UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
 
Form 10-Q/A
(Amendment No. 1)
 
(Mark One)
 
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2003
 
or
 
¨  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from                      to                     
 
Commission File Number: 001-31240
 
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware	 	84-1611629	
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)	 	(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)	
		
1700 Lincoln Street	 	80203	
Denver, Colorado	 	(Zip Code)	
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	 	 	
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (303) 863-7414
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     x   Yes     ¨   No
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12-b2 of the Exchange Act).     x   Yes     ¨   No
 
There were 364,076,754 shares of common stock outstanding on July 30, 2003 (and 43,989,956 exchangeable shares).

Explanatory Note
 
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-Q/A (this “Amendment”) amends the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 filed on August 4, 2003. Newmont Mining Corporation has filed this amendment to provide additional information and to make certain corrections to Note 17, Segment Information, in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Other information contained herein has not been updated. Therefore, you should read this Amendment with other documents that we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Information in such reports and documents update and supersede certain information contained in this Amendment.

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
 	  	Three Months Ended
June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands,
except per share)	 	
Revenues	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales—gold	  	$	724,026	 	 	$	609,516	 	
Sales—base metals, net	  	 	12,735	 	 	 	22,935	 	
Royalties	  	 	10,461	 	 	 	11,202	 	
 	  				 				
 	  	 	747,222	 	 	 	643,653	 	
 	  				 				
Costs and expenses	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	  	 	423,700	 	 	 	383,515	 	
Base metals	  	 	9,973	 	 	 	8,674	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	  	 	139,337	 	 	 	123,602	 	
Exploration and research	  	 	30,247	 	 	 	18,788	 	
General and administrative	  	 	31,292	 	 	 	27,652	 	
Write-down of long-lived assets	  	 	1,794	 	 	 	––  	 	
Other	  	 	2,454	 	 	 	(1,791	)	
 	  				 				
 	  	 	638,797	 	 	 	560,440	 	
 	  				 				
Other income (expense)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain on investments, net	  	 	––  	 	 	 	47,298	 	
Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net	  	 	16,644	 	 	 	(9,478	)	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net	  	 	94,414	 	 	 	––  	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net	  	 	76,578	 	 	 	––  	 	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income	  	 	32,318	 	 	 	14,843	 	
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $1,758 and $1,223, respectively	  	 	(22,669	)	 	 	(35,101	)	
 	  				 				
 	  	 	197,285	 	 	 	17,562	 	
 	  				 				
Pre-tax income before minority interest, equity (loss) income and impairment of affiliates	  	 	305,710	 	 	 	100,775	 	
Income tax expense	  	 	(89,038	)	 	 	(29,821	)	
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries	  	 	(35,807	)	 	 	(19,284	)	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	  	 	(107,758	)	 	 	(688	)	
Equity income of affiliates	  	 	17,740	 	 	 	18,008	 	
 	  				 				
Net income	  	 	90,847	 	 	 	68,990	 	
Preferred stock dividends	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(1,869	)	
 	  				 				
Net income applicable to common shares	  	$	90,847	 	 	$	67,121	 	
 	  				 				
Net income	  	$	90,847	 	 	$	68,990	 	
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	  	 	19,130	 	 	 	29,828	 	
 	  				 				
Comprehensive income	  	$	109,977	 	 	$	98,818	 	
 	  				 				
Net income per common share, basic and diluted	  	$	0.22	 	 	$	0.17	 	
 	  				 				
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	  	 	405,388	 	 	 	397,532	 	
 	  				 				
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	  	 	408,242	 	 	 	399,468	 	
 	  				 				
Cash dividends declared per common share	  	$	0.04	 	 	$	0.03	 	

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
 	  	Six Months Ended
June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands,
except per share)	 	
Revenues	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales—gold	  	$	1,438,582	 	 	$	1,091,750	 	
Sales—base metals, net	  	 	32,168	 	 	 	32,305	 	
Royalties	  	 	24,941	 	 	 	15,002	 	
 	  				 				
 	  	 	1,495,691	 	 	 	1,139,057	 	
 	  				 				
Costs and expenses	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	  	 	822,709	 	 	 	712,050	 	
Base metals	  	 	25,335	 	 	 	19,379	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	  	 	269,930	 	 	 	225,788	 	
Exploration and research	  	 	51,719	 	 	 	30,355	 	
General and administrative	  	 	57,702	 	 	 	48,967	 	
Write-down of long-lived assets	  	 	1,794	 	 	 	––  	 	
Other	  	 	24,473	 	 	 	(921	)	
 	  				 				
 	  	 	1,253,662	 	 	 	1,035,618	 	
 	  				 				
Other income (expense)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain on investments, net	  	 	84,337	 	 	 	47,298	 	
Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net	  	 	71,669	 	 	 	(3,147	)	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net	  	 	94,414	 	 	 	––  	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net	  	 	76,578	 	 	 	––  	 	
Loss on extinguishment of debt	  	 	(19,530	)	 	 	––  	 	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income	  	 	64,157	 	 	 	15,258	 	
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest of $3,048 and $2,294, respectively	  	 	(52,615	)	 	 	(66,238	)	
 	  				 				
 	  	 	319,010	 	 	 	(6,829	)	
 	  				 				
Pre-tax income before minority interest, equity (loss) income and impairment of affiliates and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	 	561,039	 	 	 	96,610	 	
Income tax expense	  	 	(151,601	)	 	 	(31,009	)	
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries	  	 	(73,596	)	 	 	(29,834	)	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	  	 	(119,485	)	 	 	(688	)	
Equity income of affiliates	  	 	26,278	 	 	 	19,412	 	
 	  				 				
Net income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	 	242,635	 	 	 	54,491	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax of $11,188 and $(4,147), respectively	  	 	(34,533	)	 	 	7,701	 	
 	  				 				
Net income	  	 	208,102	 	 	 	62,192	 	
Preferred stock dividends	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(3,738	)	
 	  				 				
Net income applicable to common shares	  	$	208,102	 	 	$	58,454	 	
 	  				 				
Net income	  	$	208,102	 	 	$	62,192	 	
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	  	 	60,159	 	 	 	57,706	 	
 	  				 				
Comprehensive income	  	$	268,261	 	 	$	119,898	 	
 	  				 				
Net income per common share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, basic	  	$	0.60	 	 	$	0.15	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle per common share, basic	  	 	(0.08	)	 	 	0.02	 	
 	  				 				
Net income per common share, basic	  	$	0.52	 	 	$	0.17	 	
 	  				 				
Net income per common share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, diluted	  	$	0.60	 	 	$	0.15	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle per common share, diluted	  	 	(0.09	)	 	 	0.02	 	
 	  				 				
Net income per common share, diluted	  	$	0.51	 	 	$	0.17	 	
 	  				 				
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	  	 	403,648	 	 	 	339,817	 	
 	  				 				
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	  	 	406,305	 	 	 	341,262	 	
 	  				 				
Cash dividends declared per common share	  	$	0.08	 	 	$	0.06	 	

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
3

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
 	  	June 30,
2003
	 	 	December 31,
2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	 	
ASSETS	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	  	$	274,741	 	 	$	401,683	 	
Marketable securities—short-term	  	 	12,030	 	 	 	13,188	 	
Accounts receivable	  	 	44,971	 	 	 	44,510	 	
Inventories	  	 	170,458	 	 	 	169,324	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	277,021	 	 	 	328,993	 	
Prepaid taxes	  	 	19,318	 	 	 	28,335	 	
Deferred stripping costs—short term	  	 	28,660	 	 	 	32,085	 	
Deferred income tax assets	  	 	53,482	 	 	 	51,451	 	
Newmont Australia infrastructure bonds	  	 	114,287	 	 	 	—  	 	
Other current assets	  	 	63,365	 	 	 	43,687	 	
 	  				 				
Current assets	  	 	1,058,333	 	 	 	1,113,256	 	
Property, plant and mine development, net	  	 	2,343,102	 	 	 	2,287,030	 	
Mineral interests and other intangible assets, net	  	 	1,405,066	 	 	 	1,415,348	 	
Investments	  	 	695,059	 	 	 	1,206,705	 	
Marketable securities—long-term	  	 	291,004	 	 	 	—  	 	
Deferred stripping costs—long term	  	 	39,336	 	 	 	23,302	 	
Long-term stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	282,537	 	 	 	199,761	 	
Deferred income tax assets	  	 	879,324	 	 	 	761,428	 	
Other long-term assets	  	 	89,208	 	 	 	123,112	 	
Goodwill	  	 	3,068,657	 	 	 	3,024,576	 	
 	  				 				
Total assets	  	$	10,151,626	 	 	$	10,154,518	 	
 	  				 				
LIABILITIES	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current portion of long-term debt	  	$	176,422	 	 	$	115,322	 	
Accounts payable	  	 	151,042	 	 	 	105,277	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities	  	 	9,171	 	 	 	28,469	 	
Derivative instruments	  	 	7,914	 	 	 	74,999	 	
Employee related benefits—short-term	  	 	117,196	 	 	 	100,936	 	
Other current liabilities	  	 	420,049	 	 	 	268,460	 	
 	  				 				
Current liabilities	  	 	881,794	 	 	 	693,463	 	
Long-term debt	  	 	1,277,166	 	 	 	1,701,282	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities	  	 	421,970	 	 	 	288,536	 	
Deferred revenue from sale of future production	  	 	53,841	 	 	 	53,841	 	
Derivative instruments	  	 	17,254	 	 	 	388,659	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities	  	 	742,237	 	 	 	656,452	 	
Employee related benefits—long-term	  	 	214,697	 	 	 	234,103	 	
Other long-term liabilities	  	 	379,677	 	 	 	364,376	 	
 	  				 				
Total liabilities	  	 	3,988,636	 	 	 	4,380,712	 	
 	  				 				
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Minority interest in subsidiaries	  	 	362,196	 	 	 	354,558	 	
 	  				 				
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Preferred stock—$5.00 par value;	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Authorized—5.0 million shares
Issued and outstanding—none	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	
Common stock—$1.60 par value;	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Authorized—750 million shares at each period end, respectively
Issued and outstanding—	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common: 362.1 million and 353.2 million shares issued, less 90 thousand and 9 thousand
treasury shares, respectively	  	 	579,733	 	 	 	565,019	 	
Exchangeable: 55.9 million shares, less 10 million and 7 million redeemed shares, respectively	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Additional paid-in capital	  	 	5,153,258	 	 	 	5,038,468	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	  	 	(3,867	)	 	 	(64,026	)	
Retained earnings (deficit)	  	 	71,670	 	 	 	(120,213	)	
 	  				 				
Total stockholders’ equity	  	 	5,800,794	 	 	 	5,419,248	 	
 	  				 				
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	  	$	10,151,626	 	 	$	10,154,518	 	

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
4

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
 
 	  	Six Months Ended
June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in
thousands)	 	
Operating activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	$	208,102	 	 	$	62,192	 	
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	  	 	269,930	 	 	 	225,788	 	
Accretion of accumulated reclamation obligations	  	 	11,320	 	 	 	––  	 	
Amortization of deferred stripping costs, net	  	 	(14,114	)	 	 	8,903	 	
Deferred income taxes	  	 	8,745	 	 	 	(10,403	)	
Foreign currency exchange (gain) loss	  	 	(34,019	)	 	 	10,504	 	
Minority interest, net of dividends	  	 	44,406	 	 	 	27,134	 	
Equity loss (income) and impairment of affiliates, net of dividends	  	 	99,309	 	 	 	(14,859	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	17,941	 	 	 	15,897	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax	  	 	34,533	 	 	 	(7,701	)	
Gain on investments, net	  	 	(84,337	)	 	 	(47,298	)	
Gain on gold commodity derivative instruments, net	  	 	(71,669	)	 	 	3,147	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net	  	 	(94,414	)	 	 	––  	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net	  	 	(76,578	)	 	 	––  	 	
Loss on extinguishment of debt	  	 	19,530	 	 	 	––  	 	
Gain on sale of assets and other	  	 	(11,027	)	 	 	(9,704	)	
(Increase) decrease in operating assets:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts receivable	  	 	8,000	 	 	 	14,413	 	
Inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	(25,574	)	 	 	(5,441	)	
Other assets	  	 	7,332	 	 	 	14,881	 	
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities	  	 	54,156	 	 	 	(46,473	)	
Derivative instruments	  	 	(12,935	)	 	 	––  	 	
Early settlement of derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges	  	 	(120,993	)	 	 	––  	 	
Other liabilities	  	 	(12,698	)	 	 	(42,896	)	
 	  				 				
Net cash provided by operating activities	  	 	224,946	 	 	 	198,084	 	
 	  				 				
Investing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Additions to property, plant and mine development	  	 	(215,301	)	 	 	(140,810	)	
Advances to joint ventures and affiliates, net	  	 	(46,203	)	 	 	(24,750	)	
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments	  	 	1,653	 	 	 	406,731	 	
Proceeds from the sale of TVX Newmont Americas	  	 	180,000	 	 	 	––  	 	
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities of Lihir	  	 	—  	 	 	 	84,002	 	
Proceeds from sale of cross currency swaps	  	 	—  	 	 	 	50,816	 	
Early settlement of ineffective derivative instruments	  	 	(29,148	)	 	 	––  	 	
Cash consideration for acquisition of Newmont NFM minority interest and other	  	 	(11,195	)	 	 	––  	 	
Cash consideration for the acquisition of Normandy and Franco-Nevada, net of cash received and transaction costs	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(87,885	)	
Proceeds from asset sales and other	  	 	988	 	 	 	19,888	 	
 	  				 				
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities	  	 	(119,206	)	 	 	307,992	 	
 	  				 				
Financing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Proceeds from long-term debt	  	 	115,000	 	 	 	489,131	 	
Repayment of long-term debt	  	 	(322,360	)	 	 	(911,817	)	
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock	  	 	(32,308	)	 	 	(25,871	)	
Proceeds from stock issuance and other	  	 	24,851	 	 	 	62,898	 	
Other	  	 	—  	 	 	 	(691	)	
 	  				 				
Net cash used in financing activities	  	 	(214,817	)	 	 	(386,350	)	
 	  				 				
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	  	 	(17,865	)	 	 	16,248	 	
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	  	 	(126,942	)	 	 	135,974	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	  	 	401,683	 	 	 	149,431	 	
 	  				 				
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	  	$	274,741	 	 	$	285,405	 	
 	  				 				
Supplemental information:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accrual for NYOL bond extinguishment	  	$	98,398	 	 	$	—  	 	
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized of $3,048 and $2,294, respectively	  	$	67,297	 	 	$	61,668	 	
Income taxes paid	  	$	110,467	 	 	$	45,700	 	
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
5

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
(1)    BASIS OF PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
The following interim Consolidated Financial Statements of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont” or the “Company”) are unaudited and prepared in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for Form 10-Q. Such rules and regulations allow the omission of certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as long as the statements are not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of these interim statements have been included. These adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except for the effects of the February 2002 acquisitions. These interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of Newmont included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2002.
 
The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to mineral reserves that are the basis for future cash flow estimates and units-of-production depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations; environmental, reclamation and closure obligations; estimates of recoverable gold and other minerals in stockpile and leach pads inventories; asset impairments (including impairments of goodwill, long-lived assets, and investments); write-downs of inventory to net realizable value; post-employment, post-retirement and other employee benefit liabilities; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets; reserves for contingencies and litigation; and the fair value and accounting treatment of financial instruments. The Company bases its estimates on the Company’s historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Accordingly, actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 
References to “A$” refer to Australian currency, “CDN$” to Canadian currency and “$” or “US$” to United States currency.
 
Certain amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and at December 31, 2002 have been reclassified to conform to 2003 presentation.
 
(2)    ACQUISITIONS
 
Newmont NFM Limited Scheme of Arrangement
 
On April 2, 2003, the shareholders of Normandy NFM Limited (an Australian corporation trading as “Newmont NFM” on the Australian Stock Exchange or “ASX”) voted to approve the proposed scheme of arrangement under which Newmont NFM would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Australia Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, through the acquisition of the remaining minority interest of Newmont NFM. The Federal Court in Sydney, Australia approved the scheme on April 11, 2003 and the scheme became effective on April 14, 2003 after the orders of the Federal Court were filed with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Under the terms of the scheme, Newmont NFM shareholders could receive 4.40 ASX listed Newmont Mining Corporation CHESS Depositary Interests (“CDIs”) for each Newmont NFM share. Each CDI is equivalent to 0.1 Newmont Mining Corporation common shares. As an alternative to receiving Newmont Mining Corporation CDIs, shareholders could sell their Newmont NFM shares back to the company under a concurrent buy-back offer of A$16.50 per Newmont NFM share. On April 29,
 
6

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
2003, Newmont Mining Corporation issued 4,437,506 common shares to CHESS Depository Nominees Pty Ltd, and in turn, 44,375,060 CDIs were issued to former Newmont NFM shareholders. The market value of the issued Newmont Mining Corporation shares was approximately $105 million, based on the average quoted value of the shares of $23.58 two days before and after November 28, 2002, the date the terms of the transaction were announced. The market value of the issued shares, together with the cash consideration paid to those shareholders who elected to accept the buy-back offer of approximately $10 million (including transaction costs), gave rise to a total purchase price of approximately $115 million. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase of minority interest in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 141 “Business Combinations” in the second quarter of 2003. Newmont NFM was delisted from the ASX in April 2003. Newmont has performed a preliminary purchase price allocation based on independent appraisals and valuations that gave rise to goodwill of $77.1 million. The final purchase price allocation is not expected to vary significantly from the preliminary allocation.
 
Normandy and Franco-Nevada
 
During the first quarter of 2002, Newmont acquired Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation Limited. (“Franco-Nevada”) and Normandy Mining Limited. (“Normandy”). The effective date for accounting purposes of the acquisitions was February 15, 2002. For more information on the acquisitions and the related purchase price allocation, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
 
For information purposes only, the following unaudited pro forma data reflects the consolidated results of operations of Newmont as if the acquisitions of Franco-Nevada and Normandy had taken place on January 1, 2002 (unaudited, in millions, except per share data):
 
 	  	Six Months
Ended
June 30, 2002
	 	
Revenues	  	$	1,368.8	 	
Net loss applicable to common shares before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	$	(77.6	)	
Net loss applicable to common shares	  	$	(69.9	)	
Basic and diluted loss per common share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	$	(0.20	)	
Basic and diluted loss per common share	  	$	(0.18	)	
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	  	 	394.1	 	
 
On a pro forma basis during the six months ended June 30, 2002, the net loss includes mark-to-market losses on derivative instruments totaling $166.9 million, net of tax. The above pro forma amounts do not include the application of hedge accounting prior to the acquisitions to significant portions of the acquired derivative instruments, as hedge accounting documentation was not in place during those periods. The pro forma information is not indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the acquisitions been consummated on January 1, 2002. The information is not indicative of the combined company’s future results of operations.
 
7

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Goodwill
 
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to reporting units during 2002 and for the first six months of 2003 are summarized in the following table (unaudited, in millions).
 
 	  	Nevada
	  	Other
North
America
	 	 	Total
North
America
	 	 	Yanacocha
	  	Other
South
America
	  	Total
South
America
	 	
Balance at January 1, 2002	  	$	—  	  	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	 —  	  	$	 	  	$	—  	 	
Purchase price allocation for Normandy and Franco-Nevada acquisitions	  	 	40.9	  	 	—  	 	 	 	40.9	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	
 	  			  				 				 			  			  				
Balance at December 31, 2002	  	 	40.9	  	 	—  	 	 	 	40.9	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	
Reversal of valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	
 	  			  				 				 			  			  				
Balance at March 31, 2003	  	 	40.9	  	 	—  	 	 	 	40.9	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	
Purchase price allocation for Newmont NFM Scheme of Arrangement	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	
Reversal of valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	
 	  			  				 				 			  			  				
Balance at June 30, 2003	  	$	40.9	  	$	—  	 	 	$	40.9	 	 	$	—  	  	$	 —  	  	$	—  	 	

 	  	Pajingo
	  	Other
Australia
	 	 	Total
Australia
	 	 	Zarafshan-
Newmont
	  	Other
International
Operations
	  	Total
Gold
	 	
Balance at January 1, 2002	  	$	—  	  	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	 	 	$	—  	  	$	—  	  	$	—  	 	
Purchase price allocation for Normandy and Franco-Nevada acquisitions	  	 	56.9	  	 	140.8	 	 	 	197.7	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	238.6	 	
 	  			  				 				 			  			  				
Balance at December 31, 2002	  	 	56.9	  	 	140.8	 	 	 	197.7	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	238.6	 	
Reversal of valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets	  	 	—  	  	 	(18.5	)	 	 	(18.5	)	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(18.5	)	
 	  			  				 				 			  			  				
Balance at March 31, 2003	  	 	56.9	  	 	122.3	 	 	 	179.2	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	220.1	 	
Purchase price allocation for Newmont NFM Scheme of Arrangement	  	 	—  	  	 	77.1	 	 	 	77.1	 	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	77.1	 	
Reversal of valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets	  	 	—  	  	 	(14.5	)	 	 	(14.5	)	 	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(14.5	)	
 	  			  				 				 			  			  				
Balance at June 30, 2003	  	$	56.9	  	$	184.9	 	 	$	241.8	 	 	$	—  	  	$	—  	  	$	282.7	 	

8

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	  	Base
Metals
	  	Exploration
	  	Merchant
Banking
	  	Corporate
and Other
	  	Consolidated
	 	
Balance at January 1, 2002	  	$	—  	  	$	—  	  	$	—  	  	$	 —  	  	$	—  	 	
Purchase price allocation for Normandy and Franco-Nevada acquisitions	  	 	31.5	  	 	1,129.5	  	 	1,625.0	  	 	—  	  	 	3,024.6	 	
 	  			  			  			  			  				
Balance at December 31, 2002	  	 	31.5	  	 	1,129.5	  	 	1,625.0	  	 	—  	  	 	3,024.6	 	
Reversal of valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(18.5	)	
 	  			  			  			  			  				
Balance at March 31, 2003	  	 	31.5	  	 	1,129.5	  	 	1,625.0	  	 	—  	  	 	3,006.1	 	
Purchase price allocation for Newmont NFM Scheme of Arrangement	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	77.1	 	
Reversal of valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	  	 	(14.5	)	
 	  			  			  			  			  				
Balance at June 30, 2003	  	$	31.5	  	$	1,129.5	  	$	1,625.0	  	$	—  	  	$	3,068.7	 	

During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company reversed valuation allowances for deferred tax assets related to capital loss carry-forwards in Australia due to capital gains generated by the sale of TVX Newmont Americas, the loss of tax attributes from the extinguishment of Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd (“NYOL”) bonds (see Note 10 for discussion) and from tax benefits arising from the completion of the Newmont NFM Scheme of Arrangement. The valuation allowances were originally recorded as part of the purchase price allocation for the acquisition of Normandy and were therefore reversed against goodwill.
 
(3)    INVENTORIES
 
 	  	At June 30,
2003
	  	At December 31,
2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Current:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
In-process	  	$	41,782	  	$	46,435	
Precious metals	  	 	23,923	  	 	19,467	
Materials and supplies	  	 	104,753	  	 	103,310	
Other	  	 	—  	  	 	112	
 	  			  			
 	  	$	170,458	  	$	169,324	

The Company recorded aggregate write-downs of $5.1 million and $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of inventories to net realizable value. Write-downs in 2003 included $0.8 million at Yanacocha, $0.3 million at Yandal, $0.5 million at Martha and $3.5 million at Golden Grove. Write-downs in 2002 related to $0.8 million at Nevada.
 
The Company recorded aggregate write-downs of $10.9 million and $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of inventories to net realizable value. Write-downs in 2003 include $0.8 million at Yanacocha, $1.0 million at Yandal, $1.3 million at Minahasa, $1.0 million at Martha and $6.8 million at Golden Grove. Write-downs in 2002 primarily related to $2.0 million at Nevada.
 
Inventory write-downs are classified as components of Costs applicable to sales .
 
9

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(4)    STOCKPILES AND ORE ON LEACH PADS
 
 	  	At June 30,
2003
	  	At December 31,
2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Current:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Stockpiles	  	$	92,129	  	$	104,997	
Ore on leach pads	  	 	184,892	  	 	223,996	
 	  			  			
 	  	$	277,021	  	$	328,993	
 	  			  			
Long-term:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Stockpiles	  	$	164,830	  	$	136,116	
Ore on leach pads	  	 	117,707	  	 	63,645	
 	  			  			
 	  	$	282,537	  	$	199,761	

Write-downs of inventories included in Costs applicable to sales totaled $5.1 million and $6.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of stockpiles to net realizable value. The 2003 stockpile write-downs included $1.4 million at Yandal, $2.1 million at Tanami, $1.0 million at Kalgoorlie, and $0.6 million at Martha. The 2002 stockpile write-downs primarily related to $6.6 million at Nevada.
 
Write-downs of inventories included in Costs applicable to sales totaled $6.8 million and $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of stockpiles to net realizable value. The Company also recorded a write-down in Nevada of $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to reduce the carrying value of ore on leach pads to net realizable value. Stockpile write-downs in 2003 include $0.8 million in Nevada, $1.4 million at Yandal, $2.1 million at Tanami, $1.0 million at Kalgoorlie and $1.5 million at Martha. $13.3 million of the stockpile write-downs in 2002 related to Nevada.
 
Stockpile and ore on leach pads write-downs are classified as components of Costs applicable to sales .
 
(5)    GAIN ON INVESTMENTS, NET
 
Gain on investment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:
 
 	  	Three months
ended June 30,
	  	Six months ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Gain on exchange of Echo Bay shares for Kinross marketable securities	  	$	 —  	  	$	—  	  	$	84,337	  	$	—  	
Gain on sale of marketable securities of Lihir Gold	  	 	—  	  	 	47,298	  	 	—  	  	 	47,298	
 	  			  			  			  			
Total	  	$	—  	  	$	47,298	  	$	84,337	  	$	47,298	

Kinross Gold Corporation
 
On January 31, 2003, Kinross Gold Corporation (“Kinross”), Echo Bay Mines Ltd. (“Echo Bay”) and TVX Gold Inc. (“TVX Gold”) were combined, and TVX Gold acquired Newmont’s 49.9% interest in the TVX Newmont Americas joint venture. Under the terms of the combination and acquisition, Newmont received a 13.8% interest in the restructured Kinross in exchange for its then 45.67% interest in Echo Bay and $180 million for its interest in TVX Newmont Americas. Cash proceeds of $170.6 million were received immediately after the
 
10

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
close of the transaction. The remaining $9.4 million, originally held in escrow, were received subsequent to the end of the first quarter. Newmont recognized a pre-tax gain of $84.3 million on the transaction in Gain on investments, net in the Statement of Consolidated Operations .
 
Newmont classifies its investment in Kinross as a long-term, available-for-sale marketable security. At June 30, 2003, the fair value of the Kinross investment was $291 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, a loss of $45.3 million, net of tax, was recorded in Other comprehensive income, net of tax for the change in market value of the investment. During the second quarter of 2003, a loss of $3.2 million, net of tax, was recorded in Other comprehensive income, net of tax for the change in market value of the investment. Newmont will continue to monitor the market value of its investment in Kinross Gold Corporation. In the event that the decline in the market value of the Kinross shares continues in future periods, the Company will evaluate the need to recognize a loss for an other-than-temporary decline in the value of the investment.
 
Gain on Sale of Marketable Securities of Lihir Gold
 
At March 31, 2002, the Company held a 9.74% interest in Lihir Gold, which was accounted for as an investment in marketable securities. During the three months ended March 31, 2002, unrealized holding gains of $11.0 million were recorded in Other comprehensive income, net of tax to reflect the market value increase during the period. On April 12, 2002, Newmont sold its equity holding in Lihir Gold through a block trade to Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Limited in Australia for approximately $84 million, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax gain of approximately $47.3 million in Gain on investments, net in the Statement of Consolidated Operations .
 
Sales of Debt Securities
 
As part of the Franco-Nevada acquisition in February 2002, the Company acquired significant investments in marketable debt securities. These debt securities are classified as available-for-sale and recorded at their fair values of $402.6 million under purchase accounting. All such securities were sold immediately after the Franco-Nevada acquisition for net proceeds of $402.9 million, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax gain of $0.3 million, which is included in Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange, and other income for the six months ended June 30, 2002.
 
(6)    DEFERRED STRIPPING COSTS
 
Movements in the deferred stripping cost balance were as follows:
 
 	  	Six months
ended
June 30,
2003
	 	 	Year ended
December 31,
2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	 	
Opening balance	  	$	55,387	 	 	$	91,631	 	
Additions	  	 	84,238	 	 	 	65,371	 	
Amortization	  	 	(71,629	)	 	 	(101,615	)	
 	  				 				
Closing balance	  	$	67,996	 	 	$	55,387	 	

11

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(7)    PROPERTY, PLANT AND MINE DEVELOPMENT
 
 	  	At June 30, 2003
	  	At December 31, 2002
	
 	  	Cost
	  	Accumulated
Depreciation and
Depletion
	 	 	Net Book
Value
	  	Cost
	  	Accumulated
Depreciation and
Depletion
	 	 	Net Book
Value
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Land	  	$	76,743	  	$	—  	 	 	$	76,743	  	$	71,521	  	$	—  	 	 	$	71,521	
Buildings and equipment	  	 	4,156,356	  	 	(2,583,915	)	 	 	1,572,441	  	 	4,093,028	  	 	(2,371,017	)	 	 	1,722,011	
Mine development	  	 	1,158,455	  	 	(670,688	)	 	 	487,767	  	 	1,005,166	  	 	(580,594	)	 	 	424,572	
Asset retirement cost	  	 	131,649	  	 	(69,332	)	 	 	62,317	  	 	—  	  	 	—  	 	 	 	—  	
Construction-in-progress	  	 	143,834	  	 	—  	 	 	 	143,834	  	 	68,926	  	 	—  	 	 	 	68,926	
 	  			  				 			  			  				 			
Total	  	$	5,667,037	  	$	(3,323,935	)	 	$	2,343,102	  	$	5,238,641	  	$	(2,951,611	)	 	$	2,287,030	
 	  			  				 			  			  				 			
Leased assets included above in property, plant and mine development	  	$	351,498	  	$	(153,600	)	 	$	197,898	  	$	361,889	  	$	(146,884	)	 	$	215,005	

12

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(8)    MINERAL INTERESTS AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
 
 	  	At June 30, 2003
	 	At December 31, 2002
	
 	  	Carrying
Value
	 	Accumulated
Amortization
	 	 	Net Book
Value
	 	Carrying
Value
	 	Accumulated
Amortization
	 	 	Net Book
Value
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Mineral Interests:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Production stage	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mineral interests	  	$	801,518	 	$	(373,726	)	 	$	427,792	 	$	712,098	 	$	(325,822	)	 	$	386,276	
Royalties—net smelter returns	  	 	223,684	 	 	(19,387	)	 	 	204,297	 	 	222,614	 	 	(12,751	)	 	 	209,863	
Royalties—net profit interest	  	 	18,290	 	 	(3,639	)	 	 	14,651	 	 	17,340	 	 	(3,231	)	 	 	14,109	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
 	  	 	1,043,492	 	 	(396,752	)	 	 	646,740	 	 	952,052	 	 	(341,804	)	 	 	610,248	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Development stage	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mineral interests	  	 	123,955	 	 	—	 	 	 	123,955	 	 	92,757	 	 	—	 	 	 	92,757	
Royalties—net smelter returns	  	 	1,542	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,542	 	 	1,321	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,321	
Royalties—net profit interest	  	 	6,911	 	 	(90	)	 	 	6,821	 	 	5,921	 	 	(50	)	 	 	5,871	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
 	  	 	132,408	 	 	(90	)	 	 	132,318	 	 	99,999	 	 	(50	)	 	 	99,949	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Exploration stage	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Mineral interests	  	 	548,433	 	 	(10,813	)	 	 	537,620	 	 	632,284	 	 	(8,449	)	 	 	623,835	
Royalties-net smelter returns	  	 	5,815	 	 	(351	)	 	 	5,464	 	 	5,700	 	 	(314	)	 	 	5,386	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
 	  	 	554,248	 	 	(11,164	)	 	 	543,084	 	 	637,984	 	 	(8,763	)	 	 	629,221	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Total mineral interests	  	 	1,730,148	 	 	(408,006	)	 	 	1,322,142	 	 	1,690,035	 	 	(350,617	)	 	 	1,339,418	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Oil and gas:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Producing property	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Royalties—net refining returns	  	 	44,293	 	 	(7,142	)	 	 	37,151	 	 	37,964	 	 	(3,842	)	 	 	34,122	
Working interest	  	 	21,510	 	 	(2,174	)	 	 	19,336	 	 	18,430	 	 	(1,400	)	 	 	17,030	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
 	  	 	65,803	 	 	(9,316	)	 	 	56,487	 	 	56,394	 	 	(5,242	)	 	 	51,152	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Non-producing property	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Royalties—net refining returns	  	 	5,545	 	 	—	 	 	 	5,545	 	 	4,751	 	 	—	 	 	 	4,751	
Working interest	  	 	8,280	 	 	—	 	 	 	8,280	 	 	7,090	 	 	—	 	 	 	7,090	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
 	  	 	13,825	 	 	—	 	 	 	13,825	 	 	11,841	 	 	—	 	 	 	11,841	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Total oil and gas	  	 	79,628	 	 	(9,316	)	 	 	70,312	 	 	68,235	 	 	(5,242	)	 	 	62,993	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Other	  	 	12,937	 	 	(325	)	 	 	12,612	 	 	12,937	 	 	—	 	 	 	12,937	
 	  			 				 			 			 				 			
Total	  	$	1,822,713	 	$	(417,647	)	 	$	1,405,066	 	$	1,771,207	 	$	(355,859	)	 	$	1,415,348	

The Company’s intangible assets for mineral interests and oil and gas interests are subject to amortization. The aggregate amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $39.6 million and $39.0 million, respectively. The aggregate amortization expense for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $61.1 million and $54.4 million, respectively.
 
13

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(9)    INVESTMENTS AND EQUITY INCOME OF AFFILIATES
 
Investments:
 
 	  	At
June 30,
2003
	  	At
December 31,
2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)
	
Investments in affiliates:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Batu Hijau	  	$	684,905	  	$	660,928	
TVX Newmont Americas	  	 	—	  	 	183,028	
Echo Bay Mines	  	 	—	  	 	210,643	
Australian Magnesium Corporation	  	 	—	  	 	44,244	
AGR Matthey Joint Venture	  	 	10,154	  	 	11,213	
 	  			  			
 	  	$	695,059	  	$	1,110,056	
 	  			  			
Other:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Newmont Australia infrastructure bonds—long-term	  	 	—	  	 	96,649	
 	  			  			
 	  	$	695,059	  	$	1,206,705	
 	  			  			
Other:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Newmont Australia infrastructure bonds—short-term	  	$	114,287	  	 	—	

Equity Loss and Impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation
 
 	  	Three months ended
June 30,
	 	 	Six months ended
June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	 	
Australian Magnesium Corporation	  	$	(107,758	)	 	$	(688	)	 	$	(119,485	)	 	$	(688	)	
 
Equity Income of Affiliates:
 
 	  	Three months ended
June 30,
	  	Six months ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Batu Hijau	  	$	18,397	 	 	$	13,533	  	$	25,750	 	 	$	14,937	
TVX Newmont Americas	  	 	—	 	 	 	3,892	  	 	810	 	 	 	3,892	
AGR Matthey Joint Venture	  	 	(657	)	 	 	583	  	 	(282	)	 	 	583	
 	  				 			  				 			
Total	  	$	17,740	 	 	$	18,008	  	$	26,278	 	 	$	19,412	

Investment in Batu Hijau
 
The Company and an affiliate of Sumitomo Corporation (“Sumitomo”) are partners with economic interests of 56.25% and 43.75%, respectively, in the Nusa Tenggara Partnership (“NTP”), which holds 80% of P.T. Newmont Nusa Tenggara (“PTNNT”), the owner of the Batu Hijau copper/gold mine in Indonesia. Due to the significant participating rights provided to Sumitomo under the terms of the NTP partnership agreement, the Company uses the equity method to account for its investment in NTP. The Company and Sumitomo have an indirect 45% and 35% interest, respectively, in PTNNT. The remaining 20% interest is held by an unrelated Indonesian company. Because the Company and Sumitomo have carried the investment of the 20% owner, the
 
14

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Company and Sumitomo recognize 56.25% and 43.75% of PTNNT’s net income (loss), respectively, until recouping the bulk of the construction investment, including interest. Under the Contract of Work, a portion of PTNNT not already owned by Indonesian nationals must be offered for sale to the Indonesian government or to Indonesian nationals, beginning in the sixth year after mining operations commenced. The effect of this provision could potentially reduce the Company and Sumitomo’s ownership to 49% by the end of the tenth year after mining operations commenced.
 
The Company’s equity investment in PTNNT was $684.9 million and $660.9 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. At June 30, 2003, differences between 56.25% of PTNNT’s net assets of $266.5 million and Newmont’s investment included (i) $45.2 million for Newmont’s contribution prior to the formation of NTP; (ii) $106.9 million for the fair market value adjustment recorded by Newmont in conjunction with the purchase of a subsidiary minority interest, net of amortization; (iii) $395.6 million for the contributions and interest income recorded by Newmont classified as debt and interest expense by PTNNT; (iv) negative $120.6 million for contributions to PTNNT, through NTP, by Sumitomo disproportionate to its equity interest, net of amounts recorded; (v) negative $76.9 million for stockholders’ equity of the carried interest partner; (vi) $38.6 million for other intercompany charges; (vii) $30.9 million for capitalized interest; and, (viii) negative $1.3 million for other adjustments recorded by Newmont. At December 31, 2002, differences between 56.25% of PTNNT’s net assets of $257.6 million and Newmont’s investment included (i) $45.2 million for Newmont’s contribution prior to the formation of NTP; (ii) $109.1 million for the fair market value adjustment recorded by Newmont in conjunction with the purchase of a subsidiary minority interest, net of amortization; (iii) $391.2 million for the contributions and interest income recorded by Newmont classified as debt and interest expense by PTNNT; (iv) negative $122.6 million for contributions in PTNNT, through NTP, by Sumitomo disproportionate to its equity interest, net of amounts recorded; (v) negative $76.9 million for stockholders’ equity of the carried interest partner; (vi) $33.3 million for other intercompany charges; (vii) $30.9 million for capitalized interest; and, (viii) negative $6.9 million for other adjustments recorded by Newmont. Certain of these amounts are amortized or depreciated on a units-of-production basis based on proven and probable reserves. Below is a description of Newmont’s equity income (loss) in PTNNT, where the net income (loss) reflects the elimination of interest between PTNNT and NTP.
 
