Table of Contents

 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K

þ	 	Annual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007
OR
 	 	 	
o	 	Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	
for the transition period from                      to                      .
Commission file number: 1-07151
THE CLOROX COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 	 	 	
Delaware	 	31-0595760	
(State or other jurisdiction of	 	(I.R.S. Employer	
incorporation or organization)	 	Identification Number)	
1221 Broadway, Oakland, California 94612-1888
(Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP code)
(510) 271-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 	 	 	
Title of each class	 	Name of each exchange on which registered	
Common Stock–$1.00 par value	 	New York Stock Exchange	
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ . No o .
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o . No þ .
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ . No o .
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ            Accelerated filer o            Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o . No þ .
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates on December 31, 2006 (the last day of the most recently completed second quarter) was approximately $9.6 billion.
As of August 15, 2007, there were 138,371,089 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference:
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for the 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) to be filed within 120 days after June 30, 2007, are incorporated by reference into Part III, Items 10 through 14 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

   

 

THE CLOROX COMPANY
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Page	 	
Part I	 	Item 1.	 	Business	 	 	3	 	
 	 	Item 1.A.	 	Risk Factors	 	 	7	 	
 	 	Item 1.B.	 	Unresolved Staff Comments	 	 	15	 	
 	 	Item 2.	 	Properties	 	 	15	 	
 	 	Item 3.	 	Legal Proceedings	 	 	16	 	
 	 	Item 4.	 	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	 	 	16	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Part II	 	Item 5.	 	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	 	 	18	 	
 	 	Item 6.	 	Selected Financial Data	 	 	19	 	
 	 	Item 7.	 	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	 	 	19	 	
 	 	Item 7.A.	 	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	 	 	19	 	
 	 	Item 8.	 	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	 	 	19	 	
 	 	Item 9.	 	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	 	 	19	 	
 	 	Item 9.A.	 	Controls and Procedures	 	 	19	 	
 	 	Item 9.B.	 	Other Information	 	 	20	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Part III	 	Item 10.	 	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	 	 	21	 	
 	 	Item 11.	 	Executive Compensation	 	 	21	 	
 	 	Item 12.	 	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	 	 	21	 	
 	 	Item 13.	 	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	 	 	21	 	
 	 	Item 14.	 	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	 	 	21	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Part IV	 	Item 15.	 	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	 	 	22	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Signatures	 	 	 	 	26	 	
  EXHIBIT 21.1	
  EXHIBIT 23.1	
  EXHIBIT 31.1	
  EXHIBIT 31.2	
  EXHIBIT 32.1	
  EXHIBIT 99.1	
  EXHIBIT 99.2	
  EXHIBIT 99.3	
 2 

Table of Contents
PART I
     This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this Report), including the exhibits hereto and the information incorporated by reference herein, contains “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and such forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Except for historical information, matters discussed below, including statements about future volume, sales, costs, cost savings, earnings, cash outflows, plans, objectives, expectations, growth, or profitability, are forward looking statements based on management’s estimates, assumptions and projections. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and variations on such words, and similar expressions, are intended to identify such forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are only predictions, subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those discussed above. Important factors that could affect performance and cause results to differ materially from management’s expectations are described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Report, as updated from time to time in the Company’s SEC filings. These factors include, but are not limited to, the success of the Company’s previously announced Centennial Strategy; the final purchase price and number of shares repurchased under the Company’s accelerated share repurchase agreement; general economic and marketplace conditions and events; competitors’ actions; the Company’s costs, including changes in exposure to commodity costs such as resin, diesel, chlor-alkali and agricultural commodities; increases in energy costs; consumer and customer reaction to price increases; customer-specific ordering patterns and trends; the Company’s actual cost performance; changes in the Company’s tax rate; any future supply constraints that may affect key commodities; risks inherent in sole-supplier relationships; risks related to customer concentration; risks arising out of natural disasters; risks related to the handling and/or transportation of hazardous substances, including but not limited to chlorine; risks inherent in litigation; risks relating to international operations; risks inherent in maintaining an effective system of internal controls, including the potential impact of acquisitions or the use of third-party service providers; the ability to manage and realize the benefit of joint ventures and other cooperative relationships, including the Company’s joint venture regarding the Company’s Glad ® plastic bags, wraps and containers business, and the agreement relating to the provision of information technology and related services by a third party; the success of new products; risks relating to acquisitions, mergers and divestitures; risks relating to changes in the Company’s capital structure; and the ability of the Company to successfully manage tax, regulatory, product liability, intellectual property, environmental and other legal matters, including the risk resulting from joint and several liability for environmental contingencies. In addition, the Company’s future performance is subject to risks related to its November 2004 share exchange transaction with Henkel KGaA, the tax indemnification obligations and the actual level of debt costs. Declines in cash flow, whether resulting from tax payments, debt payments, share repurchases, interest cost increases greater than management expects, or increases in debt or changes in credit ratings, or otherwise, could adversely affect the Company’s earnings.
The Company’s forward looking statements in this report are based on management’s current views and assumptions regarding future events and speak only as of their dates. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by the federal securities laws.
In this Report, unless the context requires otherwise, the terms “the Company” and “Clorox” refer to The Clorox Company and its subsidiaries.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF BUSINESS.
The Company was founded in Oakland, Calif. in 1913 as the Electro-Alkaline Company. It was reincorporated as Clorox Chemical Corporation in 1922, as Clorox Chemical Co. in 1928 and as The Clorox Company (an Ohio corporation) in 1957, when the business was acquired by Procter & Gamble (P&G). The Company was fully divested by P&G in 1969 and, as an independent Company, reincorporated in 1973 in California as The Clorox Company. In 1986, the Company reincorporated in Delaware.
For further information on recent business developments, refer to the information set forth under the caption “Executive Overview – Fiscal Year 2007 Summary” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” on pages 1 and 2 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
 3 

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT INDUSTRY SEGMENTS.
The Company is operated through three reportable industry segments: the Household Group – North America, Specialty Group and International. The Household Group – North America segment includes U.S. laundry, cleaning, water-filtration, auto-care and professional products and all products marketed in Canada. The Specialty Group segment includes the plastic bags, wraps and containers businesses, charcoal, cat litter and food products marketed in the United States. The International segment includes operations outside the United States and Canada. Financial information for the last three fiscal years for each of the Company’s industry segments, reconciled to the consolidated results, is set forth below:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Household	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	Group –	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Fiscal	 	North	 	Specialty	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Total	
(Millions)	 	Year	 	America	 	Group	 	International	 	Corporate	 	Company	
Net sales	 	 	2007	 	 	$	2,140	 	 	$	1,990	 	 	$	717	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	4,847	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	2,113	 	 	 	1,892	 	 	 	639	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4,644	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	2,013	 	 	 	1,788	 	 	 	587	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4,388	 	
 Earnings (losses)from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	2007	 	 	$	671	 	 	$	534	 	 	$	141	 	 	$	(603	)	 	$	743	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	671	 	 	 	460	 	 	 	129	 	 	 	(607	)	 	 	653	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	629	 	 	 	435	 	 	 	123	 	 	 	(458	)	 	 	729	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Identifiable assets	 	 	2007	 	 	$	1,449	 	 	$	892	 	 	$	716	 	 	$	609	 	 	$	3,666	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	1,356	 	 	 	893	 	 	 	581	 	 	 	786	 	 	 	3,616	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	1,338	 	 	 	862	 	 	 	571	 	 	 	846	 	 	 	3,617	 	
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.
The Company is a leading manufacturer and marketer of consumer products. The Company markets some of consumers’ most trusted and recognized brand names, including its namesake bleach and cleaning products, Armor All® and STP® auto care products, Fresh Step® and Scoop Away® cat litters, Kingsford® charcoal briquets, Hidden Valley® and KC Masterpiece® dressings and sauces, Brita® water-filtration systems, and Glad® bags, wraps and containers. In addition the Company has a number of leading brands in international markets, including those sold under the Poett®, Mistolin®, and Ayudin® brand names. The Company manufactures products in more than 20 countries and markets them in more than 100 countries. The Company’s products are sold primarily through mass merchandisers and grocery, warehouse club, dollar, military and other types of retail stores.
PRINCIPAL PRODUCTS.
The products of the Household Group – North America segment include:

 	•	 	Laundry additives, including:	

 	•	 	bleaches, gels, stain removers and color-safe bleaches under the Clorox® and Clorox 2® brands; and	

 	•	 	Home-care products, including:	

 	•	 	cleaning products, such as disinfecting and sanitizing sprays and wipes, toilet-bowl cleaners, dilutable and spray glass and surface cleaners, carpet cleaners, reusable cleaning cloths, drain openers, steel-wool soap pads and scrubber sponges, mildew removers, soap-scum removers and bathroom cleaners, floor mopping systems, toilet and bath cleaning tools, daily shower cleaners and pre-moistened towelettes, primarily under the Clorox®, Formula 409®, Liquid-Plumr®, Pine-Sol®, S.O.S® and Tilex® brands.	

 	•	 	Water-filtration systems and filters under the Brita® brand.	
 		
 	•	 	Professional products for institutional, janitorial, healthcare and food-service markets, including:	
 4 

Table of Contents

 	•	 	bleaches, toilet-bowl cleaners, disinfectants, sanitizers, dish detergents, disinfecting sprays and wipes, dilutable cleaners, clog removers, cleaners, steel-wool soap pads, mildew removers, soap scum removers and bathroom cleaners primarily under the Clorox®, Formula 409®, Liquid-Plumr®, Pine-Sol®, Tilex® and S.O.S® brands. Dressings, barbecue sauces, browning sauce, food-storage bags, wraps, trash bags and charcoal briquets primarily under the Hidden Valley Ranch®, KC Masterpiece®, Kitchen Bouquet®, Glad® and Kingsford® brands.	

 	•	 	Auto-care products, including:	

 	•	 	protectants, cleaners and wipes, tire- and wheel-care products, washes, waxes and automotive fuel and oil additives, primarily under the Armor All® and STP® brands.	

 	•	 	All products marketed in Canada.	
The products of the Specialty Group segment include:

 	•	 	Plastic bags, wraps and containers, under the Glad® brand.	
 		
 	•	 	Cat litter products, including:	

 	•	 	clay (clumping and non-clumping) and silica gel-based cat litters with odor-eliminating carbon, primarily under the Fresh Step® and Scoop Away® brands.	

 	•	 	Food products, including:	

 	•	 	salad dressings and dip mixes, seasoned mini-croutons, seasonings, sauces and marinades, primarily under the Hidden Valley® and KC Masterpiece® brands.	

 	•	 	Charcoal products, including:	

 	•	 	charcoal briquets, charcoal lighter fluid and wood chips under the Kingsford® and Match Light® brands.	
The products of the International segment include:

 	•	 	In Asia-Pacific:	

 	•	 	bleaches, liquid household cleaners, sponges, scouring pads, disposable gloves, nonstick baking paper, aluminum foil, foil trays, cleaning cloths, wraps and bags, containers, auto-care products, dressings and cat litter primarily under the Glad®, Chux®, Mono®, Astra®, Armor All®, STP®, Handy Andy ® , OSO®, Yuhanrox®, Ever Clean® and Clorox® brands.	

 	•	 	In Latin America:	

 	•	 	bleaches, disinfecting wipes, waxes, auto-care products, liquid household cleaners, toilet-bowl cleaners, bathroom cleaners, disinfecting sprays, cleaning utensils, brooms, candles, air fresheners and fabric refreshers, insecticides and water filtration products primarily under the Clorox®, PinoLuz®, Blanquita®, Arela®, Emperatriz®, Lustrillo®, Mortimer®, Luminosa®, Ayudin®, Limpido®, Clorinda®, Los Conejos®, Poett®, Mistolin®, Lestoil® and Bon Bril® brands.	
The Company has two product lines that have accounted for 10% or more of total consolidated net sales during each of the past three fiscal years. Sales of Clorox® liquid bleach represented 12%, 13% and 11% of the Company’s total consolidated net sales in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Sales of Glad® trash bags represented approximately 14%, 14% and 12%, respectively, of total consolidated net sales in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005.
PRINCIPAL MARKETS – METHODS OF DISTRIBUTION. Most of the Company’s nondurable household consumer products are nationally advertised and sold within the United States to mass merchandisers, warehouse clubs and dollar, military and other types of retail stores primarily through a direct sales force, and to grocery stores and grocery wholesalers primarily through a network of brokers. Within the United States, the Company also sells institutional versions of many of its products. Outside the United States, the Company sells consumer products to the retail trade through subsidiaries, licensees, distributors and joint-venture arrangements with local partners.
 5 

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL INFORMATION ABOUT FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC OPERATIONS.
The following table shows net sales and long-lived assets by geographic area for the last three fiscal years.
Net Sales by Geographic Area:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
(Millions)	 	2007	 	2006	 	2005	
Foreign	 	$	870	 	 	$	766	 	 	$	696	 	
United States	 	 	3,977	 	 	 	3,878	 	 	 	3,692	 	
Long-Lived Assets at June 30:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
(Millions)	 	2007	 	2006	 	2005	
Foreign	 	$	129	 	 	$	117	 	 	$	116	 	
United States	 	 	847	 	 	 	887	 	 	 	883	 	
SOURCES AND AVAILABILITY OF RAW MATERIALS. The Company purchases raw materials, packaging supplies and energy from numerous unaffiliated domestic and international suppliers, some of which are sole suppliers. Interruptions in the delivery of these materials or services could adversely impact the Company. Key raw materials used by the Company include resin, chlor-alkali, linerboard, soybean oil, diesel, solvent and other chemicals. Significant raw materials were available from a sufficient number of sources during fiscal year 2007, although costs for certain raw materials were higher than prior-year levels, continuing a trend that began during the 2005 fiscal year. The Company generally utilizes supply and forward-purchase contracts to help ensure availability of raw materials at the quantity and quality standards needed in its operations. The Company is exposed to changes in the price of commodities used as raw materials in the manufacturing of its products. For further information regarding the impact of changes in commodity prices, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on pages 14 through 15 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto and “Risk Factors – Price increases in raw materials, energy, transportation and other necessary supplies or services could harm the Company’s profits” in Item 1.A.
PATENTS AND TRADEMARKS. Most of the Company’s brand name consumer products are protected by registered trademarks. Its brand names and trademarks are highly important to its business, and the Company pursues a course of vigorous action against apparent infringements. Maintenance of brand equity value is critical to the Company’s success. The Company’s patent rights are also material to its business and are asserted, where appropriate, against apparent infringements.
SEASONALITY. Most sales of the Company’s charcoal briquets and, to a lesser extent, food and auto-care product lines occur in the first six months of each calendar year. Operating cash flow is used to build inventories of those products in the off-season.
CUSTOMERS AND ORDER BACKLOG. In each of fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, net sales to the Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its domestic and international affiliates, were 26% of the Company’s total consolidated net sales. Order backlog is not a significant factor in the Company’s business.
COMPETITION. The markets for consumer products are highly competitive. Most of the Company’s products compete with other nationally advertised brands within each category and with “private label” brands and “generic” nonbranded products of grocery chains and wholesale cooperatives in certain categories. Competition is encountered from similar and alternative products, some of which are produced and marketed by major multinational or national companies having financial resources greater than those of the Company. Depending on the product, the Company’s products compete on product performance, brand recognition, price, quality or other benefits to consumers. A newly introduced consumer product (whether improved or newly developed) usually encounters intense competition requiring substantial expenditures for advertising, sales promotion and trade merchandising support. If a product gains consumer acceptance, it normally requires continued advertising and promotional support to maintain its relative market position.
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT. The Company conducts research and development primarily at its Technical Center in Pleasanton, Calif. and its research and development facility in Buenos Aires, Argentina. The Company devotes significant resources and attention to product development, process technology and researching consumer insights to develop consumer-preferred products with innovative and distinctive features. The Company incurred expenses of $108 million, $99 million and $88 million in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, on direct research activities relating to the development of new products or the maintenance and improvement of existing products. None of this research activity was customer sponsored. For further information regarding the Company’s research and development costs, see “Research and development costs” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on page 5 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
 6 

Table of Contents

ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. For information regarding noncapital expenditures related to environmental matters, see the discussions below under “Risk Factors – Environmental matters create potential liability risks” in Item 1.A. No material capital expenditures relating to environmental compliance are presently anticipated.
NUMBER OF PERSONS EMPLOYED. At June 30, 2007, the Company employed approximately 7,800 people.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are available on the Company’s Internet Web site, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. These reports are available at www.thecloroxcompany.com under Investors/Financial Information/SEC Filings. Information relating to corporate governance at Clorox, including the Company’s Code of Conduct, Board of Directors Governance Guidelines and Board Committee charters, including charters for the Management Development and Compensation Committee, the Audit Committee, the Finance Committee and the Nominating and Governance Committee, is available at www.thecloroxcompany.com under Company Information/Corporate Governance. The Company will provide any of the foregoing information without charge upon written request to Manager of Corporate External Communications, The Clorox Company, 1221 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612-1888. The information contained on the Company’s Internet Web site is not included as a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Report.
ITEM 1.A. RISK FACTORS
The following risks and uncertainties, as well as other factors described elsewhere in this Report or in other filings by the Company with the SEC, could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties that are not currently known to the Company or that are not currently believed by the Company to be material may also harm the Company’s business operations and financial results.
The Company’s operating results and net earnings may not meet expectations.
The Company cannot be certain that its operating results and net earnings will meet its expectations. If the Company’s assumptions and estimates are incorrect or do not come to fruition, or if the Company does not achieve all of its key goals, then its actual performance could vary materially from its expectations. The Company’s operating results and net earnings may be influenced by a number of factors, including the following:

 	•	 	the introduction of new products and line extensions by the Company or its competitors;	
 		
 	•	 	the mix of products with varying profitability sold in a given quarter;	
 		
 	•	 	the mix of products sold within channels and different countries with varying profitability in a given quarter;	
 		
 	•	 	the Company’s ability to control internal costs;	
 		
 	•	 	significant increases in the costs of energy, transportation or key raw materials including but not limited to resin, chlor-alkali, linerboard, soybean oil, diesel, solvent and other chemicals;	
 		
 	•	 	the effectiveness of the Company’s advertising, marketing and promotional programs;	
 		
 	•	 	changes in product pricing by the Company or its competitors;	
 		
 	•	 	consumer and customer reaction to price increases;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to execute its strategy;	
 		
 	•	 	the availability and cost of debt financing;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to maintain and enhance profits in the face of a consolidating retail environment;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to successfully implement and achieve the expected benefits of its process improvement initiatives;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to achieve its business plans, including volume growth and pricing plans, as a result of high levels of competitive activity;	
 7 

Table of Contents

 	•	 	the ability of the Company to penetrate and grow international markets;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to maintain key retail customer relationships;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to generate expected cost savings and efficiencies;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to maintain the value of its brands;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to successfully manage regulatory, tax and legal matters, including resolution of pending matters within current estimates;	
 		
 	•	 	changes to cash flow resulting from tax payments, tax settlements and share repurchases;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to manage inventory at appropriate levels, including decisions regarding obsolescence;	
 		
 	•	 	the impact of any litigation or product liability claims;	
 		
 	•	 	fluctuations in federal, state, local and foreign taxes;	
 		
 	•	 	expenses for impairment and obsolescence of property, plant and equipment in excess of projections;	
 		
 	•	 	expenses for impairment of goodwill, trademarks and other intangible assets and equity investments in excess of projections;	
 		
 	•	 	charges resulting from any restructuring that management may, from time to time, choose to undertake;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability of the Company to make up for lost revenues resulting from divestitures;	
 		
 	•	 	the impact of changing accounting principles and standards;	
 		
 	•	 	significant increases in interest rates, insurance costs, or in pension, healthcare or other employee benefit costs;	
 		
 	•	 	the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel;	
 		
 	•	 	the impact of environmental remediation costs, including those for which the Company is jointly and severally liable;	
 		
 	•	 	the impact of currency fluctuations;	
 		
 	•	 	the impact of foreign import and export restrictions or other trade regulations; and	
 		
 	•	 	the impact of general economic conditions in the United States and in other countries in which the Company currently does business.	
In addition, sales volume growth, whether due to acquisitions or to internal growth, can place burdens on management resources and financial controls that, in turn, can have a negative impact on operating results and net earnings. To some extent, the Company sets its expense levels in anticipation of future revenues. If actual revenue falls short of these expectations, operating results and net earnings are likely to be adversely affected.
The Company faces intense competition in its markets, which could lead to reduced profitability.
The Company faces intense competition from consumer product companies both in the U.S. and in its international markets. Most of the Company’s products compete with other widely-advertised brands within each product category and with “private label” brands and “generic” nonbranded products of grocery chains and wholesale cooperatives in certain categories, which typically are sold at lower prices. The Company also encounters competition from similar and alternative products, many of which are produced and marketed by major multinational or national companies.
The Company’s products generally compete on the basis of product performance, brand recognition, price, quality or other benefits to consumers. Advertising, promotion, merchandising and packaging also have a significant impact on consumer purchasing decisions. A newly introduced consumer product (whether improved or newly developed) usually encounters intense competition requiring substantial expenditures for advertising, sales promotion and trade merchandising. If a product gains consumer acceptance, it normally requires continued advertising and promotional support to maintain its relative market position.
 8 

Table of Contents

Some of the Company’s competitors are larger and have financial resources greater than those of the Company. These competitors may be able to spend more aggressively on advertising and promotional activities, introduce competing products more quickly and respond more effectively to changing business and economic conditions than the Company can. In addition, the Company’s competitors may attempt to gain market share by offering products at prices at or below those typically offered by the Company. Competitive activity may require the Company to increase its spending on advertising and promotions or reduce prices and could lead to reduced profits and could adversely affect growth.
Volume growth may be difficult to achieve.
A large percentage of the Company’s revenues come from mature markets that are subject to increased competition. During fiscal year 2007, approximately 82% of the Company’s net sales were generated in U.S. markets. U.S. markets for household products are considered mature and are generally characterized by high household penetration. The Company’s ability to achieve volume growth will depend on its ability to drive growth through innovation and investment in its established brands and its ability to capture market share from competitors. In addition, price increases may slow volume growth or create declines in volume in the short term as consumers adjust to price increases. If the Company is unable to increase market share in existing product lines, or develop innovation to grow its product categories, or develop, acquire or successfully launch new products, it may not achieve its volume growth objectives.
Price increases in raw materials, energy, transportation and other necessary supplies or services could harm the Company’s profits.
Significant increases in the cost of raw materials including resin, chlor-alkali, linerboard, soybean oil, solvent and other miscellaneous chemicals, or increases in the cost of energy, transportation and other necessary services, may harm the Company’s profits and operating results. In particular, during fiscal years 2006 and 2005, the Company experienced unprecedented levels of price increases for certain of its raw materials and diesel fuel and energy costs, primarily as a result of supply interruptions caused by hurricanes Katrina and Rita and strong demand versus available supply. This challenging commodity environment continued through fiscal year 2007, and the Company also experienced increases in agricultural commodity prices in fiscal year 2007. If price increases for any of the primary raw materials or other necessary supplies or services occur and the Company is not able to increase the prices of its products or achieve cost savings to offset such price increases, its profits and operating results may be harmed. In addition, if the Company increases the prices of its product in response to increases in commodities costs, and the commodity costs decline, the Company may not be able to sustain its price increases.
In addition, in some cases, the Company relies on a limited number of suppliers or sole suppliers for its raw materials or other necessary supplies. If the Company is unable to maintain supplier arrangements and relations or if it is unable to contract with suppliers at the quantity and quality levels needed for its business, it could experience disruptions in production and its financial results could be adversely affected. For further information regarding the impact of changes in commodity prices, see “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on pages 14 and 15 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
The Company may not successfully develop and introduce new products and line extensions.
The Company’s future performance and growth depends on its ability to successfully develop and introduce new products and line extensions. The Company cannot be certain that it will successfully achieve those goals. The development and introduction of new products requires substantial and effective research, development and marketing expenditures, which the Company may be unable to recoup if the new products do not gain widespread market acceptance. New product development and marketing efforts have inherent risks, including product development or launch delays, which could result in the Company not being first to market, the failure of new products and line extensions to achieve anticipated levels of market acceptance, and the cost of failed product introductions.
 9 

