| Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Unless otherwise noted in this report, any description of "we", "us" or "our" includes Molson Coors Brewing Company ("MCBC" or the "Company"), principally a holding company, and its operating subsidiaries: Coors Brewing Company ("CBC"), operating in the United States ("U.S.") until June 30, 2008 when MCBC and SABMiller plc ("SABMiller") combined the U.S. and Puerto Rico operations of their respective subsidiaries, CBC and Miller Brewing Company ("Miller") and the results and financial position of U.S. operations, which comprise substantially all of our U.S. reporting segment were, in all material respects, deconsolidated from MCBC prospectively upon formation of MillerCoors LLC ("MillerCoors"), see Note 4, "Investments"; Molson Coors Brewing Company (UK) Limited ("MCBC-UK"), formerly referred to as Coors Brewers Limited ("CBL"), operating in the United Kingdom ("U.K."); Molson Coors Canada ("MCC"), formerly referred to as Molson Canada ("Molson"), operating in Canada; and our other entities. Any reference to "Coors" means the Adolph Coors Company prior to the 2005 merger with Molson Inc. (the "Merger"). Any reference to Molson Inc. or Molson means MCC prior to the Merger. Any reference to "Molson Coors" means MCBC after the Merger. Unless otherwise indicated, information in this report is presented in U.S. dollars ("USD" or "$"). Our Fiscal Year In 2010 and 2009, our fiscal year was a 52 week period ending on the last Saturday in December. Previously, our fiscal year was a 52 or 53 week period ending on the last Sunday in December. The fiscal years ended December 25, 2010, December 26, 2009, and December 28, 2008, were 52 week periods. In 2011, our fiscal year will have 53 weeks, ending on December 31, 2011. Principles of Consolidation Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and our majority-owned and controlled domestic and foreign subsidiaries, as well as certain variable interest entities. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Reporting Periods Presented The results from Brewers' Retail, Inc. ("BRI"), a consolidated subsidiary through February 28, 2009, and an equity method investment thereafter, are reported one month in arrears. Due to a change in our ownership level of BRI, we deconsolidated this entity from our financial statements as of March 1, 2009, and began to prospectively account for it under the equity method of accounting. See Note 4, "Investments" for further information. Use of Estimates Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions used to determine certain amounts that affect the financial statements are reasonable, based on information available at the time they are made. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our consolidated financial statements may be affected. Reclassifications and Retrospective Applications of Changes in Accounting Principles During the first quarter of 2009, we adopted new pronouncements related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements and accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement), both of which required retrospective applications. See discussions in Note 2, "New Accounting Pronouncements." In addition, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we changed the classification of returnable bottles and pallets to noncurrent assets within Properties. Previously, returnable bottles and pallets were classified as current assets within Inventories, Packaging Materials. We have determined that this change in accounting principle is preferable under the circumstances and have applied it retrospectively in accordance with U.S. GAAP. See additional discussion of the accounting treatment under "Properties" below and within Note 11, "Properties." Revenue Recognition Depending upon the method of distribution and shipping terms, revenue is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer or distributor, which is either at the time of shipment to distributors or upon delivery of product to retail customers. In the United Kingdom, excise taxes are included in the purchase price we pay the vendor on beverages for the factored brands business purchased from third parties for resale, and are included in our net sales and cost of goods sold when ultimately sold. The cost of various programs, such as price promotions, rebates and coupon programs are treated as a reduction of sales. Sales of products are for cash or otherwise agreed upon credit terms. Revenue is stated net of incentives, discounts and returns. Outside of unusual circumstances, if product is returned, it is generally for failure to meet our quality standards, not caused by customer actions. Products that do not meet our high quality standards are returned and destroyed. We do not have standard terms that permit return of product. We estimate the costs for product returns and record those costs in cost of goods sold each period. We reduce revenue at the value of the original sales price in the period that the product is returned. Cost of Goods Sold Our cost of goods sold includes raw materials, packaging materials (including promotional packaging), manufacturing costs, plant administrative support and overheads, inbound and outbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing, and internal transfer costs. Equity Method Accounting We generally apply the equity method of accounting to 20% to 50% owned investments where we exercise significant influence, except for certain investments that must be consolidated as variable interest entities. Equity method investments include our equity ownership in MillerCoors in the U.S. and Tradeteam, Ltd ("Tradeteam") (a transportation and logistics services company) in the U.K., along with Modelo Molson Imports, L.P. ("MMI"), BRI, Brewers' Distributor Ltd. ("BDL") and our former interests in the Montréal Canadiens and House of Blues, all in Canada. See Note 4, "Investments." There are no related parties that own interests in our equity method investments as of December 25, 2010. Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses Our marketing, general and administrative expenses consist of advertising, sales costs, non-manufacturing administrative, and overhead costs. The creative portion of our advertising activities is expensed as incurred. Production costs of advertising and promotional materials are generally expensed when the advertising is first run. Advertising expense was $361.6 million, $349.3 million, and $610.0 million for years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Prepaid advertising costs of $13.4 million and $13.9 million, were included in other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, respectively. Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Canada's distribution channels are highly regulated by provincial regulation and experience few collectability problems. However, we do have direct sales to retail customers in Canada for which an allowance is recorded based upon expected collectability and historical experience. Trade Loans The U.K. segment extends loans to a portion of the retail outlets that sell our brands. Some of these loans provide for no interest to be payable, and others provide for payment of a below market interest rate. In return, the retail outlets receive smaller discounts on beer and other beverage products purchased from us, with the net result being the U.K. segment attaining a market return on the outstanding loan balance. We therefore reclassify a portion of beer revenue into interest income to reflect a market rate of interest on these loans. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, these amounts were $6.7 million, $8.3 million, and $10.7 million, respectively and this interest income is included in the U.K. segment. Trade loan receivables are classified as either current notes receivable and other receivables or non-current notes receivable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, total loans outstanding, net of allowances, were $48.4 million and $62.5 million, respectively. An allowance for credit losses is maintained to provide for probable loan losses related to specifically identified loans and for losses inherent in the loan portfolio that have been incurred at the balance sheet date. We establish our allowance through a provision for loan losses charged against earnings and recorded in marketing, general & administrative expenses. In determining the allowance, management analyzes the loan portfolio on an individual loan basis based on monthly performance. The evaluation is based on a review of the collectability of loans considering the nature of the portfolio, historical experience, the borrower's current repayment ability, estimated value of any underlying collateral, returns, risk profile, credit scores obtained from credit rating agencies and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires information related to these factors available at the time. The criteria are applied consistently across the trade loan portfolio and there has been no change to the policy during the year. Further, based on the monthly evaluation of loan performance, if, in management's judgment the review indicates that the loan may not be recoverable, it is classified as delinquent. Loans classified as delinquent are placed under additional scrutiny by management and if deemed uncollectible then they are passed to the company's credit management agency. Interest continues to be accrued on delinquent loans when collectability remains probable and payments received are recorded as a reduction of principal and interest. If after a period of additional scrutiny, in management's judgment the loan is not recoverable, it is written off along with any outstanding interest and any further collected payments are applied to principal. Total delinquent loans at December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009 were $12.5 million and $18.7 million, respectively. Loan balances that are written off are recorded against the allowance as a charge-off. In 2010 and 2009, total loans written off were $6.2 million and $7.7 million, respectively. Any subsequent loan recovery is recorded as a gain upon collection. A rollforward of the allowance for the year ended December 25, 2010 is as follows (in millions):
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. Prior to the formation of MillerCoors, substantially all of the inventories in the United States were determined on the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we reclassified our returnable bottles and pallets from Inventories, Packaging Materials, to Properties as discussed below. We regularly assess the shelf-life of our inventories and reserve for those inventories when it becomes apparent the product will not be sold within our freshness specifications. There were no allowances for obsolete finished goods or packaging materials at December 25, 2010 or at December 26, 2009. Properties Properties are carried at original cost less accumulated depreciation. Certain equipment held under capital lease is classified as equipment and amortized using the straight-line method or estimated useful life, whichever is shorter over the lease term. Lease amortization is included in depreciation expense. Expenditures for new facilities and improvements that substantially extend the capacity or useful life of an asset are capitalized. Start-up costs associated with manufacturing facilities, but not related to construction, are expensed as incurred. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Our returnable containers (including returnable bottles, kegs and pallets) are recorded at acquisition cost and are classified within Properties. Returnable containers consist of returnable bottles, kegs and pallets that are both in our direct control within our breweries, warehouses and distributions facilities and those that we indirectly control in the market through our agreements with our customers and other brewers and for which a deposit is received. The deposits received on the Company's returnable containers in the market are recorded as deposit liabilities, included as current liabilities within Accrued Expenses and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 11, "Properties." Historically our returnable bottles and pallets were classified as current assets within Inventories, Packaging Materials. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we concluded that the classification of our returnable bottles and pallets as noncurrent assets within Properties is a preferable presentation under U.S. GAAP and is more consistent with industry practice and as such we have classified these amounts as Properties in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and adjusted our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows accordingly, reflecting the purchases of returnable bottles and pallets as investing activities. The amounts presented in our historical financial statements have also been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation as follows:
Note that the above changes do not impact the Consolidated Statements of Operations as the expense related to the returnable bottles and pallets has historically been recorded within Costs of goods sold and will continue to be classified as such. Additionally, the amounts presented in our historical quarterly financial statements have also been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation as further discussed in Note 22, "Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)." Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value as recorded due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. In addition, the carrying amounts of our trade loan receivables approximate fair value. The fair value of long-term obligations for derivatives was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using market interest rates, adjusted for non-performance credit risk associated with our counterparties (assets) or with MCBC (liabilities). See Note 18, "Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." Based on current market rates for similar instruments, the fair value of long-term debt is presented in Note 13, "Debt." The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance for fair value, which establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach). We utilize a combination of market and income approaches to value derivative instruments, and use an income approach for valuing our indemnity obligations. Our financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows: Level 1Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are less active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs). Level 3Unobservable inputs that reflect the assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. We develop these inputs based on the best information available, including our own data. Foreign Currency Translation Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies that are the functional currencies for the respective operations are translated at the prevailing exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income. Factored Brands In addition to supplying our own brands, the U.K. segment sells other beverage companies' products to on-premise customers to provide them with a full range of products for their retail outlets. These factored brand sales are included in our financial results, but the related volume is not included in our reported sales volumes. We refer to this as the "factored brand business." In the factored brand business, we normally purchase factored brand inventory, take orders from customers for such brands, and invoice customers for the product and related costs of delivery. In accordance with guidance pertaining to reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent, sales under the factored brands are generally reported on a gross income basis. Goodwill and Other Asset Valuation We evaluate the carrying value of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually, and we evaluate our other tangible and intangible assets for impairment when there is evidence that certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Significant judgments and assumptions are required in such impairment evaluations. We completed the required annual impairment testing as of June 27, 2010, the first day of our fiscal third quarter. See Note 12, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets." Statement of Cash Flows Data Cash equivalents represent highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. The carrying value of these investments approximates their fair value. The following presents our supplemental cash flow information:
See Note 4, "Investments," for a summary of assets and liabilities contributed to MillerCoors, the formation of which was a significant non-cash activity in 2008. |
|
2. New Accounting Pronouncements Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to the consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIEs"), which requires an enterprise to determine whether its variable interests give it a controlling financial interest. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the enterprise that has both (1) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, and (2) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This guidance also requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE requiring consolidation. The guidance was effective for our first quarter ended March 27, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not impact our financial results. See also Note 4, "Investments" for further disclosure of our VIEs. Noncontrolling Interests In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. This guidance requires the recognition of a noncontrolling interest (previously referred to as minority interest) as a component of equity in the consolidated financial statements and separate from the parent's equity. The amount of net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest is included in consolidated net income in the consolidated statement of operations. It also amends existing guidance to be consistent with the revised guidance for business combinations including procedures associated with the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. As such, our adoption of this guidance on December 28, 2008 impacted the accounting for the deconsolidation of BRI in the first quarter of 2009. Changes to noncontrolling interests reflected in total equity during 2009 resulted from $2.8 million of net earnings, establishment of the non-controlling interest in Cobra Beer Partnership Ltd of $9.6 million, and the effects of deconsolidating BRI ($19.7 million). Changes to the individual components of accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests were insignificant. This guidance also includes expanded disclosure requirements regarding the interests of the parent and its noncontrolling interest. See Note 4, "Investments" for further discussion. Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments In May 2008, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to accounting for convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) that applies to all convertible debt instruments that have a "net settlement feature", which means that such convertible debt instruments, by their terms, may be settled either wholly or partially in cash upon conversion. This guidance requires issuers of convertible debt instruments that may be settled wholly or partially in cash upon conversion to separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner reflective of the issuers' nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The Company retrospectively adopted this guidance in 2008, impacting historical accounting for our 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes due July 30, 2013 ("Convertible Senior Notes"). See Note 13, "Debt" for further discussion. New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted Goodwill Impairment Analysis In December 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to the evaluation of Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, which requires an entity to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. Upon adoption of the guidance, an entity with reporting units that have carrying amounts that are zero or negative is required to assess whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units' goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines that it is more likely than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units is impaired, the entity should perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test for those reporting units. The guidance is effective for our first quarter ending March 26, 2011. We are currently evaluating the impact that this guidance may have on the determination or reporting of our financial results. |
|
3. Segment Reporting Our reporting segments are based on the key geographic regions in which we operate, which are the basis on which our chief operating decision maker evaluates the performance of the business. The Company operates in the reporting segments listed below. Reportable segments Canada The Canada segment consists of our production, marketing and sales of the Molson family of brands, Coors Light and other brands, principally in Canada; and BRI, our joint venture arrangement related to the distribution and retail sale of beer in Ontario and BDL, our joint venture arrangement related to the distribution of beer in the western provinces, both accounted for as equity method investments. The Canada segment also includes our equity interest in Modelo Molson Imports, L.P ("MMI"), our joint venture with Grupo Modelo S.A.B. de C.V. ("Modelo"). We have an agreement with Heineken N.V. ("Heineken") that grants us the right to import, market, and sell Heineken products throughout Canada and with SABMiller to brew, market, and sell several SABMiller brands, and to distribute and sell imported SABMiller brands. We also contract brew and package Asahi for the U.S. market. United States (U.S.) As discussed in Note 1, "Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," effective July 1, 2008, MillerCoors began operations. The results and financial position of our U.S. segment operations were deconsolidated upon contribution to the joint venture, and our interest in MillerCoors is being accounted for and reported by us under the equity method of accounting. MCBC's equity investment in MillerCoors represents our U.S. segment beginning July 1, 2008. United Kingdom (U.K.) The U.K. segment consists of our production, marketing and sales of our brands (the largest of which is Carling), principally in the U.K.; our consolidated joint venture relating to the production and distribution of the Grolsch brands in the U.K. and the Republic of Ireland; our consolidated joint venture to produce and distribute the Cobra beer brands in the U.K.; factored brand sales (beverage brands owned by other companies, but sold and delivered to retail by us), in the U.K.; and our equity method joint venture arrangement ("Tradeteam") for the physical distribution of products throughout Great Britain. Non-reportable segment and other business activities Molson Coors International ("MCI") and Corporate MCI includes results of operations in our non-core and developing markets, including Asia, Mexico, the Caribbean (not including Puerto Rico) and continental Europe. This includes our venture agreement in China with Hebei Si'hai Beer Company, Molson Coors Si'hai Brewing (China) Co., Ltd. ("MC-Si'hai"). Corporate includes interest and certain other general and administrative costs that are not allocated to any of the operating segments. The majority of these corporate costs relate to worldwide administrative functions, such as corporate affairs, legal, human resources, accounting, treasury, insurance and risk management. Corporate also includes certain royalty income and administrative costs related to the management of intellectual property. Summarized financial information No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our sales. Net sales represent sales to third party external customers. Inter-segment sales revenues other than sales to MillerCoors are insignificant and eliminated in consolidation. The following tables represent consolidated net sales, consolidated interest expense, consolidated interest income, and reconciliations of amount shown as income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes to income from continuing operations attributable to MCBC.
The following table presents total assets by segment:
The following table presents cash flow information by segment:
The following table presents sales by geographic segment:
The following table presents properties by geographic segment:
|
|
4. Investments The investments included within this Note 4 include both equity method and consolidated investments. Those entities identified as VIEs have been evaluated to determine whether we are the primary beneficiary. The VIEs included under Equity Investments are those for which we have concluded that we are not the primary beneficiary and accordingly, we account for these investments under the equity method of accounting. The VIEs included under Consolidated Investments are those for which we have concluded that we are the primary beneficiary and accordingly, consolidate these entities. We have not provided any financial support to any of our VIEs during the year that we were not previously contractually obligated to provide. Authoritative guidance related to the consolidation of VIEs requires that we continually reassess whether we are the primary beneficiary of VIEs in which we have an interest. As such, the conclusion regarding the primary beneficiary status is subject to change and we continually evaluate circumstances that could require a change to our current accounting treatment. Equity Investments Investment in MillerCoors MillerCoors has a Board of Directors consisting of five MCBC-appointed and five SABMiller-appointed directors. The percentage interests in the profits of MillerCoors are 58% for SABMiller and 42% for MCBC, and voting interests are shared 50%-50%. Each party to the joint venture has agreed not to transfer its economic or voting interests in the joint venture for a period of five years, and certain rights of first refusal will apply to any subsequent assignment of such interests. Our interest in MillerCoors is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The following table is a summary of the carrying values of net assets that we contributed to MillerCoors on July 1, 2008 (in millions):
Summarized financial information for MillerCoors is as follows (in millions): Condensed balance sheet
Results of operations
The following represents MCBC's proportional share in MillerCoors of net income reported under the equity method (in millions):
During the year ended December 25, 2010, we recorded $35.1 million and $9.3 million of sales of beer to MillerCoors and purchase of beer from MillerCoors, respectively. In addition, we recorded $4.1 million of service agreement and other charges to MillerCoors and $1.2 million of service agreement costs from MillerCoors. As of December 25, 2010, we had $1.3 million due from MillerCoors related to activities mentioned above. During the year ended December 26, 2009, we recorded $38.1 million and $10.6 million of sales of beer to MillerCoors and purchase of beer from MillerCoors, respectively. In addition, we recorded $12.7 million of service agreement and other charges to MillerCoors and $1.6 million of service agreement costs from MillerCoors. As of December 26, 2009, we had $5.4 million due from MillerCoors related to activities mentioned above. During the twenty-six weeks ended December 28, 2008, we recorded $51.3 million and $2.9 million of sales of beer to MillerCoors and purchase of beer from MillerCoors, respectively. In addition, we recorded $5.8 million of service agreement charges to MillerCoors and $0.6 million of service agreement costs from MillerCoors. MCBC assigned the United States and Puerto Rican rights to the legacy Coors brands, including Coors Light, Coors Banquet, Keystone Light and the Blue Moon brands, to MillerCoors. We retained all ownership rights of these brands outside of the United States and Puerto Rico. In addition, we retained numerous water rights in Colorado. We lease these water rights to MillerCoors at no cost for use at their Golden, Colorado brewery. There were no significant undistributed earnings in MillerCoors as of December 25, 2010 or December 26, 2009. All Other Equity Investments Tradeteam Ltd. Tradeteam, a joint venture between us and DHL in which we have a 49.9% interest, has an exclusive contract with us to provide transportation and logistics services in the U.K. until 2018. Our approximate financial commitments under the distribution contract with Tradeteam are as follows:
The financial commitments on termination of the distribution agreement are to essentially take over property, assets and people used by Tradeteam to deliver the service to us, paying Tradeteam's net book value for assets acquired which approximates $40.7 million as of December 25, 2010. Services provided under the Tradeteam contract were approximately $117.6 million, $118.4 million, and $146.6 million for the years ended December 25, 2010, December 26, 2009, and December 28, 2008, respectively. As of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, we had $14.2 million and $10.2 million due to Tradeteam for services provided. Montréal Canadiens Molson Hockey Holdings, Inc. ("MHHI"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, owned a 19.9% indirect common ownership in the Montréal Canadiens professional hockey team, the Gillett Entertainment Group and certain related assets (collectively, the "Club"). An independent party owned the controlling 80.1% common ownership interest in the Club. During the fourth quarter of 2009, CH Group Limited Partnership / Société en commandite Group CH ("CH Group") purchased the controlling 80.1% common ownership interest in the Club, as well as the interest in the ground lease of the Bell Centre arena in Montréal (the "Bell Centre") from the majority owner of the Club, an independent third-party. The general partner of CH Group and one of its limited partners are entities affiliated with Andrew and Geoff Molson, who are both members of the Board of Directors of the Company. In connection with CH Group's purchase of the controlling common ownership interest in the Club and the Bell Centre, effective December 1, 2009, MHHI sold its 19.9% common ownership interest in the Club to CH Group. The Company received net proceeds of CAD 56.3 million ($53.3 million), which is equal to the sale price for the Company's interest reduced by a portion of the debt obligations of the Club assumed by the CH Group, and recognized a gain of CAD 48.7 million ($46.0 million) related to this transaction. The selling price of our interest in the Club was based on the price at which CH Group purchased the 80.1% controlling interest in the Club from the majority owner, an independent third party. As part of its ownership of the Club, the Company was historically obligated under two principal financial guarantees: a consent agreement with the NHL (the "Consent Agreement"), which required the direct and indirect owners of the Club to abide by certain funding requirements related to the ownership of the Club, including those provided in a shareholders' agreement; and a guarantee of the Club's majority owner's obligations under a ground lease for the Bell Centre (the "Ground Lease Guarantee"). In connection with the sale of our common ownership interest in the Club, we were released from our obligations under the Consent Agreement, but remain obligated under the Ground Lease Guarantee. However, CH Group agreed to indemnify the Company in connection with the liabilities we may incur under the Ground Lease Guarantee and provided the Company with a CAD 10 million ($9.5 million) letter of credit to guarantee such indemnity. This transaction did not materially affect our risk exposure related to the Ground Lease Guarantee, which continues to be recognized as a liability on our balance sheet. The gain that we recognized on the sale of our common ownership interest in the Club reflects the release of a CAD 4.5 million ($4.3 million) liability associated with the Consent Agreement. Brewers' Retail Inc. BRI, a VIE, is a beer distribution and retail