Newmont’s equity income in PTNNT for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was $25.8 million versus $14.9 million for the same period in 2002. Newmont’s equity income for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was based on 56.25% of PTNNT’s net income of $16.0 million, adjusted for the elimination of $3.6 million of inter-company interest, $4.2 million of inter-company management fees, the cumulative effect of reclamation and remediation liabilities of $8.0 million and other adjustments of $1.0 million. For the comparable 2002 period, Newmont’s equity income was based on 56.25% of PTNNT’s net income of $7.4 million, adjusted for the elimination of $3.6 million of inter-company interest, $5.1 million of inter-company management fees, and other adjustments of $2.0 million.
 
On May 9, 2002, PTNNT completed a restructuring of its $1.0 billion project financing facility (Senior Debt) that provides PTNNT the ability to defer up to $173.5 million in principal payments scheduled for 2002 and 2003. The restructuring was expected to provide a better match between the expected cash flows of the project and the maturities of the debt. Any deferred principal amounts were to be repaid between 2004 and 2010. Under this restructuring, Batu Hijau is not permitted to pay dividends or make other restricted payments to Newmont or Sumitomo as long as any amount of deferred principal is outstanding; however, there is no restriction on prepaying any of the deferred principal amounts. Amounts outstanding under the project financing were $783.2 million at June 30, 2003 and $913.3 million in December 31, 2002. The amount of deferred principal at June 30, 2003 was $43.3 million and at December 31, 2002 was $173.4 million. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, PTNNT repaid $130.1 million of this facility all of which represented repayments
 
15

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
of the deferred principal. Newmont and its partner provide a contingent support line of credit to PTNNT. During the first half of 2003 and 2002, Newmont funded zero and $24.8 million, respectively under this contingent support facility as its pro-rata share of capital expenditures. Additional support from Newmont and its partner available under this facility amounts to $115.0 million, of which Newmont’s pro-rata share is $64.7 million.
 
The following is NTP summarized financial information based on accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The results of operations and assets and liabilities are not reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. As described earlier, the Company accounts for NTP as an equity investment.
 
 	  	Three months ended
June 30,
	  	Six months ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Revenues, net of smelting and refining costs	  	$	102,718	  	$	94,083	  	$	177,591	  	$	165,988	
Revenues from by-product sales credited to production costs	  	$	58,336	  	$	37,342	  	$	91,947	  	$	59,475	
Gross profit	  	$	40,271	  	$	13,384	  	$	50,426	  	$	9,058	
Net income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	$	25,528	  	$	13,181	  	$	31,488	  	$	8,751	
Net income	  	$	25,528	  	$	13,181	  	$	17,270	  	$	8,751	
 
In the six-month period ended June 30, 2003, NTP recorded a charge of $14.2 million to reflect the cumulative effect of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143 “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.”
 
 	  	At June 30,
2003
	  	At December 31,
2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
Current assets	  	$	254,748	  	$	313,110	
Property, plant and mine development, net	  	$	1,672,313	  	$	1,658,912	
Mineral interests	  	$	183,319	  	$	188,294	
Other assets	  	$	291,795	  	$	282,133	
Debt and related interest to partners and affiliates	  	$	261,640	  	$	259,793	
Other current liabilities	  	$	187,975	  	$	103,117	
Long-term debt—third parties (including current portion)	  	$	805,677	  	$	935,771	
Other liabilities	  	$	149,420	  	$	163,346	
 
For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, PTNNT recorded gross revenues, before smelting and refining costs, of $220 million and $212 million, respectively, which were subject to final pricing adjustments. The average price adjustment for copper was 2.38% and 5.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The average price adjustment for gold was 0.9% and 4.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. At June 30, 2003, PTNNT had copper derivatives embedded in outstanding shipment contracts of 74.9 million pounds of copper recorded at an average price of $0.74 per pound. A one-cent movement in the average price used for these derivatives will have an approximate $0.5 million impact on PTNNT’s 2003 net income.
 
By-product commodities, gold and silver, represented 57% and 40% of sales, net of smelting and refining charges, and reduced production costs by 79% and 57% for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and 52% and 36% of sales, net of smelting and refining charges, and reduced production costs by 71% and 49% for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
 
PTNNT entered into a series of copper hedging transactions in March 2002. At March 31, 2002, 23,400 metric tons of copper were hedged. These contracts were settled during the second quarter of 2002. These
 
16

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
contracts allowed PTNNT to realize an average price of $1,619 per metric ton (approximately $0.73 per pound). In second quarter 2003, PTNNT entered into copper forward sales contracts covering 5,000 metric tonnes per month for each of August and September 2003 at a weighted average fixed price between $1,665 and $1,725 per metric tonne. Each contract is settled by cash on a monthly basis. These contracts had a positive fair value as at June 30, 2003 of US$0.4 million (US$0.3 million net of tax).
 
In 2001, PTNNT entered into two diesel hedging contracts for 360,000 barrels each at a fixed price of $27.39 per barrel and $27.98 per barrel, respectively. Each of these contracts cover purchases of 15,000 barrels monthly and expire in August and September of 2003, respectively. Each contract is settled monthly. In December 2002, PTNNT entered into an additional hedge contract for 60,000 barrels over the following 12 months at a fixed price of $27.50 per barrel. These contracts have all been designated as cash flow hedges and the fair value at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 was $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively. At June 30, 2003, 140,000 barrels are outstanding for these contracts.
 
TVX Newmont Americas and Echo Bay Mines Ltd.
 
Newmont had a 49.9% interest and an equity investment of $183.0 million in TVX Newmont Americas joint venture at December 31, 2002. On January 31, 2003, Newmont sold its interest in TVX Newmont Americas for $180 million.
 
On January 31, 2003, Kinross, Echo Bay and TVX Gold were combined. Under the terms of the combination and acquisition, Newmont received a 13.8% interest in the restructured Kinross in exchange for its then 45.67% interest in Echo Bay. Newmont recorded a pre-tax gain on the transactions of $83.4 million (See Note 5).
 
Australian Magnesium Corporation (“AMC”)
 
At December 31, 2002, Newmont’s interest in AMC comprised a 22.8% equity and voting interest and a loan receivable in the amount of A$38 million (approximately $20.1 million) including interest capitalized since December 31, 2002. In addition, Newmont subsidiaries had obligations to contribute to AMC A$100 million in equity by January 31, 2003 and a further A$90 million in equity (reduced to A$75 million through a funding agreement reached in January 2003, though a condition required to bring the agreement into effect was not satisfied), contingent upon the Stanwell Magnesium Project not achieving certain specified production and operating criteria by December 2006. On January 3, 2003, Newmont purchased an additional 167 million shares at A$0.60 per share for a total of A$100 million (approximately $56.2 million) increasing its ownership to 40.9%, thereby satisfying its January 2003 equity contribution obligation. However, due to additional equity contributions by other shareholders on January 31, 2003, Newmont’s interest was decreased to 27.8%. As a result of this equity dilution in its interest in AMC, Newmont recorded an increase of $7.0 million to Additional paid-in-capital .
 
AMC’s primary asset is the Stanwell Magnesium Project (the “Project”), a proprietary chemical and dehydration process for producing anhydrous magnesium chloride as feed for an electrolytic cell to produce molten magnesium metal and magnesium alloys. The original funding arrangements for the Project amounted to approximately A$1.5 billion (approximately $1 billion), including contingencies and cost overrun reserves. Preliminary indications by AMC are that the project may now require A$150 million to A$200 million (approximately $100 million to $134 million) of funds in addition to the existing funding arrangements and potentially some form of third-party project financing support.
 
On April 17, 2003, AMC announced that it was unlikely that it would reach agreement with its independent engineering firm for a fixed price contract for the development of the Project. Following this announcement,
 
17

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
AMC’s share price declined substantially and was A$0.24 per share on May 8, 2003. As a result, Newmont wrote down the carrying value of its investment at March 31, 2003 to the quoted market price of the AMC shares at that date of $A0.43 per share and recorded a loss for an other-than-temporary decline in market value of $11 million.
 
On June 5, 2003, AMC requested suspension of its securities on the ASX. Subsequently, on June 12, 2003 AMC announced a restructuring agreement with the project’s major creditors including Newmont (the “Agreement”). The Agreement was designed to give AMC time to assess the Project development options and to search for either a corporate or project partner. Work on the Project has essentially ceased and the site is in a care and maintenance status. It is not known if or when the Project or any other magnesium project will be developed by AMC. In addition, as part of the Agreement, AMC (i) will settle outstanding obligations to its outside creditors from existing cash reserves, (ii) has cancelled the senior debt facilities associated with the Project and the associated foreign exchange and interest rate hedging contracts and (iii) has agreed to release Newmont from the above-mentioned A$90 million (approximately $60.1 million) contingent funding commitment. Newmont has agreed to forgive its A$38 million (approximately $24.8 million) loan receivable and provide support in the form of an A$10 million (approximately $6.6 million) contingent, subordinated credit facility and to maintain the existing guarantee in relation to the QMC finance facilities described below.
 
As a result of the agreement, Newmont recorded an additional write-down in the second quarter of $107.8 million reducing the carrying value of its investment in AMC to zero. The write-down is attributable to the following: (i) $72.7 million representing the book value of its investment at June 30, 2003, (ii) $24.8 million for the loan receivable from AMC, (iii) $10 million charge to settle Newmont’s guarantee of the Ford contract (see discussion below), (iv) $6.6 million relating to the contingent credit facility, and (v) $1.1 million for various other items offset by a $7.4 million income tax benefit.
 
Newmont had guaranteed a $30 million obligation payable by AMC to Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) in the event the Project did not meet certain specified production and operating criteria by November 2005. AMC indemnified Newmont for this obligation, but this indemnity was unsecured. As of June 30, 2003, Newmont and Ford agreed to settle the liability in relation to the guarantee for $10 million in exchange for a release of the guarantee. Newmont has agreed not to seek recovery of this amount from AMC.
 
Subsequent to June 30, 2003, Newmont’s ownership interest in AMC was further diluted to 26.9% (See Note 21, Subsequent Events).
 
Newmont is also the guarantor of an A$71 million (approximately $47 million) amortizing loan facility of AMC’s subsidiary, QMC Finance Pty Ltd (“QMC”), of which A$67.5 million (approximately $45.0 million) was outstanding as of June 30, 2003. The QMC loan facility, which is secured by the assets of the Queensland Magnesia Project, expires in November 2006.
 
QMC is also a party to hedging contracts, which have been guaranteed by Newmont. The contracts include a series of foreign exchange forward contracts and bought put options, the last of which expire in June 2006. As of June 30, 2003, the fair value of these contracts was a positive A$5.5 million (approximately $3.7 million).
 
The guarantees under the QMC loan facility and hedging contracts could be called in the event of a default by QMC. Newmont’s liability under QMC loan facility guarantee is limited to the total amount of outstanding borrowings under the facility at the time the guarantee is called. Newmont’s maximum potential liability under its guarantee of the QMC hedging contracts, however, would depend on the market value of the hedging contracts at the time the guarantee is called upon. The principal lender and counterparty under the QMC loan and hedging facilities also have a fixed and floating charge over certain assets of AMC. In the event the guarantees are called, Newmont would have a right of subrogation to the lender under Australian law.
 
18

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” on its investment in AMC and related entities, including QMC.
 
AGR Matthey Joint Venture
 
Newmont holds a 40% interest in a joint venture with the West Australian Mint and Johnson Matthey (Australia) Ltd. known as AGR Matthey Joint Venture (“AGR”). Newmont has no guarantees related to this investment. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, the difference between Newmont’s investment in AGR of $10.2 million ($11.2 million at December 31, 2002) and its share of AGR’s net assets consisted of a $2.4 million reduction in long-lived assets recorded by Newmont.
 
Newmont Australia Infrastructure Bonds
 
In June 1996, NP Finance Limited and GPS Finance Limited, wholly owned subsidiaries of Newmont Australia Limited (formerly Normandy), issued A$111.9 million (approximately $63.2 million) and A$21.9 million (approximately $12.4 million), respectively, of 7.906%, fifteen-year bonds at a premium to fund certain gas pipeline and power station projects. The bonds were issued at a premium due to unique tax-related benefits available to the bondholders and the issuer under Australian tax regulations. Interest is accrued and capitalized semi-annually in arrears in June and December of each year. Concurrently, with the issue of the Infrastructure Bonds described above, GMK Investments Pty Ltd (“GMKI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Newmont Australia Limited (formerly Normandy), entered into an offsetting transaction, making payments to Deutsche Bank Aktiengesellschaft (“DBA”) equal to the face value of the bonds in return for DBA agreeing to purchase the bonds from each holder of the bonds in June 2004 and to sell those bonds to GMKI for a nominal amount at that time. The receivable from DBA also accrues interest receivable at 7.906% and such interest is capitalized semi-annually in arrears in June and December of each year. Because the arrangement does not technically qualify as a defeasance of debt, the receivable is presented in Investments at December 31, 2002. As of June 30, 2003, Newmont reclassified this investment as a current asset and the corresponding debt liability to Current portion of long-term debt (see Note 11, Long-Term Debt) since, as stated above, DBA is obligated to repurchase these bonds from each holder in June 2004. The repurchase of these bonds will effectively retire the outstanding liability and satisfy the receivable.
 
(10)    EXTINGUISHMENT OF NYOL OBLIGATIONS
 
On May 29, 2003, Newmont made an offer through its wholly owned subsidiary, Yandal Bond Company Limited (“YBCL”) to acquire all of the outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes due in April 2008 of its wholly owned Australian subsidiary, NYOL. On May 28, 2003, YBCL made a separate offer to acquire all of NYOL’s gold hedge contracts from the counterparties. The offer to acquire the Senior Notes was at a price of $500 per $1,000 of principal amount. The offer to acquire the gold hedge contracts was at $0.50 per $1.00 of the net mark-to-market hedge liability as of May 22, 2003. As of June 30, 2003, YBCL had received binding tenders for the Senior Notes totaling $196.8 million, representing 83% of the total $237.2 million outstanding principal amount. Six of the total of seven counterparties to the gold hedge contracts, representing 94% of the gold ounces in the NYOL hedge book and 76% of the mark-to-market May 22, 2003 hedge liability, had assigned their hedge contracts to YBCL as of June 30, 2003. The transactions gave rise to a Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net of $94.4 million, net of transaction costs, and a Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net of $76.6 million, net of transaction costs. The cash payments of $98.4 million to settle the extinguishment of the bonds were accrued in Other current liabilities at June 30, 2003 and were made subsequent to that date. YBCL subsequently received additional binding tenders for a portion of the remaining outstanding Senior Notes and extended the offer deadline (see Note 21, Subsequent Events). 
 
19

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(11)    LONG-TERM DEBT
 
 	  	June 30,
2003
	 	 	December 31,
2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	 	
Sale-leaseback of refractory ore treatment plant	  	$	298,944	 	 	$	307,880	 	
8  3 / 8 % debentures, net of discount	  	 	182,696	 	 	 	204,658	 	
8  5 / 8 % notes, due May 2011, net of discount	  	 	222,234	 	 	 	274,339	 	
Newmont Australia 7  5 / 8 % notes, net of premium	  	 	121,027	 	 	 	152,690	 	
Newmont Australia 7  1 / 2 % notes, net of premium	  	 	91,400	 	 	 	101,850	 	
NYOL 8  7 / 8 % notes	  	 	40,435	 	 	 	237,220	 	
6% convertible subordinated debentures	  	 	99,980	 	 	 	99,980	 	
Medium-term notes	  	 	17,000	 	 	 	32,000	 	
Newmont Australia infrastructure bonds	  	 	116,933	 	 	 	99,680	 	
Prepaid forward sales obligation	  	 	145,000	 	 	 	145,000	 	
Revolving credit facility	  	 	19,000	 	 	 	—  	 	
Interest rate swaps	  	 	(8,086	)	 	 	(6,684	)	
Project financing, capital leases and other	  	 	107,025	 	 	 	167,991	 	
 	  				 				
 	  	 	1,453,588	 	 	 	1,816,604	 	
Current maturities	  	 	(176,422	)	 	 	(115,322	)	
 	  				 				
 	  	$	1,277,166	 	 	$	1,701,282	 	

Scheduled minimum long-term debt repayments are $23.6 million for the remainder of 2003, $177.4 million in 2004, $437.0 million in 2005, $109.8 million in 2006, $74.8 million in 2007 and $631.0 million thereafter.
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2003, the Company repurchased $23.0 million of 8  3 / 8 % debentures, $52.4 million of 8  5 / 8 % notes due in May 2011, $30.9 million of Newmont Australia 7  5 / 8 % notes and $10.0 million of Newmont Australia 7  1 / 2 % notes for total cash consideration of $135.8 million. As a result of these debt repurchases, the Company recognized a Loss on extinguishment of debt of $19.5 million.
 
In March 2002, Newmont, through an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, YBCL, made an offer to repurchase any and all of the outstanding 8  7 / 8 % Senior Notes due 2008 of NYOL. As of the offer date, $300 million principal amount of notes was outstanding. The transaction resulted in redemption of $62.8 million of the outstanding notes at 101% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest as of the repurchase date.
 
On May 27, 2003, Newmont Mining Corporation initiated an offer through YBCL to acquire all of the outstanding 8  7 / 8 % Senior Notes due April 2008 issued by NYOL (see Note 10, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations). At June 30, 2003, YBCL had acquired $196.8 million through this offer.
 
Newmont has extended its offer to acquire the remaining NYOL 8  7 / 8 % Senior Notes and acquired amounts subsequent to June 30, 2003. NYOL also entered into Voluntary Administration (“VA,” a form of insolvency proceeding in Australia) subsequent to June 30, 2003 (see Note 21, Subsequent Events).
 
(12)    RECLAMATION AND REMEDIATION
 
The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing
 
20

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements.
 
Effective January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143 “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” As a result, Reclamation and remediation liabilities increased by $120.7 million for the fair value of the estimated asset retirement obligations, Other accrued liabilities increased by $2.3 million for worker participation bonuses in Peru (bonuses required by law at Minera Yanacocha based on net income), Deferred income tax assets increased by $6.9 million, Property, plant and mine development, net increased by $69.1 million, Minority interest in subsidiaries decreased by $16.2 million and a $34.5 million loss was recorded for the Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, $379.8 million and $254.1 million, respectively, were accrued for reclamation obligations relating to currently or recently producing mineral properties.
 
In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former, primarily historic, mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, $62.5 million and $48.1 million were accrued for such obligations These amounts are also included in Reclamation and remediation liabilities .
 
The following is a reconciliation of the total liability for asset retirement obligations (unaudited, in thousands):
 
Balance December 31, 2002	  	$	302,229	 	
Impact of adoption of SFAS No. 143	  	 	120,707	 	
Additions to liabilities	  	 	21,460	 	
Liabilities settled	  	 	(13,396	)	
Accretion expense	  	 	11,320	 	
Revisions	  	 	—  	 	
 	  				
Balance June 30, 2003	  	$	442,320	 	

The current portions of Reclamation and remediation liabilities of $20.3 million and $13.7 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, are included in Other accrued liabilities .
 
On a pro forma basis, the liabilities for asset retirement obligations would have been $420.0 million and $422.9 million at January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2002, respectively, if SFAS No. 143 had been applied at the beginning of 2002.
 
There were no assets that were legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations at June 30, 2003.
 
21

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
The table below presents the impact of the accounting change for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and the pro forma effect for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 as if the change had been in effect for that period (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data):
 
 	  	Three months ended
June 30,
	 	 	Six months ended
June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	 	 	 	(pro forma)	 	 	 	 	 	(pro forma)	 	
Increase/(decrease) to net income	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	  	$	4,815	 	 	$	1,752	 	 	$	10,112	 	 	$	1,905	 	
Base metals	  	 	89	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	179	 	 	 	—	 	
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization	  	 	(3,420	)	 	 	(3,307	)	 	 	(6,833	)	 	 	(6,614	)	
Income tax (expense) benefit	  	 	(519	)	 	 	544	 	 	 	(1,210	)	 	 	1,648	 	
Minority interest	  	 	(995	)	 	 	577	 	 	 	(1,953	)	 	 	1,204	 	
Equity loss of affiliate	  	 	(319	)	 	 	(201	)	 	 	(799	)	 	 	(541	)	
 	  				 				 				 				
Net loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	$	(349	)	 	$	(635	)	 	$	(504	)	 	$	(2,398	)	
 	  				 				 				 				
Net loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle per common share, basic and diluted	  	$	0.00	 	 	$	0.00	 	 	$	0.00	 	 	$	(0.01	)	

The table below presents pro forma net income and earnings per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 as if the Company had adopted the SFAS No. 143 as of January 1, 2002 (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data):
 
 	  	Three months ended
June 30, 2002
	  	Six months ended
June 30, 2002
	 	
 	  	Net income
applicable to
common shares
	 	 	Income per share
	  	Net income
applicable to
common shares
	 	 	Income per share
	 	
As reported	  	$	67,121	 	 	 	0.17	  	$	50,753	 	 	$	0.15	 	
Change in accounting method SFAS No. 143	  	 	(635	)	 	 	—	  	 	(2,398	)	 	 	(0.01	)	
 	  				 			  				 				
Pro forma	  	$	66,486	 	 	$	0.17	  	$	48,355	 	 	$	0.14	 	

(13)    SALES CONTRACTS, COMMODITY AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
 
Newmont has a “no hedging” philosophy and generally sells its gold production at market prices. Newmont has, on a limited basis, entered into derivative contracts to protect the selling price for certain anticipated gold production and to manage risks associated with sales contracts, commodities, interest rates and foreign currency. In addition, at the time of Normandy’s acquisition, three of its affiliates had a substantial derivative instrument position. These three affiliates are now known as Newmont Gold Treasury Pty Ltd., Newmont NFM and NYOL. Newmont is not required to place collateral with respect to its commodity instruments and there are no margin calls associated with such contracts. A number of NYOL’s hedging positions pertaining to one counterparty are governed by agreements that confer on the relevant counterparties a right to terminate the position prior to its agreed scheduled maturity date. Such a termination would result in an immediate cash settlement of that contract based on the contract’s market value on the date of termination. Exercise of termination rights may result in a cash settlement obligation to NYOL hedge counterparties in excess of funds available to NYOL. NYOL obligations, however, are non-recourse to Newmont and its other subsidiaries.
 
22

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Gold Commodity Contracts
 
The tables below are expressed in thousands of ounces of gold, and prices for contracts denominated in A$ have been translated to US$ at the exchange rate at June 30, 2003 of US$0.67 per A$1.
 
On May 28, 2003, YBCL offered to acquire all of the gold hedge obligations owed by NYOL from the counterparties (see Note 10, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations). The offer included two alternatives: the counterparties could elect to receive $0.50 for each dollar of net mark-to-market liability under their individual hedge contracts, as calculated by YBCL as of May 22, 2003; or, in lieu of cash, the counterparties could elect to assign all such contracts with NYOL to YBCL and enter into new hedging contracts with Newmont, such that Newmont would assume obligations equivalent to an undivided 40% of NYOL’s existing hedge obligations with such counterparty.
 
At the close of the offer YBCL had acceptances from six of the seven gold hedge book counterparties. All of the six counterparties elected to receive $0.50 for each dollar of net mark-to-market liability, as calculated by YBCL as of May 22, 2003. This resulted in a total cash payment from YBCL to the counterparties of approximately $77 million. A gain of $76.6 million was recorded in Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net due to the extinguishment of the hedge book liability for the six NYOL hedge counterparties who accepted the offer.
 
NYOL was placed into VA on July 3, 2003 and deconsolidated from the Newmont group as of that date (see Note 21, Subsequent Events). Accordingly, the Company has reclassified to earnings as of June 30, 2003, $542,000 of Accumulated other comprehensive income (“OCI”) related to hedged forecasted sales designated against NYOL’s production scheduled to occur during the period ending September 30, 2003 (the period through which NYOL is expected to remain in VA). No similar reclassification has been made with respect to the amounts in OCI associated with sales expected to occur after September 30, 2003, as the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that those forecasted transactions will occur since the Company expects to regain control of NYOL or its assets by October 1, 2003. Accordingly, the balance deferred in OCI as of June 30, 2003 (a gain of approximately $43.8 million, net of taxes) relating to hedge contracts designated against forecasted sales of NYOL’s production beyond September 30, 2003, will continue to be deferred in OCI. The Company will continue to assess the probability of its regaining control of NYOL and making any necessary adjustments to the balance of OCI in future periods, if required.
 
For the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, gains of $8.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively, were included in income in Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net for the ineffective portion of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, and a gain of $8.5 million and a loss of $10.8 million, respectively, for the change in fair value of gold commodity contracts that do not qualify as hedges. For the half year ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, gains of $31.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively, were included in income in Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net for the ineffective portion of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, and a gain of $40.6 million and a loss of $9.0 million, respectively, for the change in fair value of gold commodity contracts that do not qualify as hedges. The amount anticipated to be reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), to income for derivative instruments during the next 12 months is a gain of approximately $18.7 million. The maximum period over which hedged forecasted transactions are expected to occur is five years.
 
23

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Gold Forward Sales Contracts
 
Newmont had no gold forward sales contracts outstanding at June 30, 2003 (unaudited), although positions existed at December 31, 2002. The fair values of these contracts at December 31, 2002 were as follows:
 
Gold Forward Contracts
	  	 	 	
(A$ denominated)	  	US $ (000)	 	
Fixed Forwards	  	$	(138,095	)	
Floating Rate Forwards	  	 	(37,401	)	
Synthetic Forwards	  	 	(34,222	)	
 	  				
Total:	  	$	(209,718	)	

Gold Put Option Contracts
 
Newmont had the following gold put option contracts at June 30, 2003 (unaudited):
 
 	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Fair Value
	 	
Put Option Contracts:
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  	Total/
Average
	  	June 30,
2003
	 	 	December 31,
2002
	 	
 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	US$ (000)	 	
US$ Denominated Fixed Purchased Puts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	105	  	 	203	  	 	205	  	 	100	  	 	20	  	 	—	  	 	633	  	$	(7,591	)	 	$	(6,773	)	
Average price	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	338	  	$	397	  	$	 —	  	$	303	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
A$ Denominated Fixed Purchased Puts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	(3,690	)	
Average price	  	 	––	  	 	––	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
A$ Denominated Floating Forward Purchased Puts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	(12,140	)	
Average price	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	 	 	 	 	 	
Total:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  				 				
Ounces	  	 	105	  	 	203	  	 	205	  	 	100	  	 	20	  	 	—	  	 	633	  	$	(7,591	)	 	$	(22,603	)	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  				 				
Average price	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	338	  	$	397	  	$	—	  	$	303	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

Note:    Through December 31, 2002, the floating forward purchased put option contracts were accounted for as cash flow hedges as they were statistically proven to qualify as highly effective cash flow hedges through that date. However, due to changes in market conditions during the first quarter of 2003, these contracts were no longer considered highly effective cash flow hedges. The effect of this change was gains of $5.3 million and $10.7 million that were recorded in Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net in income during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively.

24

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Convertible Put Options and Other Instruments
 
Newmont had the following gold convertible put option contracts and other instruments outstanding at June 30, 2003 (unaudited):
 
 	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Fair Value
	 	
Convertible Put Options
and Other Instruments
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  	Total/
Average
	  	June 30,
2003
	 	 	December 31,
2002
	 	
(A$ denominated)	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	US$ (000)	 	
Floating Convertible Put Options:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	(102,952	)	
Average price	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	 	 	 	 	 	
Knock-out/knock-in Contracts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	(6,794	)	
Average price	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	 	 	 	 	 	
Indexed Forward Contracts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	33	  	 	65	  	 	65	  	 	32	  	 	195	  	$	(4,937	)	 	$	(15,740	)	
Average price	  	$	 —	  	$	 —	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  				 				
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	33	  	 	65	  	 	65	  	 	32	  	 	195	  	$	(4,937	)	 	$	(125,486	)	
 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  				 				
Average price	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 
Sold Convertible Put Options
 
Newmont had no sold convertible put option contracts outstanding at June 30, 2003, although a position did exist at December 31, 2002. The fair value of the position at December 31, 2002 was positive $14.3 million.
 
Sold Put Options
 
Newmont had no sold put option contracts outstanding at June 30, 2003 or December 31, 2002. A sold put position was created during the first quarter of 2003 and was closed out as part of the YBCL transaction during the second quarter (see Note 10, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations ).
 
Price-Capped Sales Contracts
 
Newmont had the following price-capped forward sales contracts outstanding at June 30, 2003 (unaudited):
 
 	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Fair Value
	
Price-capped Contracts:
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  	Total/
Average
	  	June 30,
2003
	  	December 31,
2002
	
(US$ Denominated)	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	US$ (000)	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	500	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	1,850	  	 	2,350	  	N/A	  	N/A	
Average price	  	$	 —	  	$	 —	  	$	350	  	$	 —	  	$	 —	  	$	384	  	$	377	  	 	  	 	

Note:    The fair value of the price-capped sales contracts of $53.9 million was recorded as deferred revenue in September 2001 and will be included in sales revenue as delivery occurs in 2005 through 2011. The forward sales contracts are accounted for as normal sales contracts under SFAS No. 133 “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.”
 
25

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
US$/Gold Swap Contracts
 
Newmont Australia entered into a US$/gold swap contract whereby principal payments on US$ bonds are swapped into gold-denominated payments of 600,000 ounces in 2008. Newmont Australia also receives US$ fixed interest payments and pays gold lease rates, which are indexed to market rates. This instrument was marked to market at each period end, with the change reflected in income up until the contract was closed out during the YBCL buy back transaction (see Note 10, Extinguishment NYOL Obligations). However, the indexed portion of the transaction was held with the one counterparty who did not take up the offer. As such this portion of the transaction continues to be marked-to-market at each period end, with the change reflected in income. As at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 the instrument had a negative fair value of $6.2 million and $47.8 million, respectively.
 
Other Sales Contracts, Commodity and Derivative Instruments
 
Foreign Currency Contracts
 
Newmont acquired certain currency swap contracts in the Normandy transaction intended to hedge the currency risk on repayment of US$-denominated debt. These contracts were closed out during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 for net proceeds of $50.8 million. The contracts were accounted for on a mark-to-market basis until closed out, resulting in a loss of $10.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002.
 
Newmont also acquired currency swap contracts to receive A$ and pay US$ designated as hedges of A$ denominated debt. The A$-denominated debt was repaid during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and the contracts are currently undesignated. The contracts are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 they had a negative fair value of $2.7 million and $21.9 million, respectively.
 
Interest Rate Swap Contracts
 
During the last half of 2001, Newmont entered into contracts to hedge the interest rate risk exposure on a portion of its $275 million 8.625% notes and its $200 million 8.375% debentures. Newmont receives fixed-rate interest payments at 8.625% and 8.375% and pays floating-rate interest amounts based on periodic LIBOR settings plus a spread, ranging from 2.60% to 4.25%. The notional principal amount of these transactions (representing the amount of principal tied to floating interest rate exposure) was $200 million at both June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. Half of these contracts expire in July 2005 and half expire in May 2011. For the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, these transactions resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $1.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and $3.6 million ad $2.9 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. These transactions have been designated as fair value hedges and had a fair value of $21.1 million and $13.8 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
 
26

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(14)    STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
 	  	Three Months Ended
June 30,
	 	 	Six Months Ended
June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	 	
Net income	  	$	90,847	 	 	$	68,990	 	 	$	208,102	 	 	$	62,192	 	
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sale of marketable securities of Lihir, net of tax $17,053 and $10,732, respectively	  	 	––	 	 	 	(29,036	)	 	 	––	 	 	 	(18,273	)	
Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable equity securities, net of tax of $678, $(1,071), $12,655 and $(1,163), respectively	  	 	(3,307	)	 	 	2,499	 	 	 	(49,068	)	 	 	2,714	 	
Foreign currency translation adjustments	  	 	26,146	 	 	 	17,288	 	 	 	32,109	 	 	 	18,125	 	
Changes in fair value of cash flow hedge instruments, net of tax of $1,589, $(16,747), $(20,441) and $(23,631), respectively	  	 	(3,709	)	 	 	39,077	 	 	 	72,546	 	 	 	55,140	 	
Exchange of Echo Bay shares for Kinross shares	  	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	4,572	 	 	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax	  	 	19,130	 	 	 	29,828	 	 	 	60,159	 	 	 	57,706	 	
 	  				 				 				 				
Comprehensive income	  	$	109,977	 	 	$	98,818	 	 	$	268,261	 	 	$	119,898	 	

(15)    DIVIDENDS, INTEREST INCOME, FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE AND OTHER INCOME
 
 	  	Three Months Ended
June 30,
	 	 	Six Months Ended
June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	 	 	2003
	  	2002
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	 	
Interest income	  	$	2,815	  	$	5,102	 	 	$	5,020	  	$	7,898	 	
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses)	  	 	27,178	  	 	6,144	 	 	 	51,884	  	 	(1,482	)	
Gain on sale of exploration properties	  	 	189	  	 	4,649	 	 	 	1,462	  	 	6,402	 	
Other	  	 	2,136	  	 	(1,052	)	 	 	5,791	  	 	2,440	 	
 	  			  				 			  				
Total	  	$	32,318	  	$	14,843	 	 	$	64,157	  	$	15,258	 	

(16)    ACCOUNTING CHANGES
 
Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization
 
During the third quarter of 2002, Newmont changed its accounting policy, retroactive to January 1, 2002, with respect to depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of Property, plant and mine development to exclude future estimated development costs expected to be incurred for certain underground operations. Previously, the Company had included these costs and associated reserves in its DD&A calculations at certain of its underground mining operations. In addition, the Company further revised its policy such that costs incurred to access specific ore blocks or areas that only provide benefit over the life of that area are depreciated, depleted or amortized over the reserves associated with the specific ore area. These changes were made to better match DD&A with the associated ounces of gold sold and to remove the inherent uncertainty in estimating future development costs in arriving at DD&A rates. The cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle through December 31, 2001 increased net income during the six months ended June 30, 2003 by $7.7 million, net of tax of $4.1 million, and earnings per common share, basic and diluted, by $0.02 per share.
 
27

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Reclamation and Remediation
 
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 143, which established uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. The statement was adopted as required on January 1, 2003. See Note 12, Reclamation and Remediation, for complete disclosure of the impact of adopting SFAS 143. 
 
(17)    SEGMENT INFORMATION
 
Financial information relating to Newmont’s segments is as follows:
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003
(Unaudited, in millions)
 
 	 	North America
	 	 	South America
	 	Australia
	 	
 	 	Nevada
	 	 	Other
North
America
	 	 	Total
North
America
	 	 	Yanacocha
	 	Other
South
America
	 	Total
South
America
	 	Pajingo
	 	Other
Australia
	 	 	Total
Australia
	 	
Sales, net	 	$	185.6	 	 	$	35.7	 	 	$	221.3	 	 	$	231.7	 	$	19.2	 	$	250.9	 	$	32.7	 	$	160.3	 	 	$	193.0	 	
Gain on investments, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Gain on extinguishment of debt and other obligations, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Royalties	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Interest income	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.1	 	$	—	 	$	0.1	 	$	—	 	$	2.3	 	 	$	2.3	 	
Interest expense	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	1.0	 	$	0.1	 	$	1.1	 	$	—	 	$	5.4	 	 	$	5.4	 	
Exploration and research expense	 	$	5.5	 	 	$	––	 	 	$	5.5	 	 	$	3.7	 	$	0.1	 	$	3.8	 	$	1.2	 	$	2.1	 	 	$	3.3	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	$	34.7	 	 	$	8.0	 	 	$	42.7	 	 	$	40.4	 	$	1.8	 	$	42.2	 	$	6.9	 	$	20.5	 	 	$	27.4	 	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect	 	$	6.3	 	 	$	2.4	 	 	$	8.7	 	 	$	101.0	 	$	5.3	 	$	106.3	 	$	12.0	 	$	6.0	 	 	$	18.0	 	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	(0.7	)	 	$	(0.7	)	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, net of tax	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	 	$	(5.4	)	 	$	(0.2	)	 	$	(5.6	)	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	0.1	 	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.2	 	$	—	 	$	1.2	 	$	—	 	$	0.6	 	 	$	0.6	 	
Capital expenditures	 	$	29.6	 	 	$	1.8	 	 	$	31.4	 	 	$	60.6	 	$	0.1	 	$	60.7	 	$	4.8	 	$	14.1	 	 	$	18.9	 	
Deferred stripping costs	 	$	49.4	 	 	$	6.6	 	 	$	56.0	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	9.2	 	 	$	9.2	 	
Total assets	 	$	1,539.2	 	 	$	142.0	 	 	$	1,681.2	 	 	$	1,208.0	 	$	27.5	 	$	1,235.5	 	$	178.4	 	$	1,591.1	 	 	$	1,769.5	 	
 
28

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2003
(Unaudited, in millions)
 
 	 	Zarafshan-
Newmont,
Uzbekistan
	 	Other
International
Operations
	 	 	Total
Gold
	 	 	Base
Metals
	 	 	Exploration
	 	 	Merchant
Banking
	 	Corporate
and Other
	 	 	Consolidated
	 	
Sales, net	 	$	21.4	 	$	37.4	 	 	$	724.0	 	 	$	12.8	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	736.8	 	
Gain on investments, net	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Gain on extinguishment of debt and other obligations, net	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	171.0	 	$	—	 	 	$	171.0	 	
Royalties	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	10.4	 	$	—	 	 	$	10.4	 	
Interest income	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	2.4	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	0.4	 	 	$	2.8	 	
Interest expense	 	$	0.2	 	$	—	 	 	$	6.8	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	15.9	 	 	$	22.7	 	
Exploration and research expense	 	$	—	 	$	2.1	 	 	$	14.7	 	 	$	1.0	 	 	$	8.3	 	 	$	—	 	$	6.2	 	 	$	30.2	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	$	2.9	 	$	8.1	 	 	$	123.3	 	 	$	6.7	 	 	$	0.9	 	 	$	5.6	 	$	2.8	 	 	$	139.3	 	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect	 	$	9.0	 	$	4.8	 	 	$	146.8	 	 	$	(5.1	)	 	$	(9.7	)	 	$	175.1	 	$	(1.4	)	 	$	305.7	 	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	 	$	 	 	$	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	$	 	 	$	(107.8	)	 	$	(107.8	)	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	(0.7	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	18.4	 	 	$	17.7	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, net of tax	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	 	$	—	 	$	(2.2	)	 	$	(7.7	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	(7.7	)	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.8	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.8	 	
Capital expenditures	 	$	0.2	 	$	6.1	 	 	$	117.3	 	 	$	3.6	 	 	$	8.9	 	 	$	—	 	$	4.2	 	 	$	134.0	 	
Deferred stripping costs	 	$	—	 	$	2.8	 	 	$	68.0	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	68.0	 	
Total assets	 	$	101.7	 	$	189.9	 	 	$	4,983.1	 	 	$	244.2	 	 	$	1,217.4	 	 	$	2,279.6	 	$	1,427.3	 	 	$	10,151.6	 	
 
Newmont has made corrections for certain misclassifications resulting from clerical errors that existed in the disclosure of Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect by segment for the three months ended June 30, 2003; the corrections resulted in an increase of $2.3 million in the Other Australia segment and a decrease of $2.3 million in the Corporate and Other category.
 
