|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Financial Statement Presentation
Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Textron Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries. Our financings are conducted through two separate borrowing groups. The Manufacturing group consists of Textron Inc. consolidated with its majority-owned subsidiaries that operate in the Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems and Industrial segments. The Finance group, which also is the Finance segment, consists of Textron Financial Corporation (TFC), its consolidated subsidiaries and three other finance subsidiaries owned by Textron Inc. We designed this framework to enhance our borrowing power by separating the Finance group. Our Manufacturing group operations include the development, production and delivery of tangible goods and services, while our Finance group provides financial services. Due to the fundamental differences between each borrowing group’s activities, investors, rating agencies and analysts use different measures to evaluate each group’s performance. To support those evaluations, we present balance sheet and cash flow information for each borrowing group within the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our Finance group provides captive financing for retail purchases and leases for new and used aircraft and equipment manufactured by our Manufacturing group. In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash received from customers or from the sale of receivables is reflected as operating activities when received from third parties. However, in the cash flow information provided for the separate borrowing groups, cash flows related to captive financing activities are reflected based on the operations of each group. For example, when product is sold by our Manufacturing group to a customer and is financed by the Finance group, the origination of the finance receivable is recorded within investing activities as a cash outflow in the Finance group’s statement of cash flows. Meanwhile, in the Manufacturing group’s statement of cash flows, the cash received from the Finance group on the customer’s behalf is recorded within operating cash flows as a cash inflow. Although cash is transferred between the two borrowing groups, there is no cash transaction reported in the consolidated cash flows at the time of the original financing. These captive financing activities, along with all significant intercompany transactions, are reclassified or eliminated in consolidation.
Collaborative Arrangements
Our Bell segment has a strategic alliance agreement with The Boeing Company (Boeing) to provide engineering, development and test services related to the V-22 aircraft, as well as to produce the V-22 aircraft, under a number of separate contracts with the U.S. Government (V-22 Contracts). The alliance created by this agreement is not a legal entity and has no employees, no assets and no true operations. This agreement creates contractual rights and does not represent an entity in which we have an equity interest. We account for this alliance as a collaborative arrangement with Bell and Boeing reporting costs incurred and revenues generated from transactions with the U.S. Government in each company’s respective income statement. Neither Bell nor Boeing is considered to be the principal participant for the transactions recorded under this agreement. Profits on cost-plus contracts are allocated between Bell and Boeing on a 50%-50% basis. Negotiated profits on fixed-price contracts are also allocated 50%-50%; however, Bell and Boeing are each responsible for their own cost overruns and are entitled to retain any cost underruns. Based on the contractual arrangement established under the alliance, Bell accounts for its rights and obligations under the specific requirements of the V-22 Contracts allocated to Bell under the work breakdown structure. We account for all of our rights and obligations, including warranty, product and any contingent liabilities, under the specific requirements of the V-22 Contracts allocated to us under the agreement. Revenues and cost of sales reflect our performance under the V-22 Contracts with revenues recognized using the units-of-delivery method. We include all assets used in performance of the V-22 Contracts that we own, including inventory and unpaid receivables and all liabilities arising from our obligations under the V-22 Contracts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Use of Estimates
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of changes, if any, are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period that they are determined.
During 2011 and 2010, we changed our estimates of revenues and costs on certain long-term contracts that are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, primarily in our Bell V-22 and H-1 programs. The changes in estimates increased income from continuing operations before income taxes in 2011 and 2010 by $54 million and $78 million, respectively, ($34 million and $49 million after tax, or $0.11 and $0.16 per diluted share, respectively). These changes were primarily related to favorable cost and operational performance. For 2011 and 2010, the gross favorable program profit adjustments totaled $83 million and $98 million, respectively. For 2011 and 2010, the gross unfavorable program profit adjustments totaled $29 million and $20 million, respectively.
Cash and Equivalents
Cash and equivalents consist of cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
Revenue Recognition
We generally recognize revenue for the sale of products, which are not under long-term contracts, upon delivery. For commercial aircraft, delivery is upon completion of manufacturing, customer acceptance, and the transfer of the risk and rewards of ownership. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities are recorded on a net basis.
When a sale arrangement involves multiple deliverables, such as sales of products that include customization and other services, we evaluate the arrangement to determine whether there are separate items that are required to be delivered under the arrangement that qualify as separate units of accounting. These arrangements typically involve the customization services we offer to customers who purchase Bell helicopters, and the services generally are provided within the first six months after the customer accepts the aircraft and assumes risk of loss. We consider the aircraft and the customization services to be separate units of accounting and allocate contract price between the two on a relative selling price basis using the best evidence of selling price for each of the arrangement deliverables, typically by reference to the price charged when the same or similar items are sold separately by us, taking into consideration any performance, cancellation, termination or refund-type provisions. We recognize revenue when the recognition criteria for each unit of accounting are met.
Long-Term Contracts — Revenues under long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Under this method, we estimate profit as the difference between the total estimated revenues and cost of a contract. We then recognize that estimated profit over the contract term based on either the units-of-delivery method or the cost-to-cost method (which typically is used for development effort as costs are incurred), as appropriate under the circumstances. Revenues under fixed-price contracts generally are recorded using the units-of-delivery method. Revenues under cost-reimbursement contracts are recorded using the cost-to-cost method.
Long-term contract profits are based on estimates of total contract cost and revenues utilizing current contract specifications, expected engineering requirements, the achievement of contract milestones and product deliveries. Certain contracts are awarded with fixed-price incentive fees that also are considered when estimating revenues and profit rates. Contract costs typically are incurred over a period of several years, and the estimation of these costs requires substantial judgment. Our cost estimation process is based on the professional knowledge and experience of engineers and program managers along with finance professionals. We update our projections of costs at least semiannually or when circumstances significantly change. When adjustments are required, any changes from prior estimates are recognized using the cumulative catch-up method with the impact of the change from inception-to-date recorded in the current period. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full in the period in which the losses become probable and estimable.
Finance Revenues — Finance revenues include interest on finance receivables, direct loan origination costs and fees received, and capital and leveraged lease earnings, as well as portfolio gains/losses. Portfolio gains/losses include gains/losses on the sale or early termination of finance assets and impairment charges related to repossessed assets and properties and operating assets received in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables. Revenues on direct loan origination costs and fees received are deferred and amortized to finance revenues over the contractual lives of the respective receivables and credit lines using the interest method. When receivables are sold or prepaid, unamortized amounts are recognized in finance revenues.
We recognize interest using the interest method, which provides a constant rate of return over the terms of the receivables. Accrual of interest income is suspended if credit quality indicators suggest full collection of principal and interest is doubtful. In addition, we automatically suspend the accrual of interest income for accounts that are contractually delinquent by more than three months unless collection is not doubtful. Cash payments on nonaccrual accounts, including finance charges, generally are applied to reduce the net investment balance. We resume the accrual of interest when the loan becomes contractually current through payment according to the original terms of the loan or, if a loan has been modified, following a period of performance under the terms of the modification, provided we conclude that collection of all principal and interest is no longer doubtful. Previously suspended interest income is recognized at that time.
Finance Receivables Held for Sale
Finance receivables are classified as held for sale based on the determination that we no longer intend to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future, until maturity or payoff, or we no longer have the ability to hold to maturity. Our decision to classify certain finance receivables as held for sale is based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, contractual duration, type of collateral, credit strength of the borrowers, interest rates and perceived marketability of the receivables. On an ongoing basis,
these factors, combined with our overall liquidation strategy, determine which finance receivables we have the intent to hold for the foreseeable future and which finance receivables we will hold for sale. Our current strategy is based on an evaluation of both our performance and liquidity position and changes in external factors affecting the value and/or marketability of our finance receivables. A change in this strategy could result in a change in the classification of our finance receivables.
Finance receivables held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. At the time of transfer to the held for sale classification, we establish a valuation allowance for any shortfall between the carrying value and fair value. In addition, any allowance for loan losses previously allocated to these finance receivables is transferred to the valuation allowance account, which is netted with finance receivables held for sale on the balance sheet. This valuation allowance is adjusted quarterly. Fair value changes can occur based on market interest rates, market liquidity, and changes in the credit quality of the borrower and value of underlying loan collateral. If we determine that finance receivables classified as held for sale will not be sold and we have the intent and ability to hold the finance receivables for the foreseeable future, until maturity or payoff, the finance receivables are transferred to the held for investment classification at the lower of cost or fair value.
Finance Receivables Held for Investment and Allowance for Losses
Finance receivables are classified as held for investment when we have the intent and the ability to hold the receivable for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. Finance receivables held for investment are generally recorded at the amount of outstanding principal less allowance for losses.
We maintain the allowance for losses on finance receivables held for investment at a level considered adequate to cover inherent losses in the portfolio based on management’s evaluation and analysis by product line. For larger balance accounts specifically identified as impaired, including large accounts in homogeneous portfolios, a reserve is established based on comparing the carrying value with either a) the expected future cash flows, discounted at the finance receivable’s effective interest rate; or b) the fair value of the underlying collateral, if the finance receivable is collateral dependent. The expected future cash flows consider collateral value; financial performance and liquidity of our borrower; existence and financial strength of guarantors; estimated recovery costs, including legal expenses; and costs associated with the repossession/foreclosure and eventual disposal of collateral. When there is a range of potential outcomes, we perform multiple discounted cash flow analyses and weight the outcomes based on management’s estimate of their relative likelihood of occurrence.
The evaluation of our portfolios is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates, including the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired finance receivables and the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, which may differ from actual results. While our analysis is specific to each individual account, critical factors included in this analysis vary by product line and include the following:
• |
Aviation—industry valuation guides, physical condition of the aircraft, payment history, and existence and financial strength of guarantors. |
• |
Golf Equipment—age and condition of the collateral. |
• |
Timeshare—historical performance of consumer notes receivable collateral, real estate valuations, operating expenses of the borrower, the impact of bankruptcy court rulings on the value of the collateral, legal and other professional expenses and borrower’s access to capital. |
We also establish an allowance for losses by product line to cover probable but specifically unknown losses existing in the portfolio. For homogeneous portfolios, including Aviation and Golf Equipment, the allowance is established as a percentage of non-recourse finance receivables, which have not been identified as requiring specific reserves. The percentage is based on a combination of factors, including historical loss experience, current delinquency and default trends, collateral values and both general economic and specific industry trends. For non-homogeneous portfolios, such as Timeshare, the allowance is established as a percentage of watchlist balances, as defined on page 58, which represents a combination of assumed default likelihood and loss severity based on historical experience, industry trends and collateral values. In estimating our allowance for losses to cover accounts not specifically identified, critical factors vary by product line and include the following:
• |
Aviation—the collateral value of the portfolio, historical default experience and delinquency trends. |
• |
Golf Equipment—historical loss experience and delinquency trends. |
• |
Timeshare—individual loan credit quality indicators such as borrowing base shortfalls for revolving notes receivable facilities, default rates of our notes receivable collateral, borrower’s access to capital, historical progression from watchlist to nonaccrual status and estimates of loss severity based on analysis of impaired loans in the product line. |
Finance receivables held for investment are written down to the fair value (less estimated costs to sell) of the related collateral when the collateral is repossessed, and are charged off when the remaining balance is deemed to be uncollectable.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. We value our inventories generally using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method or the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for certain qualifying inventories where LIFO provides a better matching of costs and revenues. We determine costs for our commercial helicopters on an average cost basis by model considering the expended and estimated costs for the current production release. Inventoried costs related to long-term contracts are stated at actual production costs, including allocable operating overhead, advances to suppliers, and, in the case of contracts with the U.S. Government, allocable research and development and general and administrative expenses. Since our inventoried costs include amounts related to contracts with long production cycles, a portion of these costs is not expected to be realized within one year. Pursuant to contract provisions, agencies of the U.S. Government have title to, or security interest in, inventories related to such contracts as a result of advances, performance-based payments and progress payments. Such advances and payments are reflected as an offset against the related inventory balances. Customer deposits are recorded against inventory when the right of offset exists. All other customer deposits are recorded in accrued liabilities.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated primarily using the straight-line method. We capitalize expenditures for improvements that increase asset values and extend useful lives.
Intangible and Other Long-Lived Assets
At acquisition, we estimate and record the fair value of purchased intangible assets primarily using a discounted cash flow analysis of anticipated cash flows reflecting incremental revenues and/or cost savings resulting from the acquired intangible asset using market participant assumptions. Amortization of intangible assets with finite lives is recognized over their estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise realized. Approximately 36% of our gross intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method, with the remaining assets, primarily customer agreements, amortized based on the cash flow streams used to value the asset.
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of the asset held for use exceeds the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows, the carrying value of the asset generally is written down to fair value. Long-lived assets held for sale are stated at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value is determined using pertinent market information, including estimated future discounted cash flows.
Goodwill
We evaluate the recoverability of goodwill annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances, such as declines in sales, earnings or cash flows, or material adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit might be impaired. The reporting unit represents the operating segment unless discrete financial information is prepared and reviewed by segment management for businesses one level below that operating segment, in which case such component is the reporting unit. In certain instances, we have aggregated components of an operating segment into a single reporting unit based on similar economic characteristics.
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued guidance that permits companies to perform a qualitative assessment based on economic, industry and company-specific factors as the initial step in the annual goodwill impairment test for all or selected reporting units. Based on the results of the qualitative assessment, companies are only required to perform Step 1 of the annual impairment test for a reporting unit if the company concludes that it is more likely than not that the unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. As permitted, we adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of 2011 to reduce the costs associated with determining each reporting unit’s fair value for the units where it is more likely than not that the fair value exceeds its carrying amount. For the reporting units for which we did not elect to perform a qualitative assessment, we calculated fair value of each reporting unit primarily using discounted cash flows that incorporate assumptions for the unit’s short- and long-term revenue growth rates, operating margins and discount rates, which represent our best estimates of current and forecasted market conditions, current cost structure, anticipated net cost reductions, and the implied rate of return that we believe a market participant would require for an investment in a company having similar risks and business characteristics to the reporting unit being assessed. Goodwill is considered to be potentially impaired when the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value.
Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations
We maintain various pension and postretirement plans for our employees globally. These plans include significant pension and postretirement benefit obligations, which are calculated based on actuarial valuations. Key assumptions used in determining these obligations and related expenses include expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates and healthcare cost projections. We evaluate and update these assumptions annually in consultation with third-party actuaries and investment advisors. We also make assumptions regarding employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increases. We recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and postretirement plans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognize changes in the funded status of our defined benefit plans in comprehensive income in the year in which they occur. Actuarial gains and losses that are not immediately recognized as net periodic pension cost are recognized as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income (OCI) and are amortized into net periodic pension cost in future periods.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. To manage the volatility relating to our exposures, we net these exposures on a consolidated basis to take advantage of natural offsets. For the residual portion, we enter into various derivative transactions pursuant to our policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and hedging practices. All derivative instruments are reported at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Designation to support hedge accounting is performed on a specific exposure basis. For financial instruments qualifying as fair value hedges, we record changes in fair value in earnings, offset, in part or in whole, by corresponding changes in the fair value of the underlying exposures being hedged. For cash flow hedges, we record changes in the fair value of derivatives (to the extent they are effective as hedges) in OCI, net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair value of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are recorded in earnings.
Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars. Adjustments from currency rate changes are recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account in shareholders’ equity until the related foreign entity is sold or substantially liquidated. We use foreign currency financing transactions to effectively hedge long-term investments in foreign operations with the same corresponding currency. Foreign currency gains and losses on the hedge of the long-term investments are recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account with the offset recorded as an adjustment to debt.
Product Liabilities
We accrue for product liability claims and related defense costs when a loss is probable and reasonably estimable. Our estimates are generally based on the specifics of each claim or incident and our best estimate of the probable loss using historical experience and considering the insurance coverage and deductibles in effect at the date of the incident.
Environmental Liabilities and Asset Retirement Obligations
Liabilities for environmental matters are recorded on a site-by-site basis when it is probable that an obligation has been incurred and the cost can be reasonably estimated. We estimate our accrued environmental liabilities using currently available facts, existing technology, and presently enacted laws and regulations, all of which are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties. Our environmental liabilities are not discounted and do not take into consideration possible future insurance proceeds or significant amounts from claims against other third parties.
We have incurred asset retirement obligations primarily related to costs to remove and dispose of underground storage tanks and asbestos materials used in insulation, adhesive fillers and floor tiles. There is no legal requirement to remove these items, and there currently is no plan to remodel the related facilities or otherwise cause the impacted items to require disposal. Since these asset retirement obligations are not estimable, there is no related liability recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Warranty and Product Maintenance Contracts
We provide limited warranty and product maintenance programs, including parts and labor, for certain products for periods ranging from one to five years. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under warranty programs and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time product revenues are recognized. Factors that affect this liability include the number of products sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty and product maintenance liabilities periodically and adjust the amounts as necessary. Additionally, we may establish warranty liabilities related to the issuance of aircraft service bulletins for aircraft no longer covered under the limited warranty programs.
Research and Development Costs
Our customer-funded research and development costs are charged directly to the related contracts, which primarily consist of U.S. Government contracts. In accordance with government regulations, we recover a portion of company-funded research and development costs through overhead rate charges on our U.S. Government contracts. Research and development costs that are not reimbursable under a contract with the U.S. Government or another customer are charged to expense as incurred. Company-funded research and development costs were $525 million, $403 million, and $401 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are included in cost of sales.
Income Taxes
Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases, as well as from net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards, and are stated at enacted tax rates in effect for the year taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. Deferred income tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in future years. We evaluate the recoverability of these future tax deductions and credits by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, taxable income in carryback years, available tax planning strategies and estimated future taxable income. We recognize net tax-related interest and penalties for continuing operations in income tax expense.
|
Note 2. Discontinued Operations
In pursuing our business strategies, we have periodically divested certain non-core businesses. For several previously-disposed businesses, we have retained certain assets and liabilities. All residual activity relating to our previously-disposed businesses that meet the appropriate criteria are included in discontinued operations.
In connection with the 2008 sale of the Fluid & Power business unit, we received a six-year note with a face value of $28 million and a five-year note with a face value of $30 million, which were both recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet net of a valuation allowance. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we received full payment of both of these notes plus interest, resulting in a gain of $52 million that was recorded in Other losses (gains), net.
On April 3, 2009, we sold HR Textron, an operating unit previously reported within the Textron Systems segment. In connection with this sale, we recorded an after-tax gain of $8 million and net cash proceeds of approximately $376 million in 2009.
|
Note 3. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment are as follows:
(In millions) | Cessna | Bell |
Textron Systems |
Industrial | Total | |||||||||||||||
Balance at January 3, 2009 |
$ | 322 | $ | 30 | $ | 956 | $ | 390 | $ | 1,698 | ||||||||||
Impairment |
— | — | — | (80 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
— | — | 2 | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
322 | 30 | 958 | 312 | 1,622 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
— | 1 | 16 | 5 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | (12 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
322 | 31 | 974 | 305 | 1,632 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
— | — | — | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 322 | $ | 31 | $ | 974 | $ | 308 | $ | 1,635 |
In 2010, we acquired four companies in the Bell, Textron Systems and Industrial segments for aggregate cost of $57 million and recorded $22 million in goodwill and $14 million in intangible assets. In 2009, we recorded an $80 million impairment charge in the Industrial segment’s Golf & Turf Care reporting unit based on lower forecasted revenues and profits related to the effects of the economic recession.