network for the Ontario region of Canada, owned by MCBC, Anheuser-Busch InBev ("ABI") and Sleeman. BRI operates on a break-even basis. MCBC has historically consolidated BRI as its primary beneficiary. Contractual provisions cause our variable interests to fluctuate requiring frequent evaluations as to primary beneficiary status. Acquisition activity by ABI caused our variable interest to decrease to a level indicating that we are no longer the primary beneficiary and, as such, we deconsolidated BRI from our financial statements during the first quarter of 2009. The deconsolidation does not impact our continuing involvement with BRI, which will remain the same. Further, following the deconsolidation, BRI remains a related party. BRI's liabilities exceeded its assets at the date of deconsolidation (negative book value), by $90.3 million. We recorded a liability of $74.3 million associated with the recognition of the fair value of our proportionate share of the guarantee we maintain with regard to BRI's debt obligations. We determined the fair value of the guarantee based upon our share of BRI's total debt obligation adjusted for nonperformance riskconsidered a level 3 input. Because we have an obligation to proportionately fund BRI's obligations, the difference between net carrying value and the fair value of our retained equity interest in BRI was recorded as an adjustment to our BRI investment, effectively resulting in a negative equity method basis of $16 million. Therefore, no gain was recognized upon deconsolidation. Additionally, because of our continued obligation, we continue to record our proportional share of BRI's net income or loss, despite our negative equity method basis. Administrative fees under the agreement with BRI were approximately $93.9 million and $89.2 million for the years ended December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively. As of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, we had $37.9 million and $44.3 million due from BRI related to services under the administrative fees agreement, respectively. Brewers' Distributor Ltd. BDL, a VIE, is a distribution operation owned by MCBC and ABI (collectively, the "Members") and pursuant to an operating agreement, acts as an agent for the distribution of their products in the western provinces of Canada. The two Members share 50%/50% voting control of this business. BDL charges the Members administrative fees that are designed so the entity operates at break-even profit levels. This administrative fee is based on costs incurred, net of other revenues earned, and is allocated in accordance with the operating agreement to the Members based on volume of products. No other parties are allowed to sell beer through BDL, which does not take legal title to the beer distributed for the Members. Administrative fees under the contract were approximately $38.5 million, $43.9 million, and $52.8 million for the years ended December 25, 2010, December 26, 2009, and December 28, 2008, respectively. As of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, we had $19.9 million and $22.0 million due from BDL, respectively, related to services under the administrative fees agreement. Modelo Molson Imports, L.P. MMI, a 50%/50% joint venture with Modelo, imports, distributes, and markets the Modelo beer brand portfolio across all Canadian provinces and territories. Our sales team is responsible for selling the brands across Canada on behalf of the joint venture. We account for MMI, a VIE, under the equity method of accounting. During 2010, 2009 and 2008, we incurred $12.3 million, $7.6 million and $13.8 million, respectively, of costs payable to MMI. As of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, we had $15.5 million due to and $0.2 million due from MMI, respectively, related to activities under the operating agreement. Summarized financial information for Tradeteam, the Montréal Canadiens, BRI, BDL, and MMI combined is as follows (in millions): Results of operations
Condensed Combined Balance sheets
There were no significant undistributed earnings as of December 25, 2010 or December 26, 2009 for any of the companies included in other equity investments above. Consolidated Variable Interest Entities Rocky Mountain Metal Container Rocky Mountain Metal Container ("RMMC"), a Colorado limited liability company, is a joint venture with Ball Corporation in which MillerCoors holds and consolidates a 50% interest. RMMC produces cans and ends for MillerCoors. Prior to the formation of MillerCoors on July 1, 2008, we held the 50% interest in RMMC and consolidated the results and financial position of RMMC. MCBC remains the guarantor of approximately $32.8 million and $37.4 million of RMMC debt at December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively. Rocky Mountain Bottle Company Rocky Mountain Bottle Company ("RMBC"), a Colorado limited liability company, is a joint venture with Owens-Brockway Glass Container, Inc. in which MillerCoors holds and consolidates a 50% interest. RMBC produces glass bottles at MillerCoors' glass manufacturing facility for use at its Golden and other breweries. Prior to the formation of MillerCoors on July 1, 2008, we held the 50% interest in RMMC and consolidated the results and financial position of RMMC. The results and financial position of RMBC were consolidated in our financial statements during the first half of 2008. Grolsch Grolsch is a joint venture between us and Royal Grolsch N.V. in which we hold a 49% interest. The Grolsch joint venture markets Grolsch branded beer in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland. The majority of the Grolsch branded beer is produced by us under a contract brewing arrangement with the joint venture. MCBC and Royal Grolsch N.V. sell beer to the joint venture, which sells the beer back to MCBC (for onward sale to customers) for a price equal to what it paid, plus a marketing and overhead charge and a profit margin. Grolsch is a taxable entity in the U.K. Accordingly, income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations includes taxes related to the entire income of the joint venture. Cobra Beer Partnership, Ltd During the second quarter of 2009, we purchased 50.1% of Cobra Beer Partnership, Ltd ("CBPL"), which owns the world-wide rights to the Cobra beer brand (with the exception of the Indian sub-continent). The non-controlling interest is held by the founder of the Cobra beer brand. We consolidate the results and financial position of CBPL and it is reported within our U.K. operating segment. We have not presented pro forma information, as the acquisition of CBPL is not material to our results of operations or financial position. The following summarizes the assets and results of operations of our consolidated joint ventures (including noncontrolling interests). None of our consolidated VIEs held debt as of December 25, 2010 or December 26, 2009.
Other Investments Granville Island Brewing Co, Ltd. During the fourth quarter of 2009, we entered into an agreement to acquire Granville Island Brewing Company, Ltd. and Mainland Beverage Distribution Ltd (collectively, "Granville Island"). Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2009, Granville Island was classified as a VIE and was consolidated by us as the primary beneficiary. Pursuant to the agreement entered into in 2009, we acquired 100% of the outstanding stock in the second quarter of 2010 and, as a result, Granville Island is no longer classified as a VIE. We continue to consolidate the results and financial position of Granville Island, and it is reported within our Canada segment. We have not presented pro forma information as the acquisition of Granville Island is not material to our financial position or results of operations. Molson Coors Si'hai Brewing (China) Co., Ltd During the third quarter of 2010, we acquired a controlling 51% interest in MC-Si'hai, a joint venture with the previous owner of the Si'hai beer brand and production facilities, Hebei Si'hai Beer Company. We consolidate the results and financial position of MC-Si'hai, and it is reported within our MCI and Corporate segment. We have not presented pro forma information as the acquisition of MC-Si'hai is not material to our financial position or results of operations. |
|
5. Discontinued Operations In 2006, we sold our entire equity interest in our Brazilian unit, Cervejarias Kaiser Brasil S.A. ("Kaiser"), to FEMSA Cerveza S.A. de C.V. ("FEMSA"). The terms of the sale agreement require us to indemnify FEMSA for exposures related to certain tax, civil and labor contingencies arising prior to FEMSA's purchase of Kaiser (See Note 20, "Commitments and Contingencies"). The table below summarizes the income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, presented on our consolidated statements of operations:
As of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, included in current assets of discontinued operations on the balance sheet are $0.6 million and $9.9 million of deferred tax assets associated with these indemnity liabilities, respectively. Current liabilities of discontinued operations include current legal reserves of $4.4 million and $2.9 million as of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively, and current tax liabilities of $9.9 million as of December 26, 2009. |
|
6. Other Income and Expense
|
|
7. Income Tax The pre-tax income on which the provision for income taxes was computed is as follows:
Income tax expense (benefit) includes the following current and deferred provisions:
Our income tax expense varies from the amount expected by applying the statutory federal corporate tax rate to income as follows:
Our deferred taxes are composed of the following:
Our full year effective tax rate was approximately 17% in 2010, -2% in 2009, and 19% in 2008. Our effective tax rates were significantly lower than the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to the impact of lower effective income tax rates applicable to our Canadian and U.K. businesses. Our 2009 effective tax rate was unusually low due to the favorable resolution of unrecognized tax positions during 2009, which reduced our effective tax rate by 18.8%. The Company has U.S. federal and state net operating losses and foreign tax credit carryforwards. The tax effect of these attributes is $4.3 million at December 25, 2010, and $24.9 million at December 26, 2009, which will expire between 2011 and 2031. The measurement of deferred tax assets is reduced by a valuation allowance if, based upon available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. As a result, The Company has established a valuation allowance in the amount of $1.0 million and $1.0 million at December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, respectively. In addition, the Company has Canadian federal and provincial net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards. The tax effect of these attributes is $72.2 million at December 25, 2010 and $11.1 million at December 26, 2009. The Canadian loss carryforwards will expire between 2013 and 2030. The Company believes, based upon available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, and has established a valuation allowance in the amount of $1.8 million and $1.9 million at December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively. In addition, the Company has U.K. capital loss carryforwards. The tax effect of these attributes was $8.7 million at December 25, 2010 and $9.4 million at December 26, 2009. The U.K. capital loss carryforwards do not expire. Annual tax provisions include amounts considered sufficient to pay assessments that may result from examination of prior year tax returns; however, the amount ultimately paid upon resolution of issues may differ materially from the amount accrued. As of December 26, 2009, we had $71.5 million of unrecognized tax benefits. Since December 26, 2009, unrecognized tax benefits increased by $12.6 million. This increase represents the net of increases due to fluctuation in foreign exchange rates, additional unrecognized tax benefits, accrued penalties, and interest accrued for the current year, and decreases primarily due to tax years closing or being effectively settled and payments made to tax authorities with regard to unrecognized tax benefits during 2010, resulting in total unrecognized tax benefits of $84.1 million as of December 25, 2010. If recognized, the full amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate as of December 25, 2010 compared with $71.5 million as of December 26, 2009. During 2011, the Company does not expect any significant increases or decreases to unrecognized tax benefits. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Anticipated interest and penalty payments of $8.4 million and $5.8 million were accrued in unrecognized tax benefits as of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively. We recognized an income tax expense of $2.6 million and income tax benefit of $29.3 million for the net increase and net reduction of interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits as of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
We file income tax returns in most of the federal, state, and provincial jurisdictions in the U.S., U.K., and Canada. Tax years through 2006 are closed, while exam years 2007 and 2008 have been effectively settled and only remain open pending finalization of an Advanced Pricing Agreement ("APA"). Tax years through fiscal year ended February 8, 2005 are closed or have been effectively settled through examination in Canada. Tax years through 2007 are closed or have been effectively settled through examination in the U.K. We have elected to treat our portion of all foreign subsidiary earnings through December 25, 2010 as permanently reinvested under the accounting guidance and accordingly, have not provided any U.S. federal or state tax thereon. As of December 25, 2010, approximately $965 million of retained earnings attributable to foreign subsidiaries was considered to be indefinitely invested. The Company's intention is to reinvest the earnings permanently or to repatriate the earnings when it is tax effective to do so. It is not practicable to determine the amount of incremental taxes that might arise were these earnings to be remitted. However, the Company believes that U.S. foreign tax credits would largely eliminate any U.S. taxes and offset any foreign withholding taxes due on remittance. |
|
8. Unusual or Infrequent Items We have incurred charges or gains that we do not believe to be indicative of our core operations. As such, we have separately classified these costs as special items. Summary of Special Items
The table below summarizes the activity in the restructuring accruals by segment:
|
|
9. Stockholders' Equity Changes to the number of shares of capital stock issued were as follows:
Preferred Stock At December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, 25.0 million shares of no par value preferred stock were authorized but not issued. Class A and Class B Common Stock Dividend Rights Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of preferred stock, holders of our Class A common stock ("Class A common stock") are entitled to receive, from legally available funds, dividends when and as declared by the Board of Directors of Molson Coors, except that so long as any shares of our Class B common stock ("Class B common stock") are outstanding, no dividend will be declared or paid on the Class A common stock unless at the same time a dividend in an amount per share (or number per share, in the case of a dividend paid in the form of shares) equal to the dividend declared or paid on the Class A common stock is declared or paid on the Class B common stock. Voting Rights Except in limited circumstances, including the right of the holders of the Class B common stock and our special Class B voting stock (through which holders of Class B exchangeable shares vote) voting together as a single class to elect three directors to the Molson Coors Board of Directors, the right to vote for all purposes is vested exclusively in the holders of the Class A common stock and our special Class A voting stock, voting together as a single class. The holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held, without the right to cumulate votes for the election of directors. An affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the Class A common stock and special Class A voting stock (through which holders of Class A exchangeable shares vote), voting together as a single class, is required prior to the taking of certain actions, including:
Pentland Securities (1981) Inc. (the "Pentland Trust") and Adolph Coors, Jr. Trust (the "Coors Trust"), which together control more than 90% of the Company's Class A common stock and Class A exchangeable shares, have voting trust agreements through which they have combined their voting power over the shares of our Class A common stock and the Class A exchangeable shares that they own. However, in the event that these two stockholders do not agree to vote in favor of a matter submitted to a stockholder vote (other than the election of directors), the voting trustees will be required to vote all of the Class A common stock and Class A exchangeable shares deposited in the voting trusts against the matter. There is no other mechanism in the voting trust agreements to resolve a potential deadlock between these stockholders. The Certificate of Incorporation provides the holders of Class B common stock and special Class B voting stock, voting together as a single class, the right to elect three directors to the Molson Coors Board of Directors. In addition, the holders of Class B common stock and special Class B voting stock, voting together as a single class, have the right to vote on specified transactional matters. The holders of Class B common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held with respect to each matter on which holders of the Class B common stock are entitled to vote, without the right to cumulate votes for the election of directors. Rights Upon Dissolution or Wind Up If Molson Coors liquidates, dissolves or winds up its affairs, the holders of Class A common stock, together with the holders of the Class B common stock, would be entitled to receive, after Molson Coors' creditors have been paid and the holders of any then outstanding series of preferred stock have received their liquidation preferences, all of the remaining assets of Molson Coors in proportion to their share holdings. Holders of Class A and Class B common stock do not have pre-emptive rights to acquire any securities of Molson Coors. The outstanding shares of Class A and Class B common stock are fully paid and non-assessable. Conversion Rights The Certificate of Incorporation provides for the right of holders of Class A common stock to convert their stock into Class B common stock on a one-for-one basis at any time. Exchangeable Shares The Class A exchangeable shares and Class B exchangeable shares were issued by Molson Coors Canada Inc. ("MCCI") a wholly-owned subsidiary. The exchangeable shares are substantially the economic equivalent of the corresponding shares of Class A and Class B common stock that a Molson shareholder would have received in the Merger if the holder had elected to receive shares of Molson Coors common stock. Holders of exchangeable shares also receive, through a voting trust, the benefit of Molson Coors voting rights, entitling the holder to one vote on the same basis and in the same circumstances as one corresponding share of Molson Coors common stock. The exchangeable shares are exchangeable at any time, at the option of the holder on a one-for-one basis for corresponding shares of Molson Coors common stock. Holders of exchangeable shares are entitled to receive, subject to applicable law, dividends as follows:
The declaration dates, record dates and payment dates for dividends on the exchangeable shares are the same as the relevant dates for the dividends on the shares of corresponding Molson Coors common stock. |
|
11. Properties The cost of properties and related accumulated depreciation and amortization consists of the following:
Depreciation expense was $159.6 million, $167.5 million and $251.0 million for fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. We estimate that the loss, breakage and deterioration of our returnable containers (including returnable bottles, kegs and pallets) is comparable to the depreciation calculated on an estimated useful life of approximately 15 years for returnable kegs, 4 years for returnable bottles and 2 years for pallets. Loss and breakage expense, included in the depreciation expense amounts noted above, was $31.2 million, $30.3 million and $21.5 million for fiscal years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and is classified within Cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The expense recognition policy for including loss and breakage expense within Cost of goods sold has been applied consistently before and after the Balance Sheet classification change discussed in Note 1, "Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" under the sub-heading, "Properties". We own and maintain the dispensing equipment in on-premise retail outlets. Dispensing equipment that transfers the beer from the keg in the cellar to the glass is capitalized at cost upon installation and depreciated on a straight-line basis over lives of up to 7 years, depending on the nature and usage of the equipment. Labor and materials used to install dispensing equipment are capitalized and depreciated over 2 years. Dispensing equipment awaiting installation is held in inventory and valued at the lower of cost or market. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. The following table details the ranges of the useful economic lives assigned to depreciable property, plant and equipment for the periods presented:
|
|
12. Goodwill and Intangible Assets The following summarizes the changes in goodwill:
Goodwill was allocated between our segments as follows:
The following table presents details of our intangible assets, other than goodwill, as of December 25, 2010:
The following table presents details of our intangible assets, other than goodwill, as of December 26, 2009:
The change in the gross carrying amounts of intangibles from December 26, 2009 to December 25, 2010, is primarily due to the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations, as a significant amount of intangibles are denominated in foreign currencies. The gross carrying value was also impacted by the 51% purchase of MC-Si'hai in 2010. Based on foreign exchange rates as of December 25, 2010, the estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets is as follows:
Amortization expense of intangible assets was $42.7 million, $40.5 million, and $43.3 million for the years ended December 25, 2010, December 26, 2009, and December 28, 2008, respectively. We are required to perform goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests on at least an annual basis and more frequently in certain circumstances. We completed the required annual impairment testing during the third quarter of 2010 and determined that there were no impairments of goodwill or other indefinite-live intangible assets. No impairment losses were included in the goodwill balances as of December 25, 2010 or December 26, 2009. |
|
13. Debt Our total long-term borrowings as of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, were composed of the following:
Our total short-term borrowings facilities consist of a $20.0 million line of credit with a borrowing rate of USD LIBOR +1.5%, an overdraft facility of CAD 30.0 million at either USD Prime or CAD Prime depending on the borrowing currency, a line of credit for GBP 10.0 million and an overdraft facility for GBP 10.0 million, both at GBP LIBOR +1.5%, and a line of credit for Japanese Yen 1.0 billion, of which 275.0 million is committed under an outstanding letter of credit, at a base rate of less than 1.0%. As of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, we have no borrowings under any of these facilities. See Note 20, "Commitments and Contingencies" for discussion related to letters of credit. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2010, MC-Si'hai opened a short-term borrowing facility for Chinese Renminbi ("RMB") 7.0 million. As of December 25, 2010, the outstanding balance of this borrowing was RMB 7.0 million ($1.1 million). As of December 25, 2010, the aggregate principal debt maturities of long-term debt and short-term borrowings for the next five fiscal years are as follows:
Under the terms of some of our debt facilities, we must comply with certain restrictions. These restrictions include restrictions on debt secured by certain types of mortgages, certain threshold percentages of secured consolidated net tangible assets, and restrictions on certain types of sale lease-back transactions. As of December 25, 2010, we were in compliance with all of these restrictions. Interest Interest incurred, capitalized and expensed were as follows:
|
|
15. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The significant fluctuations to other comprehensive income due to foreign currency translation adjustments resulted from the strengthening of the CAD and weakening of the GBP during 2010, compared to the strengthening of both in 2009 and the weakening of both in 2008. We have significant levels of net assets denominated in these currencies due to our operations in those countries, and therefore other comprehensive income increases and/or decreases when those items are translated to our reporting currency, which is USD. The increase in other comprehensive income due to pension and other post retirement benefit adjustments is due to a decrease in our pension obligations in 2010, driven by increased contributions and improvements in pension asset values, while we had increases in pension obligations in 2009, driven by changes in discount rate and inflation assumptions. The decrease in other comprehensive income associated with our equity method investments in 2010 is related to our 42% share of the unrealized gains on MillerCoors derivative instruments and unrealized losses on pension obligations, along with changes to BRI and BDL pension obligations. |
|
16. Employee Retirement Plans The Company maintains retirement plans in Canada, the U.K. and the U.S. Depending on the benefit program, we provide either defined benefit or defined contribution plans to our employees in Canada and the U.K. Each plan is managed locally and in accordance with respective local laws and regulations. All retirement plans for MCBC employees in the United States are defined contribution pension plans. MillerCoors maintains defined benefit pension plans as well; however, those plans are excluded from this disclosure because MillerCoors is not consolidated. Defined Benefit Plans Net Periodic Pension Cost The following represents our net periodic pension cost:
Projected Benefit Obligation: The changes in the projected benefit obligation, plan assets and the funded status of the pension plans are as follows:
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss, pre-tax were as follows:
Amortization Amounts Expected to be Recognized in Net Periodic Pension Cost During Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2011, pre-tax:
Pension expense is actuarially calculated annually based on data available at the beginning of each year. Assumptions used in the calculation include the settlement discount rate selected and disclosed at the end of the previous year as well as other assumptions detailed in the table below.
Investment Strategy The obligations of our defined benefit plans are supported by assets held in trust for the payment of future benefits. The Company is obligated to adequately fund these asset trusts. The underlying investments within our defined benefit plans include: cash and short term instruments, debt securities, equity securities, investment funds, real estate and other investments including hedge fund of funds. Relative allocations reflect the demographics of the respective plans. We use a liability driven investment strategy in managing all of our defined benefits. For all of our defined benefit plan assets we have the following primary investment objectives:
Each plan's respective allocation targets promote optimal expected return and volatility characteristics given a focus on a long-term time horizon for fulfilling the plans' obligations. All assets are managed by external investment managers with a mandate to either match or outperform their benchmark. We use different asset managers in the U.K. and Canada. Our investment strategies for our defined benefit plans also consider the funding status for each plan. For defined benefit plans that are highly funded, assets are invested primarily in fixed income holdings that have a similar duration to the associated liabilities. For plans with lower funding levels, the fixed income component is managed in a similar manner to the highly funded plans. In addition to this liability-matching fixed income allocation, these plans also contain exposure to return generating assets including: equities, real estate, debt, and other investments held with the goal of producing higher returns, which may also have a higher risk profile. These investments are diversified by investing globally with limitations placed on issuer concentration. For both our U.K. and Canadian plans, we hedge a portion of our foreign exchange exposure from plan assets which are not denominated in the local plan currency back to the local currency given our Canadian pension liabilities will be paid in CAD and our U.K. pension liabilities will be paid in GBP. Target Allocations The following compares target asset allocation percentages with actual asset allocations at December 25, 2010:
Long Term Expected Return on Assets Assumption: We develop our long term expected return on assets (EROA) assumptions annually with input from independent investment specialists including our actuaries, investment consultants and other specialists. Each EROA assumption is based on historical data, including historical returns, historical market rates and is calculated for each plan's individual asset class. The calculation includes inputs for interest, inflation, credit, and risk premium (active investment management) rates and fees paid to service providers. We consider our EROA to be a significant management estimate. Any material changes in the inputs to our methodology used in calculating our EROA could have a significant impact on our reported defined benefit plans' expense. Significant concentration risks: We periodically evaluate our defined benefit plan assets for concentration risks. As of period end, we did not have any individual asset positions that comprised greater than 10% of each plan's overall assets. However, we currently have significant plan assets invested in U.K., U.S. and Canadian government fixed income holdings. A provisional credit rating downgrade for any of these governments, could impact the asset values in a negative manner. Further, as both our U.K. and Canadian plans maintain exposure to non-government investments, a significant system-wide increase in credit spreads would also negatively impact the reported plan asset values. In general, equity and fixed income risks have been mitigated by company-specific concentration limits and by utilizing multiple equity managers. We do have significant amounts of assets invested with individual fixed income and hedge fund managers and so we use outside investment consultants to aid in the oversight of these managers. Valuation Techniques We use a variety of industry accepted valuation techniques to value our plan assets. The techniques vary depending upon instrument type. Whenever possible, we prioritize the use of observable market data in our valuation processes. We use market, income and cost approaches to value our plan assets as of period end. See Note 1 "Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for additional information on our fair value methodologies and accounting policies. We have not changed our fair value techniques used to value plan assets this year. Major Categories of Plan Assets As of December 25, 2010, our major categories of plan assets included the following:
Fair Value Hierarchy The following presents our fair value hierarchy for our defined benefit pension plan assets by location.