29

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Three Months Ended June 30, 2002
(Unaudited, in millions)
 
 	 	North America
	 	South America
	 	Australia
	
 	 	Nevada
	 	 	Other
North
America
	 	 	Total
North
America
	 	Yanacocha
	 	Other
South
America
	 	Total
South
America
	 	Pajingo
	 	Other
Australia
	 	Total
Australia
	
Sales, net	 	$	186.6	 	 	$	40.9	 	 	$	227.5	 	$	149.0	 	$	23.5	 	$	172.5	 	$	23.1	 	$	129.7	 	$	152.8	
Gain on investments, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	
Royalties	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	––	 	$	––	
Interest income	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	0.1	 	$	—	 	$	0.1	 	$	0.2	 	$	4.0	 	$	4.2	
Interest expense	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	2.5	 	$	0.1	 	$	2.6	 	$	—	 	$	10.0	 	$	10.0	
Exploration and research expense	 	$	3.9	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	3.9	 	$	2.5	 	$	0.2	 	$	2.7	 	$	0.4	 	$	2.5	 	$	2.9	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	$	25.2	 	 	$	9.1	 	 	$	34.3	 	$	26.2	 	$	3.8	 	$	30.0	 	$	6.4	 	$	23.3	 	$	29.7	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect	 	$	(0.1	)	 	$	7.7	 	 	$	7.6	 	$	47.7	 	$	8.2	 	$	55.9	 	$	10.1	 	$	7.5	 	$	17.6	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	3.1	 	$	3.1	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	 	$	3.2	 	 	$	(0.3	)	 	$	2.9	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	$	7.4	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	7.4	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	0.1	 	$	0.1	
Capital expenditures	 	$	12.0	 	 	$	3.7	 	 	$	15.7	 	$	43.3	 	$	0.4	 	$	43.7	 	$	3.6	 	$	16.3	 	$	19.9	
Deferred stripping costs	 	$	76.6	 	 	$	6.1	 	 	$	82.7	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	
Total assets	 	$	1,895.7	 	 	$	175.8	 	 	$	2,071.5	 	$	1,089.6	 	$	41.4	 	$	1,131.0	 	$	209.8	 	$	2,121.9	 	$	2,331.7	
 
 	  	Zarafshan-
Newmont,
Uzbekistan
	  	Other
International
Operations
	  	Total
Gold
	  	Base
Metals
	  	Exploration
	 	 	Merchant
Banking
	  	Corporate
and Other
	 	 	Consolidated
	
Sales, net	  	$	22.2	  	$	34.6	  	$	609.6	  	$	22.9	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	632.5	
Gain on investments, net	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	47.3	  	$	—	 	 	$	47.3	
Royalties	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	––	  	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	11.2	  	$	––	 	 	$	11.2	
Interest income	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	4.3	  	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	0.3	  	$	0.5	 	 	$	5.1	
Interest expense	  	$	0.2	  	$	—	  	$	12.8	  	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	  	$	22.3	 	 	$	35.1	
Exploration and research expense	  	$	—	  	$	0.6	  	$	10.1	  	$	1.1	  	$	4.0	 	 	$	—	  	$	3.6	 	 	$	18.8	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	  	$	3.1	  	$	10.6	  	$	107.7	  	$	6.7	  	$	2.0	 	 	$	6.0	  	$	1.2	 	 	$	123.6	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect	  	$	9.1	  	$	6.6	  	$	96.8	  	$	7.8	  	$	(5.9	)	 	$	52.2	  	$	(50.1	)	 	$	100.8	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	3.1	  	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	1.2	  	$	13.0	 	 	$	17.3	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	2.9	  	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	2.9	
Write-down of long-lived assets	  	$	—	  	$	––	  	$	7.5	  	$	0.1	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	7.6	
Capital expenditures	  	$	0.8	  	$	5.1	  	$	85.2	  	$	2.5	  	$	0.0	 	 	$	0.6	  	$	0.7	 	 	$	89.0	
Deferred stripping costs	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	82.7	  	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	  	$	—	 	 	$	82.7	
Total assets	  	$	105.1	  	$	530.1	  	$	6,169.4	  	$	488.9	  	$	226.6	 	 	$	2,073.9	  	$	878.7	 	 	$	9,837.5	
 
Newmont has made corrections for certain misclassifications resulting from clerical errors that existed in the disclosure of Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect by segment for the three months ended June 30, 2002; the corrections resulted in a decrease of $47.3 million in the Corporate and Other category and an increase of $47.3 million in the Merchant Banking segment.
 
30

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
(Unaudited, in millions)
 
 	 	North America
	 	 	South America
	 	 	Australia
	 	
 	 	Nevada
	 	 	Other
North
America
	 	 	Total
North
America
	 	 	Yanacocha
	 	 	Other
South
America
	 	 	Total
South
America
	 	 	Pajingo
	 	Other
Australia
	 	 	Total
Australia
	 	
Sales, net	 	$	406.6	 	 	$	76.0	 	 	$	482.6	 	 	$	461.2	 	 	$	39.9	 	 	$	501.1	 	 	$	58.5	 	$	284.9	 	 	$	343.4	 	
Gain on investments, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Gain on extinguishment of debt and other obligations, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	 	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Royalties	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Interest income	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.5	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.5	 	 	$	—	 	$	3.6	 	 	$	3.6	 	
Interest expense	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	2.4	 	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	2.5	 	 	$	—	 	$	14.3	 	 	$	14.3	 	
Exploration and research expense	 	$	8.8	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	8.8	 	 	$	5.6	 	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	1.5	 	$	3.5	 	 	$	5.0	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	$	66.3	 	 	$	18.2	 	 	$	84.5	 	 	$	75.9	 	 	$	3.9	 	 	$	79.8	 	 	$	12.5	 	$	40.3	 	 	$	52.8	 	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	 	$	43.7	 	 	$	5.4	 	 	$	49.1	 	 	$	205.1	 	 	$	11.0	 	 	$	216.1	 	 	$	23.1	 	$	2.5	 	 	$	25.6	 	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Equity income of affiliates	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	0.5	 	 	$	0.5	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, net of tax	 	$	(14.4	)	 	$	(3.4	)	 	$	(17.8	)	 	$	(32.4	)	 	$	(0.2	)	 	$	(32.6	)	 	$	0.8	 	$	(1.1	)	 	$	(0.3	)	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	 	$	(12.0	)	 	$	(0.3	)	 	$	(12.3	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	(0.9	)	 	$	(0.9	)	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.2	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.2	 	 	$	—	 	$	0.6	 	 	$	0.6	 	
Capital expenditures	 	$	50.0	 	 	$	2.2	 	 	$	52.2	 	 	$	96.0	 	 	$	0.6	 	 	$	96.6	 	 	$	6.4	 	$	24.2	 	 	$	30.6	 	
Deferred stripping costs	 	$	49.4	 	 	$	6.6	 	 	$	56.0	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	9.2	 	 	$	9.2	 	
Total assets	 	$	1,539.2	 	 	$	142.0	 	 	$	1,681.2	 	 	$	1,208.0	 	 	$	27.5	 	 	$	1,235.5	 	 	$	178.4	 	$	1,591.1	 	 	$	1,769.5	 	
 
 	 	Zarafshan-
Newmont,
Uzbekistan
	 	 	Other
International
Operations
	 	 	Total
Gold
	 	 	Base
Metals
	 	 	Exploration
	 	 	Merchant
Banking
	 	Corporate
and Other
	 	 	Consolidated
	 	
Sales, net	 	$	42.6	 	 	$	68.9	 	 	$	1,438.6	 	 	$	32.2	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	1,470.8	 	
Gain on investments, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	84.3	 	$	—	 	 	$	84.3	 	
Gain on extinguishment of debt and other obligations, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	151.5	 	$	—	 	 	$	151.5	 	
Royalties	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	24.9	 	$	—	 	 	$	24.9	 	
Interest income	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	4.1	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.1	 	$	0.8	 	 	$	5.0	 	
Interest expense	 	$	0.4	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	17.3	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	35.3	 	 	$	52.6	 	
Exploration and research expense	 	$	—	 	 	$	3.9	 	 	$	23.4	 	 	$	1.7	 	 	$	15.7	 	 	$	—	 	$	10.9	 	 	$	51.7	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	$	5.5	 	 	$	15.3	 	 	$	237.9	 	 	$	13.8	 	 	$	1.7	 	 	$	10.3	 	$	6.2	 	 	$	269.9	 	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	 	$	18.8	 	 	$	7.0	 	 	$	316.6	 	 	$	(8.9	)	 	$	(17.8	)	 	$	248.6	 	$	22.5	 	 	$	561.0	 	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	(119.5	)	 	$	(119.5	)	
Equity income of affiliates	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.5	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	25.8	 	 	$	26.3	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, net of tax	 	$	(1.3	)	 	$	(3.2	)	 	$	(55.2	)	 	$	(0.2	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	20.9	 	 	$	(34.5	)	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	(0.9	)	 	$	(14.1	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	(14.1	)	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.8	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.8	 	
Capital expenditures	 	$	0.7	 	 	$	12.4	 	 	$	192.5	 	 	$	5.8	 	 	$	9.0	 	 	$	—	 	$	8.0	 	 	$	215.3	 	
Deferred stripping costs	 	$	—	 	 	$	2.8	 	 	$	68.0	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	68.0	 	
Total assets	 	$	101.7	 	 	$	189.9	 	 	$	4,983.1	 	 	$	244.2	 	 	$	1,217.4	 	 	$	2,279.6	 	$	1,427.3	 	 	$	10,151.6	 	
 
Newmont has made corrections for certain misclassifications resulting from clerical errors that existed in the disclosure of Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2003; the corrections resulted in increases of $7.6 million and $9.9 million for the Nevada and Other Australia segments, respectively, and a decrease of $17.5 million in the Corporate and Other category.
 
31

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
(Unaudited, in millions)
 
 	 	North America
	 	South America
	 	Australia
	 	
 	 	Nevada
	 	 	Other
North
America
	 	 	Total
North
America
	 	Yanacocha
	 	Other
South
America
	 	Total
South
America
	 	Pajingo
	 	 	Other
Australia
	 	 	Total
Australia
	 	
Sales, net	 	$	362.9	 	 	$	76.5	 	 	$	439.4	 	$	289.2	 	$	43.4	 	$	332.6	 	$	39.9	 	 	$	185.9	 	 	$	225.8	 	
Gain on investments, net	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Royalties	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Interest income	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	0.2	 	$	—	 	$	0.2	 	$	0.4	 	 	$	5.4	 	 	$	5.8	 	
Interest expense	 	$	0.1	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.1	 	$	5.4	 	$	0.2	 	$	5.6	 	$	0.2	 	 	$	15.9	 	 	$	16.1	 	
Exploration and research expense	 	$	6.3	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	6.3	 	$	4.3	 	$	0.6	 	$	4.9	 	$	0.6	 	 	$	3.1	 	 	$	3.7	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	$	52.0	 	 	$	17.7	 	 	$	69.7	 	$	61.2	 	$	6.9	 	$	68.1	 	$	9.9	 	 	$	35.3	 	 	$	45.2	 	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	 	$	(9.0	)	 	$	10.1	 	 	$	1.1	 	$	75.4	 	$	13.1	 	$	88.5	 	$	17.9	 	 	$	(3.8	)	 	$	14.1	 	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	3.1	 	 	$	3.1	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal, net of tax	 	$	0.9	 	 	$	7.2	 	 	$	8.1	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	(0.4	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	(0.4	)	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	 	$	9.5	 	 	$	(0.6	)	 	$	8.9	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	 	15.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	15.3	 	 	—	 	 	––	 	 	—	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	0.3	 	
Capital expenditures	 	$	20.7	 	 	$	6.9	 	 	$	27.6	 	$	69.7	 	$	0.6	 	$	70.3	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	21.6	 	 	$	27.3	 	
Deferred stripping costs	 	$	76.6	 	 	$	6.1	 	 	$	82.7	 	$	—	 	$	––	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Total assets	 	$	1,895.7	 	 	$	175.8	 	 	$	2,071.5	 	$	1,089.6	 	$	41.4	 	$	1,131.0	 	$	209.8	 	 	$	2,121.9	 	 	$	2,331.7	 	
 
 	 	Zarafshan-
Newmont,
Uzbekistan
	 	Other
International
Operations
	 	Total
Gold
	 	Base
Metals
	 	Exploration
	 	 	Merchant
Banking
	 	Corporate
and Other
	 	 	Consolidated
	
Sales, net	 	$	37.4	 	$	56.6	 	$	1,091.8	 	$	32.3	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	1,124.1	
Gain on investments, net	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	47.3	 	$	—	 	 	$	47.3	
Royalties	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	15.0	 	$	—	 	 	$	15.0	
Interest income	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	6.0	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	1.1	 	$	0.8	 	 	$	7.9	
Interest expense	 	$	0.3	 	$	—	 	$	22.1	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	44.1	 	 	$	66.2	
Exploration and research expense	 	$	—	 	$	0.6	 	$	15.5	 	$	1.2	 	$	7.4	 	 	$	—	 	$	6.3	 	 	$	30.4	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	$	5.4	 	$	16.0	 	$	204.4	 	$	7.0	 	$	3.5	 	 	$	8.2	 	$	2.7	 	 	$	225.8	
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect	 	$	14.5	 	$	8.9	 	$	127.1	 	$	6.2	 	$	(10.8	)	 	$	53.1	 	$	(79.0	)	 	$	96.6	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	3.1	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	0.7	 	$	14.9	 	 	$	18.7	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principal,	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
net of tax	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	7.7	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	7.7	
Amortization of deferred stripping, net	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	8.9	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	8.9	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	15.6	 	$	0.3	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	15.9	
Capital expenditures	 	$	2.7	 	$	5.9	 	$	133.8	 	$	4.1	 	$	0.2	 	 	$	0.6	 	$	2.1	 	 	$	140.8	
Deferred stripping costs	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	$	82.7	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	$	—	 	 	$	82.7	
Total assets	 	$	105.1	 	$	530.1	 	$	6,169.4	 	$	488.9	 	$	226.6	 	 	$	2,073.9	 	$	878.7	 	 	$	9,837.5	
 
Newmont has made corrections for certain misclassifications resulting from clerical errors that existed in the disclosure of Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect by segment for the six months ended June 30, 2002; the corrections resulted a decrease of $47.3 million in the Corporate and Other category and an increase of $47.3 million in the Merchant Banking segment.
 
32

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(18)    COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
 
General
 
The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” in determining its accruals and disclosures with respect to loss contingencies. Accordingly, estimated losses from loss contingencies are accrued by a charge to income when information available prior to issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. If a loss contingency is not probable or reasonably estimable, disclosure of the loss contingency is made in the financial statements when it as at least reasonably possible that a loss may be incurred.
 
Operating Segments
 
The Company’s operating segments are identified in Note 17. Except as noted in this paragraph, all of the Company’s commitments and contingencies specifically described in this Note 18 relate to the Corporate and Other category. The Newmont Madencilik A.S. matters are related to the Other International operating segment. The Nevada Operations matters under Newmont USA Limited are related to the Nevada operating segment. The Minera Yanacocha matters are related to the Yanacocha operating segment. The Yandal Gold Pty Ltd. and the Newmont Australia Limited matters are related to the Other Australia operating segment.
 
Environmental
 
The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. At June 30, 2003 and at December 31, 2002, $379.8 million and $254.1 million, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently producing mineral properties. On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS 143, “Asset Retirements Obligations” (see Accounting Changes).
 
In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. The Company believes that the related environmental obligations associated with these sites are similar in nature with respect to the development of remediation plans, their risk profile and the compliance required to meet general environmental standards. Based upon the Company’s best estimate of its liability for these matters, $62.5 million and $48.1 million were accrued for such obligations at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. These amounts are included in Other accrued liabilities and Reclamation and remediation . Depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the liability for these matters could be as much as 49% greater or 32% lower than the amount accrued at June 30, 2003. The amounts accrued for these matters are reviewed periodically based upon facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes in estimates are charged to Costs and expenses, Other in the period estimates are revised.
 
Details about certain of the more significant sites involved are discussed below.
 
Battle Mountain Resources, Inc.—100% Newmont Owned
 
San Luis, Colorado:     The San Luis open-pit gold mine in southern Colorado was operated by Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. and ceased operations in November 1996. Since then, substantial closure and reclamation work has been performed. In August 1999, the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (“CDPHE”) issued a  
 
33

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
notice of violation of the Water Quality Control Act and in October 1999 amended the notice to authorize operation of a water treatment facility and the discharge of treated water. Battle Mountain Resources has made all submittals required by the CDPHE notice and conducted the required response activities. Battle Mountain Resources negotiated a settlement with CDPHE resolving alleged violations that became effective September 1, 2000. In October 2000, the CDPHE received an “Application for Reconsideration of Order for Civil Penalty” filed by project opponents, seeking to appeal the terms of the settlement. The application was denied by CDPHE. Project opponents filed a judicial appeal in the District Court for Costilla County, Colorado, and Battle Mountain Resources intervened to protect its interest in the settlement. In May 2002 this matter was resolved and the settlement was upheld in favor of CDPHE and Battle Mountain Resources.
 
Dawn Mining Company LLC (“Dawn”)—51% Newmont Owned
 
Midnite Mine Site :    Dawn previously leased an open-pit uranium mine, currently inactive, on the Spokane Indian Reservation in the State of Washington. The mine site is subject to regulation by agencies of the U.S. Department of Interior (the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Land Management), as well as the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”).
 
In 1991, Dawn’s mining lease at the mine was terminated. As a result, Dawn was required to file a formal mine closure and reclamation plan. The Department of Interior commenced an analysis of Dawn’s proposed plan and alternate closure and reclamation plans for the mine. Work on this analysis has been suspended indefinitely. In mid-2000, the mine was included on the National Priorities List under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”). In March 2003, the EPA notified Dawn and Newmont that it had thus far expended $11.5 million on the remedial investigation/feasibility study under CERCLA.
 
The EPA has asserted that Dawn and Newmont are liable for reclamation or remediation work and costs at the mine. Dawn does not have sufficient funds to pay for the reclamation plan it proposed or for any alternate plan, or for any additional remediation work or costs at the mine. Newmont intends to vigorously contest any claims as to its liability.
 
Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of any future action against Dawn or Newmont arising from this matter.
 
Dawn Mill:     Dawn also owns a uranium mill site facility, located on private land near Ford, Washington, which is subject to state and federal regulation. In late 1999, Dawn sought state approval for a revised mill closure plan that, if implemented, would expedite the reclamation process at the mill. The State of Washington has approved this revised plan. The currently approved plan for the mill is secured by a $14.1 million bond, which is guaranteed by Newmont.
 
Idarado Mining Company (“Idarado”)—80.1% Newmont Owned
 
Telluride and Ouray, Colorado:     In July 1992, Newmont and Idarado signed a consent decree with the State of Colorado (“State”), which was agreed to by the U.S. District Court of Colorado to settle a lawsuit brought by the State under CERCLA.
 
Idarado agreed in the consent decree to undertake specified remediation work at its former mining site in the Telluride/Ouray area of Colorado. Remediation work at this property is substantially complete. If the remediation does not achieve specific performance objectives defined in the consent decree, the State may require Idarado to implement supplemental activities at the site, also as defined in the consent decree. Idarado and Newmont have obtained a $5.8 million reclamation bond to secure their potential obligations under the consent decree. In
 
34

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
addition, Idarado settled natural resources damages and past and future response costs, and agreed to habitat enhancement work under the consent decree. All of this work is substantially completed.
 
Newmont Madencilik A.S.—100% Newmont Owned
 
The Ovacik mine has a long history of legal challenges to the operation of the mine and, in particular, its use of cyanide in gold production. These challenges involve a multitude of proceedings and have a complex procedural history that, in June 2001, resulted in a judicial order granting the plaintiffs’ request to cancel Ovacik’s operating permits. Newmont has appealed this decision and, at present, the mine continues to operate under interim licenses pending the outcome of Newmont’s appeal. In addition, the Ovacik mine is the subject of a separate action being brought against the Turkish government in the European Court of Human Rights (“ECHR”). The plaintiffs in that case assert that the Turkish government’s authorization of operating permits and use of cyanide for the Ovacik mine violates Turkish law and Turkey’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. Plaintiffs have asked, among other things, that the ECHR grant interim relief ordering the shutdown of the mine pending the ECHR’s hearing and decision on the merits. Newmont has intervened in this action. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the final outcome of any of the above-described legal proceedings. Either the Turkish courts or the ECHR, however, might grant relief that could require the closure of the mine or the interruption of mining activities.
 
Newmont Capital Limited—100% Newmont Owned
 
Lava Cap Mine Site :    In February 1999, EPA placed the Lava Cap mine site in Nevada County, California on the National Priorities List under CERCLA. The EPA then initiated a remedial investigation/feasibility study under CERCLA to determine environmental conditions and remediation options at the site.
 
Newmont Capital owned the property for approximately three years from 1984 to 1986 but never mined or conducted exploration at the site. The EPA asserts that Newmont Capital is responsible for clean up costs incurred at the site. Newmont Capital has sought to resolve this matter through a de minimis settlement with EPA. The parties have entered into a tolling agreement until December 31, 2003 to facilitate settlement negotiations with respect to potential claims under CERCLA. Based on Newmont Capital’s limited involvement at Lava Cap mine, it does not believe it has any liability for environmental conditions at the site, and intends to vigorously defend any formal claims by the EPA. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of any future action against it arising from this matter.
 
Newmont USA Limited—100% Newmont Owned
 
Pinal Creek :    Newmont is a defendant in a lawsuit brought in U.S. District Court in Arizona by the Pinal Creek Group, alleging that the company and others are responsible for some portion of costs incurred to address groundwater contamination emanating from copper mining operations located in the area of Globe and Miami, Arizona. Two former subsidiaries of Newmont, Pinto Valley Copper Corporation and Magma Copper Company (now known as BHP Copper Inc.), owned some of the mines in the area between 1983 and 1987. The court has dismissed plaintiffs’ claims seeking to hold Newmont liable for the acts or omissions of its former subsidiaries. Based on information presently available, Newmont believes it has strong defenses to plaintiffs’ remaining claims, including, without limitation, that Newmont’s agents did not participate in any pollution causing activities; that Newmont’s liabilities, if any, were contractually transferred to one of the plaintiffs; that portions of plaintiffs’ claimed damages are not recoverable; and that Newmont’s equitable share of liability, if any, would be immaterial to Newmont. While Newmont has denied liability and is vigorously defending these claims, we cannot reasonably predict the final outcome of this lawsuit.
 
35

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Nevada Operations :    In November 2002, Great Basin Mine Watch and the Mineral Policy Center (Appellants) filed suit in U.S. District Court in Nevada against the Department of the Interior and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), challenging and seeking to enjoin the BLM’s July 2002 Record of Decision approving the company’s amended Plan of Operations covering the Gold Quarry South Layback Project, and the BLM’s September 2002 Record of Decision approving a new Plan of Operations for the company’s proposed Leeville Mine. Appellants seek a declaration that the BLM’s decisions were unlawful and an injunction prohibiting Newmont’s approved activities. Newmont has intervened in this action on behalf of the government defendants and has filed an answer denying all of Appellants’ claims. While Newmont believes that this appeal is without merit, an unfavorable outcome could result in additional conditions on operations that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
In October 2002, Great Basin Mine Watch (Appellant) filed an appeal with the Nevada State Environmental Commission, challenging the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection’s (NDEP) renewal of the Clean Water Act discharge permit for Newmont’s Gold Quarry Mine. This permit governs the conditions under which Newmont may discharge mine-dewatering water in connection with its ongoing mining operations. Appellant alleges that the terms of the renewed permit violate the Clean Water Act and Nevada water quality laws. Newmont has intervened in this action on behalf of the NDEP. A hearing before the Nevada State Environmental Commission was held in June 2003 in Elko, Nevada. At the end of the hearing, the Commission ruled in favor of NDEP on all claims and affirmed NDEP’s renewal of the Clean Water Act discharge permit. It is unclear at this time whether Great Basin Mine Watch will appeal this decision. While Newmont believes that this appeal is without merit, an unfavorable outcome could result in additional conditions on operations that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s financial position or results of operations.
 
In December 2002, Great Basin Mine Watch filed an appeal with the Nevada State Environmental Commission challenging NDEP’s November 2002 decision renewing a water pollution control permit for Newmont’s Lone Tree Mine. This appeal alleges that NDEP’s renewal violated various procedural and substantive requirements under Nevada’s water quality laws. Newmont has intervened in this appeal. A hearing before the Nevada State Environmental Commission was held on February 25-26, 2003 in Carson City, Nevada. At the close of the hearing, the Commission ruled in favor of NDEP on all claims, and affirmed NDEP’s renewal of the permit. Great Basin Mine Watch appealed this decision in the Nevada District Court in Carson City.
 
Gray Eagle Mine Site :    By letter dated September 3, 2002, the EPA notified Newmont that the EPA had expended $2.6 million in response costs to address environmental conditions associated with a historic tailings pile located at the Grey Eagle Mine site near Happy Camp, California, and requested that Newmont pay those costs. The EPA has identified four potentially responsible parties, including Newmont. Newmont does not believe it has any liability for environmental conditions at the Grey Eagle Mine site, and intends to vigorously defend any formal claims by the EPA. Newmont cannot reasonably predict the likelihood or outcome of any future action against it arising from this matter.
 
Resurrection Mining Company (“Resurrection”)—100% Newmont Owned
 
Leadville, Colorado :    Newmont, Resurrection and other defendants were named in lawsuits filed by the State of Colorado under CERCLA in 1983, which were subsequently consolidated with a lawsuit filed by EPA in 1986. These proceedings sought to compel the defendants to remediate the impacts of pre-existing, historic mining activities near Leadville, Colorado, which date back to the mid-1800s, and which the government agencies claim are causing substantial environmental problems in the area.
 
In 1988 and 1989, the EPA issued administrative orders with respect to one area on the site and the defendants have collectively implemented those orders by constructing a water treatment plant, which was placed
 
36

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
in operation in early 1992. Remaining remedial work for this area primarily consists of water treatment plant operation and continuing environmental monitoring and maintenance activities. Newmont and Resurrection are currently responsible for 50% of these costs, but their share of such costs could increase in the event other defendants become unable to pay their share of such costs.
 
The parties also have entered into a consent decree with respect to the remaining areas at the site, which apportions liabilities and responsibilities for these areas. The EPA has approved remedial actions for selected components of Resurrection’s portion of the site, which were initiated in 1995. The EPA has not yet selected the final remedy for the site. Accordingly, Newmont cannot yet determine the full extent or cost of its share of the remedial action that will be required. The government agencies may also seek to recover for damages to natural resources. In March 1999, the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (“MOU”) to facilitate the settlement of natural resources damages claims under CERCLA for the upper Arkansas River Basin. The MOU provides a structure for evaluation of damages and possible restoration activities that may be required if it is concluded such damages have occurred.
 
Other Legal Matters
 
Newmont USA Limited—100% Newmont Owned
 
Peru :    In February 2002, a French citizen filed a complaint against the Company and certain of its subsidiaries and former officers, Compañia de Minas Buenaventura, S.A.A. (“Buenaventura”), one of Buenaventura’s subsidiaries, and other individuals, in U.S. District Court in Denver. The plaintiff alleges that he had an arrangement with Normandy Mining Limited, under which his fee was dependent on the outcome of the Minera Yanacocha shareholder dispute (which was resolved in 2000 pursuant to a comprehensive settlement agreement among the parties). The suit alleges that the defendants violated the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), and a parallel Colorado statute, by corrupting the Peruvian Supreme Court in 1998. Various common law torts including conspiracy, defamation, and tortuous interference with beneficial economic interests are also alleged. The suit seeks damages of not less than $25 million plus interest (which could be subject to trebling), as well as unspecified punitive damages. A motion to dismiss this lawsuit is currently pending before the Court, and the Company is and will continue to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.
 
Minera Yanacocha—51.35% Newmont Owned
 
Choropampa:     In June 2000, a transport contractor of Minera Yanacocha spilled approximately 151 kilograms of elemental mercury near the town of Choropampa, Peru, which is located 53 miles (85 kilometers) southwest of the mine. Elemental mercury is a byproduct of gold mining and was sold to a Lima firm for use in medical instruments and industrial applications. A comprehensive health and environmental remediation program was undertaken by Minera Yanacocha in response to the incident. In August 2000, Minera Yanacocha paid under protest a fine of 1,740,000 soles (approximately $500,000) to the Peruvian government. Mineral Yanacocha has entered into settlement agreements with a number of individuals impacted by the incident. In addition, it has entered into agreements with three of the communities impacted by this incident to provide a variety of public works as compensation for the disruption and inconvenience caused by the incident.
 
On September 10, 2001, Mineral Yanacocha, various wholly owned subsidiaries of Newmont, and other defendants were named in a lawsuit filed by over 900 Peruvian citizens in Denver District Court for the State of Colorado. This action seeks compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the elemental mercury spill incident. The Denver District Court dismissed this action on May 22, 2002, and the court reaffirmed this ruling on July 30, 2002. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have appealed this dismissal.
 
37

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
In July 2002, other lawsuits were served against Minera Yanacocha, various wholly owned subsidiaries of Newmont and/or other defendants in the Denver District Court for the State of Colorado and in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, by approximately 140 additional Peruvian plaintiffs and by the same plaintiffs who filed the September 2001 lawsuit. These actions also seek compensatory and punitive damages based on claims associated with the elemental mercury spill incident. All of these lawsuits have been stayed pending the outcome of the appeal in the September 2001 matter.
 
Additional lawsuits relating to the Choropampa incident were filed against Minera Yanacocha in two of the local courts of Cajamarca, Peru, in May 2002 by over 900 Peruvian citizens. A significant number of the plaintiffs in these lawsuits previously have entered into settlement agreements with Minera Yanacocha. The two courts issued opposite rulings on the validity of these agreements. Resolution of the matter is now pending before a higher court.
 
Neither Newmont nor Minera Yanacocha can reasonably predict the final outcome of any of the above-described lawsuits.
 
Cerro Quilish:     Minera Yanacocha is involved in a dispute with the Provincial Municipality of Cajamarca regarding the authority of that governmental body to regulate the development of the Cerro Quilish ore deposit (which contains reserves of 1.9 million equity ounces). Cerro Quilish is located in the same watershed in which the City of Cajamarca is located. The Municipality has enacted an ordinance declaring Cerro Quilish and its watershed to be a reserved and natural protected area. Minera Yanacocha challenged this ordinance on the grounds that, under Peruvian law, local governments lack authority to create such areas. The case was heard in early 2003, and on April 30, 2003, the Constitutional Tribunal issued a decision holding that, because Minera Yanacocha acquired the mining concessions in the Cerro Quilish area many years before the adoption of the contested ordinance, its rights were not impacted by the ordinance. On May 8, 2003, the Constitutional Tribunal reaffirmed its ruling in this mater.
 
Minera Yanacocha is committed to completing a full environmental impact study prior to initiating any development at Cerro Quilish, and will adopt mitigation measures necessary to protect the quality and quantity of the water supply of the City of Cajamarca. While the central government has the primary responsibility and the necessary technical expertise to regulate this matter, the Company is also committed to working with the local government and other affected stakeholders in completing the required studies and designing and implementing any necessary mitigation measures.
 
Newmont Australia Limited—100% Newmont Owned
 
Australian Taxation Office Review:     In February 1999, Normandy (now Newmont Australia Limited) sold certain subsidiary companies in a transaction that resulted in net cash proceeds of A$663 million. The sale did not give rise to any tax liability to Newmont Australia Limited because of the tax basis that Newmont Australia Limited had in the shares in the subsidiaries and the capital losses available to Newmont Australia Limited to offset the net gain of the sale. This transaction is currently the subject of a review by the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”), which commenced in early 2001 and is still ongoing. The ATO has sought documents from Newmont Australia Limited, the buyer of the subsidiaries and other parties. It is not yet known whether the ATO will disagree with the tax treatment of the transaction. Newmont Australia Limited believes that its tax treatment was in accordance with the provisions of the relevant tax laws. The Company cannot reasonably predict what future action the ATO may take in relation to this matter.
 
Yandal Gold Pty Ltd.—100% Newmont Owned
 
Newmont Yandal Operations:     In a Federal Court action brought by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (“ASIC”) against Yandal Gold Pty Ltd., a subsidiary of Newmont Australia Limited,
 
38

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (“Edensor”), and others in relation to the 1999 acquisition of Great Central Mines (“GCM”, now named Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd), the judge found violations of the Australian Corporations Law and ordered payment by Edensor to ASIC of A$28.5 million for distribution to former GCM shareholders. The judge also entered an order allowing the former shareholders to elect to reacquire their shares in GCM. After appeals to the Full Federal Court and the High Court on jurisdictional matters, the Full Federal Court rejected Edensor’s appeal on the merits and in September 2002, the High Court declined further review of the matter. Newmont Australia Limited had previously agreed to pay one-half of the A$28.5 million and, after finalizing an additional commercial transaction with Edensor in relation to certain mining properties and interests, Newmont Australia Limited paid in full A$28.5 million plus interest to ASIC in September 2002 all of which has been accounted for as part of the Normandy purchase price. Newmont Australia Limited filed a motion with the Federal Court to negate that portion of its original order granting former GCM shareholders the right to reacquire their shares and ASIC consented to the orders sought in this motion. On February 18, 2003, the Court granted the application for the consent orders such that the former GCM shareholders will not have the opportunity to reacquire their shares in GCM.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company operates in numerous countries around the world and accordingly it is subject to, and pays annual income taxes with under the various income tax regimes in the countries in which it operates. Some of these tax regimes are defined by contractual agreements with the local government, but many of which are the general corporate income tax laws of the country. The Company has historically filed, and continues to file, all required income tax returns and to pay the taxes reasonably determined to be due. The tax rules and regulations in many countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation. From time to time the Company will undergo a review of its historic income tax filings and in connection with such reviews, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation of the rules or the application of certain rules to the Company’s business conducted within the country involved. As of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 the Company has accrued income taxes (and related interest and penalties, if applicable) in the amount of $321.5 million. This amount represents what the Company believes will be the probable outcome from the settlement of such disputes for all tax years for which additional income taxes can be assessed.
 
Guarantee of Third Party Indebtedness
 
Newmont USA Limited has guaranteed Pollution Control Revenue Bonds with a principal amount of $35.7 million, due 2009, of BHP Copper Inc., formerly known as Magma Copper Company. At the time the bonds were issued, Magma was a wholly owned subsidiary of Newmont USA Limited. Magma was spun-off as an independent, separately traded company in 1987, and was acquired in 1995 by the company now known as BHP Billiton Limited. Newmont USA Limited will be required to perform under the guarantee in the event that BHP Copper defaults on the bonds; in that event, Newmont USA Limited would be liable for the amount of any unpaid principal and interest outstanding at the time of the default. It is expected that Newmont USA Limited will be required to remain liable on this guarantee as long as the bonds remain outstanding. Newmont USA Limited currently has no carrying value for this contingent liability, because it does not expect to have to pay any amount under the guarantee in the future given the financial strength of BHP Copper’s parent company. In the event that it does have to perform under the guarantee, Newmont USA Limited would have a right of subrogation to the bondholders.

Other Commitments and Contingencies
 
In a 1993 asset exchange, a wholly owned subsidiary transferred a coal lease under which the subsidiary had collected advance royalty payments totaling $484 million. From 1994 to 2018, remaining advance payments under the lease to the transferee total $390 million. In the event of title failure as stated in the lease, this
 
39

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
subsidiary has a primary obligation to refund previously collected payments and has a secondary obligation to refund any of the $390 million collected by the transferee, if the transferee fails to meet its refund obligation. The subsidiary has no direct liability to the lessor and has title insurance on the leased coal deposits of $240 million covering the secondary obligation. The Company and the subsidiary regard the circumstances entitling the lessor to a refund as remote. The Company has agreed to maintain the subsidiary’s net worth at $108 million until July 1, 2025.
 
The Company has minimum royalty obligations on one of its producing mines in Nevada for the life of the mine. Amounts paid as a minimum royalty (where production royalties are less than the minimum obligation) in any year are recoverable in future years when the minimum royalty obligation is exceeded. Although the minimum royalty requirement may not be met in a particular year, the Company expects that over the mine life, gold production will be sufficient to meet the minimum royalty requirements.
 
As part of its ongoing business and operations, the Company and its affiliates are required to provide surety bonds, bank letters of credit and bank guarantees as financial support for various purposes, including environmental reclamation, exploration permitting, workers compensation programs and other general corporate purposes. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, there were $199.1 million and $177.0 million of outstanding letters of credit, surety bonds and bank guarantees (excluding the surety bond supporting the prepaid forward transaction described in the Financing Activities section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition). The surety bonds, letters of credit and bank guarantees reflect fair value as a condition of their underlying purpose and are subject to fees competitively determined in the market place. The obligations associated with these instruments are generally related to performance requirements that the Company addresses through its ongoing operations. As the specific requirements are met, the beneficiary of the associated instrument cancels and/or returns the instrument to the issuing entity. Certain of these instruments are associated with operating sites with long-lived assets and will remain outstanding until closure. Generally, bonding requirements associated with environmental regulation are becoming more restrictive. In addition, the surety markets for certain types of environmental bonding used by the Company have become increasingly constrained. The Company, however, believes it is in compliance with all applicable bonding obligations and will be able to satisfy future bonding requirements, through existing or alternative means, as they arise.
 