Our intangible assets are summarized below:
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Weighted- Average Amortization Period (in years) |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Customer agreements and contractual relationships |
15 | $ | 367 | $ | (149 | ) | $ | 218 | $ | 412 | $ | (115 | ) | $ | 297 | |||||||||||||
Patents and technology |
10 | 95 | (59 | ) | 36 | 101 | (53 | ) | 48 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
18 | 36 | (19 | ) | 17 | 35 | (16 | ) | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other |
8 | 22 | (16 | ) | 6 | 22 | (15 | ) | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 520 | $ | (243 | ) | $ | 277 | $ | 570 | $ | (199 | ) | $ | 371 |
In the fourth quarter of 2011, we recorded a $41 million impairment charge to write down $37 million in customer agreements and contractual relationships and $4 million in patents and technology. See Note 9 for more information on this charge.
Amortization expense totaled $51 million, $52 million and $52 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated to be approximately $39 million, $37 million, $35 million, $33 million and $28 million in 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016, respectively.
|
Note 4. Accounts Receivable and Finance Receivables
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable is composed of the following:
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Commercial |
$ 528 | $ | 496 | |||
U.S. Government contracts |
346 | 416 | ||||
874 | 912 | |||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(18) | (20 | ) | |||
$ 856 | $ | 892 |
We have unbillable receivables on U.S. Government contracts that arise when the revenues we have appropriately recognized based on performance cannot be billed yet under terms of the contract. Unbillable receivables within accounts receivable totaled $192 million at December 31, 2011 and $195 million at January 1, 2011.
Finance Receivables
Finance receivables by product line, which includes both finance receivables held for investment and finance receivables held for sale, are presented in the following table by product line:
(In millions) | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Aviation |
$ 1,876 | $ | 2,120 | |||
Golf Equipment |
69 | 212 | ||||
Golf Mortgage |
381 | 876 | ||||
Timeshare |
318 | 894 | ||||
Structured Capital |
208 | 317 | ||||
Other liquidating |
43 | 207 | ||||
Total finance receivables |
2,895 | 4,626 | ||||
Less: Allowance for losses |
156 | 342 | ||||
Less: Finance receivables held for sale |
418 | 413 | ||||
Total finance receivables held for investment, net |
$ 2,321 | $ | 3,871 |
Aviation primarily includes installment contracts and finance leases provided to purchasers of new and used Cessna aircraft and Bell helicopters and also includes installment contracts and finance leases secured by used aircraft produced by other manufacturers. These agreements typically have initial terms ranging from five to ten years and amortization terms ranging from eight to fifteen years. The average balance of installment contracts and finance leases in Aviation was $1 million at December 31, 2011. Installment contracts generally require the customer to pay a significant down payment, along with periodic scheduled principal payments that reduce the outstanding balance through the term of the loan. Finance leases with no significant residual value at the end of the contractual term are classified as installment contracts, as their legal and economic substance is more equivalent to a secured borrowing than a finance lease with a significant residual value. Golf Equipment primarily includes finance leases provided to purchasers of new E-Z-GO and Jacobsen golf and turf-care equipment.
Golf Mortgage primarily includes golf course mortgages and also includes mortgages secured by hotels and marinas. Mortgages in this product line are secured by real property and are generally limited to 75% or less of the property’s appraised market value at loan origination. These mortgages typically have initial terms ranging from five to ten years with amortization periods from 20 to 30 years. As of December 31, 2011, loans in Golf Mortgage have an average balance of $6 million and a weighted-average contractual maturity of three years. All loans in this portfolio have been classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2011.
Timeshare includes pools of timeshare interval resort notes receivable and revolving loans that are secured by pools of timeshare interval resort notes receivable. The timeshare interval notes receivable typically have terms of 10 to 20 years. Timeshare also includes construction/inventory mortgages secured by timeshare interval inventory, by real property and, in many instances, by the personal guarantee of the principals. Construction/inventory mortgages are typically cross-collateralized with revolving notes receivable loans to the same borrower; loans in this portfolio typically have initial revolving terms of one to three years and final maturity terms of an additional one to five years. Structured Capital primarily includes leveraged leases secured by the ownership of the leased equipment and real property.
Our finance receivables are diversified across geographic region, borrower industry and type of collateral. At December 31, 2011, 54% of our finance receivables were distributed throughout the U.S. compared with 67% at the end of 2010. Finance receivables held for investment are composed of the following types of financing vehicles:
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Installment contracts |
$ 1,816 | $ | 2,130 | |||
Revolving loans |
216 | 501 | ||||
Leveraged leases |
208 | 279 | ||||
Finance leases |
123 | 262 | ||||
Mortgage loans |
60 | 859 | ||||
Distribution finance receivables |
54 | 182 | ||||
$ 2,477 | $ | 4,213 |
At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, these finance receivables included approximately $559 million and $635 million, respectively, of receivables that have been legally sold to special purpose entities (SPE), which are consolidated subsidiaries of TFC. The assets of the SPEs are pledged as collateral for their debt, which is reflected as securitized on-balance sheet debt in Note 8. Third-party investors have no legal recourse to TFC beyond the credit enhancement provided by the assets of the SPEs.
We received total proceeds of $476 million and $655 million from the sale of finance receivables in 2011 and 2010, respectively, resulting in total gains of $4 million and $31 million, respectively.
Credit Quality Indicators and Nonaccrual Finance Receivables
We internally assess the quality of our finance receivables held for investment portfolio based on a number of key credit quality indicators and statistics such as delinquency, loan balance to estimated collateral value, the liquidity position of individual borrowers and guarantors and default rates of our notes receivable collateral in the Timeshare product line. For Golf Mortgage, we also utilized debt service coverage prior to the transfer discussed below. Because many of these indicators are difficult to apply across an entire class of receivables, we evaluate individual loans on a quarterly basis and classify these loans into three categories based on the key credit quality indicators for the individual loan. These three categories are performing, watchlist and nonaccrual.
We classify finance receivables held for investment as nonaccrual if credit quality indicators suggest full collection is doubtful. In addition, we automatically classify accounts as nonaccrual that are contractually delinquent by more than three months unless collection is not doubtful. Cash payments on nonaccrual accounts, including finance charges, generally are applied to reduce the net investment balance. We resume the accrual of interest when the loan becomes contractually current through payment according to the original terms of the loan or, if a loan has been modified, following a period of performance under the terms of the modification, provided we conclude that collection of all principal and interest is no longer doubtful. Previously suspended interest income is recognized at that time.
Accounts are classified as watchlist when credit quality indicators have deteriorated as compared with typical underwriting criteria, and we believe collection of full principal and interest is probable but not certain. All other finance receivables held for investment that do not meet the watchlist or nonaccrual categories are classified as performing.
A summary of finance receivables held for investment categorized based on the credit quality indicators discussed above is as follows:
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Performing | Watchlist | Nonaccrual | Total | Performing | Watchlist | Nonaccrual | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 1,537 | $ | 214 | $ | 125 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 1,713 | $ | 238 | $ | 169 | $ | 2,120 | ||||||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
21 | 37 | 11 | 69 | 138 | 51 | 23 | 212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
89 | 25 | 167 | 281 | 222 | 77 | 382 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structured Capital |
203 | 5 | — | 208 | 290 | 27 | — | 317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | 163 | 303 | 219 | 685 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
25 | — | 18 | 43 | 130 | 11 | 57 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,875 | $ | 281 | $ | 321 | $ | 2,477 | $ | 2,656 | $ | 707 | $ | 850 | $ | 4,213 | ||||||||||||||||
% of Total |
75.7 | % | 11.3 | % | 13.0 | % | 63.0 | % | 16.8 | % | 20.2 | % |
Nonaccrual finance receivables decreased $529 million in 2011, primarily due to the transfer of the remaining Golf Mortgage portfolio to the held for sale classification and a $215 million reduction in Timeshare, largely due to the resolution of several significant accounts and cash collections on several other accounts. These factors were also the primary reason for the improvement in contractual delinquencies reported below.
We measure delinquency based on the contractual payment terms of our loans and leases. In determining the delinquency aging category of an account, any/all principal and interest received is applied to the most past-due principal and/or interest amounts due. If a significant portion of the contractually due payment is delinquent, the entire finance receivable balance is reported in accordance with the most past-due delinquency aging category.
Finance receivables held for investment by delinquency aging category is summarized in the table below:
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Less Than 31 Days Past Due |
31-60 Past Due |
61-90 Past Due |
Over 90 Days Past Due |
Total |
Less Than 31 Days Past Due |
31-60 Past Due |
61-90 Past Due |
Over 90 Days Past Due |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 1,705 | $ | 66 | $ | 37 | $ | 68 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 1,964 | $ | 67 | $ | 41 | $ | 48 | $ | 2,120 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
53 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 69 | 171 | 13 | 9 | 19 | 212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
238 | 3 | — | 40 | 281 | 533 | 14 | 6 | 128 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structured Capital |
208 | — | — | — | 208 | 317 | — | — | — | 317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | — | 543 | 12 | 7 | 123 | 685 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
35 | — | — | 8 | 43 | 166 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,239 | $ | 72 | $ | 43 | $ | 123 | $ | 2,477 | $ | 3,694 | $ | 108 | $ | 64 | $ | 347 | $ | 4,213 |
We had no recorded investment in accrual status loans that were greater than 90 days past due in 2011 or in 2010. For the year ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, 60+ days contractual delinquency as a percentage of finance receivables held for investment was 6.70% and 9.77%, respectively.
Impaired Loans
We evaluate individual finance receivables held for investment in non-homogeneous portfolios and larger accounts in homogeneous loan portfolios for impairment on a quarterly basis. Finance receivables classified as held for sale are reflected at the lower of cost or fair value and are excluded from these evaluations. A finance receivable is considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement based on our review of the credit quality indicators discussed above. Impaired finance receivables include both nonaccrual accounts and accounts for which full collection of principal and interest remains probable, but the account’s original terms have been, or are expected to be, significantly modified. If the modification specifies an interest rate equal to or greater than a market rate for a finance receivable with comparable risk, the account is not considered impaired in years subsequent to the modification. There was no significant interest income recognized on impaired loans in either 2011 or 2010.
A summary of impaired finance receivables, excluding leveraged leases, at year end and the average recorded investment for the year is provided below:
Recorded Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance for Credit Losses |
Impaired Loans with Related Allowance for Credit Losses |
Total Impaired Loans |
Unpaid Principal Balance |
Allowance For Losses On Impaired Loans |
Average Recorded Investment |
||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 47 | $ | 92 | $ | 139 | $ | 142 | $ | 39 | $ | 146 | ||||||||||||
Timeshare |
170 | 57 | 227 | 288 | 38 | 315 | ||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | — | 232 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
3 | 12 | 15 | 59 | 9 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 220 | $ | 161 | $ | 381 | $ | 489 | $ | 86 | $ | 723 | ||||||||||||
January 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 17 | $ | 147 | $ | 164 | $ | 165 | $ | 45 | $ | 201 | ||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
— | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
69 | 355 | 424 | 459 | 102 | 426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
138 | 175 | 313 | 324 | 39 | 300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
30 | 16 | 46 | 104 | 3 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 254 | $ | 697 | $ | 951 | $ | 1,057 | $ | 191 | $ | 1,012 |
Loan Modifications
Troubled debt restructurings occur when we have either modified the contract terms of finance receivables held for investment for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties or accepted a transfer of assets in full or partial satisfaction of the loan balance. Modifications often arise in Golf Mortgage and Timeshare as a result of the lack of financing available to borrowers in these industries. Golf Mortgage loans are typically structured with amortization periods between 20 and 30 years and contractual maturities of between 5 and 10 years, resulting in a significant balloon payment. We modify a significant portion of these loans at, or near the maturity date as a result of this structure. The types of modifications we typically make include extensions of the original maturity date of the contract, extensions of revolving borrowing periods, delays in the timing of required principal payments, deferrals of interest payments, advances to protect the value of our collateral and principal reductions contingent on full repayment prior to the maturity date. Finance receivables held for investment that were modified during 2011 and are categorized as troubled debt restructurings, excluding related allowances for loan losses, are summarized below:
Recorded Investment | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Number of Customers |
Pre-Modification | Post- Modification |
At Dec. 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
23 | $ | 203 | $ | 191 | $ | — | |||||||||
Timeshare |
10 | 239 | 199 | 138 |
At December 31, 2011, the recorded investment balance for Golf Mortgage reflects the transfer of finance receivables from held for investment to the held for sale classification. The modifications included above resulted in a reduction in provision for losses of $36 million due to the reversal of allowance for losses related to one significant Timeshare account, partially offset by net portfolio losses of $15 million.
Modified finance receivables are classified as impaired loans and are evaluated on an individual basis to determine whether reserves are required. Our reserve evaluation includes an estimate of the likelihood that the borrower will be able to perform under the contractual terms of the modification. Subsequent payment defaults or delinquency trends of finance receivables modified as troubled debt restructurings are also factored into the evaluation of impaired loans for reserving purposes as a default decreases the likelihood that the borrower will be able to perform under the terms of future modifications. In 2011, we had three customer defaults in Timeshare for finance receivables that had been modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous twelve months; the recorded investment for these customers totaled $113 million, excluding related allowances for doubtful accounts, at the end of 2011.
We may foreclose, repossess or receive collateral when a customer no longer has the ability to make payment. These transfers of assets in full or partial satisfaction of the loan balance are also considered troubled debt restructurings if the fair value of the assets transferred is less than our recorded investment. Similar to the troubled debt restructurings described above, these loans typically have been classified as impaired loans prior to the asset transfer; therefore, reserves have already been established related to the loan. As a result, for 2011, charge-offs of $73 million upon the transfer of such assets were largely offset by previously established reserves.
Troubled debt restructurings resulting in transfers of assets in satisfaction of the loan balance that occurred in 2011 are as follows:
(Dollars in millions) | Number of Customers |
Pre- Modification |
Post- Modification Asset Balance |
|||||||||
Aviation |
27 | $ | 53 | $ | 32 | |||||||
Golf Mortgage |
5 | 59 | 39 | |||||||||
Timeshare |
2 | 96 | 60 |
Allowance for Losses
A rollforward of the allowance for losses on finance receivables held for investment is provided below:
(In millions) | Aviation | Golf Equipment |
Golf Mortgage |
Timeshare | Other Liquidating |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
$ | 114 | $ | 9 | $ | 65 | $ | 79 | $ | 74 | $ | 341 | ||||||||||||
Provision for losses |
37 | 14 | 66 | 38 | (12 | ) | 143 | |||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(44 | ) | (7 | ) | (52 | ) | (7 | ) | (28 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers |
— | — | — | (4 | ) | — | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
107 | 16 | 79 | 106 | 34 | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for losses |
18 | (3 | ) | 25 | (26 | ) | (2 | ) | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(30 | ) | (4 | ) | (24 | ) | (40 | ) | (4 | ) | (102 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers |
— | (3 | ) | (80 | ) | — | (13 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 95 | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | 40 | $ | 15 | $ | 156 |
A summary of the allowance for losses on finance receivables that are evaluated on an individual and on a collective basis is provided below. The finance receivables reported in this table specifically exclude $208 million and $279 million of leveraged leases at December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, in accordance with authoritative accounting standards.
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance Receivables Evaluated | Allowance Based on Individual Evaluation |
Allowance Based on Collective Evaluation |
Finance Receivables Evaluated | Allowance Based on Individual Evaluation |
Allowance Based on Collective Evaluation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Individually | Collectively | Total | Individually | Collectively | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 139 | $ | 1,737 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 39 | $ | 56 | $ | 164 | $ | 1,956 | $ | 2,120 | $ | 45 | $ | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
2 | 67 | 69 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 208 | 212 | 2 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
227 | 54 | 281 | 38 | 2 | 424 | 257 | 681 | 102 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | — | 313 | 372 | 685 | 39 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
15 | 28 | 43 | 9 | 6 | 41 | 195 | 236 | 3 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 383 | $ | 1,886 | $ | 2,269 | $ | 87 | $ | 69 | $ | 946 | $ | 2,988 | $ | 3,934 | $ | 191 | $ | 151 |
Captive and Other Intercompany Financing
Our Finance group provides financing for retail purchases and leases for new and used aircraft and equipment manufactured by our Manufacturing group. The captive finance receivables for these inventory sales that are included in the Finance group’s balance sheets are summarized below:
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Installment contracts |
$ 1,488 | $ | 1,652 | |||
Finance leases |
121 | 220 | ||||
Distribution finance receivables |
8 | 18 | ||||
Total |
$ 1,617 | $ | 1,890 |
In 2011, 2010 and 2009, our Finance group paid our Manufacturing group $284 million, $416 million and $654 million, respectively, related to the sale of Textron-manufactured products to third parties that were financed by the Finance group. Our Cessna and Industrial segments also received proceeds in those years of $2 million, $10 million and $13 million, respectively, from the sale of equipment from their manufacturing operations to our Finance group for use under operating lease agreements. Operating agreements specify that our Finance group has recourse to our Manufacturing group for certain uncollected amounts related to these transactions. At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the amounts guaranteed by the Manufacturing group totaled $88 million and $69 million, respectively. Our Manufacturing group has established reserves for losses on its balance sheet within accrued and other liabilities for the receivables it guarantees.