Table of Contents

Loss of a significant customer could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
A limited number of customers account for a large percentage of the Company’s net sales. The Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its domestic and international affiliated companies, accounted for approximately 26% of the Company’s net sales during fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005. During fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company’s five largest customers accounted for 42%, 41% and 40% of its total consolidated net sales, respectively. The Company expects that a significant portion of its revenues will continue to be derived from a small number of customers and that these percentages may increase if the growth of mass merchandisers continues. As a result, changes in the strategies of the Company’s largest customers, including a reduction in the number of brands they carry or a shift of shelf space to “private-label” or competitors’ products, may harm the Company’s sales. In addition, the Company’s business is based primarily upon individual sales orders, and the Company typically does not enter into long-term contracts with its customers. Accordingly, these customers could reduce their purchasing levels or cease buying products from the Company at any time and for any reason. If the Company ceases doing business with a significant customer or if sales of its products to a significant customer materially decrease the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed.
Failure to effectively respond to customer demands could adversely affect the Company’s margins and results of operations.
In recent years, the Company experienced a consumer purchasing trend away from traditional grocers and toward mass merchandisers, which include super centers and dollar and club stores. This trend resulted in the increased size and influence of these mass merchandisers, who may demand lower pricing or special packaging, or impose other requirements on product suppliers. These business demands may relate to inventory practices, logistics, or other aspects of the customer-supplier relationship. If the Company does not effectively respond to the demands of these mass merchandisers as well as to those of traditional grocers, they could decrease their purchases from the Company, causing the Company’s sales and profits to decline.
Acquisitions and new venture investments may not be successful.
In connection with the Company’s Centennial Strategy, it may seek to increase growth through acquisitions. Not only is the identification of good acquisition candidates difficult and competitive, but these transactions also involve numerous risks, including the ability to:

 	•	 	successfully integrate acquired companies, products or personnel into the Company’s existing business;	
 		
 	•	 	achieve expected synergies and obtain the desired financial or strategic benefits from acquisitions;	
 		
 	•	 	retain key relationships with employees, customers, partners and suppliers of acquired companies; and	
 		
 	•	 	maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies throughout acquired companies.	
Companies or operations acquired or joint ventures created may not be profitable or may not achieve sales levels and profitability that justify the investments made. Future acquisitions could also result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities and/or amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets and increased operating expenses, which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. In addition, to the extent that the economic benefits associated with any of the Company’s acquisitions diminish in the future, the Company may be required to record additional write-downs of goodwill, intangible assets or other assets associated with such acquisitions, which could adversely affect its operating results.
In addition, any future new venture investments may not be successful. In fiscal year 2008, the Company will terminate certain new venture investments resulting in charges related to the write-down of such investments. For additional information, see “Restructuring and asset impairment costs” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on pages 5 and 6 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
 10 

Table of Contents

Operations outside the United States expose the Company to uncertain conditions and other risks in international markets.
The Company’s sales outside the United States were approximately 18% of net sales in fiscal year 2007, and its strategy includes expanding its international business. As of June 30, 2007, the Company owned and operated 21 manufacturing facilities outside the United States. The Company has and will continue to face substantial risks associated with having foreign operations, including:

 	•	 	economic or political instability in its international markets, particularly in Colombia and Venezuela;	
 		
 	•	 	restrictions on or costs relating to the repatriation of foreign profits to the United States; and	
 		
 	•	 	the imposition of tariffs or trade restrictions.	
These risks could have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to sell its products on a competitive basis in international markets and may have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial position. The Company’s small volume in some countries, relative to some multinational and local competitors, could exacerbate such risks.
Also, the Company’s operations outside the United States are subject to risks relating to appropriate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in local jurisdictions, potential difficulties in staffing and managing local operations, potentially higher incidence of fraud or corruption, credit risk of local customers and distributors, and potentially adverse tax consequences.
The Company is also exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk with respect to its sales, profits, assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Although the Company uses instruments to hedge certain foreign currency risks, it is not fully protected against foreign currency fluctuations and its reported earnings will be affected by changes in foreign exchange rates.
The share exchange with Henkel KGaA (Henkel) could result in significant tax liability.
On November 22, 2004, the Company completed the exchange of its ownership interest in a subsidiary for Henkel’s approximately 61.4 million shares of the Company’s common stock, which represented approximately 29% of the Company’s common stock prior to the exchange. At the time of the share exchange with Henkel, the Company received an opinion from its special tax counsel to the effect that, among other things, the share exchange should qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and that the Company should recognize no gain or loss upon the distribution of its subsidiary’s stock to Henkel for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In addition, at the time of the share exchange, Henkel received an opinion from its special tax counsel to the effect that, among other things, the share exchange of the subsidiary’s stock to Henkel should qualify as a tax-free distribution under Section 355 of the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes. These opinions were based in part upon various factual representations that Henkel and the Company made. The Company is not aware of any facts or circumstances that would cause such representations to be untrue or incomplete in any material respect. Nonetheless, the Company cannot be certain that the share exchange will qualify for tax-free treatment to it or to Henkel. The Company did not apply for an advance tax ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the share exchange. Opinions of counsel are not binding on the IRS, and the conclusions expressed in the opinions could be challenged by the IRS.
In general, the Company agreed to be responsible for Henkel’s taxes on the transaction if the Company’s actions result in a breach of the representations and warranties in a manner that causes the share exchange to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment. Henkel agreed to similar obligations. It is expected that the amount of any such taxes to Henkel and to the Company would be substantial. Although certain of the taxes described above would be imposed on Henkel, the Company would, in certain circumstances, be liable for all or a portion of such taxes. See “Risk Factors–If the share exchange with Henkel is treated as a taxable transaction, and the Company is required to indemnify Henkel for certain tax liabilities pursuant to the tax matters agreement, it could materially affect the Company’s liquidity.”
If the share exchange with Henkel is treated as a taxable transaction, and the Company is required to indemnify Henkel for certain tax liabilities pursuant to the tax matters agreement, it could materially affect the Company’s liquidity.
In general, pursuant to the tax matters agreement that the Company entered into with Henkel in connection with the share exchange, the Company agreed to be responsible for any taxes, including the taxes of Henkel, that result from certain of the Company’s actions or that result from the Company’s breach of a representation or a covenant that it has given in connection with the tax opinion delivered to the Company by its special tax counsel and the tax opinion delivered to Henkel by its special tax counsel, described above, in a manner that causes the share exchange to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the Code. Henkel has agreed to similar obligations in the tax matters agreement. The Company’s indemnification obligations to Henkel are not limited in amount or subject to any cap. If the Company is required to indemnify Henkel under the circumstances set forth in the tax matters agreement, it may be subject to substantial liabilities that may materially affect its liquidity and, therefore, its ability to service the senior notes it issued in connection with the share exchange.
 11 

Table of Contents

Resolutions of tax disputes may impact the Company’s earnings and cash flow.
Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s effective tax rate and in evaluating its tax positions. The Company establishes accruals for certain tax contingencies when, despite the belief that its tax return positions are fully supported, it believes that certain positions will be challenged and that its positions may not be fully sustained. The tax-contingency accruals are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law development and emerging legislation. The Company’s effective tax rate includes the impact of tax-contingency accruals and changes to the accruals, including related interest and penalties, as considered appropriate by management. When particular matters arise, a number of years may elapse before such matters are audited and finally resolved. Favorable resolution of such matters could be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could increase the effective tax rate. Any resolution of a tax issue may require the use of cash in the year of resolution.
The IRS has completed audits of the Company’s income tax returns through the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002. In April 2005, the Company announced an agreement with the IRS resolving certain tax issues arising in the period from 1997 through 2000. As a result, the Company paid federal and state taxes and interest of $94 million and $151 million during fiscal years 2005 and 2006, respectively. These payments negatively impacted the Company’s cash flows. The Company had previously accrued for this contingency and released tax-contingency accruals associated with this settlement in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. In June 2007, the Company settled remaining federal tax issues in its fiscal 1997 through 2000 tax years. The Company is in the process of negotiating tax issues for the fiscal year 2001-2002 period, and has settled, or is near settlement of, most of the significant tax issues in that period. Resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material impact on earnings or cash flow. For additional information, refer to the information set forth in Note 19 – Income Taxes of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 48 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109 . For additional information, refer to the information set forth in “New Accounting Pronouncements” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on page 15 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
Government regulations could impose material costs.
Generally, the manufacture, packaging, labeling, storage, distribution and advertising of the Company’s products and the conduct of its business operations must all comply with extensive federal, state and foreign laws and regulations. For example, in the United States, many of the Company’s products are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Food and Drug Administration and the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the Company’s product claims and advertising are regulated by the Federal Trade Commission. In addition, security at certain of our facilities is regulated by the Department of Homeland Security. Most states have agencies that regulate in parallel to these federal agencies. In addition, the Company’s international operations are subject to regulation in each of the foreign jurisdictions in which it manufactures or distributes its products. During the past two years, the Company experienced an increase in the number of regulatory inspections at its facilities in the U.S. If the Company is found to be out of compliance with applicable laws and regulations in these or other areas, it could be subject to civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls or asset seizures, as well as potential criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on its business. Loss of or failure to obtain necessary permits and registrations could delay or prevent the Company from meeting current product demand, introducing new products, building new facilities or acquiring new businesses and could adversely affect operating results, particularly with respect to its charcoal business. It is possible that the federal government will increase regulation of the transportation, storage or use of certain chemicals to enhance homeland security or protect the environment and that such regulation could negatively impact the Company’s ability to obtain raw material or increase costs.
Product liability claims could adversely affect the Company’s sales and operating results.
The Company may be required to pay for losses or injuries purportedly caused by its products. Claims could be based on allegations that, among other things, the Company’s products contain contaminants, provide inadequate instructions regarding their use, or inadequate warnings concerning interactions with other substances. Product liability claims could result in negative publicity that could harm the Company’s sales and operating results. In addition, if one of the Company’s products is found to be defective, the Company could be required to recall it, which could result in adverse publicity and significant expenses. Although the Company maintains product liability insurance coverage, potential product liability claims may exceed the amount of insurance coverage or certain product liability claims may be excluded under the terms of the policy.
 12 

Table of Contents

Environmental matters create potential liability risks.
The Company must comply with various environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which it operates, including those relating to air emissions, water discharges, the handling and disposal of solid and hazardous wastes and the remediation of contamination associated with the use and disposal of hazardous substances. The Company is currently involved in or has potential liability with respect to the remediation of past contamination in the operation of some of its currently and formerly owned and leased facilities. In addition, some of its present and former facilities have been or had been in operation for many years and, over that time, some of these facilities may have used substances or generated and disposed of wastes that are or may be considered hazardous. It is possible that those sites, as well as disposal sites owned by third parties to whom the Company has sent waste, may in the future be identified and become the subject of remediation. It is possible that the Company could become subject to additional environmental liabilities in the future that could result in a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition.
At June 30, 2007, the Company had a recorded liability of $23 million for its future remediation costs. One matter in Dickinson County, Michigan, for which the Company is jointly and severally liable, accounts for a substantial majority of the recorded liability. The Company is subject to a cost-sharing arrangement with another party for this matter, and the Company has agreed to be liable for 24.3% of the aggregate remediation and associated costs, other than legal fees, as it and the other party are each responsible for their own such fees. The other party in this matter reported a substantial net loss for calendar year 2006. If the other party with whom the Company shares joint and several liability is unable to pay its share of the response and remediation obligations, the Company would likely be responsible for such obligations. In October 2004, the Company and the other party agreed to a consent judgment with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, which sets forth certain remediation goals and monitoring activities. Based on the current status of this matter, and with the assistance of environmental consultants, the Company maintains an undiscounted liability representing its best estimate of its share of costs associated with the capital expenditures, maintenance and other costs to be incurred over an estimated 30-year remediation period. The most significant components of the liability relate to the estimated costs associated with the remediation of groundwater contamination and excess levels of subterranean methane deposits. Currently, the Company cannot accurately predict the timing of the payments that will likely be made under this estimated obligation. In addition, the estimated loss exposure is sensitive to a variety of uncertain factors, including the efficacy of remediation efforts, changes in remediation requirements and the timing, varying costs and alternative clean-up technologies that may become available in the future. Although it is possible that the Company’s exposure may exceed the amount recorded, any amount of such additional exposures, or range of exposures, is not estimable at this time.
The Company also handles and/or transports hazardous substances, including but not limited to chlorine, at its plant sites, including the rail transit of liquid chlorine from its point of origin to our manufacturing facilities. A release of such chemicals, whether in transit or at our facilities, due to accident or an intentional act, could result in substantial liability. The Company has incurred, and will continue to incur, capital and operating expenditures and other costs in complying with environmental laws and regulations and in providing physical security for its worldwide operations.
Failure to maximize or to successfully assert the Company’s intellectual property rights could impact its competitiveness.
The Company relies on trademark, trade secret, patent and copyright laws to protect its intellectual property rights. The Company cannot be sure that these intellectual property rights will be maximized or that they can be successfully asserted. There is a risk that the Company will not be able to obtain and perfect its own or, where appropriate, license intellectual property rights necessary to support new product introductions. The Company cannot be certain that these rights, if obtained, will not be invalidated, circumvented or challenged in the future, and the Company could incur significant costs in connection with legal actions to defend its intellectual property rights. In addition, even if such rights are obtained in the United States, the laws of some of the other countries in which the Company’s products are or may be sold do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. If other parties infringe the Company’s intellectual property rights, they may dilute the value of its brands in the marketplace, which could diminish the value that consumers associate with the Company’s brands and harm its sales. The failure to perfect or successfully assert its intellectual property rights could make the Company less competitive and could have a material adverse effect on its business, operating results and financial condition.
If the Company is found to have infringed the intellectual property rights of others, its competitiveness could be negatively impacted.
If the Company is found to have violated the trademark, trade secret, copyright, patent or other intellectual property rights of others, such a finding could result in the need to cease use of a trademark, trade secret, copyrighted work or patented invention in the Company’s business and the obligation to pay a substantial amount for past infringement. It could also be necessary to pay a substantial amount in the future if the rights holders are willing to permit the Company to continue to use the intellectual property rights. Either having to cease use or pay such amounts could make the Company less competitive and could have a material adverse impact on its business, operating results and financial condition.
 13 

Table of Contents

The Company’s substantial indebtedness could adversely affect its operations and financial results and prevent the Company from fulfilling its obligations.
The Company has a significant amount of indebtedness. As of June 30, 2007, the Company had $2.0 billion of debt. In August 2007, the Company incurred additional debt in connection with its accelerated share repurchase program, which it financed through its existing cash flows and the issuance of commercial paper.
The Company’s substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:

 	•	 	make it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its cash obligations;	
 		
 	•	 	increase the Company’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;	
 		
 	•	 	limit the Company’s ability to fund potential acquisitions;	
 		
 	•	 	require the Company to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from operations to payments on its indebtedness, which would reduce the availability of its cash flow to fund working capital requirements, capital expenditures, expansion efforts and other general corporate purposes;	
 		
 	•	 	limit the Company’s flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in its business and the industry in which it operates;	
 		
 	•	 	place the Company at a competitive disadvantage compared to its competitors that have less debt; and	
 		
 	•	 	limit, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in the Company’s indebtedness, among other things, its ability to borrow additional funds. Failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default that, if not cured or waived, could have a significant adverse effect on the Company.	
The Company may not have sufficient cash to service its indebtedness and pay cash dividends.
The Company’s ability to make payments on and to refinance its indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures and expansion efforts will depend on its ability to generate cash in the future. In addition, the Company’s ability to pay cash dividends will depend on its ability to generate cash and net profits (as defined by Delaware law). The ability to generate cash and net profits, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond the Company’s control.
The Company may incur substantially more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks described above.
The Company may incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future to fund acquisitions, to repurchase shares or to fund other activities for general business purposes. As of June 30, 2007, approximately $1.3 billion was available to borrow under the Company’s $1.3 billion revolving credit facility. In August 2007, the Company incurred additional debt in connection with its accelerated share repurchase program, which it financed through its existing cash flows and the issuance of commercial paper. If new debt is added to the current debt levels, the related risks that the Company now faces could intensify. In addition, the cost of incurring additional debt could increase due to possible additional downgrades in the Company’s credit rating.
The Company’s manufacturing and other facilities may be subject to disruption from events beyond the Company’s control.
Operations at the Company’s manufacturing facilities may be subject to disruption for a variety of reasons, including work stoppages, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics, fire, earthquake, flooding or other natural disasters. In addition, the Company’s corporate headquarters and Technical Center are located near major earthquake fault lines in California. If a major disruption were to occur, it could result in harm to people or the natural environment, temporary loss of access to critical data, delays in shipments of products to customers or suspension of operations.
Failure to meet market expectations could impact the Company’s stock price.
The market price for the Company’s stock is based, in part, on market expectations for the Company’s sales growth, earning per share and cash flow. Failure to meet these expectations could cause the market price of the Company’s stock to decline rapidly and sharply.
 14 

Table of Contents

The Company’s continued growth and expansion could adversely affect its internal control over financial reporting, which could harm its business and financial results.
Clorox management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the Company’s transactions, providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures are made in accordance with management’s authorization, and providing reasonable assurance that the unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements would be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of the Company’s financial statements would be prevented or detected. The Company’s continuing growth and expansion in domestic and globally dispersed markets will place significant additional pressure on the Company’s system of internal control over financial reporting. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit the Company’s ability to report its financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud.
ITEM 1.B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
PRODUCTION AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES. The Company owns and operates 24 manufacturing facilities in the United States, 12 of which primarily serve the Household Group–North America segment and 12 of which primarily serve the Specialty Group segment. The Company owns and operates 22 manufacturing facilities internationally, which primarily serve the International segment. The Company also leases six regional distribution centers in the United States, which serve primarily the Household Group–North America and Specialty Group segments, and leases and operates one regional distribution center in Canada. Management believes the Company’s production and distribution facilities, together with additional facilities owned or leased and operated by various unaffiliated finished product suppliers and distribution center service providers that serve the Company, are adequate to support the business efficiently and that the Company’s properties and equipment have generally been well maintained. The Company has announced a supply chain restructuring that it expects to complete by fiscal year 2010 which involves closing certain domestic and international manufacturing facilities. For additional information, see “Restructuring and asset impairment costs” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” on pages 5 and 6 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
OFFICES AND RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT FACILITIES. The Company owns its general office building located in Oakland, Calif. The Company also owns its Technical Center and Data Center located in Pleasanton, California. The Company leases its research and development center and its engineering research facilities, which are located in Willowbrook, Ill., Cincinnati, Oh. and Kennesaw, Ga., respectively and its research and development facility at its plant in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Leased sales and other facilities are located at a number of other locations.
ENCUMBRANCES . None of the Company’s owned facilities are encumbered to secure debt owed by the Company.
 15 

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On August 4, 2006, a derivative action purportedly on behalf of the Company was filed in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County, against certain current and former directors and officers of the Company. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties and waste of corporate assets. These allegations relate to the non-cash compensation expense the Company recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, following a review of its stock option practices. The complaint demands, among other forms of relief, judgment in the form of monetary damages sustained by the Company as a result of such practices. On September 1, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the case. On November 3, 2006, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming additional defendants and asserting additional claims including allegations of violations of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On December 1, 2006, the Company removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On December 22, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On April 27, 2007, the parties entered into a stipulation whereby they agreed, subject to court approval, that the amended complaint will be dismissed and that the plaintiff will have until May 30, 2007, to demand that the Board of Directors pursue the claims in the amended complaint on behalf of the Company. The plaintiff has sent the Board a demand letter and the Board is currently reviewing this matter. The plaintiff will have 30 days from the date of the Board’s response to this demand letter in which to file a second amended complaint challenging the Board’s decision.
While there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of this action, the Company does not believe that its resolution will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flow. Since the Company believes that the likelihood of sustaining a material loss is remote, the Company has not accrued a liability at June 30, 2007.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The names, ages, year elected to current position and current titles of the executive officers of the Company as of July 31, 2007, are set forth below:
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Name, Age and	 	 	
Year Elected to Current Position	 	Title	
D.R. Knauss	 	56	 	2006	 	Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer	
L.S. Peiros	 	52	 	2007	 	Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer – North America	
M.B. Springer	 	43	 	2007	 	Executive Vice President – Strategy & Growth	
F.A. Tataseo	 	53	 	2007	 	Executive Vice President –Functional Operations	
D.J. Heinrich	 	51	 	2004	 	Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer	
J.P. Kane	 	55	 	2005	 	Senior Vice President – Human Resources & Corporate Affairs	
L. Stein	 	45	 	2005	 	Senior Vice President – General Counsel	
W. Every-Burns	 	54	 	2006	 	Senior Vice President – International	
There is no family relationship between any of the above-named persons, or between any of such persons and any of the directors of the Company. See Item 10 of Part III of this Report for additional information regarding the Company’s executive officers.
D.R. Knauss was elected chairman and chief executive officer of the Company in October 2006. He was executive vice president of The Coca-Cola Company and president and chief operating officer for Coca-Cola North America from February 2004 until August 2006. Previously, he was president of the Retail Division of Coca-Cola North America from January 2003 through February 2004 and president and chief executive officer of The Minute Maid Company, a division of The Coca-Cola Company from January 2000 until January 2003. Prior to that, he held various positions in marketing and sales with PepsiCo, Inc. and Procter & Gamble and served as an officer in the United States Marine Corps.
L. S. Peiros was elected executive vice president and chief operating officer — North America effective January 2007. He joined the Company in 1981 as a brand assistant. From January 1999 through January 2007, he served as group vice president — household. He served as vice president — corporate marketing services from September 1993 until July 1995, vice president — food products from July 1995 through June 1998, and vice president — household products from June 1998 through January 1999.
 16 

Table of Contents

M. B. Springer was elected executive vice president — strategy & growth effective January 2007. She joined the Company in August 1990 as an assistant marketing manager. From January 2005 through January 2007, she served as group vice president — specialty. She served as vice president, marketing for Glad products from October 1999 through September 2002 and as vice president, general manager of Glad products from October 2002 through December 2004.
F. A. Tataseo was elected executive vice president — functional operations effective January 2007. He joined the Company in October 1994 as vice president — sales. From July 2004 through January 2007, he served as group vice president — functional operations. He served as vice president — sales from October 1994 through September 1999 and as senior vice president — sales from September 1999 through June 2004.
D. J. Heinrich was elected senior vice president — chief financial officer effective July 2004. He joined the Company in March 2001 as vice president — controller. He was elected vice president — chief financial officer in October 2003. From October 1996 through February 2001, he was employed by Transamerica Corporation, most recently as senior vice president — treasurer, Transamerica Finance Corporation. Prior to that, he was employed by Granite Management Corporation, an indirect subsidiary of Ford Motor Company, as senior vice president — treasurer and controller.
J. P. Kane was elected senior vice president — human resources & corporate affairs effective January 2005. She joined the Company as vice president — human resources in March 2004 and was elected senior vice president — human resources in July 2004. From September 2000 to February 2004, she was employed by Hewlett-Packard Company, most recently as vice president of executive leadership and human resources for corporate functions. Prior to that, she was employed by Bank of America from 1978 to September 2000, most recently as senior vice president of human resources.
L. Stein was elected senior vice president — general counsel effective January 2005. She also served as secretary from September 2005 through May 2007. From January 2000 through January 2005, she was senior vice president — general counsel for H.J. Heinz Company. Immediately prior to that, she spent eight years working for the Company, lastly as its assistant general counsel responsible for regulatory affairs.
W. Every-Burns was elected senior vice president — international effective January 2006. He joined the Company in 1990 as the general manager, sales and marketing — Glad Australia. From January 2005 through January 2006 he served as vice president — general manager, international. From February 1999 through December 2002, he served as vice president — general manager, Australia and New Zealand, and from January 2003 through December 2004 he served as vice president — general manager, Asia Pacific Division.
 17 

