|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Basis of Presentation |
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. |
|
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2013. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014. The Company prepares its financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”). This basis of accounting involves the application of accrual accounting and consequently, revenues and gains are recognized when earned, and expenses and losses are recognized when incurred. |
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary companies. On consolidation, all inter-entity transactions and balances have been eliminated. |
|
The financial statements are expressed in U.S. funds. |
|
Management has performed an evaluation of the Company’s activities through the date and time these financial statements were issued and concluded that there are no additional significant events requiring recognition or disclosure. |
|
2. |
Adoption of New Accounting Standards |
Revenue Recognition and Disclosures |
|
The FASB issued Update No. 2013-04, “Liabilities (Topic 405)—Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date”. The amendments in this Update provide guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of this Update is fixed at the reporting date, except for obligations addressed within existing guidance in U.S. GAAP. The guidance requires an entity to measure those obligations as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. The guidance in this Update also requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation as well as other information about those obligations. For public entities, the amendments in this ASU were applicable for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
The FASB issued Update No. 2013-05, “Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830)—Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity”. The amendments in this Update resolve the diversity in practice about whether Subtopic 810-10, Consolidation—Overall, or Subtopic 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters—Translation of Financial Statements, applies to the release of the cumulative translation adjustment into net income when a parent either sells a part or all of its investment in a foreign entity or no longer holds a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets that is a nonprofit activity or a business (other than a sale of in substance real estate or conveyance of oil and gas mineral rights) within a foreign entity. In addition, the amendments in this Update resolve the diversity in practice for the treatment of business combinations achieved in stages (sometimes also referred to as step acquisitions) involving a foreign entity. For public entities, the amendments in this ASU were effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim reporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
|
The FASB issued Update No. 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Liquidation Basis of Accounting”. The objective of this Update is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting and to provide principles for the measurement of assets and liabilities under the liquidation basis of accounting, as well as any required disclosures. These amendments were effective for entities that determine liquidation is imminent during annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and interim reporting periods therein. Entitles should apply the requirements prospectively from the day that liquidation becomes imminent. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
|
The FASB issued Update No. 2013-11, “Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists”. The amendments in this ASU provide guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward exists. The amendments were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013 and should be applied prospectively to all unrecognized tax benefits that exist at the effective date. The adoption of this Statement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
|
3. |
Significant Accounting Policies |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
ASU 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for shared-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. |
|
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-12 which requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU-2014-12 is not expected to have material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
ASU No. 2014-09, Revenues from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) |
|
The FASB and IASB (the Boards) have issued converged standards on revenue recognition. ASU No. 2014-09 affects any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: |
• | Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer. | |
• | Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract. | |
• | Step 3: Determine the transaction price. | |
• | Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. | |
• | Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. |
For a public entity, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. This ASU is to be applied retrospectively, with certain practical expedients allowed. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this statement on its consolidated financial statements.
ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-08 which enhance convergence between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments in the ASU change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. It also addresses sources of confusion and inconsistent application related to financial reporting of discontinued operations guidance in U.S. GAAP. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public organizations with calendar year ends. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU-2014-08 is not expected to have material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
|
4. |
Intangible Assets |
As of June 30, 2014 NDA acquisition costs of $59 thousand (December 31, 2013 - $79 thousand) were recorded as intangible assets on the Company’s balance sheet and represent the net book value of the final progress payment related to the acquisition of 100% ownership of Forfivo XL®. The asset is being amortized over its estimated useful life of 39 months. The Company commenced amortization upon commercial launch of the product in October 2012. |
|
5. |
Deferred License Revenue |
Deferred license revenue represents upfront payments received for the granting of licenses to the Company’s patents, intellectual property, and proprietary technology, for commercialization. Deferred license revenue is recognized in income over the period where sales of the licensed products will occur. |
|
Upon entering into the licensing agreement with Edgemont Pharmaceuticals the Company received an upfront fee of $1 million, which the Company recognized as deferred license revenue. The deferred license revenue is being amortized in income over a period of 39 months, which is the minimum period where sales of Forfivo XL® are expected to be exclusive. |
|
In January, 2014 IntelGenx entered into a development and commercialization agreement with Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. for two products. The Company received $100 thousand upon execution of the agreement, of which $50 thousand has been recognized as deferred revenue until certain development milestones have been achieved. |
|
As a result of this policy, the Company has a deferred revenue balance of $512 thousand at June 30, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $616 thousand) that has not been recognized as revenue. |
|
6. |
Capital Stock |
June 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Authorized -
Issued - 63,465,255 (December 31, 2013 - 60,984,267) common shares |
$ | 635 | $ | 610 |
|
7. |
Additional Paid-In Capital |
Stock options |
|
No stock options were exercised during the six month period ended June 30, 2014. During the six month period ended June 31, 2013 a total of 75,000 stock options were exercised for 75,000 common shares having a par value of $0 thousand in aggregate, for cash consideration of $31 thousand, resulting in an increase in additional paid-in capital of $31 thousand. |
|
Compensation expenses for stock-based compensation of $65 thousand and $48 thousand were recorded during the six month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 respectively. The entire amount expensed in 2014 relates to stock options granted to employees and directors. Of the amount expensed in 2013, $37 thousand relates to stock options granted to employees and directors and $11 thousand relates to options granted to independent third party consultants. As at June 30, 2014 the Company has $161 thousand (2013 - $229 thousand) of unrecognized stock- based compensation. |
|
Warrants |
|
During the six month period ended June 30, 2014 a total of 2,480,988 (2013 - 1,584,000) warrants were exercised for 2,480,988 (2013 - 1,584,000) common shares having a par value of $0 thousand in aggregate, for cash consideration of $1,619 thousand (2013 - $751 thousand), resulting in an increase in additional paid-in capital of $1,619 thousand (2013 - $750 thousand). |
|
8. |
Related Party Transactions |
Included in management salaries are $29 thousand (2013 - $5 thousand) for options granted to the Chief Executive Officer, $Nil (2013 - $10 thousand) for options granted to the Chief Operating Officer and $22 thousand (2013 - $9 thousand) for options granted to the Chief Financial Officer under the 2006 Stock Option Plan and $8 thousand (2013 - $6 thousand) for options granted to non-employee directors. |
|
Also included in management salaries are director fees of $88 thousand (2013 - $44 thousand) for attendance to board meetings and audit committee meetings. |
|
In addition, during the first six months of 2013 the Company paid $66 thousand in fees to a director under a management consultancy agreement. No such fees were paid during the first six months of 2014. |
|
The above related party transactions have been measured at the exchange amount which is the amount of the consideration established and agreed to by the related parties. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
|
ASU 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for shared-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. |
|
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-12 which requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU-2014-12 is not expected to have material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. |
ASU No. 2014-09, Revenues from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) |
|
The FASB and IASB (the Boards) have issued converged standards on revenue recognition. ASU No. 2014-09 affects any entity using U.S. GAAP that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. This ASU will supersede the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: |
• | Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer. | |
• | Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract. | |
• | Step 3: Determine the transaction price. | |
• | Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. | |
• | Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. |
For a public entity, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. This ASU is to be applied retrospectively, with certain practical expedients allowed. Early application is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this statement on its consolidated financial statements.
ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity
The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-08 which enhance convergence between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments in the ASU change the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. It also addresses sources of confusion and inconsistent application related to financial reporting of discontinued operations guidance in U.S. GAAP. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity method investment. In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015 for public organizations with calendar year ends. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU-2014-08 is not expected to have material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
|
June 30, | December 31, | ||||||
2014 | 2013 | ||||||
Authorized -
Issued - 63,465,255 (December 31, 2013 - 60,984,267) common shares |
$ | 635 | $ | 610 |
|
|
|
|
|