In 2009, Textron Inc. agreed to lend TFC funds to pay down maturing debt. The interest rate on this borrowing was 5% at December 31, 2011 and 7% at January 1, 2011. As of December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, the outstanding balance due to Textron Inc. for these borrowings was $490 million and $315 million, respectively. These amounts are included in other current assets for the Manufacturing group and other liabilities for the Finance group in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Finance Receivables Held for Sale
At the end of 2011 and 2010, approximately $418 million and $413 million of finance receivables were classified as held for sale. At December 31, 2011, finance receivables held for sale primarily include the entire Golf Mortgage portfolio and a portion of the Timeshare portfolio. On a periodic basis, we evaluate our liquidation strategy for the non-captive finance portfolios as we continue to execute our exit plan. In connection with this evaluation, we also review our definition of the foreseeable future. Due to the relative stability of the golf market through the end of 2011, we believe that the foreseeable future now can be extended to a period of one to two years as opposed to the six- to nine-month period we previously used. Based on this change, in the fourth quarter of 2011, we determined that we no longer had the intent to hold the remaining Golf Mortgage portfolio for investment for the foreseeable future, and, accordingly, transferred $458 million of the remaining Golf Mortgage finance receivables, net of an $80 million allowance for loan losses, from the held for investment classification to the held for sale classification. These finance receivables were recorded at fair value at the time of the transfer, resulting in a $186 million charge recorded to Valuation allowance on transfer of Golf Mortgage portfolio to held for sale. Also, in 2011, we transferred a total of $125 million of Timeshare finance receivables to the held for sale classification, based on an agreement to sell a portion of the portfolio that was sold in the fourth quarter of 2011 and interest in other portions of the portfolio. In 2010, we transferred $219 million of Timeshare finance receivables to the held for sale classification as a result of an unanticipated inquiry we have received to purchase these finance receivables; we determined a sale of these finance receivables would be consistent with our goal to maximize the economic value of our portfolio and accelerate cash collections. We received proceeds of $383 million and $582 million in 2011 and 2010, respectively, from the sale of finance receivables held for sale and $10 million and $86 million, respectively, from collections.
|
Note 5. Inventories
Inventories are composed of the following:
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Finished goods |
$ 1,012 | $ | 784 | |||
Work in process |
2,202 | 2,125 | ||||
Raw materials and components |
399 | 506 | ||||
3,613 | 3,415 | |||||
Progress/milestone payments |
(1,211) | (1,138 | ) | |||
$ 2,402 | $ | 2,277 |
Inventories valued by the LIFO method totaled $1.0 billion and $1.3 billion at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and the carrying values of these inventories would have been approximately $422 million and $441 million, respectively, higher had our LIFO inventories been valued at current costs. Inventories related to long-term contracts, net of progress/milestone payments, were $414 million and $322 million at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
|
Note 6. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
Our Manufacturing group’s property, plant and equipment, net are composed of the following:
(Dollars in millions) |
Useful Lives (in years) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
|||||||
Land and buildings |
4 –40 | $ | 1,502 | $ | 1,453 | |||||
Machinery and equipment |
1 –15 | 3,591 | 3,348 | |||||||
5,093 | 4,801 | |||||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(3,097 | ) | (2,869 | ) | ||||||
$ | 1,996 | $ | 1,932 |
Assets under capital leases totaled $251 million and $248 million and had accumulated amortization of $47 million and $40 million at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Manufacturing group’s depreciation expense, which includes amortization expense on capital leases, totaled $317 million, $308 million and $317 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
Note 7. Accrued Liabilities
The accrued liabilities of our Manufacturing group are summarized below:
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Customer deposits |
$ 729 | $ | 715 | |||
Salaries, wages and employer taxes |
282 | 275 | ||||
Current portion of warranty and product maintenance contracts |
198 | 242 | ||||
Deferred revenues |
169 | 161 | ||||
Retirement plans |
80 | 82 | ||||
Other |
494 | 541 | ||||
Total accrued liabilities |
$ 1,952 | $ | 2,016 |
Changes in our warranty and product maintenance contract liability are as follows:
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Accrual at beginning of year |
$ | 242 | $ | 263 | $ | 278 | ||||||
Provision |
223 | 189 | 174 | |||||||||
Settlements |
(223 | ) | (231 | ) | (217 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments to prior accrual estimates* |
(18 | ) | 21 | 28 | ||||||||
Accrual at end of year |
$ | 224 | $ | 242 | $ | 263 |
* Adjustments include changes to prior year estimates, new issues on prior year sales and currency translation adjustments.
|
Note 8. Debt and Credit Facilities
Our debt and credit facilities are summarized below:
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||||
Manufacturing group |
||||||||
Long-term senior debt: |
||||||||
Medium-term notes due 2011 (weighted-average rate of 9.83%) |
$ | — | $ | 13 | ||||
6.50% due 2012 |
139 | 154 | ||||||
3.875% due 2013 |
308 | 315 | ||||||
4.50% convertible senior notes due 2013 |
195 | 504 | ||||||
6.20% due 2015 |
350 | 350 | ||||||
4.625% due 2016 |
250 | — | ||||||
5.60% due 2017 |
350 | 350 | ||||||
7.25% due 2019 |
250 | 250 | ||||||
6.625% due 2020 |
231 | 231 | ||||||
5.95% due 2021 |
250 | — | ||||||
Other (weighted-average rate of 3.72% and 3.12%, respectively) |
136 | 135 | ||||||
2,459 | 2,302 | |||||||
Less: Current portion of long-term debt |
(146 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
2,313 | 2,283 | ||||||
Total Manufacturing group debt |
$ | 2,459 | $ | 2,302 | ||||
Finance group |
||||||||
Medium-term fixed-rate and variable-rate notes*: |
||||||||
Due 2011 (weighted-average rate of 3.07%) |
$ | — | $ | 374 | ||||
Due 2012 (weighted-average rate of 4.43% and 4.43%, respectively) |
52 | 52 | ||||||
Due 2013 (weighted-average rate of 4.50% and 4.46%, respectively) |
553 | 553 | ||||||
Due 2014 (weighted-average rate of 5.07% and 5.07%, respectively) |
111 | 111 | ||||||
Due 2015 (weighted-average rate of 2.50% and 3.59%, respectively) |
37 | 14 | ||||||
Due 2016 (weighted-average rate of 1.94% and 4.59%, respectively |
43 | 10 | ||||||
Due 2017 and thereafter (weighted-average rate of 2.86% and 3.31%, respectively) |
387 | 242 | ||||||
Credit line borrowings due 2012 (weighted-average rate 0.91%) |
— | 1,440 | ||||||
Securitized debt (weighted-average rate of 2.08% and 2.01%, respectively) |
469 | 530 | ||||||
6% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes |
300 | 300 | ||||||
Fair value adjustments and unamortized discount |
22 | 34 | ||||||
Total Finance group debt |
$ | 1,974 | $ | 3,660 |
* Variable-rate notes totaled approximately $100 million and $271 million at December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively.
In 2011, Textron Inc. entered into a senior unsecured revolving credit facility that expires in March 2015 for an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion, up to $200 million of which is available for the issuance of letters of credit. At December 31, 2011, there were no amounts borrowed against the facility, and there were $38 million of letters of credits issued against it. In October 2011, the Finance group repaid the outstanding balance on its credit facility and elected to terminate the facility.
The following table shows required payments during the next five years on debt outstanding at December 31, 2011:
(In millions) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
$ | 146 | $ | 532 | $ | 6 | $ | 356 | $ | 256 | ||||||||||
Finance group |
196 | 693 | 232 | 169 | 105 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 342 | $ | 1,225 | $ | 238 | $ | 525 | $ | 361 |
Convertible Senior Notes and Related Transactions
On May 5, 2009, we issued $600 million of convertible senior notes with a maturity date of May 1, 2013 and interest payable semiannually. The convertible notes are accounted for in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, which require us to separately account for the liability (debt) and the equity (conversion option) components of the convertible notes in a manner that reflected our non-convertible debt borrowing rate at time of issuance. Accordingly, we recorded a debt discount and corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital of $134 million at the issuance date. We are amortizing the debt discount utilizing the effective interest method over the life of the notes, which increases the effective interest rate of the convertible notes from its coupon rate of 4.50% to 11.72%.
These notes are convertible at the holder’s option, under certain circumstances, into shares of our common stock at an initial conversion rate of 76.1905 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of convertible notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $13.125 per share. Upon conversion, we have the right to settle the conversion of each $1,000 principal amount of convertible notes with any of the three following alternatives: (1) cash, (2) shares of our common stock or (3) a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. These notes are convertible only under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter when the last reported sale price of our common stock for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter is more than 130% of the applicable conversion price per share of common stock on the last trading day of such preceding calendar quarter, (2) during the five-business-day period after any 10 consecutive trading day measurement period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of convertible notes for each day in the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the applicable conversion rate, (3) if specified distributions to holders of our common stock are made or specified corporate transactions occur or (4) at any time on or after February 19, 2013.
In September 2011, we announced a cash tender offer for any and all of the outstanding convertible notes. In accordance with the terms of the tender offer, for each $1,000 principal amount of the convertible notes tendered, we paid the holder $1,524 plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the October 13, 2011 settlement date. In the aggregate, the holders validly tendered $225 million principal amount, or 37.5%, of the convertible notes. Subsequent to the tender offer, we also purchased $151 million principal amount of the convertible notes in a small number of privately negotiated transactions and retired another $8 million related to a holder-initiated conversion in the fourth quarter of 2011. By the end of 2011, we had paid approximately $580 million in cash related to these transactions and had reduced the principal amount of the convertible notes by 64%. In accordance with the applicable authoritative accounting guidance, we determined the fair value of the liability component of the convertible notes purchased in the tender offer and subsequent transactions to be $398 million, with the balance of $182 million representing the equity component. The carrying value of these convertible notes, including unamortized issuance costs, was $343 million, which resulted in a pretax loss of $55 million that was recorded in Other losses (gains), net in the fourth quarter of 2011, along with a $182 million reduction to shareholders’ equity.
We incurred cash and non-cash interest expense of $58 million in 2011 and $60 million in 2010 for these notes. At the end of 2011 and 2010, the face value of the notes totaled $216 million and $600 million, respectively, and the unamortized discount totaled $21 million and $96 million, respectively.
Based on a December 31, 2011 stock price of $18.49, the “if converted value” exceeded the face amount of the notes by $88 million; however, after giving effect to the exercise of the call options and warrants described below, the incremental cash or share settlement in excess of the face amount would result in either a cash payment of $45 million, a 2.4 million net share issuance, or a combination of cash and stock, at our option. Our common stock price exceeded the conversion threshold price of $17.06 per share for at least 20 trading days during the 30 consecutive trading days ended December 31, 2011. Accordingly, the notes are convertible at the holder’s option through March 31, 2012. We may deliver cash, shares of common stock or a combination of cash and shares of common stock in satisfaction of our obligations upon conversion of the convertible notes. We intend to settle the face value of the convertible notes in cash. We have continued to classify these convertible notes as long term based on our intent and ability to maintain the debt outstanding for at least one year through the use of various funding sources available to us.
Call Option and Warrant Transactions
Concurrently with the pricing of the convertible notes in May 2009, we entered into transactions with two counterparties, including an underwriter and an affiliate of an underwriter of the convertible notes, pursuant to which we purchased from the counterparties call options to acquire our common stock and sold to the counterparties warrants to purchase our common stock. We entered into these transactions for the purposes of reducing the cash outflow and/or the potential dilutive effect to our shareholders upon the conversion of the convertible notes.
On October 25, 2011, we entered into separate agreements with each of the counterparties to the call option and warrant transactions to adjust the number of shares of common stock covered by these instruments to reflect the results of the tender offer. Accordingly, we reduced the number of common shares covered under the call options from 45.7 million shares to 28.6 million
shares. In addition, the warrants were amended to reduce the number of shares covered by the warrants to 28.0 million and to change the expiration dates specified in the original agreement to correspond with the final settlement period for the call options. Pursuant to these amendments, we received $135 million for the call option transaction and paid $133 million for the warrant transaction, and the net amount was recorded within shareholders’ equity. Subsequently, due to the additional repurchase of convertible notes, we entered into separate agreements with each of the counterparties to further reduce the number of shares of common stock covered by these instruments. Accordingly, we reduced the number of common shares covered under the call options from 28.6 million shares to 16.5 million shares and reduced the number of shares covered by the warrants from 28.0 million shares to 16.5 million shares. The net value of $20 million related to these amendments was used to increase our capped call position as discussed further below. In the aggregate, the reductions in the number of shares subject to the call options and warrants equated to the number of shares of common stock into which the $384 million principal amount of all the notes repurchased in the fourth quarter of 2011 would have been convertible.
At the end of 2011, the outstanding purchased call options give us the right to acquire from the counterparties 16.5 million shares of our common stock (the number of shares into which all of the remaining notes are convertible) at an exercise price of $13.125 per share (the same as the initial conversion price of the notes), subject to adjustments that mirror the terms of the convertible notes. The call options will terminate at the earlier of the maturity date of the related convertible notes or the last day on which any of the related notes remain outstanding. The warrants give the counterparties the right to acquire, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, an aggregate of 16.5 million shares of common stock at an exercise price of $15.75 per share. We may settle these transactions in cash, shares or a combination of cash and shares, at our option. When evaluated in aggregate, the call options and warrants have the effect of increasing the effective conversion price of the convertible notes from $13.125 to $15.75. Accordingly, we will not incur the cash outflow or the dilution that would be experienced due to the increase of the share price from $13.125 per share to $15.75 per share because we are entitled to receive from the counterparties the difference between our sale to the counterparties of 16.5 million shares at $15.75 per share and our purchase of shares from the counterparties at $13.125 per share.
Based on the structure of the call options and warrants, these contracts meet all of the applicable accounting criteria for equity classification under the applicable accounting standards and, as such, are classified in shareholders’ equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, since these contracts are classified in shareholders’ equity and indexed to our common stock, they are not accounted for as derivatives, and, accordingly, we do not recognize changes in their fair value.
Capped Call Transactions
On October 25, 2011, we entered into capped call transactions with the counterparties for a cost of $32 million, which covered 17.1 million shares of our common stock. We subsequently amended the capped call transactions to cover an additional 11.5 million shares of our common stock in lieu of $20 million we would have received from the counterparties related to the amendment of the option and warrant transactions discussed above. At December 31, 2011, the capped calls covered an aggregate of 28.6 million shares of our common stock (the number of shares into which all of the repurchased notes would have been convertible). We purchased the capped calls in order retain the potential value of the original call option and warrant transactions which we would otherwise have given up upon the downsizing of those instruments. The capped calls have a strike price of $13.125 per share and a cap price of $15.75 per share, which entitles us to receive at the May 2013 expiration date the per share value of our stock price in excess of $13.125 up to a maximum stock price of $15.75. If the market price of our common stock at the expiration date is less than $13.125, the capped call will expire with no value. The maximum value of the capped calls, in the event that our stock price is at least $15.75 at the expiration date, is approximately $75 million. We may elect for the settlement of the capped call transactions, if any, to be paid to us in shares of our common stock or cash or in a combination of cash and shares of common stock. Based on the structure of the capped call, the transactions meet all of the applicable accounting criteria for equity classification and will be classified within shareholders’ equity.
6% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes
The Finance group’s $300 million of 6% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes are unsecured and rank junior to all of its existing and future senior debt. The notes mature on February 15, 2067; however, we have the right to redeem the notes at par on or after February 15, 2017 and are obligated to redeem the notes beginning on February 15, 2042. The Finance group has agreed in a replacement capital covenant that it will not redeem the notes on or before February 15, 2047 unless it receives a capital contribution from the Manufacturing group and/or net proceeds from the sale of certain replacement capital securities at specified amounts. Interest on the notes is fixed at 6% until February 15, 2017 and floats at the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate + 1.735% thereafter.
Support Agreement
Under a Support Agreement, Textron Inc. is required to ensure that TFC maintains fixed charge coverage of no less than 125% and consolidated shareholder’s equity of no less than $200 million. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, cash payments of $182 million, $383 million and $270 million, respectively, were paid to TFC to maintain compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio. In addition, we paid $240 million on January 17, 2012.
|
Note 9. Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
We measure fair value at the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We prioritize the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability into a three-tier fair value hierarchy. This fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exist, requiring companies to develop their own assumptions. Observable inputs that do not meet the criteria of Level 1, and include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active are categorized as Level 2. Level 3 inputs are those that reflect our estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Valuation techniques for assets and liabilities measured using Level 3 inputs may include methodologies such as the market approach, the income approach or the cost approach and may use unobservable inputs such as projections, estimates and management’s interpretation of current market data. These unobservable inputs are utilized only to the extent that observable inputs are not available or cost-effective to obtain.
Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The assets and liabilities that are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis consist primarily of our derivative financial instruments, which are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value amounts of these instruments that are designated as hedging instruments are provided below:
Asset (Liability) | ||||||||||||
(In millions) | Borrowing Group | Balance Sheet Location |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Interest rate exchange contracts* |
Finance | Other assets | $ 22 | $ | 34 | |||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
Manufacturing | Other current assets | 9 | 39 | ||||||||
Total |
$ 31 | $ | 73 | |||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Interest rate exchange contracts* |
Finance | Other liabilities | $ (7) | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
Manufacturing | Accrued liabilities | (5) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Total |
$ (12) | $ | (8 | ) |
* Interest rate exchange contracts represent fair value hedges.
The Finance group’s interest rate exchange contracts are not exchange traded and are measured at fair value utilizing widely accepted, third-party developed valuation models. The actual terms of each individual contract are entered into a valuation model, along with interest rate and foreign exchange rate data, which is based on readily observable market data published by third-party leading financial news and data providers. Credit risk is factored into the fair value of these assets and liabilities based on the differential between both our credit default swap spread for liabilities and the counterparty’s credit default swap spread for assets as compared with a standard AA-rated counterparty; however, this had no significant impact on the valuation at December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, we had interest rate exchange contracts with notional amounts upon which the contracts were based of $0.8 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively.
Foreign currency exchange contracts are measured at fair value using the market method valuation technique. The inputs to this technique utilize current foreign currency exchange forward market rates published by third-party leading financial news and data providers. These are observable data that represent the rates that the financial institution uses for contracts entered into at that date; however, they are not based on actual transactions so they are classified as Level 2. At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, we had foreign currency exchange contracts with notional amounts upon which the contracts were based of $645 million and $635 million, respectively.
The Finance group also has investments in other marketable securities totaling $21 million and $51 million at December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, which are classified as available for sale. These investments are classified as Level 2 as the fair value for these notes was determined based on observable market inputs for similar securitization interests in markets that are relatively inactive compared with the market environment in which they were originally issued.
Fair Value Hedges
Our Finance group enters into interest rate exchange contracts to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of its fixed-rate receivables and debt due to fluctuations in interest rates. By using these contracts, we are able to convert our fixed-rate cash flows to floating-rate cash flows. The amount of ineffectiveness on our fair value hedges and the gain (loss) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were both insignificant in 2011 and 2010.
Cash Flow Hedges
We manufacture and sell our products in a number of countries throughout the world, and, therefore, we are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The primary purpose of our foreign currency hedging activities is to manage the volatility associated with foreign currency purchases of materials, foreign currency sales of products, and other assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. We primarily utilize forward exchange contracts and purchased options with maturities of no more than three years that qualify as cash flow hedges and are intended to offset the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted sales, inventory purchases and overhead expenses. At December 31, 2011, we had a net deferred gain of $8 million in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these cash flow hedges. Net gains and losses recognized in earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive loss on these cash flow hedges, including gains and losses related to hedge ineffectiveness, were not material in 2011 and 2010. We do not expect the amount of gains and losses in Accumulated other comprehensive loss that will be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months to be material.
We hedge our net investment position in major currencies and generate foreign currency interest payments that offset other transactional exposures in these currencies. To accomplish this, we borrow directly in foreign currency and designate a portion of foreign currency debt as a hedge of net investments. We also may utilize currency forwards as hedges of our related foreign net investments. We record changes in the fair value of these contracts in other comprehensive income to the extent they are effective as cash flow hedges. If a contract does not qualify for hedge accounting or is designated as a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the contract are recorded in earnings. Currency effects on the effective portion of these hedges, which are reflected in the foreign currency translation adjustment account within OCI, produced a $4 million after-tax gain in 2011, resulting in an accumulated net gain balance of $18 million at December 31, 2011. The ineffective portion of these hedges was insignificant.
Counterparty Credit Risk
Our exposure to loss from nonperformance by the counterparties to our derivative agreements at the end of 2011 is minimal. We do not anticipate nonperformance by counterparties in the periodic settlements of amounts due. We historically have minimized this potential for risk by entering into contracts exclusively with major, financially sound counterparties having no less than a long-term bond rating of A. The credit risk generally is limited to the amount by which the counterparties’ contractual obligations exceed our obligations to the counterparty. We continuously monitor our exposures to ensure that we limit our risks.
Assets Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
The table below presents those assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis that had fair value measurement adjustments during 2011 and 2010. These assets were measured using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) and include the following:
Balance at | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Finance group |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired finance receivables |
$ | 81 | $ | 504 | $ | (82 | ) | $ | (148 | ) | ||||||
Finance receivables held for sale |
418 | 413 | (206 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets |
128 | 149 | (49 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
15 | — | (41 | ) | — |
Impaired Finance Receivables — Impaired nonaccrual finance receivables are included in the table above since the measurement of required reserves on our impaired finance receivables is significantly dependent on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Fair values of collateral are determined based on the use of appraisals, industry pricing guides, input from market participants, our recent experience selling similar assets or internally developed discounted cash flow models. Fair value measurements recorded on impaired finance receivables resulted in charges to provision for loan losses and primarily were related to initial fair value adjustments.
Finance Receivables Held for Sale — Finance receivables held for sale are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during periods in which the fair value is lower than the cost value. As a result of our plan to exit the non-captive finance business certain finance receivables are classified as held for sale. At December 31, 2011, the finance receivables held for sale include the entire Golf Mortgage portfolio, the majority of which was transferred to the finance receivables held for sale classification in the fourth quarter of 2011, and a portion of the Timeshare portfolio. Due to the transfer, these finance receivables were recorded at fair value, resulting in a $186 million charge recorded to Valuation allowance on transfer of Golf Mortgage portfolio to held for sale.