Table of Contents
PART II

ITEM 5.	 	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	
MARKET INFORMATION.
The Company’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange. The high and low sales prices quoted for the New York Stock Exchange-Composite Transactions Report for each quarterly period during the past two fiscal years appear in Note 23 – Unaudited Quarterly Data of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which appears on pages 57 and 58 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
HOLDERS.
The number of record holders of the Company’s common stock as of July 31, 2007, was 12,526 based on information provided by the Company’s transfer agent.
DIVIDENDS.
The amount of quarterly dividends paid with respect to the Company’s common stock during the past two fiscal years appears in Note 23 – Unaudited Quarterly Data of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which appears on pages 57 and 58 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION.
This information appears in Part III, Item 12 hereof.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
The following table sets out the purchases of the Company’s securities by the Company and any affiliated purchasers within the meaning of Rule 10b-18(a)(3) (17 CFR 240.10b-18(a)(3)) during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007.
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	[a]	 	[b]	 	[c]	 	[d]	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Maximum Number (or	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Total Number of	 	Approximate Dollar	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Shares (or Units)	 	Value) of Shares (or	
 	 	Total Number of	 	 	 	 	 	Purchased as Part of	 	Units that May Yet Be	
 	 	Shares (or Units)	 	Average Price Paid	 	Publicly Announced	 	Purchased Under the	
Period	 	Purchased(1)	 	per Share (or Unit)	 	Plans or Programs	 	Plans or Programs(2)	
 	
April 1 to 30, 2007	 	 	1,075	 	 	$	64.42	 	 	 	—	 	 	$	767,723,099	 	
May 1 to 31, 2007	 	 	141,788	 	 	$	67.04	 	 	 	140,000	 	 	$	750,000,000	 	
June 1 to 30, 2007	 	 	860,571	 	 	$	65.91	 	 	 	860,000	 	 	$	750,000,000	 	

(1)	 	The shares purchased in April 2007 relate entirely to the surrender to the Company of shares of common stock to satisfy withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. Of the shares purchased in May 2007, 140,000 shares were acquired pursuant to the Company’s share repurchase program to offset the potential impact of dilution resulting from share-based awards. The remaining 1,788 shares relate to the surrender to the Company of shares of common stock to satisfy withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. Of the shares purchased in June 2007, 860,000 shares were acquired pursuant to the share repurchase program to offset the potential impact of dilution resulting from the exercise of stock options. Of the remaining 571 shares purchased in June 2007, 168 relate to the surrender to the Company of shares of common stock to satisfy withholding obligations in connection with the vesting of restricted stock granted to employees. The remaining 403 shares purchased were surrenders to the Company of already-owned shares of common stock to pay the exercise price or to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of employee stock options.	
 18 

Table of Contents

			
(2)	 	On May 24, 2007 the board of directors approved a $750,000,000 share repurchase program and canceled a $500,000,000 share repurchase program originally authorized on July 17, 2002 and a $700,000,000 share repurchase program originally authorized on July 16, 2003. At May 24, 2007, $67,723,099 and $700,000,000 remained available for repurchases under the programs originally authorized on July 17, 2002 and July 16, 2003, respectively. As of June 30, 2007, $750,000,000 remains available for repurchase under the program authorized on May 24, 2007. On September 1, 1999, the Company announced a share repurchase program to reduce or eliminate dilution upon the issuance of shares pursuant to the Company’s stock compensation plans. The program initiated in 1999 has no specified cap and, therefore, is not included in column [d] above. None of these programs has a specified termination date. On August 13, 2007, the Company announced its agreement to purchase $750,000,000 in shares of its common stock under an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) program. Final settlement of the ASR program is scheduled to take place by January 2008. The final number of shares the Company is repurchasing under the terms of the agreement and the timing of the final settlement will depend on prevailing market conditions, the final discounted volume weighted average share price over the term of the ASR program and any other customary adjustments.	
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
This information appears under “Five-Year Financial Summary,” on page 62 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This information appears under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” on pages 3 through 10 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 7.A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
This information appears under “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk” in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” on pages 14 and 15 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
These statements and data appear on pages 21 through 62 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
ITEM 9.A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
 19 

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management considered the impact of restructuring activities (see Note 3 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” of Exhibit 99.1 hereto) and the purchase of bleach businesses in Canada and certain Latin America countries (see Note 4 of the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” of Exhibit 99.1 hereto), which are the only significant events that caused changes in internal control over financial reporting in the most recently completed fiscal quarter, and concluded that these events did not result in any material effect, nor are they reasonably likely to result in any material future effect, to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
There was no other change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting is set forth on page 59 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto, and is incorporated herein by reference. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, has been audited by Ernst & Young, LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which appears on page 61 of Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
ITEM 9.B. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
 20 

Table of Contents
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, information regarding the executive officers of the registrant is reported in Part I of this Report.
The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer and controller, among others. The Code of Conduct is located on the Company’s Internet Web site at www.thecloroxcompany.com under Company Information/Corporate Governance. The Company intends to satisfy the requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding disclosure of amendments to, or waivers from, provisions of its Code of Conduct by posting such information on the Company’s Internet Web site. The Company’s Internet Web site also contains its corporate governance guidelines and the charters of its principal board committees.
Additional information regarding the Company’s directors, information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act and corporate governance set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information regarding executive compensation set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and equity compensation plan information set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information regarding certain relationships and related transactions and director independence set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information regarding principal accountant fees and services set forth in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.
 21 

Table of Contents
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 	 	 	
(a) (1)	 	Financial Statements:	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Financial Statements and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm included in Exhibit 99.1 hereto, incorporated herein by reference:	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2007 and 2006	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005	
 	 	 	
 	 	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005	
 	 	 	
 	 	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	
 	 	 	
 	 	Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	
 	 	 	
(a) (2)	 	Except for the Financial Statement Schedule in Exhibit 99.2, Financial Statement Schedules have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required.	
 	 	 	
(a) (3)	 	Exhibits	
 	 	 	
3.1	 	Restated Certificate of Incorporation (filed as Exhibit 3(iii) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed for the quarter ended December 31, 1999, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
3.2	 	Bylaws (amended and restated) of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
4.1	 	Indenture dated as of December 3, 2004, by and between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company N.A., as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
4.2	 	Exchange and Registration Agreement dated December 3, 2004, relating to the Company’s Floating Rate Notes due 2007, 4.20% Senior Notes due 2010 and 5.00% Notes due 2015 (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 3, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
4.3	 	Cross-reference table for Indenture dated as of December 3, 2004, (listed as Exhibit 4.1 above) and the Trust Indenture Act of 1939, as amended (filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-123115), as declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 29, 2005).	
 	 	 	
10.1*	 	Long-Term Compensation Program dated October 21, 1987, amended November 17, 1993, which was adopted by the stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on November 17, 1993, (filed as Exhibit 10.1(i) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 3, 2002, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.2*	 	Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Restated dated July 17, 1991, and amended May 18, 1994, January 1, 1996, January 19, 2000 and July 20, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10(vi) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.3(i)*	 	1993 Directors’ Stock Option Plan dated November 17, 1993, which was adopted by the stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on November 17, 1993, and amended and restated on September 15, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10-2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.3(ii)*	 	Form of Option Award under the 1993 Directors’ Stock Option Plan as amended and restated as of September 15, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10-3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.4*	 	Form of Officer Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10(viii) to the Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.5*	 	Form of Officer Change in Control Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10(ix) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.6*	 	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan adopted as of January 1, 1996, and amended and restated as of July 20, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10(x) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 22 

Table of Contents

 	 	 	
10.7*	 	The Clorox Company 1995 Performance Unit Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(xi) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.8*	 	The Clorox Company 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, which was adopted by the stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on November 28, 2001, amended and restated as of September 15, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10-4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.9(i)*	 	The Clorox Company Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, adopted in 1996, readopted in 2001, and amended and restated as of July 20, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10(xiii) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.9(ii)*	 	Form of Option Award under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan as amended and restated September 15, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10-5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.9(iii) *	 	Form of Performance Unit Award under the Company’s 1996 Stock Incentive Plan as amended and restated September 15, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10-6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.9(iv)*	 	Form of Award under the Company’s Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10-7 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.10*	 	The Clorox Company Independent Directors’ Stock-Based Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10(xiv) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2002, which was adopted by the stockholders at the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders on November 19, 2003, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.11*	 	The Clorox Company Annual Incentive Plan (formerly named The Clorox Company Management Incentive Compensation Plan), amended and restated as of July 20, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10(xvi) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.12*	 	The Clorox Company 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 21, 2005, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.13*	 	The Clorox Company Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 21, 2005, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.14*	 	The Clorox Company Independent Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.15	 	Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 22, 2005 to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 7, 2004 among The Clorox Company, Citicorp USA, Inc and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agents, and the other Agents and Banks parties therein (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.16*	 	The Clorox Company 2005 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.17*	 	The Amended and Restated Clorox Company Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.18*	 	Form of Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.19*	 	Form of Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 23 

Table of Contents

 	 	 	
10.20*	 	Form of Performance Share Award Agreement under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.21*	 	Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.22*	 	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.7 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.23*	 	Schedule of Interim Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer Compensation (filed as Exhibit 10.8 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.24*	 	The Clorox Company Interim Executive Officer Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed May 4, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.25*	 	Form of Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed May 22, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.26*	 	Agreement between The Clorox Company and G. Craig Sullivan, effective as of November 1, 2001 (filed as Exhibit 10(xvii) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2001, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.27*	 	The Clorox Company 1996 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement entered into by The Clorox Company and Gerald E. Johnston, effective as of July 15, 2003, (filed as Exhibit 10(xxi) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2003, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.28*	 	The Severance Pay Plan for Level 2 and Level 3 Executives effective as of July 1, 2004, (filed as Exhibit 10(xx) to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.29	 	Share Exchange Agreement dated as of October 6, 2004, by and among the Company, Henkel KGaA and HC Investments, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.30	 	Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between The Clorox Company, as Issuer, and Banc of America Securities LLC, as Dealer (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 16, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.31	 	Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between The Clorox Company, as Issuer, and Citicorp Global Markets Inc., as Dealer (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 16, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.32	 	Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between The Clorox Company, as Issuer, and Goldman, Sachs & Co., as Dealer (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 16, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.33	 	Commercial Paper Dealer Agreement between The Clorox Company, as Issuer, and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as Dealer (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 16, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.34	 	Issuing and Paying Agency Agreement by and between The Clorox Company and J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (filed as Exhibit 10.5 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 16, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.35	 	Credit Agreement dated as of November 15, 2004, among The Clorox Company, the Banks listed therein, Citicorp North America, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agents, Citicorp North America, Inc., as Servicing Agent, and Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., as Syndication Agent (filed as Exhibit 10-1 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed November 19, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.36	 	Purchase Agreement dated November 30, 2004, relating to the Floating Rate Senior Notes due December 2007, 4.20% Senior Notes due January 2010 and 5.00% Senior Notes due January 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed December 3, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.37	 	$1,300,000,000 Credit Agreement dated as of December 7, 2004, among The Clorox Company, the Banks listed therein, Citicorp USA, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. as Administrative Agents, Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Bank of America, N.A. as Syndication Agents, and BNP Paribas, ING Capital LLC, Calyon New York Branch and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd. Seattle Branch as Documentation Agents (filed as Exhibit 10-1 to the Report on Form 8-K, filed December 9, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.38(+)	 	Amended and Restated Joint Venture Agreement dated as of January 31, 2003, between The Glad Products Company and certain affiliates and The Procter and Gamble Company and certain affiliates (filed as Exhibit 10 to the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2004, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.39*	 	Form of Employment Offer Letter for Executive Committee Members (filed as Exhibit 10.25 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005, incorporated herein by reference).	
 24 

Table of Contents

 	 	 	
10.40*	 	Schedule of Non-Management Director Compensation (filed as Exhibit 10.26 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2005, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.41*	 	Schedule of Non-Management Director Compensation (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 25, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.42*	 	Schedule of Named Executive Officer Compensation (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 25, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.43*	 	Summary of Benefits (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 24, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.44*	 	Amendment Number One to The Clorox Company 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.45*	 	Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Award Agreement under the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.46*	 	Employment Agreement between The Clorox Company and Donald R. Knauss, dated August 25, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.47*	 	Change in Control Agreement between The Clorox Company and Donald R. Knauss, dated August 25, 2006 (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
10.48*	 	The Clorox Company Replacement Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for the Benefit of Donald R. Knauss (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006, incorporated herein by reference).	
 	 	 	
21.1	 	Subsidiaries.	
 	 	 	
23.1	 	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.	
 	 	 	
31.1	 	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
31.2	 	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
32.1	 	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
99.1	 	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Consolidated Financial Statements, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.	
 	 	 	
99.2	 	Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves.	
 	 	 	
99.3	 	Return on Invested Capital.	

(+)	 	Confidential treatment has been granted for certain information contained in this document. Such information has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.	
 		
(*)	 	Indicates a management or director contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an exhibit to this report.	
 25 

Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 	 	 	 	 	
 	THE CLOROX COMPANY
 	 	
Date: August 24, 2007 	By:  	/s/ D. R. Knauss  	 	
 	 	D. R. Knauss 	 	
 	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 	 	
 	
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 	 	 	 	 	
Signature	 	Title	 	Date	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ D. Boggan, Jr.	 	 	 	 	
 
D. Boggan, Jr.	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ R. Carmona	 	 	 	 	
 
R. Carmona	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ T. M. Friedman	 	 	 	 	
 
T. M. Friedman	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ G. J. Harad	 	 	 	 	
 
G. J. Harad	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ D. R. Knauss	 	 	 	 	
 
D. R. Knauss	 	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ R. W. Matschullat	 	 	 	 	
 
R. W. Matschullat	 	Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ G. G. Michael	 	 	 	 	
 
G. G. Michael	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ E. A. Mueller	 	 	 	 	
 
E. A. Mueller	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ J. L. Murley	 	 	 	 	
 
J. L. Murley	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ M. E. Shannon	 	 	 	 	
 
M. E. Shannon	 	 Director	 	August 24 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ P. Thomas-Graham	 	 	 	 	
 
P. Thomas-Graham	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ C. M. Ticknor	 	 	 	 	
 
C. M. Ticknor	 	 Director	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ D. J. Heinrich	 	 	 	 	
 
D. J. Heinrich	 	Senior Vice President — Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)	 	August 24, 2007	
 	 	 	 	 	
/s/ T. D. Johnson	 	 	 	 	
 
T. D. Johnson	 	Vice President — Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)	 	August 24, 2007	
 26 

Table of Contents
INDEX OF EXHIBITS
 	 	 	
21.1	 	Subsidiaries.	
 	 	 	
23.1	 	Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.	
 	 	 	
31.1	 	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
31.2	 	Certification of the Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
32.1	 	Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Clorox Company pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.	
 	 	 	
99.1	 	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Consolidated Financial Statements, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.	
 	 	 	
99.2	 	Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves.	
 	 	 	
99.3	 	Return on Invested Capital.	

 
Exhibit 21.1
 	 	 	
Name of Company	 	Jurisdiction of Incorporation	
1221 Olux, LLC	 	Delaware	
A & M Products Manufacturing Company	 	Delaware	
Andover Properties, Inc.	 	Delaware	
The Armor All/STP Products Company	 	Delaware	
BGP Switzerland S. a. r. l.	 	Switzerland	
Brita Canada Corporation	 	Nova Scotia	
Brita Canada Holdings Corporation	 	Nova Scotia	
Brita GP	 	Ontario	
Brita LP	 	Ontario	
Brita Manufacturing Company	 	Delaware	
The Brita Products Company	 	Delaware	
Chesapeake Assurance Limited	 	Hawaii	
Clorox Africa (Holdings) Pty. Ltd.	 	South Africa	
Clorox Africa Pty. Ltd.	 	South Africa	
Clorox Argentina S.A.	 	Argentina	
Clorox Australia Pty. Ltd.	 	Australia	
Clorox (Barbados) Inc.	 	Barbados	
Clorox Brazil Holdings LLC	 	Delaware	
Clorox do Brasil Ltda.	 	Brazil	
Clorox Car Care Limited	 	United Kingdom	
Clorox (Cayman Islands) Ltd.	 	Cayman Islands	
Clorox de Centro America, S.A.	 	Costa Rica	
Clorox Chile S.A.	 	Chile	
Clorox China (Guangzhou) Ltd.	 	Guangzhou, P.R.C.	
Clorox de Colombia S.A.	 	Colombia	
Clorox Commercial Company	 	Delaware	
The Clorox Company of Canada Ltd.	 	Canada (Federal)	
Clorox Diamond Production Company	 	Delaware	
Clorox Dominicana, C. por A.	 	Dominican Republic	

 

Name of Company	 	Jurisdiction of Incorporation	
Clorox Eastern Europe LLC	 	Russia	
Clorox Eastern Europe Holdings LLC	 	Delaware	
Clorox (Europe) Financing S.a.r.l.	 	Luxembourg	
The Clorox Far East Company Limited	 	Hong Kong	
Clorox Germany GmbH	 	Germany	
Clorox Holdings Pty. Limited	 	Australia	
Clorox Hong Kong Limited	 	Hong Kong	
Clorox Hungary Liquidity Management Kft	 	Hungary	
The Clorox International Company	 	Delaware	
Clorox International Philippines, Inc.	 	The Philippines	
Clorox Luxembourg S.a.r.l.	 	Luxembourg	
Clorox Manufacturing Company of Puerto Rico, Inc.	 	Puerto Rico	
Clorox (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.	 	Malaysia	
Clorox Mexicana S. de R.L. de C.V.	 	Mexico	
Clorox de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.	 	Mexico	
Clorox Netherlands B.V.	 	The Netherlands	
Clorox New Zealand Limited	 	New Zealand	
Clorox de Panama S.A.	 	Panama	
Clorox Peru S.A.	 	Peru	
The Clorox Outdoor Products Company	 	Delaware	
The Clorox Pet Products Company	 	Texas	
Clorox Professional Products Company	 	Delaware	
The Clorox Sales Company	 	Delaware	
Clorox Services Company	 	Delaware	
Clorox Servicios Corporativos S. de R.L. de C.V.	 	Mexico	
Clorox (Switzerland) S.a.r.l.	 	Switzerland	
Clorox Uruguay S.A.	 	Uruguay	
Corporacion Clorox de Venezuela, S.A.	 	Venezuela	
CLX Realty Co.	 	Delaware	
Electroquimicas Unidas S.A.I.C.	 	Chile	

 

Name of Company	 	Jurisdiction of Incorporation	
Evolution Sociedad S.A.	 	Uruguay	
Fabricante de Productos Plasticos, S.A. de C.V.	 	Mexico	
First Brands (Bermuda) Limited	 	Bermuda	
First Brands do Brasil Ltda.	 	Brazil	
First Brands Corporation	 	Delaware	
First Brands Mexicana, S.A. de C.V.	 	Mexico	
Forest Technology Corporation	 	Delaware	
Fully Will Limited	 	Hong Kong	
Gazoontite, LLC	 	Delaware	
Glad Manufacturing Company	 	Delaware	
The Glad Products Company	 	Delaware	
The Household Cleaning Products Company of Egypt Ltd.	 	Egypt	
The HV Food Products Company	 	Delaware	
HV Manufacturing Company	 	Delaware	
Invermark S.A.	 	Argentina	
Jingles LLC	 	Delaware	
Kaflex S.A.	 	Argentina	
Kingsford Manufacturing Company	 	Delaware	
The Kingsford Products Company, LLC	 	Delaware	
Lerwood Holdings Limited	 	British Virgin Islands	
The Mexco Company	 	Delaware	
National Cleaning Products Company Limited	 	Saudi Arabia	
Pacico International Limited	 	Hong Kong	
Paulsboro Packaging Inc.	 	New Jersey	
Petroplus Produtos Automotivos S.A.	 	Brazil	
Petroplus Sul Comercio Exterior S.A.	 	Brazil	
Polysak, Inc.	 	Connecticut	
Quimica Industrial S. A.	 	Chile	
Round Ridge Production Company	 	Delaware	
STP do Brasil Ltda.	 	Brazil	

 

Name of Company	 	Jurisdiction of Incorporation	
STP Products Manufacturing Company	 	Delaware	
Traisen S.A.	 	Uruguay	
United Cleaning Products Manufacturing Company Limited	 	Yemen	
Yuhan-Clorox Co., Ltd.	 	Korea	

 

Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements:

 	(1)	 	Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-75455 and 333-137974) and in the related Prospectus of The Clorox Company, and	
 		
 	(2)	 	Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-41131, including post effective amendments No. 1 and No. 2, 33-56565, 33-56563, 333-29375, 333-16969, 333-44675, 333-86783, 333-131487, 333-69455, and 333-90386) of The Clorox Company;	
our reports dated August 23, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of The Clorox Company, The Clorox Company management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of The Clorox Company, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2007.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Francisco, California
August 23, 2007

 

Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

 	 	I, Donald R. Knauss, certify that:	

1.	 	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Clorox Company;	

2	 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	

3.	 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	

4.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	

 	a)	 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 		
 	b)	 	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	
 		
 	c)	 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 		
 	d)	 	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	

5.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):	

 	a)	 	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and	
 		
 	b)	 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	
Date: August 24, 2007
/s/ Donald R. Knauss                              
Donald R. Knauss
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION

 	 	I, Daniel J. Heinrich, certify that:	

1.	 	I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Clorox Company;	

2.	 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;	

3.	 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;	

4.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:	

 	a)	 	designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;	
 		
 	b)	 	designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;	
 		
 	c)	 	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and	
 		
 	d)	 	disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	

5.	 	The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):	

 	a)	 	all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and	
 		
 	b)	 	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.	
Date: August 24, 2007
/s/ Daniel J. Heinrich                              
Daniel J. Heinrich
Senior Vice President — Chief Financial Officer

 

Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
In connection with the annual report of The Clorox Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), we, Donald R. Knauss, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Daniel J. Heinrich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of our knowledge:

 	(1)	 	the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and	
 		
 	(2)	 	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.	
This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Date: August 24, 2007
/s/ Donald R. Knauss                                        
Donald R. Knauss
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Daniel J. Heinrich                                        
Daniel J. Heinrich
Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer

 

Exhibit 99.1
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Consolidated Financial Statements, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The Clorox Company
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)
 
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is designed to provide a reader of the Company’s financial statements with a narrative from the perspective of management on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and certain other factors that may affect future results. The MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This MD&A includes the following sections:

• 	Executive Overview	
 		
• 	Results of Worldwide Operations	
 		
• 	Financial Position and Liquidity	
 		
• 	Contingencies	
 		
• 	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	
 		
• 	New Accounting Pronouncements	
 		
• 	Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	
 
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
 
The Clorox Company (the Company or Clorox) is a leading manufacturer and marketer of consumer products with fiscal year 2007 revenues of $4,847. The Company is principally engaged in the production, marketing and sales of consumer products through mass merchandisers, grocery stores and other retail outlets. Clorox markets some of consumers’ most trusted and recognized brand names, including its namesake bleach and cleaning products, Armor All ® and STP ® auto-care products, Fresh Step ® and Scoop Away ® cat litters, Kingsford ® charcoal briquets, Hidden Valley ® and KC Masterpiece ® dressings and sauces, Brita ® water-filtration systems, and Glad ® bags, wraps and containers. In addition, the Company has a number of leading brands in international markets, including those sold under the Poett ® , Mistolin ® and Ayudín ® brand names. With approximately 7,800 employees worldwide, the Company manufactures products in more than 20 countries and markets them in more than 100 countries.
 
As of June 30, 2007, the Company operated through three reportable segments: the Household Group — North America, Specialty Group and International. The Household Group — North America segment includes U.S. laundry, cleaning, water-filtration, auto-care and professional products and all products marketed in Canada. The Specialty Group segment includes the plastic bags, wraps and containers business, charcoal, cat litter and food products marketed in the United States. The International segment includes operations outside the United States and Canada.
 
Strategic Initiatives
 
In May 2007, Clorox announced its Centennial Strategy. A key driver of the strategy is to accelerate sales by growing existing brands, expanding into adjacent product categories, entering new sales channels, increasing penetration within existing countries and pursuing new businesses in growing markets where the Company can sustain a competitive advantage. The strategy includes annual financial targets of 3-5% sales growth, and growth in the earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) margin by 50-75 basis points. By achieving these financial goals, the

1

 

Company believes it can realize double-digit economic profit growth and average free cash flow of 10% of sales, or more. To achieve these financial objectives, the Company plans to leverage its previous strategy and its capabilities in the areas of the consumer, the customer and cost management to drive demand creation and to strengthen consumer lifetime loyalty through what the Company calls its 3D’s: Desire, Decide, and Delight.
 
Desire is about integrated pre-purchase communications that increase consumers’ awareness about how the Company’s brands meet their needs;
 
Decide is about winning at the store shelf, through superior packaging and execution of product assortment, merchandising, pricing and shelving; and
 
Delight is about continuing to offer high-quality, consumer-preferred products that exceed their expectations, so the consumers will keep coming back to the Company’s brands.
 
