| Debt
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Basis of Presentation
These statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and, in accordance with those rules and regulations, do not include all information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to fairly state the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of Teradata Corporation (“Teradata” or the “Company”) for the interim periods presented herein. The year-end 2011 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and disclosures. Actual results may vary from these estimates.
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in Teradata’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 (the “2011 Annual Report”). The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for the full year.
|
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance regarding the disclosure of comprehensive income. Under the new guidance, an entity will have the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In both choices, an entity will be required to present each component of net income along with total net income, each component of other comprehensive income along with a total for other comprehensive income, and a total amount for comprehensive income. This update will eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. Additionally, entities will be required to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income. The amendments in this update do not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. Portions of this new guidance were made effective for fiscal years, and interim periods, beginning after December 15, 2011, with amendments applied retrospectively. The Company adopted the effective portions of the new disclosure guidance as of January 1, 2012.
|
3. Supplemental Financial Information
As of | ||||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Inventories |
||||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 15 | $ | 41 | ||||
Service parts |
20 | 20 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total inventories |
$ | 35 | $ | 61 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
4. Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets
The following table identifies the activity relating to goodwill by operating segment:
In millions | Balance December 31, 2011 |
Additions | Currency Translation Adjustments |
Balance June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 543 | $ | 130 | $ | 1 | $ | 674 | ||||||||
EMEA |
120 | 55 | (2 | ) | 173 | |||||||||||
APJ |
79 | 0 | (1 | ) | 78 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total goodwill |
$ | 742 | $ | 185 | ($ | 2 | ) | $ | 925 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The changes in goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were primarily due to the acquisition of eCircle Beteiligungs GmbH which was closed in the second quarter.
Acquired intangible assets were specifically identified when acquired, and are deemed to have finite lives. The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for Teradata’s acquired intangible assets were as follows:
Original Amortization Life (in Years) |
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
In millions | Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
||||||||||||||
Acquired intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual property/developed technology |
1 to 7 | 149 | (34 | ) | 122 | (23 | ) | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
3 to 10 | 77 | (10 | ) | 55 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
Trademarks/trade names |
5 to 10 | 14 | (2 | ) | 11 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
In-process research and development |
5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
2 to 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
1 to 10 | 246 | (46 | ) | 194 | (31 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense (actual and estimated) for acquired intangible assets for the following periods is as follows:
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2012 |
For the year ended (estimated) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense |
$ | 15 | $ | 35 | $ | 38 | $ | 37 | $ | 35 | $ | 27 |
|
5. Income Taxes
Income tax provisions for interim periods are based on estimated annual income tax rates, adjusted to reflect the effects of any significant infrequent or unusual items which are required to be discretely recognized within the current interim period. The Company’s intention is to permanently reinvest its foreign earnings outside of the United States. As a result, the effective tax rates in the periods presented are largely based upon the forecasted pre-tax earnings mix and allocation of certain expenses in various taxing jurisdictions where the Company conducts its business that apply a broad range of statutory income tax rates, certain of which are less than the U.S. statutory rate.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 was 30% and 25%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011 was 29% and 26%, respectively. The tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 included a $4 million tax benefit recorded in the second quarter of 2011 related to the book gain recorded on the Company’s previous equity investment in Aster Data Systems, Inc. (“Aster Data”), which was reflected as a permanent non-taxable item. For further information regarding the Company’s acquisition of Aster Data, refer to Note 12. There were no material discrete tax items reflected in the effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012.
|
6. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
As a portion of the Company’s operations and revenue occur outside the United States and in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, the Company is exposed to potential gains and losses from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. In an attempt to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations, the Company uses foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge transactional exposures resulting predominantly from foreign currency denominated inter-company receivables and payables. The forward contracts are designated as fair value hedges of specified foreign currency denominated inter-company receivables and payables and generally mature in three months or less. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes, nor does it hold or issue leveraged derivative instruments. By using derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to changes in exchange rates, the Company exposes itself to credit risk. The Company manages exposure to counterparty credit risk by entering into derivative financial instruments with highly rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of the applicable contracts.
All derivatives are recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value. The fair values of foreign exchange contracts are based on market spot and forward exchange rates and represent estimates of possible value that may not be realized in the future. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments, along with the loss or gain on the hedged asset or liability, are recorded in current period earnings. The notional amounts represent agreed-upon amounts on which calculations of dollars to be exchanged are based, and are an indication of the extent of Teradata’s involvement in such instruments. These notional amounts do not represent amounts exchanged by the parties and, therefore, are not a measure of the instruments. Across its portfolio of contracts, Teradata has both long and short positions relative to the U.S. dollar. As a result, Teradata’s net involvement is less than the total contract notional amount of the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts.