There are no active, quoted market prices for our finance receivables. The estimate of fair value was determined based on the use of discounted cash flow models to estimate the exit price we expect to receive in the principal market for each type of loan in an orderly transaction, which includes both the sale of pools of similar assets and the sale of individual loans. The models we used incorporate estimates of the rate of return, financing cost, capital structure and/or discount rate expectations of current market participants combined with estimated loan cash flows based on credit losses, payment rates and credit line utilization rates. Where available, assumptions related to the expectations of current market participants are compared with observable market inputs, including bids from prospective purchasers of similar loans and certain bond market indices for loans perceived to be of similar credit quality. Although we utilize and prioritize these market observable inputs in our discounted cash flow models, these inputs are not typically derived from markets with directly comparable loan structures, industries and collateral types. Therefore, all valuations of finance receivables held for sale involve significant management judgment, which can result in differences between our fair value estimates and those of other market participants.
Other assets — Other assets include repossessed assets and properties, operating assets received in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables and other investments, which are accounted for under the equity method of accounting and have no active, quoted market prices. The fair value of these assets is determined based on the use of appraisals, industry pricing guides, input from market participants, our recent experience selling similar assets or internally developed discounted cash flow models. For our other investments, the discounted cash flow models incorporate assumptions specific to the nature of the investments’ business and underlying assets and include industry valuation benchmarks such as discount rates, capitalization rates and cash flow multiples.
Intangible assets — In the fourth quarter of 2011, we determined that we had an indicator of potential asset impairment in our Textron Systems segment. As Textron Systems sells many of its products to the U.S. Government, its business environment continues to be shaped by policy and budget decisions determined by the U.S. Government. Recent actions of the President and Congress indicate an ongoing emphasis on federal budget deficit reduction, and budget decisions by the President and Congress may considerably reduce discretionary spending, of which defense constitutes a significant share. Based on the continued deterioration of this environment, the results of our annual operating plan review, which included updated long-range forecast estimates, and the loss of certain contracts, we determined that an indicator of potential asset impairment existed in the fourth quarter, requiring us to perform impairment tests. Based on our analysis, we determined that certain intangible assets were impaired and recorded a $41 million pre-tax impairment charge to write down intangible assets primarily related to customer agreements and contractual relationships associated with AAI-Logistics & Technical Services and AAI-Test & Training businesses. We determined the fair value of these assets using discounted cash flows related to each asset group and a weighted-average cost of capital of approximately 10%. The impairment charge is recorded in cost of sales within segment profit.
Assets and Liabilities Not Recorded at Fair Value
The carrying value and estimated fair values of our financial instruments that are not reflected in the financial statements at fair value are as follows:
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, excluding leases |
$ | (2,328 | ) | $ | (2,561 | ) | $ | (2,172 | ) | $ | (2,698 | ) | ||||
Finance group |
||||||||||||||||
Finance receivables held for investment, excluding leases |
1,997 | 1,848 | 3,345 | 3,131 | ||||||||||||
Debt |
(1,974 | ) | (1,854 | ) | (3,660 | ) | (3,528 | ) |
Fair value for the Manufacturing group debt is determined using market observable data for similar transactions. At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, approximately 53% and 33%, respectively, of the fair value of term debt for the Finance group was determined based on observable market transactions. The remaining Finance group debt was determined based on discounted cash flow analyses using observable market inputs from debt with similar duration, subordination and credit default expectations. We utilize the same valuation methodologies to determine the fair value estimates for finance receivables held for investment as used for finance receivables held for sale.
|
Note 11. Special Charges
There were no amounts recorded within special charges in 2011. In 2010 and 2009, special charges included restructuring charges related to a global restructuring program that totaled $99 million and $237 million, respectively. In the fourth quarter of 2008, we initiated a restructuring program to reduce overhead costs and improve productivity across the company and announced the exit of portions of our commercial finance business. This restructuring program primarily included corporate and segment direct and indirect workforce reductions and the closure and consolidation of certain operations. With the completion of this program at the end of 2010, we terminated approximately 12,100 positions worldwide representing approximately 28% of our global workforce since the inception of the program and exited 30 leased and owned facilities and plants at a total program cost of $400 million. We record restructuring costs in special charges as these costs are generally of a nonrecurring nature and are not included in segment profit, which is our measure used for evaluating performance and for decision-making purposes.
In the third quarter of 2010, we substantially liquidated the assets held by a Canadian entity within the Finance segment. Accordingly, we recorded a non-cash charge of $91 million ($74 million after-tax) within special charges to reclassify the entity’s cumulative currency translation adjustment amount within other comprehensive income to the Statement of Operations. The reclassification of this amount had no impact on shareholders’ equity.
In the fourth quarter of 2009, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $80 million in connection with our annual goodwill impairment test for the Golf and Turf Care reporting unit, which is part of our Industrial segment.
Special charges by segment for 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
Restructuring Program | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Severance Costs |
Curtailment Charges, Net |
Asset Impairments |
Contract Terminations |
Total Restructuring |
Other Charges |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 34 | $ | — | $ | 6 | $ | 3 | $ | 43 | $ | — | $ | 43 | ||||||||||||||
Finance |
7 | — | 1 | 3 | 11 | 91 | 102 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
1 | — | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
5 | — | 9 | 1 | 15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bell |
10 | — | — | — | 10 | — | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
19 | — | — | — | 19 | — | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 76 | $ | — | $ | 16 | $ | 7 | $ | 99 | $ | 91 | $ | 190 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 80 | $ | 26 | $ | 54 | $ | 7 | $ | 167 | $ | — | $ | 167 | ||||||||||||||
Finance |
11 | 1 | — | 1 | 13 | — | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
34 | — | — | 1 | 35 | — | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
6 | (4 | ) | — | 3 | 5 | 80 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bell |
9 | — | — | — | 9 | — | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
5 | 2 | — | 1 | 8 | — | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 145 | $ | 25 | $ | 54 | $ | 13 | $ | 237 | $ | 80 | $ | 317 | |||||||||||||||
|
An analysis of our restructuring reserve activity is summarized below:
(In millions) | Severance Costs |
Curtailment Charges, Net |
Asset Impairment |
Contract Terminations |
Total | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 3, 2009 |
$ | 36 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 37 | ||||||||||
Provision in 2009 |
152 | 25 | 54 | 13 | 244 | |||||||||||||||
Reversals |
(7 | ) | — | — | — | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-cash settlement and loss recognition |
— | (25 | ) | (54 | ) | — | (79 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash paid |
(133 | ) | — | — | (11 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
48 | — | — | 3 | 51 | |||||||||||||||
Provision in 2010 |
79 | — | 16 | 7 | 102 | |||||||||||||||
Reversals |
(3 | ) | — | — | — | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-cash settlement |
— | — | (16 | ) | — | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash paid |
(67 | ) | — | — | (5 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
57 | — | — | 5 | 62 | |||||||||||||||
Cash paid |
(42 | ) | — | — | (2 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 15 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | 18 | ||||||||||
|
|
Note 13. Retirement Plans
Our defined benefit and defined contribution plans cover substantially all of our employees. A significant number of our U.S.-based employees participate in the Textron Retirement Plan, which is designed to be a “floor-offset” arrangement with both a defined benefit component and a defined contribution component. The defined benefit component of the arrangement includes the Textron Master Retirement Plan (TMRP) and the Bell Helicopter Textron Master Retirement Plan (BHTMRP), and the defined contribution component is the Retirement Account Plan (RAP). The defined benefit component provides a minimum guaranteed benefit (or “floor” benefit). Under the RAP, participants are eligible to receive contributions from Textron of 2% of their eligible compensation but may not make contributions to the plan. Upon retirement, participants receive the greater of the floor benefit or the value of the RAP. Both the TMRP and the BHTMRP are subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). Effective on January 1, 2010, the Textron Retirement Plan was closed to new participants, and employees hired after that date receive an additional 4% annual cash contribution to their Textron Savings Plan account based on their eligible compensation.
We also have domestic and foreign funded and unfunded defined benefit pension plans that cover certain of our U.S. and foreign employees. In addition, several defined contribution plans are sponsored by our various businesses. The largest such plan is the Textron Savings Plan, which is a qualified 401(k) plan subject to ERISA in which a significant number of our U.S.-based employees participate. Our defined contribution plans cost approximately $85 million, $88 million and $90 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively; these amounts include $23 million, $25 million and $28 million, respectively, in contributions to the RAP. We also provide postretirement benefits other than pensions for certain retired employees in the U.S., which include healthcare, dental care, Medicare Part B reimbursement and life insurance benefits.
Periodic Benefit Cost
The components of our net periodic benefit cost and other amounts recognized in OCI are as follows:
Pension Benefits |
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 129 | $ | 124 | $ | 116 | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
327 | 328 | 323 | 33 | 34 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(393 | ) | (385 | ) | (404 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
16 | 16 | 18 | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
75 | 41 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment and special termination charges |
(1 | ) | 2 | 34 | — | — | (5) | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 153 | $ | 126 | $ | 97 | $ | 44 | $ | 49 | $ | 44 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI, including foreign exchange |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
$ | (75 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (8) | |||||||
Net loss (gain) arising during the year |
556 | 171 | (58 | ) | (17 | ) | — | 24 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit (cost) |
(16 | ) | (16 | ) | (48 | ) | 8 | 4 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) arising during the year |
7 | 5 | 26 | (23 | ) | (16 | ) | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Curtailments and settlements |
1 | (1 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognized in OCI |
$ | 473 | $ | 118 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | 28 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and OCI |
$ | 626 | $ | 244 | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | $ | 26 | $ | 72 | ||||||||||||
|
The estimated amount that will be amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into net periodic pension costs in 2012 is as follows:
(In millions) | Pension Benefits |
Postretirement Other than |
||||||
|
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | 117 | $ | 7 | ||||
Prior service cost (credit) |
16 | (11) | ||||||
|
||||||||
$ | 133 | $ | (4) | |||||
|
Obligations and Funded Status
All of our plans are measured as of our fiscal year-end. The changes in the projected benefit obligation and in the fair value of plan assets, along with our funded status, are as follows:
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation |
||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ | 5,877 | $ | 5,470 | $ | 614 | $ | 646 | ||||||||
Service cost |
129 | 124 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
327 | 328 | 33 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Amendments |
7 | 5 | (23 | ) | (16) | |||||||||||
Plan participants’ contributions |
— | — | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Actuarial losses (gains) |
331 | 292 | (17 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(339 | ) | (330 | ) | (59 | ) | (63) | |||||||||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
(7 | ) | (10 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Curtailments |
— | (2 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
$ | 6,325 | $ | 5,877 | $ | 561 | $ | 614 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of plan assets |
||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
$ | 4,559 | $ | 4,005 | ||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
167 | 505 | ||||||||||||||
Employer contributions |
628 | 390 | ||||||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(339 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
(3 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Settlements and disbursements |
1 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
$ | 5,013 | $ | 4,559 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Funded status at end of year |
$ | (1,312 | ) | $ | (1,318 | ) | $ | (561 | ) | $ | (614) | |||||
|
Amounts recognized in our balance sheets are as follows:
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
$ | 54 | $ | 58 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Current liabilities |
(23 | ) | (22 | ) | (56 | ) | (60) | |||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
(1,343 | ) | (1,354 | ) | (505 | ) | (554) | |||||||||
Recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
2,455 | 1,977 | 91 | 120 | ||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) |
129 | 138 | (50 | ) | (35) | |||||||||||
|
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $6.0 billion and $5.5 billion at December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively, which includes $360 million and $334 million, respectively, in accumulated benefit obligations for unfunded plans where funding is not permitted or in foreign environments where funding is not feasible.
Pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations exceeding the fair value of plan assets are as follows:
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Projected benefit obligation |
$ | 6,153 | $ | 5,706 | ||||
Accumulated benefit obligation |
5,784 | 5,288 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
4,786 | 4,329 |
Assumptions
The weighted-average assumptions we use for our pension and postretirement plans are as follows:
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate |
5.71% | 6.20% | 6.61% | 5.50% | 5.50% | 6.25% | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
7.84% | 8.26% | 8.58% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase |
3.99% | 4.00% | 4.36% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligations at year-end |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate |
4.95% | 5.71% | 6.19% | 4.75% | 5.50% | 5.50% | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increases |
3.49% | 3.99% | 4.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates are as follows:
|
||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
||||||||
Medical cost trend rate |
9% | 8% | ||||||
Prescription drug cost trend rate |
9% | 9% | ||||||
Rate to which medical and prescription drug cost trend rates will gradually decline |
5% | 5% | ||||||
Year that the rates reach the rate where we assume they will remain |
2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|
These assumed healthcare cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the postretirement benefits other than pensions. A one-percentage-point change in these assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects:
(In millions) |
One-
Percentage- |
One- Percentage- Point Decrease |
||||||
|
||||||||
Effect on total of service and interest cost components |
$ | 4 | $ | (3) | ||||
Effect on postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions |
40 | (35) | ||||||
|
Pension Assets
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined based on a variety of considerations, including the established asset allocation targets and expectations for those asset classes, historical returns of the plans’ assets and other market considerations. We invest our pension assets with the objective of achieving a total rate of return, over the long term, sufficient to fund future pension obligations and to minimize future pension contributions. We are willing to tolerate a commensurate level of risk to achieve this objective based on the funded status of the plans and the long-term nature of our pension liability. Risk is controlled by maintaining a portfolio of assets that is diversified across a variety of asset classes, investment styles and investment managers. All of the assets are managed by external investment managers, and the majority of the assets are actively managed. Where possible, investment managers are prohibited from owning our stock in the portfolios that they manage on our behalf.
For U.S. plan assets, which represent the majority of our plan assets, asset allocation target ranges are established consistent with our investment objectives, and the assets are rebalanced periodically. For foreign plan assets, allocations are based on expected cash flow needs and assessments of the local practices and markets. Our target allocation ranges are as follows:
|
||
U.S. Plan Assets |
||
Domestic equity securities |
27 % to 41% | |
International equity securities |
11% to 22% | |
Debt securities |
26% to 34% | |
Private equity partnerships |
5% to 11% | |
Real estate |
9% to 15% | |
Hedge funds |
0% to 7% | |
Foreign Plan Assets |
||
Equity securities |
25% to 70% | |
Debt securities |
30% to 60% | |
Real estate |
3% to 17% | |
|
The fair value of total pension plan assets by major category and level in the fair value hierarchy as defined in Note 9 is as follows:
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 14 | $ | 183 | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | 178 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
1,017 | 482 | — | 1,052 | 469 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
International |
777 | 233 | — | 688 | 251 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
National, state and local governments |
630 | 254 | — | 39 | 570 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
34 | 494 | — | 10 | 432 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
3 | 74 | — | 2 | 103 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Private equity partnerships |
— | — | 314 | — | — | 324 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
— | — | 407 | — | — | 337 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hedge funds |
— | — | 97 | — | — | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,475 | $ | 1,720 | $ | 818 | $ | 1,794 | $ | 2,003 | $ | 762 | ||||||||||||
|
Cash equivalents and equity and debt securities include comingled funds, which represent investments in funds offered to institutional investors that are similar to mutual funds in that they provide diversification by holding various equity and debt securities. Since these comingled funds are not quoted on any active market, they are priced based on the relative value of the underlying equity and debt investments and their individual prices at any given time; accordingly, they are classified as Level 2. Debt securities are valued based on same day actual trading prices, if available. If such prices are not available, we use a matrix pricing model with historical prices, trends and other factors.
Private equity partnerships represent investments in funds, which, in turn, invest in stocks and debt securities of companies that, in most cases, are not publicly traded. These partnerships are valued using income and market methods that include cash flow projections and market multiples for various comparable companies. Real estate includes owned properties and investments in partnerships. Owned properties are valued using certified appraisals at least every three years, which then are updated at least annually by the real estate investment manager, who considers current market trends and other available information. These appraisals generally use the standard methods for valuing real estate, including forecasting income and identifying current transactions for comparable real estate to arrive at a fair value. Real estate partnerships are valued similar to private equity partnerships, with the general partner using standard real estate valuation methods to value the real estate properties and securities held within their fund portfolios. We believe these assumptions are consistent with assumptions that market participants would use in valuing these investments.
Hedge funds represent an investment in a diversified fund of hedge funds of which we are the sole investor. The fund invests in portfolio funds that are not publicly traded and are managed by various portfolio managers. Investments in portfolio funds are typically valued on the basis of the most recent price or valuation provided by the relevant fund’s administrator. The administrator for the fund aggregates these valuations with the other assets and liabilities to calculate the net asset value of the fund.
The table below presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements that use significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) by major category:
(In millions) | Hedge Funds | Private Equity Partnerships |
Real Estate | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 101 | $ | 324 | $ | 337 | ||||||
Actual return on plan assets: |
||||||||||||
Related to assets still held at reporting date |
(4 | ) | 7 | 32 | ||||||||
Related to assets sold during the period |
— | 31 | 2 | |||||||||
Purchases, sales and settlements, net |
— | (48 | ) | 36 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 97 | $ | 314 | $ | 407 | ||||||
|
Estimated Future Cash Flow Impact
Defined benefits under salaried plans are based on salary and years of service. Hourly plans generally provide benefits based on stated amounts for each year of service. Our funding policy is consistent with applicable laws and regulations. In 2012, we expect to contribute approximately $175 million to fund our qualified pension plans, non-qualified plans and foreign plans. Additionally, we expect to contribute $25 million to the RAP. We do not expect to contribute to our other postretirement benefit plans. Benefit payments provided below reflect expected future employee service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid, net of estimated participant contributions, and do not include the Medicare Part D subsidy we expect to receive. These payments are based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligation at the end of fiscal 2011. While pension benefit payments primarily will be paid out of qualified pension trusts, we will pay postretirement benefits other than pensions out of our general corporate assets. Benefit payments that we expect to pay are as follows:
(In millions) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017-2012 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension benefits |
$ | 340 | $ | 347 | $ | 352 | $ | 358 | $ | 365 | $ | 1,957 | ||||||||||||
Post-retirement benefits other than pensions |
58 | 55 | 54 | 52 | 50 | 214 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected Medicare Part D Subsidy |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | — | — | — | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
Note 14. Income Taxes
We conduct business globally and, as a result, file numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns within and outside the U.S. For all of our U.S. subsidiaries, we file a consolidated federal income tax return. Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes is as follows:
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 137 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (229) | |||||
Non-U.S. |
200 | 149 | 80 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 337 | $ | 86 | $ | (149) | ||||||
|
Income tax expense (benefit) for continuing operations is summarized as follows:
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (23 | ) | $ | (79 | ) | $ | 160 | ||||
State |
15 | 3 | 17 | |||||||||
Non-U.S. |
29 | 19 | (8) | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
21 | (57 | ) | 169 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
67 | 59 | (238) | |||||||||
State |
1 | (5 | ) | (22) | ||||||||
Non-U.S. |
6 | (3 | ) | 15 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
74 | 51 | (245) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | 95 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (76) | |||||
|
The current federal and state provisions for 2011 and 2009 include $37 million and $85 million, respectively, of tax related to the sale of certain leverage leases in the Finance segment for which we had previously recorded significant deferred tax liabilities. A substantial portion of the $85 million was paid in 2010.
The following table reconciles the federal statutory income tax rate to our effective income tax rate for continuing operations:
|
||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Federal statutory income tax rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | (35.0)% | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
||||||||||||
State income taxes |
3.1 | (2.7 | ) | 0.4 | ||||||||
Non-U.S. tax rate differential and foreign tax credits |
(9.4 | ) | (60.5 | ) | (13.5) | |||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits and interest |
1.2 | 17.5 | (4.1) | |||||||||
Nondeductible healthcare claims |
— | 12.7 | — | |||||||||
Change in status of subsidiaries |
— | 12.0 | (3.6) | |||||||||
Research credit |
(2.5 | ) | (5.4 | ) | (4.7) | |||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
(1.5 | ) | (5.1 | ) | (1.9) | |||||||
Valuation allowance on contingent receipts |
— | (2.0 | ) | (7.3) | ||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
— | — | 18.5 | |||||||||
Other, net |
2.2 | (7.9 | ) | 0.2 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Effective rate |
28.1 | % | (6.4 | )% | (51.0)% | |||||||
|
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by U.S. federal, state and non-U.S. tax authorities, which may result in proposed assessments. Our estimate for the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. We assess our income tax positions and record tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon management’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, we record the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Interest and penalties are accrued, where applicable. If we do not believe that it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit is recognized.