Newmont is from time to time involved in various legal proceedings related to its business. Except as discussed above, management does not believe that adverse decisions in any pending or threatened proceeding or that amounts that may be required to be paid by reason thereof will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
 
40

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(19)    PRO FORMA STOCK OPTION COMPENSATION EXPENSE
 
The Company applies the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for stock options. Accordingly, because stock option exercise prices equal the market value on the date of grant, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options. Had compensation cost for the options been determined based on market value at grant dates as prescribed by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation,” the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been the pro forma amounts indicated below (in millions, except per share data):
 
 	  	Three Months
Ended June 30,
	 	 	Six Months
Ended June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
Net income applicable to common shares	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As reported	  	$	90.8	 	 	$	67.1	 	 	$	208.1	 	 	$	58.4	 	
SFAS 123 expense	  	 	(5.4	)	 	 	(1.7	)	 	 	(8.2	)	 	 	(4.7	)	
 	  				 				 				 				
Pro forma	  	$	85.4	 	 	$	65.4	 	 	$	199.9	 	 	$	53.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) per share, basic	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As reported	  	$	0.22	 	 	$	0.17	 	 	$	0.52	 	 	$	0.17	 	
SFAS 123 expense	  	 	(0.01	)	 	 	(0.01	)	 	 	(0.02	)	 	 	(0.01	)	
 	  				 				 				 				
Pro forma	  	$	0.21	 	 	$	0.16	 	 	$	0.50	 	 	$	0.16	 	
 	  				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) per share, diluted	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As reported	  	$	0.22	 	 	$	0.17	 	 	$	0.51	 	 	$	0.17	 	
SFAS 123 expense	  	 	(0.01	)	 	 	(0.01	)	 	 	(0.02	)	 	 	(0.01	)	
 	  				 				 				 				
Pro forma	  	$	0.21	 	 	$	0.16	 	 	$	0.49	 	 	$	0.16	 	

41

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
(20)    CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
 	  	Three Months Ended June 30, 2003
	 	
Consolidating Statement of Operations
	  	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Revenues	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales—gold	  	$	—	 	 	$	519.6	 	 	$	204.4	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	724.0	 	
Sales—base metals, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	12.8	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	12.8	 	
Royalties	  	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	10.7	 	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	10.4	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	—	 	 	 	519.7	 	 	 	227.9	 	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	747.2	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Costs and expenses	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	  	 	—	 	 	 	281.6	 	 	 	142.8	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	423.7	 	
Base metals	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	10.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	10.0	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	  	 	—	 	 	 	93.7	 	 	 	45.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	139.3	 	
Exploration and research	  	 	—	 	 	 	16.6	 	 	 	13.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	30.2	 	
General and administrative	  	 	—	 	 	 	23.2	 	 	 	7.7	 	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	31.3	 	
Write-down of long-lived assets	  	 	—	 	 	 	1.2	 	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1.8	 	
Other	  	 	—	 	 	 	4.0	 	 	 	(1.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	2.4	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	—	 	 	 	420.3	 	 	 	218.7	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	638.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Other income (expense)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain on gold commodity derivative instruments, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	(18.6	)	 	 	111.8	 	 	 	(76.6	)	 	 	16.6	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	94.4	 	 	 	94.4	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	76.6	 	 	 	76.6	 	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income (loss)—intercompany	  	 	5.3	 	 	 	8.4	 	 	 	2.0	 	 	 	(15.7	)	 	 	—	 	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income (loss)	  	 	31.2	 	 	 	8.5	 	 	 	(7.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	32.3	 	
Interest expense—intercompany	  	 	(2.4	)	 	 	(1.5	)	 	 	(11.8	)	 	 	15.7	 	 	 	—	 	
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest	  	 	(0.6	)	 	 	(16.7	)	 	 	(5.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(22.7	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	33.5	 	 	 	(19.9	)	 	 	89.2	 	 	 	94.4	 	 	 	197.2	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity income (loss) and impairment of affiliates	  	 	33.5	 	 	 	79.5	 	 	 	98.4	 	 	 	(94.3	)	 	 	305.7	 	
Income tax expense	  	 	(11.8	)	 	 	(28.2	)	 	 	(18.5	)	 	 	(30.5	)	 	 	(89.0	)	
Minority interest in (income) loss of subsidiaries	  	 	—	 	 	 	(36.9	)	 	 	12.9	 	 	 	(11.8	)	 	 	(35.8	)	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	  	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	(107.8	)	 	 	––	 	 	 	(107.8	)	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	  	 	69.2	 	 	 	18.4	 	 	 	138.0	 	 	 	(207.8	)	 	 	17.8	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss)	  	 	90.9	 	 	 	32.8	 	 	 	123.0	 	 	 	(155.8	)	 	 	90.9	 	
Preferred stock dividends	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	  	$	90.9	 	 	$	32.8	 	 	$	123.0	 	 	$	(155.8	)	 	$	90.9	 	

42

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	  	Three Months Ended June 30, 2002
	 	
Consolidating Statement of Operations
	  	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Revenues	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales—gold	  	$	—	 	 	$	436.8	 	 	$	172.7	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	609.5	 	
Sales—base metals, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	22.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	22.9	 	
Royalties	  	 	—	 	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	12.4	 	 	 	(1.8	)	 	 	11.2	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	—	 	 	 	437.4	 	 	 	208.0	 	 	 	(1.8	)	 	 	643.6	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Costs and expenses	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	  	 	—	 	 	 	276.1	 	 	 	109.6	 	 	 	(2.3	)	 	 	383.4	 	
Base metals	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	8.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	8.7	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	  	 	—	 	 	 	68.3	 	 	 	55.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	123.6	 	
Exploration and research	  	 	—	 	 	 	10.9	 	 	 	7.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	18.8	 	
General and administrative	  	 	—	 	 	 	20.8	 	 	 	6.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	27.7	 	
Other	  	 	—	 	 	 	(0.5	)	 	 	(1.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.8	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	—	 	 	 	375.6	 	 	 	187.1	 	 	 	(2.3	)	 	 	560.4	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Other income (expense)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain on investments	  	 	—	 	 	 	47.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	47.3	 	
Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	(9.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(9.5	)	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income (loss)—intercompany	  	 	5.0	 	 	 	1.4	 	 	 	8.5	 	 	 	(14.9	)	 	 	—	 	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income	  	 	—	 	 	 	3.6	 	 	 	11.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	14.9	 	
Interest expense—intercompany	  	 	(5.6	)	 	 	(2.8	)	 	 	(6.2	)	 	 	14.6	 	 	 	—	 	
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	(25.1	)	 	 	(10.0	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(35.1	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	(0.6	)	 	 	24.8	 	 	 	(6.3	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	17.6	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Pre-tax (loss) income before minority interest and equity income (loss)	  	 	(0.6	)	 	 	86.6	 	 	 	14.6	 	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	100.8	 	
Income tax (expense) benefit	  	 	—	 	 	 	(18.5	)	 	 	(15.4	)	 	 	4.1	 	 	 	(29.8	)	
Minority interest in (income) loss of subsidiaries	  	 	(7.4	)	 	 	(18.3	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	6.5	 	 	 	(19.3	)	
Equity loss of Australian Magnesium Corporation	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.7	)	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	  	 	77.0	 	 	 	13.5	 	 	 	15.0	 	 	 	(87.5	)	 	 	18.0	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss)	  	 	69.0	 	 	 	63.3	 	 	 	13.4	 	 	 	(76.7	)	 	 	69.0	 	
Preferred stock dividends	  	 	(1.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.9	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	  	$	67.1	 	 	$	63.3	 	 	$	13.4	 	 	$	(76.7	)	 	$	67.1	 	

 
43

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	 	Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
	 	
Consolidating Statement of Operations
	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	 	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Revenues	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales—gold	 	$	—	 	 	$	1,077.2	 	 	$	361.4	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	1,438.6	 	
Sales—base metals, net	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	32.2	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	32.2	 	
Royalties	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	25.7	 	 	 	(0.9	)	 	 	24.9	 	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,077.3	 	 	 	419.3	 	 	 	(0.9	)	 	 	1,495.7	 	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
Costs and expenses	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	 	 	—	 	 	 	573.6	 	 	 	250.4	 	 	 	(1.3	)	 	 	822.7	 	
Base metals	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	25.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	25.3	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	 	 	—	 	 	 	181.2	 	 	 	88.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	269.9	 	
Exploration and research	 	 	—	 	 	 	27.4	 	 	 	24.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	51.7	 	
General and administrative	 	 	—	 	 	 	43.1	 	 	 	14.1	 	 	 	0.5	 	 	 	57.7	 	
Write-down of long-lived assets	 	 	—	 	 	 	1.2	 	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1.8	 	
Other	 	 	—	 	 	 	28.8	 	 	 	3.4	 	 	 	(7.6	)	 	 	24.6	 	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
 	 	 	—	 	 	 	855.3	 	 	 	406.8	 	 	 	(8.4	)	 	 	1,253.7	 	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
Other income (expense)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain (loss) on investments, net	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	91.9	 	 	 	(7.6	)	 	 	84.3	 	
Gain on gold commodity derivative instruments, net	 	 	—	 	 	 	(18.6	)	 	 	166.8	 	 	 	(76.6	)	 	 	71.6	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net	 	 	—	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	94.4	 	 	 	94.4	 	
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	76.6	 	 	 	76.6	 	
Loss on extinguishment of debt	 	 	—	 	 	 	(14.3	)	 	 	(5.2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(19.5	)	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income (loss)—intercompany	 	 	10.2	 	 	 	12.5	 	 	 	6.1	 	 	 	(28.8	)	 	 	—	 	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income (loss)	 	 	56.1	 	 	 	11.2	 	 	 	(3.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	64.2	 	
Interest expense—intercompany	 	 	(4.6	)	 	 	(4.9	)	 	 	(19.3	)	 	 	28.8	 	 	 	—	 	
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest	 	 	(1.1	)	 	 	(37.3	)	 	 	(14.2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(52.6	)	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
 	 	 	60.6	 	 	 	(51.4	)	 	 	223.0	 	 	 	86.8	 	 	 	319.0	 	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
Pre-tax income (loss) before minority interest, equity
    income (loss) and impairment of affiliates and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	 	 	60.6	 	 	 	170.6	 	 	 	235.5	 	 	 	(94.3	)	 	 	561.0	 	
Income tax expense	 	 	(21.2	)	 	 	(49.1	)	 	 	(50.8	)	 	 	(30.5	)	 	 	(151.6	)	
Minority interest in (income) loss of subsidiaries	 	 	—	 	 	 	(75.9	)	 	 	9.4	 	 	 	(7.1	)	 	 	(73.6	)	
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation	 	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	(119.5	)	 	 	––	 	 	 	(119.5	)	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	 	 	168.7	 	 	 	25.8	 	 	 	154.0	 	 	 	(322.2	)	 	 	26.3	 	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	 	 	208.1	 	 	 	71.4	 	 	 	228.6	 	 	 	(265.5	)	 	 	242.6	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax	 	 	—	 	 	 	(31.5	)	 	 	(3.0	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(34.5	)	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss)	 	 	208.1	 	 	 	39.9	 	 	 	225.6	 	 	 	(265.5	)	 	 	208.1	 	
Preferred stock dividends	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	 	$	208.1	 	 	$	39.9	 	 	$	225.6	 	 	$	(265.5	)	 	$	208.1	 	

44

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	  	Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
	 	
Consolidating Statement of Operations
	  	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Revenues	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Sales—gold	  	$	—	 	 	$	840.8	 	 	$	251.0	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	1,091.8	 	
Sales—base metals, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	32.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	32.3	 	
Royalties	  	 	—	 	 	 	1.2	 	 	 	16.2	 	 	 	(2.4	)	 	 	15.0	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	—	 	 	 	842.0	 	 	 	299.5	 	 	 	(2.4	)	 	 	1,139.1	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Costs and expenses	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gold	  	 	—	 	 	 	552.4	 	 	 	162.3	 	 	 	(2.7	)	 	 	712.0	 	
Base metals	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	19.4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	19.4	 	
Depreciation, depletion and amortization	  	 	—	 	 	 	149.4	 	 	 	76.4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	225.8	 	
Exploration and research	  	 	—	 	 	 	19.8	 	 	 	10.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	30.4	 	
General and administrative	  	 	—	 	 	 	37.6	 	 	 	11.4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	49.0	 	
Other	  	 	—	 	 	 	2.4	 	 	 	(3.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.9	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	—	 	 	 	761.6	 	 	 	276.8	 	 	 	(2.7	)	 	 	1,035.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Other income (expense)	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gains on investments	  	 	––	 	 	 	47.3	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	47.3	 	
Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	(3.5	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3.1	)	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income (loss)—intercompany	  	 	5.0	 	 	 	1.9	 	 	 	10.6	 	 	 	(17.5	)	 	 	—	 	
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income (loss)	  	 	—	 	 	 	8.6	 	 	 	6.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	15.2	 	
Interest expense—intercompany	  	 	(5.6	)	 	 	(2.8	)	 	 	(9.1	)	 	 	17.5	 	 	 	—	 	
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	(50.2	)	 	 	(16.0	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(66.2	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
 	  	 	(0.6	)	 	 	5.2	 	 	 	(11.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(6.8	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Pre-tax (loss) income before minority interest, equity income (loss) and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	 	(0.6	)	 	 	85.6	 	 	 	11.3	 	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	96.6	 	
Income tax (expense) benefit	  	 	—	 	 	 	(16.8	)	 	 	(18.3	)	 	 	4.1	 	 	 	(31.0	)	
Minority interest in (income) loss of subsidiaries	  	 	(7.4	)	 	 	(28.8	)	 	 	1.4	 	 	 	5.0	 	 	 	(29.8	)	
Equity loss of Australian Magnesium Corporation	  	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	––	 	 	 	(0.7	)	
Equity income (loss) of affiliates	  	 	––	 	 	 	15.0	 	 	 	4.4	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	19.4	 	
Equity income (loss) of subsidiaries	  	 	70.2	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	9.1	 	 	 	(79.3	)	 	 	––	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	 	62.2	 	 	 	55.0	 	 	 	7.2	 	 	 	(69.9	)	 	 	54.5	 	
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax	  	 	—	 	 	 	7.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	7.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss)	  	 	62.2	 	 	 	62.7	 	 	 	7.2	 	 	 	(69.9	)	 	 	62.2	 	
Preferred stock dividends	  	 	(3.8	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3.8	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net income (loss) applicable to common shares	  	$	58.4	 	 	$	62.7	 	 	$	7.2	 	 	$	(69.9	)	 	$	58.4	 	

45

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	  	At June 30, 2003
	 	
Consolidating Balance Sheets
	  	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Assets	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	  	$	—	 	 	$	181.7	 	 	$	93.0	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	274.7	 	
Marketable securities—short-term	  	 	—	 	 	 	1.5	 	 	 	10.5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	12.0	 	
Accounts receivable	  	 	154.0	 	 	 	36.3	 	 	 	284.0	 	 	 	(429.3	)	 	 	45.0	 	
Inventories	  	 	—	 	 	 	131.6	 	 	 	38.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	170.5	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	255.4	 	 	 	21.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	277.0	 	
Prepaid taxes	  	 	—	 	 	 	19.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	19.3	 	
Deferred stripping costs—short term	  	 	—	 	 	 	24.0	 	 	 	4.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	28.7	 	
Deferred income tax assets	  	 	—	 	 	 	(3.8	)	 	 	57.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	53.5	 	
Newmont Australia infrastructure bonds	  	 	—	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	114.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	114.3	 	
Other current assets	  	 	390.1	 	 	 	20.7	 	 	 	155.7	 	 	 	(503.2	)	 	 	63.3	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Current assets	  	 	544.1	 	 	 	666.7	 	 	 	780.0	 	 	 	(932.5	)	 	 	1,058.3	 	
Property, plant and mine development, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	1,955.7	 	 	 	387.4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2,343.1	 	
Mineral interests and other intangible assets, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	253.2	 	 	 	1,151.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,405.1	 	
Investments	  	 	—	 	 	 	684.9	 	 	 	869.8	 	 	 	(859.6	)	 	 	695.1	 	
Investment in subsidiaries	  	 	4,901.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2,078.6	 	 	 	(6,979.9	)	 	 	—	 	
Marketable securities—long-term	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	291.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	291.0	 	
Deferred stripping costs—long term	  	 	—	 	 	 	32.0	 	 	 	7.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	39.3	 	
Long-term stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	260.2	 	 	 	22.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	282.5	 	
Deferred income tax assets	  	 	15.1	 	 	 	538.4	 	 	 	325.8	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	879.3	 	
Other long-term assets	  	 	0.8	 	 	 	554.6	 	 	 	4.8	 	 	 	(471.0	)	 	 	89.2	 	
Goodwill	  	 	—	 	 	 	93.7	 	 	 	2,975.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	3,068.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total assets	  	$	5,461.3	 	 	$	5,039.4	 	 	$	8,893.9	 	 	$	(9,243.0	)	 	$	10,151.6	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Liabilities	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current portion of long-term debt	  	$	—	 	 	$	58.9	 	 	$	117.5	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	176.4	 	
Accounts payable	  	 	129.5	 	 	 	208.2	 	 	 	101.7	 	 	 	(288.4	)	 	 	151.0	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities	  	 	—	 	 	 	8.8	 	 	 	0.4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	9.2	 	
Derivative instruments	  	 	—	 	 	 	(5.7	)	 	 	13.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	7.9	 	
Employee-related benefits—short-term	  	 	––	 	 	 	77.6	 	 	 	39.6	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	117.2	 	
Other accrued liabilities	  	 	20.7	 	 	 	541.1	 	 	 	499.7	 	 	 	(641.4	)	 	 	420.1	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Current liabilities	  	 	150.2	 	 	 	888.9	 	 	 	772.5	 	 	 	(929.8	)	 	 	881.8	 	
Long-term debt	  	 	19.0	 	 	 	993.6	 	 	 	264.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,277.2	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities	  	 	—	 	 	 	295.9	 	 	 	126.1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	422.0	 	
Deferred revenue from sale of future production	  	 	—	 	 	 	53.8	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	53.8	 	
Derivative instruments	  	 	—	 	 	 	(53.3	)	 	 	70.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	17.3	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities	  	 	64.0	 	 	 	145.8	 	 	 	501.9	 	 	 	30.5	 	 	 	742.2	 	
Employee related benefits—long-term	  	 	—	 	 	 	214.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	214.7	 	
Other long-term liabilities	  	 	294.2	 	 	 	107.2	 	 	 	546.3	 	 	 	(568.1	)	 	 	379.6	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total liabilities	  	 	527.4	 	 	 	2,646.6	 	 	 	2,282.0	 	 	 	(1,467.4	)	 	 	3,988.6	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Minority interest in subsidiaries	  	 	—	 	 	 	409.6	 	 	 	346.5	 	 	 	(393.9	)	 	 	362.2	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Stockholders’ equity	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Preferred stock	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	60.7	 	 	 	(60.7	)	 	 	—	 	
Common stock	  	 	579.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	579.7	 	
Additional paid-in capital	  	 	4,284.6	 	 	 	2,045.1	 	 	 	5,785.6	 	 	 	(6,962.0	)	 	 	5,153.3	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	  	 	(3.9	)	 	 	(43.6	)	 	 	(10.6	)	 	 	54.2	 	 	 	(3.9	)	
Retained (deficit) earnings	  	 	73.5	 	 	 	(18.3	)	 	 	429.6	 	 	 	(413.7	)	 	 	71.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total stockholders’ equity	  	 	4,933.9	 	 	 	1,983.2	 	 	 	6,265.4	 	 	 	(7,381.7	)	 	 	5,800.8	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	  	$	5,461.3	 	 	$	5,039.4	 	 	$	8,893.9	 	 	$	(9,243.0	)	 	$	10,151.6	 	

46

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	  	At December 31, 2002
	 	
Consolidating Balance Sheets
	  	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Assets	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	  	$	—	 	 	$	165.1	 	 	$	236.6	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	401.7	 	
Marketable securities—short-term	  	 	—	 	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	12.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	13.2	 	
Accounts receivable	  	 	14.2	 	 	 	43.1	 	 	 	184.4	 	 	 	(197.2	)	 	 	44.5	 	
Inventories	  	 	—	 	 	 	126.4	 	 	 	42.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	169.3	 	
Stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	308.9	 	 	 	20.1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	329.0	 	
Prepaid taxes	  	 	—	 	 	 	28.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	28.3	 	
Deferred stripping costs—short term	  	 	—	 	 	 	25.1	 	 	 	7.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	32.1	 	
Deferred income tax assets	  	 	—	 	 	 	4.6	 	 	 	46.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	51.5	 	
Other current assets	  	 	331.9	 	 	 	163.8	 	 	 	221.0	 	 	 	(673.0	)	 	 	43.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Current assets	  	 	346.1	 	 	 	865.9	 	 	 	771.5	 	 	 	(870.2	)	 	 	1,113.3	 	
Property, plant and mine development, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	1,916.5	 	 	 	370.5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2,287.0	 	
Mineral interests and other intangible assets, net	  	 	—	 	 	 	243.6	 	 	 	1,171.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,415.3	 	
Marketable securities—long-term	  	 	—	 	 	 	661.0	 	 	 	3,276.7	 	 	 	(2,731.0	)	 	 	1,206.7	 	
Investment in subsidiaries	  	 	4,516.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4,516.9	)	 	 	—	 	
Deferred stripping costs—long term	  	 	—	 	 	 	18.6	 	 	 	4.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	23.3	 	
Long-term stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	171.1	 	 	 	28.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	199.8	 	
Deferred income tax assets	  	 	—	 	 	 	481.1	 	 	 	280.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	761.4	 	
Other long-term assets	  	 	1.0	 	 	 	318.3	 	 	 	28.0	 	 	 	(227.2	)	 	 	120.1	 	
Goodwill	  	 	—	 	 	 	93.7	 	 	 	2,933.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	3,027.6	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total assets	  	$	4,864.0	 	 	$	4,769.8	 	 	$	8,866.0	 	 	$	(8,345.3	)	 	$	10,154.5	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Liabilities	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Current portion of long-term debt	  	$	—	 	 	$	91.5	 	 	$	23.8	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	115.3	 	
Accounts payable	  	 	115.9	 	 	 	81.4	 	 	 	104.9	 	 	 	(196.9	)	 	 	105.3	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities	  	 	—	 	 	 	26.9	 	 	 	1.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	28.5	 	
Derivative instruments	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	75.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	75.0	 	
Employee-related benefits—short-term	  	 	––	 	 	 	63.8	 	 	 	37.2	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	101.0	 	
Other accrued liabilities	  	 	48.3	 	 	 	422.5	 	 	 	471.0	 	 	 	(673.4	)	 	 	268.4	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Current liabilities	  	 	164.2	 	 	 	686.1	 	 	 	713.5	 	 	 	(870.3	)	 	 	693.5	 	
Long-term debt	  	 	—	 	 	 	1,090.1	 	 	 	611.2	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,701.3	 	
Reclamation and remediation liabilities	  	 	—	 	 	 	168.0	 	 	 	120.5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	288.5	 	
Deferred revenue from sale of future production	  	 	—	 	 	 	53.8	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	53.8	 	
Derivative instruments	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	388.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	388.7	 	
Deferred income tax liabilities	  	 	49.0	 	 	 	155.2	 	 	 	452.2	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	656.4	 	
Employee related benefits—long-term	  	 	—	 	 	 	232.8	 	 	 	1.3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	234.1	 	
Other long-term liabilities	  	 	161.0	 	 	 	95.1	 	 	 	335.6	 	 	 	(227.3	)	 	 	364.4	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total liabilities	  	 	374.2	 	 	 	2,481.1	 	 	 	2,623.0	 	 	 	(1,097.6	)	 	 	4,380.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Minority interest in subsidiaries	  	 	—	 	 	 	379.3	 	 	 	365.1	 	 	 	(389.8	)	 	 	354.6	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Stockholders’ equity	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Preferred stock	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	60.7	 	 	 	(60.7	)	 	 	—	 	
Common stock	  	 	565.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	565.0	 	
Additional paid-in capital	  	 	4,109.0	 	 	 	2,022.2	 	 	 	5,688.7	 	 	 	(6,781.5	)	 	 	5,038.4	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	  	 	(64.0	)	 	 	(54.3	)	 	 	(74.7	)	 	 	129.0	 	 	 	(64.0	)	
Retained (deficit) earnings	  	 	(120.2	)	 	 	(58.5	)	 	 	203.1	 	 	 	(144.6	)	 	 	(120.2	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total stockholders’ equity	  	 	4,489.8	 	 	 	1,909.4	 	 	 	5,877.9	 	 	 	(6,857.9	)	 	 	5,419.2	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	  	$	4,864.0	 	 	$	4,769.8	 	 	$	8,866.0	 	 	$	(8,345.3	)	 	$	10,154.5	 	

47

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	  	Six Months Ended June 30, 2003
	 	
Statement of Consolidating Cash Flows
	  	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Operating activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	$	208.1	 	 	$	39.9	 	 	$	225.6	 	 	$	(265.5	)	 	$	208.1	 	
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities	  	 	(224.8	)	 	 	212.2	 	 	 	(133.3	)	 	 	265.4	 	 	 	119.5	 	
Change in working capital	  	 	15.3	 	 	 	(19.3	)	 	 	(73.9	)	 	 	(24.8	)	 	 	(102.7	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	  	 	(1.4	)	 	 	232.8	 	 	 	18.4	 	 	 	(24.9	)	 	 	224.9	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Investing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Additions to property, plant and mine development	  	 	—	 	 	 	(160.7	)	 	 	(54.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(215.3	)	
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments	  	 	—	 	 	 	10.0	 	 	 	(56.2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(46.2	)	
Proceeds from sale of TVX Newmont Americas	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	180.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	180.0	 	
Investments in affiliates and other	  	 	0.6	 	 	 	10.1	 	 	 	(48.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(37.7	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	  	 	0.6	 	 	 	(140.6	)	 	 	20.8	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(119.2	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Financing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net borrowings (repayments)	  	 	4.5	 	 	 	(75.6	)	 	 	(136.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(207.4	)	
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock	  	 	(28.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3.7	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(32.3	)	
Proceeds from stock issuance and other	  	 	24.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(24.9	)	 	 	24.9	 	 	 	24.9	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	  	 	0.8	 	 	 	(75.6	)	 	 	(164.9	)	 	 	24.9	 	 	 	(214.8	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(17.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(17.9	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	  	 	—	 	 	 	16.6	 	 	 	(143.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(127.0	)	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	  	 	—	 	 	 	165.1	 	 	 	236.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	401.7	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	  	 	—	 	 	 	181.7	 	 	 	93.0	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	274.7	 	

48

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
 	  	Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
	 	
Statement of Consolidating Cash Flows
	  	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
	 	 	Newmont
USA
	 	 	Other
Subsidiaries
	 	 	Eliminations
	 	 	Newmont
Mining
Corporation
Consolidated
	 	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	 	
Operating activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net income	  	$	62.2	 	 	$	62.7	 	 	$	7.2	 	 	$	(69.9	)	 	$	62.2	 	
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities	  	 	0.3	 	 	 	114.9	 	 	 	86.5	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	201.4	 	
Change in working capital	  	 	—	 	 	 	11.1	 	 	 	(76.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(65.5	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net cash provided by operating activities	  	 	62.5	 	 	 	188.7	 	 	 	17.1	 	 	 	(70.2	)	 	 	198.1	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Investing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Additions to property, plant and mine development	  	 	—	 	 	 	(100.1	)	 	 	(40.7	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(140.8	)	
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	406.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	406.7	 	
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities of Lihir	  	 	––	 	 	 	84.0	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	84.0	 	
Proceeds from settlement of cross currency swaps	  	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	50.8	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	50.8	 	
Net cash effect of acquisitions	  	 	(87.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(87.9	)	
Investments in affiliates	  	 	(70.2	)	 	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	70.2	 	 	 	––	 	
Proceeds from asset sales and other	  	 	––	 	 	 	(19.2	)	 	 	14.4	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	(4.8	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	  	 	(158.1	)	 	 	(35.3	)	 	 	431.2	 	 	 	70.2	 	 	 	308.0	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Financing activities:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net borrowings (repayments)	  	 	58.8	 	 	 	(180.6	)	 	 	(300.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(422.7	)	
Dividends paid on common and preferred stock	  	 	(22.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(25.9	)	
Proceeds from stock issuance	  	 	59.3	 	 	 	3.6	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	––	 	 	 	62.9	 	
Other	  	 	0.1	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	––	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.6	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	  	 	95.6	 	 	 	(177.7	)	 	 	(304.2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(386.3	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash	  	 	—	 	 	 	1.6	 	 	 	14.6	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	16.2	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	  	 	—	 	 	 	(22.7	)	 	 	158.7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	136.0	 	
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	  	 	—	 	 	 	149.4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	149.4	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	  	$	—	 	 	$	126.7	 	 	$	158.7	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	285.4	 	

(21)    SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
 
NYOL
 
On July 3, 2003, the board of directors of NYOL resolved to place the company into VA as it was insolvent or likely to become insolvent. Under Australian VA law, the powers of all NYOL officers have been suspended and control of NYOL has been transferred to an Independent Administrator. During the VA process, the role of the directors of NYOL is to assist the Independent Administrator and provide certain information. The Independent Administrator’s role is to manage the operations of NYOL during such time as the Independent Administrator investigates whether NYOL’s creditors and NYOL can work out a solution to NYOL’s financial position such that NYOL may be returned to the control of the original board of directors, reorganized or liquidated. The Independent Administrator is responsible for soliciting and accessing proposed deeds of company arrangement (“DOCA”), with the creditors’ role essentially limited to consulting with the administrator and then voting on the proposed DOCA. Under Australian VA law, the court is called upon only when disputes require adjudication during the process. VA is governed by strict timeframes, with a decision on the future of the company made at a meeting a maximum of 28 days from the commencement of the administration (with extensions allowed with court approval). As a result of NYOL’s placement into VA on July 3, 2003, Newmont does not have the unilateral ability to control or effectively control NYOL during the VA process, and accordingly, Newmont concluded that, in accordance with paragraph 4 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 94, it is appropriate to deconsolidate NYOL from the consolidated group effective on that date.
 
49

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
 
In conjunction with the VA process, Newmont has made an offer to the Independent Administrator that, if accepted, would bring NYOL out of VA. The offer effectively values the assets at $200 million and may result in NYOL’s outstanding third-party Senior Note holders and the remaining hedge contract counterparty receiving not more than $0.40 on the dollar. If Newmont’s offer is accepted, NYOL would be returned to the control of its directors, and its employees would continue their employment as usual. In addition, Newmont would honor any prior unpaid obligations to NYOL’s employees and offer trade creditors payment in full.
 
In order to comply with applicable requirements and to allow holders of NYOL’s outstanding 8  7 / 8 % Senior Notes more time to assess these developments, YBCL extended the expiration of the offer to acquire the Senior Notes to July 11, 2003. YBCL subsequently extended the deadline to July 18, 2003. Since June 30, 2003, YBCL has received tenders for an additional $40.2 million of principal, such that YBCL has now received tenders for a total of $237.0 million of principal, or 99.9% of the original $237.2 million outstanding third-party principal at the date of its initial offer.
 
Mesquite Mine
 
On July 3, 2003, Newmont signed a letter of intent with Western Goldfields, Inc. (“WGI”) to sell its Mesquite mine. Under the terms of the proposed transaction, Newmont would sell the majority of the assets of the operation to WGI in exchange for restricted common stock and warrants to purchase common stock of WGI, a 50% net profits interest, royalty on future production from existing leach pads, net of smelter return, royalties on production from future expansion, and the assumption of reclamation and remediation liabilities by WGI associated with the operation. Newmont would also be released from the performance bonds for reclamation, remediation, mine closure and other obligations associated with the assets being sold. The transaction is subject to certain conditions precedent before closing, including the completion of due diligence by WGI. The transaction is not expected to have a significant impact on Newmont’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
 
Australian Magnesium Corporation (“AMC”)
 
On July 22, 2003, AMC issued 16,115,754 of ordinary shares to a shareholder other than Newmont. As a result of the issuance, Newmont’s holdings in AMC were diluted to a 26.9% interest in the company. The transaction did not have a significant impact on Newmont’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
 
(22)    SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
 
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six months ended June 30, 2003 was 9.2%. The ratio of earnings to fixed charges represents income before income taxes and interest expense divided by interest expense. Interest expense includes amortization of capitalized interest and the portion of rent expense representative of interest. Newmont guarantees certain third party debt; however, it has not been and does not expect to be required to pay any amounts associated with such debt. Therefore, related interest on such debt has not been included in the ratio of earnings to fixed charges.
 
50

ITEM 2.	 	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION	
 
The following provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the consolidated results of operations and financial condition of Newmont Mining Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Newmont” or the “Company”). The discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in Newmont’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. References to “A$” refer to Australian currency, “CDN$” to Canadian currency, and “US$” or “$” to United States currency.
 
Accounting Changes
 
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
 
During the third quarter of 2002, Newmont changed its accounting policy, retroactive to January 1, 2002, with respect to Depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of Property, plant and mine development , net to exclude future estimated development costs expected to be incurred for certain underground operations. Previously, the Company had included these costs and associated reserves in its DD&A calculations at certain of its underground mining operations. In addition, the Company further revised its policy such that costs incurred to access specific ore blocks or areas that only provide benefit over the life of that area are depreciated, depleted or amortized over the reserves associated with the specific ore area. These changes were made to better match DD&A with the associated ounces of gold sold and to remove the inherent uncertainty in estimating future development costs in arriving at DD&A rates. The cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle through December 31, 2001 increased net income during the six months ended June 30, 2002 by $7.7 million, net of tax of $4.1 million and increased net income per share by $0.02.
 
Reclamation
 
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which established uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. Newmont adopted the statement on January 1, 2003 when the Company recorded the estimated fair value of reclamation liabilities (“asset retirement obligation” or “ARO”) and increased the carrying amount of the related assets (“asset retirement cost” or “ARC”) to be retired in the future. The ARC will be depreciated over the life of the related assets and will be adjusted for changes resulting from revisions to either the timing or amount of the original ARO fair value estimate. The cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle decreased net income during the six months ended June 30, 2003 by $34.5 million, net of tax of $11.2 million, and decreased net income per share, basic by $0.08.
 
On a pro forma basis, the liabilities for asset retirement obligations would have been $420.0 million and $422.9 million at January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2002, respectively, if SFAS No. 143 had been applied at the beginning of 2002.
 
51

The table below presents the impact of the accounting change for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and the pro forma effect for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 as if the change had been in effect for that period (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data):
 
 	  	Three months ended June 30,
	 	 	Six months ended June 30,
	 	
 	  	2003	 	  	2002	 	 	2003	 	  	2002	 	
 	  		 	  	(pro forma)
	 	 		 	  	(pro forma)
	 	
Increase/(decrease) to net income	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Costs applicable to sales (exclusive of depreciation, depletion and amortization shown separately below)	  	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Gold	  	$	4,815	 	  	$	1,752	 	 	$	10,112	 	  	$	1,905	 	
Base metals	  	 	89	 	  	 	—	 	 	 	179	 	  	 	—	 	
Depreciation, depletion, and amortization	  	 	(3,420	)	  	 	(3,307	)	 	 	(6,833	)	  	 	(6,614	)	
Income tax (expense) benefit	  	 	(519	)	  	 	544	 	 	 	(1,210	)	  	 	1,648	 	
Minority interest	  	 	(995	)	  	 	577	 	 	 	(1,953	)	  	 	1,204	 	
Equity loss of affiliate	  	 	(319	)	  	 	(201	)	 	 	(799	)	  	 	(541	)	
 	  				  				 				  				
Net loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	  	$	(349	)	  	$	(635	)	 	$	(504	)	  	$	(2,398	)	
 	  				  				 				  				
Net loss before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle per common share, basic and diluted	  	$	0.00	 	  	$	0.00	 	 	$	0.00	 	  	$	(0.01	)	

The table below presents pro forma net income and earnings per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002 as if the Company had adopted the SFAS No. 143 as of January 1, 2002 (unaudited, in thousands, except per share data):
 
 	  	Three months ended June 30, 2002
	  	Six months ended June 30, 2002
	 	
 	  	Net income
applicable to
common shares
	 	 	Income
per share
	  	Net Income applicable
to common shares
	 	 	Income
per share
	 	
As reported	  	$	67,121	 	 	$	0.17	  	$	50,753	 	 	$	0.15	 	
Change in accounting method SFAS No. 143	  	 	(635	)	 	 	—	  	 	(2,398	)	 	 	(0.01	)	
 	  				 			  				 				
Pro forma	  	$	66,486	 	 	$	0.17	  	$	(48,355	)	 	$	0.14	 	

Acquisitions
 
Normandy Mining Limited and Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation Limited
 
On February 16, 2002, pursuant to a Canadian Plan of Arrangement, Newmont acquired 100% of Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation Limited (“Franco-Nevada”) in a stock-for-stock transaction in which Franco-Nevada common stockholders received 0.8 of a share of Newmont common stock, or 0.8 of a Canadian exchangeable share (exchangeable for Newmont common), for each common share of Franco-Nevada. The exchangeable shares are substantially equivalent to Newmont common shares. On February 20, 2002, Newmont obtained control of Normandy Mining Limited (“Normandy”) through a tender offer for all of the ordinary shares in the capital of Normandy. For accounting purposes, the effective date of the Normandy acquisition was the close of business on February 15, 2002, when Newmont received the irrevocable tender from shareholders for more than 50% of the outstanding shares of Normandy. Accordingly, the results of operations of Normandy and Franco-Nevada have been included in the accompanying financial statements from February 16, 2002 forward. On February 26, 2002, when the tender offer for Normandy expired, Newmont controlled more than 96% of Normandy’s outstanding shares. Newmont exercised its rights to acquire the remaining shares of Normandy in April 2002. Consideration paid for Normandy included 3.85 shares of Newmont common stock for every 100 ordinary shares of Normandy (including ordinary shares represented by American depository receipts) plus A$0.50 per Normandy share, or the U.S. dollar equivalent of that amount for Normandy stockholders outside Australia.
 
52

Normandy was Australia’s largest gold company with interests in 16 development-stage or operating mining properties worldwide. Franco-Nevada was the world’s leading precious minerals royalty company and had interests in other investments in the mining industry. Following the February 2002 acquisitions, Normandy was renamed Newmont Australia Limited and Franco-Nevada was renamed Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited.
 
The purchase price for these acquisitions totaled $4.3 billion, composed of 197.0 million Newmont shares (or share equivalents), $461.7 million in cash and approximately $90.3 million of direct costs. The value of Newmont shares (or share equivalents) was $19.01 per share based on the average market price of the shares over the two-day period before and after January 2, 2002, the last trading day before the final and revised terms for the Normandy and Franco-Nevada acquisitions were announced.
 
The combination of Newmont, Normandy and Franco-Nevada was designed to create a platform for growth and for delivering superior returns to shareholders. With a larger global operating base, a broad and balanced portfolio of development projects and a stable income stream from mineral royalties and investments, the combined company has opportunities to optimize returns, realize synergies through rationalization of corporate overhead and exploration programs, realize operating efficiencies, reduce operating and procurement costs and reduce interest expense and income taxes. The acquisitions resulted in approximately $3.0 billion of goodwill primarily related to the merchant banking business, the combined global exploration expertise and the synergies discussed above.
 
The acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of accounting whereby assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair market values as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over such fair value was recorded as goodwill. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill was assigned to specific reporting units. Goodwill and other identifiable intangibles not subject to amortization will be reviewed for possible impairment at least annually or more frequently when an event or change in circumstances indicates that a reporting unit’s carrying amount is greater than its fair value. In conjunction with the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for 2002, the Company finalized the purchase price allocation for the Normandy and Franco-Nevada acquisitions. The final purchase price allocation resulted in an increase in goodwill from approximately $2.6 billion to approximately $3.0 billion.
 