Fair Value: Level Three Rollforward The following presents our Level 3 Rollforward for our defined pension plan assets by location.
Expected Cash Flows In 2011, we expect to make contributions to our plans totaling approximately $11 million$81 million, depending on the final resolution of potential discretionary contributions. MillerCoors' contributions to its defined benefit pension plans are not included here, as MillerCoors is not consolidated in our financial statements. Plan funding strategies are influenced by employee benefits and tax laws. Information about expected cash flows for the consolidated retirement plans (including consolidated joint ventures) follows:
U.K. Plan Curtailment The U.K. defined benefit plan was closed to new employees in April 2006, and was closed to all additional service credit effective in April 2009. During October 2008, we announced a plan for the cessation of employee service credit with regard to retirement benefits in the U.K. pension plan. It was subsequently announced in December 2008 that employee service credit would cease with regard to the earning of pension benefits, effective April 4, 2009. This cessation of benefits was a curtailment event. As a result, we recognized a pension gain of $10.4 million, representing the immediate recognition of previously unamortized prior service benefit. The $6.2 million reduction of the projected benefit obligation as a result of the curtailment was netted against actuarial losses reflected in the plan's remeasurement, and therefore was not recognized as a gain on the income statement. Defined Contribution Plans Canadian employees typically participate in the defined contribution portion of the registered pension plans. The employer contributions range from 3% to 8.5% of employee compensation. Our contributions in 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $6.4 million, $5.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively. The investment strategy for defined contribution plans in the U.S, Canada and the U.K. are determined by each individual participant. During 2010, U.S. employees were eligible to participate in the Molson Coors Savings and Investment Plan, a qualified voluntary defined contribution plan. We match 50% of our hourly and salaried non-exempt and 75% of our salaried exempt employees' contributions up to 6% of employee compensation. Both employee and employer contributions were made in cash in accordance with participant investment elections. There were no minimum amounts that are required to be invested in Molson Coors stock. Our contributions in 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $2.7 million, $2.2 million and $5.3 million, respectively. The reason for the decrease from 2008 to 2009 is due to the MillerCoors joint venture. From April 2006, new employees of the U.K. business were not entitled to join the Company's defined benefit pension plan. Instead these employees were and still are given an opportunity to participate in a defined contribution plan. Company contributions to this plan were $3.7 million, $2.2 million and $1.5 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Effective in April 2009 the U.K. pension plan was closed to future service credit. The majority of the employees in the defined benefit plan opted to join a new scheme within the existing defined contribution plan. The Company's contributions to this new scheme within the existing defined contribution plan were $11.0 million and $8.9 million in 2010 and 2009, respectively. The defined contribution plan has a number of different schemes within it to accommodate the different employee and employer contribution structures that are available to members. During 2009 we established for certain U.S. employees a nonqualified defined contribution plan. MCBC has voluntarily funded these liabilities through a Rabbi Trust. These are company assets which are invested in publicly traded mutual funds whose performance is expected to closely match changes in the plan liabilities. Fair Value Hierarchy The following presents our fair value hierarchy for our corporate invested plan assets.
|
|
17. Postretirement Benefits Our Canadian and U.S. employees have postretirement plans that provide medical benefits and life insurance for retirees and eligible dependents. The plans are not funded. The obligations under these plans were determined by the application of the terms of medical and life insurance plans, together with relevant actuarial assumptions and health care cost trend rates detailed in the table below.
Our net periodic postretirement benefit cost and changes in the projected benefit obligation of the postretirement benefit plans are as follows:
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive loss (income), pre-tax were as follows:
Amortization Amounts Expected to be Recognized in Net Periodic Postretirement Cost During Fiscal Year Ending December 31, 2011 (pre-tax):
Expected Cash Flows Information about expected cash flows for the consolidated post-retirement plans follows:
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
|
|
18. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Overview and Risk Management Policies We use derivatives as part of our normal business operations to manage our exposure to fluctuations in interest, foreign currency, commodity, production and packaging material costs and for other strategic purposes related to our core business. We have established policies and procedures that govern the risk management of these exposures. Our primary objective in managing these exposures is to decrease the volatility of our earnings and cash flows affected by changes in the underlying rates and prices. We also occasionally transact derivatives for other strategic purposes, which includes our total return swaps and related option contracts. To achieve this objective, we enter into a variety of financial derivatives, including foreign currency exchange, commodity, forward starting interest rate, and cross currency swaps, the values of which change in the opposite direction of the anticipated future cash flows. We also enter into physical hedging agreements directly with our suppliers as an added instrument to manage our exposure to certain commodities. Counterparty Risk While, by policy, the counterparties to any of the financial derivatives we enter into are major institutions with investment grade credit ratings of at least A- (Standard & Poor's), A3 (Moody's) or better, we are exposed to credit related losses in the event of non-performance by counterparties. This credit risk is generally limited to the unrealized gains in such contracts, should any of these counterparties fail to perform as contracted. We have established counterparty credit policy and guidelines that are monitored and reported to management according to prescribed guidelines to assist in managing this risk. As an additional measure, we utilize a portfolio of institutions either headquartered or operating in the same countries that we conduct our business. In calculating the fair value of our derivative balances, we also record an adjustment to recognize the risk of counterparty credit and MCBC non-performance risk. Liquidity Risk We base the fair value of our derivative instruments upon market rates and prices. The volatility of these rates and prices are dependent on many factors that cannot be forecasted with reliable accuracy. The current fair values of our contracts could differ significantly from the cash settled values with our counterparties. As such, we are exposed to liquidity risk related to unfavorable changes in the fair value of our derivative contracts. We may be forced to cash settle all or a portion of our derivative contracts before the expected settlement date upon the occurrence of certain contractual triggers including a change of control termination event or other breach of agreement. This could have a negative impact on our cash position. For derivative contracts that we have designated as hedging instruments, early cash settlement would result in the timing of our hedge settlement not being matched to the cash settlement of the forecasted transaction or firm commitment. We may also decide to cash settle all or a portion of our derivative contracts before the expected settlement date through negotiations with our counterparties, which could also impact our liquidity. Due to the nature of our counterparty agreements, we are not able to net positions with the same counterparty across business units. Thus, in the event of default, we may be required to early settle all out-of-the-money contracts, without the benefit of netting the fair value of any in-the-money positions against this exposure. Collateral For the majority of our derivative transactions, we do not receive and are not required to post collateral unless a change of control event occurs. This termination event would give either party the right to early terminate all outstanding swap transactions in the event that the other party consolidates, merges with, or transfers all or substantially all its assets to, another entity, and the creditworthiness of the surviving entity that has assumed such party's obligations is "materially weaker" than that of such party. As of December 25, 2010, we did not have any collateral posted with our counterparty. Derivative Accounting Policies Overview The majority of our derivative contracts qualify and are designated as cash flow hedges. We have also elected the Normal Purchase Normal Sales ("NPNS") exemption for certain contracts. These contracts are typically transacted with our suppliers and include risk management features that allow us to fix the price on specific volumes of purchases for specified delivery periods. The Company also considers whether any provisions in our contracts represent "embedded" derivative instruments as defined in authoritative accounting guidance. As of December 25, 2010, we have concluded that no "embedded" derivative instruments warrant separate fair value accounting. Hedge Accounting Policies We formally document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk-management objective and strategy for undertaking hedge transactions. We also formally assess both at the hedge's inception and on an ongoing basis, specifically whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. We discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when (1) the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of a forecasted future transaction; (2) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (3) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur; (4) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate; or (5) management decides to cease hedge accounting. When we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively, but it continues to be probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period, the existing gain or loss on the derivative remains in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") and is reclassified into earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, if it is no longer probable that a forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within an additional two-month period of time thereafter, the gains and losses in AOCI are recognized immediately in earnings. In all situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, we carry the derivative at its fair value on the balance sheet until maturity, recognizing future changes in the fair value in current period earnings. Presentation Derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. See our discussion regarding fair value measurements below. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, we do not record the fair value of derivatives for which we have elected the NPNS exemption. We account for these contracts on an accrual basis, recording realized settlements related to these contracts to the same financial statement line items as the corresponding transaction. For derivative contracts recorded on the balance sheet, MCBC allocates the current and non-current portion of each contract's fair value to the appropriate asset/liability line item. Unrealized gain positions are recorded as other current assets or other non-current assets. Unrealized loss positions are recorded as other current liabilities or other non-current liabilities. Our policy is to present all derivative balances on a gross basis, without regard to counterparty master netting agreements or similar arrangements. We record realized gains and losses from derivative instruments to the same financial statement line item as the hedged item/forecasted transaction. Changes in unrealized gains and losses for derivatives not designated as either a cash flow hedge or fair value hedge are recorded directly in earnings each period and are recorded to the same financial statement line item as the associated realized (cash settled) gains and losses. Changes in fair values (to the extent of hedge effectiveness) of outstanding cash flow hedges are recorded in OCI, until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows of the underlying hedged transaction. The recognition of effective hedge results in the consolidated statement of income offsets the gains or losses on the underlying exposure. Any ineffectiveness is recorded directly into earnings each period. Significant Derivative/Hedge Positions Cross Currency Swaps Simultaneous with the September 22, 2005, U.S. private debt placement, we entered into a cross currency swap transaction for the entire $300 million issue amount and for the same maturity of September 2010. In this transaction we exchanged our $300 million for a CAD 355.5 million obligation with a third party. The swaps also called for an exchange of fixed CAD interest payments for fixed USD interest receipts. We designated this transaction as a hedge of the variability of the cash flows associated with the payment of interest and principal on the USD securities. Changes in the value of the transaction due to foreign exchange were recorded in earnings and were offset by a revaluation of the associated debt instrument. Changes in the value of the transaction due to interest rates were recorded to OCI. During the third quarter of 2010, our $300 million/CAD 355.5 million cross currency swap matured and was cash settled in accordance with the terms of the contract. On April 10, 2007, we entered into several cross currency swaps that mature in May 2012 to hedge the foreign currency impact of intercompany GBP debt in a CAD functional currency subsidiary. The cross currency swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted CAD cash flows related to GBP interest and principal payments on the intercompany loans. The notional amount of the swaps is GBP 530 million (CAD 1.2 billion at inception). The cross currency swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges of the changes in value of the future CAD interest and principal payments that results from changes in the GBP to CAD exchange rates on an intercompany loan between our U.K. and Corporate segments. We are also a party to other cross currency swaps totaling GBP 530 million ($774 million at inception). The swaps call for an exchange of fixed GBP interest payments for fixed USD interest receipts. The cross currency swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges of the changes in value of the future GBP interest and principal receipts. Forward Starting Interest Rate Swaps In order to manage our exposure to the volatility of the interest rates associated with the future interest payments on a forecasted debt issuance, we transacted forward starting interest rate swap contracts. These swaps had a total notional value of CAD 200 million with an average fixed rate of 3.3%. The swaps had an effective date which started in September 2010 and a termination date in 2017, mirroring the term of the forecasted debt issuance. Under these agreements we were required to early terminate these swaps in September of 2010, at the approximate time we issued the previously forecasted debt (see Note 14, "DEBT" for further discussion of our October 6, 2010 issuance