522	 	$	
625	 	
Plus: Net cash used in discontinued operations	 	 	
2	 	 	
3	 	
Net cash provided by continuing operating activities	 	 	
524	 	 	
628	 	
Less: Additions to property, plant and mine development	 	 	
(297)	 	 	
(284)	 	
Free Cash Flow	 	$	
227	 	$	
344	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash used in investing activities (1)	 	$	
(111)	 	$	
(214)	 	
Net cash used in financing activities	 	$	
(738)	 	$	
(196)	 	

	(1)		Net cash used in investing activities includes Additions to property, plant and mine development , which is included in the Company’s computation of Free Cash Flow.	
 
Costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound
 
Costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound are non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are calculated by dividing the costs applicable to sales of gold and copper by gold ounces or copper pounds sold, respectively. These measures are calculated on a consistent basis for the periods presented on a consolidated basis. Costs applicable to sales per ounce/pound statistics are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures differently.

61

Table of Contents
The following tables reconcile these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
 
Costs applicable to sales per ounce

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Costs applicable to sales (1)	 	$	
906	 	$	
840	 	
Gold sold (thousand ounces)	 	 	
1,421	 	 	
1,367	 	
Costs applicable to sales per ounce	 	$	
638	 	$	
614	 	

	(1)		Includes by-product credits of $13 and $14 in the first quarter of 2016 and 2015, respectively.	
 
Costs applicable to sales per pound

 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Costs applicable to sales (1)	 	$	
175	 	$	
187	 	
Copper sold (million pounds)	 	 	
167	 	 	
139	 	
Costs applicable to sales per pound	 	$	
1.05	 	$	
1.35	 	

	(1)		Includes by-product credits of $7 and $6 in the first quarter of 2016 and 2015 , respectively.	
 
All-In Sustaining Costs  
 
Newmont has worked to develop a metric that expands on GAAP measures such as cost of goods sold and non-GAAP measures, such as Costs applicable to sales per ounce, to provide visibility into the economics of our mining operations related to expenditures, operating performance and the ability to generate cash flow from operations.
 
Current GAAP-measures used in the mining industry, such as cost of goods sold, do not capture all of the expenditures incurred to discover, develop, and sustain gold production. Therefore, we believe that all-in sustaining costs is a non-GAAP measure that provides additional information to management, investors, and analysts that aid in the understanding of the economics of our operations and performance compared to other producers and in the investor’s visibility by better defining the total costs associated with production.
 
All-in sustaining cost (“AISC”) amounts are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures differently as a result of differences in the underlying accounting principles, policies applied and in accounting frameworks such as in International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), or by reflecting the benefit from selling non-gold metals as a reduction to AISC. Differences may also arise related to definitional differences of sustaining versus development capital activities based upon each company’s internal policies.
 
The following disclosure provides information regarding the adjustments made in determining the all-in sustaining costs measure:
 
Cost Applicable to Sales - Includes all direct and indirect costs related to current gold production incurred to execute the current mine plan.   Costs applicable to sales   (“CAS”) includes by-product credits from certain metals obtained during the process of extracting and processing the primary ore-body. CAS is accounted for on an accrual basis and excludes   Depreciation and a mortization   and   Reclamation and remediation , which is consistent with our presentation of CAS on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of   Income. In determining AISC , only the CAS associated with producing and selling an ounce of gold is included in the measure. Therefore, the amount of gold CAS included in AISC is derived from the CAS presented in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of   Income less the amount of

62

Table of Contents
CAS attributable to the production of copper at our Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines. The copper CAS at those mine sites is disclosed in Note 4 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines is based upon the relative sales percentage of copper and gold sold during the period.
 
Reclamation Costs - Includes accretion expense related to reclamation liabilities and the amortization of the related Asset Retirement Cost (“ARC”) for the Company’s operating properties recorded as an ARC asset. Accretion related to reclamation liabilities and the amortization of the ARC assets for reclamation does not reflect annual cash outflows but are calculated in accordance with GAAP. The accretion and amortization reflect the periodic costs of reclamation associated with current gold production and are therefore included in the measure. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines.
 
Advanced Projects and Exploration - Includes incurred expenses related to projects that are designed to increase or enhance current gold production and gold exploration. We note that as current resources are depleted, exploration and advance projects are necessary for us to replace the depleting reserves or enhance the recovery and processing of the current reserves. As this relates to sustaining our gold production, and is considered a continuing cost of a mining company, these costs are included in the AISC measure. These costs are derived from the   Advanced projects, research and development   and   Exploration   amounts presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of   Income less the amount attributable to the production of copper at our Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Batu Hijau , Boddington and Phoenix mines.
 
General and Administrative - Includes cost related to administrative tasks not directly related to current gold production, but rather related to support our corporate structure and fulfilling our obligations to operate as a public company. Including these expenses in the AISC metric provides visibility of the impact that general and administrative activities have on current operations and profitability on a per ounce basis.
 
Other expense, net - Includes administrative costs to support current gold production. We exclude certain exceptional or unusual expenses from   Other expense, net , such as restructuring, as these are not indicative to sustaining our current gold operations. Furthermore, this adjustment to   Other expense, net   is also consistent with the nature of the adjustments made to Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders as disclosed in the Company’s non-GAAP financial measure Adjusted net income (loss). The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Phoenix, Boddington and Batu Hijau mines.
 
Treatment and Refining Costs - Includes costs paid to smelters for treatment and refining of our concentrates to produce the salable metal. These costs are presented net as a reduction of   Sales .
 
Sustaining Capital - We determined sustaining capital as those capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain current gold production and execute the current mine plan. Capital expenditures to develop new operations, or related to projects at existing operations where these projects will enhance gold production or reserves, are considered development. We determined the classification of sustaining and development capital projects based on a systematic review of our project portfolio in light of the nature of each project. Sustaining capital costs are relevant to the AISC metric as these are needed to maintain the Company’s current gold operations and provide improved transparency related to our ability to finance these expenditures from current operations. The allocation of these costs to gold and copper is determined using the same allocation used in the allocation of CAS between gold and copper at the Batu Hijau , Boddington and Phoenix mines.

63

Table of Contents

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Advanced	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Treatment	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	All-In	 	
 	 	Costs	 	 	 	 	Projects	 	General	 	Other	 	and	 	 	 	 	All-In	 	Ounces	 	Sustaining	 	
Three Months Ended	 	Applicable	 	Reclamation	 	and	 	and	 	Expense,	 	Refining	 	Sustaining	 	Sustaining	 	(000)/Pounds	 	Costs per	 	
March 31, 2016	  	to Sales (1)(2)(3)	  	Costs (4)	  	Exploration	  	Administrative	  	Net  (5)	  	Costs	  	Capital  (6)	  	Costs	  	(millions) Sold	  	oz/lb	 	
Gold	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
189	 	$	
1	 	$	
3	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
32	 	$	
226	 	
208	 	$	
1,087	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
49	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
2	 	 	
55	 	
53	 	 	
1,038	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
60	 	 	
1	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	
69	 	
136	 	 	
507	 	
CC&V (7)	 	 	
33	 	 	
1	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
37	 	
55	 	 	
673	 	
Other North America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
7	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
9	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
North America	 	 	
331	 	 	
4	 	 	
15	 	 	
1	 	 	
2	 	 	
3	 	 	
40	 	 	
396	 	
452	 	 	
876	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Yanacocha	 	 	
128	 	 	
14	 	 	
9	 	 	
3	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
14	 	 	
169	 	
179	 	 	
944	 	
Merian	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Other South America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
8	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
South America	 	 	
128	 	 	
14	 	 	
18	 	 	
5	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
14	 	 	
180	 	
179	 	 	
1,006	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	 	
111	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
4	 	 	
9	 	 	
125	 	
163	 	 	
767	 	
Tanami	 	 	
59	 	 	
1	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
14	 	 	
77	 	
101	 	 	
762	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
65	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
3	 	 	
71	 	
88	 	 	
807	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
100	 	 	
3	 	 	
1	 	 	
3	 	 	 —	 	 	
12	 	 	
4	 	 	
123	 	
236	 	 	
521	 	
Other Asia Pacific	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
3	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
5	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Asia Pacific	 	 	
335	 	 	
6	 	 	
6	 	 	
6	 	 	
1	 	 	
17	 	 	
30	 	 	
401	 	
588	 	 	
682	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ahafo	 	 	
57	 	 	
2	 	 	
5	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
10	 	 	
74	 	
87	 	 	
851	 	
Akyem	 	 	
55	 	 	
2	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
7	 	 	
65	 	
115	 	 	
565	 	
Other Africa	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Africa	 	 	
112	 	 	
4	 	 	
7	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
17	 	 	
141	 	
202	 	 	
698	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Corporate and Other	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
12	 	 	
43	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	
58	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Total Gold	 	$	
906	 	$	
28	 	$	
58	 	$	
56	 	$	
5	 	$	
20	 	$	
103	 	$	
1,176	 	
1,421	 	$	
828	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Phoenix	 	$	
22	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
1	 	$	
1	 	$	
25	 	
10	 	$	
2.50	 	
Boddington	 	 	
23	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
2	 	 	
28	 	
15	 	 	
1.87	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
130	 	 	
5	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
28	 	 	
5	 	 	
169	 	
142	 	 	
1.19	 	
Asia Pacific	 	 	
153	 	 	
5	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
31	 	 	
7	 	 	
197	 	
157	 	 	
1.25	 	
Total Copper	 	$	
175	 	$	
6	 	$	 —	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	
32	 	$	
8	 	$	
222	 	
167	 	$	
1.33	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Consolidated	 	$	
1,081	 	$	
34	 	$	
58	 	$	
57	 	$	
5	 	$	
52	 	$	
111	 	$	
1,398	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .  	
	(2)		Includes by-product credits of $20.	
	(3)		Includes stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments of $28 at Yanacocha, $20 at Carlin, and $2 at Twin Creeks.	
	(4)		Reclamation costs include accretion of $23 and amortization of asset retirement costs of $11.	
	(5)		Other expense, net is adjusted for restructuring costs of $13.	
	(6)		Excludes development capital expenditures, capitalized interest, and the increase in accrued capital of $186. The following are major development projects: Merian, Long Canyon, the Tanami expansion project and the CC&V expansion project.	
	(7)		On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired the CC&V gold mining business.	