Newmont NFM Limited Scheme of Arrangement
 
On April 2, 2003, the shareholders of Normandy NFM Limited (an Australian corporation trading as “Newmont NFM” on the Australian Stock Exchange or “ASX”) voted to approve the proposed scheme of arrangement under which Newmont NFM would become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Australia Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation, through the acquisition of the remaining minority interest of Newmont NFM. The Federal Court in Sydney, Australia approved the scheme on April 11, 2003 and the scheme became effective on April 14, 2003 after the orders of the Federal Court were filed with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Under the terms of the scheme, Newmont NFM shareholders could receive 4.40 ASX listed Newmont Mining Corporation CHESS Depositary Interests (“CDIs”), with each CDI equivalent to 0.1 Newmont Mining Corporation common shares. As an alternative to receiving Newmont Mining Corporation CDIs, shareholders could sell their Newmont NFM shares back to the company under a concurrent buy-back offer of A$16.50 per Newmont NFM share. On April 29, 2003, Newmont Mining Corporation issued 4,437,506 common shares to the CHESS Depository Nominees Pty Ltd, and in turn, 44,375,060 CDIs were issued to former Newmont NFM shareholders. The market value of the issued Newmont Mining Corporation shares was approximately $105 million, based on the average quoted value of the shares of $23.58 two days before and after November 28, 2002, the date the terms of the transaction were agreed upon and announced. The market value of the issued shares, together with the cash consideration paid to those shareholders who elected to accept the buy-back offer and acquisition costs of approximately $10 million (including transaction costs), gave rise to a total purchase price of approximately $115 million. The transaction was accounted for as a purchase of minority interest in accordance with SFAS No. 141 “Business Combinations” in
 
53

the second quarter of 2003. Newmont NFM was delisted from the ASX in April 2003. Newmont has performed a preliminary purchase price allocation based on independent appraisals and valuations that gave rise to goodwill of $77.1 million. The final purchase price allocation is not expected to vary significantly from the preliminary allocation.
 
Summary
 
Newmont recognized net income applicable to common shares of $90.8 million ($0.22 per share, basic) for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to net income of $67.1 million ($0.17 per share, basic) for the same period in 2002. The second quarter of 2003 includes, net of tax, a $63.9 million gain ($0.16 per share, basic) on the extinguishment of the bonds of Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd (“NYOL”), a Newmont Australia Limited subsidiary; $53.6 million gain ($0.13 per share, basic) on extinguishment of a NYOL derivatives liability; $11.7 million ($0.03 per share, basic) for non-cash gains on derivative instruments; and, a write-down of the investment in Australian Magnesium Corporation (“AMC”) of $107.8 million ($0.27 per share, basic). The six months ended June 30, 2003 included, net of tax, a $63.9 million gain ($0.16 per share, basic) on the extinguishment of the NYOL bonds; $53.6 million gain ($0.13 per share, basic) on the extinguishment of the NYOL derivatives liability; $53.9 million ($0.13 per share, basic) for non-cash gains on derivative instruments; $68.0 million gain ($0.17 per share, basic) for the exchange of Echo Bay Mines Ltd. (“Echo Bay”) shares for shares of Kinross; a $13.0 million ($0.03 per share, basic) loss on extinguishment of debt; and an equity loss and write-down of the AMC investment of $119.5 million ($0.30 per share, basic). Total equity gold sales ounces (ounces attributable to Newmont’s ownership or economic interest), total cash costs, total production costs and average realized gold prices per ounce were as follows:
 
 	  	Three Months Ended
June 30,
	  	Six Months Ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	
Equity gold sales ounces (000)	  	 	1,824	  	 	1,863	  	 	3,604	  	 	3,328	
Total cash costs per ounce	  	$	212	  	$	196	  	$	207	  	$	195	
Total costs per ounce	  	 	277	  	$	255	  	 	269	  	$	256	
Average price realized per ounce	  	$	353	  	$	314	  	$	352	  	$	304	
 
See reconciliation of total cash costs per ounce to Costs applicable to sales—gold starting on page 47.
 
54

Results of Operations
 
Gold Sales and Total Cash Costs
 
 	  	Equity Ounces
	  	Total Cash Costs
	
 	  	Three Months Ended June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	 
	2003
	  	 
	2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
North America:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Nevada	  	535.3	  	599.0	  	$	254	  	$	243	
Golden Giant, Canada	  	53.8	  	78.5	  	 	248	  	 	166	
Holloway, Canada	  	14.6	  	23.1	  	 	310	  	 	218	
Mesquite, California	  	15.6	  	12.4	  	 	153	  	 	164	
La Herradura, Mexico	  	17.8	  	15.2	  	 	201	  	 	180	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	637.1	  	728.2	  	 	251	  	 	231	

South America:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Yanacocha, Peru	  	343.7	  	245.4	  	 	118	  	 	141	
Kori Kollo, Bolivia	  	48.9	  	66.4	  	 	188	  	 	146	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	392.6	  	311.8	  	 	127	  	 	142	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Australia:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Pajingo	  	93.8	  	74.4	  	 	132	  	 	95	
Yandal	  	141.9	  	166.6	  	 	305	  	 	227	
Tanami	  	190.7	  	131.2	  	 	232	  	 	199	
Kalgoorlie	  	104.2	  	85.4	  	 	272	  	 	219	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	530.6	  	457.6	  	 	242	  	 	196	

Other Operations:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Minahasa, Indonesia	  	26.4	  	44.0	  	 	267	  	 	193	
Zarafshan-Newmont, Uzbekistan	  	61.6	  	71.3	  	 	150	  	 	142	
Martha, New Zealand	  	27.7	  	32.1	  	 	237	  	 	104	
Ovacik, Turkey	  	51.2	  	31.2	  	 	123	  	 	120	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	166.9	  	178.6	  	 	175	  	 	144	

Equity Investments and other:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Batu Hijau, Indonesia	  	91.9	  	63.0	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
Echo Bay	  	0.0	  	62.9	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
TVX Newmont Americas	  	0.0	  	52.0	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
Golden Grove	  	4.8	  	9.1	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Newmont Total/Weighted Average	  	1,823.9	  	1,863.2	  	$	212	  	$	196	

55

 	  	Equity Ounces
	  	Total Cash Costs
	
 	  	Six Months Ended June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	 
	2003
	  	 
	2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in thousands)	
North America:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Nevada	  	1,168.2	  	1,205.1	  	$	239	  	$	240	
Golden Giant, Canada	  	119.0	  	140.8	  	 	249	  	 	188	
Holloway, Canada	  	32.7	  	51.0	  	 	301	  	 	205	
Mesquite, California	  	30.2	  	27.9	  	 	163	  	 	160	
La Herradura, Mexico	  	34.4	  	30.8	  	 	166	  	 	181	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	1,384.5	  	1,455.6	  	 	238	  	 	231	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
South America:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Yanacocha, Peru	  	678.8	  	493.5	  	 	121	  	 	139	
Kori Kollo, Bolivia	  	100.7	  	127.0	  	 	180	  	 	154	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	779.5	  	620.5	  	 	129	  	 	142	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Australia:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Pajingo	  	167.8	  	131.4	  	 	124	  	 	88	
Yandal	  	281.2	  	253.7	  	 	290	  	 	212	
Tanami	  	296.2	  	184.7	  	 	242	  	 	198	
Kalgoorlie	  	193.2	  	126.5	  	 	261	  	 	217	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	938.4	  	696.3	  	 	239	  	 	186	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Other Operations:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Minahasa, Indonesia	  	58.1	  	85.8	  	 	250	  	 	188	
Zarafshan-Newmont, Uzbekistan	  	121.7	  	123.7	  	 	146	  	 	142	
Martha, New Zealand	  	47.3	  	46.6	  	 	229	  	 	129	
Ovacik, Turkey	  	86.2	  	48.0	  	 	125	  	 	132	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Total/Weighted Average	  	313.3	  	304.1	  	 	172	  	 	152	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Equity Investments and other:	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Batu Hijau, Indonesia	  	146.2	  	103.3	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
Echo Bay	  	21.2	  	62.9	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
TVX Newmont Americas	  	14.5	  	76.2	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
Golden Grove	  	6.8	  	9.1	  	 	N/A	  	 	N/A	
 	  		  		  	 	 	  	 	 	
Newmont Total/Weighted Average	  	3,604.4	  	3,328.0	  	$	207	  	$	195	

For all periods presented, total cash costs include charges for mining ore and waste associated with current period gold production, processing ore through milling and leaching facilities, by-product credits, production taxes, royalties and other cash costs. Certain gold mines produce silver as a by-product. Proceeds from the sale of by-products are reflected as credits to total cash costs. With the exception of Nevada, Yanacocha, Kori Kollo, Martha, and Golden Grove, such by-product sales have not been significant to the economics or profitability of the Company’s mining operations. All of these charges and by-product credits are included in Costs applicable to sales. Charges for reclamation/accretion expense and write downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads are also included in Costs applicable to sales, but are not included in total cash costs. A reconciliation of total cash costs to Costs applicable to sales in total and by segment is provided below.
 
Disclosure of total cash costs per ounce is intended to provide investors with information about the cash generating capacities of these mining operations. Newmont’s management uses this measure for the same purpose and for monitoring the performance of its gold mining operations. This information differs from measures of performance determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting policies (“GAAP”) and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance determined in accordance with GAAP. This measure was developed in conjunction with gold mining companies associated with the Gold Institute in an effort to provide a level of comparability; however, Newmont’s measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
 
56

Reconciliation of Costs applicable to sales (“CAS”) to total cash costs per ounce (unaudited):
 
 	  	Nevada
	 	 	Mesquite
	 	 	La Herradura
	 	 	Golden Giant
	 	
For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	  	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	138.3	 	 	$	155.1	 	 	$	2.4	 	 	$	2.1	 	 	$	3.5	 	 	$	2.8	 	 	$	13.7	 	  	$	13.6	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	—	 	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(1.5	)	 	 	(1.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.3	)	  	 	(0.5	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	(7.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	(3.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				  				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	133.7	 	 	$	145.6	 	 	$	2.4	 	 	$	2.1	 	 	$	3.6	 	 	$	2.7	 	 	$	13.4	 	  	$	13.1	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	535.3	 	 	 	599.0	 	 	 	15.6	 	 	 	12.4	 	 	 	17.8	 	 	 	15.2	 	 	 	53.8	 	  	 	78.5	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	254	 	 	$	243	 	 	$	153	 	 	$	164	 	 	$	201	 	 	$	180	 	 	$	248	 	  	$	166	 	
					
 	  	Holloway
	 	 	Total
North America
	 	 	Yanacocha
	 	 	Kori Kollo
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	  	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	4.7	 	 	$	5.1	 	 	$	162.6	 	 	$	178.7	 	 	$	83.5	 	 	$	69.5	 	 	$	11.2	 	  	$	11.3	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(42.2	)	 	 	(34.6	)	 	 	(1.3	)	  	 	(1.3	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(0.2	)	 	 	(0.2	)	 	 	(2.0	)	 	 	(2.2	)	 	 	(0.9	)	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	(0.7	)	  	 	(0.3	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(7.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3.0	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				  				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	4.5	 	 	$	4.9	 	 	$	157.6	 	 	$	168.4	 	 	$	40.5	 	 	$	34.5	 	 	$	9.2	 	  	$	9.7	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	14.6	 	 	 	23.1	 	 	 	637.1	 	 	 	728.2	 	 	 	343.7	 	 	 	245.4	 	 	 	48.9	 	  	 	66.4	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	310	 	 	$	218	 	 	$	251	 	 	$	231	 	 	$	118	 	 	$	141	 	 	$	188	 	  	$	146	 	
					
 	  	Total
South America
	 	 	Pajingo
	 	 	Yandal
	 	 	Tanami
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	  	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	94.7	 	 	$	80.8	 	 	$	12.2	 	 	$	7.6	 	 	$	45.4	 	 	$	39.0	 	 	$	46.7	 	  	$	32.3	 	
Minority interest	  	 	(43.5	)	 	 	(35.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	  	 	(4.7	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(1.6	)	 	 	(1.0	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(1.0	)	 	 	(0.5	)	  	 	(0.8	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	(0.8	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.7	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(2.1	)	  	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	0.1	 	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	0.4	 	  	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				  				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	49.7	 	 	$	44.2	 	 	$	12.3	 	 	$	7.0	 	 	$	43.3	 	 	$	37.8	 	 	$	44.6	 	  	$	26.0	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	392.6	 	 	 	311.8	 	 	 	93.8	 	 	 	74.4	 	 	 	141.9	 	 	 	166.6	 	 	 	190.7	 	  	 	131.2	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	127	 	 	$	142	 	 	$	132	 	 	$	95	 	 	$	305	 	 	$	227	 	 	$	232	 	  	$	199	 	
					
 	  	Kalgoorlie
	 	 	Total Australia
	 	 	Minahasa
	 	 	Martha
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	  	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	29.7	 	 	$	19.6	 	 	$	134.0	 	 	$	98.5	 	 	$	7.7	 	 	$	9.0	 	 	$	7.8	 	  	$	3.9	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	(4.7	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(0.5	)	 	 	(1.3	)	 	 	(2.6	)	 	 	(0.2	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	—	 	  	 	—	 	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	 	 	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	(0.4	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	(1.0	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4.8	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.2	 	  	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	0.1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.6	 	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(0.5	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	—	 	  	 	(0.1	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				  				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	28.4	 	 	$	18.7	 	 	$	128.6	 	 	$	89.5	 	 	$	7.0	 	 	$	8.4	 	 	$	6.6	 	  	$	3.4	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	104.2	 	 	 	85.4	 	 	 	530.6	 	 	 	457.6	 	 	 	26.4	 	 	 	44.0	 	 	 	27.7	 	  	 	32.1	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	272	 	 	$	219	 	 	$	242	 	 	$	196	 	 	$	267	 	 	$	193	 	 	$	237	 	  	$	104	 	
 
57

 	  	Ovacik
	 	 	Zarafshan-
Newmont
	 	 	Total Other
International
	 	 	Total Gold
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	  	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	6.4	 	 	$	4.2	 	 	$	9.4	 	 	$	9.9	 	 	$	31.3	 	 	$	27.0	 	 	$	   422.6	 	  	$	   385.0	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(43.4	)	  	 	(40.6	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	—	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(5.2	)	  	 	(6.2	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	—	 	  	 	(2.6	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(6.0	)	  	 	(7.5	)	
Other	  	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	(0.2	)	 	 	(3.0	)	  	 	(0.3	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				  				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	6.3	 	 	$	3.7	 	 	$	9.2	 	 	$	10.2	 	 	$	29.1	 	 	$	25.7	 	 	$	365.0	 	  	$	327.8	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	51.2	 	 	 	31.2	 	 	 	61.6	 	 	 	71.3	 	 	 	166.9	 	 	 	178.6	 	 	 	1,727.2	 	  	 	1,676.2	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	123	 	 	$	120	 	 	$	150	 	 	$	142	 	 	$	175	 	 	$	144	 	 	$	212	 	  	$	196	 	
					
 	  	Golden Grove
	 	 	Kasese
	 	 	Other Non-Gold
	 	 	Consolidated
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	  	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	9.7	 	 	$	4.5	 	 	$	 —	 	 	$	4.1	 	 	$	1.3	 	 	$	(1.5	)	 	$	   433.6	 	  	$	   392.1	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(43.4	)	  	 	(40.6	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(5.2	)	  	 	(6.2	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	  	 	(2.6	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stock piles and ore on leach pads	  	 	(3.5	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(9.5	)	  	 	(7.6	)	
Other	  	 	(6.2	)	 	 	(4.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4.1	)	 	 	(1.3	)	 	 	1.5	 	 	 	(10.5	)	  	 	(7.3	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				  				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	365.0	 	  	$	327.8	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,727.2	 	  	 	1,676.2	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	$	 	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	212	 	  	$	196	 	
 
Reconciliation of Costs applicable to sales (“CAS”) to total cash costs per ounce (unaudited):
 
 	  	Nevada
	 	 	Mesquite
	 	 	La Herradura
	 	 	Golden Giant
	 	
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	283.8	 	 	$	309.5	 	 	$	5.0	 	 	$	4.5	 	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	30.4	 	 	$	  27.3	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(3.1	)	 	 	(2.9	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.8	)	 	 	(0.8	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	(1.5	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	(1.0	)	 	 	(15.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	(3.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	276.6	 	 	$	289.8	 	 	$	4.9	 	 	$	4.5	 	 	$	5.7	 	 	$	5.6	 	 	$	29.6	 	 	$	26.5	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	1,168.2	 	 	 	1,205.1	 	 	 	30.2	 	 	 	27.9	 	 	 	34.4	 	 	 	30.8	 	 	 	119.0	 	 	 	140.8	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	239	 	 	$	240	 	 	$	163	 	 	$	160	 	 	$	166	 	 	$	181	 	 	$	   249	 	 	$	188	 	
					
 	  	Holloway
	 	 	Total
North America
	 	 	Yanacocha
	 	 	Kori Kollo
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	10.1	 	 	$	10.7	 	 	$	335.0	 	 	$	357.7	 	 	$	169.0	 	 	$	138.7	 	 	$	21.8	 	 	$	22.8	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(85.4	)	 	 	(69.6	)	 	 	(2.6	)	 	 	(2.7	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(4.3	)	 	 	(4.1	)	 	 	(1.7	)	 	 	(1.5	)	 	 	(1.1	)	 	 	(0.5	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.5	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.0	)	 	 	(15.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	0.9	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	9.8	 	 	$	10.4	 	 	$	326.6	 	 	$	336.8	 	 	$	82.1	 	 	$	68.5	 	 	$	18.1	 	 	$	19.6	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	32.7	 	 	 	51.0	 	 	 	1,384.5	 	 	 	1,455.6	 	 	 	678.8	 	 	 	493.5	 	 	 	100.7	 	 	 	127.0	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	301	 	 	$	205	 	 	$	238	 	 	$	231	 	 	$	121	 	 	$	139	 	 	$	180	 	 	$	154	 	
 
58

 	  	Total
South America
	 	 	Pajingo
	 	 	Yandal
	 	 	Tanami
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	190.8	 	 	$	161.5	 	 	$	20.6	 	 	$	12.8	 	 	$	85.1	 	 	$	56.2	 	 	$	78.3	 	 	$	45.1	 	
Minority interest	  	 	(88.0	)	 	 	(72.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4.3	)	 	 	(6.4	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(2.8	)	 	 	(2.0	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.5	)	 	 	(1.1	)	 	 	(1.5	)	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(1.0	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.8	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.1	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(2.4	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(2.1	)	 	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	0.2	 	 	 	0.9	 	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	—	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	100.2	 	 	$	88.1	 	 	$	20.7	 	 	$	11.4	 	 	$	81.6	 	 	$	53.8	 	 	$	71.7	 	 	$	36.6	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	779.5	 	 	 	620.5	 	 	 	167.8	 	 	 	131.4	 	 	 	281.2	 	 	 	253.7	 	 	 	296.2	 	 	 	184.7	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	129	 	 	$	142	 	 	$	124	 	 	$	88	 	 	$	290	 	 	$	212	 	 	$	242	 	 	$	198	 	
					
 	  	Kalgoorlie
	 	 	Total Australia
	 	 	Minahasa
	 	 	Martha
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	52.1	 	 	$	30.4	 	 	$	236.1	 	 	$	144.5	 	 	$	17.1	 	 	$	17.3	 	 	$	13.9	 	 	$	6.8	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4.3	)	 	 	(6.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	—	 	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(0.8	)	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	(2.4	)	 	 	(3.7	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(0.6	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.2	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	(2.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.5	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	(1.0	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(5.5	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	(1.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(2.6	)	 	 	—	 	
Other	  	 	0.1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.5	 	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(1.0	)	 	 	(0.5	)	 	 	0.1	 	 	 	(0.1	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	50.4	 	 	$	27.6	 	 	$	224.4	 	 	$	129.4	 	 	$	14.5	 	 	$	16.2	 	 	$	10.9	 	 	$	6.0	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	193.2	 	 	 	126.5	 	 	 	938.4	 	 	 	696.3	 	 	 	58.1	 	 	 	85.8	 	 	 	47.3	 	 	 	46.6	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	261	 	 	$	217	 	 	$	239	 	 	$	186	 	 	$	250	 	 	$	188	 	 	$	229	 	 	$	129	 	
					
 	  	Ovacik
	 	 	Zarafshan-
Newmont
	 	 	Total Other
International
	 	 	Total Gold
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	10.8	 	 	$	7.2	 	 	$	18.0	 	 	$	17.4	 	 	$	59.8	 	 	$	48.7	 	 	$	   821.7	 	 	$	   712.4	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(92.7	)	 	 	(78.7	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.2	)	 	 	(0.2	)	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	(1.1	)	 	 	(10.2	)	 	 	(10.9	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	(0.6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(6.9	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3.9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(10.4	)	 	 	(15.6	)	
Other	  	 	—	 	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.3	 	 	 	(0.9	)	 	 	(0.4	)	 	 	(3.3	)	 	 	0.1	 	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	10.7	 	 	$	6.3	 	 	$	17.8	 	 	$	17.6	 	 	$	53.9	 	 	$	46.1	 	 	$	705.1	 	 	$	600.4	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	86.2	 	 	 	48.0	 	 	 	121.7	 	 	 	123.7	 	 	 	313.3	 	 	 	304.1	 	 	 	3,415.7	 	 	 	3,076.5	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	125	 	 	$	132	 	 	$	146	 	 	$	142	 	 	$	172	 	 	$	152	 	 	$	207	 	 	$	195	 	
					
 	  	Golden Grove
	 	 	Kasese
	 	 	Other
Non-Gold
	 	 	Consolidated
	 	
 	  	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	 	2003
	 	 	2002
	 	
 	  	(in millions)	 	
Costs applicable to sales per financial statements	  	$	24.9	 	 	$	13.1	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	6.1	 	 	$	1.4	 	 	$	(0.2	)	 	$	848.0	 	 	$	731.4	 	
Minority interest	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(92.7	)	 	 	(78.7	)	
Reclamation/accretion expense	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(10.2	)	 	 	(10.9	)	
Non-cash inventory adjustment	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(6.9	)	
Write-downs of inventories, stockpiles and ore on leach pads	  	 	(6.8	)	 	 	(0.3	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(17.2	)	 	 	(15.9	)	
Other	  	 	(18.1	)	 	 	(12.8	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(6.1	)	 	 	(1.4	)	 	 	0.2	 	 	 	(22.8	)	 	 	(18.6	)	
 	  				 				 				 				 				 				 				 				
Total cash cost for per ounce calculation	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	705.1	 	 	$	600.4	 	
Equity ounces sold (000)	  	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	3,415.7	 	 	 	3,076.5	 	
Equity cash cost per ounce sold	  	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	 	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	207	 	 	$	195	 	
 
59

North American Operations
 
Gold sales at the Nevada Operations in the second quarter of 2003 were 535,300 ounces at total cash costs of $254 per ounce, compared to 599,000 ounces in the second quarter of 2002 at total cash costs of $243 per ounce. Gold sales during the first half of 2003 were 1,168,200 ounces at total cash costs of $239 per ounce, compared to 1,205,100 ounces at total cash costs of $240 per ounce during the first half of 2002. The decline in gold sales of 63,700 in the second quarter of 2003, compared to the second quarter of 2002, is primarily attributable to lower-than-planned production from the Deep Post underground mine due to ground control issues, unplanned maintenance at the Twin Creeks Autoclave, and a 57% reduction in oxide production due to the temporary shutdown in January of 2003 of Mill 5 at Carlin and lower grade oxide ore at Twin Creeks. Mill 5 recommenced production in June 2003. Refractory production also decreased 13% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same quarter in 2002 due to lower throughput attributable to a 23% reduction in milled ore mined from redeployment of the mining fleet for stripping of the Gold Quarry South Layback project. The reduction in throughput was partially offset by a 17% increase in mill feed grade and a 5% increase in recovery. Leach production in Nevada declined 15% in the second quarter of 2003, compared to the same period in 2002, primarily because of a 14% decrease in ore grade, partially offset by a 30% increase in ore placed on the leach pads. During the first half of 2003, Nevada’s gold sales declined by 36,900 ounces compared to the first half of 2003 primarily due to a 41% decline in oxide production from the Mill 5 shutdown in January of 2003 and lower grade and recoveries at Twin Creeks, partially offset by 42% higher throughput from a full six months of production from the high-grade Midas operation that was acquired as part of the Normandy acquisition in February of 2002. Refractory production during the first half of 2003 was consistent with the same period in 2002. Production from increased efficiencies at the Carlin Roaster and higher grade ore at the Twin Creeks autoclaves were offset by lower grade ore at the Lone Tree Complex. Leach production declined 20% during the first half of 2003, compared to the same period in 2002, primarily due to less tons placed on the leach pads and lower grade ore. Total cash costs per ounce during the second quarter of 2003 increased $11 per ounce over the same period in 2002 because of the decrease in gold ounces sold, combined with higher pension costs and higher costs related to maintenance for major component rebuilds on equipment and operating supplies associated with stripping activity at GQSL and Section 30 at Twin Creeks. Contracted services also increased to boost production at the Chukar underground mine and for the north/south haul to free up Newmont equipment operators for stripping activity. During the first half of 2003, total cash costs per ounce were consistent with the same period in 2002. The negative impact of reduced gold ounces sold was offset by improved by-product credits. Nevada’s silver by-product credits totaled $3.6 million and $0.0 for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $6.9 million and $1.9 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Nevada’s gold sales for the year 2003 are expected to total approximately 2.55 million ounces at total cash costs per ounce of $228.
 
Hourly waged employees at Newmont’s Carlin, Nevada operations are represented by the Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of the International Union of Operating Engineers, AFL-CIO. On September 30, 2002, the Carlin labor agreement expired. During the last ten months, Newmont has been actively negotiating with the union and has undergone federal mediation in attempts to reach an acceptable contract. On July 23, 2003, with approximately 30% of the represented employees voting, the union rejected Newmont’s proposed contract which would have provided represented employees with more than $17 million in increased compensation and benefits over the three-year life of the proposed agreement. Future meetings between Newmont and the union bargaining teams have not been scheduled at this time. Newmont’s Carlin Trend mines continue normal operations, as they have since contract negotiations began in September 2002. Furthermore, Newmont has developed contingency plans in case of a work stoppage or strike. Newmont cannot predict when or if it will reach an agreement with the union. If no such agreement is reached or if the negotiations take an excessive amount of time, there may be a heightened risk of a prolonged work stoppage.
 
Golden Giant reported gold sales of 53,800 ounces during the second quarter of 2003 at total cash costs of $248 per ounce, compared to 78,500 ounces at total cash costs of $166 per ounce during the same period in 2002. For the first half of 2003, Golden Giant sold 119,000 ounces at total cash costs of $249 per ounce, compared to 140,800 ounces at total cash costs of $188 per ounce during the first half of 2002. Second quarter 2003 gold sales
 
60

declined by 24,700 ounces primarily from a 26% decline in tons milled from less flexibility in stope sequencing in the mine caused by limited fronts and a 7% decline in ore grade. Gold sales declined by 21,800 ounces during the first half of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 primarily due to a 24% decrease in mill throughput also from diminishing mining fronts and increased stopes being mined simultaneously, partially offset by a 17% increase in mill ore grade. The increase in total cash costs per ounce for both the second quarter and first half of 2003, compared with the same periods in 2002, resulted primarily from appreciation in the Canadian dollar (see Foreign Currency Exchange Rates below) that had the effect of inflating local-currency denominated costs, combined with the declines in gold ounces sold. Golden Giant’s gold sales for the year 2003 are expected to total approximately 230,000 ounces at total cash costs per ounce of $235.
 
Gold sales from the 84.65%-owned Holloway underground mine in Canada declined to 14,600 equity ounces in the second quarter of 2003, compared to 23,100 equity ounces in the second quarter of 2002, and total cash costs increased to $310 per equity ounce in 2003 compared to $218 per equity ounce in 2002. Gold sales were 32,700 equity ounces in the first half of 2003, compared to 51,000 equity ounces in the first half of 2002, and total cash costs increased to $301 per equity ounce in 2003 compared to $205 per equity ounce in 2002. Higher total cash costs in the second quarter and first half of 2003 resulted from declining production attributable to an approximately 25% decline in ore grade due to stope sequencing and a strengthening Canadian dollar (see Foreign Currency Exchange Rates below). Equity gold sales and total cash costs per equity ounce are expected to be approximately 65,000 ounces at $300 respectively, for the year 2003.
 
Gold sales at the Mesquite heap leach mine in southern California were 15,600 ounces at total cash costs of $153 per ounce in the second quarter of 2003, compared to 12,400 ounces at total cash costs of $164 per ounce in the same period of 2002. Gold sales were 30,200 ounces at total cash costs of $163 per ounce in the first half of 2003, compared to 27,900 ounces at total cash costs of $160 per ounce in the same period of 2002. Mining activities ceased in the second quarter of 2001 with the depletion of the ore body, and final gold production from ore on the leach pads is expected in 2004. Gold sales for the year 2003 are expected to total approximately 40,000 ounces at total cash costs of about $160 per ounce, assuming the sale of Mesquite to Western Goldfields Inc. is completed in August 2003 (see Investing Activities).
 
La Herradura, a 44%-owned joint venture in Mexico not operated by the company, sold 17,800 equity ounces in the second quarter of 2003 at total cash costs of $201 per equity ounce compared to 15,200 ounces at total cash costs of $180 per ounce in the second quarter of 2002. Gold sales were 34,400 equity ounces in the first half of 2003 at total cash costs of $166 per equity ounce compared to 30,800 ounces at total cash costs of $181 per ounce in the first half of 2002. Gold sales for the second quarter and the first half of 2003 increased over the same periods in 2002 from capital investment that led to faster mining rates and increased ore placement on the leach pads. Total cash costs per ounce in the second quarter of 2003 increased over the same period in 2002 from increased mining and leaching costs, while total cash costs for the first half of 2003 decreased compared to 2002 primarily due to the increase in gold ounces sold and from reduced manpower, purchasing lower cost consumables and initiating a new recirculation system that reduced the consumption of cyanide. Gold sales for the year 2003 are expected to be approximately 70,000 equity ounces at total cash costs of about $175 per equity ounce.
 
South American Operations
 
Sales at the 51.35%-owned Minera Yanacocha S.R.L. (“Yanacocha”) in Peru increased 40% in the second quarter of 2003 to 343,700 equity ounces from 245,400 equity ounces in the second quarter of 2002. Total cash costs per equity ounce decreased to $118 in the second quarter of 2003 from $141 in 2002. For the first half of 2003, equity gold sales were 678,800 ounces at total cash costs of $121 per ounce, compared to 493,500 ounces at total cash costs of $139 per ounce during the first half of 2002. The second quarter 2003 increase in production is primarily attributable to a 19% increase in ore grade, primarily from La Quinua and Carachugo, and a 12% increase in ore placed on the leach pads. The increase during the first half of 2003 compared to 2002 is primarily attributable to a 27% increase in ore grade and a 9% increase in ore placed on the leach pads; both variances are primarily related to the La Quinua pit. Total cash costs per ounce in the second quarter of 2003 dropped in
 
61

comparison with the same period in 2002 because of the increase in gold ounces sold, partially offset by higher diesel fuel prices, higher consumption of lime and cyanide, lower by-product credits and an increase in workers’ participation bonuses. Total cash costs per equity ounce for the first half of 2003 decreased compared to the same period in 2002 primarily due to the increase in gold ounces sold, partially offset by higher workers’ participation bonuses. By-product credits for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were $4.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively, and $6.8 million and $3.6 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Yanacocha is expected to sell approximately 1.4 million equity ounces of gold for the year 2003 at total cash costs of about $117 per equity ounce.
 
At the 88%-owned Kori Kollo open-pit mine in Bolivia, gold sales totaled 48,900 equity ounces in the second quarter of 2003 at total cash costs of $188 per equity ounce, compared to 66,400 equity ounces in the second quarter of 2002 at a total cash costs of $146 per equity ounce. Gold sales and total cash costs were 100,700 equity ounces and $180 per equity ounce, respectively, in the first half of 2003, compared to 127,000 equity ounces at $154 per equity ounce in the first half of 2002. 25% lower mill feed grade and 25% lower ore placed on the leach pads were the primary factors contributing to lower production during the second quarter of 2003. Similar factors led to the decline in production for the first half of 2003. Total cash costs per ounce increased by $42 per ounce during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 because of the decline in equity gold sales and higher fuel, maintenance and contracted services costs. The increase in total cash costs per equity ounce during the first half of 2003 compared to the first half of 2002 was primarily attributable to the reduction in equity gold ounces sold, partially offset by reduced consumption of reagents and spare parts. By-product credits for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were $0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively, and $1.6 million and $1.2 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the year 2003, equity gold sales are expected to total approximately 150,000 equity ounces at total cash costs of about $200 per equity ounce.
 
Australian Operations
 
Information related to Australian operations for the first half of 2002 reflects activity from February 16, 2002 (as the Normandy acquisition was effective February 15, 2002) through June 30, 2002, with the exception of Pajingo, which was 50% owned by Newmont prior to the acquisition of Normandy. In general, total cash costs per ounce at Australian operations increased in 2003 due to a strengthening Australian dollar, higher fuel costs and higher shared service and administrative costs.
 
At the Pajingo mine in North Queensland, gold sales for the second quarter of 2003 were 93,800 ounces at total cash costs of $132 per ounce, compared to 74,400 equity ounces and total cash costs of $95 per equity ounce in the second quarter of 2002. Gold sales were 167,800 ounces for the first half of 2003 at total cash costs of $124 per ounce, compared to the first half of 2002 sales and total cash costs of 131,400 ounces and $88 per ounce, respectively. Production in 2003 reflects 100% ownership of Pajingo for the entire first quarter, whereas Newmont owned only 50% of Pajingo for half of the first quarter in 2002 prior to the Normandy acquisition. Gold sales increased in the second quarter of 2003 by 19,400 ounces compared to the same period in 2002 primarily due to a 23% increase in mill ore grade and a 14% increase in mill throughput attributable to poor ground conditions in 2002 in one of the production stopes that reduced ore availability, causing low-grade ore to be milled. Gold sales for the first half of 2003 increased by 36,400 ounces primarily due to an 11% increase in ore grade and a 16% increase in mill throughput. Total cash costs per ounce at Pajingo increased by $37 during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. In addition to the effects of appreciation of the Australian dollar, the operation incurred higher mining costs from 13% increase in the volume of ore mined, along with higher grinding media costs from higher mill throughput and increased overhead charges, partially offset by increased gold ounces sold. Total cash costs per ounce for the first half of 2003 increased by $36 for the same factors, including an 18% increase in the volume of ore mined. In addition, production and cash costs at Pajingo were adversely affected in the first quarter of 2003 by a shortfall of high-grade ore due to a delay in the development schedule of the Jandam and Vera South Deeps areas, resulting in supplemental production from lower-grade ore stockpiles. For the year 2003, gold sales are estimated at approximately 325,000 ounces at total cash costs of $135 per ounce.
 
62

At the Yandal operations, which consist of the Bronzewing, Jundee and Wiluna mines in Western Australia, gold sales for the second quarter of 2003 totaled 141,900 ounces at a total cash cost of $305 per ounce, compared to 166,600 ounces at $227 per ounce in second quarter of 2002. Total cash costs were $290 per ounce for the first half of 2003 on sales of 281,200 ounces, compared to $212 per ounce for the first half of 2003 on sales of 253,700 ounces. The decrease in gold ounces sold in the second quarter of 2003 of 24,700 ounces compared to the second quarter of 2002 resulted primarily from a 34% decrease in mill ore grade at Jundee and the closure of underground operations at the higher grade Lotus ore body at Bronzewing. The increase in gold ounces sold of 27,500 ounces during the first half of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 resulted primarily from a 31% increase in mill throughput from a full six months of production in 2003, partially offset by a 21% decrease in mill ore grade driven by lower grades at all three sites. The increase in total cash costs per ounce of $78 per ounce during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 is primarily due to the appreciation in the Australian dollar, decreased gold ounces sold, unplanned maintenance at Wiluna and the Nimary plant, higher power costs at Wiluna, increased underground activities at both Jundee and Wiluna and draw downs of higher cost stockpiles and other inventories. Total cash costs per ounce increased $78 per ounce for the first half of 2003 compared to the same period in 2003 primarily due to increased underground activities at Jundee and Wiluna, partially offset by higher gold ounces sold. Sales for 2003 are expected to total 595,000 ounces at cash costs per ounce of about $275 per ounce.
 
The Tanami operations in the Northern Territory sold 190,700 equity gold ounces at total cash costs of $232 per equity ounce during the second quarter of 2003, compared to 131,200 equity ounces at $199 per equity ounce in the second quarter of 2002. Gold sales were 296,200 equity ounces for the first half of 2003 at total cash costs of $242 per ounce, compared to 184,700 equity ounces at total cash costs of $198 per ounce during the first half of 2002. During the second quarter of 2003, gold sales increased by 59,500 ounces compared to the second quarter of 2002 primarily due to an increase in ownership resulting from the second quarter Newmont NFM Limited Scheme of Arrangement (see Other Investing Activities ) and a 10% increase in mill ore grade. For the first half of 2003, gold sales increased by 111,500 ounces compared to the same period in 2002 due to the increase in ownership and a 39% increase in mill throughput and moderately higher mill ore grade. Total cash costs per equity ounce increased by $33 in the second quarter of 2003 primarily due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar, higher royalties from higher gold prices and increases in the severance accrual and overhead charges, partially offset by increased gold ounces sold. Total cash costs per ounce for the first half of 2003 increased by $44 compared to the same period in 2002 primarily from the appreciation of the Australian dollar and additional underground haulage costs as the mining operations at Callie to extend deeper into the ore body, partially offset by increased gold ounces sold. For the year 2003, Tanami operations are expected to sell approximately 580,000 equity ounces of gold at total cash costs of approximately $260 per equity ounce.
 
For the second quarter of 2003, equity gold sales at the 50%-owned Kalgoorlie operations in Western Australia totaled 104,200 ounces at total cash costs of $272 per equity ounce. Equity gold sales for the second quarter of 2002 were 85,400 ounces at total cash costs of $219 per equity ounce. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, equity gold sales were 193,200 ounces at total cash costs of $261 per ounce, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2002 equity sales of 126,500 at total cash costs of $217 per ounce. Second quarter 2003 gold sales increased by 18,800 ounces compared to the same period in 2002 primarily because of a 30% increase in mill ore grade and a 3% increase in recoveries from mill optimization work completed in 2002. Gold sales for the first half of 2003 increased by 66,700 ounces primarily due to a 26% increase in mill throughput and a 20% increase in mill ore grade, as well as having a full six months of production compared to a partial period in 2002. Total cash costs per ounce were $53 higher in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 primarily due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar, increased activity at the Mt. Charlotte underground mine, increased open pit costs from unplanned equipment rental, additional drilling in preparation for a new shovel and increased processing costs from the acceleration of maintenance, partially offset by higher gold ounces sold. For the first half of 2003, total cash costs per ounce increased by $44 primarily due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar and the increase in mining activity at the Mt. Charlotte underground mine, partially offset by increased gold ounces sold. Equity gold sales and total cash costs per equity ounce for 2003 are expected to total approximately 380,000 equity ounces at total cash costs of about $290, respectively.
 