Further, the Company will continue to relentlessly drive out waste through its initiatives to cut costs and enhance margins. The savings generated through these initiatives, along with the Company’s strong free cash flow and ability to raise capital, will enable the Company to drive higher profitable growth and shareholder returns.
 
Fiscal Year 2007 Summary
 
Financial Highlights
 
The Company reported net earnings of $501 and diluted net earnings per common share of $3.26, or a 12% increase, for the year ended June 30, 2007. This compares to net earnings of $444 and diluted net earnings per common share of $2.90 for the year ended June 30, 2006, which included charges associated with historical stock option expense (described more fully in “Results of Worldwide Operations” below). Results for the year ended June 30, 2007, were driven by volume and net sales growth across all of the Company’s operating segments, especially in its International and Specialty Group segments. However, the Company continues to face a challenging competitive environment and cost and inflationary pressures. The Company is addressing these challenges through its Centennial Strategy which includes on-going cost savings programs, innovative product improvements and new products, and advertising and trade-promotional spending to support its brands.
 
Certain key fiscal year 2007 developments are summarized as follows:

• 	The Company’s segments reported an overall 4% increase in net sales for the year ended June 30, 2007, primarily driven by price increases implemented in the prior fiscal year and volume growth (see “Results of Worldwide Operations” below for more information).	
 		
• 	In May 2007, the Company introduced its plan to drive long-term growth through its Centennial Strategy, which is described above.	
 		
• 	Beginning in its fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company announced that its quarterly cash dividend will be increased by 29% to 40 cents per share from 31 cents per share.	
 		
• 	In January 2007, the Company named Larry Peiros as executive vice president and chief operating officer — North America, Beth Springer as executive vice president — strategy and growth, and Frank Tataseo as executive vice president — functional operations.	
 		
• 	In December 2006, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase bleach businesses in Canada and certain countries in Latin America. The Company acquired the bleach business in Canada on December 29, 2006, and the bleach businesses in Ecuador, Dominican Republic, Venezuela and Uruguay on February 28, 2007.	
 		
• 	In October 2006, as part of its continuing efforts to cut costs and enhance margins, the Company entered into an Information Technology Services (ITS) Agreement with Hewlett-Packard (HP), a third-party service provider, effective in March 2007. In conjunction with implementing the ITS Agreement, the Company restructured certain Information Services (IS) activities.	
 		
• 	Donald R. Knauss was named chairman and chief executive officer (CEO), effective October 2006. He succeeded Robert W. Matschullat, who served as the Company’s interim chairman and interim CEO.	

2

 

RESULTS OF WORLDWIDE OPERATIONS
 
Management’s discussion and analysis of the results of worldwide operations, unless otherwise noted, compares fiscal year 2007 to fiscal year 2006, and fiscal year 2006 to fiscal year 2005, using percent changes calculated on a rounded basis, except as noted. In certain instances, parenthetical references are made to relevant sections of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to direct the reader to a further detailed discussion. In addition, the discussion of results of worldwide operations includes several measures not defined by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (non-GAAP measures), including return on invested capital and free cash flow as a percentage of net sales. Management believes these measures provide investors with additional information about the underlying results and trends of the Company. Information about these non-GAAP measures is set forth in the paragraphs where they are discussed.
 
Consolidated Results
 
financial performance measures

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	% Change	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to	 	 	to	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Net sales	 	$	4,847	 	 	$	4,644	 	 	$	4,388	 	 	 	4	%	 	 	6	%	
Gross profit margin	 	 	43.1	%	 	 	42.2	%	 	 	43.2	%	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted net earnings per common share from continuing operations	 	$	3.23	 	 	$	2.89	 	 	$	2.88	 	 	 	12	 	 	 	—	 	
Return on invested capital	 	 	14.7	%	 	 	13.3	%	 	 	13.9	%	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Free cash flow as a % of net sales	 	 	11.6	%	 	 	7.4	%	 	 	14.0	%	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

Net sales in fiscal year 2007 increased 4% compared to the prior period. Volume grew 2%, primarily due to increased shipments of home-care products, cat litter and the recently acquired bleach businesses in Canada and Latin America. Contributing to the volume growth in fiscal year 2007 were increased shipments of Fresh Step ® scoopable cat litter with odor eliminating carbon, Clorox ® disinfecting wipes, the launch of Clorox ® disinfecting cleaner and Clorox ® toilet-bowl cleaner, behind a product improvement. These were partially offset by lower shipments of Clorox 2 ® color-safe bleach primarily due to the impact of aggressive competitive activity, and Glad ® products which were impacted by higher pricing, and aggressive competitive activity in the trash bags category. Sales growth outpaced volume growth, primarily due to the impact of price increases, partially offset by increased trade-promotion spending.
 
Net sales in fiscal year 2006 increased 6% compared to the prior period. Volume increased 1% as price increases impacted shipments, as anticipated. Sales growth outpaced volume growth primarily due to price increases and trade spending efficiencies. Contributing to the volume growth in fiscal year 2006 was the introduction of several new products and product improvements, including Clorox ® Anywhere Hard Surface tm daily sanitizing spray, Liquid-Plumr ® Power Jet tm instant clog remover, Kingsford ® charcoal with Sure Fire Grooves tm and Fresh Step ® cat litter with odor-eliminating carbon. Also driving overall volume growth were strong shipments of home-care products within Latin America.
 
Gross profit increased 7% in fiscal year 2007, and increased as a percentage of net sales to 43.1% in fiscal year 2007 from 42.2% in fiscal year 2006. The increase was primarily due to the benefit of cost savings and price increases. These factors were partially offset by increased commodity costs, higher manufacturing and logistics costs and increased trade-promotion spending.
 
Gross profit increased 3% in fiscal year 2006, and decreased as a percentage of net sales to 42.2% in fiscal year 2006 from 43.2% in fiscal year 2005. This decline as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to significantly higher energy-related commodity, manufacturing and transportation costs, partially offset by pricing actions and cost savings.
 
Diluted net earnings per common share from continuing operations increased by $0.34 or 12% in fiscal year 2007. The increase was due to higher earnings from continuing operations driven by higher sales and cost savings.

3

 

Also contributing to the increase were after-tax charges in the prior year of $16, or 11 cents diluted EPS, associated with non-cash historical stock option compensation expense and $7, or 5 cents diluted EPS, related to the retirement of the former chairman and CEO from his positions.
 
Diluted net earnings per common share from continuing operations increased by $0.01 in fiscal year 2006. This reflected a decrease in common shares outstanding during fiscal year 2006 due to the share exchange of 61.4 million shares previously held by Henkel KGaA (Henkel) in November 2004 (refer to the “Earnings from Discontinued Operations” section for further discussion). Results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year included a cumulative after-tax charge of $16 resulting from non-cash charges associated with historical stock option compensation expense relating to prior periods dating back to the third quarter of fiscal 1996. The after-tax charge reduced reported fourth-quarter and full-year diluted EPS by 11 cents. Lower earnings from continuing operations was primarily due to significantly higher commodity costs, the correction for historical stock option accounting, costs associated with the retirement of the former chairman and CEO from his positions and incremental costs related to accounting for equity compensation under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123-R, Share-Based Payment , substantially offset by pricing actions and cost savings.
 
Return on invested capital (ROIC) is a non-GAAP measure used by management to evaluate the efficiency of its capital spending as a performance metric for its long-term incentive programs (for a detailed reconciliation of ROIC, refer to Exhibit 99.3). ROIC is defined by the Company as adjusted operating profit after taxes, excluding certain costs and expenses, divided by average invested capital. Average invested capital includes total assets less current liabilities (excluding short-term debt) before cumulative historical goodwill amortization, asset impairment and restructuring charges. ROIC increased by approximately 140 basis points during fiscal year 2007 due to higher adjusted operating profit and relatively flat average invested capital. The higher adjusted operating profit was primarily due to higher earnings from continuing operations driven by higher sales and cost savings, and $36 of prior year pretax incremental costs related to historical stock option compensation expense and the retirement of the former chairman and CEO from his positions. ROIC decreased approximately 60 basis points to 13.3% during fiscal year 2006 due to lower adjusted operating profit and higher invested capital. Adjusted operating profit in fiscal year 2006 includes $36 of pretax incremental costs described above, which lowered ROIC by 60 basis points. Invested capital increased slightly due to an increase in other assets as a result of the Company recording a net pension asset at June 30, 2006, compared to a net pension liability at June 30, 2005, for its domestic plan.
 
Free cash flow is a non-GAAP measure used by the Company’s management to help assess funds available for investing activities such as acquisitions and financing activities including debt payments, dividend payments and share repurchases. Free cash flow is calculated as cash provided by operations less capital expenditures. Free cash flow does not represent cash available only for discretionary expenditures, since the Company has mandatory debt service requirements and other contractual and non-discretionary expenditures.

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Cash provided by operations	 	$	709	 	 	$	522	 	 	$	765	 	
Less: capital expenditures	 	 	(147	)	 	 	(180	)	 	 	(151	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Free cash flow	 	$	562	 	 	$	342	 	 	$	614	 	

 
Free cash flow as a percentage of net sales increased to 11.6% in fiscal year 2007 from 7.4% in fiscal year 2006, primarily due to a $151 income tax settlement payment in fiscal year 2006, an increase in earnings from continuing operations and lower capital expenditures. Free cash flow, as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 7.4% in fiscal year 2006 from 14.0% in fiscal year 2005, primarily due to a decline in earnings from continuing operations, an incremental $57 tax payment pertaining to the fiscal year 2005 tax settlement and higher capital expenditures.

4

 

expenses

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	% Change	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to	 	 	to	 	 	% of Net Sales	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Selling and administrative expenses	 	$	642	 	 	$	631	 	 	$	551	 	 	 	2	%	 	 	15	%	 	 	13.2	%	 	 	13.6	%	 	 	12.6	%	
Advertising costs	 	 	474	 	 	 	450	 	 	 	435	 	 	 	5	 	 	 	3	 	 	 	9.8	 	 	 	9.7	 	 	 	9.9	 	
Research and development costs	 	 	108	 	 	 	99	 	 	 	88	 	 	 	9	 	 	 	13	 	 	 	2.2	 	 	 	2.1	 	 	 	2.0	 	

Selling and administrative expenses increased 2% in fiscal year 2007 primarily due to transition fees related to the Company’s ITS Agreement (see “Restructuring and asset impairment costs” section below), higher sales commissions and the second year impact of adopting SFAS No. 123-R, and incremental costs to support the Company’s new strategy. These increases were partially offset by the fiscal year 2006 pretax charges of $25 associated with non-cash historical stock option compensation expense and $11 related to the retirement of the former chairman and CEO from his positions.
 
Selling and administrative expenses increased 15% in fiscal year 2006 partially due to a pretax cumulative charge of $25 resulting from non-cash charges associated with historical stock option compensation expense relating to prior periods dating back to the third quarter of fiscal 1996. Also contributing to the increase was additional pretax share-based compensation costs of $24 upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, and a charge of $11 due to the retirement of the former chairman and CEO from his positions.
 
Advertising costs increased 5% in fiscal year 2007 as a result of higher spending behind continued advertising for Fresh Step ® scoopable cat litter with odor eliminating carbon which was launched in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006, new product launches primarily in the home-care division, other marketing investment for established brands and growth initiatives in Canada and Latin America.
 
Advertising costs increased 3% in fiscal year 2006 as a result of higher spending for new product launches and increased marketing investment in established brands.
 
Research and development costs increased 9% in fiscal year 2007 as a result of increased headcount and investment in innovation.
 
Research and development costs increased 13% in fiscal year 2006 as a result of increased investment in innovation and higher compensation expense.
 
The following table summarizes restructuring and asset impairment costs, interest expense, other (income), net and income taxes on continuing operations:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Restructuring and asset impairment costs	 	$	13	 	 	$	1	 	 	$	36	 	
Interest expense	 	 	113	 	 	 	127	 	 	 	79	 	
Other (income), net	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(23	)	
Income taxes on continuing operations	 	 	247	 	 	 	210	 	 	 	212	 	

Restructuring and asset impairment costs of $13 in fiscal year 2007 included $9 of restructuring costs associated with the ITS agreement as described below, which are included as part of the Company’s Corporate segment and $4 of asset impairment costs, which are included as part of the Specialty Group segment.
 
During fiscal year 2007, the Company entered into an ITS agreement and restructured certain IS activities. The Company incurred administrative expenses and restructuring costs of approximately $23 during its fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, primarily associated with transition and severance costs. In fiscal year 2007, transition costs of $14 were recorded in administrative expense and severance and other related costs of $9 were recorded as restructuring costs which are included as part of the Company’s Corporate segment. Total restructuring payments through June 30, 2007, were $9 and the total accrued restructuring liability as of June 30, 2007, was zero.
 
Restructuring and asset impairment costs of $36 in fiscal year 2005 included $26 for asset impairment and $6 for severance and other costs related to the second phase of the Glad ® supply chain restructuring. This phase included

5

 

closing a manufacturing facility and assigning remaining production to certain of the Company’s North America plants and third-party suppliers. The Company also recorded asset impairment charges and severance costs of $4 related to manufacturing operations in the International segment.
 
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2008, the Board of Directors approved initiatives to simplify the Company’s supply chain (Supply Chain restructuring) and terminate certain new venture investments in line with the Company’s Centennial Strategy. This Supply Chain restructuring involves closing certain domestic and international manufacturing facilities and redistributing production between the remaining facilities and third-party producers to optimize available capacity and reduce operating costs. As a result of this initiative, a number of positions will be eliminated. The Company anticipates this restructuring to be completed by fiscal year 2010. The total cost of implementing this Supply Chain restructuring is estimated to be between $32 and $39, of which $28 to $34 is expected to be incurred in fiscal year 2008. The projected annual savings at the completion of this restructuring is expected to be approximately $23 to $24. No significant charges were incurred during fiscal year 2007 (Note 3).
 
In addition, the Company expects to incur charges related to the write-down of certain new venture investments. The Company anticipates the initiative to be completed in fiscal year 2008 with total costs to be in the range of $21 to $24. During fiscal year 2008, the Company anticipates asset impairment costs of $18 to $21 in the Specialty Group segment. The remaining estimated asset impairment costs will be spread across the Household Group — North America and Corporate segments. No charges were incurred during fiscal year 2007.
 
Interest expense decreased $14 in fiscal year 2007, driven primarily by lower debt levels as a result of a decrease in average commercial paper borrowings and a $150 debt repayment in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007. These were partially offset by higher interest rates.
 
Interest expense increased $48 in fiscal year 2006, driven primarily by a full year of interest costs associated with the $1,650 in senior notes related to the Henkel share exchange and higher interest rates.
 
Other income (expense), net of $2 in fiscal year 2007 included interest income of $8 and equity earnings of $8. Partially offsetting this income were amortization of intangible assets of $5, foreign exchange losses of $4 and operating expenses from the Company’s investment in low-income housing partnerships of $4.
 
Other income, net of $2 in fiscal year 2006 included interest income of $10 and equity earnings of $7. Partially offsetting this income were operating expenses of $15 from the Company’s investment in low-income housing partnerships.
 
Other income, net of $23 in fiscal year 2005 included $25 related to the gain on the exchange and equity earnings from the Company’s investment in Henkel Iberica, S.A. (Henkel Iberica), which was transferred to Henkel as part of the share exchange (refer to the “Earnings from Discontinued Operations” section below for further discussion). In addition, the Company recorded an $11 foreign currency transaction gain in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005 (Note 18). Partially offsetting these gains were operating expenses of $16 from the Company’s investment in low-income housing partnerships (Note 18).
 
The effective tax rate on continuing operations was 33.2%, 32.1% and 29.1% in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The fiscal year 2007 tax rate was higher than in fiscal year 2006 primarily due to tax benefits recognized on foreign earnings repatriated in fiscal year 2006, offset partially by lower net tax-contingency accruals in fiscal year 2007, primarily as a result of the settlement of federal tax issues for the fiscal years 1997 to 2000.
 
The fiscal year 2006 tax rate was higher than the fiscal year 2005 tax rate primarily due to the fiscal year 2005 release of tax accruals related to a tax settlement with the IRS and the nontaxable gain on the fiscal year 2005 exchange in the equity investment in Henkel Iberica. These two items were partially offset by fiscal year 2006 releases of tax accruals for state and federal taxes as well as higher fiscal year 2005 tax accruals on earnings repatriated in fiscal year 2006 under the American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA).
 
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109. For additional information, refer to the information set forth under the caption “New Accounting Pronouncements” below.

6

 

earnings from discontinued operations

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Gain on exchange	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	550	 	
Earnings from exchanged businesses	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	37	 	
Reversal of deferred taxes from exchanged businesses	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	6	 	
Income tax benefit (expense) on discontinued operations	 	 	5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(14	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total earnings from discontinued operations	 	$	5	 	 	$	1	 	 	$	579	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations	 	$	0.03	 	 	$	0.01	 	 	$	3.23	 	

On November 22, 2004, the Company completed the exchange of its ownership interest in a subsidiary for Henkel’s interest in Clorox common stock. Prior to the completion of the exchange, Henkel owned approximately 61.4 million shares, or about 29%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The parties agreed that the Company would provide exchange value equal to $46.25 per share of Company stock being acquired in the exchange. The subsidiary transferred to Henkel contained Clorox’s existing insecticides and Soft Scrub ® cleanser businesses, its 20% interest in the Henkel Iberica joint venture, and $2,095 in cash. The fair value of the businesses was determined through arm’s-length negotiations supported by traditional valuation methodologies that included discounted cash flow calculations and sales and earnings multiples.
 
The gain on exchange, earnings from exchanged businesses and reversal of deferred taxes were related to the Company’s transaction with Henkel.
 
Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations in fiscal year 2007 was due to an income tax benefit of $5 related to the sale of certain assets remaining from the Company’s discontinued operations in Brazil (Note 2). Diluted earnings per share from discontinued operations decreased in fiscal year 2006 primarily due to the end of interim production of insecticides and Soft Scrub ® following the Henkel share exchange.
 
Segment Results
 
household group — north america

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	% Change	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to	 	 	to	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Net sales	 	$	2,140	 	 	$	2,113	 	 	$	2,013	 	 	 	1	%	 	 	5	%	
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	671	 	 	 	671	 	 	 	629	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	7	 	

Fiscal year 2007 versus fiscal year 2006:   Volume and net sales increased 1% while earnings from continuing operations before income taxes remained flat during fiscal year 2007. The volume growth was driven primarily by the recently acquired bleach business in Canada and increased shipments of home-care products, partially offset by lower shipments of certain laundry-care products. Net sales increased due to volume growth and the impact of price increases, partially offset by higher trade-promotion spending in response to aggressive competitive activity, and product mix. Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes remained flat as higher net sales and the benefits of cost savings were offset by increased commodity costs and logistics costs.
 
Shipments of laundry and home-care products remained flat during fiscal year 2007. Strong shipments of Clorox ® disinfecting wipes, the launch of Clorox ® disinfecting cleaner and increased shipments of Clorox ® toilet-bowl cleaner were offset by lower shipments of Clorox 2 ® color-safe bleach primarily due to the impact of competitive activity.
 
Shipments in Canada increased 11% during fiscal year 2007 primarily as the result of the recently acquired bleach business.
 
Shipments of Brita ® U.S. and automotive-care products decreased 4% and 2%, respectively, primarily due to the impact of increased pricing on consumption, as anticipated.

7

 

Fiscal year 2006 versus fiscal year 2005:   Net sales and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes increased while volume declined 1% during fiscal year 2006. The volume decline was driven primarily by the impact of price increases, as anticipated. The variance between net sales and volume was driven by the impact of higher pricing and trade-promotion spending efficiencies. The increase in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes is primarily due to the benefits of cost savings and higher net sales, partially offset by significantly higher costs for raw materials, manufacturing, and transportation and other energy-related costs.
 
Shipments of laundry and home-care products remained flat during fiscal year 2006, primarily due to strong shipments of home-care products, including Clorox ® disinfecting wipes and Pine-Sol ® cleaner. These increases were offset by lower shipments of laundry-care products due to the impact of price increases on consumption and lower trade-promotion spending.
 
Shipments of Brita ® U.S. products decreased by 7% during fiscal year 2006 primarily due to the impact of increased pricing on consumption.
 
Shipments of automotive-care products decreased 5% during fiscal year 2006 primarily due to the impact of higher pricing on consumption and decreased market demand in Armor All ® gels, partially offset by increased shipments of STP ® products.
 
specialty group

  	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	% Change	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to	 	 	to	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Net sales	 	$	1,990	 	 	$	1,892	 	 	$	1,788	 	 	 	5	%	 	 	6	%	
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	534	 	 	 	460	 	 	 	435	 	 	 	16	 	 	 	6	 	

Fiscal year 2007 versus fiscal year 2006:   Volume, net sales and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes increased during fiscal year 2007. Volume growth of 1% was driven primarily by increased shipments of cat litter due to a product improvement. Net sales growth outpaced volume growth primarily due to the impact of price increases, as anticipated, partially offset by increased trade-promotion spending in response to competitive activity. Growth in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes was primarily driven by increased net sales and the benefits from cost savings, partially offset by higher commodity costs, increased advertising and manufacturing and logistics costs.
 
Shipments of Glad ® products decreased 1% during fiscal year 2007. This decrease was primarily driven by the impact of higher pricing, as anticipated, and aggressive competitive activity in the trash bags category, partially offset by GladWare ® Containers with Interlocking lids which was launched in the third quarter of fiscal year 2006.
 
Shipments of food products remained flat during fiscal year 2007. Lower shipments of KC Masterpiece ® sauces, primarily driven by competitive activity, were offset by increased shipments of Hidden Valley ® salad dressing.
 
Shipments of cat litter increased 8% during fiscal year 2007. This increase was primarily driven by Fresh Step ® scoopable cat litter, behind a significant product improvement and increased advertising.
 
Shipments of Kingsford ® charcoal products decreased 1% during fiscal year 2007. This decrease was primarily driven by the impact of higher pricing, as anticipated.
 
Fiscal year 2006 versus fiscal year 2005:   Net sales and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes increased while volume remained flat during fiscal year 2006. Flat volume growth was driven primarily by increased shipments of new Kingsford ® and cat litter product improvements offset by decreased shipments of Glad ® and food products due to price increases, as anticipated. The variance between net sales and volume was primarily due to the impact of price increases, as anticipated, and trade-promotion spending efficiencies in fiscal year 2006. Growth in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes was primarily driven by increased net sales, cost savings and a favorable comparison to the year-ago period when the Company recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges related to the Glad ® product supply chain. These factors were partially offset by significantly higher raw material, manufacturing, transportation and energy-related costs in fiscal year 2006.

8

 

Shipments of Glad ® products decreased 3% during fiscal year 2006. This decrease was primarily driven by the impact of higher pricing, as anticipated, and lower shipments of Glad ® Press n’ Seal ® wrap as a result of softer consumption trends, partially offset by a slight increase in Glad ® trash bag shipments.
 
Shipments of food products decreased 1% during fiscal year 2006. This decrease was primarily driven by lower shipments of KC Masterpiece ® sauces driven by competitive activity, partially offset by increased shipments of Hidden Valley ® salad dressing.
 
Shipments of cat litter increased 5% during fiscal year 2006. This gain was primarily driven by significantly increased shipments of Scoop Away ® and Fresh Step ® cat litter driven by category and distribution growth, increased advertising and the launch of scoopable litter with odor-eliminating carbon in fiscal year 2006.
 
Shipments of Kingsford ® charcoal products increased 1% during fiscal year 2006, driven primarily by the launch of charcoal briquets with Sure Fire Grooves tm and increased advertising, partially offset by the impact of higher pricing, as anticipated.
 
international

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	% Change	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to	 	 	to	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Net sales	 	$	717	 	 	$	639	 	 	$	587	 	 	 	12	%	 	 	9	%	
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	141	 	 	 	129	 	 	 	123	 	 	 	9	 	 	 	5	 	

Fiscal year 2007 versus fiscal year 2006:   Volume, net sales and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes increased during fiscal year 2007. Volume growth of 9% was driven by increased shipments of home-care products in Latin America, primarily due to market and category growth and the recently acquired bleach businesses in certain Latin American countries. The variance between net sales and volume growth was primarily driven by pricing and favorable foreign exchange rates. Growth in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes reflects the benefit of higher net sales and costs savings, partially offset by the impact of increased selling and administrative costs and higher raw material costs.
 