64

Table of Contents

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Advanced	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Treatment	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	All-In	 	
 	 	Costs	 	 	 	 	Projects	 	General	 	Other	 	and	 	 	 	 	All-In	 	Ounces	 	Sustaining	 	
Three Months Ended	 	Applicable	 	Reclamation	 	and	 	and	 	Expense,	 	Refining	 	Sustaining	 	Sustaining	 	(000)/Pounds	 	Costs per	 	
March 31, 2015	  	to Sales (1)(2)(3)	  	Costs (4)	  	Exploration	  	Administrative	  	Net (5)	  	Costs	  	Capital (6)	  	Costs	  	(millions) Sold	  	oz/lb	 	
Gold	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Carlin	 	$	
178	 	$	
1	 	$	
3	 	$	
2	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
37	 	$	
221	 	
227	 	$	
974	 	
Phoenix	 	 	
41	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	
4	 	 	
50	 	
52	 	 	
962	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 	
59	 	 	
1	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
18	 	 	
80	 	
122	 	 	
656	 	
Other North America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
5	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
8	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
North America	 	 	
278	 	 	
3	 	 	
11	 	 	
3	 	 	
2	 	 	
2	 	 	
60	 	 	
359	 	
401	 	 	
895	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Yanacocha	 	 	
115	 	 	
24	 	 	
5	 	 	
4	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
15	 	 	
164	 	
246	 	 	
667	 	
Merian	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
2	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Other South America	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
10	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
10	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
South America	 	 	
115	 	 	
24	 	 	
17	 	 	
4	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
15	 	 	
176	 	
246	 	 	
715	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Boddington	 	 	
157	 	 	
2	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 	
9	 	 	
175	 	
202	 	 	
866	 	
Tanami	 	 	
58	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
14	 	 	
74	 	
98	 	 	
755	 	
Waihi (7)	 	 	
19	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
21	 	
41	 	 	
512	 	
Kalgoorlie	 	 	
60	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
7	 	 	
69	 	
61	 	 	
1,131	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
51	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
9	 	 	
6	 	 	
69	 	
104	 	 	
663	 	
Other Asia Pacific	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
3	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
6	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Asia Pacific	 	 	
345	 	 	
7	 	 	
4	 	 	
4	 	 	
2	 	 	
16	 	 	
36	 	 	
414	 	
506	 	 	
818	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ahafo	 	 	
56	 	 	
1	 	 	
6	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
12	 	 	
75	 	
100	 	 	
750	 	
Akyem	 	 	
46	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
11	 	 	
58	 	
114	 	 	
509	 	
Other Africa	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	
1	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
4	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Africa	 	 	
102	 	 	
3	 	 	
7	 	 	
2	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
23	 	 	
137	 	
214	 	 	
640	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Corporate and Other	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
22	 	 	
44	 	 	
6	 	 	 —	 	 	
3	 	 	
75	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	
Total Gold	 	$	
840	 	$	
37	 	$	
61	 	$	
57	 	$	
11	 	$	
18	 	$	
137	 	$	
1,161	 	
1,367	 	$	
849	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Copper	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Phoenix	 	$	
25	 	$	
1	 	$	 —	 	$	 —	 	$	
1	 	$	
1	 	$	
3	 	$	
31	 	
13	 	$	
2.38	 	
Boddington	 	 	
39	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 	
4	 	 	
2	 	 	
45	 	
20	 	 	
2.25	 	
Batu Hijau	 	 	
123	 	 	
5	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
22	 	 	
14	 	 	
165	 	
106	 	 	
1.56	 	
Asia Pacific	 	 	
162	 	 	
5	 	 	 —	 	 	
1	 	 	 —	 	 	
26	 	 	
16	 	 	
210	 	
126	 	 	
1.67	 	
Total Copper	 	$	
187	 	$	
6	 	$	 —	 	$	
1	 	$	
1	 	$	
27	 	$	
19	 	$	
241	 	
139	 	$	
1.73	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Consolidated	 	$	
1,027	 	$	
43	 	$	
61	 	$	
58	 	$	
12	 	$	
45	 	$	
156	 	$	
1,402	 	 	 	 	 	 	

	(1)		Excludes Depreciation and amortization and Reclamation and remediation .  	
	(2)		Includes by-product credits of $20.	
	(3)		Includes stockpile and leach pad inventory adjustments of $24 at Carlin, $2 at Twin Creeks, $4 at Yanacocha, and $19 at Boddington.	
	(4)		Reclamation costs include accretion of $21 and amortization of asset retirement costs of $ 22 .  	
	(5)		Other expense, net is adjusted for restructuring costs of $5.	
	(6)		Excludes development capital expenditures, capitalized interest, and the increase in accrued capital of $128. The following are major development projects as of March 31, 2015: Turf Vent Shaft and Merian.	
	(7)		On October 29, 2015, the Company sold the Waihi mine.	
 
Operating margin per ounce/pound
 
Operating margin per ounce/pound are non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are calculated by subtracting the costs applicable to sales per ounce of gold and per pound of copper from the average realized gold price per ounce and copper price per pound, respectively. These measures are calculated on a consistent basis for the periods presented on a consolidated basis. Operating margin per ounce/pound statistics are intended to provide additional information only and do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by GAAP and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. The measures are not

65

Table of Contents
necessarily indicative of operating profit or cash flow from operations as determined under GAAP. Other companies may calculate these measures differently. Operating margin per ounce/pound is calculated as follows:

 	 	Gold	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Average realized price per ounce	 	$	
1,194	 	$	
1,203	 	
Costs applicable to sales per ounce	 	 	
(638)	 	 	
(614)	 	
Operating margin per ounce	 	$	
556	 	$	
589	 	

 

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Copper	 	
 	 	Three Months Ended 	 	
 	 	March 31, 	 	
 	    	2016	    	2015	 	
Average realized price per pound	 	$	
2.02	 	$	
2.34	 	
Costs applicable to sales per pound	 	 	
(1.05)	 	 	
(1.35)	 	
Operating margin per pound	 	$	
0.97	 	$	
0.99	 	

Safe Harbor Statement   
 
Certain statements contained in this report (including information incorporated by reference herein) are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided for under these sections. Words such as “expect(s)”, “feel(s)”, “believe(s)”, “will”, “may”, “anticipate(s)”, “estimate(s)”, “should”, “intend(s)” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our forward-looking statements may include, without limitation:
 
	·		estimates regarding future earnings and the sensitivity of earnings to gold, copper and other metal prices;	
 
	·		estimates of future mineral production and sales;	
 
	·		estimates of future production costs, other expenses and taxes for specific operations and on a consolidated basis;	
 
	·		estimates of future cash flows and the sensitivity of cash flows to gold and other metal prices;	
 
	·		estimates of future capital expenditures, construction, production or closure activities and other cash needs, for specific operations and on a consolidated basis, and expectations as to the funding or timing thereof;	
 
	·		estimates as to the projected development of certain ore deposits, including the timing of such development, the costs of such development and other capital costs, financing plans for these deposits and expected production commencement dates;	
 
	·		estimates of reserves and statements regarding future exploration results and reserve replacement and the sensitivity of reserves to metal price changes;	
 
	·		statements regarding the availability of, and, terms and costs related to, future borrowing, debt repayment and financing;	
 
	·		estimates regarding future exploration expenditures, results and reserves;	
 
	·		statements regarding fluctuations in financial and currency markets;	

66

Table of Contents

	·		estimates regarding potential cost savings, productivity, operating performance and ownership and cost structures;	
 
	·		expectations regarding the completion and timing of acquisitions or divestitures and projected benefits, synergies and costs associated with acquisitions and related matters;	
 
	·		expectations regarding the start-up time, design, mine life, production and costs applicable to sales and exploration potential of our projects;	
 
	·		statements regarding modifications to hedge and derivative positions;	
 
	·		statements regarding political, economic or governmental conditions and environments;	
 
	·		statements regarding future transactions;	
 
	·		statements regarding the impacts of changes in the legal and regulatory environment in which we operate;	
 
	·		estimates of future costs and other liabilities for certain environmental matters;	
 
	·		estimates of income taxes; and	
 
	·		estimates of pension and other post-retirement costs.	
 
Where we express an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by those forward-looking statements. Such risks include, but are not limited to:
 
	·		the price of gold, copper and other metal prices and commodities;	
 
	·		the cost of operations;	
 
	·		currency fluctuations;	
 
	·		geological and metallurgical assumptions;	
 
	·		operating performance of equipment, processes and facilities;	
 
	·		labor relations;	
 
	·		timing of receipt of necessary governmental permits or approvals;	
 
	·		domestic and foreign laws or regulations, particularly relating to the environment, mining and processing;	
 
	·		changes in tax laws;	
 
	·		domestic and international economic and political conditions;	
 
	·		our ability to obtain or maintain necessary financing; and	
 
	·		other risks and hazards associated with mining operations.	
 
More detailed information regarding these factors is included in the section titled Item 1, Business; Item 1A, Risk

67

Table of Contents
Factors in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 filed February 17, 2016 and elsewhere throughout this report. Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.
 
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Newmont or to persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. We disclaim any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
 
ITEM 3.       QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES  ABOUT MARKET RISK (dollars in millions, except per ounce and per pound amounts).
 
Metal Prices
 
Changes in the market price of gold significantly affect our profitability and cash flow. Gold prices can fluctuate widely due to numerous factors, such as demand; forward selling by producers; central bank sales, purchases and lending; investor sentiment; the strength of the U.S. dollar; inflation, deflation, or other general price instability; and global mine production levels. Changes in the market price of copper also affect our profitability and cash flow. Copper is traded on established international exchanges and copper prices generally reflect market supply and demand, but can also be influenced by speculative trading in the commodity or by currency exchange rates.
 