The contract notional amount of the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts was $85 million ($23 million on a net basis) at June 30, 2012, and $102 million ($19 million on a net basis) at December 31, 2011. The fair value derivative assets and liabilities recorded in other current assets and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, were not material.
Gains and losses from the Company’s fair value hedges (foreign currency forward contracts and related hedged items) were immaterial for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012 and June 30, 2011. Gains and losses from foreign exchange forward contracts are fully recognized each period and reported along with the offsetting gain or loss of the related hedged item, either in cost of products or in other income, depending on the nature of the related hedged item.
|
7. Commitments and Contingencies
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits, claims and other matters, including those that relate to the environment, health and safety, employee benefits, export compliance, intellectual property, tax matters, and other regulatory compliance and general matters, including those described below.
The Company is subject to governmental investigations and requests for information from time to time. As previously reported prior to Teradata’s separation from NCR Corporation (“NCR”), the United States Department of Justice is conducting an investigation regarding the propriety of the Company’s arrangements or understandings with others in connection with certain federal contracts and the adequacy of certain disclosures related to such contracts. The investigation arises in connection with civil litigation in federal district court filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil False Claims Act against a number of information technology companies, including the Company. The complaints against the Company remain under seal. The Company has conducted its analysis of such claims focusing on the propriety of certain transactions under federal programs under which Teradata was a contractor. The Company has shared evidence with the Justice Department of questionable conduct that the Company uncovered, has cooperated with the Justice Department in its investigation, and is in settlement discussions with the government to resolve this matter.
A separate portion of the government’s investigation relates to the adequacy of pricing disclosures made to the government in connection with negotiation of NCR’s General Services Administration Federal Supply Schedule as it relates to Teradata, prior to the Company’s separation from NCR, and to whether certain subsequent price reductions were properly passed on to the government. Both NCR and the Company have participated in this aspect of the investigation, with respect to certain products and services of each, and each will assume financial responsibility for its own exposures, if any, without indemnification from the other.
The Company has an accrual of approximately $3 million related to the current best estimate of probable liability relating to these matters. The Company believes the amounts provided in its financial statements are adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities. The Company believes that there is not a reasonable possibility that the loss in respect of these contingent matters will materially exceed the liability reflected in the Company’s financial statements, although there can be no assurance that this will in fact be the case.
Guarantees and Product Warranties. Guarantees associated with the Company’s business activities are reviewed for appropriateness and impact to the Company’s financial statements. Periodically, the Company’s customers enter into various leasing arrangements coordinated with a leasing company. In some instances, the Company guarantees the leasing company a minimum value at the end of the lease term on the leased equipment. As of June 30, 2012, the maximum future payment obligation of this guaranteed value and the associated liability balance was $2 million.
The Company provides its customers a standard manufacturer’s warranty and records, at the time of the sale, a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future obligations due to warranty claims are based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average repair time, travel time, number of service calls and cost of replacement parts. For each consummated sale, the Company recognizes the total customer revenue and records the associated warranty liability using pre-established warranty percentages for that product class.
The following table identifies the activity relating to the warranty reserve for the six months ended June 30:
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Warranty reserve liability |
||||||||
Beginning balance at January 1 |
$ | 6 | $ | 6 | ||||
Provisions for warranties issued |
8 | 6 | ||||||
Settlements (in cash or in kind) |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at June 30 |
$ | 7 | $ | 6 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The Company also offers extended and/or enhanced coverage to its customers in the form of maintenance contracts. The Company accounts for these contracts by deferring the related maintenance revenue over the extended and/or enhanced coverage period. Costs associated with maintenance support are expensed as incurred. Amounts associated with these maintenance contracts are not included in the table above.