Fiscal year 2006 versus fiscal year 2005:   Volume, net sales and earnings from continuing operations before income taxes increased during fiscal year 2006. Volume growth of 6% was driven by increased shipments of home-care products in Latin America due to market and category growth, partially offset by lower volume in Australia, in part, resulting from the discontinuation of a low-margin product line in early fiscal year 2006. The variance between net sales and volume growth was primarily due to the impact of price increases, as anticipated. Growth in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes reflects the benefit of higher net sales and costs savings partially offset by the impact of significantly higher raw material and transportation costs.
 
corporate, interest and other

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	% Change	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	to	 	 	to	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Losses from continuing operations before income taxes	 	$	(603	)	 	$	(607	)	 	$	(458	)	 	 	(1	)%	 	 	33	%	

Fiscal year 2007 versus fiscal year 2006:   The losses from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to Corporate, Interest and Other decreased by $4, or 1%, in fiscal year 2007, primarily due to pretax charges in the prior year of $25 associated with non-cash historical stock option compensation expense and $11 related to the retirement of the former chairman and CEO from his positions. Also contributing to the decrease were lower interest costs, due to a $150 debt repayment in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007 and lower commercial paper borrowings due to strong operating cash flows, and operating expenses from low-income housing investments. These decreases were partially offset by costs related to the Company’s ITS Agreement, incremental costs to support the Company’s new strategy, increased foreign exchange losses and other smaller items.

9

 

Fiscal year 2006 versus fiscal year 2005:   The losses from continuing operations before income taxes attributable to Corporate, Interest and Other increased by $149, or 33%, in fiscal year 2006, primarily due to increased interest costs associated with the offering of $1,650 in senior notes and higher interest rates, additional share-based compensation costs recognized upon the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, a pretax cumulative charge of $25 resulting from non-cash charges associated with historical stock option compensation expense relating to prior periods dating back to the third quarter of fiscal 1996, an $11 charge due to the retirement of former chairman and CEO from his positions and an unfavorable comparison in the year-ago period when the Company recognized a nonrecurring gain on the exchange of equity in Henkel Iberica.
 
FINANCIAL POSITION AND LIQUIDITY
 
Management’s discussion and analysis of the financial position and liquidity describes the Company’s consolidated operating, investing and financing activities, contractual obligations and off balance sheet arrangements. In certain instances, parenthetical references are made to relevant sections of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to direct the reader to a further detailed discussion.
 
The Company’s financial position and liquidity remained strong during fiscal year 2007, due to the continued strength of operating cash flows. During fiscal year 2007, the Company remained disciplined in its capital spending and used strong cash flows to purchase bleach businesses in Canada and certain Latin American countries, pay down debt, increase dividends and continue share repurchases to offset the impact of share dilution related to share-based awards.
 
The following table summarizes cash activities:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Cash provided by continuing operations	 	$	709	 	 	$	514	 	 	$	728	 	
Cash used for investing by continuing operations	 	 	(268	)	 	 	(161	)	 	 	(154	)	
Cash used for financing by continuing operations	 	 	(456	)	 	 	(462	)	 	 	(552	)	

Operating Activities
 
Net cash provided by continuing operations increased to $709 in fiscal year 2007 from $514 in fiscal year 2006. The year-over-year increase was primarily due to a $151 income tax settlement payment, as described below, in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006.
 
Net cash provided by continuing operations decreased to $514 in fiscal year 2006 from $728 in fiscal year 2005. The year-over-year decrease was primarily due to increased working capital and the settlement of income tax matters as described below.
 
In April 2005, the Company reached a settlement agreement with the IRS which resulted in federal and state tax and interest payments of $151 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2006 and $94 in fiscal year 2005. During fiscal year 2006, the Company also repatriated approximately $265 of cash previously held in foreign entities. Of this amount, $111 represented dividends paid under the terms of the AJCA that the Company used for reinvestment in certain qualified activities.
 
Investing Activities
 
Capital expenditures were $147 in fiscal year 2007, $180 in fiscal year 2006, and $151 in fiscal year 2005. Capital spending as a percentage of net sales was 3.0%, 3.9%, and 3.4% for fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Capital expenditures are in line with the Company’s long-term target of 4% or less of net sales. Lower capital spending during fiscal year 2007 was driven primarily by lower spending on information technology projects compared to fiscal year 2006. Higher capital spending during fiscal year 2006 was driven in part by additional investment related to planned food and charcoal manufacturing capacity expansion.
 
The Company purchased bleach businesses in Canada, effective December 29, 2006, and in certain Latin American countries, effective February 28, 2007, for an aggregate price of $123, with the objective of expanding its global bleach business. The transactions were structured as all cash acquisitions and operating results of the acquired

10

 

businesses are included in the consolidated net earnings of the Household Group — North America and International segments for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, from their respective dates of acquisition. During fiscal year 2007, the acquisition provided $31 in net sales.
 
Financing Activities
 
capital resources and liquidity
 
In March 2007, the Company paid off $150 of debt which became due. The payment was financed through operating cash flows. In December 2007, $500 of debt will become due and payable. The Company anticipates refinancing the debt repayment.
 
The Company continues to maintain strong credit ratings as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, as shown in the table below, and was in compliance with all restrictive covenants and limitations as of June 30, 2007 and 2006.

 	 	Short-Term	 	 	Long-Term	 	
 		
Standard and Poor’s	 	 	A-2	 	 	 	A-	 	
Moody’s	 	 	P-2	 	 	 	A3	 	
Fitch	 	 	F-2	 	 	 	A-	 	

In August 2007, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s revised the Company’s long-term credit rating to BBB+ after the Company announced its intent to repurchase shares in an aggregate amount of up to $750 based on the Company’s existing authorization (see “Share Repurchases and Dividend Payments” section below). The short-term credit rating remained unchanged. In addition, Moody’s indicated that it has put Clorox’s ratings under review for possible downgrade but also indicated it is unlikely that their ratings would be lowered by more than one notch as a result of this review.
 
The Company’s credit facilities as of June 30 were as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Revolving credit line	 	$	1,300	 	 	$	1,300	 	
Foreign and other credit lines	 	 	95	 	 	 	49	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	1,395	 	 	$	1,349	 	

 
As of June 30, 2007, there were no borrowings under the $1,300 revolving credit agreement, which is available for general corporate purposes and to support additional commercial paper issuances. Of the $1,300 revolving credit agreement, $165 expires in December 2009, and the remainder expires in December 2010. In addition, at June 30, 2007, the Company had $95 foreign working capital credit lines and other facilities, of which $79 was available for borrowing.
 
Based on the Company’s working capital requirements, the current borrowing availability under its credit agreements, its strong credit ratings, and its expected ability to generate positive cash flows from operations in the future, the Company believes it will have the funds necessary to meet all of its financing requirements and other fixed obligations as they become due. Should the Company undertake transactions requiring funds in excess of its current cash levels and available credit lines, it might consider the issuance of debt or other securities to finance acquisitions, to repurchase shares, to refinance debt or to fund other activities for general business purposes.
 
share repurchases and dividend payments
 
The Company has two share repurchase programs: an open-market program, which had, as of June 30, 2007, a total authorization of $750, and a program to offset the impact of share dilution related to share-based awards (evergreen program), which has no authorization limit.
 
The open-market program was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2007, and it replaced the July 2002 and July 2003 share repurchase open-market programs.

11

 

No shares were repurchased under the open-market programs in fiscal years 2007 and 2006. Share repurchases under the evergreen program were $155 (2.4 million shares) in fiscal year 2007 and $135 (2.4 million shares) in fiscal year 2006.
 
On August 10, 2007, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) program with two investment banks. Under the ASR program, the Company repurchased $750 of its shares of common stock from the investment banks for an initial per share amount of $59.59, subject to adjustment. The Company financed the purchase of its shares with cash and commercial paper. Final settlement of the ASR program is scheduled to take place by January 2008. The final number of shares the Company is repurchasing under the terms of the agreement and the timing of the final settlement will depend on prevailing market conditions, the final discounted volume weighted average share price over the term of the ASR program and any other customary adjustments. As part of the final settlement, the Company may receive additional shares from the investment banks or may be required to pay to the investment banks a price adjustment. The price adjustment may be made in common stock or cash, at the Company’s election. As this ASR occurred subsequent to June 30, 2007, it is not reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
On May 24, 2007, the Company announced an increase in the quarterly dividend rate from $0.31 per share to $0.40 per share. Dividends paid in fiscal year 2007 were $183 or $1.20 per share.
 
contractual obligations
 
The Company had contractual obligations payable or maturing (excluding commercial paper borrowings, planned funding of pensions and other post-retirement benefits) in the following fiscal years:

At June 30, 2007	 	2008	 	 	2009	 	 	2010	 	 	2011	 	 	2012	 	 	Thereafter	 	 	Total	 	
 		
Operating leases	 	$	26	 	 	$	23	 	 	$	21	 	 	$	16	 	 	$	14	 	 	$	41	 	 	$	141	 	
ITS Agreement (service agreement only)(1)	 	 	38	 	 	 	38	 	 	 	35	 	 	 	35	 	 	 	35	 	 	 	43	 	 	 	224	 	
Purchase obligations	 	 	215	 	 	 	59	 	 	 	20	 	 	 	12	 	 	 	9	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	316	 	
Long-term debt maturities including interest
payments(2)	 	 	585	 	 	 	71	 	 	 	646	 	 	 	347	 	 	 	29	 	 	 	661	 	 	 	2,339	 	
Net terminal obligation pursuant to Venture Agreement	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	263	 	 	 	263	 	
Other	 	 	2	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total contractual obligations	 	$	866	 	 	$	192	 	 	$	722	 	 	$	411	 	 	$	87	 	 	$	1,009	 	 	$	3,287	 	

 

			
(1)		In October 2006, the Company entered into an ITS Agreement with HP, a third-party service provider. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the ITS Agreement, HP is providing certain information technology and related services as well as information technology equipment through an operating lease. The services and operating lease began in March 2007 and will continue through October 2013. The total minimum contractual obligations at June 30, 2007, are $241, of which $17 are included in operating leases. The minimum contractual obligations are based on an annual service fee that will be adjusted periodically based upon updates to services and equipment provided.	
 		
(2)		The interest rate in effect as of June 30, 2007, was used to estimate the future interest payments on the floating rate debt. Refer to Note 10 for terms of the Company’s long-term debt.	
 
Purchase obligations are defined as purchase agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including quantity, price and the approximate timing of the transaction. These obligations are related primarily to short-term advertising and inventory purchases. For purchase obligations subject to variable price and/or quantity provisions, an estimate of the price and/or quantity has been made. Examples of the Company’s purchase obligations include firm commitments for raw material purchases and contract manufacturing services, utility agreements, capital-expenditure agreements, software acquisition and license commitments, and service contracts.

12

 

off balance sheet arrangements
 
In conjunction with divestitures and other transactions, the Company may provide indemnifications relating to the enforceability of trademarks, pre-existing legal, tax, environmental and employee liabilities, as well as provisions for product returns and other items. The Company has indemnification agreements in effect that specify a maximum possible indemnification exposure. The Company’s aggregate maximum exposure from these agreements is $291, which consists primarily of an indemnity of up to $250 made to Henkel in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement, subject to a minimum threshold of $12 before any payments would be made. The general representations and warranties made by the Company in connection with the Henkel Share Exchange Agreement were made to guarantee statements of fact at the time of the transaction closing and pertain to environmental, legal and other matters.
 
In addition to the indemnifications related to the general representations and warranties, the Company entered into an agreement with Henkel regarding certain tax matters. The Company made certain representations of fact as of the closing date of the exchange transaction and certain representations and warranties regarding future performance designed to preserve the tax-free status of the exchange transaction. In general, the Company agreed to be responsible for Henkel’s taxes on the transaction if the Company’s actions result in a breach of the representations and warranties in a manner that causes the share-exchange to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment. Henkel has agreed to similar obligations. The Company is unable to estimate the amount of maximum potential liability relating to the tax indemnification as the agreement does not specify a maximum amount, and the Company does not have the information that would be required to calculate this exposure. The Company does note, however, that the potential tax exposure, if any, could be very significant as the Company believes Henkel’s tax basis in the shares exchanged is low, and the value of the subsidiary stock transferred to Henkel in the exchange transaction was approximately $2,800. Although the agreement does not specify an indemnification term, any exposure under the agreement would be limited to taxes assessed prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations period for assessing taxes on the share exchange transaction.
 
The Company is a party to letters of credit of $24, primarily related to one of its insurance carriers.
 
The Company has not recorded any liabilities on any of the aforementioned guarantees at June 30, 2007.
 
CONTINGENCIES
 
The Company is involved in certain environmental matters, including Superfund and other response actions at various locations. The Company has a recorded liability of $23 and $27 at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for its share of the related aggregate future remediation cost. One matter in Dickinson County, Michigan, for which the Company is jointly and severally liable, accounts for a substantial majority of the recorded liability at both June 30, 2007 and 2006. The Company is subject to a cost-sharing arrangement with another party for this matter, under which the Company has agreed to be liable for 24.3% of the aggregate remediation and associated costs, other than legal fees, as the Company and the other party are each responsible for their own such fees. The other party in this matter reported a substantial net loss for calendar year 2006. If the other party with whom Clorox shares joint and several liability is unable to pay its share of the response and remediation obligations, Clorox would likely be responsible for such obligations. In October 2004, the Company and the other party agreed to a consent judgment with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, which sets forth certain remediation goals and monitoring activities. Based on the current status of this matter, and with the assistance of environmental consultants, the Company maintains an undiscounted liability representing its best estimate of its share of costs associated with the capital expenditures, maintenance and other costs to be incurred over an estimated 30-year remediation period. The most significant components of the liability relate to the estimated costs associated with the remediation of groundwater contamination and excess levels of subterranean methane deposits. Currently, the Company cannot accurately predict the timing of the payments that will likely be made under this estimated obligation. In addition, the Company’s estimated loss exposure is sensitive to a variety of uncertain factors, including the efficacy of remediation efforts, changes in remediation requirements and the timing, varying costs and alternative clean-up technologies that may become available in the future. Although it is possible that the Company’s exposure may exceed the amount recorded, any amount of such additional exposures, or range of exposures, is not estimable at this time.

13

 

On August 4, 2006, a derivative action purportedly on behalf of the Company was filed in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County, against certain current and former directors and officers of the Company. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties and waste of corporate assets. These allegations relate to the non-cash compensation expense the Company recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, following a review of its stock option practices. The complaint demands, among other forms of relief, judgment in the form of monetary damages sustained by the Company as a result of such practices. On September 1, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the case. On November 3, 2006, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming additional defendants and asserting additional claims including allegations of violations of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On December 1, 2006, the Company removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On December 22, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On April 27, 2007, the parties entered into a stipulation whereby they agreed, subject to court approval, that the amended complaint will be dismissed and that the plaintiff will have until May 30, 2007, to demand that the Board of Directors pursue the claims in the amended complaint on behalf of the Company. The plaintiff has sent the Board a demand letter and the Board is currently reviewing this matter. The plaintiff will have 30 days from the date of the Board’s response to this demand letter in which to file a second amended complaint challenging the Board’s decision.
 
While there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of this action, the Company does not believe that its resolution will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flow. Since the Company believes that the likelihood of sustaining a material loss is remote, the Company has not accrued a liability at June 30, 2007.
 
The Company is also subject to various other lawsuits and claims relating to issues such as contract disputes, product liability, patents and trademarks, advertising, employee and other matters. Although the results of claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these matters, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
 
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
 
As a multinational company, the Company is exposed to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations, changes in commodity prices, interest-rate risk and other types of market risk. In the normal course of business, the Company manages its exposure to market risk using contractual agreements and a variety of derivative instruments. The Company’s objective in managing its exposure to market risk is to limit the impact of fluctuations on earnings and cash flow through the use of swaps, forward purchases, options and futures contracts. Derivative contracts are entered into for nontrading purposes with major credit-worthy institutions, thereby decreasing the risk of credit loss.
 
Sensitivity Analysis
 
For fiscal year 2007, the Company’s exposure to market risk was estimated using sensitivity analyses, which illustrates the change in the fair value of a derivative financial instrument assuming hypothetical changes in foreign exchange rates, market rates or prices. The results of the sensitivity analyses for foreign-currency derivative contracts and commodity derivative contracts are summarized below. Actual changes in foreign-exchange rates or market prices may differ from the hypothetical changes, and any changes in the fair value of the contracts, real or hypothetical, would be partly offset by an inverse change in the value of the underlying hedged items.
 
The Company periodically assesses and takes action to mitigate its exposure to interest-rate risk, and as of June 30, 2007, the Company had no outstanding interest-rate contracts.
 
Foreign Currency Derivative Contracts
 
The Company seeks to minimize the impact of certain foreign-currency fluctuations by hedging transactional exposures with foreign-currency forward and option contracts. The Company’s foreign-currency transactional exposures pertaining to derivative contracts exist primarily with the Canadian and Australian Dollar, and certain other currencies. Based on a hypothetical decrease (or increase) of 10% in the value of the U.S. Dollar against the

14

 

currencies for which the Company has derivative instruments at June 30, 2007, the Company would incur foreign-currency derivative losses (or gains) of $4.
 
Commodity Derivative Contracts
 
The Company is exposed to changes in the price of commodities used as raw materials in the manufacturing of its products. These commodities include, among others, chlor-alkali, linerboard, diesel, solvent, jet fuel, soybean oil and corn. The Company uses various strategies to manage cost exposures on certain raw material purchases with the objective of obtaining more predictable costs for these commodities, including long-term commodity purchase contracts and commodity derivative contracts. Based on a hypothetical decrease (or increase) of 10% in commodity prices, the estimated fair value of the Company’s commodity derivative contracts would decrease (or increase) by $7, resulting in decreases (or increases) to accumulated other comprehensive income and net earnings or losses of $7 for fiscal year 2007.
 
The Company uses different methodologies, when necessary, to estimate the fair value of its derivative contracts. The estimated fair values of the majority of the Company’s contracts are based on quoted market prices, traded exchange market prices, or broker price quotations, and represent the estimated amounts that the Company would pay or receive to terminate the contracts.
 
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
 
In June 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48. This interpretation prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement standard, as well as clear criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing, classifying and measuring tax positions for financial statement purposes. The interpretation also requires expanded disclosure with respect to uncertainties as they relate to income tax accounting. FIN 48 will be adopted by the Company at the beginning of its fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, as required. The cumulative effect of the interpretation will be reflected as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings upon adoption. While the Company is still assessing the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements, it currently estimates that the cumulative effect of the adoption of FIN 48 may be a decrease to shareholders’ equity of between $8 and $10 and a reclassification of between $45 and $55 from working capital accounts to long-term liabilities. The estimated impact is subject to revision as the Company completes its analysis.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements . This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement will be adopted by the Company beginning in its fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, as required. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 . SFAS No. 159 provides the option to measure, at fair value, eligible financial instrument items using fair value, which are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value. The irrevocable decision to measure items at fair value is made at specified election dates on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Changes in that instrument’s fair value must be recognized in current earnings in subsequent reporting periods. If elected, the first measurement to fair value is reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earning in the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on its consolidated financial statements, if it elects to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. The standard is effective for the Company beginning in its fiscal year ending June 30, 2009.
 
In June 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R ) (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an entity to recognize in its balance sheet the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation (the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement plans). SFAS No. 158 also requires an entity to recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan within accumulated other comprehensive income, in the year in which such changes

15

 

occur, to the extent such changes are not recognized in earnings as components of net periodic benefit cost. This statement also requires plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the Company’s balance sheet date, which is consistent with the Company’s practice.
 
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, the Company accounted for its defined benefit post-retirement plans under SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions . SFAS No. 87 required that a liability (minimum pension liability) be recorded when the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) liability exceeded the fair value of plan assets. Any adjustment was recorded as a non-cash charge to accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. SFAS No. 106 required that the liability recorded should represent the actuarial present value of all future benefits attributable to an employee’s service rendered to date. Under both SFAS No. 87 and No. 106, changes in the funded status were disclosed but not immediately recognized; rather they were deferred and recognized ratably over future periods. Employee benefit plans and the impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 are more fully described in Note 20.
 
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
 
The methods, estimates, and judgments the Company uses in applying its most critical accounting policies have a significant impact on the results the Company reports in its consolidated financial statements. Specific areas requiring the application of management’s estimates and judgment include assumptions pertaining to credit worthiness of customers, future product volume and pricing estimates, accruals for promotion programs, foreign-currency exchange rates, interest rates, discount rates, useful lives of assets, future cost trends, investment returns, tax strategies, and other external market and economic conditions. Accordingly, a different financial presentation could result depending on the judgments, estimates, or assumptions that are used. The most critical accounting policies are those that are most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and require the Company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often estimating the outcome of future events that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s most critical accounting policies are: revenue recognition; valuation of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; employee benefits, including estimates related to share-based compensation; and income taxes. The Company’s critical accounting policies have been reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. A summary of the Company’s significant accounting policies is contained in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Sales are recognized as revenue when the risk of loss and title pass to the customer and when all of the following have occurred: a firm sales arrangement exists, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Sales are recorded net of allowances for trade-promotions and other discounts.
 
The Company routinely commits to one-time or on-going trade-promotion programs with customers. Programs include cooperative marketing programs, shelf-price reductions, advantageous end-of-aisle or in-store displays of the Company’s products, graphics, introductory marketing funds and other trade-promotion activities conducted by the customer. Costs related to these programs are recorded as a reduction of sales. The Company’s estimated costs of trade-promotions incorporate historical sales and spending trends by customer and category. The determination of these estimated costs requires judgment and may change in the future as a result of changes in customer promotion participation, particularly for new programs and for programs related to the introduction of new products. Final determination of the total cost of promotion is dependent upon customers providing information about proof of performance and other information related to the promotional event. This process of analyzing and settling trade-promotion programs with customers could impact the Company’s results of operations and trade spending accruals depending on how actual results of the programs compare to original estimates. If the Company’s June 30, 2007, accrual estimates were to differ by 10%, the impact on net sales would be approximately $7.
 
Valuation Of Intangible Assets And Property, Plant And Equipment
 
The carrying values of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . The Company’s impairment review is based on a discounted cash flow approach that requires significant management judgment with respect to future volume,

16

 

revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working capital use, foreign-exchange rates, devaluation, inflation and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. Impairment occurs when book value of a reporting unit exceeds the fair value of that reporting unit. An impairment charge is recorded for the difference between book value and fair value of the reporting unit, which is determined based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows. The Company tests its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment in the third fiscal quarter unless there are indications during an interim period that assets may have become impaired. The Company uses its judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual valuations. Indicators such as unexpected adverse economic factors, unanticipated technological changes or competitive activities, loss of key personnel and acts by governments and courts may signal that an asset has become impaired.
 
The Company performed its annual review of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in the third quarter of fiscal year 2007 and determined that there were no instances of impairment. A 10% decline in the fair values of the indefinite-lived intangible assets would not have changed the results of the Company’s annual review above.
 
Property, plant and equipment and finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets . The Company’s impairment review requires significant management judgment including estimating the future success of product lines, future sales volumes, revenue and expense growth rates, alternative uses for the assets and estimated proceeds from the disposal of the assets. The Company conducts quarterly reviews for idle and underutilized equipment, and reviews business plans for possible impairment indicators. Impairment occurs when the carrying value of the asset exceeds its estimated future undiscounted cash flows and the impairment is viewed as other than temporary. When an impairment is indicated, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the asset’s book value and its fair market value. Depending on the asset, fair market value may be determined either by use of a discounted cash flow model or by reference to estimated selling values of assets in similar condition. The use of different assumptions would increase or decrease the estimated fair value of assets and would increase or decrease any impairment measurement.
 
Employee Benefits
 
The Company has various individual and group compensation and retirement income programs, including an incentive compensation program, a profit sharing element of The Clorox Company 401(k) plan and share-based compensation programs.
 
incentive compensation and profit sharing programs
 
Company contributions to the 401(k) plan and payments to managerial staff for the annual incentive compensation program are subject to the Company achieving certain fiscal year performance targets. The 401(k) plan has two components: a 401(k) component and a profit sharing component. Employee contributions made to the 401(k) component are partially matched with Company contributions. The Company’s contributions to the profit sharing component above 3% of eligible employee earnings are discretionary and are based on achieving financial targets including sales growth, earnings per share and asset utilization. The Company accrues for these costs quarterly based on estimated annual results. At June 30, 2007, the Company accrued $21 for such costs and anticipates making a profit sharing contribution to the 401(k) plan in the first quarter of fiscal year 2008.
 
share-based compensation
 
The Company grants various nonqualified stock-based compensation awards, including stock options, performance units and restricted stock. The share-based compensation expense and related income tax benefit recognized in the income statement in fiscal year 2007 was $49 and $19, respectively. As of June 30, 2007, there was $59 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options, restricted stock, and performance unit awards, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average remaining vesting period of 2 years.
 