Our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities due to settlement of income tax examinations, new regulatory or judicial pronouncements, expiration of statutes of limitations or other relevant events. As a result, our effective tax rate may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly and annual basis.
Our unrecognized tax benefits represent tax positions for which reserves have been established. Unrecognized state tax benefits and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits are reflected net of applicable tax benefits. A reconciliation of our unrecognized tax benefits, excluding accrued interest, is as follows:
|
||||||
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
|
||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ 285 | $ | 294 | |||
Additions for tax positions related to current year |
8 | 7 | ||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
8 | 8 | ||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
(7) | (17) | ||||
Reductions for expiration of statute of limitations |
— | (5) | ||||
Reductions for settlements with tax authorities |
— | (2) | ||||
|
||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ 294 | $ | 285 | |||
|
At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, approximately $206 million and $197 million, respectively, of these unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would favorably affect our effective tax rate in a future period. The remaining $88 million in unrecognized tax benefits are related to discontinued operations. Unrecognized tax benefits were reduced in 2011 and 2010, primarily related to favorable tax audit resolutions. Based on the outcome of appeals proceedings and the expiration of statutes of limitations, it is possible that certain audit cycles for U.S. and foreign jurisdictions could be completed during the next 12 months, which could result in a change in our balance of unrecognized tax benefits with the aggregate tax effect of the differences between tax return positions and the benefits being recognized in our financial statements. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined, we believe adequate provision has been made for any potential unfavorable financial statement impact.
In the normal course of business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including major jurisdictions such as Belgium, Canada, Germany, Japan and the U.S. With few exceptions, we no longer are subject to U.S. federal, state and local income tax examinations for years before 1997. We are no longer subject to non-U.S. income tax examinations in our major jurisdictions for years before 2005.
During 2011, 2010 and 2009, we recognized net tax-related interest expense totaling approximately $10 million, $19 million and $12 million, respectively, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, we had a total of $132 million and $122 million, respectively, of net accrued interest expense included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of our net deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||||
|
||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
||||||||
Obligation for pension and postretirement benefits |
$ | 635 | $ | 692 | ||||
Deferred compensation |
196 | 203 | ||||||
Accrued expenses* |
193 | 255 | ||||||
Valuation allowance on finance receivables held for sale |
130 | 29 | ||||||
Loss carryforwards |
74 | 66 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
68 | 141 | ||||||
Deferred income |
52 | 59 | ||||||
Inventory |
38 | — | ||||||
Other, net |
172 | 177 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
1,558 | 1,622 | ||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
(189 | ) | (200) | |||||
|
||||||||
$ | 1,369 | $ | 1,422 | |||||
|
||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||
Leasing transactions |
$ | (285 | ) | $ | (387) | |||
Property, plant and equipment, principally depreciation |
(145 | ) | (132) | |||||
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles |
(111 | ) | (135) | |||||
Inventory |
— | (15) | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(541 | ) | (669) | |||||
|
||||||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | 828 | $ | 753 | ||||
|
* Accrued expenses includes warranty and product maintenance reserves, self-insured liabilities, interest and restructuring reserves.
We believe that our earnings during the periods when the temporary differences become deductible will be sufficient to realize the related future income tax benefits. For those jurisdictions where the expiration date of tax carryforwards or the projected operating results indicate that realization is not more than likely, a valuation allowance is provided.
The following table presents the breakdown between current and long-term net deferred tax assets:
|
||||||
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
|
||||||
Current |
$ 288 | $ | 290 | |||
Non-current |
532 | 571 | ||||
|
||||||
820 | 861 | |||||
Finance group’s net deferred tax asset (liability) |
8 | (108) | ||||
|
||||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ 828 | $ | 753 | |||
|
Our net operating loss and credit carryforwards at December 31, 2011 are as follows:
(In millions) | ||||
|
||||
Non-U.S. net operating loss with no expiration |
$ | 98 | ||
Non-U.S. net operating loss expiring through 2031 |
45 | |||
State net operating loss and tax credits, net of tax benefits, expiring through 2027 |
36 | |||
U.S. federal tax credits beginning to expire in 2021 |
30 | |||
|
The undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries approximated $470 million at December 31, 2011. We consider the undistributed earnings to be indefinitely reinvested; therefore, we have not provided a deferred tax liability for any residual U.S. tax that may be due upon repatriation of these earnings. Because of the effect of U.S. foreign tax credits, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable on these earnings in the event they no longer are indefinitely reinvested.
|
Note 15. Contingencies and Commitments
We are subject to legal proceedings and other claims arising out of the conduct of our business, including proceedings and claims relating to commercial and financial transactions; government contracts; compliance with applicable laws and regulations; production partners; product liability; employment; and environmental, safety and health matters. Some of these legal proceedings and claims seek damages, fines or penalties in substantial amounts or remediation of environmental contamination. As a government contractor, we are subject to audits, reviews and investigations to determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements. Under federal government procurement regulations, certain claims brought by the U.S. Government could result in our being suspended or debarred from U.S. Government contracting for a period of time. On the basis of information presently available, we do not believe that existing proceedings and claims will have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
On February 7, 2012, a lawsuit was filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division (Akron) by Brian A. Bash, Chapter 7 Trustee for Fair Finance Company against TFC, Fortress Credit Corp. and Fair Facility I, LLC. TFC provided a revolving line of credit of up to $17.5 million to Fair Finance Company from 2002 through 2007. The complaint alleges numerous counts against TFC, as Fair Finance Company’s working capital lender, including receipt of fraudulent transfers and assisting in fraud perpetrated on Fair Finance investors. The Trustee seeks avoidance and recovery of alleged fraudulent transfers in the amount of $316 million as well as damages of $223 million on the other claims. The Trustee also seeks trebled damages on all claims under Ohio law. This action was filed very recently; therefore, we are still in the process of reviewing the complaint and assessing these claims. We intend to vigorously defend this lawsuit. An estimate of a range of possible loss cannot be made at this time due to the early stage of the litigation.
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into standby letter of credit agreements and surety bonds with financial institutions to meet various performance and other obligations. These outstanding letter of credit arrangements and surety bonds aggregated to approximately $260 million and $325 million at the end of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
Environmental Remediation
As with other industrial enterprises engaged in similar businesses, we are involved in a number of remedial actions under various federal and state laws and regulations relating to the environment that impose liability on companies to clean up, or contribute to the cost of cleaning up, sites on which hazardous wastes or materials were disposed or released. Our accrued environmental liabilities relate to installation of remediation systems, disposal costs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency oversight costs, legal fees, and operating and maintenance costs for both currently and formerly owned or operated facilities. Circumstances that can affect the reliability and precision of the accruals include the identification of additional sites, environmental regulations, level of cleanup required, technologies available, number and financial condition of other contributors to remediation, and the time period over which remediation may occur. We believe that any changes to the accruals that may result from these factors and uncertainties will not have a material effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Based upon information currently available, we estimate that our potential environmental liabilities are within the range of $48 million to $192 million. At December 31, 2011, environmental reserves of approximately $79 million have been established to address these specific estimated liabilities. We estimate that we will likely pay our accrued environmental remediation liabilities over the next five to 10 years and have classified $25 million as current liabilities. Expenditures to evaluate and remediate contaminated sites approximated $9 million, $10 million and $11 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Leases
Rental expense approximated $93 million in 2011, $92 million in 2010 and $100 million in 2009. Future minimum rental commitments for noncancelable operating leases in effect at December 31, 2011 approximated $58 million for 2012, $46 million for 2013, $38 million for 2014, $31 million for 2015, $27 million for 2016 and a total of $138 million thereafter.
|
Note 16. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
We have made the following cash payments:
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Interest paid: |
||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
$ | 135 | $ | 145 | $ | 116 | ||||||
Finance group |
89 | 127 | 171 | |||||||||
Taxes paid, net of refunds received: |
||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
30 | 59 | 49 | |||||||||
Finance group |
(65 | ) | 101 | (75) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
— | 2 | 156 | |||||||||
|
Cash paid for interest by the Finance group includes amounts paid to the Manufacturing group of $26 million, $32 million and $3 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In 2010, taxes paid, net of refunds received for the Finance group includes $103 million in taxes paid primarily attributable to a settlement related to the challenge of tax deductions we took in prior years for certain leverage lease transactions.
|
Note 17. Segment and Geographic Data
We operate in, and report financial information for, the following five business segments: Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems, Industrial and Finance. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1.
Cessna products include Citation business jets, Caravan single-engine turboprops, single-engine piston aircraft, and aftermarket services sold to a diverse base of corporate and individual buyers.
Bell products include military and commercial helicopters, tiltrotor aircraft and related spare parts and services for U.S. and non-U.S. governments in the defense and aerospace industries and general aviation markets.
Textron Systems products include armored security vehicles, advanced marine craft, precision weapons, airborne and ground-based surveillance systems and services, the Unmanned Aircraft System, training and simulation systems and countersniper devices, and intelligence and situational awareness software for U.S. and non-U.S. governments in the defense and aerospace industries and general aviation markets.
Industrial products and markets include the following:
• |
Kautex products include blow-molded plastic fuel systems, windshield and headlamp washer systems, selective catalytic reduction systems, engine camshafts and other parts that are marketed primarily to automobile original equipment manufacturers, as well as plastic bottles and containers for various uses; |
• |
Greenlee products include powered equipment, electrical test and measurement instruments, hand and hydraulic powered tools, and electrical and fiber optic assemblies, principally used in the electrical construction and maintenance, plumbing, wiring, telecommunications and data communications industries; and |
• |
E-Z-GO and Jacobsen products include golf cars; professional turf-maintenance equipment; and off-road, multipurpose utility and specialized turf-care vehicles that are marketed primarily to golf courses, resort communities, municipalities, sporting venues, and commercial and industrial users. |
The Finance segment provided secured commercial loans and leases primarily in North America to the aviation, golf equipment, asset-based lending, distribution finance, golf mortgage, hotel, structured capital and timeshare markets through the fourth quarter of 2008, when we announced a plan to exit the non-captive portion of the commercial finance business of the segment while retaining the captive portion of the business that supports customer purchases of products that we manufacture.
Segment profit is an important measure used for evaluating performance and for decision-making purposes. Segment profit for the manufacturing segments excludes interest expense, certain corporate expenses and special charges. The measurement for the Finance segment excludes special charges and includes interest income and expense along with intercompany interest expense. Provisions for losses on finance receivables involving the sale or lease of our products are recorded by the selling manufacturing division when our Finance group has recourse to the Manufacturing group.
Our revenues by segment, along with a reconciliation of segment profit to income from continuing operations before income taxes, are as follows:
Revenues | Segment Profit (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 2,990 | $ | 2,563 | $ | 3,320 | $ | 60 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 198 | |||||||||||
Bell |
3,525 | 3,241 | 2,842 | 521 | 427 | 304 | ||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
1,872 | 1,979 | 1,899 | 141 | 230 | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
2,785 | 2,524 | 2,078 | 202 | 162 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance |
103 | 218 | 361 | (333 | ) | (237 | ) | (294) | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,275 | $ | 10,525 | $ | 10,500 | 591 | 553 | 475 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special charges |
— | (190 | ) | (317) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses and other, net |
(114 | ) | (137 | ) | (164) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net for Manufacturing group |
(140 | ) | (140 | ) | (143) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 337 | $ | 86 | $ | (149) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues by major product type are summarized below:
Revenues | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Fixed-wing aircraft |
$ | 2,990 | $ | 2,563 | $ | 3,320 | ||||||
Rotor aircraft |
3,525 | 3,241 | 2,842 | |||||||||
Unmanned aircraft systems, armored security vehicles, precision weapons and other |
1,872 | 1,979 | 1,899 | |||||||||
Fuel systems and functional components |
1,823 | 1,640 | 1,287 | |||||||||
Powered tools, testing and measurement equipment |
402 | 330 | 300 | |||||||||
Golf and turf-care products |
560 | 554 | 491 | |||||||||
Finance |
103 | 218 | 361 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
$ | 11,275 | $ | 10,525 | $ | 10,500 | |||||||
|
Our revenues included sales to the U.S. Government of approximately $3.5 billion, $3.6 billion and $3.3 billion in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily in the Bell and Textron Systems segments.
Other information by segment is provided below:
Assets | Capital Expenditures | Depreciation and Amortization | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 2,078 | $ | 2,294 | $ | 101 | $ | 47 | $ | 65 | $ | 109 | $ | 106 | $ | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
Bell |
2,247 | 2,079 | 184 | 123 | 101 | 95 | 92 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
1,948 | 1,997 | 37 | 41 | 31 | 85 | 81 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
1,664 | 1,604 | 94 | 51 | 38 | 72 | 72 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance |
3,213 | 4,949 | — | — | — | 32 | 31 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
2,465 | 2,359 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13,615 | $ | 15,282 | $ | 423 | $ | 270 | $ | 238 | $ | 403 | $ | 393 | $ | 409 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Geographic Data
Presented below is selected financial information of our continuing operations by geographic area:
Revenues* | Property, Plant and Equipment, net** |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 7,138 | $ | 6,688 | $ | 6,563 | $ | 1,557 | $ | 1,565 | ||||||||||
Europe |
1,577 | 1,448 | 1,625 | 236 | 220 | |||||||||||||||
Canada |
289 | 347 | 344 | 100 | 89 | |||||||||||||||
Latin America and Mexico |
820 | 815 | 815 | 36 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Asia and Australia |
1,032 | 776 | 553 | 76 | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Middle East and Africa |
419 | 451 | 600 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,275 | $ | 10,525 | $ | 10,500 | $ | 2,005 | $ | 1,948 | |||||||||||
|
* Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.
** Property, plant and equipment, net are based on the location of the asset.
|
Quarterly Data
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 556 | $ | 652 | $ | 771 | $ | 1,011 | $ | 433 | $ | 635 | $ | 535 | $ | 960 | ||||||||||||||||
Bell |
749 | 872 | 894 | 1,010 | 618 | 823 | 825 | 975 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
445 | 452 | 462 | 513 | 458 | 534 | 460 | 527 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
703 | 719 | 655 | 708 | 625 | 661 | 600 | 638 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance |
26 | 33 | 32 | 12 | 76 | 56 | 59 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 2,479 | $ | 2,728 | $ | 2,814 | $ | 3,254 | $ | 2,210 | $ | 2,709 | $ | 2,479 | $ | 3,127 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment profit |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | (38 | ) | $ | 5 | $ | 33 | $ | 60 | $ | (24 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 23 | |||||||||||||
Bell |
91 | 120 | 143 | 167 | 74 | 108 | 107 | 138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems (a) |
53 | 49 | 47 | (8 | ) | 55 | 70 | 50 | 55 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
61 | 55 | 37 | 49 | 49 | 51 | 37 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance (b) |
(44 | ) | (33 | ) | (24 | ) | (232 | ) | (58 | ) | (71 | ) | (51 | ) | (57) | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total segment profit |
123 | 196 | 236 | 36 | 96 | 161 | 112 | 184 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses and other, net |
(39 | ) | (23 | ) | (13 | ) | (39 | ) | (37 | ) | (17 | ) | (35 | ) | (48) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net for Manufacturing group |
(38 | ) | (38 | ) | (37 | ) | (27 | ) | (36 | ) | (35 | ) | (32 | ) | (37) | |||||||||||||||||
Special charges (c) |
— | — | — | — | (12 | ) | (10 | ) | (114 | ) | (54) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
(15 | ) | (43 | ) | (50 | ) | 13 | (15 | ) | (18 | ) | 21 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
31 | 92 | 136 | (17 | ) | (4 | ) | 81 | (48 | ) | 63 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | 6 | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | 1 | — | (3) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 29 | $ | 90 | $ | 142 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 82 | $ | (48 | ) | $ | 60 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.11 | $ | 0.33 | $ | 0.49 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.30 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.23 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
(0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | 0.02 | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | — | — | (0.01) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.51 | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.30 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.22 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic average shares outstanding (In thousands) |
276,358 | 277,406 | 278,090 | 278,881 | 273,174 | 274,098 | 274,896 | 275,640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share (d) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.45 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.20 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
(0.01 | ) | — | 0.02 | (0.01 | ) | (0.02 | ) | — | — | (0.01) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.09 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.47 | $ | (0.07 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | (0.17 | ) | $ | 0.19 | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted average shares outstanding (In thousands) |
319,119 | 315,208 | 300,866 | 278,881 | 273,174 | 302,397 | 274,896 | 308,491 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment profit margins |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
(6.8 | )% | 0.8 | % | 4.3 | % | 5.9 | % | (5.5 | )% | 0.5 | % | (5.8 | )% | 2.4% | |||||||||||||||||
Bell |
12.1 | 13.8 | 16.0 | 16.5 | 12.0 | 13.1 | 13.0 | 14.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
11.9 | 10.8 | 10.2 | (1.6 | ) | 12.0 | 13.1 | 10.9 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
8.7 | 7.6 | 5.6 | 6.9 | 7.8 | 7.7 | 6.2 | 3.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance |
(169.2 | ) | (100.0 | ) | (75.0 | ) | (1,933.3 | ) | (76.1 | ) | (126.8 | ) | (86.4 | ) | (211.1) | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment profit margin |
5.0 | % | 7.2 | % | 8.4 | % | 1.1 | % | 4.3 | % | 5.9 | % | 4.5 | % | 5.9% | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock information (d) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Price range: High |
$ | 28.87 | $ | 28.65 | $ | 25.17 | $ | 20.41 | $ | 23.46 | $ | 25.30 | $ | 21.52 | $ | 24.18 | ||||||||||||||||
Low |
$ | 23.50 | $ | 20.86 | $ | 14.66 | $ | 16.37 | $ | 17.96 | $ | 15.88 | $ | 16.02 | $ | 19.92 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared per share |
$ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | ||||||||||||||||
|
(a) | The fourth quarter of 2011 includes a $41 million impairment charge to write down certain intangible assets and approximately $19 million in severance costs related to a workforce reduction at the segment. |
(b) | The fourth quarter of 2011 includes a $186 million initial mark-to-market adjustment for remaining finance receivables in the Golf Mortgage portfolio that were transferred to the held for sale classification in the quarter. |
(c) | Special charges include restructuring charges of $99 million in 2010, primarily related to severance and asset impairment charges. In addition, in the third quarter of 2010, special charges include a $91 million charge to reclassify a foreign exchange loss from equity to the income statement as a result of substantially liquidating a Finance segment entity. |
(d) | For the fourth quarter of 2011 and the first and third quarters of 2010, the potential dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock units and the shares that could be issued upon the conversion of our convertible senior notes and upon the exercise of the related warrants was excluded from the computation of diluted weighted-average shares outstanding as the shares would have an anti-dilutive effect on the loss from continuing operations. |
|
Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 20 | $ | 23 | $ | 24 | ||||||
Charged to costs and expenses |
7 | 2 | 8 | |||||||||
Deductions from reserves* |
(9 | ) | (5 | ) | (9) | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 18 | $ | 20 | $ | 23 | ||||||
|
||||||||||||
Inventory FIFO reserves |
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 133 | $ | 158 | $ | 114 | ||||||
Charged to costs and expenses |
35 | 54 | 126 | |||||||||
Deductions from reserves* |
(34 | ) | (79 | ) | (82) | |||||||
|
||||||||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 134 | $ | 133 | $ | 158 | ||||||
|
* | Deductions primarily include amounts written off on uncollectable accounts (less recoveries), inventory disposals and currency translation adjustments. |
|
Our Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Textron Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries. Our financings are conducted through two separate borrowing groups. The Manufacturing group consists of Textron Inc. consolidated with its majority-owned subsidiaries that operate in the Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems and Industrial segments. The Finance group, which also is the Finance segment, consists of Textron Financial Corporation (TFC), its consolidated subsidiaries and three other finance subsidiaries owned by Textron Inc. We designed this framework to enhance our borrowing power by separating the Finance group. Our Manufacturing group operations include the development, production and delivery of tangible goods and services, while our Finance group provides financial services. Due to the fundamental differences between each borrowing group’s activities, investors, rating agencies and analysts use different measures to evaluate each group’s performance. To support those evaluations, we present balance sheet and cash flow information for each borrowing group within the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our Finance group provides captive financing for retail purchases and leases for new and used aircraft and equipment manufactured by our Manufacturing group. In the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, cash received from customers or from the sale of receivables is reflected as operating activities when received from third parties. However, in the cash flow information provided for the separate borrowing groups, cash flows related to captive financing activities are reflected based on the operations of each group. For example, when product is sold by our Manufacturing group to a customer and is financed by the Finance group, the origination of the finance receivable is recorded within investing activities as a cash outflow in the Finance group’s statement of cash flows. Meanwhile, in the Manufacturing group’s statement of cash flows, the cash received from the Finance group on the customer’s behalf is recorded within operating cash flows as a cash inflow. Although cash is transferred between the two borrowing groups, there is no cash transaction reported in the consolidated cash flows at the time of the original financing. These captive financing activities, along with all significant intercompany transactions, are reclassified or eliminated in consolidation.