Decreases in the market price of gold and copper can also significantly affect the value of our product inventory, stockpiles and ore on leach pads, and it may be necessary to record a write-down to the net realizable value (“NRV”). NRV represents the estimated future sales price based on short-term and long-term metals prices, less estimated costs to complete production and bring the product to sale. The primary factors that influence the need to record write-downs of our product inventory, stockpiles and ore on leach pads include short-term and long-term metals prices and costs for production inputs such as labor, fuel and energy, materials and supplies, as well as realized ore grades and recovery rates. The significant assumptions in determining the stockpile, leach pad and product inventory adjustments for each mine site reporting unit at March 31, 2016 included production cost and capitalized expenditure assumptions unique to each operation, a short-term and long-term gold price of $1,183 and $1,300 per ounce, respectively, a short-term and long-term copper price of $2.12 and $3.00 per pound, respectively, and an Australian to U.S. dollar long-term exchange rate of $0.80.
 
The NRV measurement involves the use of estimates and assumptions unique to each mining operation regarding current and future operating and capital costs, metal recoveries, production levels, commodity prices, proven and probable reserve quantities, engineering data and other factors. A high degree of judgment is involved in determining such assumptions and estimates and no assurance can be given that actual results will not differ significantly from those estimates and assumptions.
 
Hedging
 
Our strategy is to provide shareholders with leverage to changes in gold and copper prices by selling our production at spot market prices. Consequently, we do not hedge our gold and copper sales. We have and will continue to manage certain risks associated with commodity input costs, interest rates and foreign currencies using the derivative market.
 
By using derivatives, we are affected by credit risk, market risk and market liquidity risk. Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of a financial instrument. We mitigate credit risk by entering into derivatives with high credit quality counterparties, limiting the amount of exposure to each counterparty and monitoring the financial condition of the counterparties. Market risk is the risk that the fair value of a derivative might be adversely affected by a change in underlying commodity prices, interest rates or currency exchange rates, and that this in turn affects our financial condition. We manage market risk by establishing and monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that may be undertaken. We mitigate this potential risk to our financial condition by establishing trading agreements with counterparties under which we are not required to post any

68

Table of Contents
collateral or be subject to any margin calls on our derivatives. Our counterparties cannot require settlement solely because of an adverse change in the fair value of a derivative. Market liquidity risk is the risk that a derivative cannot be eliminated quickly, by either liquidating it or by establishing an offsetting position. Under the terms of our trading agreements, counterparties cannot require us to immediately settle outstanding derivatives, except upon the occurrence of customary events of default such as covenant breaches, including financial covenants, insolvency or bankruptcy. We further mitigate market liquidity risk by spreading out the maturity of our derivatives over time.
 
Cash Flow Hedges
 
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
 
We had the following foreign currency derivative contracts outstanding at March 31, 2016:

 	 	Expected   Maturity Date	 	
 	    	2016	    	2017	    	2018	    	Total/Average	    	
A$ Operating Fixed Forward Contracts: 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
A$ notional (millions) 	 	
112	 	
105	 	
6	 	
223	 	
Average rate ($/A$) 	 	
0.95	 	
0.93	 	
0.92	 	
0.94	 	
Expected hedge ratio	 	
12	%    	
8	%  	
4	%  	 	 	
 
The fair value of the A$ foreign currency operating derivative contracts was a net liability position of $41 at March 31, 2016 and $60 at December 31, 2015.
 
Diesel Price Risk
 
We had the following diesel derivative contracts in North America outstanding at March 31, 2016:

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Expected   Maturity   Date	 	
 	    	2016	    	2017	    	Total/Average	    	
Diesel Fixed Forward Contracts:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diesel gallons (millions) 	 	
17	 	
11	 	
28	 	
Average rate ($/gallon) 	 	
2.22	 	
1.84	 	
2.06	 	
Expected hedge ratio	 	
58	%   	
38	%  	 	 	
 
The fair value of the Diesel derivative contracts was a net liability position of $25 at March 31, 2016 and $32 at December 31, 2015.
 
Commodity Price Risk
 
Our provisional gold and copper sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separated from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of the gold and copper concentrates at the prevailing indices’ prices at the time of sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through earnings each period prior to final settlement.
 
At March 31, 2016, Newmont had gold sales of 227,000 ounces priced at an average of $1,238 per ounce, subject to final pricing over the next several months. Each $25 change in the price for provisionally priced gold sales would have an approximate $3 effect on our Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders . The London P.M. closing settlement price at March 31, 2016 for gold was $1,237 per ounce.
 
At March 31, 2016, Newmont had copper sales of 194 million pounds priced at an average of $2.19 per pound, subject to final pricing over the next several months. Each $0.10 change in the price for provisionally priced copper sales would have an approximate $7 effect on our Net income (loss) attributable to Newmont stockholders . The LME closing settlement price at March 31, 2016 for copper was $2.20 per pound.

69

Table of Contents
ITEM 4.       CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.   
 
During the fiscal period covered by this report, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its reports is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
On August 3, 2015, the Company acquired the Cripple Creek & Victor gold mining business (“CC&V”) (see Note 3 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements). As permitted by the SEC Staff interpretive guidance for newly acquired businesses, the Company excluded CC&V from the evaluation of internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2016. The Company is continuing the process of integrating internal controls over financial reporting for CC&V. As of March 31, 2016, assets excluded from management’s assessment totaled $1,073 and CC&V contributed 3% of revenue reflected in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
During the third quarter of 2015, the Company began outsourcing certain of its information technology and transactional business processes to a third-party provider. As of March 31, 2016, the Company has transitioned certain procure-to-pay and payroll processes in its Corporate office and its APAC and North America regions as well as certain global information technology processes, including infrastructure and application support and the service desk, to the third-party provider. The Company plans to continue transitioning additional information technology and business processes to the third-party provider through the fourth quarter of 2016. The Company has taken the necessary steps to monitor and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting.
 
There were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2016, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

70

Table of Contents
 
PART I  I—OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.       LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.   
 
Information regarding legal proceedings is contained in Note 22 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 1A.     RISK FACTORS.
 
There were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in Item 1, Business; Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the SEC on February 17, 2016.
 
ITEM 2.       UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

 	 	(a)	 	 	(b)	 	(c)	 	(d)	 	
Period	    	Total Number of Shares Purchased	    	 	Average Price Paid Per Share	    	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	    	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plans or Programs	 	
January 1, 2016 through January 31, 2016	 	 —	 	 	 —	 	 —	 	N/A	 	
February 1, 2016 through February 29, 2016	 	
135,818	(1)	$	
25.89	 	 —	 	N/A	 	
March 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016	 	
1,059	(1)	$	
27.85	 	 —	 	N/A	 	

	(1)		Represents shares delivered to the Company from restricted stock units and performance leverage stock units held by Company employees upon vesting for the purpose of covering the recipients’ tax withholding obligations.	
 
ITEM 3.       DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.   
 
None.
 
ITEM 4.       MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES. 
 
At Newmont, safety is a core value and we strive for superior performance. Our health and safety management system, which includes detailed standards and procedures for safe production, addresses topics such as employee training, risk management, workplace inspection, emergency response, accident investigation and program auditing. In addition to strong leadership and involvement from all levels of the organization, these programs and procedures form the cornerstone of safety at Newmont, ensuring that employees are provided a safe and healthy environment and are intended to reduce workplace accidents, incidents and losses, comply with all mining-related regulations and provide support for both regulators and the industry to improve mine safety.
 
In addition, we have established our “Rapid Response” process to mitigate and prevent the escalation of adverse consequences if existing risk management controls fail, particularly if an incident may have the potential to seriously impact the safety of employees, the community or the environment. This process provides appropriate support to an affected site to complement their technical response to an incident, so as to reduce the impact by considering the environmental, strategic, legal, financial and public image aspects of the incident, to ensure communications are being carried out in accordance with legal and ethical requirements and to identify actions in addition to those addressing the immediate hazards.
 
The operation of our U.S. based mines is subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). MSHA inspects our mines on a regular basis and issues various citations and orders when it believes a violation has occurred under the Mine Act. Following passage of The Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006, MSHA significantly increased the numbers of citations and orders charged against mining operations. The dollar penalties assessed for citations issued has also increased in recent years.

71

Table of Contents
Newmont is required to report certain mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, and that required information is included in Exhibit 95 and is incorporated by reference into this Quarterly Report.
 
ITEM 5.       OTHER INFORMATION. 
 
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
 
On April 19, 2016, notification was provided that Mr. Glenn Culpepper, who currently serves as Senior Vice President and Controller (and Principal Accounting Officer) of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company” or “Newmont”), will be leaving the Company. In connection with Mr. Culpepper’s departure, the Company has determined to promote Mr. John Kitlen from the role of Vice President, Internal Audit to the role of Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, effective as of June 1, 2016, following a transition period with Mr. Culpepper. Until such date, Mr. Culpepper will continue to serve as Senior Vice President, Controller.  The Company thanks Mr. Culpepper for his continued and dedicated service to Newmont during this transition.
 
Mr. Kitlen, age 52, was elected Vice President, Internal Audit in October 2012, having previously served as Director, Internal Audit since joining Newmont in February 2011. Prior to joining Newmont, Mr. Kitlen served as Director, Internal Audit at Sun Microsystems for four years. Previously, he served as the Internal Audit Director for StorageTek and spent more than seven years with Level 3 Communications in various roles including Vice President of Internal Audit, Assistant Corporate Controller and Director of Finance. Mr. Kitlen began his career in public accounting with Deloitte and Touche and holds Bachelor of Science and Master’s degrees in Accounting from the University of Florida and is a Certified Public Accountant.  
 
In this new role, it is expected that Mr. Kitlen will participate in the Company’s standard compensation programs at the E5 Vice President level.  There is no other arrangement or understanding between Mr. Kitlen and any other persons pursuant to which he has been selected for the role. Mr. Kitlen does not have a family relationship with any member of the Board of Directors or any executive officer of the Company, and Mr. Kitlen has not been a participant or had any interest in any transaction with the Company that is reportable under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. 
 
In connection with the previously disclosed transition of the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer role from Mr. Chris Robison to Mr. Tom Palmer, the Company will enter into a six month consulting services agreement with Mr. Robison for transition services following his departure from the role on May 1, 2016.  The consulting services arrangement includes a consulting fee of $60,000 per month for six months for transition support and a completion fee of approximately $335,000 payable upon satisfactory delivery of services for the term of the agreement.  The Company thanks Mr. Robison for his outstanding contributions to Newmont during his tenure as Chief Operating Officer and his continued and dedicated service during this transition.
 
ITEM 6.         EXHIBITS.   
 
	(a)		The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.	