of CAD 500 million 3.95% fixed rate senior notes). We had designated these contracts as cash flow hedges on a portion of the interest payments on a future forecasted debt issuance. During the third quarter of 2010, our forward starting interest rate swaps matured and were cash settled in accordance with the terms of each contract. At the time of the CAD 500 million private placement offering and pricing, the government of Canada bond rates were trading at a yield lower than that locked in with the Company's interest rate lock. This resulted in a loss of CAD 7.9 million on the forward starting interest rate swaps. Per authoritative accounting guidance pertaining to derivatives and hedging, the loss is being amortized over the life of the Canadian issued private placement and will serve to increase the Company's effective cost of borrowing by approximately .0023% compared to the stated coupon on the issue. Foreign Currency Forwards As of period end, we have financial foreign exchange forward contracts in place to manage our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations. We hedge foreign currency exposure related to certain royalty agreements, exposure associated with the purchase of production inputs and imports that are denominated in currencies other than the functional entity's local currency, and other foreign exchanges exposures. We use foreign currency forward contracts to hedge these future forecasted transactions with up to a thirty-six month horizon. Commodity Swaps As of yearend, we had financial commodity swap contracts in place to hedge certain future expected purchases of natural gas. Essentially, these contracts allow us to swap our floating exposure to natural gas prices for a fixed rate. These contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges of forecasted natural gas purchases. The fair value of these swaps depends upon current market rates in relation to our fixed rate under the swap agreements at period end. MCBC uses these swaps to hedge forecasted purchases up to twenty-four months in advance. Total Return Swaps In 2008, we entered into a series of cash settled total return swap contracts. We transacted these swaps for the purpose of gaining exposure to Foster's, a major global brewer. These swaps are marked-to-market each period as these swaps do not qualify for hedge accounting. As such, all unrealized gains and losses related to these swaps are recorded directly to the income statement and are classified as other income (expense) in MCI and Corporate. During the third quarter of 2010, we accelerated the maturity dates of our total return swaps related to Foster's stock, and the majority of these swaps were settled prior to year end. Simultaneously, we entered into a series of option contracts to limit our exposure to future changes in Foster's stock price, effectively fixing a range of settlement values for our remaining open swap positions. The remaining total return swaps and related options matured in January of 2011. Derivative Fair Value Measurements We utilize market approaches to estimate the fair value of our derivative instruments by discounting anticipated future cash flows derived from the derivative's contractual terms and observable market interest, foreign exchange and commodity rates. The fair values of our derivatives also include credit risk adjustments to account for our counterparties' credit risk, as well as MCBC's own non-performance risk. As of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009 these adjustments resulted in net gains in AOCI of $2.7 million and $3.3 million, respectively, as the fair values of our derivatives were in net liability positions at both period ends. The table below summarizes our derivative assets and liabilities that were measured at fair value as of December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009. See Note 1 "Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for further discussion related to measuring fair value derivative instruments.
The table below summarizes derivative valuation activity using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) (In millions):
During 2010 we entered into new option contracts that were classified as Level 3 as the valuations were based upon significant unobservable inputs. We did not have any significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during the year. During 2009 we transferred $10.5 million of derivative liability related to one cross currency swap out of Level 3 and into Level 2 as the position's valuation became based upon observable market inputs with unobservable inputs no longer playing a significant role in the valuation. Results of Period Derivative Activity The tables below include the year to date results of our derivative activity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 25, 2010 and the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 25, 2010. Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions)
MCBC allocates the current and non-current portion of each contract to the corresponding derivative account above. The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations (in millions)
Note: Amounts recognized in AOCI are gross of taxes
During the period we recorded no significant ineffectiveness related to these cash flow hedges. Other Derivatives (in millions)
The tables below include the year to date results of our derivative activity in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 26, 2009 and the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 26, 2009. Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Balance Sheet (in millions)
MCBC allocates the current and non-current portion of each contract to the corresponding derivative account above. The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Consolidated Statement of Operations (in millions)
Note: Amounts recognized in AOCI are gross of taxes
During the period we recorded no significant ineffectiveness related to these cash flow hedges. Other Derivatives (in millions)
|
|
19. Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Accrued brewing operations costs consist of amounts owed for beer raw materials, packaging materials, freight charges, utilities, and other manufacturing and distribution costs. The increases in values from 2009 to 2010 are primarily attributable to increases in accrued brewing operations costs and reclassification of our guarantee related to BRI indebtedness from long-term to short-term discussed in further detail in Note 20 "Commitments and Contingencies". |
|
20. Commitments and Contingencies Letters of Credit As of December 25, 2010, we had approximately $17.7 million outstanding in letters of credit with financial institutions. These letters expire at different points in 2011. Approximately $3.3 million of the letters contain a feature that automatically renews the letter for an additional year if no cancellation notice is submitted. These letters of credit are being maintained as security for deferred compensation payments, reimbursements to insurance companies, reimbursements to the trustee for pension payments, deductibles or retention payments made on our behalf, various payments due to governmental agencies, and for operations of underground storage tanks. Guarantees MCBC guarantees indebtedness and other obligations to banks and other third parties for some of its equity investments and consolidated subsidiaries, primarily BRI. Refer to Note 4, "Investments," for further information. Other liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets include $100.4 million, of which $94.2 million is current and $6.2 million is non-current, and $96.4 million, all of which is non-current, as of December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, respectively, related to such guarantees. Supply Contracts We have various long-term supply contracts with unaffiliated third parties and our joint venture partners to purchase materials used in production and packaging, such as starch, cans and glass. The supply contracts provide that we purchase certain minimum levels of materials throughout the terms of the contracts. The future aggregate minimum required purchase commitments under these supply contracts are shown in the table below. The amounts in the table do not represent all anticipated payments under long-term contracts. Rather, they represent unconditional and legally enforceable committed expenditures:
Our total purchases under these contracts in 2010, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $492.8 million, $599.8 million and $1,073.9 million, respectively. Graphic Packaging Corporation We had a packaging supply agreement with a subsidiary of Graphic Packaging Corporation, a related party, under which we purchased our U.S. segment paperboard requirements. This contract is now held by MillerCoors. Our payments under the packaging agreement in the first half of 2008 totaled $42.7 million. Advertising and Promotions We have various long-term non-cancelable commitments for advertising, sponsorships and promotions, including marketing at sports arenas, stadiums and other venues and events. From time to time, MCBC guarantees the financial performance under certain contracts on behalf of its subsidiaries. At December 25, 2010, these future commitments are as follows:
Total advertising expense was $361.6 million, $349.3 million and $610.0 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Leases We lease certain office facilities and operating equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable agreements accounted for as operating leases. Future minimum lease payments under operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable terms in excess of one year are as follows:
Total rent expense was $33.5 million, $31.0 million and $62.2 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Environmental When we determine that it is probable that a liability for environmental matters or other legal actions exists and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable, an estimate of the future costs are recorded as a liability in the financial statements. Costs that extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the safety or efficiency of Company-owned assets or are incurred to mitigate or prevent future environmental contamination may be capitalized. Other environmental costs are expensed when incurred. Environmental expenditures at each of our segments for 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $0.2 million, $1.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively. Canada Our Canada brewing operations are subject to provincial environmental regulations and local permit requirements. Our Montréal and Toronto breweries have water treatment facilities to pre-treat waste water before it goes to the respective local governmental facility for final treatment. We have environmental programs in Canada including organization, monitoring and verification, regulatory compliance, reporting, education and training, and corrective action. We sold a chemical specialties business in 1996. The Company is still responsible for certain aspects of environmental remediation, undertaken or planned, at those chemical specialties business locations. We have established provisions for the costs of these remediation programs. United States We are one of a number of entities named by the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") at the Lowry Superfund site. This landfill is owned by the City and County of Denver ("Denver") and is managed by Waste Management of Colorado, Inc. ("Waste Management"). In 1990, we recorded a pretax charge of $30 million, a portion of which was put into a trust in 1993 as part of a settlement with Denver and Waste Management regarding then-outstanding litigation. Our settlement was based on an assumed remediation cost of $120 million (in 1992 adjusted dollars). We are obligated to pay a portion of future costs, if any, in excess of that amount. Waste Management provides us with updated annual cost estimates currently extending through 2032. We reviewed these cost estimates in the assessment of our accrual related to this issue. We use certain assumptions that differ from Waste Management's estimates to assess our expected liability. Our expected liability (based on the $120 million threshold being met) is based on our best estimates available. The assumptions used are as follows:
Based on these assumptions, the present value and gross amount of the costs at December 25, 2010, are approximately $3.2 million and $5.3 million, respectively. Accordingly, we believe that the existing liability is adequate as of December 25, 2010. We did not assume any future recoveries from insurance companies in the estimate of our liability, and none are expected. Considering the estimates extend through the year 2032 and the related uncertainties at the site, including what additional remedial actions may be required by the EPA, new technologies and what costs are included in the determination of when the $120 million threshold is reached, the estimate of our liability may change as further facts develop. We cannot predict the amount of any such change, but additional accruals in the future are possible. In April 2009, we received a written notice relating to the Lowry site, that the State of Colorado intended to seek compensation from MCBC and other parties to recover for natural resources damages. The State of Colorado informally asserted total damages of up to $10 million. However, the Company was potentially liable for only a portion of those damages. The State and the top responsible parties reached a settlement regarding this matter, and the settlement was approved by the court. We closed and paid this settlement of $0.