In addition, the Company provides its customers with certain indemnification rights. In general, the Company agrees to indemnify the customer if a third party asserts patent or other infringement on the part of the customer for its use of the Company’s products. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with the officers and directors of its subsidiaries. From time to time, the Company also enters into agreements in connection with its acquisition and divesture activities that include indemnification obligations by the Company. The fair value of these indemnification obligations is not readily determinable due to the conditional nature of the Company’s potential obligations and the specific facts and circumstances involved with each particular agreement, and as such the Company has not recorded a liability in connection with these indemnification arrangements. Historically, payments made by the Company under these types of agreements have not had a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
|
8. Fair Value Measurements
GAAP has established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; Level 2, defined as significant other observable inputs, such as quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or quoted prices in less-active markets for identical assets; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include money market funds and foreign currency exchange contracts. A portion of the Company’s excess cash reserves are held in money market funds which generate interest income based on the prevailing market rates. Money market funds are included in cash and cash equivalents in the Company’s balance sheet. Money market fund holdings are measured at fair value using quoted market prices and are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. When deemed appropriate, the Company minimizes its exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates through the use of derivative financial instruments, specifically, forward foreign exchange contracts. The fair value of these contracts are measured at the end of each interim reporting period using observable inputs other than quoted prices, specifically market spot and forward exchange rates. As such, these derivative instruments are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Fair value gains for open contracts are recognized as assets and fair value losses are recognized as liabilities. The fair value derivative assets and liabilities recorded in other current assets and accrued liabilities at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, were not material. Any realized gains or losses would be mitigated by corresponding gains or losses on the underlying exposures.
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and subject to fair value disclosure requirements at June 30, 2012 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
In millions | June 30, 2012 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Signficant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 426 | $ | 426 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and subject to fair value disclosure requirements at December 31, 2011 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
In millions | December 31, 2011 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Signficant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 471 | $ | 471 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
|
9. Debt
On June 15, 2012, Teradata entered into a new five-year revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Facility”), under which the Company may borrow up to $300 million. The Credit Facility replaces a similar revolving credit agreement in the same maximum principal amount entered into by Teradata in 2007, which agreement was terminated as of June 15, 2012. The new Credit Facility ends on June 15, 2017, at which point any remaining outstanding borrowings would be due for repayment unless extended by agreement of the parties for up to two additional one-year periods. The interest rate charged on borrowings pursuant to the Credit Facility can vary depending on the interest rate option the Company chooses to utilize and the Company’s leverage ratio at the time of the borrowing. In the near term, Teradata would anticipate choosing a floating rate based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). The Credit Facility is unsecured and contains certain representations and warranties, conditions, affirmative, negative and financial covenants, and events of default customary for such facilities.
As of June 30, 2012, the Company had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility, leaving $300 million in additional borrowing capacity available under the Credit Facility.
Teradata’s senior unsecured $300 million five-year term loan is payable in quarterly installments, which commenced on June 30, 2012, with all remaining principal due in April 2016. The outstanding principal amount of the term loan agreement bears interest at a floating rate based upon a negotiated base rate or a Eurodollar rate plus in each case a margin based on the leverage ratio of the Company. As of June 30, 2012, the term loan principal outstanding was $296 million, and carried an interest rate of 1.25%.
|
11. Segment and Other Supplemental Information
Teradata manages its business in three geographic regions, which are also the Company’s operating segments: (1) the North America and Latin America (“Americas”) region; (2) the Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) region; and (3) the Asia Pacific and Japan (“APJ”) region. Management evaluates the performance of its segments based on revenue and segment margin, and does not include segment assets for management reporting purposes. Corporate-related costs are fully allocated to the segments.
The following table presents regional segment revenue and gross margin for the Company:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 398 | $ | 339 | $ | 786 | $ | 646 | ||||||||
EMEA |
168 | 145 | 304 | 270 | ||||||||||||
APJ |
99 | 97 | 188 | 171 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
665 | 581 | 1,278 | 1,087 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross margin |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
242 | 194 | 474 | 369 | ||||||||||||
EMEA |
93 | 76 | 159 | 146 | ||||||||||||
APJ |
47 | 46 | 87 | 76 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total gross margin |
382 | 316 | 720 | 591 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
179 | 165 | 344 | 315 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
43 | 41 | 89 | 75 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total income from operations |
$ | 160 | $ | 110 | $ | 287 | $ | 201 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents revenue by product and services for the Company:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Products (software and hardware)(1) |
$ | 321 | $ | 269 | $ | 629 | $ | 504 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consulting services |
193 | 177 | 358 | 322 | ||||||||||||
Maintenance services |
151 | 135 | 291 | 261 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total services |
344 | 312 | 649 | 583 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 665 | $ | 581 | $ | 1,278 | $ | 1,087 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Our data warehousing software and hardware products are often sold and delivered together in the form of a “node” of capacity as an integrated technology solution. Accordingly, it is impracticable to provide the breakdown of revenue from various types of software and hardware products.
|
12. Business Combinations
In January 2011, Teradata completed its acquisition of 100 percent of the stock of Aprimo, Inc. (“Aprimo”). Aprimo is a global provider of cloud-based integrated marketing management (“IMM”) software solutions. The Aprimo organization now supports Teradata’s applications strategy, including development, marketing, sales and services.