Our Bell segment has a strategic alliance agreement with The Boeing Company (Boeing) to provide engineering, development and test services related to the V-22 aircraft, as well as to produce the V-22 aircraft, under a number of separate contracts with the U.S. Government (V-22 Contracts). The alliance created by this agreement is not a legal entity and has no employees, no assets and no true operations. This agreement creates contractual rights and does not represent an entity in which we have an equity interest. We account for this alliance as a collaborative arrangement with Bell and Boeing reporting costs incurred and revenues generated from transactions with the U.S. Government in each company’s respective income statement. Neither Bell nor Boeing is considered to be the principal participant for the transactions recorded under this agreement. Profits on cost-plus contracts are allocated between Bell and Boeing on a 50%-50% basis. Negotiated profits on fixed-price contracts are also allocated 50%-50%; however, Bell and Boeing are each responsible for their own cost overruns and are entitled to retain any cost underruns. Based on the contractual arrangement established under the alliance, Bell accounts for its rights and obligations under the specific requirements of the V-22 Contracts allocated to Bell under the work breakdown structure. We account for all of our rights and obligations, including warranty, product and any contingent liabilities, under the specific requirements of the V-22 Contracts allocated to us under the agreement. Revenues and cost of sales reflect our performance under the V-22 Contracts with revenues recognized using the units-of-delivery method. We include all assets used in performance of the V-22 Contracts that we own, including inventory and unpaid receivables and all liabilities arising from our obligations under the V-22 Contracts in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which require us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Our estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of changes, if any, are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the period that they are determined.
During 2011 and 2010, we changed our estimates of revenues and costs on certain long-term contracts that are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, primarily in our Bell V-22 and H-1 programs. The changes in estimates increased income from continuing operations before income taxes in 2011 and 2010 by $54 million and $78 million, respectively, ($34 million and $49 million after tax, or $0.11 and $0.16 per diluted share, respectively). These changes were primarily related to favorable cost and operational performance. For 2011 and 2010, the gross favorable program profit adjustments totaled $83 million and $98 million, respectively. For 2011 and 2010, the gross unfavorable program profit adjustments totaled $29 million and $20 million, respectively.
Cash and equivalents consist of cash and short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
We generally recognize revenue for the sale of products, which are not under long-term contracts, upon delivery. For commercial aircraft, delivery is upon completion of manufacturing, customer acceptance, and the transfer of the risk and rewards of ownership. Taxes collected from customers and remitted to government authorities are recorded on a net basis.
When a sale arrangement involves multiple deliverables, such as sales of products that include customization and other services, we evaluate the arrangement to determine whether there are separate items that are required to be delivered under the arrangement that qualify as separate units of accounting. These arrangements typically involve the customization services we offer to customers who purchase Bell helicopters, and the services generally are provided within the first six months after the customer accepts the aircraft and assumes risk of loss. We consider the aircraft and the customization services to be separate units of accounting and allocate contract price between the two on a relative selling price basis using the best evidence of selling price for each of the arrangement deliverables, typically by reference to the price charged when the same or similar items are sold separately by us, taking into consideration any performance, cancellation, termination or refund-type provisions. We recognize revenue when the recognition criteria for each unit of accounting are met.
Long-Term Contracts — Revenues under long-term contracts are accounted for under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting. Under this method, we estimate profit as the difference between the total estimated revenues and cost of a contract. We then recognize that estimated profit over the contract term based on either the units-of-delivery method or the cost-to-cost method (which typically is used for development effort as costs are incurred), as appropriate under the circumstances. Revenues under fixed-price contracts generally are recorded using the units-of-delivery method. Revenues under cost-reimbursement contracts are recorded using the cost-to-cost method.
Long-term contract profits are based on estimates of total contract cost and revenues utilizing current contract specifications, expected engineering requirements, the achievement of contract milestones and product deliveries. Certain contracts are awarded with fixed-price incentive fees that also are considered when estimating revenues and profit rates. Contract costs typically are incurred over a period of several years, and the estimation of these costs requires substantial judgment. Our cost estimation process is based on the professional knowledge and experience of engineers and program managers along with finance professionals. We update our projections of costs at least semiannually or when circumstances significantly change. When adjustments are required, any changes from prior estimates are recognized using the cumulative catch-up method with the impact of the change from inception-to-date recorded in the current period. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full in the period in which the losses become probable and estimable.
Finance Revenues — Finance revenues include interest on finance receivables, direct loan origination costs and fees received, and capital and leveraged lease earnings, as well as portfolio gains/losses. Portfolio gains/losses include gains/losses on the sale or early termination of finance assets and impairment charges related to repossessed assets and properties and operating assets received in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables. Revenues on direct loan origination costs and fees received are deferred and amortized to finance revenues over the contractual lives of the respective receivables and credit lines using the interest method. When receivables are sold or prepaid, unamortized amounts are recognized in finance revenues.
We recognize interest using the interest method, which provides a constant rate of return over the terms of the receivables. Accrual of interest income is suspended if credit quality indicators suggest full collection of principal and interest is doubtful. In addition, we automatically suspend the accrual of interest income for accounts that are contractually delinquent by more than three months unless collection is not doubtful. Cash payments on nonaccrual accounts, including finance charges, generally are applied to reduce the net investment balance. We resume the accrual of interest when the loan becomes contractually current through payment according to the original terms of the loan or, if a loan has been modified, following a period of performance under the terms of the modification, provided we conclude that collection of all principal and interest is no longer doubtful. Previously suspended interest income is recognized at that time.
Finance receivables are classified as held for sale based on the determination that we no longer intend to hold the receivables for the foreseeable future, until maturity or payoff, or we no longer have the ability to hold to maturity. Our decision to classify certain finance receivables as held for sale is based on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, contractual duration, type of collateral, credit strength of the borrowers, interest rates and perceived marketability of the receivables. On an ongoing basis,
these factors, combined with our overall liquidation strategy, determine which finance receivables we have the intent to hold for the foreseeable future and which finance receivables we will hold for sale. Our current strategy is based on an evaluation of both our performance and liquidity position and changes in external factors affecting the value and/or marketability of our finance receivables. A change in this strategy could result in a change in the classification of our finance receivables.
Finance receivables held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. At the time of transfer to the held for sale classification, we establish a valuation allowance for any shortfall between the carrying value and fair value. In addition, any allowance for loan losses previously allocated to these finance receivables is transferred to the valuation allowance account, which is netted with finance receivables held for sale on the balance sheet. This valuation allowance is adjusted quarterly. Fair value changes can occur based on market interest rates, market liquidity, and changes in the credit quality of the borrower and value of underlying loan collateral. If we determine that finance receivables classified as held for sale will not be sold and we have the intent and ability to hold the finance receivables for the foreseeable future, until maturity or payoff, the finance receivables are transferred to the held for investment classification at the lower of cost or fair value.
Finance receivables are classified as held for investment when we have the intent and the ability to hold the receivable for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff. Finance receivables held for investment are generally recorded at the amount of outstanding principal less allowance for losses.
We maintain the allowance for losses on finance receivables held for investment at a level considered adequate to cover inherent losses in the portfolio based on management’s evaluation and analysis by product line. For larger balance accounts specifically identified as impaired, including large accounts in homogeneous portfolios, a reserve is established based on comparing the carrying value with either a) the expected future cash flows, discounted at the finance receivable’s effective interest rate; or b) the fair value of the underlying collateral, if the finance receivable is collateral dependent. The expected future cash flows consider collateral value; financial performance and liquidity of our borrower; existence and financial strength of guarantors; estimated recovery costs, including legal expenses; and costs associated with the repossession/foreclosure and eventual disposal of collateral. When there is a range of potential outcomes, we perform multiple discounted cash flow analyses and weight the outcomes based on management’s estimate of their relative likelihood of occurrence.
The evaluation of our portfolios is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates, including the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be received on impaired finance receivables and the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, which may differ from actual results. While our analysis is specific to each individual account, critical factors included in this analysis vary by product line and include the following:
• |
Aviation—industry valuation guides, physical condition of the aircraft, payment history, and existence and financial strength of guarantors. |
• |
Golf Equipment—age and condition of the collateral. |
• |
Timeshare—historical performance of consumer notes receivable collateral, real estate valuations, operating expenses of the borrower, the impact of bankruptcy court rulings on the value of the collateral, legal and other professional expenses and borrower’s access to capital. |
We also establish an allowance for losses by product line to cover probable but specifically unknown losses existing in the portfolio. For homogeneous portfolios, including Aviation and Golf Equipment, the allowance is established as a percentage of non-recourse finance receivables, which have not been identified as requiring specific reserves. The percentage is based on a combination of factors, including historical loss experience, current delinquency and default trends, collateral values and both general economic and specific industry trends. For non-homogeneous portfolios, such as Timeshare, the allowance is established as a percentage of watchlist balances, as defined on page 58, which represents a combination of assumed default likelihood and loss severity based on historical experience, industry trends and collateral values. In estimating our allowance for losses to cover accounts not specifically identified, critical factors vary by product line and include the following:
• |
Aviation—the collateral value of the portfolio, historical default experience and delinquency trends. |
• |
Golf Equipment—historical loss experience and delinquency trends. |
• |
Timeshare—individual loan credit quality indicators such as borrowing base shortfalls for revolving notes receivable facilities, default rates of our notes receivable collateral, borrower’s access to capital, historical progression from watchlist to nonaccrual status and estimates of loss severity based on analysis of impaired loans in the product line. |
Finance receivables held for investment are written down to the fair value (less estimated costs to sell) of the related collateral when the collateral is repossessed, and are charged off when the remaining balance is deemed to be uncollectable.
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. We value our inventories generally using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method or the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for certain qualifying inventories where LIFO provides a better matching of costs and revenues. We determine costs for our commercial helicopters on an average cost basis by model considering the expended and estimated costs for the current production release. Inventoried costs related to long-term contracts are stated at actual production costs, including allocable operating overhead, advances to suppliers, and, in the case of contracts with the U.S. Government, allocable research and development and general and administrative expenses. Since our inventoried costs include amounts related to contracts with long production cycles, a portion of these costs is not expected to be realized within one year. Pursuant to contract provisions, agencies of the U.S. Government have title to, or security interest in, inventories related to such contracts as a result of advances, performance-based payments and progress payments. Such advances and payments are reflected as an offset against the related inventory balances. Customer deposits are recorded against inventory when the right of offset exists. All other customer deposits are recorded in accrued liabilities.
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated primarily using the straight-line method. We capitalize expenditures for improvements that increase asset values and extend useful lives.
At acquisition, we estimate and record the fair value of purchased intangible assets primarily using a discounted cash flow analysis of anticipated cash flows reflecting incremental revenues and/or cost savings resulting from the acquired intangible asset using market participant assumptions. Amortization of intangible assets with finite lives is recognized over their estimated useful lives using a method of amortization that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible assets are consumed or otherwise realized. Approximately 36% of our gross intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method, with the remaining assets, primarily customer agreements, amortized based on the cash flow streams used to value the asset.
Long-lived assets, including intangible assets subject to amortization, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of the asset held for use exceeds the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows, the carrying value of the asset generally is written down to fair value. Long-lived assets held for sale are stated at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. Fair value is determined using pertinent market information, including estimated future discounted cash flows.
We evaluate the recoverability of goodwill annually in the fourth quarter or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances, such as declines in sales, earnings or cash flows, or material adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that the carrying value of a reporting unit might be impaired. The reporting unit represents the operating segment unless discrete financial information is prepared and reviewed by segment management for businesses one level below that operating segment, in which case such component is the reporting unit. In certain instances, we have aggregated components of an operating segment into a single reporting unit based on similar economic characteristics.
In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued guidance that permits companies to perform a qualitative assessment based on economic, industry and company-specific factors as the initial step in the annual goodwill impairment test for all or selected reporting units. Based on the results of the qualitative assessment, companies are only required to perform Step 1 of the annual impairment test for a reporting unit if the company concludes that it is more likely than not that the unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount. As permitted, we adopted this guidance in the fourth quarter of 2011 to reduce the costs associated with determining each reporting unit’s fair value for the units where it is more likely than not that the fair value exceeds its carrying amount. For the reporting units for which we did not elect to perform a qualitative assessment, we calculated fair value of each reporting unit primarily using discounted cash flows that incorporate assumptions for the unit’s short- and long-term revenue growth rates, operating margins and discount rates, which represent our best estimates of current and forecasted market conditions, current cost structure, anticipated net cost reductions, and the implied rate of return that we believe a market participant would require for an investment in a company having similar risks and business characteristics to the reporting unit being assessed. Goodwill is considered to be potentially impaired when the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value.
We maintain various pension and postretirement plans for our employees globally. These plans include significant pension and postretirement benefit obligations, which are calculated based on actuarial valuations. Key assumptions used in determining these obligations and related expenses include expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, discount rates and healthcare cost projections. We evaluate and update these assumptions annually in consultation with third-party actuaries and investment advisors. We also make assumptions regarding employee demographic factors such as retirement patterns, mortality, turnover and rate of compensation increases. We recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and postretirement plans in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and recognize changes in the funded status of our defined benefit plans in comprehensive income in the year in which they occur. Actuarial gains and losses that are not immediately recognized as net periodic pension cost are recognized as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income (OCI) and are amortized into net periodic pension cost in future periods.
We are exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. To manage the volatility relating to our exposures, we net these exposures on a consolidated basis to take advantage of natural offsets. For the residual portion, we enter into various derivative transactions pursuant to our policies in areas such as counterparty exposure and hedging practices. All derivative instruments are reported at fair value in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Designation to support hedge accounting is performed on a specific exposure basis. For financial instruments qualifying as fair value hedges, we record changes in fair value in earnings, offset, in part or in whole, by corresponding changes in the fair value of the underlying exposures being hedged. For cash flow hedges, we record changes in the fair value of derivatives (to the extent they are effective as hedges) in OCI, net of deferred taxes. Changes in fair value of derivatives not qualifying as hedges are recorded in earnings.
Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars. Adjustments from currency rate changes are recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account in shareholders’ equity until the related foreign entity is sold or substantially liquidated. We use foreign currency financing transactions to effectively hedge long-term investments in foreign operations with the same corresponding currency. Foreign currency gains and losses on the hedge of the long-term investments are recorded in the cumulative translation adjustment account with the offset recorded as an adjustment to debt.
Finance Revenues — Finance revenues include interest on finance receivables, direct loan origination costs and fees received, and capital and leveraged lease earnings, as well as portfolio gains/losses. Portfolio gains/losses include gains/losses on the sale or early termination of finance assets and impairment charges related to repossessed assets and properties and operating assets received in satisfaction of troubled finance receivables. Revenues on direct loan origination costs and fees received are deferred and amortized to finance revenues over the contractual lives of the respective receivables and credit lines using the interest method. When receivables are sold or prepaid, unamortized amounts are recognized in finance revenues.
We accrue for product liability claims and related defense costs when a loss is probable and reasonably estimable. Our estimates are generally based on the specifics of each claim or incident and our best estimate of the probable loss using historical experience and considering the insurance coverage and deductibles in effect at the date of the incident.
Liabilities for environmental matters are recorded on a site-by-site basis when it is probable that an obligation has been incurred and the cost can be reasonably estimated. We estimate our accrued environmental liabilities using currently available facts, existing technology, and presently enacted laws and regulations, all of which are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties. Our environmental liabilities are not discounted and do not take into consideration possible future insurance proceeds or significant amounts from claims against other third parties.
We have incurred asset retirement obligations primarily related to costs to remove and dispose of underground storage tanks and asbestos materials used in insulation, adhesive fillers and floor tiles. There is no legal requirement to remove these items, and there currently is no plan to remodel the related facilities or otherwise cause the impacted items to require disposal. Since these asset retirement obligations are not estimable, there is no related liability recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
We provide limited warranty and product maintenance programs, including parts and labor, for certain products for periods ranging from one to five years. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under warranty programs and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time product revenues are recognized. Factors that affect this liability include the number of products sold, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We assess the adequacy of our recorded warranty and product maintenance liabilities periodically and adjust the amounts as necessary. Additionally, we may establish warranty liabilities related to the issuance of aircraft service bulletins for aircraft no longer covered under the limited warranty programs.
Our customer-funded research and development costs are charged directly to the related contracts, which primarily consist of U.S. Government contracts. In accordance with government regulations, we recover a portion of company-funded research and development costs through overhead rate charges on our U.S. Government contracts. Research and development costs that are not reimbursable under a contract with the U.S. Government or another customer are charged to expense as incurred. Company-funded research and development costs were $525 million, $403 million, and $401 million in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and are included in cost of sales.
Deferred income tax balances reflect the effects of temporary differences between the financial reporting carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases, as well as from net operating losses and tax credit carryforwards, and are stated at enacted tax rates in effect for the year taxes are expected to be paid or recovered. Deferred income tax assets represent amounts available to reduce income taxes payable on taxable income in future years. We evaluate the recoverability of these future tax deductions and credits by assessing the adequacy of future expected taxable income from all sources, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, taxable income in carryback years, available tax planning strategies and estimated future taxable income. We recognize net tax-related interest and penalties for continuing operations in income tax expense.
We calculate basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) based on net income, which approximates income available to common shareholders for each period. Basic EPS is calculated using the two-class method, which includes the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period and restricted stock units to be paid in stock that are deemed participating securities as they provide nonforfeitable rights to dividends. Diluted EPS considers the dilutive effect of all potential future common stock, including stock options, restricted stock units and the shares that could be issued upon the conversion of our convertible notes, as discussed below, and upon the exercise of the related warrants. The convertible note call options purchased in connection with the issuance of the convertible notes are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as their impact is always anti-dilutive. Upon conversion of our convertible notes, as described in Note 8, the principal amount would be settled in cash, and the excess of the conversion value, as defined, over the principal amount may be settled in cash and/or shares of our common stock. Therefore, only the shares of our common stock potentially issuable with respect to the excess of the notes’ conversion value over the principal amount, if any, are considered as dilutive potential common shares for purposes of calculating diluted EPS.