63

Other Mining Operations
 
Gold Operations
 
Information related to Martha, Ovacik, Golden Grove and TVX Newmont Americas for the first half of 2002 reflects activity from February 16, 2002 (as the Normandy acquisition was effective February 15, 2002) through June 30, 2002. Information related to Echo Bay in 2002 only reflects activity from April 3, 2002 (the date Newmont’s investment was converted from capital debt securities to common shares of Echo Bay) through June 30, 2002. Information related to TVX Newmont Americas and Echo Bay for 2003 reflects activity from January 1, 2003, to January 31, 2003 only when the investments were sold and exchanged, respectively, as part of the Kinross transaction (See Other Investing Activities ).
 
At the Minahasa mine in Indonesia, Newmont has an 80% interest but receives a greater percent of the gold production until recouping the bulk of its investment including interest. For the second quarter of 2003, sales decreased to 26,400 equity ounces at a total cash cost of $267 per equity ounce from 44,000 equity ounces at a total cash cost of $193 per ounce in the second quarter of 2002. Sales for the first half of 2003 decreased to 58,100 equity ounces and total cash costs of $250 per ounce, from 85,800 equity ounces with total cash costs of $188 per ounce in the first half of 2002. Gold sales declined by 17,600 ounces in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 primarily due to a 35% decrease in ore grade. The decrease of 27,700 ounces during the first half of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 resulted primarily from a 29% decrease in ore grade, partially offset by an 8% increase in mill throughput. Total cash costs per ounce increased by $74 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 primarily due to higher consumables, higher diesel fuel prices and higher contracted services, as well as the decline in gold ounces sold. Total cash costs per ounce for the first half of 2003 increased by $62 per ounce primarily due to the same factors as described for the second quarter. Mining activities ceased late in 2001; however, it is expected that processing of the remaining stockpiles will continue until April 2004. Production for the year 2003 is expected at approximately 100,000 equity ounces, with total cash costs of approximately $260 per equity ounce.
 
The Zarafshan-Newmont Joint Venture (“Zarafshan”) in the Central Asian Republic of Uzbekistan, in which Newmont has a 50% interest, sold 61,600 equity ounces in the second quarter of 2003 at total cash costs of $150 per equity ounce. In the second quarter of 2002, Zarafshan sold 71,300 equity ounces at total cash costs of $142 per equity ounce. Gold sales were 121,700 equity ounces with total cash costs of $146 per equity ounce during the first half of 2003, compared to equity sales of 123,700 ounces at total cash costs of $142 per equity ounce during the first half of 2002. The decline in gold sales of 9,700 ounces in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 resulted primarily from a 17% decline in ore grade, partially offset by a 4% increase in tons placed on the pads. For the first half of 2003, gold sales were comparable with the same period of 2002 as a 13% decline in ore grade was largely offset by a 5% increase in ore placed on the leach pads. The lower ore grade is expected to continue during 2003. The $8 per equity ounce increase in total cash costs in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 is primarily a result of the decrease in gold ounces sold. Total cash costs per equity ounce for the first half of 2003 are consistent with the costs for the first half of 2002. Zarafshan is expected to sell approximately 220,000 equity ounces at total cash costs of $150 per equity ounce for the year 2003.
 
Equity sales at Martha, located in New Zealand, were 27,700 equity ounces at total cash costs per equity ounce of $237 during the second quarter of 2003 compared to 32,100 equity ounces at total cash costs of $104 per equity ounce during the second quarter of 2002. Equity sales during the six months ended June 30, 2003 were 47,300 ounces at total cash costs of $229 per equity ounce, compared to equity sales for the six months ended June 30, 2002 of 46,600 ounces at total cash costs of $129 per equity ounce. The reduction in gold sales during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 of 4,400 equity ounces resulted primarily from a 33% decline in ore grade, partially offset by a 3% increase in tons milled. Gold sales for the first half of 2003 were consistent with the same period in 2002, despite the fact that 2002 included only four and one-half months of production. This is attributable to an 18% decline in ore grade, partially offset by a 27% increase in mill throughput. The increase in total cash costs per equity ounce of $133 in the second quarter of 2003
 
64

compared to the same period in 2002 resulted primarily from appreciation of the New Zealand dollar (see Foreign Currency Exchange Rates ), decreased gold ounces sold, increased milling costs from higher electricity rates, higher consumption of grinding media, an earlier than planned SAG mill liner replacement and higher cyanide consumption. Total cash costs for the first half of 2003 increased by $100 per equity ounce compared to the same period in 2002 for the same reasons, except that gold ounces sold did not decline. By-product credits for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were $0.8 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and $1.7 million and $1.2 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Gold sales in 2003 at Martha are expected to be approximately 95,000 equity ounces at total cash costs of about $265 per equity ounce.
 
At the Ovacik mine in Turkey, gold sales for the second quarter of 2003 were 51,200 ounces at total cash costs per ounce of $123, compared to 31,200 ounces at a total cash costs of $120 per ounce in 2002. Gold sales for the first half of 2003 were 86,200 ounces at total cash costs of $125 per ounce, compared to 48,000 ounces at total cash costs of $132 per ounce during the first half of 2002. The increase in gold sales of 20,000 ounces in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 was primarily attributable to a 64% increase in mill throughput resulting from a revised mine plan that incorporates an open pit extension and increased mill efficiencies. For the first half of 2003, Ovacik increased gold sales by 38,200 ounces primarily from a 107% increase in mill throughput due to the same factors. Total cash costs per ounce were consistent in the second quarter and first half of 2003 compared to the same periods in 2002 as the positive impact of increased gold sales was offset by higher processing costs associated with increased throughput. Gold sales for the year 2003 are expected to be approximately 160,000 ounces at total cash costs of about $130 per ounce.
 
Newmont acquired certain Echo Bay Mines Ltd. (Echo Bay”) capital securities in connection with its acquisition of Franco-Nevada. Subsequent to this acquisition, an agreement was reached with Echo Bay and the capital securities holders to exchange the capital securities for common stock of Echo Bay. This exchange of capital securities debt obligations for common stock occurred on April 3, 2002 and resulted in Newmont Mining Corporation of Canada Limited (a wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont) owning 48.8% of Echo Bay. From April 3, 2002, Newmont accounted for its investment in Echo Bay under the equity method. On January 31, 2003, Kinross Gold Corporation, Echo Bay and TVX Gold Inc. were combined, and TVX Gold acquired Newmont’s 49.9% interest in the TVX Newmont Americas joint venture. Under the terms of the combination and acquisition, Newmont received a 13.8% interest in the restructured Kinross in exchange for its then 45.67% interest in Echo Bay and $180 million for its interest in the TVX Newmont Americas joint venture. Cash proceeds of $170.6 million were received in the three month period ended March 31, 2003, with the remaining $9.4 million held in escrow until received in April 2003. Newmont recorded a gain of approximately $84.3 million on the sale of Echo Bay.
 
The TVX Newmont Americas joint venture was 49.9%-owned by Newmont and 50.1%-owned by TVX Gold Inc. and was treated as an equity investment for reporting purposes in 2002 and through January 31, 2003. The principal assets of TVX Newmont Americas are interests in operating gold mines in South America (Paracatu, Crixas and La Coipa) and Canada (Musselwhite and New Britannia). On January 31, 2003, Newmont sold its 49.9% interest in TVX Newmont Americas to TVX Gold Inc. for $180 million as described above.
 
Base Metal Operations
 
At the Batu Hijau mine in Indonesia, copper sales totaled 91.2 million equity pounds (pounds attributable to Newmont’s economic interest) in the second quarter of 2003, compared to 89.3 million equity pounds in the second quarter of 2002. Net cash costs were $0.21 and $0.31 per equity pound, after gold and silver by-product credits, in the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the first halves of 2003 and 2002, copper sales and cash costs were 161.0 million and 156.9 million equity pounds and $0.25 and $0.36 per pound, after gold sales credits, respectively.
 
Newmont holds an indirect 45% equity interest in the mine, but is attributed 56.25% of production until recouping loans to minority interest holders, including interest. Equity copper sales improved in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 by 1.9 million pounds primarily from a 7% increase in ore grade, partially offset by 7% reduction in dry tons processed. Equity copper sales for the first half of 2003 improved by 4.1 million pounds due primarily to a 7% increase in ore grade. Net cash costs improved in 2003 as
 
65

compared to 2002 primarily due to higher gold by-product credits reflecting higher gold prices, improvement in ore grade and lower smelting and refining charges. Gold sales, accounted for as by-product credits, totaled 91,900 and 146,200 equity ounces for the second quarter and first half of 2003, respectively, compared to 63,000 and 103,300 ounces for the same periods in 2002. The Company’s equity income from Batu Hijau includes gold and silver revenues that are credited against costs applicable to sales as by-product credits in the determination of net income for each period presented in the Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income . These by-product credits represented 57% and 40% of sales, net of smelting and refining charges, and reduced production costs by 79% and 57% for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively. By-product credits represented 52% and 36% of sales, net of smelting and refining charges, and reduced production costs by 71% and 49% for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Such by-product credits are expected to continue through the end of 2020. These by-product credits are expected to vary from time to time and are significant to the economics of the Batu Hijau operation. At current copper prices, the Batu Hijau operation would not be profitable without these credits. Sales for the year 2003 are expected to total approximately 340 million to 360 million equity pounds of copper and 290,000 equity ounces of gold. Total cash costs of copper for the year 2003 are expected to be between $0.26 and $0.28 per equity pound.
 
The wholly-owned Golden Grove copper/zinc operation in Western Australia, which was acquired as part of the Normandy acquisition, sold 16.2 million pounds of copper and 28.7 million pounds of zinc in the second quarter of 2003, compared to 14.9 million pounds of copper and 69.4 million pounds of zinc in the second quarter of 2002. For the first half of 2003, copper and zinc sales were 37.5 million pounds and 53.6 million pounds, respectively, compared to copper and zinc sales of 25.1 million pounds and 69.4 million pounds, respectively, during the first half of 2002. Total cash costs during the second quarter of 2003 were $0.22 and $0.34 per pound for copper and zinc, respectively, compared to $0.44 and $0.11 for copper and zinc, respectively, in the second quarter of 2002. Total cash costs during the first half of 2003 were $0.39 and $0.36 per pound for copper and zinc, respectively, compared to $0.68 and $0.11 for copper and zinc, respectively, in the first half of 2002. Lead and gold by-product credits at Golden Grove were $6.6 million and $8.3 million during the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $8.1 million and $8.3 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Newmont anticipates Golden Grove will sell between 65 million and 75 million pounds of copper and 130 million to 140 million pounds of zinc for the year 2003 at total cash costs per pound of between $0.63 and $0.68, and between $0.28 and $0.34, respectively.
 
Merchant Banking
 
Newmont’s Merchant Banking Segment is focused on managing the Company’s portfolio of operating, property and equity interests. In addition, Merchant Banking manages the Company’s royalty business and provides investment banking services to the Company.
 
On January 31, 2003, Kinross Gold Corporation (“Kinross”), Echo Bay Mines Ltd. (“Echo Bay”) and TVX Gold Inc. (“TVX Gold”) were combined, and TVX Gold acquired Newmont’s 49.9% interest in the TVX Newmont Americas joint venture. Under the terms of the combination and acquisition and through the efforts of the Merchant Banking Segment, Newmont received a 13.8% interest in the restructured Kinross in exchange for its then 45.67% interest in Echo Bay and $180 million for its interest in TVX Newmont Americas. Cash proceeds of $170.6 million were received immediately after the close of the transaction. The remaining $9.4 million, originally held in escrow, were received subsequent to the end of the first quarter. Newmont recognized a pre-tax gain of $84.3 million on the transaction in Gain on investments, net in the Statement of Consolidated Operations . Newmont classifies its investment in Kinross as a long-term, available-for-sale marketable security. At June 30, 2003, the fair value of the Kinross investment was $291 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2003, a loss of $45.3 million, net of tax, was recorded in Other comprehensive income, net of tax for the change in market value of the investment. During the second quarter of 2003, a loss of $3.2 million, net of tax, was recorded in Other comprehensive income, net of tax for the change in market value of the investment. Newmont will continue to monitor the market value of its investment in Kinross. In the event that the decline in the market value of the Kinross shares continues in future periods, the Company will evaluate the need to recognize a loss for an other-than-temporary decline in the value of the investment.
 
66

Through the efforts of the Merchant Banking Segment, Newmont sold its 9.74% equity holding in Lihir Gold during the second quarter of 2002 through a block trade to Macquarie Equity Capital Markets Limited in Australia for approximately $84 million, resulting in the recognition of a pre-tax gain of approximately $47.3 million.
 
Merchant Banking also managed the process of extinguishing the majority of NYOL’s bonds and derivatives liability during the second quarter of 2003. On May 29, 2003, Newmont, through its subsidiary Yandal Bond Company Pty Ltd (“YBCL”), made an offer to acquire all of NYOL’s outstanding 8  7 / 8 % Senior Notes due in April 2008 at a price of $500 per $1,000 principal amount. As of June 30, 2003, YBCL had received binding tender offers for the Senior Notes totaling $196.8 million, representing 83% of the original $237.2 million outstanding principal amount (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations). Newmont recorded a Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net of $94.4 million for the transaction. Furthermore, on May 28, 2003, YBCL made an offer to acquire all of NYOL’s gold hedge contracts from the counterparties at a rate of $0.50 per $1.00 of net mark-to-market hedge liability as of May 22, 2003. Six of the total of seven counterparties to the gold hedge contracts, representing 94% of the gold ounces in the NYOL hedge book and 76% of the mark-to-market May 22, 2003 hedge liability, had assigned their hedge contracts to YBCL as of June 30, 2003 (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations). Newmont recorded a Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net of $76.6 million for the transaction.
 
Newmont’s Merchant Banking Segment holds royalty interests, which were acquired as a result of the Franco-Nevada acquisition. Royalty interests are generally in the form of a net smelter return (“NSR”) royalty that provides for the payment either in cash or in-kind physical metal of a specified percentage of production, less certain specified transportation and refining costs. In some cases, Newmont owns a net profit interest (“NPI”) entitling Newmont to a specified percentage of the net profits, as defined in each case, from a particular mining operation. The majority of NSR royalty revenue and NPI revenue can be received in kind at the option of Newmont. Newmont earned $10.5 million of royalty revenue for the second quarter of 2003, compared to $11.2 million in the second quarter of 2002 and $24.9 during the first half of 2003, compared to $15.0 during the first half of 2002. The increase in the first half of 2003 is primarily attributable to a full first quarter of operations compared to a partial first quarter in 2002 and higher prevailing gold and oil and gas market prices. Newmont expects to earn $40 million to $50 million in royalties for the full year 2003.
 
Exploration
 
Exploration and research expenditures were $30.2 million and $51.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 and $18.8 million and $30.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. Of these amounts, $24.0 million and $40.8 million, respectively, related to the activities of the Exploration Segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, with the balance in each year relating primarily to research and advanced project activities not managed by Newmont’s Exploration Segment. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, $15.2 million and $24.1 million, respectively, related to the activities of the Exploration Segment.
 
Exploration expenditures reflect a full six months of exploration activity in 2003 for the combined Newmont and Normandy exploration programs, as compared to four and one-half months in 2002. Expenditures in 2003 also reflect higher funding of exploration activities by Newmont due to higher prevailing gold prices. Newmont is forecasting expenditures of approximately $85 million for the full year 2003. Exploration activities during the first half of 2003 have primarily focused on the Antonio and Corimayo deposits at Minera Yanacocha, the Gold Quarry and Dos Equis deposits in Nevada and various deposits at the Company’s Australian operations. Newmont updates its public disclosure of proven and probable reserves annually as of December 31 of each year. The Company will therefore discuss the additions to proven and probable reserves resulting from its 2003 exploration program in the Company’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Newmont believes that exploration results to date in 2003 indicate the Company is on track to achieve its goal of replacing depletion of approximately 9.0 million ounces during the year.
 
67

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
 
In addition to its domestic operations in the United States, Newmont has operations in Australia, New Zealand, Peru, Indonesia, Canada, Uzbekistan, Bolivia, Turkey and other foreign locations. The Company’s foreign operations sell their metal production based on an U.S. dollar gold price.
 
Fluctuations in the local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar can increase or decrease profit margins and total cash costs per ounce to the extent costs are paid in local currency at foreign operations. Such fluctuations do not have a material impact on the Company’s revenue since gold is sold throughout the world principally in U.S. dollars. Approximately 44% and 39%, of Newmont’s total cash costs were paid in local currency in the three months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. Approximately 42% and 36% of Newmont’s total cash costs were paid in local currency in the six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, respectively. The Company’s total cash costs are most impacted by variations in the Australian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate. However, variations in the Australian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate have historically been strongly correlated to variations in the U.S. dollar gold price over the long-term. Increases or decreases in costs at Australian locations due to exchange rate changes have therefore tended to be mitigated by changes in sales reported in U.S. dollars at Australian locations in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. No assurance, however, can be given that the Australian dollar/U.S. dollar exchange rate will continue to be strongly correlated to the U.S. dollar gold price in the future. The following chart demonstrates the impacts of variations in the local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar at Newmont’s foreign operations during each of the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002.
 
Three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
 
 	  	Three months ended June 30, 2003
	 	 	Three months ended June 30, 2002
	 	
Operation
	  	Percentage
change in
average local
currency
exchange
rate;
appreciation
(depreciation)
	 	 	Increase
(decrease) to
total cash
costs in US
dollars
	 	 	Increase
(decrease)
to total
cash costs
per ounce
in US
dollars
	 	 	Percentage
change in
average local
currency
exchange
rate;
appreciation
(depreciation)
	 	 	Increase
(decrease) to
total cash
costs in US
dollars
	 	 	Increase
(decrease)
to total
cash costs
per ounce
in US
dollars
	 	
 	  	(unaudited)	 	
North America:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
La Herradura	  	(10	)%	 	$	(89,054	)	 	$	(5	)	 	(3	)%	 	$	(33,701	)	 	$	(2	)	
Golden Giant	  	10	%	 	$	1,177,762	 	 	$	22	 	 	(1	)%	 	$	(113,524	)	 	$	(1	)	
Holloway	  	10	%	 	$	488,440	 	 	$	33	 	 	(1	)%	 	$	(39,683	)	 	$	(2	)	
South America:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Minera Yanacocha	  	(1	)%	 	$	(68,183	)	 	$	—	 	 	3	%	 	$	308,329	 	 	$	1	 	
Kori Kollo	  	(8	)%	 	$	(326,510	)	 	$	(7	)	 	(8	)%	 	$	(463,503	)	 	$	(7	)	
Australia(1):	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Pajingo	  	14	%	 	$	1,578,503	 	 	$	17	 	 	7	%	 	$	425,135	 	 	$	6	 	
Kalgoorlie	  	14	%	 	$	4,116,374	 	 	$	39	 	 	7	%	 	$	1,301,416	 	 	$	15	 	
Yandal	  	14	%	 	$	5,440,462	 	 	$	38	 	 	7	%	 	$	2,372,959	 	 	$	14	 	
Tanami	  	14	%	 	$	5,068,265	 	 	$	27	 	 	7	%	 	$	1,589,066	 	 	$	12	 	
Other International:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Zarafshan-Newmont Joint Venture	  	(35	)%	 	$	(1,409,104	)	 	$	(23	)	 	(104	)%	 	$	(4,342,883	)	 	$	(61	)	
Minahasa	  	7	%	 	$	33,988	 	 	$	1	 	 	19	%	 	$	267,367	 	 	$	6	 	
Martha	  	14	%	 	$	1,292,392	 	 	$	47	 	 	7	%	 	$	409,619	 	 	$	13	 	
Ovacik	  	(3	)%	 	$	(77,287	)	 	$	(2	)	 	(21	)%	 	$	(439,301	)	 	$	(14	)	
 
68

Six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
 
 	  	Six months ended June 30, 2003
	 	 	Six months ended June 30, 2002 (1)
	 	
Operation
	  	Percentage
change in
average local
currency
exchange
rate;
appreciation
(depreciation)
	 	 	Increase
(decrease)
to total
cash costs
in US
dollars
(000)
	 	 	Increase
(decrease)
to total
cash costs
per ounce
in US
dollars
	 	 	Percentage
change in
average local
currency
exchange
rate;
appreciation
(depreciation)
	 	 	Increase
(decrease)
to total
cash costs
in US
dollars
(000)
	 	 	Increase
(decrease)
to total
cash costs
per ounce
in US
dollars
	 	
 	  	(unaudited)	 	
North America:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
La Herradura	  	(15	)%	 	$	(243	)	 	$	(7	)	 	2	 %	 	$	31	 	 	$	1	 	
Golden Giant	  	12	 %	 	$	1,997	 	 	$	19	 	 	(2	)%	 	$	(665	)	 	$	(4	)	
Holloway	  	12	 %	 	$	741	 	 	$	25	 	 	(2	)%	 	$	(225	)	 	$	(5	)	
South America:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Minera Yanacocha	  	—	 %	 	$	(146	)	 	$	—	 	 	2	 %	 	$	462	 	 	$	1	 	
Kori Kollo	  	(10	)%	 	$	(705	)	 	$	(7	)	 	(10	)%	 	$	(884	)	 	$	(7	)	
Australia(1):	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Pajingo	  	19	 %	 	$	2,466	 	 	$	13	 	 	4	 %	 	$	322	 	 	$	2	 	
Kalgoorlie	  	19	 %	 	$	7,351	 	 	$	35	 	 	4	 %	 	$	1,099	 	 	$	6	 	
Yandal	  	19	 %	 	$	9,251	 	 	$	33	 	 	4	 %	 	$	1,998	 	 	$	6	 	
Tanami	  	19	 %	 	$	8,501	 	 	$	24	 	 	4	 %	 	$	1,370	 	 	$	5	 	
Other International:	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Zarafshan-Newmont Joint Venture	  	(40	)%	 	$	(3,087	)	 	$	(25	)	 	(117	)%	 	$	(9,321	)	 	$	(65	)	
Minahasa	  	17	 %	 	$	66	 	 	$	1	 	 	7	 %	 	$	189	 	 	$	2	 	
Martha	  	19	 %	 	$	2,059	 	 	$	38	 	 	4	 %	 	$	359	 	 	$	6	 	
Ovacik	  	(11	)%	 	$	(497	)	 	$	(5	)	 	(67	)%	 	$	(888	)	 	$	(14	)	

(1)	 	For operations acquired as part of the acquisition of Normandy, amounts include the impact from February 15, 2002 through June 30, 2002.	
 
In addition, the Company’s total cash costs at Golden Grove varied due to changes in the local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar as follows:
 
Period
	  	Foreign Currency
	  	Percentage change
in average local
currency
exchange rate;
appreciation
	 	 	Increase
(decrease)
to total cash
costs in US
dollars (000)
	
Three months ended June 30, 2003	  	Australian Dollar	  	14	%	 	$	1,660	
Three months ended June 30, 2002	  	Australian Dollar	  	7	%	 	$	372	
Six months ended June 30, 2003	  	Australian Dollar	  	19	%	 	$	2,925	
Six months ended June 30, 2002	  	Australian Dollar	  	4	%	 	$	332	
 
In addition, the Company’s Equity income of affiliates varied due to increases or decreases in costs from changes in the local currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar at the Batu Hijau copper mine in Indonesia as follows:
 
Period
	  	Foreign Currency
	  	Percentage change
in average local
currency
exchange rate;
appreciation
(devaluation)
	 	 	Income (loss)
within Equity
income (loss)
in affiliates,
net (000)
	 	
Three months ended June 30, 2003	  	Indonesian Rupiah	  	7	%	 	$	(707	)	
Three months ended June 30, 2002	  	Indonesian Rupiah	  	19	%	 	$	(1,273	)	
Six months ended June 30, 2003	  	Indonesian Rupiah	  	17	%	 	$	(1,623	)	
Six months ended June 30, 2002	  	Indonesian Rupiah	  	7	%	 	$	(1,046	)	
 
69

The Company does not believe that foreign currency exchange rates in relation to the U.S. dollar have had a material impact on its determination of proven and probable reserves in the past due, in part, to the Company’s use of conservative cut-off grade assumptions for pit and/or mine design. However, in the event that a sustained weakening in the U.S. dollar in relation to the Australian dollar, and/or to other foreign currencies that impact the Company’s cost structure, were not mitigated by offsetting increases in the U.S. dollar gold price or by other factors, the Company believes that the amount of proven and probable reserves in the applicable foreign country would be reduced. The extent of any such reduction would be dependent on a variety of factors including the length of time of any such weakening of the U.S. dollar, and management’s long-term view of the applicable exchange rate. Future reductions of proven and probable reserves would result primarily in reduced gold sales and increased depreciation, depletion and amortization calculated using the units-of-production method and, depending on the level of reduction, could also result in impairments of long-lived assets, mineral reserves and other intangible assets and/or goodwill.
 
Financial Results
 
Newmont’s Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income include the activities of Normandy and Franco-Nevada from February 16, 2002 through June 30, 2002 for the first half of 2002 and for the entire first half of 2003.
 
Sales—gold were $724.0 million and $609.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The following analysis demonstrates that the increase in consolidated sales revenue in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 primarily resulted from higher gold prices and other production increases (unaudited):
 
 	  	Three Months Ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	
Consolidated gold sales (in millions)	  	$	724.0	  	$	609.5	
Consolidated gold ounces sold (000)	  	 	2,065.7	  	 	1,951.6	
Average price realized per ounce	  	$	353	  	$	314	
Average spot price per ounce	  	$	347	  	$	312	
 
Increase in consolidated gold sales due to:
 
 	  	Three Months Ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003 vs. 2002
(in millions)
	
Consolidated production	  	$	37.5	
Average gold price received	  	 	77.0	
 	  			
 	  	$	114.5	

Sales—gold were $1,438.6 million and $1,091.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The following analysis demonstrates that the increase in consolidated sales revenue in the first half of 2003 compared to first half of 2002 primarily resulted from higher gold prices, the inclusion of a full quarter of production from the acquired Normandy properties as compared to a partial quarter in 2002 and other production increases (unaudited):
 
 	  	Six Months Ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	
Consolidated gold sales (in millions)	  	$	1,438.6	  	$	1,091.8	
Consolidated gold ounces sold (000)	  	 	4,101.7	  	 	3,606.3	
Average price realized per ounce	  	$	352	  	$	304	
Average spot price per ounce	  	$	349	  	$	301	
 
70

Increase in consolidated gold sales due to:
 
 	  	Six Months Ended
June 30,
	
 	  	2003 vs. 2002
(in millions)
	
Consolidated production	  	$	152.5	
Average gold price received	  	 	194.3	
 	  			
 	  	$	346.8	

Sales—base metals, net totaled $12.7 million from the Golden Grove operation in Western Australia in the second quarter of 2003, compared to $22.9 million in the second quarter of 2002 and included $9.5 million from copper sales and $3.2 million from zinc sales, both net of smelting and refining charges, compared to $4.4 million from copper sales and $14.9 million from zinc sales, both net of smelting and refining charges, and $3.6 million from cobalt sales (from the Kasese operation) during quarter ended June 30, 2002. Sales—base metals, net totaled $32.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared to $32.3 million for the same period of 2002, and included $23.8 million from copper sales and $8.4 million from zinc sales, both net smelting and refining charges, compared to $13.8 million from copper sales and $14.9 million from zinc sales, both net of smelting and refining charges, and $3.6 million from cobalt sales (from the Kasese operation) during quarter ended June 30, 2002. The Kasese operation was sold during the second quarter of June 30, 2002.
 
Royalties of $10.5 million and $11.2 million were earned during the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $24.9 million and $15.0 million were earned during the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The year-to-date increase in 2003 relates primarily to six months of activity in 2003 compared to a four and one-half months in 2002, as most of the royalties were acquired as part of the acquisition of Franco-Nevada, and the higher prevailing gold and oil and gas prices for the six months ended June 30, 2003, as well as increased production from the Goldstrike property and a settlement of a royalty dispute. Newmont expects to earn $40 million to $50 million in royalties for the full year 2003.
 
Costs applicable to sales—gold were $423.7 million and $383.5 million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $822.7 million and $712.1 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The quarter-to-date and year-to-date 2003 increase is primarily attributable to increased consolidated gold ounces sold and an increase in consolidated total cash costs per ounce. The increase in ounces sold was primarily at Yanacocha and in Australia, offset by a slight decline in ounces sold in Nevada. Cash costs primarily increased at Nevada and Australia, offset by a decrease in cash costs in Yanacocha. See Results of Operations for a discussion of gold sales and total cash costs per ounce by operation for 2003 and 2002
 
Costs applicable to sales—base metals and other was $10.0 million and $8.7 million in the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $25.3 million and $19.4 million in the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The second quarter of 2003 included $2.4 million for copper, $7.3 million for zinc and $0.3 million for other, while the second quarter of 2002 included $4.9 million for copper and $3.8 million for cobalt. Costs for Zinc production were offset by lead by-product credits. The increase for the three months ended June 30, 2003 relates primarily to increased production of copper and zinc at Golden Grove compared to the three months ended June 30, 2002, offset by the disposal of the Kasese cobalt operation during the second quarter of 2002. The first half of 2003 included $11.4 million for copper, $13.3 million for zinc and $0.6 for other, while the first half of 2002 included $13.5 million for copper and $5.9 million for cobalt and other. The increase for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same period of 2002 was attributable to the full six months of operations at Golden Grove, compared to four and one-half months of operations at Golden Grove in 2002, offset by the disposal of the Kasese operation during the second quarter of 2002.
 
Deferred Stripping
 
In general, mining costs are charged to Costs applicable to sales as incurred. However, at open-pit mines, which have diverse grades and waste-to-ore ratios over the mine life, the Company defers and amortizes certain
 
71

mining costs on a units-of-production basis over the life of the mine. These mining costs, which are commonly referred to as “deferred stripping” costs, are incurred in mining activities that are normally associated with the removal of waste rock. The deferred stripping accounting method is generally accepted in the mining industry where mining operations have diverse grades and waste-to-ore ratios; however industry practice does vary. Deferred stripping matches the costs of production with the sale of such production at the Company’s operations where it is employed, by assigning each ounce of gold or ton of ore with an equivalent amount of waste removal cost. If the Company were to expense stripping costs as incurred, there may be greater volatility in the Company’s period-to-period results of operations.
 
Details of deferred stripping with respect to certain of the Company’s open pit mines are as follows (unaudited):
 
 	  	Three Months Ended June 30,
	  	Six Months Ended June 30,
	
 	  	Nevada(3)
	  	La Herradura(4)
	  	Nevada(3)
	  	La Herradura(4)
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	
Life-of-mine Assumptions Used as Basis For Deferred Stripping Calculations	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	
– Stripping ratio(1)	  	125.0	  	125.5	  	146.4	  	141.3	  	125.0	  	128.1	  	146.4	  	141.3	
– Average ore grade (ounces of gold per ton)	  	0.049	  	0.073	  	0.030	  	0.031	  	0.049	  	0.073	  	0.030	  	0.031	
Actuals for Year	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	
– Stripping ratio(2)	  	121.3	  	81.3	  	161.1	  	167.1	  	108.9	  	82.3	  	159.3	  	166.5	
– Average ore grade (ounces of gold per ton)	  	0.081	  	0.072	  	0.026	  	0.026	  	0.093	  	0.067	  	0.026	  	0.026	
Remaining Mine Life (years)	  	8	  	9	  	5	  	6	  	8	  	9	  	5	  	6	
					
 	  	Tanami(5,7)
	  	Kalgoorlie(5)
	  	Tanami(5,7)
	  	Kalgoorlie(5)
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	
Life-of-mine Assumptions Used as Basis For Deferred Stripping Calculations	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	
– Stripping ratio(1)	  	54.9	  	69.8	  	104.1	  	104.1	  	54.9	  	69.8	  	104.1	  	104.1	
– Average ore grade (ounces of gold per ton)	  	0.120	  	0.120	  	0.065	  	0.065	  	0.120	  	0.120	  	0.065	  	0.065	
Actuals for Year	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	
– Stripping ratio(2)	  	81.5	  	82.5	  	89.4	  	98.0	  	80.9	  	78.8	  	90.4	  	98.0	
– Average ore grade (ounces of gold per ton)	  	0.100	  	0.110	  	0.069	  	0.054	  	0.110	  	0.110	  	0.064	  	0.054	
Remaining Mine Life (years)	  	3	  	4	  	13	  	14	  	3	  	4	  	13	  	14	
					
 	  	Martha(6,8)
	  	Ovacik(6)
	  	Martha(6,8)
	  	Ovacik(6)
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	
Life-of-mine Assumptions Used as Basis For Deferred Stripping Calculations	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	
– Stripping ratio(1)	  	29.1	  	28.8	  	26.3	  	26.3	  	29.1	  	28.8	  	26.3	  	26.3	
– Average ore grade (ounces of gold per ton)	  	0.093	  	0.093	  	0.356	  	0.362	  	0.093	  	0.093	  	0.356	  	0.362	
Actuals for Year	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	
– Stripping ratio(2)	  	63.6	  	21.6	  	23.2	  	26.0	  	36.9	  	21.6	  	21.5	  	25.8	
– Average ore grade (ounces of gold per ton)	  	0.073	  	0.098	  	0.346	  	0.376	  	0.083	  	0.098	  	0.361	  	0.371	
Remaining Mine Life (years)	  	4	  	5	  	2	  	3	  	4	  	5	  	2	  	3	

(1)	 	Total tons to be mined in future divided by total ounces of gold to be recovered in future, based on proven and probable reserves.	
(2)	 	Total tons mined divided by total ounces of gold recovered.	
(3)	 	The life-of-mine stripping ratio decreased slightly during 2003 from 2002 due to changes in the mining plan. The actual stripping ratio increased in 2003 from 2002 due to changes in the mining sequence to access higher-grade ore, which had a higher stripping ratio.	
(4)	 	The life-of-mine stripping ratio increased slightly in 2003 from 2002 as a result of a slight decrease in ore grade. The actual stripping ratio decreased in 2003 due to more ore than waste being mined as the pit deepens. La Herradura is included in the Company’s Other North America operating segment.	
(5)	 	Tanami and Kalgoorlie are included in the Company’s Other Australia operating segment.	
(6)	 	Martha and Ovacik are included in the Company’s Other International operating segment.	
(7)	 	The life-of mine strip ratio decreased during 2003 from 2002 due to a revised mine plan.	
(8)	 	The actual strip ratio increased in 2003 due to high waste removal during the period.	
 
72

Depreciation, depletion and amortization was $139.3 million and $123.6 million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively and $269.9 million and $225.8 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The 13% increase in second quarter of 2003 relates primarily to the implementation of FAS 143 (see Accounting Changes) that resulted in an increase to Property, plant and equipment for the asset retirement costs which are depreciated over the life of each operation. The 20% increase in the first half of 2003 is attributable to a full six months of activity in 2003 from the acquired Normandy operations compared to four and one-half months in 2002, increased production and an increase in the depreciable base due to the adoption of SFAS 143 (see Accounting Changes). Newmont expects Depreciation, depletion and amortization to total between $560 million and $590 million for the full year 2003.
 
The following is a summary of Costs applicable to sales and Depreciation, depletion and amortization by operation:
 
 	  	CostsApplicable of Sales
	  	Depreciation, Depletion and
Amortization
	
 	  	Three Months
Ended June 30,
	 	 	Six Months
Ended June 30,
	  	Three Months
Ended June 30,
	  	Six Months
Ended June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	 	 	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	  	2003
	  	2002
	
 	  	(Unaudited and in millions)	
North America:	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Nevada	  	$	138.3	  	$	155.1	 	 	$	283.8	  	$	309.5	  	$	34.7	  	$	25.2	  	$	66.3	  	$	52.0	
Mesquite, California	  	 	2.4	  	 	2.1	 	 	 	5.0	  	 	4.5	  	 	1.6	  	 	1.5	  	 	2.5	  	 	3.0	
La Herradura, Mexico	  	 	3.5	  	 	2.8	 	 	 	5.7	  	 	5.7	  	 	0.9	  	 	0.7	  	 	1.7	  	 	1.5	
Golden Giant, Canada	  	 	13.7	  	 	13.6	 	 	 	30.4	  	 	27.3	  	 	4.4	  	 	5.6	  	 	11.6	  	 	10.1	
Holloway, Canada	  	 	4.7	  	 	5.1	 	 	 	10.1	  	 	10.7	  	 	1.1	  	 	1.3	  	 	2.4	  	 	3.1	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Total North America	  	 	162.6	  	 	178.7	 	 	 	335.0	  	 	357.7	  	 	42.7	  	 	34.3	  	 	84.5	  	 	69.7	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
South America:	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Yanacocha, Peru	  	 	83.5	  	 	69.5	 	 	 	169.0	  	 	138.7	  	 	40.4	  	 	26.2	  	 	75.9	  	 	61.2	
Kori Kollo, Bolivia	  	 	11.2	  	 	11.3	 	 	 	21.8	  	 	22.8	  	 	1.8	  	 	3.8	  	 	3.9	  	 	6.9	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Total South America	  	 	94.7	  	 	80.8	 	 	 	190.8	  	 	161.5	  	 	42.2	  	 	30.0	  	 	79.8	  	 	68.1	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Australia:	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Kalgoorlie	  	 	29.7	  	 	19.6	 	 	 	52.1	  	 	30.4	  	 	3.0	  	 	2.2	  	 	4.6	  	 	3.4	
Yandal	  	 	45.4	  	 	38.7	 	 	 	85.1	  	 	55.9	  	 	7.4	  	 	9.6	  	 	18.0	  	 	15.8	
Tanami	  	 	46.7	  	 	32.3	 	 	 	78.3	  	 	45.1	  	 	10.1	  	 	9.9	  	 	17.7	  	 	13.0	
Pajingo	  	 	12.2	  	 	7.6	 	 	 	20.6	  	 	12.8	  	 	6.9	  	 	6.4	  	 	12.5	  	 	9.9	
Other Australia	  	 	––	  	 	––	 	 	 	––	  	 	––	  	 	—	  	 	1.6	  	 	—	  	 	3.1	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Total Australia	  	 	134.0	  	 	98.2	 	 	 	236.1	  	 	144.2	  	 	27.4	  	 	29.7	  	 	52.8	  	 	45.2	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Other Operations:	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Minahasa, Indonesia	  	 	7.7	  	 	9.0	 	 	 	17.1	  	 	17.3	  	 	1.7	  	 	3.3	  	 	3.4	  	 	6.2	
Zarafshan-Newmont, Uzbekistan	  	 	9.4	  	 	9.9	 	 	 	18.0	  	 	17.4	  	 	2.9	  	 	3.1	  	 	5.5	  	 	5.4	
Martha, New Zealand	  	 	7.8	  	 	3.9	 	 	 	13.9	  	 	6.8	  	 	2.6	  	 	4.5	  	 	4.7	  	 	6.3	
Ovacik, Turkey	  	 	6.4	  	 	4.2	 	 	 	10.8	  	 	7.2	  	 	3.8	  	 	2.8	  	 	7.2	  	 	3.5	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Total Other Operations	  	 	31.3	  	 	27.0	 	 	 	59.8	  	 	48.7	  	 	11.0	  	 	13.7	  	 	20.8	  	 	21.4	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Other:	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Merchant banking	  	 	0.2	  	 	0.1	 	 	 	0.4	  	 	0.2	  	 	5.6	  	 	6.0	  	 	10.3	  	 	8.2	
Base metals operations	  	 	9.7	  	 	8.6	 	 	 	24.9	  	 	19.2	  	 	6.7	  	 	6.7	  	 	13.8	  	 	7.0	
Corporate and other	  	 	1.1	  	 	(1.3	)	 	 	1.0	  	 	(0.1	  	 	3.7	  	 	3.2	  	 	7.9	  	 	6.2	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Total Other	  	 	11.0	  	 	7.4	 	 	 	26.3	  	 	19.3	  	 	16.0	  	 	15.9	  	 	32.0	  	 	21.4	
 	  			  				 			  			  			  			  			  			
Total Newmont	  	$	433.6	  	$	392.1	 	 	$	848.0	  	$	731.4	  	$	139.3	  	$	123.6	  	$	269.9	  	$	225.8	

Exploration and research was $30.2 million and $18.8 million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $51.7 million and $30.4 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. These amounts reflect a full six months of exploration activity in 2003 for the combined Newmont, Franco-Nevada and Normandy exploration programs, as compared to four and one-half months in 2002. Newmont is forecasting
 
73

exploration and research expenditures for the full year 2003 between $95 million and $100 million, compared to actual expenditures in for the full year 2002 of $88.9 million.
 