In April 2011, Teradata completed its acquisition of all remaining equity of Aster Data Systems, Inc. (“Aster Data”). Aster Data is a market leader in advanced analytics and the management of diverse, multi-structured data. The combination of Teradata and Aster Data technologies enables businesses to perform better analytics on large sets of multi-structured data, also known as “big data.”
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company completed immaterial business acquisition and other investing activities, including the all-cash acquisition of 100 percent of the equity of Munich-based eCircle Beteiligungs GmbH (“eCircle”), a leading full service digital marketing provider in Europe.
|
As of | ||||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Inventories |
||||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 15 | $ | 41 | ||||
Service parts |
20 | 20 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total inventories |
$ | 35 | $ | 61 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
The following table identifies the activity relating to goodwill by operating segment:
In millions | Balance December 31, 2011 |
Additions | Currency Translation Adjustments |
Balance June 30, 2012 |
||||||||||||
Goodwill |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 543 | $ | 130 | $ | 1 | $ | 674 | ||||||||
EMEA |
120 | 55 | (2 | ) | 173 | |||||||||||
APJ |
79 | 0 | (1 | ) | 78 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total goodwill |
$ | 742 | $ | 185 | ($ | 2 | ) | $ | 925 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for Teradata’s acquired intangible assets were as follows:
Original Amortization Life (in Years) |
June 30, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
In millions | Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
||||||||||||||
Acquired intangible assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Intellectual property/developed technology |
1 to 7 | 149 | (34 | ) | 122 | (23 | ) | |||||||||||
Customer relationships |
3 to 10 | 77 | (10 | ) | 55 | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
Trademarks/trade names |
5 to 10 | 14 | (2 | ) | 11 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
In-process research and development |
5 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
2 to 2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
1 to 10 | 246 | (46 | ) | 194 | (31 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregate amortization expense (actual and estimated) for acquired intangible assets for the following periods is as follows:
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2012 |
For the year ended (estimated) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense |
$ | 15 | $ | 35 | $ | 38 | $ | 37 | $ | 35 | $ | 27 |
|
The following table identifies the activity relating to the warranty reserve for the six months ended June 30:
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Warranty reserve liability |
||||||||
Beginning balance at January 1 |
$ | 6 | $ | 6 | ||||
Provisions for warranties issued |
8 | 6 | ||||||
Settlements (in cash or in kind) |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at June 30 |
$ | 7 | $ | 6 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and subject to fair value disclosure requirements at June 30, 2012 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
In millions | June 30, 2012 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Signficant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 426 | $ | 426 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and subject to fair value disclosure requirements at December 31, 2011 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | ||||||||||||||||
In millions | December 31, 2011 | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Signficant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Money market funds |
$ | 471 | $ | 471 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 |
|
The following table presents regional segment revenue and gross margin for the Company:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Revenue |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 398 | $ | 339 | $ | 786 | $ | 646 | ||||||||
EMEA |
168 | 145 | 304 | 270 | ||||||||||||
APJ |
99 | 97 | 188 | 171 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
665 | 581 | 1,278 | 1,087 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gross margin |
||||||||||||||||
Americas |
242 | 194 | 474 | 369 | ||||||||||||
EMEA |
93 | 76 | 159 | 146 | ||||||||||||
APJ |
47 | 46 | 87 | 76 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total gross margin |
382 | 316 | 720 | 591 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
179 | 165 | 344 | 315 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
43 | 41 | 89 | 75 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total income from operations |
$ | 160 | $ | 110 | $ | 287 | $ | 201 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents revenue by product and services for the Company:
Three Months Ended June 30, |
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
In millions | 2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Products (software and hardware)(1) |
$ | 321 | $ | 269 | $ | 629 | $ | 504 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consulting services |
193 | 177 | 358 | 322 | ||||||||||||
Maintenance services |
151 | 135 | 291 | 261 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total services |
344 | 312 | 649 | 583 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
$ | 665 | $ | 581 | $ | 1,278 | $ | 1,087 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Our data warehousing software and hardware products are often sold and delivered together in the form of a “node” of capacity as an integrated technology solution. Accordingly, it is impracticable to provide the breakdown of revenue from various types of software and hardware products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|