72

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES   
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 	 	N EWMONT  M INING  C ORPORATION	
 	 	(Registrant)	
 	 	 	
Date: April 20, 2016	 	/s/ LAURIE BRLAS	
 	 	Laurie Brlas	
 	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	
 	 	(Principal Financial Officer)	
 	 	 	
Date: April 20, 2016	 	/s/ GLENN CULPEPPER	
 	 	Glenn Culpepper	
 	 	Senior Vice President and Controller	
 	 	(Principal Accounting Officer)	

 

73

Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX   

Exhibit
Number	    	Description	
 	 	 	
10.1	-	2016 Form of Award Agreement used for Executive Officers to grant restricted stock units, pursuant to Registrant’s 2013 Stock Incentive Plan.	
 	 	 	
10.2	-	2016 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for supplemental restricted stock unit award to E. Randall Engel, dated February 22, 2016.	
 	 	 	
10.3	-	2016 Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for supplemental restricted stock unit award to Stephen P. Gottesfeld, dated February 22, 2016.	
 	 	 	
12.1	-	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, filed herewith.	
 	 	 	
31.1	-	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith.	
 	 	 	
31.2	-	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith.	
 	 	 	
32.1	-	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith. (1)	
 	 	 	
32.2	-	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Financial Officer, filed herewith. (1)	
 	 	 	
95	-	Information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, filed herewith.	
 	 	 	
101	-	101.INS	XBRL Instance	
 	 	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema	
 	 	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation	
 	 	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition	
 	 	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels	
 	 	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation	

	(1)		This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8212 and 34-47551.	

74

Exhibit 10.1

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
2013 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 
This Agreement ("Agreement"), dated February 22, 2016, is made between Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont") and “Executive,” as specified in his or her Grant Summary and Grant Acknowledgment (collectively, the “Grant Acknowledgment”).  The Grant Acknowledgment is set forth on the Computershare - Employee Online webpage.
 
The Grant Acknowledgment is incorporated by reference herein.  This Agreement shall be deemed executed by Executive upon his or her electronic execution of the Grant Acknowledgment.  All capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meaning as defined in the Newmont Mining Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan"). 
 
1.            Award of Restricted Stock Units. Newmont hereby grants to Executive the right to receive from Newmont the number of shares of $1.60 par value Common Stock of Newmont (the "Restricted Stock Units" or “RSU’s”) (rounded down to the nearest whole share) specified in the Grant Acknowledgment, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan, including the Vesting Period, as such term is defined in this Agreement, and in connection with such award, Newmont and Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 
2.            Vesting Period. The Vesting Period shall commence on the date of this Agreement and shall end on the dates set forth below as to that percentage of the total shares of Common Stock subject to this Agreement set forth opposite each such date:

Date	    	Percentage Vested	 	
February 22, 2017	 	33%	 	
February 22, 2018	 	33%	 	
February 22, 2019	 	34%	 	
 
3 .             Termination of Employment for death, disability, and following change of control.   Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (i) Executive dies, or (ii) Executive’s employment by Newmont or any Subsidiary terminates by reason of (a) disability (as determined under the terms of the Long-Term Disability Plan of Newmont), or (b) termination of employment entitling Executive to benefits under an Executive Change of Control Plan of Newmont, in any such case prior to the completion of the Vesting Period, the Vesting Period shall terminate, and all RSUs not theretofore forfeited in accordance with this Agreement shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable, as of the date of Executive’s death or other termination of employment, referred to in clause (ii) above.

 

Separation of Employment under a Severance Plan of Newmont or Retirement. 1     Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Executive ceases to be employed by Newmont and/or a Subsidiary prior to completion of the Vesting Period as a result of: a) a termination of employment entitling Executive to benefits under a severance plan of Newmont ,   or; b) retirement under the Pension Plan of Newmont entitling Executive to an immediate pension (not including stable value retirement unless Executive has reached the age of 65 or retirement under the International Retirement Plan of Newmont (“IRP”) entitling Executive to 100% vesting in the IRP supplemental amount), the Vesting Period shall terminate for a pro-rata percentage of the shares granted, based upon the date of grant and separation date, in accordance with the following formula:

 	    	Total Shares	    	Days Elapsed From	    	    	 	 	
 	 	Covered by	 	Date of Grant to Date	 	 	 	 	
Shares	 	This Grant	 	of Termination of	 	 	Prior	 	
vested =	 	Agreement	X	Employment	 	-	Vestings	 	
 	 	 	 	1095	 	 	 	 	
 
If Executive ceases to be employed by Newmont and/or a Subsidiary prior to the completion of the Vesting Period under circumstances other than those set forth above, namely death, disability, termination qualifying for benefits under the Executive Change of Control Plan of Newmont applicable to Executive or separation qualifying for benefits under the Executive Severance Plan of Newmont or retirement as stated above, Executive agrees that any unvested RSUs will be immediately and unconditionally forfeited without any action required by Executive or Newmont, to the extent that the Vesting Period had not ended in accordance with Paragraph 2 as of the date of such cessation of employment.
 
4 .            No Ownership Rights Prior to Issuance of Common Stock.  Executive shall not have any rights as a shareholder of Newmont with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs, including but not limited to the right to vote with respect to such shares of Common Stock, until and after the shares of Common Stock have been actually issued to Executive and transferred on the books and records of Newmont; provided, however, upon vesting of the RSUs pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive’s earlier termination of employment under circumstances entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, Newmont shall make a cash payment to the Executive equal to any dividends paid with respect to shares of Common Stock underlying such RSUs from the date of this Agreement until the date such RSUs vest, minus any applicable taxes.
 
5 .            Withholding Taxes.  Upon vesting pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive’s earlier termination of employment under circumstances entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, Executive shall be entitled to receive the shares of Common Stock, less an amount of shares of Common Stock with a Fair Market Value on the date of

1 Retirement under the Pension Plan of Newmont is more specifically defined as:

If a participant under:	You qualify if:	
Final Average Pay	- You are age 55 and have 10 years of service
- You are age 62	
Stable Value Plan	- Age 65	

-   2  -

vesting equal to the minimum required withholding obligation taking into account Executive's effective tax rate and all applicable federal, state, local and foreign taxes, and Executive shall be entitled to receive the net number of shares of Common Stock after withholding of shares for taxes unless such tax obligations are satisfied in accordance with Paragraph 6.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent any such taxes are required by law to be withheld with respect to the Restricted Stock Units prior to the end of the Vesting Period, Executive agrees that Newmont may withhold such amount for taxes through payroll services from other cash compensation payable to Executive from Newmont.
 
6 .            Delivery of Shares of Common Stock. As soon as reasonably practicable following the date of vesting pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive's earlier termination of employment or other event entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, subject to Section 9(i), Newmont shall cause to be delivered to Executive a stock certificate or electronically deliver shares through a direct registration system for the number of shares of Common Stock (net of tax withholding as provided in Paragraph 5) deliverable to Executive in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; provided ,   however , that Newmont may allow Executive to elect to have shares of Common Stock, which are deliverable in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement upon vesting (or a portion of such shares at least sufficient to satisfy Executive’s tax withholding obligations with respect to such Common Stock), sold on behalf of Executive, with the cash proceeds thereof, net of tax withholding, remitted to Executive, in lieu of Executive receiving a stock certificate or electronic delivery of shares in a direct registration system.
 
7.             Nontransferability.  Executive's interest in the RSUs and any shares of Common Stock relating thereto may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, encumbered or otherwise alienated or hypothecated otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, prior to such time as the shares of Common Stock have actually been issued and delivered to Executive.
 
8.             Acknowledgements.  Executive acknowledges receipt of and understands and agrees to the terms of the RSUs award and the Plan. In addition to the above terms, Executive understands and agrees to the following:
 
(a)          Executive hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and provisions thereof, including the terms and provisions adopted after the date of this Agreement but prior to the completion of the Vesting Period.  If and to the extent that any provision contained in this Agreement is inconsistent with the Plan, the Plan shall govern.
 
(b)          Executive acknowledges that as of the date of this Agreement, the Agreement, the Grant Acknowledgement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between Executive and Newmont regarding the acquisition of shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs in Newmont and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements pertaining to the RSUs.
 
(c)          Executive understands that his or her employer, Newmont and its Subsidiaries hold certain personal information about Executive, including but not limited to his or her name, home address, telephone number, date of birth, social security number, salary, nationality, job title and details of all RSUs or other entitlement to shares of Common Stock awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding ("personal data"). Certain personal

-   3  -

data may also constitute "sensitive personal data" within the meaning of applicable law.  Such data include but are not limited to the information provided above and any changes thereto and other appropriate personal and financial data about Executive. Executive hereby gives explicit consent to Newmont and any of its Subsidiaries to process any such personal data and/or sensitive personal data. Executive also hereby gives explicit consent to Newmont to transfer any such personal data and/or sensitive personal data outside the country in which Executive is employed, including, but not limited to the United States. The legal persons for whom such personal data are intended include, but are not limited to Newmont and its agent, Computershare Investor Services.  Executive has been informed of his or her right of access and correction to his or her personal data by applying to Director of Compensation, Newmont Corporate. 
 
(d)          Executive understands that Newmont has reserved the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time, and that the award of RSUs under the Plan at one time does not in any way obligate Newmont or its Subsidiaries to grant additional RSUs in any future year or in any given amount.  Executive acknowledges and understands that the RSUs are awarded in connection with Executive's status as an employee of his or her employer and can in no event be interpreted or understood to mean that Newmont is Executive's employer or that there is an employment relationship between Executive and Newmont. Executive further acknowledges and understands that Executive's participation in the Plan is voluntary and that the RSUs and any future RSUs under the Plan are wholly discretionary in nature, the value of which do not form part of any normal or expected compensation for any purposes, including, but not limited to, calculating any termination, severance, resignation, redundancy, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments, other than to the extent required by local law.
 
(e)          Executive acknowledges and understands that the future value of the shares of Common Stock acquired by Executive under the Plan is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty and that no claim or entitlement to compensation or damages arises from the forfeiture of the RSUs or termination of the Plan or the diminution in value of any shares of Common Stock acquired under the Plan and Executive irrevocably releases Newmont and its Subsidiaries from any such claim that may arise.
 