The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option award on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which requires management to make estimates regarding expected option life, stock price volatility and other assumptions. Groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Previously, under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation , the

17

 

Company did not utilize separate employee groupings in the determination of stock option values for disclosure purposes. The Company now estimates stock option forfeitures based on historical data for each employee grouping, and adjusts the rate to expected forfeitures periodically. The adjustment of the forfeiture rate will result in a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed. During fiscal year 2007, adjustments totaled less than $1.
 
The use of different assumptions in the Black-Scholes valuation model could lead to a different estimate of the fair value of each stock option. The expected volatility is based on implied volatility from publicly traded options on the Company’s stock at the date of grant, historical implied volatility of the Company’s publicly traded options and other factors. If the Company’s assumption for the volatility rate increased by one percentage point, the fair value of options granted in fiscal year 2007 would have increased by less than $1. The expected life of the stock options is based on observed historical exercise patterns. If the Company’s assumption for the expected life increased by one year, the fair value of options granted in fiscal year 2007 would have increased by $1.
 
The Company’s performance unit grants subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R provide for the issuance of common stock to certain managerial staff and executive management if the Company achieves specified performance targets. The performance unit grants generally vest after three years. The fair value of each grant issued is estimated on the date of grant based on the current market price of the stock. The total amount of compensation expense recognized reflects estimated forfeiture rates, and the initial assumption that performance goals will be achieved. Compensation expense is adjusted quarterly based on management’s assessment of the probability that performance goals will be achieved. If such goals are not met or it is determined that achievement of performance goals is not probable, any previously recognized compensation expense is reversed.
 
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company granted to certain members of management performance units that provided for the issuance of common stock if the Company’s total shareholder return over a period of time met specified performance goals based on comparisons with the performance of a selected peer group of companies. In fiscal year 2007, after determining it was likely that certain performance goals would be met, the Company recorded the fiscal year 2004 performance unit grants, which are scheduled to vest in September 2007 if the performance goals are met. At June 30, 2007, the Company had recognized $5 of compensation expense associated with the fiscal year 2004 performance unit grants. If the performance goals for its fiscal year 2004 performance unit grants are not met, the Company may reverse all or a portion of the compensation expense recognized to date. The unrecognized expense for the performance unit grants scheduled to vest in September 2007 is less than $1. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of share-based compensation plans.
 
retirement income plans
 
The determination of net periodic pension cost is based on actuarial assumptions including a discount rate to reflect the time value of money, employee compensation rates, demographic assumptions to determine the probability and timing of benefit payments, and the long-term rate of return on plan assets. The selection of assumptions is based on historical trends and known economic and market conditions at the time of valuation. Actual results could differ from expected results because actuarial assumptions and estimates are used. In the calculation of pension expense related to domestic plans for 2007, the Company used a long-term rate of return on plan assets assumption of 8.25% and a beginning of year discount rate assumption of 6.25%. The use of a different discount rate or long-term rate of return on domestic plan assets can significantly impact pension expense. For example, at June 30, 2007, a decrease of 1% in the discount rate would increase pension liability by approximately $50, and potentially increase fiscal year 2008 pension expense by $4. A 1% decrease in the long-term rate of return on plan assets would increase future pension expense in fiscal year 2008 by $3. The Company also has defined benefit pension plans for eligible international employees, including Canadian and Australian employees, and different assumptions may be used in the determination of pension expense for those plans, as appropriate. Refer to Note 20 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of pension and other retirement plan obligations.

18

 

Income Taxes
 
The Company’s effective tax rate is based on expected income by tax jurisdiction, statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities available to the Company in the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Significant judgment is required in determining the Company’s effective tax rate and in evaluating its tax positions.
 
The Company maintains valuation allowances where it is likely that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the Company’s income tax provision in the period of change. In determining whether a valuation allowance is warranted, the Company takes into account such factors as prior earnings history, expected future earnings, unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect utilization of a deferred tax asset, carry-back and carry-forward periods, and tax strategies that could potentially enhance the likelihood of realization of a deferred tax asset. Valuation allowances maintained by the Company relate mostly to deferred tax assets arising from the Company’s ability to use net operating losses in certain foreign countries.
 
In addition to valuation allowances, the Company establishes accruals for certain tax contingencies when, despite the belief that the Company’s tax return positions are fully supported, the Company believes that certain tax positions are likely to be challenged and that the Company’s positions may not be fully sustained. The tax-contingency accruals are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law and emerging legislation. The Company’s effective tax rate includes the impact of tax-contingency accruals as considered appropriate by management.
 
A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which the Company has accrued, is audited and finally resolved. The number of years with open tax audits varies by jurisdiction. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, the Company believes its tax-contingency accruals are adequate to address known tax contingencies. Favorable resolution of such matters could be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could increase the effective tax rate. Any resolution of a tax issue may require the use of cash in the year of resolution. The Company’s tax-contingency accruals are presented in the balance sheet within accrued liabilities.
 
In subsequent years, tax-contingency accruals will cease to be evaluated under the principles of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies . Instead, uncertain tax positions will be evaluated under the principles of FIN 48. For additional information, refer to the information set forth under the caption “New Accounting Pronouncements” above.
 
United States income taxes and foreign withholding taxes are not provided when foreign earnings are indefinitely reinvested in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 23, Accounting for Income Taxes, Special Areas. The Company determines whether its foreign subsidiaries will invest their undistributed earnings indefinitely and reassesses this determination on a periodic basis. Change to the Company’s determination may be warranted based on the Company’s experience as well as plans regarding future international operations and expected remittances.
 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
 
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (this Report), including the exhibits hereto and the information incorporated by reference herein, contains “forward looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and such forward looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Except for historical information, matters discussed above, including statements about future volume, sales, costs, cost savings, earnings, cash outflows, plans, objectives, expectations, growth, or profitability, are forward looking statements based on management’s estimates, assumptions and projections. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” and variations on such words, and similar expressions, are intended to identify such forward looking statements. These forward looking statements are only predictions, subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results could differ materially from those discussed above. Important factors that could affect performance and cause results to differ materially from management’s expectations are described in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis

19

 

of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Report, as updated from time to time in the Company’s SEC filings. These factors include, but are not limited to, the success of the Company’s previously announced Centennial Strategy; the final purchase price and number of shares repurchased under the Company’s accelerated share repurchase agreement; general economic and marketplace conditions and events; competitors’ actions; the Company’s costs, including changes in exposure to commodity costs such as resin, diesel, chlor-alkali and agricultural commodities; increases in energy costs; consumer and customer reaction to price increases; customer-specific ordering patterns and trends; the Company’s actual cost performance; changes in the Company’s tax rate; any future supply constraints that may affect key commodities; risks inherent in sole-supplier relationships; risks related to customer concentration; risks arising out of natural disasters; risks related to the handling and/or transportation of hazardous substances, including but not limited to chlorine; risks inherent in litigation; risks relating to international operations; risks inherent in maintaining an effective system of internal controls, including the potential impact of acquisitions or the use of third-party service providers; the ability to manage and realize the benefit of joint ventures and other cooperative relationships, including the Company’s joint venture regarding the Company’s Glad ® plastic bags, wraps and containers business, and the agreement relating to the provision of information technology and related services by a third party; the success of new products; risks relating to acquisitions, mergers and divestitures; risks relating to changes in the Company’s capital structure; and the ability of the Company to successfully manage tax, regulatory, product liability, intellectual property, environmental and other legal matters, including the risk resulting from joint and several liability for environmental contingencies. In addition, the Company’s future performance is subject to risks related to its November 2004 share exchange transaction with Henkel KGaA, the tax indemnification obligations and the actual level of debt costs. Declines in cash flow, whether resulting from tax payments, debt payments, share repurchases, interest cost increases greater than management expects, or increases in debt or changes in credit ratings, or otherwise, could adversely affect the Company’s earnings.
 
The Company’s forward looking statements in this report are based on management’s current views and assumptions regarding future events and speak only as of their dates. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by the federal securities laws.

20

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
The Clorox Company

Years ended June 30	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 	 	
Dollars in millions, except per share amounts	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 		
Net sales	 	$	4,847	 	 	$	4,644	 	 	$	4,388	 	
Cost of products sold	 	 	2,756	 	 	 	2,685	 	 	 	2,493	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gross profit	 	 	2,091	 	 	 	1,959	 	 	 	1,895	 	
Selling and administrative expenses	 	 	642	 	 	 	631	 	 	 	551	 	
Advertising costs	 	 	474	 	 	 	450	 	 	 	435	 	
Research and development costs	 	 	108	 	 	 	99	 	 	 	88	 	
Restructuring and asset impairment costs	 	 	13	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	36	 	
Interest expense	 	 	113	 	 	 	127	 	 	 	79	 	
Other (income) expense:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Equity earnings and gain on exchange of Henkel Iberica, S.A. 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(25	)	
Other, net	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(2	)	 	 	2	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	743	 	 	 	653	 	 	 	729	 	
Income taxes on continuing operations	 	 	247	 	 	 	210	 	 	 	214	 	
Reversal of deferred taxes from equity investment in Henkel Iberica, S.A. 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(2	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings from continuing operations	 	 	496	 	 	 	443	 	 	 	517	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Discontinued operations:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain on exchange	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	550	 	
Earnings from exchanged businesses	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	37	 	
Reversal of deferred taxes from exchanged businesses	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	6	 	
Income tax benefit (expense) on discontinued operations	 	 	5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(14	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings from discontinued operations	 	 	5	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	579	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	501	 	 	$	444	 	 	$	1,096	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings per common share	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	3.28	 	 	$	2.94	 	 	$	2.92	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	3.28	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic net earnings per common share	 	$	3.31	 	 	$	2.95	 	 	$	6.20	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	3.23	 	 	$	2.89	 	 	$	2.88	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	3.23	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted net earnings per common share	 	$	3.26	 	 	$	2.90	 	 	$	6.11	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic	 	 	151,445	 	 	 	150,545	 	 	 	176,586	 	
Diluted	 	 	153,935	 	 	 	153,001	 	 	 	179,176	 	

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

21

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The Clorox Company

As of June 30	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 	 	
Dollars in millions, except share amounts	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 		
ASSETS	
Current assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash and cash equivalents	 	$	182	 	 	$	192	 	
Receivables, net	 	 	460	 	 	 	435	 	
Inventories, net	 	 	309	 	 	 	292	 	
Other current assets	 	 	81	 	 	 	88	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current assets	 	 	1,032	 	 	 	1,007	 	
Property, plant and equipment, net	 	 	976	 	 	 	1,004	 	
Goodwill	 	 	855	 	 	 	744	 	
Trademarks and other intangible assets, net	 	 	613	 	 	 	604	 	
Other assets	 	 	190	 	 	 	257	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total assets	 	$	3,666	 	 	$	3,616	 	

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	
Current liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Notes and loans payable	 	$	74	 	 	$	156	 	
Current maturities of long-term debt	 	 	500	 	 	 	152	 	
Accounts payable	 	 	329	 	 	 	329	 	
Accrued liabilities	 	 	507	 	 	 	474	 	
Income taxes payable	 	 	17	 	 	 	19	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current liabilities	 	 	1,427	 	 	 	1,130	 	
Long-term debt	 	 	1,462	 	 	 	1,966	 	
Other liabilities	 	 	516	 	 	 	547	 	
Deferred income taxes	 	 	90	 	 	 	129	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities	 	 	3,495	 	 	 	3,772	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commitments and contingencies	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Common stock: $1.00 par value; 750,000,000 shares authorized; 158,741,461 and 249,826,934 shares issued at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively; and 151,256,460 and 151,298,366 shares outstanding at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively	 	 	159	 	 	 	250	 	
Additional paid-in capital	 	 	481	 	 	 	397	 	
Retained earnings	 	 	185	 	 	 	3,939	 	
Treasury shares, at cost: 7,485,001 and 98,528,568 shares at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively	 	 	(445	)	 	 	(4,527	)	
Accumulated other comprehensive net losses	 	 	(209	)	 	 	(215	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)	 	 	171	 	 	 	(156	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	 	$	3,666	 	 	$	3,616	 	

 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

22

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
The Clorox Company

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Accumulated	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Other	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Common Stock	 	 	Additional	 	 	 	 	 	Treasury Shares	 	 	Comprehensive	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Total	 	
 	 	Shares	 	 	 	 	 	Paid-in	 	 	Retained	 	 	Shares	 	 	 	 	 	Net (Losses)	 	 	Unearned	 	 	 	 	 	Comprehensive	 	
 	 	(000)	 	 	Amount	 	 	Capital	 	 	Earnings	 	 	(000)	 	 	Amount	 	 	Gains	 	 	Compensation	 	 	Total	 	 	Income	 	
 	 	
Dollars in millions, except share amounts	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 		
Balance at June 30, 2004	 	 	249,827	 	 	$	250	 	 	$	301	 	 	$	2,846	 	 	 	(36,838	)	 	$	(1,570	)	 	$	(274	)	 	$	(13	)	 	$	1,540	 	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	1,096	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	1,096	 	 	$	1,096	 	
Share Exchange with Henkel KGaA	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(61,387	)	 	 	(2,843	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(2,843	)	 	 	 	 	
Translation adjustments resulting from the Henkel KGaA exchange, net of tax of $(10)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	21	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	21	 	 	 	21	 	
Other translation adjustments, net of tax of $(2)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	29	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	29	 	 	 	29	 	
Change in valuation of derivatives, net of tax of $(3)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	6	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	6	 	 	 	6	 	
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(118	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	(118	)	 	 	(118	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total comprehensive income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	1,034	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(243	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(243	)	 	 	 	 	
Employee stock plans	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	27	 	 	 	(15	)	 	 	2,831	 	 	 	110	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(3	)	 	 	119	 	 	 	 	 	
Treasury stock purchased	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(2,750	)	 	 	(160	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(160	)	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance at June 30, 2005	 	 	249,827	 	 	 	250	 	 	 	328	 	 	 	3,684	 	 	 	(98,144	)	 	 	(4,463	)	 	 	(336	)	 	 	(16	)	 	 	(553	)	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	444	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	444	 	 	$	444	 	
Translation adjustments, net of tax of $(0)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	2	 	 	 	2	 	
Change in valuation of derivatives, net of tax of $(1)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	1	 	
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	118	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	118	 	 	 	118	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total comprehensive income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	565	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(174	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(174	)	 	 	 	 	
Employee stock plans	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	85	 	 	 	(15	)	 	 	2,015	 	 	 	71	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	141	 	 	 	 	 	
Reclassification upon adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123-R	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(16	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	16	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	 	 	
Treasury stock purchased	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(2,400	)	 	 	(135	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(135	)	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance at June 30, 2006	 	 	249,827	 	 	 	250	 	 	 	397	 	 	 	3,939	 	 	 	(98,529	)	 	 	(4,527	)	 	 	(215	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(156	)	 	 	 	 	
Comprehensive income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	501	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	501	 	 	$	501	 	
Translation adjustments, net of tax of $3	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	47	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	47	 	 	 	47	 	
Change in valuation of derivatives, net of tax of $1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(3	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	(3	)	 	 	(3	)	
Minimum pension liability adjustments, net of tax	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	1	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total comprehensive income	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	$	546	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Adjustment to initially apply SFAS No. 158, net of tax	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(39	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	(39	)	 	 	 	 	
Dividends	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(200	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(200	)	 	 	 	 	
Employee stock plans	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	84	 	 	 	(9	)	 	 	2,358	 	 	 	100	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	175	 	 	 	 	 	
Treasury stock purchased	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(2,400	)	 	 	(155	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	(155	)	 	 	 	 	
Treasury stock retirement	 	 	(91,086	)	 	 	(91	)	 	 	 	 	 	 	(4,046	)	 	 	91,086	 	 	 	4,137	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance at June 30, 2007	 	 	158,741	 	 	$	159	 	 	$	481	 	 	$	185	 	 	 	(7,485	)	 	$	(445	)	 	$	(209	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	171	 	 	 	 	 	

 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

23

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
The Clorox Company

Years ended June 30	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 	 	
Dollars in millions	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 		
Operating activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	501	 	 	$	444	 	 	$	1,096	 	
Deduct: Earnings from discontinued operations	 	 	5	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	579	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings from continuing operations	 	 	496	 	 	 	443	 	 	 	517	 	
Adjustments to reconcile earnings from continuing operations to net cash provided by continuing operations:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Depreciation and amortization	 	 	192	 	 	 	188	 	 	 	183	 	
Share-based compensation	 	 	49	 	 	 	77	 	 	 	11	 	
Deferred income taxes	 	 	(15	)	 	 	(28	)	 	 	(45	)	
Restructuring and asset impairment activities	 	 	13	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	38	 	
Gain on exchange of Henkel Iberica, S.A. 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(20	)	
Other	 	 	17	 	 	 	44	 	 	 	41	 	
Changes in:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Receivables, net	 	 	(15	)	 	 	(29	)	 	 	33	 	
Inventories, net	 	 	(8	)	 	 	26	 	 	 	(17	)	
Other current assets	 	 	13	 	 	 	(11	)	 	 	5	 	
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	 	 	(30	)	 	 	(50	)	 	 	54	 	
Income taxes payable	 	 	7	 	 	 	15	 	 	 	22	 	
Settlement of income tax contingencies (Note 19)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(151	)	 	 	(94	)	
Pension contributions to qualified plans	 	 	(10	)	 	 	(10	)	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash provided by continuing operations	 	 	709	 	 	 	514	 	 	 	728	 	
Net cash provided by discontinued operations	 	 	—	 	 	 	8	 	 	 	37	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash provided by operations	 	 	709	 	 	 	522	 	 	 	765	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Investing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Capital expenditures	 	 	(147	)	 	 	(180	)	 	 	(151	)	
Businesses acquired	 	 	(123	)	 	 	(16	)	 	 	—	 	
Proceeds from termination of investment in life insurance contract (Note 8)	 	 	—	 	 	 	41	 	 	 	—	 	
Other	 	 	2	 	 	 	(6	)	 	 	(3	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash used for investing activities	 	 	(268	)	 	 	(161	)	 	 	(154	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Financing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Notes and loans payable, net	 	 	(87	)	 	 	(204	)	 	 	68	 	
Long-term debt borrowings	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1,635	 	
Long-term debt repayments	 	 	(150	)	 	 	(29	)	 	 	—	 	
Proceeds from option exercise pursuant to Venture Agreement (Note 12)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	133	 	
Treasury stock acquired from related party, Henkel KGaA (Note 2)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(2,119	)	
Treasury stock purchased from non-affiliates	 	 	(155	)	 	 	(135	)	 	 	(160	)	
Cash dividends paid	 	 	(183	)	 	 	(173	)	 	 	(201	)	
Issuance of common stock for employee stock plans and other	 	 	119	 	 	 	79	 	 	 	92	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net cash used for financing activities	 	 	(456	)	 	 	(462	)	 	 	(552	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	 	 	5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	 	 	(10	)	 	 	(101	)	 	 	61	 	
Cash and cash equivalents:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Beginning of year	 	 	192	 	 	 	293	 	 	 	232	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
End of year	 	$	182	 	 	$	192	 	 	$	293	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Supplemental cash flow information:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cash paid for:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest	 	$	117	 	 	$	132	 	 	$	81	 	
Income taxes, net of refunds	 	$	272	 	 	$	373	 	 	$	335	 	
Non-cash investing and financing activities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends declared and accrued but not paid	 	$	61	 	 	$	43	 	 	$	42	 	
Share Exchange Agreement	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
As part of the fiscal year 2005 Share Exchange Agreement, the Company obtained 61,386,509 shares of its common stock in exchange for businesses valued at $745 and cash (Note 2)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

24

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Clorox Company
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts)

NOTE 1.  	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES	
 
Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation
 
The Company is principally engaged in the production, marketing and sales of consumer products through mass merchandisers, grocery stores and other retail outlets. The consolidated financial statements include the statements of the Company and its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts were eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications were made in the consolidated financial statements and related notes to consolidated financial statements to conform to the current year presentation.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts and related disclosures. Specific areas, among others, requiring the application of management’s estimates and judgment include assumptions pertaining to accruals for consumer and trade-promotion programs, future product volume and pricing estimates, future cost trends, pension and post-employment benefits, future cash flows associated with impairment testing of goodwill and other long-lived assets, credit worthiness of customers, potential income tax assessments and tax strategies and various insurance matters. Actual results could materially differ from estimates and assumptions made.
 
New Accounting Pronouncements
 
In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Interpretation No. (FIN) 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109 . This interpretation prescribes a consistent recognition threshold and measurement standard, as well as clear criteria for subsequently recognizing, derecognizing, classifying and measuring tax positions for financial statement purposes. The interpretation also requires expanded disclosure with respect to uncertainties as they relate to income tax accounting. FIN 48 will be adopted by the Company at the beginning of its fiscal year ending June 30, 2008, as required. The cumulative effect of the interpretation will be reflected as an adjustment to beginning retained earnings upon adoption. While the Company is still assessing the impact of FIN 48 on its consolidated financial statements, it currently estimates that the cumulative effect of the adoption of FIN 48 may be a decrease to shareholders’ equity of between $8 and $10 and a reclassification of between $45 and $55 from working capital accounts to long-term liabilities. The estimated impact is subject to revision as the Company completes its analysis.
 
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements . This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with U.S. GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement will be adopted by the Company beginning in its fiscal year ending June 30, 2009, as required. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial statements.
 
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 . SFAS No. 159 provides the option to measure, at fair value, eligible financial instrument items using fair value, which are not otherwise required to be measured at fair value. The irrevocable decision to measure items at fair value is made at specified election dates on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Changes in that instrument’s fair value must be recognized in current earnings in subsequent reporting periods. If elected, the first measurement to fair value is reported as a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earning in the year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 159 on its consolidated financial statements, if it elects to measure eligible financial instruments at fair value. The standard is effective for the Company beginning in its fiscal year ending June 30, 2009.

25

 

		
NOTE 1.  	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)	
 
In June 2007, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R) (SFAS No. 158). SFAS No. 158 requires an entity to recognize in its balance sheet the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation (the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for other postretirement plans). SFAS No. 158 also requires an entity to recognize changes in the funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan within accumulated other comprehensive income, in the year in which such changes occur, to the extent such changes are not recognized in earnings as components of net periodic benefit cost. This statement also requires plan assets and obligations to be measured as of the Company’s balance sheet date, which is consistent with the Company’s practice.
 
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, the Company accounted for its defined benefit post-retirement plans under SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions . SFAS No. 87 required that a liability (minimum pension liability) be recorded when the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) liability exceeded the fair value of plan assets. Any adjustment was recorded as a non-cash charge to accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity. SFAS No. 106 required that the liability recorded should represent the actuarial present value of all future benefits attributable to an employee’s service rendered to date. Under both SFAS No. 87 and No. 106, changes in the funded status were disclosed but not immediately recognized; rather they were deferred and recognized ratably over future periods. Employee benefit plans and the impact of adopting SFAS No. 158 are more fully described in Note 20.
 
Cash and Cash Equivalents
 
Cash equivalents consist of money market and other high quality instruments with an initial maturity of three months or less. Such investments are stated at cost, which approximates market value.
 
Inventories
 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. When necessary, the Company provides allowances to adjust the carrying value of its inventory to the lower of cost or market, including any costs to sell or dispose. Appropriate consideration is given to obsolescence, excessive inventory levels, product deterioration and other factors in evaluating net realizable value for the purposes of determining the lower of cost or market.
 