General and administrative expenses totaled $31.3 million and $27.7 million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $57.7 million and $49.0 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 was attributable to higher legal expenses, increased expenses due to changes in actuarial pension assumptions, severance costs, and increased compliance and corporate governance costs. General and administrative expense has increased to 4.4% of Sales and other income for the second quarter of 2003, compared to 3.9% in the second quarter 2002 and decreased to 3.6% for the first half of 2003, compared to 4.1% for the first half of 2002. Newmont expects General and administrative expenses to total between $100 million and $105 million for the full year 2003.
 
Write-downs of assets totaled $1.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 related to the write-down of a select number of vehicles in the mobile fleet at Yanacocha to their residual value. There were no write-downs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002.
 
Other expenses (income) were $2.5 million and $(1.8) million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $24.5 million and $(0.9) million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in the second quarter 2003 comparable to the second quarter of 2002 is due to $1.9 million of severance costs associated with the gradual winding down of operations at Kori Kollo, and $1.2 million of costs associated with implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, offset by insurance recoveries. Other expenses in the first half of 2003 included, in addition to various individually insignificant items, an $10.6 million accrual for certain environmental obligations, $1.0 million associated with the finalization of a de-watering agreement in Nevada, $3.3 million for severance at the Kori Kollo project in Bolivia, $1.2 million of costs associated with implementation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, $3.0 million for cost investment impairments and $5.4 million of other expenses.
 
Gain on investments, net was $84.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, and $47.3 million for both the three and six months periods ended June 30, 2002. There were no gains or losses on investments during the three months ended June 30, 2003. During the first quarter of 2003, Newmont recorded a gain on exchange of Echo Bay shares for Kinross shares of $84.3 million. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, Newmont recorded a gain of $47.3 million of the sale of its investment of Lihir. (see Liquidity and Capital Resources, Investing Activities , for more information).
 
Gain (loss) on gold commodity derivative instruments, net representing non-cash, mark-to-market gains and losses recognized on ineffective and partially ineffective gold derivative instruments was $16.6 million and $(9.5) million in the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $71.7 million and $(3.1) million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The gains in the second quarter of 2003 resulted predominantly from a strengthening of the Australian dollar from approximately $0.60 to $0.67 per US dollar between March 31, 2003 to June 30, 2003. The majority of the acquired Normandy gold hedge books consist of contracts to receive Australian dollars and to deliver gold. Most of the contracts appreciate in value as the Australian dollar strengthens. The US dollar gold price increased from $337 per ounce to $345 per ounce between March 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003 which offset some of the positive impact from the strengthening Australian dollar. During the second quarter of 2002, the US dollar gold price per ounce increased from $303 to $314 and the Australian dollar increased from $0.54 to $0.56 per US dollar between March 31, 2002 and June 30, 2002. The change in the US dollar gold price in 2002 had a negative impact in the fair value of the contracts, and the strengthening of the Australian dollar had a slightly smaller offsetting positive impact, resulting in the net $(9.5) million result. The gain for the first half of 2003 resulted predominantly from a strengthening of the Australian dollar from approximately $0.56 to $0.67 per US dollar between December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003. The US$            gold price increased from $343 per ounce to $345 per ounce between December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003 which had a moderately negative impact on the value of the contracts. During the first half of 2002, the US dollar gold price increased from approximately $301 per ounce to $314 per ounce and the Australian dollar appreciated from approximately $0.52 to $0.56 per US dollar from February 15, 2002 (the date of acquisition of Normandy) to June 30, 2002.
 
74

Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net was $94.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. On May 29, 2003, Newmont, through its subsidiary Yandal Bond Company Pty Ltd (“YBCL”) made an offer to acquire all of NYOL’s outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes due in April 2008 at a price of $500 per $1,000 principal amount. As of June 30, 2003, YBCL had received binding tender offers for the Senior Notes totaling $196.8 million, representing 83% of the original $237.2 million outstanding principal amount (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations).
 
Gain on extinguishment of NYOL derivatives liability, net was $76.6 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. On May 28, 2003, YBCL made an offer to acquire all of NYOL’s gold hedge contracts from the counterparties at a rate of $0.50 per $1.00 of net mark-to-market hedge liability as of May 22, 2003. Six of the total of seven counterparties to the gold hedge contracts, representing 94% of the gold ounces in the NYOL hedge book and 76% of the mark-to-market May 22, 2003 hedge liability, had assigned their hedge contracts to YBCL as of June 30, 2003 (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations).
 
Loss on extinguishment of debt was $19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. During the first quarter of 2003, Newmont repurchased $23.0 million, $52.3 million, $10.0 million, and $30.9 million face amount of its outstanding 8 3/8%, 8 5/8%, Newmont Australia Limited 7 ½%, and Newmont Australia Limited 7 5/8% debentures, respectively, for total cash consideration of $135.8 million, net of associated discounts, premiums and capitalized debt issuance costs. See Liquidity and Capital Resources, Financing Activities.
 
Dividends, interest income, foreign currency exchange and other income was $32.3 million and $14.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $64.2 million and $15.3 million for six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The three months ended June 30, 2003 include a foreign currency exchange gain of $27.2 million primarily composed of the following Canadian and Australian gains and losses: (i) $31.2 million foreign exchange gain on a Canadian dollar-denominated inter-company loan to a subsidiary whose functional currency is the Canadian dollar, reflecting a strengthening of the Canadian dollar from $0.68 to $0.74 per US dollar, (ii) a $10.4 million mark-to-market gain on ineffective foreign currency swaps, and (iii) a $11.8 million foreign currency loss on the translation of Newmont Australia Limited’s financial statements to US dollars due to the appreciation of the Australian dollar which increased during the quarter from $0.60 to $0.67 per US dollar. Also included in the 2003 first quarter were other foreign currency losses of $2.7 million, interest income of $2.8 million, a $0.2 million gain on the sale of exploration properties and income of $2.1 million for other various items. The three months ended June 30, 2002 include $5.1 million of interest income, $6.1 million of net foreign currency translation and exchange losses, a gain on the sale of exploration properties of $4.7 million and negative $1.0 million of other various items. The six months ended June 30, 2003 include a foreign currency translation gain of $51.9 million primarily composed of the following: an exchange gain of $56.1 million on the Canadian intercompany loan, an $18.2 million mark-to-market gain on ineffective foreign currency swaps, and a $17.8 million foreign currency translation loss primarily associated with the appreciation of the Australian dollar and other foreign currency losses of $4.6 million. The 2003 first half also includes a $1.5 million gain on the sale of exploration properties, interest income of $5.0 million and income of $5.8 million for various other items. The six months ended June 30, 2002 includes $7.9 million of interest income, $1.5 million of net foreign currency translation and exchange losses, a gain on the sale of exploration properties of $6.4 million and $2.4 million of income for various other items.
 
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest , was $22.7 million and $35.1 million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively and $52.6 million and $66.2 million for the first half of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Interest expense declined during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 from the comparable periods of 2002 primarily due to a decrease in outstanding debt obligations (see Liquidity and Capital Resources, Financing Activities) resulting from Newmont’s debt-reduction strategy. Newmont expects Interest, net of capitalized interest , to total $90 million to $95 million for the full year 2003.
 
Income tax expense was $89.0 million and $29.8 million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $151.6 million and $31.0 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The second quarter 2003 increase primarily reflects pre-tax income of $305.7 million, compared to pre-tax income of $100.8
 
75

million for the second quarter of 2002. The effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2003 was 29%, compared to 30% for the second quarter of 2002. The first half of 2003 increase in tax expense primarily reflects pre-tax income of $561.0 million, compared to a pre-tax income of $96.6 million for the first half of 2002. The effective tax rate for the first half of 2003 was 27%, compared to 32% for the first half of 2002. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003 differs from the United States statutory rate of 35% applicable to multinational companies primarily due to the gains on the extinguishments on the NYOL bonds and derivatives liability which were subject to tax rates of approximately 30%. Higher gold prices in 2003 also resulted in higher percentage depletion and resource allowances than in 2002. For a complete discussion of the factors that influence the Company’s effective tax rate, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition in Newmont’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
 
Minority interest in income of subsidiaries was $35.8 million and $19.3 million for the second quarters 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $73.6 million and $29.8 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in 2003 is primarily a result of increased earnings at Minera Yanacocha, where Newmont has a 51.35% interest, due to higher gold prices, increased gold sales ounces and lower production costs (see Results of Operations, South American Operations ).
 
Equity loss and impairment of Australian Magnesium Corporation was $107.8 million and $119.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, and $0.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. During the second quarter of 2003, Newmont recorded a write-down of its investment in Australian Magnesium Corporation (“AMC”) of $107.8 million. The write-down was triggered by ongoing issues related to the project financing and financial viability of the Stanwell Magnesium Project and AMC’s inability to attract a new partner to finance this project. AMC halted the development and construction of the Stanwell Project during the quarter and recorded an impairment charge for the write-down of the Project’s carrying value. Newmont’s equity and impairment charge included $72.7 million for its proportionate share of AMC’s losses for the quarter, including the impairment charge on the Stanwell Project, a $24.8 million write-down of a loan receivable due to Newmont from AMC, a $10 million charge to settle Newmont’s guarantee of a contract with Ford Motor Company, $6.6 million for a new credit facility provided by Newmont as part of AMC’s restructuring and other adjustments of approximately $1.1 million, partially offset by a $7.4 million income tax benefit. Newmont also recorded a write-down of approximately $11.0 million in the first quarter of 2003 for an other-than-temporary decline in value of the AMC investment, as well as its proportionate share of AMC’s first quarter losses of $0.7 million for a total of equity loss and impairment for the six months ended June 30, 2003 of $119.5 million (see Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Investments and Equity Income of Affiliates).
 
Equity income of affiliates was $17.7 million and $18.0 million for the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $26.3 million and $19.4 million for the first half of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The three months ended June 30, 2003 included equity income in Batu Hijau of $18.4 million, and a $0.7 equity loss in AGR Matthey Joint Venture. The six months ended June 30, 2003 included equity income in Batu Hijau of $25.8 million, and equity income in TVX Newmont Americas of $0.8 million and an equity loss in AGR Matthey Joint Venture of $0.3 million. The three and six months ended June 30, 2002 includes equity income in Batu Hijau of $13.5 million and $14.9 million, respectively. Both the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 include equity income in TVX Newmont Americas of $3.9 million, and equity income in AGR Matthey Joint Venture of $0.6 million. The three and six month June 30, 2003 increase in equity income in Batu Hijau resulted primarily from a decrease in production costs due to an increase in gold by-product credits from higher grade ore and higher gold prices (see Results of Operations, Other Mining Operations ).
 
Newmont recorded a loss for the Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of tax effective January 1, 2003 of $34.5 million reflecting the effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” that changed the method of accounting for the Company’s estimated mine reclamation and abandonment costs. Newmont also recorded a gain for the Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle of $7.7 million effective January 1, 2002 with respect to depreciation, depletion and amortization of
 
76

Property, plant and mine development, net to exclude future estimated development costs expected to be incurred for certain underground operations. See Accounting Changes for more information.
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax was $19.1 million and $29.8 million during the second quarters of 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $60.2 million and $57.7 million during the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The second quarter of 2003 includes a $3.3 million loss primarily associated with the mark-to-market of Kinross Gold Corporation and other shares classified as available-for-sale marketable securities, a $26.1 million gain on the translation of subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies, a $3.7 million loss on the effective portion of changes in the fair value of gold commodity derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges. Newmont will continue to monitor the market value of its investment in Kinross Gold Corporation. In the event that the decline in the market value of the Kinross shares is sustained in future periods, the Company will evaluate the need to recognize a loss for an other-than-temporary decline in the value of the investment. The second quarter of 2002 includes a $29.0 million loss associated with the sale of the Lihir Gold shares classified as available-for-sale marketable securities, a $17.3 million gain on the translation of subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies and a $39.1 million gain on the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges. During the second quarter of 2002, the US$ gold price per ounce increased from $303 to $314 and the Australian dollar increased from $0.54 to $0.56 per US dollar between March 31, 2002 and June 30, 2002. The result of these changes was a gain on gold derivative instruments during the quarter.
 
The first half of 2003 includes $49.1 million loss on the mark-to-market of the Kinross and other shares classified as available-for-sale marketable securities, a $32.1 million gain on the translation of subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies, a $72.5 million gain on the on the effective portion of changes in the fair value of gold commodity derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges and a $4.6 million credit associated with the exchange of Echo Bay shares for Kinross shares. The gain on gold derivatives in 2003 resulted predominantly from a strengthening of the Australian dollar from approximately $0.56 to $0.67 per US dollar between December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003. The majority of the acquired Normandy gold hedge books consist of contracts to receive Australian dollars and to deliver gold. Most of the contracts appreciate in value as the Australian dollar strengthens. The US dollar gold price increased from $343 per ounce to $345 per ounce between December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003 which had a moderately negative impact on the value of the contracts. The first half of 2002 includes an $18.3 million debit associated with the sale of the Lihir Gold shares classified as available-for sale marketable securities, a $2.7 million gain on the mark-to-market of other marketable securities, an $18.1 million gain on the translation of subsidiaries with non-US dollar functional currencies and a $55.1 million gain on the effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedges. During the first half of 2002, the US dollar gold price increased from approximately $301 to $314 and the Australian dollar appreciated from approximately $0.52 to $0.56 from February 15, 2002 (the date of acquisition of Normandy) to June 30, 2002.
 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which addressed financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities. It nullified Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred rather than at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan as was required under EITF No. 94-3. SFAS 146 also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002, and we do not anticipate any impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations upon adoption except with respect to those exit or disposal activities that are initiated by the Company after that date.
 
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure,” to provide alternative methods for voluntary transition to the fair value based method
 
77

of accounting for stock based compensation. SFAS 148 also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income of an entity’s accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation. Finally, this Statement amends APB Opinion No. 28, Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information (see Note 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements). SFAS 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002.
 
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an Interpretation of FASB Statements 5, 57, 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34.” FIN 45 requires recognition and measurement of guarantees entered into or modified beginning on January 1, 2003 and requires expanded disclosure of guarantees as of December 31, 2002. The Company has conformed its disclosures with respect to guarantees to the requirements of FIN 45.
 
In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” which provides guidance on the identification of, and financial reporting for, entities over which control is achieved through means other than voting rights. FIN 46 impacts accounting for variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003, and requires expanded disclosure of variable interest entities for financial statements issued after January 31, 2003. The provisions of FIN 46 must be applied by the Company to variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 no later than the interim period beginning July 1, 2003. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adoption of FIN 46 on its financial position or results of operations.
 
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149 “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” to provide amend and clarify financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The changes in this statement improve financial reporting by requiring that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly to achieve more consistent reporting of contracts as either derivative or hybrid instruments. SFAS 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and will be applied prospectively.
 
The Emerging Issues Task Force is in the process of forming a committee to evaluate certain mining industry accounting issues, including issues arising from the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS No. 142”) to business combinations within the mining industry and accounting for goodwill and other intangibles. Although such committee has not yet been formed, and no formal agenda has been set, the issues related to the business combinations within the mining industry and accounting for goodwill and other intangibles may be addressed along with the related question of whether mineral interests conveyed by leases represent tangible or intangible assets and the amortization of such assets. While the Company believes that its accounting for its mineral interests conveyed by leases is in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company cannot predict whether the deliberations of this committee will ultimately modify or otherwise result in new accounting standards or interpretations thereof that differ from the Company’s current practices.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2003, Net cash provided by operating activities was $224.9 million, compared to $198.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002. The increase in operating cash flows in 2003 primarily reflects the impact of an increased average realized gold price in 2003 of $352 per ounce compared to $304 per ounce in 2002, offset by higher total cash costs and cash payments to settle derivative instruments. In 2003, there were several significant non-cash gains which have been included as non-cash adjustments to net income, including the gains on the extinguishments of the NYOL bonds and derivative liabilities totaling $171.0 million, the gain on exchange of Echo Bay shares for marketable securities of Kinross of $84.3 million, a gain on the mark-to-market of ineffective and partially effective derivative instruments of $71.7 million and a $34.5 million cumulative effect reflecting the adoption of SFAS No. 143. In 2002, net income was adjusted for a gain
 
78

of $47.3 million on the disposition of the Lihir securities in addition to a $7.7 million non-cash gain for the cumulative effect with respect to depreciation, depletion and amortization. Net cash provided by operating activities in the first six months of 2003 was also net of $121.0 million of cash outflows to early settle derivatives classified as cash flow hedges.
 
Net cash (used) provided by investing activities was $(119.2) million and $308.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Investing activities in 2003 used more cash primarily due to $74.5 million higher capital expenditures for property, plant and mine development and $405.0 million lower proceeds from the sale of short-term investments compared to the same period for 2002. See Investing Activities below for more information on capital expenditures in each year. The six months ended June 30, 2003 included $180.0 million of proceeds from the sale of TVX Newmont Americas, offset by a $56.2 million equity contribution to Australian Magnesium Corporation, an equity investment of the Company, net of approximately $10.0 million of cash payments received from Batu Hijau for inter-company charges. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2003, $29.1 million was used for early settlement of ineffective derivative instruments and $11.2 million was used to acquire Newmont NFM minority interest. The six months ended June 30, 2002 also included proceeds of $84.0 million from the sale of Lihir securities, proceeds of $50.8 million from the sale of cross currency swaps, proceeds of $19.9 million from other, and a net $87.9 million outflow related to the acquisitions of Franco-Nevada and Normandy.
 
Net cash used in financing activities was $214.8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2003, compared to $386.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2002. Financing activities in 2003 included $322.4 million of debt repayments, including early extinguishments (see Financing Activities), offset by $115.0 million of borrowings under the Company’s credit facilities of which $19.0 million was outstanding at June 30, 2003, and $32.3 million of cash outflows for dividend payments. The Company also received approximately $24.8 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock. The six months ended June 30, 2002 included $489.1 million of borrowings on the Company’s credit facilities to pay the cash portion of the purchase price of Normandy and other acquisition costs. Such borrowings were repaid shortly after the acquisition with the proceeds from the sale of the Franco-Nevada short-term investments. Total debt payments were $119.8 million. Dividend payments for 2002 totaled $25.9 million, and the Company received approximately $62.9 million of proceeds from the issuance of common stock primarily from the exercise of employee stock options.
 
Newmont’s contractual obligations at June 30, 2003 are summarized as follows:
 
 	  	Payments Due by Period
	
Contractual Obligations (1) (2)
	  	Total
	  	Less than 1
Year
	  	1-3
Years
	  	3-5
Years
	  	More
than 5
Years
	
 	  	(in millions)	
Long-term debt	  	$	1,149.3	  	$	20.7	  	$	631.1	  	$	260.0	  	$	237.5	
Capital lease obligations	  	 	304.3	  	 	2.7	  	 	38.3	  	 	57.9	  	 	205.4	
Operating leases	  	 	57.1	  	 	10.9	  	 	30.4	  	 	11.1	  	 	4.7	
Minimum royalty payments	  	 	68.5	  	 	21.3	  	 	29.1	  	 	17.7	  	 	0.4	
Purchase obligations	  	 	69.0	  	 	20.6	  	 	22.1	  	 	11.8	  	 	14.5	
Other	  	 	200.6	  	 	50.8	  	 	96.9	  	 	52.8	  	 	0.1	
 	  			  			  			  			  			
Total	  	$	1,848.8	  	$	127.0	  	$	847.9	  	$	411.3	  	$	462.6	

(1)	 	Purchase obligations represent contractual obligations for purchase of power, supplies, consumables, inventories, royalties and capital projects.	
(2)	 	Mining operations are subject to extensive environmental regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate. Pursuant to environmental regulations, we are required to close our operations and reclaim and remediate the lands that operations have disturbed. The cost of these remediation and reclamation obligations are not included in the table above. For more information regarding remediation and reclamation liabilities see Note 10 to the March 31, 2003 Consolidated Financial Statements.	
 
79

For information on the Company’s long-term debt, capital lease obligations and operating leases, see Notes 11 and 26 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Newmont’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Newmont believes it will be able to fund all existing obligations from Net cash provided by operating activities. Subject to any significant adverse changes in the Company’s long-term view of gold prices, the Company has both the ability and intent to fund, from net cash provided by operating activities, the exploration expenditures and Merchant Banking investments that were assumed in the valuations performed to allocate goodwill to the Exploration and Merchant Banking segments as part of the purchase accounting for the acquisitions of Normandy and Franco-Nevada and to perform impairment testing of such goodwill at December 31, 2002. The Company believes it will be able to raise capital as needed in capital markets in the future as opportunities for expansion arise.
 
Newmont’s cash flows can be impacted by its gold derivative contracts. For gold ounces sold into gold forward sales contracts and other similar instruments (“committed contracts”), the Company realizes the contract price fixed in each contract. If the spot price at the time of the sale exceeds the related contract price, Newmont does not receive the excess of the spot price over the strike price relative to the ounces sold into that contract. If the spot price at the time of the sale is below the contract price, Newmont realizes an above-market price on the ounces sold into that contract based on the contract price. Gold put option contracts and other similar instruments (“uncommitted contracts”) have the effect of establishing a floorprice the Company will receive for gold ounces sold into each contract. If the spot price at the time of the sale exceeds the strike price of the contract, then Newmont realizes the spot price. If the spot price at the time of the sale is less than the strike price, then Newmont realizes the strike price. Assuming the contracts remain outstanding in the future, committed contracts have the effect of locking in the price Newmont will realize on the sale of the ounces associated with each contract, and uncommitted contracts have the effect of establishing a minimum price Newmont will realize for the sale of the ounces associated with each contract.
 
Based on current gold prices and exchange rates, Newmont estimates that there will be no impact of its gold derivative contracts outstanding at June 30, 2003 on the net cash proceeds from the sale of gold in 2003 compared to the proceeds the Company would have received if the relevant gold had been sold into the spot market. 3% of estimated production in 2003 is subject to uncommitted contracts and there are no committed contracts remaining for 2003. The reduction of proceeds from the sale of gold in each of the years 2004 through 2008, when all currently outstanding gold derivative contracts will have matured, is not expected to exceed $0.7 million based on an assumed gold price of $340 per ounce, a price that is consistent with management’s long-term view of gold prices. In addition, no assurance can be given that the gold derivative contracts will remain outstanding in the future as Newmont may opportunistically close out certain contracts if favorable market conditions exist. At June 30, 2003, Newmont also was contractually obligated to pay approximately $12 million in 2003 related to the ineffective portion of certain gold derivative contracts. Payments for these items in the years 2004 and thereafter are not expected to exceed the amount in 2003.
 
The Company’s cash flows could also be impacted by certain gold derivative contracts that are subject to rights to terminate (see Market Conditions and Risks).
 
80

Investing Activities
 
Additions to Property, plant and mine development
 
 	  	Six months
ended June 30,
	
 	  	2003
	  	2002
	
 	  	(unaudited, in millions)	
North America:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Nevada	  	$	50.0	  	$	21.2	
La Herradura, Mexico	  	 	1.1	  	 	1.1	
Golden Giant, Canada	  	 	0.2	  	 	4.6	
Holloway, Canada	  	 	0.9	  	 	0.7	
 	  			  			
Total North America	  	 	52.2	  	 	27.6	
 	  			  			
South America:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Yanacocha, Peru	  	 	96.0	  	 	69.7	
Kori Kollo, Bolivia	  	 	0.6	  	 	0.6	
 	  			  			
Total South America	  	 	96.6	  	 	70.3	
 	  			  			
Australia:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Pajingo	  	 	6.4	  	 	3.4	
Kalgoorlie	  	 	2.6	  	 	5.4	
Yandal	  	 	8.8	  	 	10.8	
Tanami	  	 	12.8	  	 	8.1	
 	  			  			
Total Australia	  	 	30.6	  	 	27.7	
 	  			  			
Other Operations:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Zarafshan-Newmont, Uzbekistan	  	 	0.7	  	 	2.7	
Martha, New Zealand	  	 	9.5	  	 	3.9	
Akyem, Ghang	  	 	2.6	  	 	—	
Ahafo (Yamfo-Sefai), Ghang	  	 	6.4	  	 	—	
Ovacik, Turkey	  	 	2.9	  	 	2.0	
 	  			  			
Total Other Operations	  	 	22.1	  	 	8.6	
 	  			  			
Other:	  	 	 	  	 	 	
Base Metals Operations	  	 	5.8	  	 	3.8	
Corporate and Other	  	 	8.0	  	 	2.8	
 	  			  			
Total Other	  	 	13.8	  	 	6.6	
 	  			  			
Total Newmont	  	$	215.3	  	$	140.8	

Expenditures for North American operations during the first six months of 2003 ($52.2 million) included $26.5 million related to activities in Nevada for the development of the Leeville Underground Mine (“Leeville”). South American capital expenditures were primarily at Yanacocha ($96.0 million) with $66.4 million for mine and leach pads development and other ongoing expansion work. Australian capital expenditures of $30.6 million were primarily for mine development at the majority of the underground mines. Other projects include mine development at the Martha mine in New Zealand. Expenditures for North American operations during the first six months of 2002 included $21.2 million related to activities in Nevada, which included expenditures for the development of the Deep Post, Leeville and Chukar underground mines and other new project development. South American capital expenditures were primarily at Yanacocha ($69.7 million) for mine development and other ongoing expansion work.
 
Newmont expects to spend approximately $550 million to $580 million on capital projects in 2003, with approximately $137 million in North America, $137 million in Australia, $226 million in South America and
 
81

approximately $71 million in other locations. The majority of budgeted expenditures are for mine development and replacement capital. In Nevada, two expansion projects, the Gold Quarry South Layback (“GQSL”) and the Leeville, are underway. GQSL is located in the South Area at Carlin and is expected to yield approximately 2.7 million ounces of production, with annual production of between 420,000 and 440,000 ounces commencing in late 2003. Total capital expenditures for GQSL are projected to be approximately $9.1 million, of which $2.1 million had been spent as of June 30, 2003. Leeville is located in Carlin’s North Area and will produce approximately 3.0 million ounces, with annual production of approximately 500,000 to 550,000 ounces commencing at the end of 2005. Total capital expenditures for Leeville are projected to be $181 million, of which $42.6 million had been spent as of June 30, 2003.
 
Other Investing Activities
 
TVX Newmont Americas
 
On January 31, 2003, Newmont sold its 49.9% interest in TVX Newmont Americas (a joint venture between the Company and TVX Gold Inc, acquired as part of the Normandy transaction) to TVX for $180 million in cash. Newmont recognized no material gain or loss on the transaction.
 
Echo Bay Mines Ltd.
 
On January 31, 2003, Kinross Gold Corporation, Echo Bay Mines Ltd. and TVX Gold Inc. were combined. Under the terms of the combination and acquisition, Newmont received a 13.8% interest in the restructured Kinross in exchange for its 45.67% interest in Echo Bay. Newmont recognized a pre-tax gain of $84.3 million on the transaction.
 
Batu Hijau
 
As discussed in Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Newmont has an indirect 45% interest in the Batu Hijau mine in Indonesia and its partner, an affiliate of Sumitomo Corporation, has an indirect 35% interest. Because Newmont and Sumitomo carried the interest of the 20% Indonesian partner, Newmont recognizes 56.25% of Batu Hijau’s income until recouping the bulk of its investment. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, Newmont’s investment in Batu Hijau was $684.9 million and $660.9 million, respectively.
 
On May 9, 2002, P.T.Newmont Nusa Tenggara (“PTNNT”) completed a restructuring of its $1.0 billion project financing facility (Senior Debt) that provides PTNNT the ability to defer up to $173.4 million in principal payments scheduled for 2002 and 2003. The restructuring was expected to provide a better match between the expected cash flows of the project and the maturities of the debt. Any deferred principal amounts were to be repaid between 2004 and 2010. Under this restructuring, PTNNT is not permitted to pay dividends or make other restricted payments to Newmont or Sumitomo as long as any amount of deferred principal is outstanding; however, there is no restriction on prepaying any of the deferred principal amounts. Amounts outstanding under the project financing were $783.2 million at June 30, 2003 and $913.3 million in December 31, 2002. The amount of deferred principal at June 30, 2003 was $43.3 million and at December 31, 2002 was $173.4 million. During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, PTNNT repaid $130.1 million of this facility all of which represented repayments of the deferred principal. Newmont and its partner also provide a contingent support facility to PTNNT. During the first half of 2003 and 2002, Newmont funded zero and $24.8 million, respectively, under this contingent support facility as its pro-rata share of capital expenditures. Remaining support from Newmont and its partner available under this facility amounts to $115.0 million, of which Newmont’s pro-rata share is $64.7 million.
 
Australian Magnesium Corporation
 
At December 31, 2002, Newmont’s interest in AMC comprised a 22.8% equity and voting interest and a loan receivable in the amount of A$38 million (approximately $20.1 million) including interest capitalized since December 31, 2002. In addition, Newmont subsidiaries had obligations to contribute to AMC A$100 million in
 
82

equity by January 31, 2003 and a further A$90 million in equity (reduced to A$75 million through a funding agreement reached in January 2003, though a condition required to bring the agreement into effect was not satisfied), contingent upon the Stanwell Magnesium Project not achieving certain specified production and operating criteria by December 2006. On January 3, 2003, Newmont purchased an additional 167 million shares at A$0.60 per share for a total of A$100 million (approximately $56.2 million) increasing its ownership to 40.9%, thereby satisfying its January 2003 equity contribution obligation. However, due to additional equity contributions by other shareholders on January 31, 2003, Newmont’s interest was decreased to 27.8%. As a result of this equity dilution in its interest in AMC, Newmont recorded an increase of $7.0 million to Additional paid-in-capital .
 
AMC’s primary asset is the Stanwell Magnesium Project (the “Project”), a proprietary chemical and dehydration process for producing anhydrous magnesium chloride as feed for an electrolytic cell to produce molten magnesium metal and magnesium alloys. The original funding arrangements for the Project amounted to approximately A$1.5 billion (approximately $1 billion), including contingencies and cost overrun reserves. Preliminary indications by AMC are that the project may now require A$150 million to A$200 million (approximately $100 million to $134 million) of funds in addition to the existing funding arrangements and potentially some form of third-party project financing support.
 
On April 17, 2003, AMC announced that it was unlikely that it would reach agreement with its independent engineering firm for a fixed price contract for the development of the Project. Following this announcement, AMC’s share price declined substantially and was A$0.24 per share on May 8, 2003. As a result, Newmont wrote down the carrying value of its investment at March 31, 2003 to the quoted market price of the AMC shares at that date of $A0.43 per share and recorded a loss for an other-than-temporary decline in market value of $11 million.
 
On June 5, 2003, AMC requested suspension of its securities on the ASX. Subsequently, on June 12, 2003 AMC announced a restructuring agreement with the project’s major creditors including Newmont (the “Agreement”). The Agreement was designed to give AMC time to assess the Project development options and to search for either a corporate or project partner. Work on the Project has essentially ceased and the site is in a care and maintenance status. It is not known if or when the Project or any other magnesium project will be developed by AMC. In addition, as part of the Agreement, AMC (i) will settle outstanding obligations to its outside creditors from existing cash reserves, (ii) has cancelled the senior debt facilities associated with the Project and the associated foreign exchange and interest rate hedging contracts and (iii) has agreed to release Newmont from the above-mentioned A$90 million (approximately $60.1 million) contingent funding commitment. Newmont has agreed to forgive its A$38 million (approximately $24.8 million) loan receivable and provide support in the form of an A$10 million (approximately $6.6 million) contingent, subordinated credit facility and to maintain the existing guarantee in relation to the QMC finance facilities described below.
 
As a result of the agreement, Newmont recorded an additional write-down in the second quarter of $107.8 million reducing the carrying value of its investment in AMC to zero. The write-down is attributable to the following: (i) $72.7 million representing the book value of the investment at June 30, 2003, (ii) $24.8 million for the loan receivable from AMC, (iii) $10 million charge to settle Newmont’s guarantee of the Ford contract (see discussion below), (iv) $6.6 million relating to the contingent credit facility, and (v) $1.1 million for various other items offset by a $7.4 million income tax benefit.
 
Newmont had guaranteed a $30 million obligation payable by AMC to Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) in the event the Project did not meet certain specified production and operating criteria by November 2005. AMC indemnified Newmont for this obligation, but this indemnity was unsecured. As of June 30, 2003, Newmont and Ford agreed to settle the liability in relation to the guarantee for $10 million in exchange for a release of the guarantee. Newmont has agreed not to seek recovery of this amount from AMC.
 
Subsequent to June 30, 2003, Newmont’s ownership interest in AMC was further diluted to 26.9% (See Note 21, Subsequent Events).
 
83

Newmont is also the guarantor of an A$71 million (approximately $47 million) amortizing loan facility of AMC’s subsidiary, QMC Finance Pty Ltd (“QMC”), of which A$67.5 million (approximately $45.0 million) was outstanding as of June 30, 2003. The QMC loan facility, which is secured by the assets of the Queensland Magnesia Project, expires in November 2006.
 
QMC is also a party to hedging contracts, which have been guaranteed by Newmont. The contracts include a series of foreign exchange forward contracts and bought put options, the last of which expire in June 2006. As of June 30, 2003, the fair value of these contracts was a positive A$5.5 million (approximately $3.7 million).
 
The guarantees under the QMC loan facility and hedging contracts could be called in the event of a default by QMC. Newmont’s liability under QMC loan facility guarantee is limited to the total amount of outstanding borrowings under the facility at the time the guarantee is called. Newmont’s maximum potential liability under its guarantee of the QMC hedging contracts, however, would depend on the market value of the hedging contracts at the time the guarantee is called upon. The principal lender and counterparty under the QMC loan and hedging facilities also have a fixed and floating charge over certain assets of AMC. In the event the guarantees are called, Newmont would have a right of subrogation to the lender under Australian law.
 
Takeover Bid for Otter Gold Mines Limited
 
On December 4, 2002, Normandy NFM Limited, trading as Newmont NFM (“Newmont NFM”) announced its intention to make an offer for all shares and options in Otter Gold Mines Limited (“Otter”) that Newmont NFM did not already own. Newmont NFM is an Australian corporation that is listed on the Australian Stock Exchange (“ASX”). Otter is a New Zealand corporation that is also listed on the ASX. As of the date of making the announcement, the Company, through subsidiaries, held an 85.86% interest in Newmont NFM and Newmont NFM, in turn, held 89.17% of the outstanding Otter shares. Newmont NFM’s offer was made on January 9, 2003 and closed on February 25, 2003. By the close of the offer, Newmont NFM had acquired in excess of 90% of the total outstanding shares in Otter, which, under New Zealand law, entitled Newmont NFM to compulsorily acquire all remaining outstanding Otter shares. Newmont NFM has initiated and completed the compulsory acquisition process and now owns 100% of Otter. The total purchase price was approximately $1.5 million.
 
Newmont NFM Limited Scheme of Arrangement
 
On April 2, 2003, the shareholders of Newmont NFM voted to approve the proposed scheme of arrangement under which Newmont NFM would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Newmont Australia Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Newmont Mining Corporation. The Federal Court in Sydney, Australia approved the scheme on April 11, 2003 and the scheme became effective on April 14, 2003 after the orders of the Federal Court were filed with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. Under the terms of the scheme, Newmont NFM shareholders receive 4.40 ASX listed Newmont Mining Corporation CHESS Depositary Instruments (“CDIs”), with each CDI equivalent to 0.1 Newmont Mining Corporation common shares. As an alternative to receiving Newmont Mining Corporation CDIs, shareholders could sell their Newmont NFM shares back to the company under a concurrent buy-back offer of A$16.50 per Newmont NFM share. On April 29, 2003, Newmont Mining Corporation issued 4,437,506 common shares to the CHESS, and in turn, 44,375,060 CDIs were issued to former NFM shareholders. The market value of the issued Newmont Mining Corporation shares was approximately $105 million, based on the average quoted value of the shares of $23.58 two days before and after November 28, 2002, the date the terms of the transaction were agreed upon and announced. The market value of the issued shares, together with the cash consideration paid to those shareholders who elected to accept the buy-back offer of approximately $10 million (including transaction costs), gave rise to a total purchase price of approximately $115 million. Newmont has performed a preliminary purchase price allocation based on independent appraisals and valuations that gave rise to goodwill of $77.1 million. The final purchase price allocation is not expected to vary significantly from the preliminary allocation.
 
84

Ntotoroso Acquisition
 
On March 24, 2003, Newmont and Moydow Mines International Inc. signed a letter of intent for Newmont to purchase Moydow’s 50% interest in the Ntotoroso property located on the Ahafo belt in Ghana for $20 million. Newmont currently holds the other 50% interest in Ntotoroso. Under the terms of the letter of intent, Moydow will have the option to receive up to $2 million in cash and the balance in Newmont shares. Moydow will also receive a 2% net smelter return royalty on gold and silver production from the property in excess of the current reserve of 1.2 million ounces. The acquisition will give Newmont 100% ownership of the Ahafo project. Newmont expects to close the transaction during the third quarter of 2003.
 
Pension Funding
 
Due to poor returns on plan assets during the last few years, Newmont funded $6.3 million into its pension plans during the first half of 2003 and expects to fund approximately an additional $15 million to $18 million during the second half of 2003. The second quarter funding was from Net cash provided by operating activities and all subsequent funding in 2003 is expected to come from the same source. See Market Conditions and Risks, Pension and Other Benefits for more information.
 
Financing Activities
 
Scheduled minimum long-term debt repayments are $23.6 million for the remainder of 2003, $177.4 million in 2004, $437.0 million in 2005, $109.8 million in 2006, $74.8 million in 2007 and $631.0 million thereafter. Newmont expects to be able to fund maturities of its debt from cash provided by operating activities.
 