(f)          Executive acknowledges that the vesting of the RSUs ceases upon the earlier of termination of employment or receipt of notice of termination of employment for any reason, except as may otherwise be explicitly provided herein, and the Executive irrevocably waives any right to the contrary under applicable law.
 
(g)          Executive acknowledges that the Executive’s acceptance of the RSUs, including the terms and conditions herein, is voluntary.
 
9.             Miscellaneous
 
(a)          No Right to Continued Employment.  Neither the RSUs nor any terms contained in this Agreement shall confer upon Executive any expressed or implied right to be retained in the service of any Subsidiary for any period at all, nor restrict in any way the right of any such Subsidiary, which right is hereby expressly reserved, to terminate his or her employment at any time with or without cause.  Executive acknowledges and agrees that any right to receive delivery of shares of Common Stock is earned only by continuing as an employee of a Subsidiary at the will of such Subsidiary, or satisfaction of any other applicable

-   4  -

terms and conditions contained in this Agreement and the Plan, and not through the act of being hired, being granted the RSUs or acquiring shares of Common Stock hereunder.
 
(b)          Compliance with Laws and Regulations.  The award of the RSUs to Executive and the obligation of Newmont to deliver shares of Common Stock hereunder shall be subject to (i) all applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations, and (ii) any registration, qualification, approvals or other requirements imposed by any government or regulatory agency or body which the Newmont Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or applicable.  Moreover, shares of Common Stock shall not be delivered hereunder if such delivery would be contrary to applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange.
 
(c)          Investment Representation.  If at the time of delivery of shares of Common Stock, the Common Stock is not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and/or there is no current prospectus in effect under the Securities Act with respect to the Common Stock, Executive shall execute, prior to the delivery of any shares of Common Stock to Executive by Newmont, an agreement (in such form as the Newmont Committee may specify) in which Executive represents and warrants that Executive is purchasing or acquiring the shares acquired under this Agreement for Executive's own account, for investment only and not with a view to the resale or distribution thereof, and represents and agrees that any subsequent offer for sale or distribution of any kind of such shares shall be made only pursuant to either (i) a registration statement on an appropriate form under the Securities Act, which registration statement has become effective and is current with regard to the shares being offered or sold, or (ii) a specific exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, but in claiming such exemption Executive shall, prior to any offer for sale of such shares, obtain a prior favorable written opinion, in form and substance satisfactory to the Newmont Committee, from counsel for or approved by the Newmont Committee, as to the applicability of such exemption thereto.
 
(d)          Definitions.  All capitalized terms that are used in this Agreement that are not defined herein have the meanings defined in the Plan. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Plan and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of the Plan shall prevail. 
 
(e)          Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall, if to Newmont, be in accordance with the Plan, and, if to Executive, be in writing and delivered in person or by registered or certified mail or overnight courier, postage prepaid, addressed to Executive at his or her last known address as set forth in Newmont’s records.
 
(f)          Severability.  If any of the provisions of this Agreement should be deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
 
(g)          Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.
 
(h)          Transferability of Agreement.  This Agreement may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by either party hereto, other than by operation of law.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns, including, in the case of Executive, his or her estate,

-   5  -

heirs, executors, legatees, administrators, designated beneficiary and personal representatives. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to prevent transfer of the RSUs in the event of Executive’s death in accordance with Section 14(b) of the Plan.
 
(i)         Specified Employee Delay .  If Newmont determines that settlement of RSUs hereunder (i) constitutes a deferral of compensation for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), (ii) is made to Executive by reason of his or her “separation from service” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A), and (iii) Executive is a “specified employee” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A) at the time settlement would otherwise occur, transfers of Common Stock will be delayed until the first day of the seventh month following the date of such separation from service or, if earlier, on Executive’s death.
 
(j)          Modification.  Except as otherwise permitted by the Plan, this Agreement may not be modified or amended, nor may any provision hereof be waived, in any way except in writing signed by the parties hereto.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Committee may amend this Agreement to the extent it determines necessary or appropriate to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A and the guidance thereunder and any such amendment shall be binding on Executive.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to Executive’s Grant Acknowledgement (including without limitation, the Terms and Conditions section hereof), incorporated herein by reference, and electronically executed by Executive, Executive agrees to the terms and conditions of this Award Agreement. 

-   6  -

 
Exhibit 10.2
 
E. Randall Engel
 
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
2013 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 
This Agreement ("Agreement"), dated February 22, 2016, is made between Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont") and “Executive,” as specified in his or her Grant Summary and Grant Acknowledgment (collectively, the “Grant Acknowledgment”).  The Grant Acknowledgment is set forth on the Computershare - Employee Online webpage.
 
The Grant Acknowledgment is incorporated by reference herein.  This Agreement shall be deemed executed by Executive upon his or her electronic execution of the Grant Acknowledgment.  All capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meaning as defined in the Newmont Mining Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan"). 
 
1.           Award of Restricted Stock Units. Newmont hereby grants to Executive the right to receive from Newmont the number of shares of $1.60 par value Common Stock of Newmont (the "Restricted Stock Units" or “RSU’s”) (rounded down to the nearest whole share) specified in the Grant Acknowledgment, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan, including the Vesting Period, as such term is defined in this Agreement, and in connection with such award, Newmont and Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 
2.           Vesting Period. The Vesting Period shall commence on the date of this Agreement and shall end on February 22, 2021 with full vesting of the entire award occurring on February 22, 2021. 
 
3.            Termination of Employment for death, disability, and following change of control.   Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (i) Executive dies, or (ii) Executive’s employment by Newmont or any Subsidiary terminates by reason of (a) disability (as determined under the terms of the Long-Term Disability Plan of Newmont), or (b) termination of employment entitling Executive to benefits under an Executive Change of Control Plan of Newmont, in any such case prior to the completion of the Vesting Period, the Vesting Period shall terminate, and all RSUs not theretofore forfeited in accordance with this Agreement shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable, as of the date of Executive’s death or other termination of employment, referred to in clause (ii) above.

 
 
Separation of Employment under a Severance Plan of Newmont Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Executive ceases to be employed by Newmont and/or a Subsidiary prior to completion of the Vesting Period as a result of termination of employment entitling Executive to benefits under a severance plan of Newmont ,   the Vesting Period shall terminate for a pro-rata percentage of the shares granted, based upon the date of grant and separation date, in accordance with the following formula:

 	    	Total Shares	    	Days Elapsed From	    	    	 	 	
 	 	Covered by	 	Date of Grant to Date	 	 	 	 	
Shares	 	This Grant	 	of Termination of	 	 	Prior	 	
vested =	 	Agreement	X	Employment	 	-	Vestings	 	
 	 	 	 	1825	 	 	 	 	
 
If Executive ceases to be employed by Newmont and/or a Subsidiary prior to the completion of the Vesting Period under circumstances other than those set forth above, namely death, disability, termination qualifying for benefits under the Executive Change of Control Plan of Newmont applicable to Executive or separation qualifying for benefits under the Executive Severance Plan of Newmont, Executive agrees that any unvested RSUs will be immediately and unconditionally forfeited without any action required by Executive or Newmont, to the extent that the Vesting Period had not ended in accordance with Paragraph 2 as of the date of such cessation of employment.
 
4.            No Ownership Rights Prior to Issuance of Common Stock.  Executive shall not have any rights as a shareholder of Newmont with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs, including but not limited to the right to vote with respect to such shares of Common Stock, until and after the shares of Common Stock have been actually issued to Executive and transferred on the books and records of Newmont; provided, however, upon vesting of the RSUs pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive’s earlier termination of employment under circumstances entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, Newmont shall make a cash payment to the Executive equal to any dividends paid with respect to shares of Common Stock underlying such RSUs from the date of this Agreement until the date such RSUs vest, minus any applicable taxes.
 
5.            Withholding Taxes.  Upon vesting pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive’s earlier termination of employment under circumstances entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, Executive shall be entitled to receive the shares of Common Stock, less an amount of shares of Common Stock with a Fair Market Value on the date of vesting equal to the minimum required withholding obligation taking into account Executive's effective tax rate and all applicable federal, state, local and foreign taxes, and Executive shall be entitled to receive the net number of shares of Common Stock after withholding of shares for taxes unless such tax obligations are satisfied in accordance with Paragraph 6.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent any such taxes are required by law to be withheld with respect to the Restricted Stock Units prior to the end of the Vesting Period, Executive agrees that Newmont may withhold such amount for taxes through payroll services from other cash compensation payable to Executive from Newmont.
 
6.            Delivery of Shares of Common Stock. As soon as reasonably practicable following the date of vesting pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive's earlier termination of

-   2   -

 
 
employment or other event entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, subject to Section 9(i), Newmont shall cause to be delivered to Executive a stock certificate or electronically deliver shares through a direct registration system for the number of shares of Common Stock (net of tax withholding as provided in Paragraph 5) deliverable to Executive in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; provided ,   however , that Newmont may allow Executive to elect to have shares of Common Stock, which are deliverable in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement upon vesting (or a portion of such shares at least sufficient to satisfy Executive’s tax withholding obligations with respect to such Common Stock), sold on behalf of Executive, with the cash proceeds thereof, net of tax withholding, remitted to Executive, in lieu of Executive receiving a stock certificate or electronic delivery of shares in a direct registration system.
 
7.            Nontransferability.  Executive's interest in the RSUs and any shares of Common Stock relating thereto may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, encumbered or otherwise alienated or hypothecated otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, prior to such time as the shares of Common Stock have actually been issued and delivered to Executive.
 
8.           Acknowledgements. Executive acknowledges receipt of and understands and agrees to the terms of the RSUs award and the Plan. In addition to the above terms, Executive understands and agrees to the following:
 
(a)          Executive hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and provisions thereof, including the terms and provisions adopted after the date of this Agreement but prior to the completion of the Vesting Period.  If and to the extent that any provision contained in this Agreement is inconsistent with the Plan, the Plan shall govern.
 
(b)          Executive acknowledges that as of the date of this Agreement, the Agreement, the Grant Acknowledgement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between Executive and Newmont regarding the acquisition of shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs in Newmont and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements pertaining to the RSUs.
 