We internally assess the quality of our finance receivables held for investment portfolio based on a number of key credit quality indicators and statistics such as delinquency, loan balance to estimated collateral value, the liquidity position of individual borrowers and guarantors and default rates of our notes receivable collateral in the Timeshare product line. For Golf Mortgage, we also utilized debt service coverage prior to the transfer discussed below. Because many of these indicators are difficult to apply across an entire class of receivables, we evaluate individual loans on a quarterly basis and classify these loans into three categories based on the key credit quality indicators for the individual loan. These three categories are performing, watchlist and nonaccrual.
We classify finance receivables held for investment as nonaccrual if credit quality indicators suggest full collection is doubtful. In addition, we automatically classify accounts as nonaccrual that are contractually delinquent by more than three months unless collection is not doubtful. Cash payments on nonaccrual accounts, including finance charges, generally are applied to reduce the net investment balance. We resume the accrual of interest when the loan becomes contractually current through payment according to the original terms of the loan or, if a loan has been modified, following a period of performance under the terms of the modification, provided we conclude that collection of all principal and interest is no longer doubtful. Previously suspended interest income is recognized at that time.
Accounts are classified as watchlist when credit quality indicators have deteriorated as compared with typical underwriting criteria, and we believe collection of full principal and interest is probable but not certain. All other finance receivables held for investment that do not meet the watchlist or nonaccrual categories are classified as performing.
We measure delinquency based on the contractual payment terms of our loans and leases. In determining the delinquency aging category of an account, any/all principal and interest received is applied to the most past-due principal and/or interest amounts due. If a significant portion of the contractually due payment is delinquent, the entire finance receivable balance is reported in accordance with the most past-due delinquency aging category.
We evaluate individual finance receivables held for investment in non-homogeneous portfolios and larger accounts in homogeneous loan portfolios for impairment on a quarterly basis. Finance receivables classified as held for sale are reflected at the lower of cost or fair value and are excluded from these evaluations. A finance receivable is considered impaired when it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement based on our review of the credit quality indicators discussed above. Impaired finance receivables include both nonaccrual accounts and accounts for which full collection of principal and interest remains probable, but the account’s original terms have been, or are expected to be, significantly modified. If the modification specifies an interest rate equal to or greater than a market rate for a finance receivable with comparable risk, the account is not considered impaired in years subsequent to the modification. There was no significant interest income recognized on impaired loans in either 2011 or 2010.
Troubled debt restructurings occur when we have either modified the contract terms of finance receivables held for investment for borrowers experiencing financial difficulties or accepted a transfer of assets in full or partial satisfaction of the loan balance. Modifications often arise in Golf Mortgage and Timeshare as a result of the lack of financing available to borrowers in these industries. Golf Mortgage loans are typically structured with amortization periods between 20 and 30 years and contractual maturities of between 5 and 10 years, resulting in a significant balloon payment. We modify a significant portion of these loans at, or near the maturity date as a result of this structure. The types of modifications we typically make include extensions of the original maturity date of the contract, extensions of revolving borrowing periods, delays in the timing of required principal payments, deferrals of interest payments, advances to protect the value of our collateral and principal reductions contingent on full repayment prior to the maturity date.
Modified finance receivables are classified as impaired loans and are evaluated on an individual basis to determine whether reserves are required. Our reserve evaluation includes an estimate of the likelihood that the borrower will be able to perform under the contractual terms of the modification. Subsequent payment defaults or delinquency trends of finance receivables modified as troubled debt restructurings are also factored into the evaluation of impaired loans for reserving purposes as a default decreases the likelihood that the borrower will be able to perform under the terms of future modifications. In 2011, we had three customer defaults in Timeshare for finance receivables that had been modified as troubled debt restructurings within the previous twelve months; the recorded investment for these customers totaled $113 million, excluding related allowances for doubtful accounts, at the end of 2011.
We may foreclose, repossess or receive collateral when a customer no longer has the ability to make payment. These transfers of assets in full or partial satisfaction of the loan balance are also considered troubled debt restructurings if the fair value of the assets transferred is less than our recorded investment. Similar to the troubled debt restructurings described above, these loans typically have been classified as impaired loans prior to the asset transfer; therefore, reserves have already been established related to the loan. As a result, for 2011, charge-offs of $73 million upon the transfer of such assets were largely offset by previously established reserves.
We measure fair value at the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. We prioritize the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability into a three-tier fair value hierarchy. This fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority (Level 1) to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority (Level 3) to unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exist, requiring companies to develop their own assumptions. Observable inputs that do not meet the criteria of Level 1, and include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active are categorized as Level 2. Level 3 inputs are those that reflect our estimates about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best information available in the circumstances. Valuation techniques for assets and liabilities measured using Level 3 inputs may include methodologies such as the market approach, the income approach or the cost approach and may use unobservable inputs such as projections, estimates and management’s interpretation of current market data. These unobservable inputs are utilized only to the extent that observable inputs are not available or cost-effective to obtain.
Fair value for the Manufacturing group debt is determined using market observable data for similar transactions. At December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, approximately 53% and 33%, respectively, of the fair value of term debt for the Finance group was determined based on observable market transactions. The remaining Finance group debt was determined based on discounted cash flow analyses using observable market inputs from debt with similar duration, subordination and credit default expectations. We utilize the same valuation methodologies to determine the fair value estimates for finance receivables held for investment as used for finance receivables held for sale.
Fair Value Hedges
Our Finance group enters into interest rate exchange contracts to mitigate exposure to changes in the fair value of its fixed-rate receivables and debt due to fluctuations in interest rates. By using these contracts, we are able to convert our fixed-rate cash flows to floating-rate cash flows. The amount of ineffectiveness on our fair value hedges and the gain (loss) recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were both insignificant in 2011 and 2010.
Cash Flow Hedges
We manufacture and sell our products in a number of countries throughout the world, and, therefore, we are exposed to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. The primary purpose of our foreign currency hedging activities is to manage the volatility associated with foreign currency purchases of materials, foreign currency sales of products, and other assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. We primarily utilize forward exchange contracts and purchased options with maturities of no more than three years that qualify as cash flow hedges and are intended to offset the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on forecasted sales, inventory purchases and overhead expenses. At December 31, 2011, we had a net deferred gain of $8 million in Accumulated other comprehensive loss related to these cash flow hedges. Net gains and losses recognized in earnings and Accumulated other comprehensive loss on these cash flow hedges, including gains and losses related to hedge ineffectiveness, were not material in 2011 and 2010. We do not expect the amount of gains and losses in Accumulated other comprehensive loss that will be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months to be material.
Our 2007 Long-Term Incentive Plan (Plan) supersedes the 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan and authorizes awards to our key employees in the form of options to purchase our shares, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance stock awards and other awards. A maximum of 12 million shares is authorized for issuance for all purposes under the Plan plus any shares that become available upon cancellation, forfeiture or expiration of awards granted under the 1999 Long-Term Incentive Plan. No more than 12 million shares may be awarded pursuant to incentive stock options, and no more than 3 million shares may be awarded pursuant to restricted stock units or other awards intended to be paid in shares. The Plan also authorizes performance share units paid in cash based upon the value of our common stock.
Through our Deferred Income Plan for Textron Executives (DIP), we provide Schedule A participants the opportunity to voluntarily defer up to 25% of their base salary and up to 80% of annual, long-term incentive and other compensation. Elective deferrals may be put into either a stock unit account or an interest bearing account. We generally contribute a 10% premium on amounts deferred into the stock unit account. Executives who are eligible to participate in the DIP but have not achieved and/or maintained the required minimum stock ownership level are required to defer part of each subsequent long-term incentive compensation cash payout into the DIP stock unit account until the ownership requirements are satisfied; these deferrals are not entitled to the 10% premium contribution on the amount deferred. Participants cannot move amounts between the two accounts while actively employed by us and cannot receive distributions until termination of employment.
Stock Options
Options to purchase our shares have a maximum term of 10 years and generally vest ratably over a three-year period. The stock option compensation cost calculated under the fair value approach is recognized over the vesting period of the stock options. The weighted-average fair value of options granted per share was $10, $7, and $2 for 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. We estimate the fair value of options granted on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our common stock, historical volatilities and other factors. We use historical data to estimate option exercise behavior, adjusted to reflect anticipated increases in expected life.
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock unit awards generally were payable in shares of common stock (vesting one-third each in the third, fourth and fifth year following the year of the grant), until the first quarter of 2009, when we began issuing restricted stock units settled in cash (vesting in equal installments over five years). In 2011, we issued restricted stock units settled in both cash and stock (vesting in equal installments over five years). Since 2008, all restricted stock units have been issued with the right to receive dividend equivalents. For restricted stock units paid in stock that were issued prior to 2008, the fair value is based on the trading price of our common stock on the grant date, less required adjustments to reflect the fair value of the awards as dividends are not paid or accrued on these units until the restricted stock units vest. For restricted stock units paid in cash and stock that were issued in 2008 and later, the fair value of these units is based solely on the trading price of our common stock on the grant date.
Performance Share Units
The fair value of share-based compensation awards accounted for as liabilities includes performance share units, which are typically paid in cash in the first quarter of the year following vesting. Payouts under performance share units vary based on certain performance criteria generally measured over a three-year period. The performance share units vest at the end of three years. The fair value of these awards is based on the trading price of our common stock, less adjustments to reflect the fair value of certain awards for which dividends are not paid or accrued until vested, and is remeasured at each reporting period date.
Compensation cost for awards subject only to service conditions that vest ratably are recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award. As of December 31, 2011, we had not recognized $45 million of total compensation costs associated with unvested awards subject only to service conditions. We expect to recognize compensation expense for these awards over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.2 years.
The undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries approximated $470 million at December 31, 2011. We consider the undistributed earnings to be indefinitely reinvested; therefore, we have not provided a deferred tax liability for any residual U.S. tax that may be due upon repatriation of these earnings. Because of the effect of U.S. foreign tax credits, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable on these earnings in the event they no longer are indefinitely reinvested.
The amount of income taxes we pay is subject to ongoing audits by U.S. federal, state and non-U.S. tax authorities, which may result in proposed assessments. Our estimate for the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental. We assess our income tax positions and record tax benefits for all years subject to examination based upon management’s evaluation of the facts, circumstances and information available at the reporting date. For those tax positions for which it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, we record the largest amount of tax benefit with a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. Interest and penalties are accrued, where applicable. If we do not believe that it is not more likely than not that a tax benefit will be sustained, no tax benefit is recognized.
Our future results may include favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax liabilities due to settlement of income tax examinations, new regulatory or judicial pronouncements, expiration of statutes of limitations or other relevant events. As a result, our effective tax rate may fluctuate significantly on a quarterly and annual basis.
Our unrecognized tax benefits represent tax positions for which reserves have been established. Unrecognized state tax benefits and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits are reflected net of applicable tax benefits.
We operate in, and report financial information for, the following five business segments: Cessna, Bell, Textron Systems, Industrial and Finance. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1.
|
(In millions) | Cessna | Bell |
Textron Systems |
Industrial | Total | |||||||||||||||
Balance at January 3, 2009 |
$ | 322 | $ | 30 | $ | 956 | $ | 390 | $ | 1,698 | ||||||||||
Impairment |
— | — | — | (80 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
— | — | 2 | — | 2 | |||||||||||||||
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
322 | 30 | 958 | 312 | 1,622 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
— | 1 | 16 | 5 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | (12 | ) | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
322 | 31 | 974 | 305 | 1,632 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
— | — | — | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
— | — | — | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 322 | $ | 31 | $ | 974 | $ | 308 | $ | 1,635 |
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | Weighted- Average Amortization Period (in years) |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||||||||||
Customer agreements and contractual relationships |
15 | $ | 367 | $ | (149 | ) | $ | 218 | $ | 412 | $ | (115 | ) | $ | 297 | |||||||||||||
Patents and technology |
10 | 95 | (59 | ) | 36 | 101 | (53 | ) | 48 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks |
18 | 36 | (19 | ) | 17 | 35 | (16 | ) | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other |
8 | 22 | (16 | ) | 6 | 22 | (15 | ) | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||
$ | 520 | $ | (243 | ) | $ | 277 | $ | 570 | $ | (199 | ) | $ | 371 |
|
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Commercial |
$ 528 | $ | 496 | |||
U.S. Government contracts |
346 | 416 | ||||
874 | 912 | |||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(18) | (20 | ) | |||
$ 856 | $ | 892 |
(In millions) | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Aviation |
$ 1,876 | $ | 2,120 | |||
Golf Equipment |
69 | 212 | ||||
Golf Mortgage |
381 | 876 | ||||
Timeshare |
318 | 894 | ||||
Structured Capital |
208 | 317 | ||||
Other liquidating |
43 | 207 | ||||
Total finance receivables |
2,895 | 4,626 | ||||
Less: Allowance for losses |
156 | 342 | ||||
Less: Finance receivables held for sale |
418 | 413 | ||||
Total finance receivables held for investment, net |
$ 2,321 | $ | 3,871 |
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Installment contracts |
$ 1,816 | $ | 2,130 | |||
Revolving loans |
216 | 501 | ||||
Leveraged leases |
208 | 279 | ||||
Finance leases |
123 | 262 | ||||
Mortgage loans |
60 | 859 | ||||
Distribution finance receivables |
54 | 182 | ||||
$ 2,477 | $ | 4,213 |
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Performing | Watchlist | Nonaccrual | Total | Performing | Watchlist | Nonaccrual | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 1,537 | $ | 214 | $ | 125 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 1,713 | $ | 238 | $ | 169 | $ | 2,120 | ||||||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
21 | 37 | 11 | 69 | 138 | 51 | 23 | 212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
89 | 25 | 167 | 281 | 222 | 77 | 382 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structured Capital |
203 | 5 | — | 208 | 290 | 27 | — | 317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | 163 | 303 | 219 | 685 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
25 | — | 18 | 43 | 130 | 11 | 57 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,875 | $ | 281 | $ | 321 | $ | 2,477 | $ | 2,656 | $ | 707 | $ | 850 | $ | 4,213 | ||||||||||||||||
% of Total |
75.7 | % | 11.3 | % | 13.0 | % | 63.0 | % | 16.8 | % | 20.2 | % |
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Less Than 31 Days Past Due |
31-60 Past Due |
61-90 Past Due |
Over 90 Days Past Due |
Total |
Less Than 31 Days Past Due |
31-60 Past Due |
61-90 Past Due |
Over 90 Days Past Due |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 1,705 | $ | 66 | $ | 37 | $ | 68 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 1,964 | $ | 67 | $ | 41 | $ | 48 | $ | 2,120 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
53 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 69 | 171 | 13 | 9 | 19 | 212 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
238 | 3 | — | 40 | 281 | 533 | 14 | 6 | 128 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Structured Capital |
208 | — | — | — | 208 | 317 | — | — | — | 317 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | — | 543 | 12 | 7 | 123 | 685 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
35 | — | — | 8 | 43 | 166 | 2 | 1 | 29 | 198 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,239 | $ | 72 | $ | 43 | $ | 123 | $ | 2,477 | $ | 3,694 | $ | 108 | $ | 64 | $ | 347 | $ | 4,213 |
Recorded Investment | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Impaired Loans with No Related Allowance for Credit Losses |
Impaired Loans with Related Allowance for Credit Losses |
Total Impaired Loans |
Unpaid Principal Balance |
Allowance For Losses On Impaired Loans |
Average Recorded Investment |
||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 47 | $ | 92 | $ | 139 | $ | 142 | $ | 39 | $ | 146 | ||||||||||||
Timeshare |
170 | 57 | 227 | 288 | 38 | 315 | ||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | — | 232 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
3 | 12 | 15 | 59 | 9 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 220 | $ | 161 | $ | 381 | $ | 489 | $ | 86 | $ | 723 | ||||||||||||
January 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 17 | $ | 147 | $ | 164 | $ | 165 | $ | 45 | $ | 201 | ||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
— | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
69 | 355 | 424 | 459 | 102 | 426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
138 | 175 | 313 | 324 | 39 | 300 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
30 | 16 | 46 | 104 | 3 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 254 | $ | 697 | $ | 951 | $ | 1,057 | $ | 191 | $ | 1,012 |
(Dollars in millions) | Number of Customers |
Pre- Modification |
Post- Modification Asset Balance |
|||||||||
Aviation |
27 | $ | 53 | $ | 32 | |||||||
Golf Mortgage |
5 | 59 | 39 | |||||||||
Timeshare |
2 | 96 | 60 |
(In millions) | Aviation | Golf Equipment |
Golf Mortgage |
Timeshare | Other Liquidating |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
$ | 114 | $ | 9 | $ | 65 | $ | 79 | $ | 74 | $ | 341 | ||||||||||||
Provision for losses |
37 | 14 | 66 | 38 | (12 | ) | 143 | |||||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(44 | ) | (7 | ) | (52 | ) | (7 | ) | (28 | ) | (138 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers |
— | — | — | (4 | ) | — | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
107 | 16 | 79 | 106 | 34 | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for losses |
18 | (3 | ) | 25 | (26 | ) | (2 | ) | 12 | |||||||||||||||
Net charge-offs |
(30 | ) | (4 | ) | (24 | ) | (40 | ) | (4 | ) | (102 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers |
— | (3 | ) | (80 | ) | — | (13 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 95 | $ | 6 | $ | — | $ | 40 | $ | 15 | $ | 156 |
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance Receivables Evaluated | Allowance Based on Individual Evaluation |
Allowance Based on Collective Evaluation |
Finance Receivables Evaluated | Allowance Based on Individual Evaluation |
Allowance Based on Collective Evaluation |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Individually | Collectively | Total | Individually | Collectively | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aviation |
$ | 139 | $ | 1,737 | $ | 1,876 | $ | 39 | $ | 56 | $ | 164 | $ | 1,956 | $ | 2,120 | $ | 45 | $ | 62 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Equipment |
2 | 67 | 69 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 208 | 212 | 2 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Timeshare |
227 | 54 | 281 | 38 | 2 | 424 | 257 | 681 | 102 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Golf Mortgage |
— | — | — | — | — | 313 | 372 | 685 | 39 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liquidating |
15 | 28 | 43 | 9 | 6 | 41 | 195 | 236 | 3 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 383 | $ | 1,886 | $ | 2,269 | $ | 87 | $ | 69 | $ | 946 | $ | 2,988 | $ | 3,934 | $ | 191 | $ | 151 |
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Installment contracts |
$ 1,488 | $ | 1,652 | |||
Finance leases |
121 | 220 | ||||
Distribution finance receivables |
8 | 18 | ||||
Total |
$ 1,617 | $ | 1,890 |
|
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Finished goods |
$ 1,012 | $ | 784 | |||
Work in process |
2,202 | 2,125 | ||||
Raw materials and components |
399 | 506 | ||||
3,613 | 3,415 | |||||
Progress/milestone payments |
(1,211) | (1,138 | ) | |||
$ 2,402 | $ | 2,277 |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
Useful Lives (in years) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
|||||||
Land and buildings |
4 –40 | $ | 1,502 | $ | 1,453 | |||||
Machinery and equipment |
1 –15 | 3,591 | 3,348 | |||||||
5,093 | 4,801 | |||||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(3,097 | ) | (2,869 | ) | ||||||
$ | 1,996 | $ | 1,932 |
|
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
Customer deposits |
$ 729 | $ | 715 | |||
Salaries, wages and employer taxes |
282 | 275 | ||||
Current portion of warranty and product maintenance contracts |
198 | 242 | ||||
Deferred revenues |
169 | 161 | ||||
Retirement plans |
80 | 82 | ||||
Other |
494 | 541 | ||||
Total accrued liabilities |
$ 1,952 | $ | 2,016 |
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
Accrual at beginning of year |
$ | 242 | $ | 263 | $ | 278 | ||||||
Provision |
223 | 189 | 174 | |||||||||
Settlements |
(223 | ) | (231 | ) | (217 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments to prior accrual estimates* |
(18 | ) | 21 | 28 | ||||||||
Accrual at end of year |
$ | 224 | $ | 242 | $ | 263 |
|
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||||
Manufacturing group |
||||||||
Long-term senior debt: |
||||||||
Medium-term notes due 2011 (weighted-average rate of 9.83%) |
$ | — | $ | 13 | ||||
6.50% due 2012 |
139 | 154 | ||||||
3.875% due 2013 |
308 | 315 | ||||||
4.50% convertible senior notes due 2013 |
195 | 504 | ||||||
6.20% due 2015 |
350 | 350 | ||||||
4.625% due 2016 |
250 | — | ||||||
5.60% due 2017 |
350 | 350 | ||||||
7.25% due 2019 |
250 | 250 | ||||||
6.625% due 2020 |
231 | 231 | ||||||
5.95% due 2021 |
250 | — | ||||||
Other (weighted-average rate of 3.72% and 3.12%, respectively) |
136 | 135 | ||||||
2,459 | 2,302 | |||||||
Less: Current portion of long-term debt |
(146 | ) | (19 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
2,313 | 2,283 | ||||||
Total Manufacturing group debt |
$ | 2,459 | $ | 2,302 | ||||
Finance group |
||||||||
Medium-term fixed-rate and variable-rate notes*: |
||||||||
Due 2011 (weighted-average rate of 3.07%) |
$ | — | $ | 374 | ||||
Due 2012 (weighted-average rate of 4.43% and 4.43%, respectively) |
52 | 52 | ||||||
Due 2013 (weighted-average rate of 4.50% and 4.46%, respectively) |
553 | 553 | ||||||
Due 2014 (weighted-average rate of 5.07% and 5.07%, respectively) |
111 | 111 | ||||||
Due 2015 (weighted-average rate of 2.50% and 3.59%, respectively) |
37 | 14 | ||||||
Due 2016 (weighted-average rate of 1.94% and 4.59%, respectively |
43 | 10 | ||||||
Due 2017 and thereafter (weighted-average rate of 2.86% and 3.31%, respectively) |
387 | 242 | ||||||
Credit line borrowings due 2012 (weighted-average rate 0.91%) |
— | 1,440 | ||||||
Securitized debt (weighted-average rate of 2.08% and 2.01%, respectively) |
469 | 530 | ||||||
6% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Notes |
300 | 300 | ||||||
Fair value adjustments and unamortized discount |
22 | 34 | ||||||
Total Finance group debt |
$ | 1,974 | $ | 3,660 |
* Variable-rate notes totaled approximately $100 million and $271 million at December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011, respectively.