Property, Plant and Equipment
 
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization expense are calculated by the straight-line method using the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The following table provides estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment by asset classification:

 	 	Expected	 	
Classification	 	Useful Lives	 	
 		
Land improvements	 	 	10 - 30 years	 	
Buildings	 	 	10 - 40 years	 	
Machinery and equipment	 	 	3 - 15 years	 	
Computer equipment	 	 	3 years	 	
Capitalized software costs	 	 	3 - 7 years	 	

Property, plant and equipment to be held and used is reviewed at least annually for possible impairment. The Company’s impairment review is based on an estimate of the undiscounted cash flow at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows exist. Impairment occurs when the book value of the asset exceeds the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by the asset and the impairment is viewed as other than temporary. When an impairment is indicated, an impairment charge is recorded for the difference between the book value of the asset and its fair market value. Depending on the asset, fair market value may be determined either by use of a discounted cash flow model, or by reference to estimated selling values of assets in similar condition.

26

 

		
NOTE 1.  	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)	
 
Impairment Review of Intangible Assets
 
The carrying values of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for possible impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets . The Company’s impairment review is based on a discounted cash flow approach that requires significant management judgment with respect to future volume, revenue and expense growth rates, changes in working capital use, foreign-exchange rates, devaluation, inflation and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. Impairment occurs when book value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value of that reporting unit. An impairment charge is recorded for the difference between book value and fair value of the reporting unit, which is determined based on the net present value of estimated future cash flows. The Company tests its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment in the third fiscal quarter unless there are indications during an interim period that assets may have become impaired. The Company uses its judgment in assessing whether assets may have become impaired between annual valuations. Indicators such as unexpected adverse economic factors, unanticipated technological changes or competitive activities, loss of key personnel and acts by governments and courts may signal that an asset has become impaired.
 
Share-Based Compensation
 
Effective July 1, 2005, the Company began recording compensation expense associated with stock options and other forms of equity compensation in accordance with SFAS No. 123-R, Share-Based Payment, as interpreted by Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. The Company adopted the modified prospective transition method provided for under SFAS No. 123-R and, consequently, did not retroactively adjust results from prior periods. Under this transition method, compensation cost associated with stock options recognized in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, includes: 1) amortization related to the remaining unvested portion of all stock option awards granted prior to July 1, 2005, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation ; and 2) amortization related to all stock option awards granted on or after to July 1, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123-R.
 
Prior to July 1, 2005, the Company accounted for stock options according to the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees , and related interpretations, and therefore no related compensation expense was recorded for awards granted as it was believed that such awards had no intrinsic value. In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company recorded a pretax cumulative charge of $25 ($16 after-tax) in selling and administrative expenses related to certain grants dating back to the third quarter of fiscal year 1996 based upon the Company’s determination that such grants had intrinsic value on the applicable measurement dates of the option grants (Note 16).
 
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company presented all tax benefits resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the consolidated statement of cash flows. SFAS No. 123-R requires that cash flows resulting from tax deductions in excess of the cumulative compensation cost recognized for options exercised (excess tax benefits) be classified as financing cash flows. However, cash flows relating to excess tax benefits for employees directly involved in the manufacturing and/or distribution processes are classified as operating cash flows. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, $16 and $17, respectively, of excess tax benefits were generated from share-based payment arrangements, and were recognized as financing cash flows.

27

 

		
NOTE 1.  	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)	
 
For stock options granted prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, if compensation expense for the Company’s various stock option plans had been determined based upon estimated fair values at the grant dates in accordance with SFAS No. 123, the Company’s pro forma net earnings, and basic and diluted earnings per common share, would have been as follows for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005:

Net earnings:	 	 	 	 	
As reported	 	$	1,096	 	
Fair value-based expense, net of tax	 	 	(18	)	
 	 	 	 	 	
Pro forma	 	$	1,078	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings per common share:	 	 	 	 	
Basic	 	 	 	 	
As reported	 	$	6.20	 	
Pro forma	 	 	6.10	 	
Diluted	 	 	 	 	
As reported	 	$	6.11	 	
Pro forma	 	 	6.02	 	

Employee Benefits
 
The Company has qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans that cover substantially all domestic employees and certain international employees and provide health care benefits for domestic employees who meet age, participation and length of service requirements at retirement.
 
The Company accounts for its defined benefit and retirement health care plans using actuarial methods required by SFAS No. 87, Employers’ Accounting for Pensions and SFAS No. 106, Employers’ Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions , as amended by SFAS No. 158, respectively. These methods use an attribution approach that generally spreads “plan events” over the service lives of plan participants. Examples of plan events are plan amendments and changes in actuarial assumptions such as the expected return on plan assets, discount rate, and rate of compensation increase. The principle underlying the attribution approach is that employees render service over their service lives on a relatively “smooth” basis, and therefore the statement of earnings effects of defined benefit and retirement heath care plans are recognized in the same pattern.
 
One of the principal assumptions used in the net periodic benefit cost calculation is the expected return on plan assets. The required use of an expected return on plan assets may result in recognized pension expense or income that differs from the actual returns of those plan assets in any given year. Over time, however, the goal is for the expected long-term returns to approximate the actual returns and, therefore, the expectation is that the pattern of income and expense recognition should closely match the pattern of the services provided by the participants. The differences between actual and expected returns are recognized in the net periodic benefit cost calculation over the average remaining service period of the plan participants. In developing its expected return on plan assets, the Company considers the long-term actual returns relative to the mix of investments that comprise its plan assets and also develops estimates of future investment returns by considering external sources.
 
The Company follows the accounting guidance as specified in SFAS No. 112, Employers Accounting for Postemployment Benefits , for the recognition of certain disability benefits. The Company recognizes an actuarial-based obligation at the onset of disability for certain benefits provided to individuals after employment but before retirement that include medical, dental, vision, life and other benefits.
 
The Company also has various individual and group incentive compensation programs, including a performance unit program, a bonus program, and a profit sharing element of the Company 401(k) plan. The Company’s contributions to the profit sharing element of the 401(k) plan and payments to managerial staff for the annual bonus program are based on Company performance targets including sales growth and earnings per share. The Company

28

 

		
NOTE 1.  	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)	
 
also matches employee 401(k) contributions up to one thousand dollars per year. Further details of the performance units programs are included in Note 16.
 
Environmental Costs
 
The Company is involved in certain environmental remediation and on-going compliance activities. Accruals for environmental matters are recorded on a site-by-site basis when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s accruals reflect the anticipated participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective shares of the relevant costs. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation efforts progress or as additional technical or legal information becomes available. Actual costs to be incurred at identified sites in future periods may vary from the estimates, given the inherent uncertainties in evaluating environmental exposures. The aggregate accrual for environmental matters is included in other liabilities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets on an undiscounted basis due to the uncertainty and timing of future payments.
 
Restructuring Liabilities
 
The Company recognizes liabilities and expenses associated with exit and disposal costs when facilities are partially or completely closed. Employee termination and severance costs are recognized at the time the severance plan is approved, the amount of termination and severance costs can be estimated and the impacted group of employees is notified, provided the group will not be retained to render service beyond a minimum retention period. Other qualified exit and disposal costs are recognized and measured at fair value in the period in which the related liability is incurred.
 
Revenue Recognition
 
Sales are recognized as revenue when the risk of loss and title pass to the customer and when all of the following have occurred: a firm sales arrangement exists, pricing is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Sales are recorded net of allowances for returns, trade-promotions, coupons and other discounts. The Company routinely commits to one-time or on-going trade-promotion programs with customers, and consumer coupon programs that require the Company to estimate and accrue the expected costs of such programs. Programs include cooperative marketing programs, shelf price reductions, advantageous end-of-aisle or in-store displays of the Company’s products, graphics, introductory marketing funds for new products and other trade-promotion activities conducted by the customer. Coupons are recognized as a liability when distributed based upon expected consumer redemptions. The Company maintains liabilities at the end of each period for the estimated expenses incurred, but unpaid for these programs. Trade-promotion and coupon costs are recorded as a reduction of sales.
 
The Company provides an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its historical experience and a periodic review of its accounts receivable. Receivables were presented net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $5 at June 30, 2007 and 2006. The Company’s provision (recovery) for doubtful accounts was $2, zero, and $(2) in fiscal years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.
 
Cost of Products Sold
 
Cost of products sold represents the costs directly related to the manufacture and distribution of the Company’s products and primarily includes raw materials, packaging, contract packer fees, shipping and handling, warehousing, package design, and direct and indirect labor and operating costs for the Company’s manufacturing facilities including salary, benefit costs and incentive compensation.
 
Costs associated with developing and designing new packaging are expensed as incurred and include design, artwork, films, and labeling. Expenses for fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2006, and 2005 were $9, $11, and $13, respectively, of which $8, $11, and $12, were classified as cost of products sold, and the remainder was classified as selling and administrative expenses, respectively.

29

 

		
NOTE 1.  	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)	
 
Selling and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling and administrative expenses represent costs incurred by the Company in generating revenues and managing the business and include market research, commissions, and certain administrative expenses. Administrative expenses include salary, benefits, incentive compensation, professional fees and services, software and licensing fees, and other operating costs associated with the Company’s non-manufacturing, non-research and development staff, facilities and equipment.
 
Advertising and Research and Development Costs
 
The Company expenses advertising and research and development costs in the period incurred.
 
Income Taxes
 
The Company uses the asset and liability method to account for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement amounts and their respective tax bases. Management reviews the Company’s deferred tax assets to determine whether their value can be realized based upon available evidence. A valuation allowance is established when management believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in valuation allowances from period to period are included in the Company’s tax provision in the period of change. In addition to valuation allowances, the Company establishes accruals for certain tax contingencies when, despite the belief that the Company’s tax return positions are fully supported, the Company believes that certain positions are likely to be challenged and that the Company’s positions may not be fully sustained. The tax-contingency accruals are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, case law and emerging legislation. The Company’s tax-contingency accruals are reflected as a component of accrued liabilities.
 
A number of years may elapse before a particular matter, for which the Company has recognized an accrual, is audited and finally resolved. The number of years with open tax audits varies by jurisdiction. While it is often difficult to predict the final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular tax matter, the Company believes its tax-contingency accruals are adequate to address known tax contingencies. Favorable resolution of such matters could be recognized as a reduction to the Company’s effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable settlement of any particular issue could increase the effective tax rate. Any resolution of a tax issue may require the use of cash in the year of resolution.
 
In subsequent years, tax-contingency accruals will cease to be evaluated under the principles of SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies . Instead, uncertain tax positions will be evaluated under the principles of FIN 48. For additional information, refer to the information set forth in Note 1 under the caption “New Accounting Pronouncements” above.
 
U.S. income tax expense and foreign withholding taxes are provided on unremitted foreign earnings that are not indefinitely reinvested at the time the earnings are generated. Where foreign earnings are indefinitely reinvested, no provision for U.S. income or foreign withholding taxes is made. When circumstances change and the Company determines that some or all of the undistributed earnings will be remitted in the foreseeable future, the Company accrues an expense in the current period for U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes attributable to the anticipated remittance.
 
Foreign Currency Translation
 
Local currencies are the functional currencies for substantially all of the Company’s foreign operations. When the transactional currency is different than the functional currency, transaction gains and losses are included as a component of other (income) expense, net. Assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. Dollars using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet reporting date. Income and expenses are translated at the average monthly exchange rates during the year. Gains and losses on foreign currency translations

30

 

		
NOTE 1.  	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)	
 
are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Deferred taxes are not provided on cumulative translation adjustments where the Company expects earnings of a foreign subsidiary to be indefinitely reinvested. The income tax effect of currency translation adjustments related to foreign earnings from certain countries and joint ventures that are not considered indefinitely reinvested is recorded as a component of deferred taxes with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive net losses.
 
Net Earnings Per Share
 
Basic net earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding each period on an unrounded basis. Diluted net earnings per common share is computed by dividing net earnings by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period on an unrounded basis. Diluted net earnings per common share reflects the earnings dilution that would occur from the issuance of common shares related to in-the-money stock options, restricted stock and performance units.
 
Derivative Instruments
 
The Company’s use of derivative instruments, principally swap, futures, forward, and option contracts, is limited to non-trading purposes and is designed to manage exposure to changes in interest rates, foreign currencies and commodity prices. The Company’s contracts are hedges for transactions with notional balances and periods consistent with the related exposures and do not constitute investments independent of these exposures. Exposure to counterparty credit risk is considered low because these agreements have been entered into with creditworthy institutions.
 
Most interest rate swaps and commodity purchase and foreign-exchange contracts are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges of long-term debt, raw material purchase obligations or foreign currency denominated debt instruments, based on certain hedge criteria. The criteria used to determine if hedge accounting treatment is appropriate are: (a) the designation of the hedge to an underlying exposure, (b) whether overall risk is being reduced and, (c) whether there is sufficient correlation between the value of the derivative instrument and the underlying obligation. The changes in the fair value of derivatives are recorded as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet with an offset to net earnings or other comprehensive income, depending on whether, for accounting purposes, the derivative is designated and qualified as a hedge. For fair-value hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of the derivative and changes in the fair value of the item being hedged are recorded in earnings. For cash flow hedge transactions, changes in the fair value of derivatives are reported as a component of other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings when realized. The Company also has contracts not designated as hedges for accounting purposes and recognizes changes in the fair value of these contracts in other (income) expense, net.
 
The Company uses different methodologies, when necessary, to estimate the fair value of its derivative contracts. The estimated fair values of the majority of the Company’s contracts are based on quoted market prices, traded exchange market prices, or broker price quotations, and represent the estimated amounts that the Company would pay or receive to terminate the contracts.

NOTE 2.  	HENKEL TRANSACTIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS	
 
Share Exchange Agreement
 
On November 22, 2004, the Company completed the exchange of its ownership interest in a subsidiary for Henkel KGaA’s (Henkel) interest in Clorox common stock. Prior to the completion of the exchange, Henkel owned approximately 61.4 million shares, or about 29%, of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The parties agreed that the Company would provide exchange value equal to $46.25 per share of Company stock being acquired in the exchange. The subsidiary transferred to Henkel contained Clorox’s existing insecticides and Soft Scrub ® cleanser businesses (jointly, the Operating Businesses), its 20% interest in the Henkel Iberica, S.A. (Henkel Iberica) joint venture, and $2,095 in cash.

31

 

		
NOTE 2.  	HENKEL TRANSACTIONS AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS (Continued)	
 
Upon closing, the Company recognized a gain of $570 and reversed a total of $8 of deferred income taxes. The gain reflects an aggregate fair value of $745 for the exchanged Operating Businesses and Henkel Iberica, and was based on specified working capital balances that would exist at the closing date. As the specified working capital balances exceeded the actual balances at the closing date by $11, the Company was obligated to pay Henkel approximately $11 by the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2005. The fair value of the businesses was determined through arm’s-length negotiations supported by traditional valuation methodologies that included discounted cash flow calculations and sales and earnings multiples.
 
In addition, the Company paid $13 of transaction costs related to the share exchange, including $9 that was charged to the gain and $4 that was attributed to treasury shares.
 
The transaction was structured to qualify as a tax-free exchange under Section 355 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company initially funded the transaction with commercial paper borrowings and subsequently refinanced a portion of the commercial paper borrowings by issuing $1,650 in senior notes.
 
Discontinued Operations
 
The following table presents the net sales and earnings from the exchanged Operating Businesses related to the Henkel Share Exchange Agreement:

 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Net sales	 	$	16	 	 	$	87	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes	 	$	1	 	 	$	37	 	
Income tax expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	(8	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings from discontinued operations	 	$	1	 	 	$	29	 	

 
Brazil Business
 
In fiscal year 2003, the Company announced its intent to exit its business in Brazil, a reporting unit included in the International segment. The Company closed its offices in Brazil and sold nearly all of the remaining assets of this business, which were classified as a discontinued operation. On December 22, 2006, the Company sold certain assets remaining from its discontinued operation in Brazil. This transaction resulted in an income tax benefit of $5, which was recorded in discontinued operations during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. There were no sales or other significant financial results during fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 from the Brazil business.

NOTE 3.  	RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT	
 
Restructuring and asset impairment charges were $13, $1, and $36 in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
Information Technology Services Restructuring
 
During fiscal year 2007, the Company entered into an Information Technology Services (ITS) Agreement, further described in Note 17, and restructured certain Information Services (IS) activities. The Company incurred administrative expenses and restructuring costs of approximately $23 during its fiscal year ending June 30, 2007, primarily associated with transition and severance costs. In fiscal year 2007, costs of $14 were recorded in administrative expense and severance and other related costs of $9 were recorded as restructuring costs which are included as part of the Company’s Corporate segment. Total restructuring payments through June 30, 2007, were $9 and the total accrued restructuring liability as of June 30, 2007, was zero.
 
Other Supply Chain Restructuring and Other Costs
 
In fiscal year 2007, the Company recorded $4 of asset impairment costs, which are included as part of the Specialty Group operating segment.

32

 

		
NOTE 3.  	RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET IMPAIRMENT (Continued)	
 
During fiscal years 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded restructuring and asset impairment charges of $1 and $32 in conjunction with the Specialty Group operating segment’s Glad ® supply chain restructuring. The restructuring involved closing a manufacturing facility and distributing the remaining production between Glad ® ’s North American plants and third-party suppliers to optimize available capacity and operating costs. The charges in fiscal year 2005 included asset impairment charges of $26, employee severance of $5, and lease termination fees of $1. The Company also recorded incremental operating costs of $7 associated primarily with equipment and inventory transfer charges.
 
In fiscal year 2005, the Company also recorded asset impairment charges and severance costs of $4 related to manufacturing operations in the International segment. The fair values of all impaired assets were determined based on the estimated selling values of assets in similar conditions.
 
Restructuring, asset impairment charges and restructuring liabilities for other supply chain restructuring and other costs for fiscal years 2007, 2006, 2005 were as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Restructuring:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Severance	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	6	 	
Plant closure and other	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	1	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total restructuring	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	7	 	
Asset impairment	 	 	4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	29	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total restructuring and asset impairment expense	 	$	4	 	 	$	1	 	 	$	36	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accrued restructuring at beginning of year	 	$	2	 	 	$	2	 	 	$	3	 	
Restructuring expense	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	7	 	
Payments	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(1	)	 	 	(8	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accrued restructuring at end of year	 	$	—	 	 	$	2	 	 	$	2	 	

 
Future Supply Chain Restructuring and Asset Impairment
 
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 and the first quarter of 2008, the Board of Directors approved initiatives to simplify the Company’s supply chain (Supply Chain restructuring) and terminate certain new venture investments in line with the Company’s Centennial Strategy. This Supply Chain restructuring involves closing certain domestic and international manufacturing facilities and redistributing production between the remaining facilities and third-party producers to optimize available capacity and reduce operating costs. As a result of this initiative, a number of positions will be eliminated.
 
The Company anticipates this Supply Chain restructuring to be completed in fiscal year 2010. The total cost of implementing this Supply Chain restructuring is estimated to be between $32 and $39, of which $28 to $34 is expected to be incurred in fiscal year 2008. The Company expects $23 to $28 of these charges will be in the Household Group — North America, of which $14 to $18 are estimated to be recognized as additional cost of goods sold charges and $9 to $10 are estimated to be severance charges. The remaining estimated charges will be spread across the Company’s other operating segments and the Corporate segment, and are expected to be classified as cost of goods sold, severance and asset impairment. The projected annual savings at the completion of this restructuring is expected to be approximately $23 to $24. No significant charges were incurred during fiscal year 2007.
 
In addition, the Company expects to incur charges related to the write-down of certain new venture investments. The Company anticipates the initiative to be completed in fiscal year 2008 with total costs in the range of $21 to $24. During fiscal year 2008, the Company anticipates asset impairment costs of $18 to $21 in the Specialty Group segment. The remaining estimated asset impairment costs will be spread across the Household Group — North America and Corporate segments. No charges were incurred during fiscal year 2007.

33

 

		
NOTE 4.  	BUSINESSES ACQUIRED	
 
The Company purchased bleach businesses in Canada, effective December 29, 2006, and in certain Latin American countries, effective February 28, 2007, for an aggregate price of $123, with the objective of expanding its global bleach business.
 
In connection with the purchases, the Company acquired brand trademarks in Canada and Latin America, license agreements in Latin America, and manufacturing facilities in Canada and Venezuela. Employees at the manufacturing facilities transferred to the Company. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007, the Company announced plans to close the manufacturing facility in Canada by December 2007. Net assets, acquired at fair value, included inventory of $1, other assets of $13, property, plant and equipment of $8, trademarks of $12 and licenses of $1. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired of approximately $53 and $35 was recorded as goodwill in the Household Group — North America and International segments, respectively. The goodwill resulting from the purchase is primarily attributable to expected growth rates and profitability of the acquired businesses, expected synergies with the Company’s existing operations and access to new markets. The trademarks in Canada will be amortized over a period of 5 years and the licenses in the Latin American countries will be amortized over a period of 3 years. Additional changes to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed may be recorded as the Company receives further information in fiscal year 2008.
 
The transactions were structured as all cash acquisitions and operating results of the acquired businesses are included in the consolidated net earnings of the Household Group — North America and International segments for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, from their respective dates of acquisition. Pro forma results of the Company, assuming the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each period presented, would not be materially different from the results reported.

NOTE 5.  	INVENTORIES, NET	
 
Inventories, net at June 30 were comprised of the following:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Finished goods	 	$	251	 	 	$	224	 	
Raw materials and packaging	 	 	81	 	 	 	81	 	
Work in process	 	 	4	 	 	 	5	 	
LIFO allowances	 	 	(18	)	 	 	(14	)	
Allowances for obsolescence	 	 	(9	)	 	 	(4	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	309	 	 	$	292	 	

 
The last-in, first-out (LIFO) method was used to value approximately 37% of inventories at June 30, 2007, and 2006. The carrying values for all other inventories, including inventories of all international businesses, are determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. If the carrying value of LIFO inventories had been determined using the FIFO method, inventory amounts would have increased by approximately $18 and $14 at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The effect on earnings of the liquidation of any LIFO layers was not material for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005.
 
Changes in the allowance for inventory obsolescence were as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Beginning of year	 	$	(4	)	 	$	(6	)	 	$	(4	)	
Obsolescence provision	 	 	(10	)	 	 	(6	)	 	 	(16	)	
Inventory write-offs	 	 	5	 	 	 	8	 	 	 	14	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
End of year	 	$	(9	)	 	$	(4	)	 	$	(6	)	

34

 

		
NOTE 6.  	PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET	
 
The components of property, plant and equipment, net at June 30 were as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Land and improvements	 	$	118	 	 	$	104	 	
Buildings	 	 	521	 	 	 	511	 	
Machinery and equipment	 	 	1,357	 	 	 	1,300	 	
Computer equipment	 	 	91	 	 	 	129	 	
Capitalized software costs	 	 	273	 	 	 	262	 	
Construction in progress	 	 	68	 	 	 	84	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	2,428	 	 	 	2,390	 	
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization	 	 	(1,452	)	 	 	(1,386	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net balance	 	$	976	 	 	$	1,004	 	

 
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment was $175 in fiscal year 2007 and $170 in fiscal years 2006 and 2005.

NOTE 7.  	GOODWILL, TRADEMARKS AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS	
 
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, by operating segment and corporate segment are summarized below.

 	 	Household	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Group -	 	 	Specialty	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	North America	 	 	Group	 	 	International	 	 	Corporate	 	 	Total	 	
 		
Balance at June 30, 2005	 	$	426	 	 	$	68	 	 	$	180	 	 	$	69	 	 	$	743	 	
Segment transfers	 	 	14	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	9	 	 	 	(23	)	 	 	—	 	
Translation adjustments and other	 	 	5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance at June 30, 2006	 	 	445	 	 	 	68	 	 	 	185	 	 	 	46	 	 	 	744	 	
Segment transfers	 	 	19	 	 	 	11	 	 	 	16	 	 	 	(46	)	 	 	—	 	
Acquisitions	 	 	53	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	35	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	88	 	
Translation adjustments and other	 	 	7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	16	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	23	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Balance at June 30, 2007	 	$	524	 	 	$	79	 	 	$	252	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	855	 	

 
Changes in trademarks and other intangible assets for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, are summarized below. The intangible assets subject to amortization are reported net of accumulated amortization of $190 and $177 at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, of which $60 and $49, respectively, related to technology. The estimated amortization expense for these intangible assets is $14 for fiscal year 2008, $13 for each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, $12 for fiscal year 2011 and $11 for fiscal year 2012. The weighted-average amortization period for trademarks and other intangible assets subject to amortization acquired in fiscal year 2007 is 6 years.