(c)          Executive understands that his or her employer, Newmont and its Subsidiaries hold certain personal information about Executive, including but not limited to his or her name, home address, telephone number, date of birth, social security number, salary, nationality, job title and details of all RSUs or other entitlement to shares of Common Stock awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding ("personal data"). Certain personal data may also constitute "sensitive personal data" within the meaning of applicable law.  Such data include but are not limited to the information provided above and any changes thereto and other appropriate personal and financial data about Executive. Executive hereby gives explicit consent to Newmont and any of its Subsidiaries to process any such personal data and/or sensitive personal data. Executive also hereby gives explicit consent to Newmont to transfer any such personal data and/or sensitive personal data outside the country in which Executive is employed, including, but not limited to the United States. The legal persons for whom such personal data are intended include, but are not limited to Newmont and its agent, Computershare Investor Services.  Executive has been informed of his or her right of access and correction to his or her personal data by applying to Director of Compensation, Newmont Corporate. 

-   3   -

 
(d)          Executive understands that Newmont has reserved the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time, and that the award of RSUs under the Plan at one time does not in any way obligate Newmont or its Subsidiaries to grant additional RSUs in any future year or in any given amount.  Executive acknowledges and understands that the RSUs are awarded in connection with Executive's status as an employee of his or her employer and can in no event be interpreted or understood to mean that Newmont is Executive's employer or that there is an employment relationship between Executive and Newmont. Executive further acknowledges and understands that Executive's participation in the Plan is voluntary and that the RSUs and any future RSUs under the Plan are wholly discretionary in nature, the value of which do not form part of any normal or expected compensation for any purposes, including, but not limited to, calculating any termination, severance, resignation, redundancy, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments, other than to the extent required by local law.
 
(e)          Executive acknowledges and understands that the future value of the shares of Common Stock acquired by Executive under the Plan is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty and that no claim or entitlement to compensation or damages arises from the forfeiture of the RSUs or termination of the Plan or the diminution in value of any shares of Common Stock acquired under the Plan and Executive irrevocably releases Newmont and its Subsidiaries from any such claim that may arise.
 
(f)          Executive acknowledges that the vesting of the RSUs ceases upon the earlier of termination of employment or receipt of notice of termination of employment for any reason, except as may otherwise be explicitly provided herein, and the Executive irrevocably waives any right to the contrary under applicable law.
 
(g)          Executive acknowledges that the Executive’s acceptance of the RSUs, including the terms and conditions herein, is voluntary.
 
9.            Miscellaneous
 
(a)          No Right to Continued Employment.  Neither the RSUs nor any terms contained in this Agreement shall confer upon Executive any expressed or implied right to be retained in the service of any Subsidiary for any period at all, nor restrict in any way the right of any such Subsidiary, which right is hereby expressly reserved, to terminate his or her employment at any time with or without cause.  Executive acknowledges and agrees that any right to receive delivery of shares of Common Stock is earned only by continuing as an employee of a Subsidiary at the will of such Subsidiary, or satisfaction of any other applicable terms and conditions contained in this Agreement and the Plan, and not through the act of being hired, being granted the RSUs or acquiring shares of Common Stock hereunder.
 
(b)          Compliance with Laws and Regulations.  The award of the RSUs to Executive and the obligation of Newmont to deliver shares of Common Stock hereunder shall be subject to (i) all applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations, and (ii) any registration, qualification, approvals or other requirements imposed by any government or regulatory agency or body which the Newmont Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or applicable.  Moreover, shares of Common Stock shall not be delivered hereunder if such delivery would be contrary to applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange.

-   4   -

 
(c)          Investment Representation.  If at the time of delivery of shares of Common Stock, the Common Stock is not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and/or there is no current prospectus in effect under the Securities Act with respect to the Common Stock, Executive shall execute, prior to the delivery of any shares of Common Stock to Executive by Newmont, an agreement (in such form as the Newmont Committee may specify) in which Executive represents and warrants that Executive is purchasing or acquiring the shares acquired under this Agreement for Executive's own account, for investment only and not with a view to the resale or distribution thereof, and represents and agrees that any subsequent offer for sale or distribution of any kind of such shares shall be made only pursuant to either (i) a registration statement on an appropriate form under the Securities Act, which registration statement has become effective and is current with regard to the shares being offered or sold, or (ii) a specific exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, but in claiming such exemption Executive shall, prior to any offer for sale of such shares, obtain a prior favorable written opinion, in form and substance satisfactory to the Newmont Committee, from counsel for or approved by the Newmont Committee, as to the applicability of such exemption thereto.
 
(d)          Definitions.  All capitalized terms that are used in this Agreement that are not defined herein have the meanings defined in the Plan. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Plan and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of the Plan shall prevail. 
 
(e)          Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall, if to Newmont, be in accordance with the Plan, and, if to Executive, be in writing and delivered in person or by registered or certified mail or overnight courier, postage prepaid, addressed to Executive at his or her last known address as set forth in Newmont’s records.
 
(f)          Severability.  If any of the provisions of this Agreement should be deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
 
(g)          Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware .
 
(h)          Transferability of Agreement.  This Agreement may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by either party hereto, other than by operation of law.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns, including, in the case of Executive, his or her estate, heirs, executors, legatees, administrators, designated beneficiary and personal representatives. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to prevent transfer of the RSUs in the event of Executive’s death in accordance with Section 14(b) of the Plan.
 
(i)         Specified Employee Delay .  If Newmont determines that settlement of RSUs hereunder (i) constitutes a deferral of compensation for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), (ii) is made to Executive by reason of his or her “separation from service” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A), and (iii) Executive is a “specified employee” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A) at the time settlement would otherwise occur, transfers of Common Stock will be delayed until the first day of the seventh month following the date of such separation from service or, if earlier, on Executive’s death.

-   5   -

 
(j)          Modification.  Except as otherwise permitted by the Plan, this Agreement may not be modified or amended, nor may any provision hereof be waived, in any way except in writing signed by the parties hereto.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Committee may amend this Agreement to the extent it determines necessary or appropriate to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A and the guidance thereunder and any such amendment shall be binding on Executive.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to Executive’s Grant Acknowledgement (including without limitation, the Terms and Conditions section hereof), incorporated herein by reference, and electronically executed by Executive, Executive agrees to the terms and conditions of this Award Agreement. 

-   6   -

Exhibit 10.3
 
Stephen P. Gottesfeld
 
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
2013 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT
 
This Agreement ("Agreement"), dated February 22, 2016, is made between Newmont Mining Corporation ("Newmont") and “Executive,” as specified in his or her Grant Summary and Grant Acknowledgment (collectively, the “Grant Acknowledgment”).  The Grant Acknowledgment is set forth on the Computershare - Employee Online webpage.
 
The Grant Acknowledgment is incorporated by reference herein.  This Agreement shall be deemed executed by Executive upon his or her electronic execution of the Grant Acknowledgment.  All capitalized terms that are not defined herein shall have the meaning as defined in the Newmont Mining Corporation 2013 Stock Incentive Plan ("Plan"). 
 
1.           Award of Restricted Stock Units. Newmont hereby grants to Executive the right to receive from Newmont the number of shares of $1.60 par value Common Stock of Newmont (the "Restricted Stock Units" or “RSU’s”) (rounded down to the nearest whole share) specified in the Grant Acknowledgment, pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions and restrictions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan, including the Vesting Period, as such term is defined in this Agreement, and in connection with such award, Newmont and Executive hereby agree as follows: 
 
2.           Vesting Period. The Vesting Period shall commence on the date of this Agreement and shall end on February 22, 2021 with full vesting of the entire award occurring on February 22, 2021. 
 
3.            Termination of Employment for death, disability, and following change of control.   Notwithstanding the foregoing, if (i) Executive dies, or (ii) Executive’s employment by Newmont or any Subsidiary terminates by reason of (a) disability (as determined under the terms of the Long-Term Disability Plan of Newmont), or (b) termination of employment entitling Executive to benefits under an Executive Change of Control Plan of Newmont, in any such case prior to the completion of the Vesting Period, the Vesting Period shall terminate, and all RSUs not theretofore forfeited in accordance with this Agreement shall become fully vested and nonforfeitable, as of the date of Executive’s death or other termination of employment, referred to in clause (ii) above.

 
 
Separation of Employment under a Severance Plan of Newmont Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Executive ceases to be employed by Newmont and/or a Subsidiary prior to completion of the Vesting Period as a result of termination of employment entitling Executive to benefits under a severance plan of Newmont ,   the Vesting Period shall terminate for a pro-rata percentage of the shares granted, based upon the date of grant and separation date, in accordance with the following formula:

 	    	Total Shares	    	Days Elapsed From	    	    	 	 	
 	 	Covered by	 	Date of Grant to Date	 	 	 	 	
Shares	 	This Grant	 	of Termination of	 	 	Prior	 	
vested =	 	Agreement	X	Employment	 	-	Vestings	 	
 	 	 	 	1825	 	 	 	 	
 
If Executive ceases to be employed by Newmont and/or a Subsidiary prior to the completion of the Vesting Period under circumstances other than those set forth above, namely death, disability, termination qualifying for benefits under the Executive Change of Control Plan of Newmont applicable to Executive or separation qualifying for benefits under the Executive Severance Plan of Newmont, Executive agrees that any unvested RSUs will be immediately and unconditionally forfeited without any action required by Executive or Newmont, to the extent that the Vesting Period had not ended in accordance with Paragraph 2 as of the date of such cessation of employment.
 
4.            No Ownership Rights Prior to Issuance of Common Stock.  Executive shall not have any rights as a shareholder of Newmont with respect to the shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs, including but not limited to the right to vote with respect to such shares of Common Stock, until and after the shares of Common Stock have been actually issued to Executive and transferred on the books and records of Newmont; provided, however, upon vesting of the RSUs pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive’s earlier termination of employment under circumstances entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, Newmont shall make a cash payment to the Executive equal to any dividends paid with respect to shares of Common Stock underlying such RSUs from the date of this Agreement until the date such RSUs vest, minus any applicable taxes.
 