The Company’s $1.0 billion revolving credit facility, entered into June 1997, was replaced in October 2001 with two unsecured multi-currency revolving credit facilities with a consortium of banks: a $200 million facility with an initial term of 364 days, which may be extended annually to October 2006; and a $400 million revolving facility, which matures in October 2006. In February 2002, in connection with the Normandy transaction, Newmont acquired an additional A$490 million committed revolving multi-option facility with a syndicate of banks. In May 2002, Newmont repaid the $170.6 million outstanding under this facility, closed it and added an additional $150 million Australian bank tranche to the existing facilities for a total borrowing capacity of $750 million. Interest rates and facility fees vary based on the Company’s credit rating. Borrowings under the facilities bear interest equal to either the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin ranging from 0.70% to 0.975% or the greater of the federal funds rate or the lead bank’s prime rate. Annual fees vary from 0.10% to 0.40%. At June 30, 2003, the fees were 0.15%, 0.175% and 0.30% of the commitment, for the $200 million, the $400 million and the $150 million facilities, respectively. The facilities contain customary affirmative and negative covenants including financial covenants requiring the maintenance of specified limitations on debt-to-capitalization and debt-to-earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and restrictions on incurring liens and transactions with affiliates. There were $19.0 million of borrowings under the facilities as of June 30, 2003. The Company is in compliance with all debt covenants.
 
In April 1998, NYOL, an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary of Newmont, issued $300 million of ten year 8 7 / 8 % senior unsecured notes. In conjunction with the Normandy acquisition, NYOL was acquired by Newmont in February 2002. In March 2002, Newmont, through an indirect, wholly-owned subsidiary, made an offer to repurchase any and all of NYOL’s outstanding 8 7 / 8 % Senior Notes due 2008. As of the offer date, $300 million principal amount of notes was outstanding. The repurchase offer was made pursuant to the terms of an Indenture dated as of April 7, 1998, between NYOL and The Bank of New York, as Trustee. The Indenture required that NYOL, following a “Change of Control” as defined in the Indenture, make an offer to repurchase the notes at a repurchase price of 101% of the principal amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the repurchase date. Although the applicable provisions of the Indenture can be read to the contrary, Newmont took the position that a Change of Control occurred on February 20, 2002 when Newmont acquired control of Normandy. The Indenture provides that NYOL is not required to make the Change of Control Offer if a third party makes the offer. Newmont’s offer, however, should not be construed as a commitment by Newmont to provide ongoing
 
85

financial or credit support to NYOL. The Change of Control Offer was open until May 14, 2002, resulted in redemption of $62.8 million of the outstanding notes and gave rise to a $0.6 million loss on extinguishment recorded in Other expenses .
 
On May 29, 2003, Newmont made an offer through its subsidiary, YBCL to acquire all of the outstanding 87/8% Senior Notes due in April 2008 of its Australian subsidiary, NYOL. The offer to acquire the Senior Notes was at a price of $500 per $1,000 of principal amount. As of June 30, 2003, YBCL had received binding tenders for the Senior Notes totaling $196.8 million, representing 83% of the total $237.2 million outstanding principal amount. The transaction gave rise to a Gain on extinguishment of NYOL bonds, net of $94.4 million, net of transaction costs. YBCL subsequently received additional binding tenders for a portion of the remaining outstanding Senior Notes and extended the offer deadline (see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Subsequent Events). In order to comply with applicable requirements and to allow holders of NYOL’s outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes more time to assess these developments, YBCL, extended the consent payment deadline and the expiration of the offer to acquire the Senior Notes to July 11, 2003. YBCL subsequently extended the deadline to July 18, 2003. As of June 30, 2003, YBCL had received tenders for the Senior Notes totaling $196.8 million, or 83%, of the total $237.2 million principal. The NYOL notes are non-recourse to Newmont and have not been assumed or otherwise guaranteed by Newmont. Interest on the notes is paid semi-annually in arrears in April and October. Certain financial instruments were entered into whereby NYOL has agreed to exchange US dollar fixed interest amounts payable with a gold interest rate. Of the total, US$183.6 million has been swapped into a gold interest rate, of which half is fixed at 3.87% and half is floating. These transactions have been closed out as part of the buy back of the NYOL hedge book liability discussed in Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Extinguishment of NYOL Obligations.
 
On July 3, 2003, the board of directors of NYOL resolved to place the company into Voluntary Administration (“VA”) as it was insolvent or likely to become insolvent. Under Australian VA law, the powers of all NYOL officers have been suspended and control of NYOL has been transferred to an Independent Administrator. During the VA process, the role of the directors of NYOL is to assist the Independent Administrator and provide certain information. The Independent Administrator’s role is to manage the operations of NYOL during such time as the Independent Administrator investigates whether NYOL’s creditors and NYOL can work out a solution to NYOL’s financial position such that NYOL may be returned to the control of the original board of directors, reorganized or liquidated. The Independent Administrator is responsible for soliciting and accessing proposed deeds of company arrangement (“DOCA”), with the creditors’ role essentially limited to consulting with the administrator and then voting on the proposed DOCA. Under Australian VA law, the court is called upon only when disputes require adjudication during the process. VA is governed by strict timeframes, with a decision on the future of the company made at a meeting a maximum of 28 days from the commencement of the administration (with extensions allowed with court approval). As a result of NYOL’s placement into VA on July 3, 2003, Newmont does not have the unilateral ability to control or effectively control NYOL during the VA process, and accordingly, Newmont concluded that, in accordance with paragraph 4 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 94, it is appropriate to deconsolidate NYOL from the consolidated group effective on that date.
 
In conjunction with the VA process, Newmont has made an offer to the Independent Administrator that, if accepted, would bring NYOL out of VA. The offer effectively values the assets at $200 million and may result in NYOL’s outstanding third-party Senior Note holders and the remaining hedge contract counterparty receiving not more than $0.40 on the dollar. If Newmont’s offer is accepted, NYOL would be returned to the control of its directors, and its employees would continue their employment as usual. In addition, Newmont would honor any prior unpaid obligations to NYOL’s employees and offer trade creditors payment in full.
 
In order to comply with applicable requirements and to allow holders of NYOL’s outstanding 8 7/8% Senior Notes more time to assess these developments, YBCL, extended the expiration of the offer to acquire the Senior Notes to July 11, 2003. YBCL subsequently extended the deadline to July 18, 2003. Since June 30, 2003, YBCL has received additional tenders for an additional $40.2 million of principal, such that YBCL has now received
 
86

tenders for a total of $237.0 million of principal, or 99.9% of the original $237.2 million outstanding third-party principal at the date of its initial offer.
 
In April 2002, Newmont announced the redemption of all issued and outstanding shares of its $3.25 convertible preferred stock as of May 15, 2002. The Company paid a redemption price of $50.325 per share, plus $0.8125 per share for all accrued dividends at the redemption date. In settlement of the total redemption price of $51.1375 per share, Newmont issued to holders of record 1.9187 shares of its common stock. This redemption eliminated $7.5 million of annual preferred stock dividends prospectively.
 
During the first quarter of 2003, the Company repurchased $23.0 million, $52.3 million, $10.0 million and $30.9 million face amount of its outstanding 8 3 /8%, 8 5 /8%, Newmont Australia Limited 7 1 /2% and Newmont Australia Limited 7 5 /8% debentures, respectively, for total cash consideration of $135.8 million. Newmont recorded a pre-tax charge of $19.5 million, net of discounts, premiums and capitalized debt issue costs, related to these repurchases during the first quarter of 2003.
 
During the first half 2003, Newmont repaid $15 million of the Ovacik project financing facility, of which $4 million represented scheduled repayments and $11 million represented early extinguishments at face value. $5 million of this was repaid in the first quarter of 2003. $19.1 million of the Otter Gold Co. facility was repaid in the second quarter of 2003. Of this amount $5.3 million represented an early extinguishment at face value. Also during the first half of 2003, $15 million of medium term notes matured, $14 million of the Minera Yanacocha trust certificates matured, $5 million of A Tranche of the Minera Yanacocha $100 million credit facility matured and $6 million of the Minera Yanacocha Banco de Peru facility matured.
 
On April 22, 2003, Newmont filed post-effective amendments to previous Registration Statements on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the purpose of increasing its existing universal shelf registration from $500 million to $1.0 billion. This filing will provide the capability to access capital markets for debt or equity securities as required and as market conditions warrant. This Form S-3 has not yet been declared effective.
 
Environmental
 
The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and are generally becoming more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations so as to protect the public health and environment and believes its operations are in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations, but cannot predict the amount of such future expenditures. Estimated future reclamation costs are based principally on legal and regulatory requirements. At June 30, 2003 and at December 31, 2002, $379.8 million and $254.1 million, respectively, were accrued for reclamation costs relating to currently producing mineral properties. On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS 143, “Asset Retirements Obligations” (see Accounting Changes).
 
In addition, the Company is involved in several matters concerning environmental obligations associated with former mining activities. Generally, these matters concern developing and implementing remediation plans at the various sites involved. The Company believes that the related environmental obligations associated with these sites are similar in nature with respect to the development of remediation plans, their risk profile and the compliance required to meet general environmental standards. Based upon the Company’s best estimate of its liability for these matters, $62.5 million and $48.1 million were accrued for such obligations at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Depending upon the ultimate resolution of these matters, the Company believes that it is reasonably possible that the liability for these matters could be as much as 49% greater or 32% lower than the amount accrued at June 30, 2003. The amounts accrued for these matters are reviewed periodically based upon facts and circumstances available at the time. Changes in estimates are charged to Costs and expenses, Other in the period estimates are revised.
 
87

For more information on the Company’s reclamation and remediation liabilities, see Notes 12 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
During the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 capital expenditures were approximately $26.7 million and $5.3 million, respectively, to comply with environmental regulations. Expenditures of $40.5 million are anticipated for the full year 2003, primarily at Minera Yanacocha. Ongoing costs to comply with environmental regulations have not been a significant component of cash operating costs.
 
Newmont spent $5.5 million and $4.8 million during the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively, for environmental obligations related to the former mining sites discussed in Note 25 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as updated in Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 contained herein, and expects to spend approximately $14.4 million for the full year 2003.
 
Market Conditions and Risks
 
Metal Price
 
Changes in the market price of gold significantly affect Newmont’s profitability and cash flow. Gold prices can fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors, such as demand; forward selling by producers; central bank sales, purchases and lending; investor sentiment and global mine production levels. The gold price fell to a 20-year low of $253 in July 1999 and recovered significantly since that time to reach a level of $343 by December 31, 2002. During 2003, the price has been consistently above $320 and was $345 at June 30, 2003. Changes in the market price of copper also affect Newmont’s profitability and cash flow from its Batu Hijau mine in Indonesia and its Golden Grove mine in Australia.
 
Hedging
 
Newmont generally sells its gold production at market prices. Newmont has historically, on a limited basis, entered into derivative contracts to protect the selling price for certain anticipated gold production and to manage risks associated with sales contracts, commodities, interest rates and foreign currency. In addition, at the time of the Normandy acquisition, three of its affiliates had a substantial derivative instrument position. These three affiliates are now known as Newmont Gold Treasury Pty Ltd, Newmont NFM and NYOL. Following the Normandy acquisition, however, and in accordance with the Company’s non-hedging philosophy, efforts to reduce and simplify the Normandy hedge positions have been undertaken. Accordingly, the Normandy gold hedge books have been reduced by approximately 9.1 million ounces since February 2002. During the quarter, in non-NYOL entities, 1.17 million ounces of committed forward contracts were closed out, 22,000 ounces of committed contracts were delivered into and 52,000 ounces of uncommitted puts either lapsed or were exercised. In NYOL, 2,877,000 ounces were bought back as part of the offer to acquire the hedge book liability. On May 28, 2003, YBCL made an offer to acquire all of NYOL’s gold hedge contracts from the counterparties at $0.50 per $1.00 of net mark-to-market hedge liability as of May 22, 2003. As of June 30, 2003, six of the total of seven counterparties to the gold hedge contracts, representing 94% of the gold ounces in the NYOL hedge book and 76% of the mark-to-market May 22, 2003 hedge liability, had assigned their hedge contracts to YBCL. Also during the quarter, a further 126,000 ounces of NYOL positions to buy gold were closed out or matured. In total, the Australian hedge books were reduced by 4.96 million committed ounces and 862,000 uncommitted ounces during the first half of 2003. In the first half of 2002, commencing with the acquisition of Normandy on February 15, 2002, the gold hedge book was reduced by 1,071,000 ounces. Committed contracts were reduced by 724,000 ounces by delivering into 218,000 ounces and unwinding 506,000 ounces. Similarly, uncommitted contracts for 347,000 ounces were either delivered, closed out or converted from committed contracts during the period ending June 30, 2002.
 
The result of the activity in the first half year of 2003 was that the Normandy gold hedge books were reduced to 195,000 committed ounces and 632,000 uncommitted ounces for a total of 827,000 ounces of outstanding positions at June 30, 2003. The mark-to-market valuation of the Normandy gold hedge books at June 30, 2003 represented a liability of approximately $18.7 million broken down as follows: Newmont Gold
 
88

Treasury Pty Ltd $(7.6) million; and NYOL $(11.1) million. This valuation compares to a mark-to-market valuation of the Normandy gold hedge books at December 31, 2002 of negative $433 million broken down as follows: Newmont Gold Treasury Pty Ltd $(122) million; Newmont NFM $(23) million; and NYOL $(288) million.
 
The following table shows the approximate sensitivities of the US$18.7 mark-to-market value of the Normandy gold hedge books to certain market variables as of June 30, 2003 (actual changes in the timing and amount of the following variables may differ from the assumed changes below):
 
 	  	Change in Variable
	  	Change in Mark-to-Market
Value (millions)
	
A$ Interest Rates	  	+/-1.0%	  	-/+ $1.3	
US$/A$ Exchange Rates	  	+/-$0.01	  	+/-$6.0	
Gold Lease Rates	  	+/-1.0%	  	+/-$2.0	
US$ Interest Rates	  	+/-1.0%	  	-/+$0.1	
US$ Gold Price/oz.	  	+/-$1.00	  	-/+$1.5	
 
Newmont is not required to place collateral with respect to commodity instruments and there are no margin calls associated with such contracts. Credit risk is minimized by dealing only with major financial institutions/counterparties. All of NYOL’s remaining hedge positions are governed by an agreement that confers on the relevant counterparty a right to terminate the position prior to its agreed scheduled maturity date. Such a termination would result in an immediate cash settlement of that contract based on the market value on the date of termination and could result in a cash settlement obligation to NYOL hedge counterparties in excess of available funds. Subsequent to June 30, 2003 NYOL was placed into VA which may impact on the rights to terminate, (see Note 21 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Subsequent Events,). NYOL obligations are non-recourse to Newmont and its other subsidiaries.
 
The tables below summarizes those NYOL contracts that were subject to rights to terminate and the mark-to-market value of those contracts as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively:
 
 	  	Ounces of Gold	  	Fair Value	 	 	Ounces of Gold	 	 	Fair Value	 	
Potential Termination Date (1)
	  	at June 20, 2003
	  	at June 30, 2003
	 	 	at December 31, 2002
	 	 	At December 31, 2002
	 	
 	  	 	  	(in millions)	 	 	 	 	 	(in millions)	 	
January, 2004	  	 	  	$	 	 	 	(780,000	)	 	$	11.8	 	
June, 2004	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	(133,335	)	 	 	(10.4	)	
April, 2005	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	(840,000	)	 	 	(31.0	)	
May, 2005	  	(195,000)	  	 	(4.9	)	 	(195,000	)	 	 	(15.7	)	
June, 2005	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	30,000	 	 	 	(12.0	)	
August, 2005	  	 	  	 	 	 	 	(1,304,997	)	 	 	(105.7	)	
October, 2006	  	 	  	 	0.8	 	 	 	 	 	 	(13.0	)(2)	
 	  		  				 			 				
Total	  	(195,000)	  	$	(4.1	)	 	(3,223,332	)	 	$	(176.0	)	

(1)	 	Earliest possible termination date permitted under the contract	
(2)	 	This position, which forms part of the US$/Gold swap contracts, is with a different counterparty than the original swap transaction and has no ounces associated with it.	
 
Gold Commodity Contracts
 
The tables below are expressed in thousands of ounces of gold, and prices for contracts denominated in A$ have been translated to US$ at the exchange rate of US$0.67 and US$0.56 per A$1 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
 
89

Gold Forward Sales Contracts
 
Newmont had no gold forward commodity contracts outstanding at June 30, 2003 (unaudited) and had the following gold forward contracts as at December 31, 2002:
 
Gold Forward Sales Contracts
at December 31, 2002:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
December 31,
2002
	 	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  			
(A$ denominated)	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	US$ (000)	 	
Fixed Forwards:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	1,022	  	 	1,060	  	 	227	  	 	52	  	 	26	  	 	—	  	 	2,387	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	297	  	$	300	  	$	293	  	$	266	  	$	254	  	$	—	  	$	297	  	$	(138,095	)	
Floating Rate Forwards:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	61	  	 	231	  	 	184	  	 	31	  	 	507	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	332	  	$	342	  	$	352	  	$	348	  	$	345	  	$	(37,401	)	
Synthetic Forwards:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	39	  	 	80	  	 	80	  	 	80	  	 	80	  	 	80	  	 	439	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	313	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	306	  	$	(34,222	)	
Total:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	1,061	  	 	1,140	  	 	368	  	 	363	  	 	290	  	 	111	  	 	3,333	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	298	  	$	300	  	$	302	  	$	323	  	$	330	  	$	317	  	$	305	  	$	(209,717	)	

Note:     Fixed forward sales contracts provide for delivery of a specified number of ounces at a specified price and date and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Floating rate forward contracts provide for a gold lease rate component in the price that takes into account market lease rates over the term of the contract. Gold lease rates reflect the borrowing cost for gold. Variations in gold lease rates have historically not materially impacted on the actual realized price achieved on the contract. As such, these contracts have been statistically proven to qualify as highly effective cash flow hedges under FAS 133. Synthetic forward contracts represent combinations of purchased put options and written call options at the same strike price, maturity date and number of ounces. The combination achieves the same risk management result as gold forward sales contracts. Both floating rate forwards and synthetic forwards are accounted for as cash flow hedges.
 
Gold Put Option Contracts
 
Newmont had the following gold put option contracts at June 30, 2003 (unaudited) and December 31, 2002:
 
Gold Put Option Contracts at
June 30, 2003:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
June 30, 2003
	 	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  	US$ (000)
	 	
US$ Denominated Fixed Purchased Puts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	105	  	 	203	  	 	205	  	 	100	  	 	20	  	 	—	  	 	632	  	$	(7,591	)	
Average price	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	338	  	$	397	  	$	—	  	$	303	  	 	 	 	
				
Gold Put Option Contracts at
December 31, 2002:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
December 31,
2002
	 	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  	US$ (000)
	 	
US$ Denominated Fixed Purchased Puts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	209	  	 	203	  	 	205	  	 	100	  	 	20	  	 	—	  	 	737	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	292	  	$	338	  	$	397	  	$	—	  	$	301	  	$	(6,773	)	
A$ Denominated Fixed Purchased Puts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	91	  	 	88	  	 	49	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	228	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	312	  	$	318	  	$	309	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	314	  	$	(3,690	)	
A$ Denominated Floating Forward Purchased Puts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	16	  	 	—	  	 	207	  	 	69	  	 	—	  	 	287	  	 	579	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	316	  	$	—	  	$	332	  	$	342	  	$	—	  	$	344	  	$	338	  	$	(12,140	)	
Total:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	316	  	 	291	  	 	461	  	 	169	  	 	20	  	 	287	  	 	1,544	  	 	 	 	
Average Price	  	$	299	  	$	300	  	$	312	  	$	340	  	$	397	  	$	344	  	$	317	  	$	(22,603	)	

Note:     Fixed purchased put option contracts provide the right, but not the obligation, to sell a specified number of ounces at a specified strike price and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Floating forward purchased put
 
90

option contracts provide for a variable gold lease rate component in the strike price. These options are accounted for as cash flow hedges. Variations in gold lease rates have historically not materially impacted on the actual realized price achieved on the contract. Through December 31, 2002, the floating forward purchased put option contracts were accounted for as cash flow hedges as they were statistically proven to qualify as highly effective cash flow hedges through that date. However, during the first quarter of 2003 due to changes in market conditions, these contracts were no longer considered highly effective cash flow hedges.
 
Gold Convertible Put Options and Other Instruments
 
Newmont had the following gold convertible put option contracts and other instruments outstanding at June 30, 2003 (unaudited) and December 31, 2002:
 
Gold Put Option and Other
Instruments at June 30, 2003:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
June 30, 2003
	 	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  	US$ (000)
	 	
(A$ Denominated)	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	
Indexed Forward Contracts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	33	  	 	65	  	 	65	  	 	32	  	 	195	  	$	(4,937	)	
Average price	  	$	—	  	$	 	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	$	361	  	 	 	 	
				
Gold Put Option and Other
Instruments at December 31, 2002:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
December 31,
2002
	 	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  	US$ (000)
	 	
(A$ Denominated)	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	 	
Floating Convertible Put Options:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	116	  	 	1,015	  	 	1,131	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	352	  	$	379	  	$	376	  	$	(102,952	)	
Knock-out/knock-in Contracts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	46	  	 	37	  	 	49	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	132	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	311	  	$	311	  	$	311	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	311	  	$	(6,794	)	
Indexed Forward Contracts:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	—	  	 	33	  	 	65	  	 	65	  	 	33	  	 	196	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	305	  	$	(15,740	)	
Total:	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	  	 	 	 	
Ounces	  	 	46	  	 	37	  	 	82	  	 	65	  	 	181	  	 	1,048	  	 	1,459	  	 	 	 	
Average price	  	$	311	  	$	311	  	$	308	  	$	305	  	$	335	  	$	377	  	$	361	  	$	(125,486	)	

Note:     Gold put option contracts and other instruments are composed of: a) Convertible option contracts that provide minimum price protection for covered ounces, while providing the opportunity to participate in higher market prices under certain market conditions, and are accounted for as cash flow hedges. These contracts have a floating lease rate component. Variations in gold lease rates have historically not materially impacted on the actual realized price achieved on the contract. As such, these contracts have been statistically proven to qualify as highly effective cash flow hedges under SFAS 133; b) Knock-out/knock-in option contracts are contingent sold call options that either terminate (or knock-out) and maintain upside gold price potential or convert (or knock-in) to sold call options, depending on certain market conditions, and are marked to market, with the change reflected in income; and c) Indexed forward contracts that are potentially convertible to purchased put options, depending on the market gold price at set future value dates during the term of the contract, and are marked to market, with the change reflected in income.
 
91

Gold Sold Convertible Put Options
 
Newmont had no sold convertible put contracts outstanding as at June 30, 2003 (unaudited) and the following contracts outstanding as at December 31, 2002:
 
Sold Convertible Put Options
Contracts at December 31, 2002:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
December 31,
2002
	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  	US$ (000)
	
(A$ Denominated)	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	
Ounces	  	 	—	  	 	30	  	 	60	  	 	60	  	 	60	  	 	30	  	 	240	  	 	 	
Average price	  	$	—	  	$	331	  	$	334	  	$	337	  	$	339	  	$	342	  	$	337	  	$	14,295	

Note:     Sold convertible put options are contracts that commit Newmont to buy gold ounces under certain market conditions at a predetermined price on a specified future date. At December 31, 2002 Newmont had a sold gold convertible put position of 240,000 ounces. This position was originally overlaid with a bought convertible put position, however, the bought position was closed out during the quarter. As the contracts are to buy gold, they cannot be treated as cash flow hedges; they are therefore marked to market with the change reflected in income. The cash impact on the close out of this position was an outflow of $10.9 million.
 
US$/Gold Swap Contracts
 
Newmont Australia entered into a US$/gold swap contract whereby principal payments on US$ bonds are swapped into gold-denominated payments of 600,000 ounces in 2008. Newmont Australia also receives US$ fixed interest payments and pays gold lease rates, which are indexed to market rates. This instrument was marked to market at each period end, with the change reflected in income up until the contract was closed out during the YBCL buy back transaction mentioned above. However, the indexed portion of the transaction was held with the one counterparty who did not accept the offer. As such this portion of the transaction continues to be marked to market at each period end, with the change reflected in income. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 the instrument had a negative fair value of $6.2 million and $47.8 million, respectively.
 
Other Sales Contracts, Commodity and Derivative Instruments
 
Foreign Currency
 
In addition to the U.S., Newmont conducts gold operations in Australia, New Zealand, Peru, Indonesia, Canada, Uzbekistan, Bolivia and Turkey. To the extent that there are fluctuations in local currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar, the devaluation of a local currency is generally economically neutral or beneficial to most operations since local salaries and supply contracts will decrease against the U.S. dollar based revenue stream. The appreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies against the U.S. dollar can increase the costs of gold production in U.S. dollar terms at mines located outside the United States, making such mines less profitable. Foreign currency exchange rate gains (losses) were $27.2 million and $6.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively and $51.9 million and ($1.5) million for the six month ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively (see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements).
 
Newmont acquired certain currency swap contracts as part of the Normandy acquisition intended to hedge the currency risk on repayment of US$-denominated debt. These contracts were closed out during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 for net proceeds of $50.8 million. The contracts were accounted for on a mark-to-market basis until closed out, resulting in a loss to income of $10.9 million for the first quarter of 2002.
 
Newmont also acquired currency swap contracts as part of the Normandy acquisition to receive Australian dollars and pay US dollars designated as hedges of A$-denominated debt. The A$-denominated debt was repaid during the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and the contracts are currently undesignated. The contracts are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, they had a negative fair value of $2.7 million and $21.9 million, respectively. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively, Newmont had
 
92

the following foreign currency contracts outstanding. Prices for contracts denominated in A$ have been translated at the exchange rates at June 30, 2003 of US$0.67 per A$1 and at December 31, 2002 of US$0.56 per A$1.
 
A$/US$ Currency Exchange
Contracts at June 30, 2003:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
June 30,
2003
	 	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  			
 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	US$ (000)	 	
Notional Amounts $US (000)	  	$	9,869	  	$	56,112	  	$	30,700	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	96,681	  	$	(2,704	)	
Average Exchange Rate (US$ per A$1) Average price	  	$	0.718	  	$	0.646	  	$	0.682	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	0.664	  	 	 	 	
 
A$/US$ Currency Exchange
Contracts at December 31, 2002:
	  	Expected Maturity Date or Transaction Date
	  	Total/
Average
	  	Fair Value
December 31,
2002
	 	
	  	2003
	  	2004
	  	2005
	  	2006
	  	2007
	  	Thereafter
	  		  			
 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	 	  	US$ (000)	 	
Notional Amounts $US (000)	  	$	45,390	  	$	56,112	  	$	30,700	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	132,202	  	$	(21,924	)	
Average Exchange Rate (US$ per A$1) Average price	  	$	0.645	  	$	0.646	  	$	0.682	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	—	  	$	0.654	  	 	 	 	
 
Interest Rate Swaps
 
In the Normandy transaction, Newmont acquired A$125 million of interest rate swap contracts covering a portion of Newmont Australia’s US$100 million, 7-year bonds. The net effect of these contracts is the receipt of interest in US$ at 7.5% and payment of interest in A$ at 6.54%. Newmont also acquired A$5 million of interest rate swap contracts covering a subsidiary loan. For the first half of 2002, these transactions resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $0.8 million. These contracts were closed out during the quarter ended June 30, 2002.
 
During the last half of 2001, Newmont entered into contracts to hedge the interest rate risk exposure on a portion of its $275 million 8.625% notes and its $200 million 8.375% debentures. Newmont receives fixed-rate interest payments at 8.625% and 8.375% and pays floating-rate interest amounts based on periodic LIBOR settings plus a spread, ranging from 2.60% to 4.25%. The notional principal amount of these transactions (representing the amount of principal tied to floating interest rate exposure) was $200 million at both June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. Half of these contracts expire in July 2005 and half expire in May 2011. For the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, these transactions resulted in a reduction in interest expense of $1.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively, and $3.6 million and $2.9 million for the first halves of 2003 and 2002, respectively. These transactions have been designated as fair value hedges and had fair values of $21.1 million and $13.8 million at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.
 
Fixed Rate Debt
 
Newmont has both fixed and variable rate debt. Without considering the specialized $145 million Prepaid Forward Sales Obligation , 80% and 82% of debt was fixed and 20% and 18% was variable at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively after taking into account the debt converted to variable rate using interest rate swaps (See Interest Rate Swap Contracts above). The Company’s fixed rate debt exposure at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 is summarized as follows:
 
 	  	June 30,
2003
	  	December 31,
2002
	
 	  	(in millions)	
Carrying value of fixed rate debt*	  	$	652	  	$	766	
Fair value of fixed rate debt*	  	$	727	  	$	851	
Pro forma fair value sensitivity of fixed rate debt of a +/- 10 basis point interest rate change**	  	$	+/-1.9	  	$	+/-2.9	

*	 	Excludes specialized and hybrid debt instruments for which it is not practicable to estimate fair values and pro forma fair values or sensitivities. These instruments include the Sale-Leaseback of the Refractory Ore	
 
93

 	Treatment Plant, Newmont Yandal 8 7 /8% notes, Prepaid Forward Sales Obligation, Minera Yanacocha Trust Certificates and certain capital leases.	
**	 	The pro forma information assumes a +/-10 basis point change in market interest rates at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and reflects the corresponding estimated change in the fair value of fixed rate debt outstanding at that date under that assumption.	
 
Pension and Other Benefit Plans
 
Pension and other benefit plan costs can be impacted by actual results that differ from assumptions selected. These differences are reflected in financial results over future periods. Actual returns (losses) on pension assets were $(11.1), $0.9 and $(1.6) million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, compared to expected returns of $14.4, $15.5 and $16.7 million for the same periods. If the difference between expected returns and actual results falls outside certain limits, the difference will be amortized into future earnings on a straight-line basis over the average remaining working life of the participants (currently 12 years). Future amortization resulting from lower actual returns averages $0.8 million (after tax) per annum for the next several years. The following table provides details of the pension plans asset mix at January 1, 2003:
 
Asset Class
	  	Actual
Mix
	 	 	Target
Mix
	 	 	Expected
Rate Of
Return
	 	 	Standard
Deviation
or Volatility
	 	
U.S. Equity investments	  	44	%	 	45	%	 	9.5	%	 	17.9	%	
International equity investments	  	20	%	 	20	%	 	10.7	%	 	21.1	%	
Fixed income investments	  	34	%	 	35	%	 	6.6	%	 	7.0	%	
Cash and cash equivalents	  	2	%	 	 	 	 	4.3	%	 	2.8	%	
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 			 			
 	  	 	 	 	 	 	 	8.1	%	 	14.9	%	
 
The Plan’s Trustees evaluate the level of volatility within the total Trust and each of its component investments making appropriate inquiries to the plans’ investment advisors when prudent. Contributions to the pension plans were $12.3, $11.3 and $3.8 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Funding in 2003 is expected to be approximately $21.0 million to $24.0 million, of which approximately $6.5 million has been funded through June 30, 2003.
 
If the 8% rate of return on plan assets would have been used instead of the 9.25% estimated at January 1, 2002, pension expense would have increased by $1.0 million in the first half of 2002.
 
A 0.25% reduction in the discount rate assumption (to 6.5%) would have increased pension expense by $0.5 million and other benefits expense $0.25 million in the first half of 2002 had such a rate been determined as the appropriate rate to use. Such a change would have no impact on future pension funding requirements.
 
Safe Harbor Statement
 
Certain statements contained in this report (including information incorporated by reference) are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and are intended to be covered by the safe harbor provided for under these sections. Our forward-looking statements include, without limitation: (a) statements regarding future earnings, and the sensitivity of earnings to gold and other metal prices; (b) estimates of future mineral production and sales for specific operations and on a consolidated basis; (c) estimates of future production costs and other expenses, for specific operations and on a consolidated basis; (d) estimates of future cash flows and the sensitivity of cash flows to gold and other metal prices; (e) estimates of future capital expenditures and other cash needs for specific operations and on a consolidated basis and expectations as to the funding thereof; (f) statements as to the projected development of certain ore deposits, including estimates of development and other capital costs, financing plans for these deposits, and expected production commencement dates; (g) estimates of future costs and other liabilities for certain environmental matters; (h) estimates of
 
94

reserves, and statements regarding future exploration results and reserve replacement; (i) statements regarding modifications to Newmont’s hedge positions; (j) statements regarding the timing or likelihood that Newmont will regain control of NYOL or its assets; (k) statements regarding future transactions relating to portfolio management or rationalization efforts; and (l) projected synergies and costs associated with acquisitions and related matters.
 
Where we express an expectation or belief as to future events or results, such expectation or belief is expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis. However, our forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected, or implied by those forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking statements (“cautionary statements”) are disclosed under “Risk Factors” in the Newmont Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as well as in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Many of these factors are beyond Newmont’s ability to control or predict. Given these uncertainties, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.
 
All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to Newmont or to persons acting on its behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Newmont disclaims any intention or obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.
 
ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
 
During the fiscal period covered by this report, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods.
 
Even an effective internal control system, no matter how well designed, has inherent limitations—including the possibility of the circumvention or overriding of controls. Therefore, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the reliability of the Company’s financial reporting and financial statement preparation.
 
There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or that is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
 
95

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
 
Information regarding legal proceedings is contained in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this  Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
 
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 7, 2003, all fourteen directors nominated to serve as directors of Registrant were elected. The vote was as follows:
 
Nominee
	  	For
	  	Withheld
	  	Abstentions
	  	Non-Votes
	
Glen A. Barton	  	283,661,820	  	3,459,927	  	––	  	––	
Vincent A. Calarco	  	283,289,419	  	3,832,328	  	––	  	––	
James T. Curry, Jr.	  	283,318,900	  	3,802,847	  	––	  	––	
Joseph P. Flannery	  	283,607,903	  	3,513,844	  	––	  	––	
Michael S. Hamson	  	283,373,082	  	3,748,665	  	––	  	––	
Leo I. Higdon, Jr.	  	283,682,585	  	3,439,162	  	––	  	––	
Pierre Lassonde	  	211,337,767	  	75,783,980	  	––	  	––	
Robert L. Miller	  	207,879,290	  	79,242,457	  	––	  	––	
Wayne W. Murdy	  	283,373,068	  	3,748,679	  	––	  	––	
Robin A. Plumbridge	  	283,315,133	  	3,806,614	  	––	  	––	
John B. Prescott	  	283,680,852	  	3,440,895	  	––	  	––	
Michael K. Reilly	  	283,679,803	  	3,441,944	  	––	  	––	
Seymour Schulich	  	283,730,718	  	3,391,029	  	––	  	––	
James V. Taranik	  	282,472,258	  	4,649,489	  	––	  	––	
 
ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
 
(a) The exhibits to this report are listed in the Exhibit Index.
 
(b) Reports filed on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2003:
 
 	•	 	Report dated May 7, 2003, announcing financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.	
 
 	•	 	Report dated April 22, 2003, providing pro forma financial information relating to the acquisition of Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation Limited and Normandy Mining Limited.	
 
 	•	 	Report dated April 15, 2003, filing Amendment No. 2 to Form 8-K as related to Franco-Nevada Mining Corporation Limited and Normandy Mining Limited.	
 
96

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 	 	 	 	N EWMONT M INING C ORPORATION
(Registrant)	
				
Date: October 24, 2003	 	 	 	 	 	/s/    B RUCE D. H ANSEN        
	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Bruce D. Hansen
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)	

Date: October 24, 2003	 	 	 	 	 	/s/    D AVID W. P EAT      
	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	David W. Peat
Vice President and
Global Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)	
 
97

NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION
 
EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit
Number
	  	Description

10.1	  	Newmont Officers’ Death Benefit Plan Trust Agreement dated February 1, 2003 between Newmont USA Limited and BNY Western Trust Company, filed with the original Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed on August 4, 2003.	
		
12.1	  	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges, filed herewith.	
		
31.1	  	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Principal Executive Officer, filed herewith.	
		
31.2	  	Certification Pursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15-D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by the Chief Financial Officer, filed herewith.	
		
32.1	  	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Principal Executive Officer, furnished herewith.1	
		
32.2	  	Statement Required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 signed by Chief Financial Officer, furnished herewith.1	

1	 	This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release Nos. 33-8212 and 34-47551.	

 
98
 
Exhibit 12.1
 
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Amounts in thousands except ratio)

 	  	Six Months Ended
June 30, 2003
	 	
Earnings:	  	 	 	 	
Income before income taxes, net of minority interest in income of affiliates	  	$	487,443	 	
Adjustments:	  	 	 	 	
Net interest expense (1)	  	 	52,615	 	
Amortization of capitalized interest	  	 	3,159	 	
Portion of rental expense representative of interest	  	 	1,653	 	
Undistributed income of affiliate	  	 	(93,207	)	
Minority interest in net income of affiliates	  	 	73,596	 	
 	  				
 	  	$	525,259	 	
 	  				
Fixed Charges:	  	 	 	 	
Net interest expense (1)	  	 	52,615	 	
Capitalized interest	  	 	3,048	 	
Portion of rental expense representative of interest	  	 	1,653	 	
 	  				
 	  	$	57,316	 	
 	  				
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges	  	 	9.2	 	

(1)	 	Includes interest expense of majority-owned subsidiaries and amortization of debt issuance costs.	

Exhibit 31.1
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
I, Wayne W. Murdy, certify that: 
 
 	1.	 	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Newmont Mining Corporation;	
 
 	2.	 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	
 
 	3.	 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	
 
 	4.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:	
 
 	(a)	 	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 
 	(b)	 	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 
 	(c)	 	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	
 
 	5.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):	
 
 	(a)	 	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and	
 
 	(b)	 	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	

/s/    W AYNE W. M URDY
	
Wayne W. Murdy
Chief Executive Officer	
 
October 24, 2003
 
Exhibit 31.2
 
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
(Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
I, Bruce D. Hansen, certify that: 
 
 	1.	 	I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Newmont Mining Corporation;	
 
 	2.	 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	
 
 	3.	 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	
 
 	4.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:	
 
 	(a)	 	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 
 	(b)	 	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 
 	(c)	 	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and	
 
 	5.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):	
 
 	(a)	 	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and	
 
 	(b)	 	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	

/s/    B RUCE D. H ANSEN
	
Bruce D. Hansen
Chief Financial Officer	
 
October	 	24, 2003	
 
Exhibit 32.1
 
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
 
(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
I, Wayne W. Murdy, Chief Executive Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 	1.	 	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and	
 
 	2.	 	the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.	

/s/    W AYNE W. M URDY
	
Wayne W. Murdy
Chief Executive Officer	
 
October 24, 2003
 
Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
Exhibit 32.2
 
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
 
(Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
I, Bruce D. Hansen, Chief Financial Officer of Newmont Mining Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 	1.	 	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and	
 
 	2.	 	the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.	

/s/    B RUCE D. H ANSEN
	
Bruce D. Hansen
Chief Financial Officer	
 
October 24, 2003
 
Note: A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.