(In millions) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
$ | 146 | $ | 532 | $ | 6 | $ | 356 | $ | 256 | ||||||||||
Finance group |
196 | 693 | 232 | 169 | 105 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 342 | $ | 1,225 | $ | 238 | $ | 525 | $ | 361 |
|
Asset (Liability) | ||||||||||||
(In millions) | Borrowing Group | Balance Sheet Location |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Interest rate exchange contracts* |
Finance | Other assets | $ 22 | $ | 34 | |||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
Manufacturing | Other current assets | 9 | 39 | ||||||||
Total |
$ 31 | $ | 73 | |||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Interest rate exchange contracts* |
Finance | Other liabilities | $ (7) | $ | (6 | ) | ||||||
Foreign currency exchange contracts |
Manufacturing | Accrued liabilities | (5) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Total |
$ (12) | $ | (8 | ) |
Balance at | Gain (Loss) | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
Finance group |
||||||||||||||||
Impaired finance receivables |
$ | 81 | $ | 504 | $ | (82 | ) | $ | (148 | ) | ||||||
Finance receivables held for sale |
418 | 413 | (206 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets |
128 | 149 | (49 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
15 | — | (41 | ) | — |
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
Carrying Value |
Estimated Fair Value |
||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt, excluding leases |
$ | (2,328 | ) | $ | (2,561 | ) | $ | (2,172 | ) | $ | (2,698 | ) | ||||
Finance group |
||||||||||||||||
Finance receivables held for investment, excluding leases |
1,997 | 1,848 | 3,345 | 3,131 | ||||||||||||
Debt |
(1,974 | ) | (1,854 | ) | (3,660 | ) | (3,528 | ) |
|
Restructuring Program | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Severance Costs |
Curtailment Charges, Net |
Asset Impairments |
Contract Terminations |
Total Restructuring |
Other Charges |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 34 | $ | — | $ | 6 | $ | 3 | $ | 43 | $ | — | $ | 43 | ||||||||||||||
Finance |
7 | — | 1 | 3 | 11 | 91 | 102 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
1 | — | — | — | 1 | — | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
5 | — | 9 | 1 | 15 | — | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bell |
10 | — | — | — | 10 | — | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
19 | — | — | — | 19 | — | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 76 | $ | — | $ | 16 | $ | 7 | $ | 99 | $ | 91 | $ | 190 | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 80 | $ | 26 | $ | 54 | $ | 7 | $ | 167 | $ | — | $ | 167 | ||||||||||||||
Finance |
11 | 1 | — | 1 | 13 | — | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
34 | — | — | 1 | 35 | — | 35 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
6 | (4 | ) | — | 3 | 5 | 80 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bell |
9 | — | — | — | 9 | — | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
5 | 2 | — | 1 | 8 | — | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 145 | $ | 25 | $ | 54 | $ | 13 | $ | 237 | $ | 80 | $ | 317 | |||||||||||||||
|
(In millions) | Severance Costs |
Curtailment Charges, Net |
Asset Impairment |
Contract Terminations |
Total | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 3, 2009 |
$ | 36 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1 | $ | 37 | ||||||||||
Provision in 2009 |
152 | 25 | 54 | 13 | 244 | |||||||||||||||
Reversals |
(7 | ) | — | — | — | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-cash settlement and loss recognition |
— | (25 | ) | (54 | ) | — | (79 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash paid |
(133 | ) | — | — | (11 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 2, 2010 |
48 | — | — | 3 | 51 | |||||||||||||||
Provision in 2010 |
79 | — | 16 | 7 | 102 | |||||||||||||||
Reversals |
(3 | ) | — | — | — | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-cash settlement |
— | — | (16 | ) | — | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash paid |
(67 | ) | — | — | (5 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2011 |
57 | — | — | 5 | 62 | |||||||||||||||
Cash paid |
(42 | ) | — | — | (2 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 15 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | 18 | ||||||||||
|
|
Pension Benefits |
Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 129 | $ | 124 | $ | 116 | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
327 | 328 | 323 | 33 | 34 | 38 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(393 | ) | (385 | ) | (404 | ) | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
16 | 16 | 18 | (8 | ) | (4 | ) | (5) | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
75 | 41 | 10 | 11 | 11 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment and special termination charges |
(1 | ) | 2 | 34 | — | — | (5) | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 153 | $ | 126 | $ | 97 | $ | 44 | $ | 49 | $ | 44 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in OCI, including foreign exchange |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
$ | (75 | ) | $ | (41 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | (8) | |||||||
Net loss (gain) arising during the year |
556 | 171 | (58 | ) | (17 | ) | — | 24 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service credit (cost) |
(16 | ) | (16 | ) | (48 | ) | 8 | 4 | 10 | |||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) arising during the year |
7 | 5 | 26 | (23 | ) | (16 | ) | 2 | ||||||||||||||||
Curtailments and settlements |
1 | (1 | ) | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognized in OCI |
$ | 473 | $ | 118 | $ | (90 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | 28 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and OCI |
$ | 626 | $ | 244 | $ | 7 | $ | 1 | $ | 26 | $ | 72 | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions) | Pension Benefits |
Postretirement Other than |
||||||
|
||||||||
Net loss |
$ | 117 | $ | 7 | ||||
Prior service cost (credit) |
16 | (11) | ||||||
|
||||||||
$ | 133 | $ | (4) | |||||
|
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation |
||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ | 5,877 | $ | 5,470 | $ | 614 | $ | 646 | ||||||||
Service cost |
129 | 124 | 8 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost |
327 | 328 | 33 | 34 | ||||||||||||
Amendments |
7 | 5 | (23 | ) | (16) | |||||||||||
Plan participants’ contributions |
— | — | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Actuarial losses (gains) |
331 | 292 | (17 | ) | — | |||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(339 | ) | (330 | ) | (59 | ) | (63) | |||||||||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
(7 | ) | (10 | ) | — | — | ||||||||||
Curtailments |
— | (2 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
$ | 6,325 | $ | 5,877 | $ | 561 | $ | 614 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Change in fair value of plan assets |
||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
$ | 4,559 | $ | 4,005 | ||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
167 | 505 | ||||||||||||||
Employer contributions |
628 | 390 | ||||||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(339 | ) | (330 | ) | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange rate changes |
(3 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||
Settlements and disbursements |
1 | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
$ | 5,013 | $ | 4,559 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Funded status at end of year |
$ | (1,312 | ) | $ | (1,318 | ) | $ | (561 | ) | $ | (614) | |||||
|
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
$ | 54 | $ | 58 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Current liabilities |
(23 | ) | (22 | ) | (56 | ) | (60) | |||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
(1,343 | ) | (1,354 | ) | (505 | ) | (554) | |||||||||
Recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive loss, pre-tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
2,455 | 1,977 | 91 | 120 | ||||||||||||
Prior service cost (credit) |
129 | 138 | (50 | ) | (35) | |||||||||||
|
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||
Projected benefit obligation |
$ | 6,153 | $ | 5,706 | ||||
Accumulated benefit obligation |
5,784 | 5,288 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
4,786 | 4,329 |
Pension Benefits | Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate |
5.71% | 6.20% | 6.61% | 5.50% | 5.50% | 6.25% | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
7.84% | 8.26% | 8.58% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase |
3.99% | 4.00% | 4.36% | |||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligations at year-end |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate |
4.95% | 5.71% | 6.19% | 4.75% | 5.50% | 5.50% | ||||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increases |
3.49% | 3.99% | 4.00% | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
|
||||||||
Medical cost trend rate |
9% | 8% | ||||||
Prescription drug cost trend rate |
9% | 9% | ||||||
Rate to which medical and prescription drug cost trend rates will gradually decline |
5% | 5% | ||||||
Year that the rates reach the rate where we assume they will remain |
2021 | 2020 | ||||||
|
(In millions) |
One-
Percentage- |
One- Percentage- Point Decrease |
||||||
|
||||||||
Effect on total of service and interest cost components |
$ | 4 | $ | (3) | ||||
Effect on postretirement benefit obligations other than pensions |
40 | (35) | ||||||
|
|
||
U.S. Plan Assets |
||
Domestic equity securities |
27 % to 41% | |
International equity securities |
11% to 22% | |
Debt securities |
26% to 34% | |
Private equity partnerships |
5% to 11% | |
Real estate |
9% to 15% | |
Hedge funds |
0% to 7% | |
Foreign Plan Assets |
||
Equity securities |
25% to 70% | |
Debt securities |
30% to 60% | |
Real estate |
3% to 17% | |
|
December 31, 2011 | January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 14 | $ | 183 | $ | — | $ | 3 | $ | 178 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
1,017 | 482 | — | 1,052 | 469 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
International |
777 | 233 | — | 688 | 251 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
National, state and local governments |
630 | 254 | — | 39 | 570 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate debt |
34 | 494 | — | 10 | 432 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Asset-backed securities |
3 | 74 | — | 2 | 103 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Private equity partnerships |
— | — | 314 | — | — | 324 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate |
— | — | 407 | — | — | 337 | ||||||||||||||||||
Hedge funds |
— | — | 97 | — | — | 101 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,475 | $ | 1,720 | $ | 818 | $ | 1,794 | $ | 2,003 | $ | 762 | ||||||||||||
|
(In millions) | Hedge Funds | Private Equity Partnerships |
Real Estate | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 101 | $ | 324 | $ | 337 | ||||||
Actual return on plan assets: |
||||||||||||
Related to assets still held at reporting date |
(4 | ) | 7 | 32 | ||||||||
Related to assets sold during the period |
— | 31 | 2 | |||||||||
Purchases, sales and settlements, net |
— | (48 | ) | 36 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 97 | $ | 314 | $ | 407 | ||||||
|
(In millions) | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017-2012 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension benefits |
$ | 340 | $ | 347 | $ | 352 | $ | 358 | $ | 365 | $ | 1,957 | ||||||||||||
Post-retirement benefits other than pensions |
58 | 55 | 54 | 52 | 50 | 214 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected Medicare Part D Subsidy |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | — | — | — | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
U.S. |
$ | 137 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | (229) | |||||
Non-U.S. |
200 | 149 | 80 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Total income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 337 | $ | 86 | $ | (149) | ||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Current: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (23 | ) | $ | (79 | ) | $ | 160 | ||||
State |
15 | 3 | 17 | |||||||||
Non-U.S. |
29 | 19 | (8) | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
21 | (57 | ) | 169 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Deferred: |
||||||||||||
Federal |
67 | 59 | (238) | |||||||||
State |
1 | (5 | ) | (22) | ||||||||
Non-U.S. |
6 | (3 | ) | 15 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
74 | 51 | (245) | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
$ | 95 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (76) | |||||
|
|
||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Federal statutory income tax rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | (35.0)% | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in taxes resulting from: |
||||||||||||
State income taxes |
3.1 | (2.7 | ) | 0.4 | ||||||||
Non-U.S. tax rate differential and foreign tax credits |
(9.4 | ) | (60.5 | ) | (13.5) | |||||||
Unrecognized tax benefits and interest |
1.2 | 17.5 | (4.1) | |||||||||
Nondeductible healthcare claims |
— | 12.7 | — | |||||||||
Change in status of subsidiaries |
— | 12.0 | (3.6) | |||||||||
Research credit |
(2.5 | ) | (5.4 | ) | (4.7) | |||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
(1.5 | ) | (5.1 | ) | (1.9) | |||||||
Valuation allowance on contingent receipts |
— | (2.0 | ) | (7.3) | ||||||||
Goodwill impairment |
— | — | 18.5 | |||||||||
Other, net |
2.2 | (7.9 | ) | 0.2 | ||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Effective rate |
28.1 | % | (6.4 | )% | (51.0)% | |||||||
|
|
||||||
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
|
||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ 285 | $ | 294 | |||
Additions for tax positions related to current year |
8 | 7 | ||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
8 | 8 | ||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
(7) | (17) | ||||
Reductions for expiration of statute of limitations |
— | (5) | ||||
Reductions for settlements with tax authorities |
— | (2) | ||||
|
||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ 294 | $ | 285 | |||
|
|
||||||||
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||||
|
||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
||||||||
Obligation for pension and postretirement benefits |
$ | 635 | $ | 692 | ||||
Deferred compensation |
196 | 203 | ||||||
Accrued expenses* |
193 | 255 | ||||||
Valuation allowance on finance receivables held for sale |
130 | 29 | ||||||
Loss carryforwards |
74 | 66 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
68 | 141 | ||||||
Deferred income |
52 | 59 | ||||||
Inventory |
38 | — | ||||||
Other, net |
172 | 177 | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total deferred tax assets |
1,558 | 1,622 | ||||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets |
(189 | ) | (200) | |||||
|
||||||||
$ | 1,369 | $ | 1,422 | |||||
|
||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
||||||||
Leasing transactions |
$ | (285 | ) | $ | (387) | |||
Property, plant and equipment, principally depreciation |
(145 | ) | (132) | |||||
Amortization of goodwill and other intangibles |
(111 | ) | (135) | |||||
Inventory |
— | (15) | ||||||
|
||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(541 | ) | (669) | |||||
|
||||||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ | 828 | $ | 753 | ||||
|
|
||||||
(In millions) |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||
|
||||||
Current |
$ 288 | $ | 290 | |||
Non-current |
532 | 571 | ||||
|
||||||
820 | 861 | |||||
Finance group’s net deferred tax asset (liability) |
8 | (108) | ||||
|
||||||
Net deferred tax asset |
$ 828 | $ | 753 | |||
|
(In millions) | ||||
|
||||
Non-U.S. net operating loss with no expiration |
$ | 98 | ||
Non-U.S. net operating loss expiring through 2031 |
45 | |||
State net operating loss and tax credits, net of tax benefits, expiring through 2027 |
36 | |||
U.S. federal tax credits beginning to expire in 2021 |
30 | |||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Interest paid: |
||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
$ | 135 | $ | 145 | $ | 116 | ||||||
Finance group |
89 | 127 | 171 | |||||||||
Taxes paid, net of refunds received: |
||||||||||||
Manufacturing group |
30 | 59 | 49 | |||||||||
Finance group |
(65 | ) | 101 | (75) | ||||||||
Discontinued operations |
— | 2 | 156 | |||||||||
|
|
Revenues | Segment Profit (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 2,990 | $ | 2,563 | $ | 3,320 | $ | 60 | $ | (29 | ) | $ | 198 | |||||||||||
Bell |
3,525 | 3,241 | 2,842 | 521 | 427 | 304 | ||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
1,872 | 1,979 | 1,899 | 141 | 230 | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
2,785 | 2,524 | 2,078 | 202 | 162 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance |
103 | 218 | 361 | (333 | ) | (237 | ) | (294) | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,275 | $ | 10,525 | $ | 10,500 | 591 | 553 | 475 | ||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Special charges |
— | (190 | ) | (317) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate expenses and other, net |
(114 | ) | (137 | ) | (164) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net for Manufacturing group |
(140 | ) | (140 | ) | (143) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 337 | $ | 86 | $ | (149) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
Fixed-wing aircraft |
$ | 2,990 | $ | 2,563 | $ | 3,320 | ||||||
Rotor aircraft |
3,525 | 3,241 | 2,842 | |||||||||
Unmanned aircraft systems, armored security vehicles, precision weapons and other |
1,872 | 1,979 | 1,899 | |||||||||
Fuel systems and functional components |
1,823 | 1,640 | 1,287 | |||||||||
Powered tools, testing and measurement equipment |
402 | 330 | 300 | |||||||||
Golf and turf-care products |
560 | 554 | 491 | |||||||||
Finance |
103 | 218 | 361 | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||
$ | 11,275 | $ | 10,525 | $ | 10,500 | |||||||
|
Assets | Capital Expenditures | Depreciation and Amortization | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cessna |
$ | 2,078 | $ | 2,294 | $ | 101 | $ | 47 | $ | 65 | $ | 109 | $ | 106 | $ | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
Bell |
2,247 | 2,079 | 184 | 123 | 101 | 95 | 92 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Textron Systems |
1,948 | 1,997 | 37 | 41 | 31 | 85 | 81 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial |
1,664 | 1,604 | 94 | 51 | 38 | 72 | 72 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance |
3,213 | 4,949 | — | — | — | 32 | 31 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate |
2,465 | 2,359 | 7 | 8 | 3 | 10 | 11 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 13,615 | $ | 15,282 | $ | 423 | $ | 270 | $ | 238 | $ | 403 | $ | 393 | $ | 409 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Revenues* | Property, Plant and Equipment, net** |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 7,138 | $ | 6,688 | $ | 6,563 | $ | 1,557 | $ | 1,565 | ||||||||||
Europe |
1,577 | 1,448 | 1,625 | 236 | 220 | |||||||||||||||
Canada |
289 | 347 | 344 | 100 | 89 | |||||||||||||||
Latin America and Mexico |
820 | 815 | 815 | 36 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Asia and Australia |
1,032 | 776 | 553 | 76 | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Middle East and Africa |
419 | 451 | 600 | — | — | |||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 11,275 | $ | 10,525 | $ | 10,500 | $ | 2,005 | $ | 1,948 | |||||||||||
|
* Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the customer.
** Property, plant and equipment, net are based on the location of the asset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|