5.            Withholding Taxes.  Upon vesting pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive’s earlier termination of employment under circumstances entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, Executive shall be entitled to receive the shares of Common Stock, less an amount of shares of Common Stock with a Fair Market Value on the date of vesting equal to the minimum required withholding obligation taking into account Executive's effective tax rate and all applicable federal, state, local and foreign taxes, and Executive shall be entitled to receive the net number of shares of Common Stock after withholding of shares for taxes unless such tax obligations are satisfied in accordance with Paragraph 6.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent any such taxes are required by law to be withheld with respect to the Restricted Stock Units prior to the end of the Vesting Period, Executive agrees that Newmont may withhold such amount for taxes through payroll services from other cash compensation payable to Executive from Newmont.
 
6.            Delivery of Shares of Common Stock. As soon as reasonably practicable following the date of vesting pursuant to the Vesting Period, or Executive's earlier termination of

-   2   -

 
 
employment or other event entitling Executive to vest in the RSUs pursuant to Paragraph 3, subject to Section 9(i), Newmont shall cause to be delivered to Executive a stock certificate or electronically deliver shares through a direct registration system for the number of shares of Common Stock (net of tax withholding as provided in Paragraph 5) deliverable to Executive in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement; provided ,   however , that Newmont may allow Executive to elect to have shares of Common Stock, which are deliverable in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement upon vesting (or a portion of such shares at least sufficient to satisfy Executive’s tax withholding obligations with respect to such Common Stock), sold on behalf of Executive, with the cash proceeds thereof, net of tax withholding, remitted to Executive, in lieu of Executive receiving a stock certificate or electronic delivery of shares in a direct registration system.
 
7.            Nontransferability.  Executive's interest in the RSUs and any shares of Common Stock relating thereto may not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, encumbered or otherwise alienated or hypothecated otherwise than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, prior to such time as the shares of Common Stock have actually been issued and delivered to Executive.
 
8.           Acknowledgements. Executive acknowledges receipt of and understands and agrees to the terms of the RSUs award and the Plan. In addition to the above terms, Executive understands and agrees to the following:
 
(a)          Executive hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees to be bound by all of the terms and provisions thereof, including the terms and provisions adopted after the date of this Agreement but prior to the completion of the Vesting Period.  If and to the extent that any provision contained in this Agreement is inconsistent with the Plan, the Plan shall govern.
 
(b)          Executive acknowledges that as of the date of this Agreement, the Agreement, the Grant Acknowledgement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between Executive and Newmont regarding the acquisition of shares of Common Stock underlying the RSUs in Newmont and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements pertaining to the RSUs.
 
(c)          Executive understands that his or her employer, Newmont and its Subsidiaries hold certain personal information about Executive, including but not limited to his or her name, home address, telephone number, date of birth, social security number, salary, nationality, job title and details of all RSUs or other entitlement to shares of Common Stock awarded, canceled, exercised, vested, unvested or outstanding ("personal data"). Certain personal data may also constitute "sensitive personal data" within the meaning of applicable law.  Such data include but are not limited to the information provided above and any changes thereto and other appropriate personal and financial data about Executive. Executive hereby gives explicit consent to Newmont and any of its Subsidiaries to process any such personal data and/or sensitive personal data. Executive also hereby gives explicit consent to Newmont to transfer any such personal data and/or sensitive personal data outside the country in which Executive is employed, including, but not limited to the United States. The legal persons for whom such personal data are intended include, but are not limited to Newmont and its agent, Computershare Investor Services.  Executive has been informed of his or her right of access and correction to his or her personal data by applying to Director of Compensation, Newmont Corporate. 

-   3   -

 
(d)          Executive understands that Newmont has reserved the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time, and that the award of RSUs under the Plan at one time does not in any way obligate Newmont or its Subsidiaries to grant additional RSUs in any future year or in any given amount.  Executive acknowledges and understands that the RSUs are awarded in connection with Executive's status as an employee of his or her employer and can in no event be interpreted or understood to mean that Newmont is Executive's employer or that there is an employment relationship between Executive and Newmont. Executive further acknowledges and understands that Executive's participation in the Plan is voluntary and that the RSUs and any future RSUs under the Plan are wholly discretionary in nature, the value of which do not form part of any normal or expected compensation for any purposes, including, but not limited to, calculating any termination, severance, resignation, redundancy, end of service payments, bonuses, long-service awards, pension or retirement benefits or similar payments, other than to the extent required by local law.
 
(e)          Executive acknowledges and understands that the future value of the shares of Common Stock acquired by Executive under the Plan is unknown and cannot be predicted with certainty and that no claim or entitlement to compensation or damages arises from the forfeiture of the RSUs or termination of the Plan or the diminution in value of any shares of Common Stock acquired under the Plan and Executive irrevocably releases Newmont and its Subsidiaries from any such claim that may arise.
 
(f)          Executive acknowledges that the vesting of the RSUs ceases upon the earlier of termination of employment or receipt of notice of termination of employment for any reason, except as may otherwise be explicitly provided herein, and the Executive irrevocably waives any right to the contrary under applicable law.
 
(g)          Executive acknowledges that the Executive’s acceptance of the RSUs, including the terms and conditions herein, is voluntary.
 
9.            Miscellaneous
 
(a)          No Right to Continued Employment.  Neither the RSUs nor any terms contained in this Agreement shall confer upon Executive any expressed or implied right to be retained in the service of any Subsidiary for any period at all, nor restrict in any way the right of any such Subsidiary, which right is hereby expressly reserved, to terminate his or her employment at any time with or without cause.  Executive acknowledges and agrees that any right to receive delivery of shares of Common Stock is earned only by continuing as an employee of a Subsidiary at the will of such Subsidiary, or satisfaction of any other applicable terms and conditions contained in this Agreement and the Plan, and not through the act of being hired, being granted the RSUs or acquiring shares of Common Stock hereunder.
 
(b)          Compliance with Laws and Regulations.  The award of the RSUs to Executive and the obligation of Newmont to deliver shares of Common Stock hereunder shall be subject to (i) all applicable federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules and regulations, and (ii) any registration, qualification, approvals or other requirements imposed by any government or regulatory agency or body which the Newmont Committee shall, in its sole discretion, determine to be necessary or applicable.  Moreover, shares of Common Stock shall not be delivered hereunder if such delivery would be contrary to applicable law or the rules of any stock exchange.

-   4   -

 
(c)          Investment Representation.  If at the time of delivery of shares of Common Stock, the Common Stock is not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and/or there is no current prospectus in effect under the Securities Act with respect to the Common Stock, Executive shall execute, prior to the delivery of any shares of Common Stock to Executive by Newmont, an agreement (in such form as the Newmont Committee may specify) in which Executive represents and warrants that Executive is purchasing or acquiring the shares acquired under this Agreement for Executive's own account, for investment only and not with a view to the resale or distribution thereof, and represents and agrees that any subsequent offer for sale or distribution of any kind of such shares shall be made only pursuant to either (i) a registration statement on an appropriate form under the Securities Act, which registration statement has become effective and is current with regard to the shares being offered or sold, or (ii) a specific exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, but in claiming such exemption Executive shall, prior to any offer for sale of such shares, obtain a prior favorable written opinion, in form and substance satisfactory to the Newmont Committee, from counsel for or approved by the Newmont Committee, as to the applicability of such exemption thereto.
 
(d)          Definitions.  All capitalized terms that are used in this Agreement that are not defined herein have the meanings defined in the Plan. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Plan and the terms of this Agreement, the terms of the Plan shall prevail. 
 
(e)          Notices. Any notice or other communication required or permitted hereunder shall, if to Newmont, be in accordance with the Plan, and, if to Executive, be in writing and delivered in person or by registered or certified mail or overnight courier, postage prepaid, addressed to Executive at his or her last known address as set forth in Newmont’s records.
 
(f)          Severability.  If any of the provisions of this Agreement should be deemed unenforceable, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect.
 
(g)          Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware .
 
(h)          Transferability of Agreement.  This Agreement may not be transferred, assigned, pledged or hypothecated by either party hereto, other than by operation of law.  This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns, including, in the case of Executive, his or her estate, heirs, executors, legatees, administrators, designated beneficiary and personal representatives. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to prevent transfer of the RSUs in the event of Executive’s death in accordance with Section 14(b) of the Plan.
 
(i)         Specified Employee Delay .  If Newmont determines that settlement of RSUs hereunder (i) constitutes a deferral of compensation for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), (ii) is made to Executive by reason of his or her “separation from service” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A), and (iii) Executive is a “specified employee” (within the meaning of Code Section 409A) at the time settlement would otherwise occur, transfers of Common Stock will be delayed until the first day of the seventh month following the date of such separation from service or, if earlier, on Executive’s death.

-   5   -

 
(j)          Modification.  Except as otherwise permitted by the Plan, this Agreement may not be modified or amended, nor may any provision hereof be waived, in any way except in writing signed by the parties hereto.  Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Committee may amend this Agreement to the extent it determines necessary or appropriate to comply with the requirements of Code Section 409A and the guidance thereunder and any such amendment shall be binding on Executive.
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, pursuant to Executive’s Grant Acknowledgement (including without limitation, the Terms and Conditions section hereof), incorporated herein by reference, and electronically executed by Executive, Executive agrees to the terms and conditions of this Award Agreement. 

-   6   -

Exhibit 12.1
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Amounts in millions, except ratio)

 	 	Three Months Ended	 	
 	    	March 31, 2016	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
Income before income and mining tax and other items	 	$	
490	 	
Adjustments:	 	 	 	 	
Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest	 	 	
83	 	
Earnings available for fixed charges	 	$	
573	 	
Fixed Charges:	 	 	 	 	
Net interest expense (1)	 	$	
79	 	
Portion of rental expense representative of interest 	 	 	
4	 	
Fixed charges added to earnings 	 	 	
83	 	
Capitalized interest 	 	 	
10	 	
Total Fixed Charges	 	$	
93	 	
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 	 	 	
6.16	 	

	(1)		Includes interest expense of majority-owned subsidiaries and amortization of debt issuance costs.	

Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
I, Gary J. Goldberg, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newmont Mining Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 	/s/ GARY J. GOLDBERG	
 	Gary J. Goldberg	
 	Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)	
 
April 20, 2016

Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
I, Laurie Brlas, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Newmont Mining Corporation;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 	/s/ LAURIE BRLAS	
 	Laurie Brlas	
 	Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)	
 
April 20, 2016

Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Gary J. Goldberg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, that to my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 	/s/ GARY J. GOLDBERG	
 	Gary J. Goldberg
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)	
 
April 20, 2016
Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) and pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Laurie Brlas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that to my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 	/s/ LAURIE BRLAS	
 	Laurie Brlas
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)	
 
April 20, 2016
Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Exhibit 95
Mine Safety Disclosure
The following disclosures are provided pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) and Item 104 of Regulation S-K, which require certain disclosures by companies required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that operate mines regulated under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”). The disclosures reflect our U.S. mining operations only as the requirements of the Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K do not apply to our mines operated outside the United States.
Mine Safety Information. Whenever the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) believes a violation of the Mine Act, any health or safety standard or any regulation has occurred, it may issue a citation which describes the alleged violation and fixes a time within which the U.S. mining operator (e.g. our subsidiary, Newmont USA Limited) must abate the alleged violation. In some situations, such as when MSHA believes that conditions pose a hazard to miners, MSHA may issue an order removing miners from the area of the mine affected by the condition until the alleged hazards are corrected. When MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, as a result of the alleged violation, that the operator is ordered to pay. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed. The number of citations, orders and proposed assessments vary depending on the size and type (underground or surface) of the mine as well as by the MSHA inspector(s) assigned.
The below table reflects citations and orders issued to us by MSHA during the quarter ended March 31, 2016. The proposed assessments for the quarter ended March 31, 2016 were taken from the MSHA data retrieval system as of April 7, 2016.
Additional information about the Act and MSHA references used in the table follows.
	·		Section 104(a) S&S Citations : Citations received from MSHA under section 104(a) of the Mine Act for violations of mandatory health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to the cause and effect of a mine safety or health hazard.	
	·		Section 104(b) Orders : Orders issued by MSHA under section 104(b) of the Mine Act, which represents a failure to abate a citation under section 104(a) within the period of time prescribed by MSHA. This results in an order of immediate withdrawal from the area of the mine affected by the condition until MSHA determines that the violation has been abated.	
	·		Section 104(d) S&S Citations and Orders : Citations and orders issued by MSHA under section 104(d) of the Mine Act for unwarrantable failure to comply with mandatory, significant and substantial health or safety standards.	
	·		Section 110(b)(2) Violations : Flagrant violations issued by MSHA under section 110(b)(2) of the Mine Act.	
	·		Section 107(a) Orders : Orders issued by MSHA under section 107(a) of the Mine Act for situations in which MSHA determined an “imminent danger” (as defined by MSHA) existed.	

 	    	 	    	 	    	Section	    	 	    	 	    	 	 	    	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	104(d) S&S	 	 	 	 	 	($ in millions)	 	 	 	
 	 	Section	 	Section	 	Citations	 	Section	 	Section	 	Proposed	 	 	 	
 	 	104(a) S&S	 	104(b)	 	and	 	110(b)	 	107(a)	 	MSHA	 	 	 	
Mine  (1)	 	Citations  (2)	 	Orders	 	Orders  (2)	 	Violations	 	Orders	 	Assessments  (3)	 	Fatalities	 	
Chukar	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Cripple Creek & Victor	 	
10	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Emigrant	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	—	 	 —	 	
Exodus	 	—	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Genesis	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	—	 	 —	 	
Leeville	 	
2	 	 —	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Lone Tree	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Long Canyon	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Midas	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Mill 6	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	—	 	 —	 	
Pete Bajo	 	
2	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
Phoenix	 	—	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
South Area	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	—	 	 —	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	—	 	 —	 	
Vista	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	 —	 	 —	 	
TOTAL	 	
17	 	 —	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	$	
0.007	 	 —	 	

 

	(1)		The definition of a mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting minerals, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools, and minerals preparation facilities. Unless otherwise indicated, any of these other items associated with a single mine have been aggregated in the totals for that mine. MSHA assigns an identification number to each mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation facilities. We are providing the information in the table by mine rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our mining business and we believe this presentation will be more useful to investors than providing information based on MSHA identification numbers.	
	(2)		17 Section 104(a) S&S Citations and 1 Section 104(d) S&S Citations and Orders were subject to contest as of March 31, 2016.	
	(3)		Represents the total dollar value of the proposed assessment from MSHA under the Mine Act pursuant to the citations and or orders preceding such dollar value in the corresponding row. No proposed assessments of the orders or citations listed above had yet been posted to the MSHA data retrieval system or made available to the Company by MSHA as of April 7, 2016. Proposed assessments aggregate to $7,314 for the quarter, with proposed assessments at CC&V of $5,671, at Emigrant of $634, at Mill 6 of $285 and at Pete Bajo of $724.	
Pattern or Potential Pattern of Violations . During the quarter ended March 31, 2016, none of the mines operated by us received written notice from MSHA of (a) a pattern of violations of mandatory health or safety standards that are of such nature as could have significantly and substantially contributed to the cause and effect of mine health or safety hazards under section 104(e) of the Mine Act or (b) the potential to have such a pattern.
Pending Legal Actions . The following table reflects pending legal actions before the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission (the “Commission”), an independent adjudicative agency that provides administrative trial and appellate review of legal disputes arising under the Mine Act, as of March 31, 2016, together with the number of legal actions instituted and the number of legal actions resolved as of March 31, 2016.

 	    	Pending Legal	    	Legal Actions	    	Legal Actions	 	
 	 	Actions as of	 	Instituted as of	 	Resolved as of 	 	
Mine  (1)	 	March 31, 2016  (2)	 	March 31, 2016	 	March 31, 2016	 	
Chukar	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Cripple Creek & Victor  (3)	 	
2	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Emigrant	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Exodus	 	
2	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Genesis	 	
3	 	
2	 	 —	 	
Leeville	 	
9	 	
3	 	
3	 	
Lone Tree	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Long Canyon	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Midas	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Mill 6	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Pete Bajo	 	
1	 	
1	 	 —	 	
Phoenix	 	
3	 	 —	 	 —	 	
South Area	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Vista	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
TOTAL	 	
22	 	
6	 	
3	 	

	(1)		The definition of a mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting minerals, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and minerals preparation facilities. Unless otherwise indicated, any of these other items associated with a single mine have been aggregated in the totals for that mine. MSHA assigns an identification number to each mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation facilities. We are providing the information in the table by mine rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our mining business and we believe this presentation will be more useful to investors than providing information based on MSHA identification numbers.	
	(2)		The foregoing list includes legal actions which were initiated prior to the current reporting period and which do not necessarily relate to citations, orders or proposed assessments issued by MSHA during the quarter ended March 31, 2016. The number of legal actions noted above are reported on a per docket basis.	
	(3)		The legal actions reported in the table above for Cripple Creek & Victor related to legal disputes arising prior to the closing of Newmont’s purchase of the operation.	

 

Legal actions pending before the Commission may involve, among other questions, challenges by operators to citations, orders and penalties they have received from MSHA or complaints of discrimination by miners under section 105 of the Mine Act. The following is a brief description of the types of legal actions that may be brought before the Commission.
	·		Contests of Citations and Orders: A contest proceeding may be filed with the Commission by operators, miners or miners’ representatives to challenge the issuance of a citation or order issued by MSHA.	
	·		Contests of Proposed Penalties (Petitions for Assessment of Penalties) : A contest of a proposed penalty is an administrative proceeding before the Commission challenging a civil penalty that MSHA has proposed for the alleged violation contained in a citation or order. The validity of the citation may also be challenged in this proceeding as well.	
	·		Complaints for Compensation: A complaint for compensation may be filed with the Commission by miners entitled to compensation when a mine is closed by certain withdrawal orders issued by MSHA. The purpose of the proceeding is to determine the amount of compensation, if any, due miners idled by the orders.	
	·		Complaints of Discharge, Discrimination or Interference : A discrimination proceeding is a case that involves a miner’s allegation that he or she has suffered a wrong by the operator because he or she engaged in some type of activity protected under the Mine Act, such as making a safety complaint.	
	·		Applications for Temporary Relief : An application for temporary relief from any modification or termination of any order or from any order issued under section 104 of the Mine Act.	
	·		Appeals of Judges’ Decisions or Orders to the Commission : A filing with the Commission of a petition for discretionary review of a Judge’s decision or order by a person who has been adversely affected or aggrieved by such decision or order.	
The following table reflects the types of legal actions pending before the Commission as of March 31, 2016.

 	    	 	    	 	    	 	    	 	    	 	    	Appeals of	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Complaints of	 	 	 	Judges'	 	
 	 	Contests of	 	Contests of	 	 	 	Discharge,	 	Applications	 	Decisions or	 	
 	 	Citations and	 	Proposed	 	Complaints for	 	Discrimination or	 	for Temporary	 	Orders to the	 	
Mine  (1)	 	Orders	 	Penalties  (2)	 	Compensation	 	Interference	 	Relief	 	Commission	 	
Chukar	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Cripple Creek & Victor	 	
1	 	
2	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Emigrant	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Exodus	 	 —	 	
2	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Genesis	 	 —	 	
3	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Leeville	 	 —	 	
9	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Lone Tree	 	 —	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Long Canyon	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Midas	 	 —	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
1	 	
Mill 6	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Pete Bajo	 	 —	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Phoenix	 	 —	 	
2	 	 —	 	
1	 	 —	 	 —	 	
South Area	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Twin Creeks	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
Vista	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	 —	 	
TOTAL	 	
1	 	
21	 	 —	 	
1	 	 —	 	
1	 	

	(1)		The definition of a mine under section 3 of the Mine Act includes the mine, as well as other items used in, or to be used in, or resulting from, the work of extracting minerals, such as land, structures, facilities, equipment, machines, tools and minerals preparation facilities. Unless otherwise indicated, any of these other items associated with a single mine have been aggregated in the totals for that mine. MSHA assigns an identification number to each mine and may or may not assign separate identification numbers to related facilities such as preparation facilities. We are providing the information in the table by mine rather than MSHA identification number because that is how we manage and operate our mining business and we believe this presentation will be more useful to investors than providing information based on MSHA identification numbers.	
	(2)		The number of contests of proposed penalties noted above is reported on a per docket basis. If presented on a per citation basis the number of contests of proposed penalties would be Cripple Creek & Victor: 3; Exodus: 3; Genesis: 4; Leeville: 28; Lone Tree: 2; Midas: 1; Pete Bajo: 1; Phoenix: 4.