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2010. In October 2006 we were notified by the EPA that we are a PRP, along with approximately 60 other parties, at the Cooper Drum site in southern California. Certain of Molson's former non-beer business operations, which were discontinued and sold in the mid-1990s prior to the Merger, were involved at this site. We responded to the EPA with information regarding our past involvement with the site. We have accrued $0.2 million, which represents our estimable loss at this time. Potential losses associated with the Cooper Drum site could increase as remediation planning progresses. During the third quarter of 2008 we were notified by the EPA that we are a PRP, along with others, at the East Rutherford and Berry's Creek sites in New Jersey. Certain of Molson's former non-beer business operations, which were discontinued and sold in the mid-1990s, were involved at this site. We have accrued $4.1 million, which represents our estimable loss at this time. Potential losses associated with the Berry's Creek site could increase as remediation planning progresses. While we cannot predict the eventual aggregate cost for environmental and related matters in which we are currently involved, we believe that any payments, if required, for these matters would be made over a period of time in amounts that would not be material in any one year to our operating results, cash flows or our financial or competitive position. We believe adequate reserves have been provided for losses that are probable and estimable. We are aware of groundwater contamination at some of our properties in Colorado resulting from historical, ongoing, or nearby activities. There may also be other contamination of which we are currently unaware. From time to time, we have been notified that we are or may be a PRP under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act or similar state laws for the cleanup of sites where hazardous substances have allegedly been released into the environment. We cannot predict with certainty the total costs of cleanup, our share of the total cost, the extent to which contributions will be available from other parties, the amount of time necessary to complete the cleanups or insurance coverage. United Kingdom We are subject to the requirements of government and local environmental and occupational health and safety laws and regulations. Compliance with these laws and regulations did not materially affect our 2010 capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position, and we do not anticipate that they will do so in 2011. Indemnity ObligationsSale of Kaiser As discussed in Note 5 "Discontinued Operations," we sold our entire equity interest in Kaiser during 2006 to FEMSA. The terms of the sale agreement require us to indemnify FEMSA for certain exposures related to tax, civil and labor contingencies arising prior to FEMSA's purchase of Kaiser. Additionally, we provided an indemnity to FEMSA for losses Kaiser may incur with respect to tax claims associated with certain previously utilized purchased tax credits. We generally classify such purchased tax credits into two categories. During 2009, FEMSA entered into a Brazilian tax amnesty program which substantially reduced penalties, interest, and attorney's fees owed by Kaiser to the government for the first category of purchased tax credits. In 2009, we provided consent to FEMSA to enter into the amnesty program but had not agreed to an indemnity amount owed to FEMSA related to the indemnity for these tax credits. During 2010, we reached a settlement agreement with FEMSA for the entirety of our indemnity obligations corresponding to the principal, penalties, interest and attorney's fees owed by Kaiser for this first category of purchased credits. This favorable settlement involved a cash payment of $96.0 million, and eliminated $284.5 million of maximum potential tax claims of which $131.2 million of indemnity liabilities were accrued on our balance sheet at December 26, 2009. The maximum potential claims amount remaining for the second category of purchased tax credits (which we believe present less risk than the first category), was $261.8 million as of December 25, 2010. As of December 25, 2010, our total estimate of the indemnity liability was $23.7 million, $9.5 million of which was classified as a current liability and $14.2 million of which was classified as non-current. Our indemnity obligations decreased by $130.9 million during 2010, primarily as a result of the aforementioned settlement, slightly offset by the impact of foreign exchange. Our estimates consider a number of scenarios for the ultimate resolution of these issues, the probabilities of which are influenced not only by legal developments in Brazil but also by management's intentions with regard to various alternatives that could present themselves leading to the ultimate resolution of these issues. The liabilities are impacted by changes in estimates regarding amounts that could be paid, the timing of such payments, adjustments to the probabilities assigned to various scenarios and foreign exchange. Additionally, we provided indemnity related to all other tax, civil, and labor contingencies existing as of the date of sale. In this regard, however, FEMSA assumed their full share of all of these contingent liabilities that had been previously recorded and disclosed by us prior to the sale on January 13, 2006. However, we may have to provide indemnity to FEMSA if those contingencies settle at amounts greater than those amounts previously recorded or disclosed by us. We will be able to offset any indemnity exposures in these circumstances with amounts that settle favorably to amounts previously recorded. Our exposure related to these indemnity claims is capped at the amount of the sales price of the 68% equity interest of Kaiser, which was $68.0 million. As a result of these contract provisions, our estimates include not only probability-weighted potential cash outflows associated with indemnity provisions, but also probability-weighted cash inflows that could result from favorable settlements, which could occur through negotiation or settlement programs that could arise from the federal or any of the various state governments in Brazil. The recorded value of the tax, civil, and labor indemnity liability was $10.0 million as of December 25, 2010, which is classified as non-current. Future settlement procedures and related negotiation activities associated with these contingencies are largely outside of our control. The sale agreement requires annual cash settlements relating to the tax, civil, and labor indemnities. Indemnity obligations related to purchased tax credits generally are settled upon notification of FEMSA's settlement. Due to the uncertainty involved with the ultimate outcome and timing of these contingencies, significant adjustments to the carrying values of the indemnity obligations have been recorded to date, and additional future adjustments may be required. These liabilities are denominated in Brazilian Reals and have been stated at present value and will, therefore, be subject in the future to foreign exchange gains or losses and to accretion cost, both of which will be recognized in the discontinued operations section of the statement of operations. The table below provides a summary of contingency reserve balances from December 30, 2007, through December 25, 2010:
Litigation and Other Disputes In 1999, Molson entered into an agreement for the distribution of Molson products in Brazil. In 2000, before commencing that business, Molson terminated the distribution agreement and paid the distributor $150,000 in settlement. The distributor then sued Molson to set aside the settlement and to seek additional compensation. The Appellate Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro ("Appellate Court") set aside the settlement agreement and determined that Molson was liable to the distributor, with the amount of damages to be determined through subsequent proceedings. An appeal of the liability decision is currently pending before the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, which allowed Molson's appeal during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and agreed to hear the merits of Molson's appeal. With respect to damages, the case was remanded to a Rio de Janeiro trial court to determine the amount of damages. The trial court retained an expert who provided a report adopting the position of the distributor and recommended damages based on a business plan that was never implemented. Molson challenged the irregularity of the expert process, the impartiality of the expert, as well as the report's specific recommendation. The trial court denied Molson's challenges. Molson filed an appeal before the Appellate Court regarding these procedural irregularities, which was denied during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. Following the trial court's procedural ruling during the third quarter of 2009, that court handed down a decision in the distributor's favor granting the full amount of the lost anticipated profits alleged by the distributor, approximately $42 million, plus attorney's fees and interest. Molson appealed the judgment to the Appellate Court. During the fourth quarter of 2009, the Appellate Court directed the court-retained expert to explain the basis for his damages calculation. During the first quarter of 2010, the Appellate Court granted Molson's appeal and vacated the $42 million judgment. The Appellate Court remanded the proceeding to the trial court and ordered that court to select a different expert. The Appellate Court furthermore directed the trial court to use specific criteria in setting damages, the effect of which should be to substantially reduce the award. Molson sought clarification as to the precise criteria to be used. In late April 2010, the Appellate Court denied Molson's motion for clarification, but limited the accrual of interest in this matter. In mid October 2010, the Appellate Court denied the distributor's motion to set aside the vacation of the $42 million judgment. We will continue to defend this case vigorously, and believe that a material adverse result is not probable. We are involved in other disputes and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the outcome of these proceedings, in our opinion, based on a review with legal counsel, none of these disputes and legal actions is expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters, for example, including the above-described advertising practices case, may arise from time to time that may harm our business. Insurance We are self-insured for certain insurable risks consisting primarily of U.S. employee health insurance programs. As with other large corporations, we maintain deductibles or self-insured retentions (SIR) for various types of insurance, e.g.: automobile liability, general and product liability and property. At times, we may decide to be self-insured for a particular insurable risk if we deem the cost to be greater than the potential benefit. In the past, we have been self-insured for certain insurable risks, such as employer's liability in the U.K., and the resulting claims reserves are reviewed and adjusted as necessary at least on a quarterly basis. Our accrued reserves related to self-insurance and deductibles/SIR were $2.6 million and $2.1 million at December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively. |
|
21. Supplemental Guarantor Information For purposes of this Note 21, including the table, the following terms shall mean: "Parent Guarantor and 2007 Issuer" shall mean MCBC; "2002 Issuer" shall mean CBC; "2005 Issuers and 2010 Issuer" shall mean collectively Molson Coors International, LP and Molson Coors Capital Finance ULC. On June 15, 2007, MCBC issued $575.0 million of 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes due July 30, 2013 in a registered offering (see Note 13, "Debt"). The convertible notes are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by CBC, Molson Coors International, LP ("MCI LP"), Molson Coors Capital Finance ULC ("MC Capital Finance") and certain U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries of MCBC ("Subsidiary Guarantors"). On May 7, 2002, CBC completed a public offering of $850.0 million principal amount of 6.375% Senior notes due 2012. During the third quarter of 2007, $625.0 million of these notes were extinguished by the proceeds received from the 2.5% Convertible Senior Notes and cash on hand. During the first quarter of 2008, an additional $180.4 million of these notes were extinguished using existing cash resources. The remaining outstanding senior notes are guaranteed on a senior and unsecured basis by MCBC, MCI LP, MC Capital Finance, and the Subsidiary Guarantors. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. On September 22, 2005, MCI LP and MC Capital Finance completed a public offering of $1.1 billion principal amount of Senior notes composed of $300 million 4.85% notes due 2010 and CAD 900.0 million 5.00% notes due 2015. During the third quarter of 2010, the $300 million 4.85% notes were repaid in full. Subsequently on October 6, 2010, MCI LP, completed a private placement in Canada of CAD 500 million 3.95% fixed rate Series A Notes due 2017. Although MC Capital Finance was not a co-issuer on the 2010 notes, it continues to be presented with MCI LP as MC Capital Finance is an inactive entity with no activity or any remaining significant assets or liabilities which would require separate presentation. Both the remaining CAD 900.0 million 2005 notes and the 2010 Series A Notes are guaranteed on a senior and unsecured basis by MCBC, CBC, and Subsidiary Guarantors, and for the 2010 Series A Notes, MC Capital Finance. The guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. Funds necessary to meet the debt service obligations of MCI LP and MC Capital Finance are provided in large part by distributions or advances from MCBC's other subsidiaries. Under certain circumstances, contractual and legal restrictions, as well as our financial condition and operating requirements, could limit the ability of MCI LP and MC Capital Finance to obtain cash for the purpose of meeting its debt service obligation, including the payment of principal and interest on the notes. On June 30, 2008, Molson Canada 2005, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of MCBC, guaranteed the obligations of MCBC under the credit facility dated as of March 2, 2005. As a result of such guarantee, Molson Canada 2005 became a guarantor under the following (i) the indenture related to the Senior notes dated as of May 7, 2002 and as supplemented; (ii) the indenture related to the Senior notes dated September 22, 2005 and as supplemented; and (iii) the indenture related to the Senior convertible notes dated June 15, 2007 and as supplemented (collectively the "Notes"). This change was effective for our 2008 third quarter. On December 25, 2010, CBC transferred its equity method investment in MillerCoors to MC Holding Company LLC, a newly created wholly-owned subsidiary of MCBC and a guarantor of the Notes as well as the 2010 senior notes. As a result of the transfer, the investment in MillerCoors is presented in the column "Subsidiary Guarantors" at December 25, 2010 and all results of operations and cash flows related to the investment in MillerCoors subsequent to December 25, 2010 will be presented in that column. The transfer of the investment between the 2002 Issuer and Subsidiary Guarantor categories does not negatively affect the holders of the Notes or the holders of the 2010 senior notes as both the prior holder of the MillerCoors investment, CBC, and the current holder, MC Holding Company LLC, are joint and severally liable under the Notes and the 2010 senior notes by virtue of their status as issuer or guarantor. We revised our presentation of the supplemental guarantor information to separately present the impact of intercompany activity for the Parent Guarantor and 2007 Issuer, the 2002 Issuer, the 2005 Issuers and 2010 Issuer, Subsidiary Guarantor and Subsidiary Non-Guarantor categories. As such, our consolidating financial statements for all periods reflect the revised presentation, with the most significant change being the gross presentation of our intercompany notes receivable and payable amongst affiliates and the related impacts on the statements of operations and cash flows. Intercompany notes receivable, which were previously included as a component of equity, continue to be presented as a component of equity (contra-equity) based on the nature of the notes, anticipated repayments and the consideration of the inherent control associated with the relationships of the entities, while the intercompany notes payable are now presented as a liability. Additionally, we have revised our presentation of the 2008 and 2009 guarantor statements of cash flows to reflect the elimination of certain cash flows that were previously presented within the elimination column resulting from the classification changes made to our intercompany note presentation. Our prior period consolidating financial information has also been revised to present the comparative information consistent with the new presentation. We believe that the revised presentation provides greater clarity surrounding the activity between the guarantors and non-guarantors of our third party debt. The revised presentation of the supplemental guarantor information does not amend or change the respective priority or status of the above-referenced senior notes and convertible notes. The following information sets forth the Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations for the years ended December 25, 2010, December 26, 2009 and December 28, 2008, Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, and Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 25, 2010, December 26, 2009 and December 28, 2008. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for on the equity method; accordingly, entries necessary to consolidate the Parent Guarantor, each of the issuers and all of our guarantor and non-guarantor subsidiaries are reflected in the eliminations column. In the opinion of management, separate complete financial statements of MCBC, CBC, MCI LP, MC Capital Finance, and the Subsidiary Guarantors would not provide additional material information that would be useful in assessing their financial composition.
MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
22. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited) The following summarizes selected quarterly financial information for each of the two years ended December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009.
As discussed in Note 1, "Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," during the fourth quarter of 2010, we changed the classification of our returnable bottles and pallets to noncurrent assets within Properties in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and adjusted our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows accordingly, reflecting the purchases of returnable bottles and pallets as investing activities. The amounts presented in our historical quarterly financial statements have also been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation as follows:
|
|
SCHEDULE II
|
|
Principles of Consolidation Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts and our majority-owned and controlled domestic and foreign subsidiaries, as well as certain variable interest entities. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. |
Revenue Recognition Depending upon the method of distribution and shipping terms, revenue is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership are transferred to the customer or distributor, which is either at the time of shipment to distributors or upon delivery of product to retail customers. In the United Kingdom, excise taxes are included in the purchase price we pay the vendor on beverages for the factored brands business purchased from third parties for resale, and are included in our net sales and cost of goods sold when ultimately sold. The cost of various programs, such as price promotions, rebates and coupon programs are treated as a reduction of sales. Sales of products are for cash or otherwise agreed upon credit terms. Revenue is stated net of incentives, discounts and returns. Outside of unusual circumstances, if product is returned, it is generally for failure to meet our quality standards, not caused by customer actions. Products that do not meet our high quality standards are returned and destroyed. We do not have standard terms that permit return of product. We estimate the costs for product returns and record those costs in cost of goods sold each period. We reduce revenue at the value of the original sales price in the period that the product is returned. |
Cost of Goods Sold Our cost of goods sold includes raw materials, packaging materials (including promotional packaging), manufacturing costs, plant administrative support and overheads, inbound and outbound freight charges, purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing, and internal transfer costs. |
Equity Method Accounting We generally apply the equity method of accounting to 20% to 50% owned investments where we exercise significant influence, except for certain investments that must be consolidated as variable interest entities. Equity method investments include our equity ownership in MillerCoors in the U.S. and Tradeteam, Ltd ("Tradeteam") (a transportation and logistics services company) in the U.K., along with Modelo Molson Imports, L.P. ("MMI"), BRI, Brewers' Distributor Ltd. ("BDL") and our former interests in the Montréal Canadiens and House of Blues, all in Canada. See Note 4, "Investments." There are no related parties that own interests in our equity method investments as of December 25, 2010. |
Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses Our marketing, general and administrative expenses consist of advertising, sales costs, non-manufacturing administrative, and overhead costs. The creative portion of our advertising activities is expensed as incurred. Production costs of advertising and promotional materials are generally expensed when the advertising is first run. Advertising expense was $361.6 million, $349.3 million, and $610.0 million for years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. Prepaid advertising costs of $13.4 million and $13.9 million, were included in other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, respectively. |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Canada's distribution channels are highly regulated by provincial regulation and experience few collectability problems. However, we do have direct sales to retail customers in Canada for which an allowance is recorded based upon expected collectability and historical experience. |
Trade Loans The U.K. segment extends loans to a portion of the retail outlets that sell our brands. Some of these loans provide for no interest to be payable, and others provide for payment of a below market interest rate. In return, the retail outlets receive smaller discounts on beer and other beverage products purchased from us, with the net result being the U.K. segment attaining a market return on the outstanding loan balance. We therefore reclassify a portion of beer revenue into interest income to reflect a market rate of interest on these loans. In 2010, 2009 and 2008, these amounts were $6.7 million, $8.3 million, and $10.7 million, respectively and this interest income is included in the U.K. segment. Trade loan receivables are classified as either current notes receivable and other receivables or non-current notes receivable in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 25, 2010, and December 26, 2009, total loans outstanding, net of allowances, were $48.4 million and $62.5 million, respectively. An allowance for credit losses is maintained to provide for probable loan losses related to specifically identified loans and for losses inherent in the loan portfolio that have been incurred at the balance sheet date. We establish our allowance through a provision for loan losses charged against earnings and recorded in marketing, general & administrative expenses. In determining the allowance, management analyzes the loan portfolio on an individual loan basis based on monthly performance. The evaluation is based on a review of the collectability of loans considering the nature of the portfolio, historical experience, the borrower's current repayment ability, estimated value of any underlying collateral, returns, risk profile, credit scores obtained from credit rating agencies and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires information related to these factors available at the time. The criteria are applied consistently across the trade loan portfolio and there has been no change to the policy during the year. Further, based on the monthly evaluation of loan performance, if, in management's judgment the review indicates that the loan may not be recoverable, it is classified as delinquent. Loans classified as delinquent are placed under additional scrutiny by management and if deemed uncollectible then they are passed to the company's credit management agency. Interest continues to be accrued on delinquent loans when collectability remains probable and payments received are recorded as a reduction of principal and interest. If after a period of additional scrutiny, in management's judgment the loan is not recoverable, it is written off along with any outstanding interest and any further collected payments are applied to principal. Total delinquent loans at December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009 were $12.5 million and $18.7 million, respectively. Loan balances that are written off are recorded against the allowance as a charge-off. In 2010 and 2009, total loans written off were $6.2 million and $7.7 million, respectively. Any subsequent loan recovery is recorded as a gain upon collection. A rollforward of the allowance for the year ended December 25, 2010 is as follows (in millions):
|
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out ("FIFO") method. Prior to the formation of MillerCoors, substantially all of the inventories in the United States were determined on the last-in, first-out ("LIFO") method. In the fourth quarter of 2010, we reclassified our returnable bottles and pallets from Inventories, Packaging Materials, to Properties as discussed below. We regularly assess the shelf-life of our inventories and reserve for those inventories when it becomes apparent the product will not be sold within our freshness specifications. There were no allowances for obsolete finished goods or packaging materials at December 25, 2010 or at December 26, 2009. |
Properties Properties are carried at original cost less accumulated depreciation. Certain equipment held under capital lease is classified as equipment and amortized using the straight-line method or estimated useful life, whichever is shorter over the lease term. Lease amortization is included in depreciation expense. Expenditures for new facilities and improvements that substantially extend the capacity or useful life of an asset are capitalized. Start-up costs associated with manufacturing facilities, but not related to construction, are expensed as incurred. Ordinary repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Our returnable containers (including returnable bottles, kegs and pallets) are recorded at acquisition cost and are classified within Properties. Returnable containers consist of returnable bottles, kegs and pallets that are both in our direct control within our breweries, warehouses and distributions facilities and those that we indirectly control in the market through our agreements with our customers and other brewers and for which a deposit is received. The deposits received on the Company's returnable containers in the market are recorded as deposit liabilities, included as current liabilities within Accrued Expenses and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 11, "Properties." Historically our returnable bottles and pallets were classified as current assets within Inventories, Packaging Materials. During the fourth quarter of 2010, we concluded that the classification of our returnable bottles and pallets as noncurrent assets within Properties is a preferable presentation under U.S. GAAP and is more consistent with industry practice and as such we have classified these amounts as Properties in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and adjusted our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows accordingly, reflecting the purchases of returnable bottles and pallets as investing activities. The amounts presented in our historical financial statements have also been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation as follows:
Note that the above changes do not impact the Consolidated Statements of Operations as the expense related to the returnable bottles and pallets has historically been recorded within Costs of goods sold and will continue to be classified as such. Additionally, the amounts presented in our historical quarterly financial statements have also been retrospectively adjusted to conform to the current year presentation as further discussed in Note 22, "Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)." |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments The carrying amounts of our cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value as recorded due to the short-term maturity of these instruments. In addition, the carrying amounts of our trade loan receivables approximate fair value. The fair value of long-term obligations for derivatives was estimated by discounting the future cash flows using market interest rates, adjusted for non-performance credit risk associated with our counterparties (assets) or with MCBC (liabilities). See Note 18, "Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." Based on current market rates for similar instruments, the fair value of long-term debt is presented in Note 13, "Debt." The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance for fair value, which establishes a hierarchy that prioritizes fair value measurements based on the types of inputs used for the various valuation techniques (market approach, income approach and cost approach). We utilize a combination of market and income approaches to value derivative instruments, and use an income approach for valuing our indemnity obligations. Our financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels of the hierarchy are as follows: Level 1Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are less active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs). Level 3Unobservable inputs that reflect the assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. We develop these inputs based on the best information available, including our own data. |
Foreign Currency Translation Assets and liabilities recorded in foreign currencies that are the functional currencies for the respective operations are translated at the prevailing exchange rate at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rates during the period. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income. |
Factored Brands In addition to supplying our own brands, the U.K. segment sells other beverage companies' products to on-premise customers to provide them with a full range of products for their retail outlets. These factored brand sales are included in our financial results, but the related volume is not included in our reported sales volumes. We refer to this as the "factored brand business." In the factored brand business, we normally purchase factored brand inventory, take orders from customers for such brands, and invoice customers for the product and related costs of delivery. In accordance with guidance pertaining to reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent, sales under the factored brands are generally reported on a gross income basis. |
Goodwill and Other Asset Valuation We evaluate the carrying value of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually, and we evaluate our other tangible and intangible assets for impairment when there is evidence that certain events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Significant judgments and assumptions are required in such impairment evaluations. We completed the required annual impairment testing as of June 27, 2010, the first day of our fiscal third quarter. See Note 12, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets." |
Statement of Cash Flows Data Cash equivalents represent highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. The carrying value of these investments approximates their fair value. The following presents our supplemental cash flow information:
See Note 4, "Investments," for a summary of assets and liabilities contributed to MillerCoors, the formation of which was a significant non-cash activity in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed balance sheet
Results of operations
|
|
|
Results of operations
Condensed Combined Balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents details of our intangible assets, other than goodwill, as of December 25, 2010:
The following table presents details of our intangible assets, other than goodwill, as of December 26, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Amounts recognized in AOCI are gross of taxes
Note: Amounts recognized in AOCI are gross of taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
MOLSON COORS BREWING COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|