35

 

		
NOTE 7.  	GOODWILL, TRADEMARKS AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)	

 	 	Trademarks and Other Intangible Assets	 	
 	 	Subject to Amortization	 	 	Not Subject to	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Technology	 	 	Other	 	 	Sub-Total	 	 	Amortization	 	 	Total	 	
 		
Net balance at June 30, 2005	 	$	87	 	 	$	20	 	 	$	107	 	 	$	492	 	 	$	599	 	
Acquisitions	 	 	13	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	13	 	 	 	8	 	 	 	21	 	
Translation adjustments and other	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(3	)	 	 	(3	)	
Amortization	 	 	(11	)	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(13	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(13	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net balance at June 30, 2006	 	 	89	 	 	 	18	 	 	 	107	 	 	 	497	 	 	 	604	 	
Acquisitions	 	 	—	 	 	 	3	 	 	 	3	 	 	 	11	 	 	 	14	 	
Translation adjustments and other	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	7	 	 	 	8	 	
Amortization	 	 	(11	)	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(13	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(13	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net balance at June 30, 2007	 	$	78	 	 	$	20	 	 	$	98	 	 	$	515	 	 	$	613	 	

 
The Company performed its annual review of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets in the third fiscal quarter and no instances of impairment were identified. The Company will continue to test annually for impairment in the third fiscal quarter unless there are indications during an interim period that intangible assets may have become impaired.
 
NOTE 8.  OTHER ASSETS
 
Other assets were comprised of the following at June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Equity investments	 	$	48	 	 	$	45	 	
Pension benefit assets	 	 	39	 	 	 	106	 	
Investment in insurance contracts	 	 	38	 	 	 	39	 	
Investment in low-income housing partnerships	 	 	20	 	 	 	23	 	
Non-qualified retirement plan assets	 	 	13	 	 	 	15	 	
Deferred tax assets	 	 	14	 	 	 	9	 	
Other	 	 	18	 	 	 	20	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	190	 	 	$	257	 	

 
Pension Benefit Assets
 
The Company reported a net pension asset at June 30, 2007 and 2006 for its domestic plan. As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 158, the Company reclassified $67 of actuarial losses and prior service benefits to accumulated other comprehensive net losses. Refer to Note 20 for further discussion.
 
Equity Investments
 
The Company holds various equity investments in a number of consumer products businesses, most of which operate outside the United States. The Company has no ongoing capital commitments, loan requirements, guarantees or any other types of arrangements under the terms of its agreements that would require any future cash contributions or disbursements arising out of a variable interest entity or equity investment, except for the investment in low-income housing partnerships described in the following paragraph.
36

 

NOTE 8.  OTHER ASSETS (Continued)
 
Investment in Low-Income Housing Partnerships
 
The Company owns, directly or indirectly, limited partnership interests of up to 99% in 52 low-income housing partnerships, which are accounted for on the equity basis. The purpose of the partnerships is to develop and operate low-income housing rental properties. The general partners, who typically hold 1% of the partnership interests, are third parties unrelated to the Company and its affiliates, and are responsible for controlling and managing the business and financial operations of the partnerships. The partnerships provide the Company with low-income housing tax credits, which are accounted for in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 94-1, Accounting for Tax Benefits Resulting from Investments in Affordable Housing Projects . Tax benefits, net of equity in the losses of the low-income housing partnerships, were $3, $4, and $(4) in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s estimated future capital requirements for the partnerships are approximately $2, $1, zero, $1 and zero in fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. As a limited partner, the Company is not responsible for any of the liabilities and obligations of the partnerships nor do the partnerships or their creditors have any recourse to the Company other than for the capital requirements. Recovery of the Company’s investments in the partnerships is accomplished through the utilization of low-income housing tax credits, the tax benefits of partnership losses and proceeds from the disposition of rental properties. The risk of these tax credits being unavailable to the Company is considered very low. For the combined group of low-income housing partnerships in which the Company invests, the aggregate underlying assets and liabilities were approximately $375 and $456, respectively, at June 30, 2007. The Company does not consolidate the investment in low-income housing partnerships.
 
Investment in Insurance Contracts
 
The Company invests in life insurance policies and records the cash surrender value of the contracts, net of any policy loans, at fair value. Any change in the cash surrender value is reflected in other (income) expense, net.
 
During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, the Company received $41 of proceeds from the termination of one of its investments in insurance contracts. The Company used a portion of these proceeds to repay related long-term debt borrowings of $29, which were previously netted against the investments.
 
Nonqualified Retirement Plan Assets
 
The majority of the nonqualified retirement plan assets at June 30, 2007, are held in a trust-owned life insurance policy, whose investment assets are a separately-managed equity and debt portfolio administered by an insurance company. The assets held under this insurance policy are recorded at estimated fair value with changes in estimated value recorded in other (income) expense, net.

NOTE 9.  	ACCRUED LIABILITIES	
 
Accrued liabilities at June 30 consisted of the following:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Compensation and employee benefit costs	 	$	120	 	 	$	100	 	
Taxes	 	 	116	 	 	 	144	 	
Trade and sales promotion	 	 	100	 	 	 	77	 	
Dividends	 	 	61	 	 	 	44	 	
Interest	 	 	33	 	 	 	37	 	
Venture agreement royalty (Note 12)	 	 	9	 	 	 	10	 	
Other	 	 	68	 	 	 	62	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	507	 	 	$	474	 	

37

 

		
NOTE 10.  	DEBT	
 
Notes and loans payable, which mature in less than one year, included the following at June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Commercial paper	 	$	58	 	 	$	126	 	
Foreign borrowings	 	 	16	 	 	 	30	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	74	 	 	$	156	 	

 
The weighted average interest rate for notes and loans payable was 5.72%, 4.31% and 2.37% for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The carrying value of notes and loans payable at June 30, 2007 and 2006, approximated the fair value of such debt.
 
Long-term debt at June 30 included the following:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Senior unsecured notes and debentures:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Floating rate, $500 due December 2007	 	$	500	 	 	$	500	 	
4.20%, $575 due January 2010, including premiums	 	 	576	 	 	 	577	 	
5.00%, $575 due January 2015	 	 	575	 	 	 	575	 	
6.125%, $300 due February 2011, including premiums	 	 	311	 	 	 	314	 	
7.25%, $150 due March 2007	 	 	—	 	 	 	150	 	
Other	 	 	—	 	 	 	2	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	 	1,962	 	 	 	2,118	 	
Less: Current maturities	 	 	(500	)	 	 	(152	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Long-term debt	 	$	1,462	 	 	$	1,966	 	

 
The weighted average interest rate on long-term debt, including the effect of interest rate swaps, was 5.11%, 4.88% and 4.72% for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The estimated fair value of long-term debt, including current maturities, was $1,910 and $2,043 at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
 
The floating-rate senior notes incur interest at a rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 0.125%, reset quarterly. The interest rate at June 30, 2007, for the floating-rate senior notes was 5.49%.
 
Credit facilities at June 30 were as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Revolving credit line	 	$	1,300	 	 	$	1,300	 	
Foreign and other credit lines	 	 	95	 	 	 	49	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	1,395	 	 	$	1,349	 	

 
At June 30, 2007, there were no borrowings under the $1,300 revolving credit agreement, which is available for general corporate purposes and to support additional commercial paper issuances. Of the $1,300 revolving credit agreement, $165 expires in December 2009, and the remainder expires in December 2010. In addition, at June 30, 2007, the Company had $95 foreign working capital credit lines and other facilities, of which $79 was available for borrowing.
 
Debt maturities at June 30, 2007, are $500, $575, $300 and $575 in fiscal years 2008, 2010, 2011 and thereafter, respectively. The Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants and limitations at June 30, 2007.

38

 

		
NOTE 11.  	FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS	
 
The Company’s derivative financial instruments were recorded at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets as assets at June 30 as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Other current assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commodity purchase contracts	 	$	6	 	 	$	11	 	
Other assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commodity purchase contracts	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	
Other current liabilities:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Commodity purchase contracts	 	 	1	 	 	 	—	 	
Foreign exchange contracts	 	 	2	 	 	 	—	 	

The Company uses commodity futures, swap, and option contracts to fix the price of a portion of its raw material requirements. Contract maturities, which extend to fiscal year 2008, are matched to the length of the raw material purchase contracts. Realized contract gains and losses are reflected as adjustments to the cost of the raw materials. The estimated amount of existing pretax net gains for commodity contracts in accumulated other comprehensive net income that is expected to be reclassified into net earnings during the year ending June 30, 2008, is $5. All of the Company’s instruments are accorded hedge accounting treatment and are considered effective.
 
The Company also enters into certain foreign-currency related derivative contracts with no specific hedge designations. These contracts, which have been entered into to manage a portion of the Company’s foreign exchange risk, are accounted for by adjusting the carrying amount of the contracts to market value and recognizing any gain or loss in other (income) expense, net.
 
In fiscal year 2004, the Company discontinued hedge accounting treatment for its resin commodity contract, as the contract no longer met the accounting requirements for a cash flow hedge. This contract expired in December 2006. This contract was used as an economic hedge of resin prices and changes in the fair value of this contract was recorded to other (income) expense, net. The pretax effect on net earnings from this contract was a loss of $2 in fiscal year 2007 and a gain of $2 in each of the fiscal years 2006 and 2005.
 
The notional and estimated fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments are summarized below at June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 	 	Notional	 	 	Fair Value	 	 	Notional	 	 	Fair Value	 	
 		
Derivative instruments	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Foreign exchange contracts	 	$	38	 	 	$	(2	)	 	$	47	 	 	$	—	 	
Commodity purchase contracts	 	 	85	 	 	 	5	 	 	 	84	 	 	 	12	 	
Fair value contracts	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	21	 	 	 	—	 	

The carrying values of cash, short-term investments, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate their fair values at June 30, 2007 and 2006, due to the short maturity and nature of those balances. See Note 10 for fair values of notes and loans payable and long-term debt.

39

 

		
NOTE 12.  	OTHER LIABILITIES	
 
Other liabilities consisted of the following at June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Venture agreement net terminal obligation	 	$	263	 	 	$	261	 	
Retirement healthcare benefits	 	 	65	 	 	 	83	 	
Nonqualified pension plans	 	 	54	 	 	 	49	 	
Nonqualified deferred compensation plans	 	 	49	 	 	 	50	 	
Environmental remediation	 	 	23	 	 	 	27	 	
Long-term disability post employment obligation	 	 	23	 	 	 	24	 	
Other	 	 	39	 	 	 	53	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	516	 	 	$	547	 	

 
Venture Agreement
 
In January 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) by which a venture was formed related to the Company’s Glad ® plastic bags, wraps and containers business. P&G contributed production and research and development equipment, licenses to use a range of current and future trademarks, and other proprietary technologies to the Company in exchange for an interest in the profits and losses, and cash flows, as contractually defined, of the Glad ® business. P&G is also providing and being reimbursed for research and development support to the Glad ® business for the first ten years of the venture, subject to renewal options. The production and research and development equipment is being depreciated on a straight-line basis over useful lives ranging from two to ten years and intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over a twelve-year period. The Company maintains a net terminal obligation liability, which reflects the contractual requirement to repurchase P&G’s interest at the termination of the agreement.
 
As of June 30, 2007 and 2006, P&G has a 20% interest in the venture, which is the maximum investment P&G is allowed under the venture agreement. The Company pays a royalty to P&G for its interest in the profits, losses and cash flows, as contractually defined, of the Glad ® business.
 
The agreement has a 20 year term, with a 10 year renewal option and can be terminated under certain circumstances, including at P&G’s option upon a change in control of the Company, or, at either party’s option, upon the sale of the Glad ® business by the Company. Upon termination of the agreement, the Company will purchase P&G’s interest for cash at fair value as established by pre-determined valuation procedures. Following termination, the Glad ® business will retain the exclusive intellectual property licenses contributed by P&G for the licensed products marketed.

NOTE 13.  	OTHER CONTINGENCIES	
 
The Company is involved in certain environmental matters, including Superfund and other response actions at various locations. The Company has a recorded liability of $23 and $27 at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, for its share of the related aggregate future remediation cost. One matter in Dickinson County, Michigan, for which the Company is jointly and severally liable, accounts for a substantial majority of the recorded liability at both June 30, 2007 and 2006. The Company is subject to a cost-sharing arrangement with another party for this matter, under which the Company has agreed to be liable for 24.3% of the aggregate remediation and associated costs, other than legal fees, as the Company and the other party are each responsible for their own such fees. The other party in this matter reported a substantial net loss for calendar year 2006. If the other party with whom Clorox shares joint and several liability is unable to pay its share of the response and remediation obligations, Clorox would likely be responsible for such obligations. In October 2004, the Company and the other party agreed to a consent judgment with the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, which sets forth certain remediation goals and monitoring activities. Based on the current status of this matter, and with the assistance of environmental consultants, the Company maintains an undiscounted liability representing its best estimate of its share of costs associated with the capital expenditures, maintenance and other costs to be incurred over an estimated 30-year remediation period. The most significant components of the liability relate to the estimated costs associated with the remediation of

40

 

		
NOTE 13.  	OTHER CONTINGENCIES (Continued)	
 
groundwater contamination and excess levels of subterranean methane deposits. Currently, the Company cannot accurately predict the timing of the payments that will likely be made under this estimated obligation. In addition, the Company’s estimated loss exposure is sensitive to a variety of uncertain factors, including the efficacy of remediation efforts, changes in remediation requirements and the timing, varying costs and alternative clean-up technologies that may become available in the future. Although it is possible that the Company’s exposure may exceed the amount recorded, any amount of such additional exposures, or range of exposures, is not estimable at this time.
 
On August 4, 2006, a derivative action purportedly on behalf of the Company was filed in the Superior Court of California, Alameda County, against certain current and former directors and officers of the Company. Specifically, the plaintiff alleges, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties and waste of corporate assets. These allegations relate to the non-cash compensation expense the Company recorded during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, following a review of its stock option practices. The complaint demands, among other forms of relief, judgment in the form of monetary damages sustained by the Company as a result of such practices. On September 1, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the case. On November 3, 2006, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint naming additional defendants and asserting additional claims including allegations of violations of Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. On December 1, 2006, the Company removed the case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On December 22, 2006, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On April 27, 2007, the parties entered into a stipulation whereby they agreed, subject to court approval, that the amended complaint will be dismissed and that the plaintiff will have until May 30, 2007, to demand that the Board of Directors pursue the claims in the amended complaint on behalf of the Company. The plaintiff has sent the Board a demand letter and the Board is currently reviewing this matter. The plaintiff will have 30 days from the date of the Board’s response to this demand letter in which to file a second amended complaint challenging the Board’s decision.
 
While there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of this action, the Company does not believe that its resolution will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flow. Since the Company believes that the likelihood of sustaining a material loss is remote, the Company has not accrued a liability at June 30, 2007.
 
The Company is also subject to various other lawsuits and claims relating to issues such as contract disputes, product liability, patents and trademarks, advertising, employee and other matters. Although the results of claims and litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these matters, to the extent not previously provided for, will not have a material adverse effect, individually or in the aggregate, on the Company’s consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.

NOTE 14.  	STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)	
 
The Company has two share repurchase programs, consisting of an open-market program, which has a total authorization of $750, and a program to offset the impact of share dilution related to share-based awards (evergreen program), which has no authorization limit.
 
The open-market program was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2007, and it replaced the July 2002 and July 2003 share repurchase open-market programs.
 
There were no shares repurchased under the open-market program in fiscal year 2007 and 2006. Share repurchases under the evergreen program were $155 (2.4 million shares) in fiscal year 2007 and $135 (2.4 million shares) in fiscal year 2006.
 
During fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company declared dividends per share of $1.31, $1.15, and $1.11, respectively. During fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company paid dividends per share of $1.20, $1.14, and $1.10, respectively.

41

 

		
NOTE 14.  	STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Continued)	
 
Accumulated other comprehensive net losses at June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005, included the following net-of-tax (losses) gains:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Currency translation	 	$	(168	)	 	$	(215	)	 	$	(217	)	
Derivatives	 	 	3	 	 	 	6	 	 	 	5	 	
Minimum pension liabilities	 	 	—	 	 	 	(6	)	 	 	(124	)	
Unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service benefit, net	 	 	(44	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	(209	)	 	$	(215	)	 	$	(336	)	

 
For fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company recorded increases (decreases) to deferred tax assets of $23, $(71), and $72, respectively, which were related to its unrecognized components of employee benefit plans adjustments and were reflected as components of total comprehensive income.
 
On November 14, 2006, the Company retired 91 million shares of its treasury stock. These shares are now authorized but unissued. In accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 6, Status of Accounting Research Bulletin , the treasury stock retirement resulted in a reduction of the following on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet: treasury stock by $4,137, common stock by $91 and retained earnings by $4,046. There was no effect on the Company’s overall equity position as a result of the retirement.
 
NOTE 15.  EARNINGS PER SHARE
 
A reconciliation of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (in thousands) used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows for the fiscal years ended June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Basic	 	 	151,445	 	 	 	150,545	 	 	 	176,586	 	
Stock options and other	 	 	2,490	 	 	 	2,456	 	 	 	2,590	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted	 	 	153,935	 	 	 	153,001	 	 	 	179,176	 	

 
Stock options (in thousands) not included in the computation of diluted net earnings per common share because the exercise price of the stock options was greater than the average market price of the common shares and therefore the effect would be antidilutive is as follows for the fiscal years ended June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Stock options	 	 	57	 	 	 	439	 	 	 	502	 	

 
		
NOTE 16.  	SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS	
 
In November 2005, the Company’s stockholders approved the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (2005 Plan). The 2005 Plan permits the Company to grant various nonqualified, share-based compensation awards, including stock options, restricted stock, performance units, deferred stock units, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance shares and other stock-based awards. As a result of the adoption of the 2005 Plan, no further awards have been or will be granted from any prior plans, including the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan and the 1993 Directors’ Stock Option Plan. The Company is authorized to grant up to seven million common shares under the 2005 Plan, of which five million common shares were previously available under prior plans. At June 30, 2007, six million common shares are available for grant under the 2005 Plan.

42

 

		
NOTE 16.  	SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)	
 
Following the adoption of SFAS 123-R, and excluding the $25 pretax cumulative historical stock option charge ($16 after-tax) discussed below, the compensation cost and related income tax benefit recognized in the Company’s fiscal years 2007 and 2006 consolidated financial statements for share-based compensation plans were classified as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Costs of products sold	 	$	7	 	 	$	5	 	
Selling and administrative expenses	 	 	38	 	 	 	45	 	
Research and development costs	 	 	4	 	 	 	2	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total compensation cost	 	$	49	 	 	$	52	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Related income tax benefit	 	$	19	 	 	$	20	 	

 
Total compensation expense related to the Company’s restricted stock and performance units programs prior to the adoption of SFAS 123-R was $6 and $5, respectively, and the total related income tax benefit for each of the programs was $2 for the fiscal year 2005.
 
Cash received during fiscal year 2007 from stock options exercised under all share-based payment arrangements was $103. The Company issues shares for share-based compensation plans from treasury stock. The Company repurchases shares under its program to offset the estimated impact of share dilution related to share-based awards. In fiscal year ended June 30, 2007, the Company repurchased 2.4 million shares at a total cost of $155. The Company expects to repurchase approximately 3 million shares in fiscal year 2008 to offset the impact of share dilution related to share-based awards.
 
Details regarding the valuation and accounting for stock options, restricted stock awards, performance units and deferred stock units for nonemployee directors follow.
 
Stock Options
 
The fair value of each stock option award granted during fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model and assumptions noted in the following table:

 	 	2007	 	2006	 	2005	
 		
Expected life	 	5 years	 	5 years	 	4 to 6 years	
Expected volatility	 	22.1% to 24.1%	 	24.2% to 28.0%	 	29.2%	
Risk-free interest rate	 	4.6% to 4.7%	 	3.7% to 4.9%	 	3.1% to 5.4%	
Dividend yield	 	1.9% to 2.0%	 	1.8% to 2.1%	 	2.1%	

The expected life of the stock options is based on observed historical exercise patterns. Groups of employees having similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123-R, the Company estimates stock option forfeitures based on historical data for each separate employee grouping, and adjusts the rate to expected forfeitures periodically. The adjustment of the forfeiture rate will result in a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period the forfeiture estimate is changed. The expected volatility is based on implied volatility from publicly traded options on the Company’s stock at the date of grant, historical implied volatility of the Company’s publicly traded options and other factors. The risk-free interest rate is based on the implied yield on a U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issue with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the option. The dividend yield is based on the projected annual dividend payment per share, divided by the stock price at the date of grant.
 
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method. Pro forma disclosures of net earnings, basic and diluted earnings per common share reflecting the Company’s financial results if compensation expense for the various stock option plans had been determined based upon fair values at the grant date are presented in Note 1.

43

 

		
NOTE 16.  	SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)	
 
Details of the Company’s stock option plan at June 30 are summarized below:

 	 	 	 	 	Weighted-	 	 	Average	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	Average	 	 	Remaining	 	 	Aggregate	 	
 	 	Number of	 	 	Exercise	 	 	Contractual	 	 	Intrinsic	 	
 	 	Shares	 	 	Price	 	 	Life	 	 	Value	 	
 	 	(In thousands)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 		
Outstanding at June 30, 2006	 	 	10,490	 	 	$	45	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Granted	 	 	1,301	 	 	 	62	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Exercised	 	 	(2,359	)	 	 	43	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cancelled	 	 	(473	)	 	 	52	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Outstanding at June 30, 2007	 	 	8,959	 	 	 	47	 	 	 	6 years	 	 	$	133	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Options vested and exercisable at:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
June 30, 2007	 	 	5,894	 	 	 	42	 	 	 	5 years	 	 	 	117	 	

The weighted-average fair value per share of each option granted during fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, estimated at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, was $14.96, $14.75 and $14.33, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $49, $53 and $60, respectively.
 
Results for the fourth quarter and fiscal year 2006 include a pretax cumulative charge of $25 ($16 after-tax or $0.11 per diluted share), resulting from non-cash charges associated with historical stock option compensation expense relating to prior periods dating back to the third quarter of fiscal 1996. The Company identified the additional stock option compensation expense in a voluntary comprehensive review of its stock-option practices that was overseen by the Audit Committee of Clorox’s Board of Directors with the assistance of outside counsel. The Company’s voluntary review identified no evidence of fraud or intentional deviation from U.S. GAAP.
 
The pretax charge for non-cash compensation expense includes $15 in equity compensation expense related to the determination of the appropriate measurement date for certain stock option grants, of which $2 relates to certain stock options granted to officers prior to December 2001 and $13 relates to certain stock options granted to non-officer employees prior to October 2004. With respect to substantially all of these stock option grants, the Company identified the measurement date as the date that resulted in the lowest market price over a two-week period rather than the end of the two-week period, as required. Consequently, compensation expense was recorded for certain grants identified as having intrinsic value as of the appropriate measurement date.
 
The remaining $10 in pretax charges results primarily from the requirement to use variable accounting with respect to certain options granted to officers due to existence of documented approval of the options within six months of the repurchase in 2001 of stock options from the same officers. Although the intent was for the options to have been granted more than six months before the repurchase, there is insufficient documentation to demonstrate that final approval of the option grants was made at least six months prior to the repurchase.
 
Stock option awards outstanding as of June 30, 2007, have generally been granted at prices that are either equal to or above the market value of the stock on the date of grant. As noted above, certain historical stock options were granted prior to fiscal year 2006 at prices below market value. Stock options outstanding as of June 30, 2007, generally vest over four years and expire no later than ten years after the grant date. Effective July 1, 2005, the Company generally recognizes compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. At June 30, 2007, there was $25 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of three years, subject to forfeitures.
 
Restricted Stock Awards
 
In accordance with SFAS No. 123-R, the fair value of restricted stock awards is estimated on the date of grant based on the market price of the stock and is amortized to compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the related vesting periods, which are generally three to four years. The total number of restricted stock awards expected to vest

44

 

		
NOTE 16.  	SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)	
 
is adjusted by estimated forfeiture rates. At June 30, 2007, there was $10 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of two years. The unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards was recorded as unearned compensation in stockholders’ deficit at June 30, 2005. As part of the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards granted prior to July 1, 2005, was included as a component of additional paid-in capital. The total fair value of the shares that vested in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005 was $11, $5 and $5, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of awards granted was $61.89, $57.23, and $54.89 per share for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
A summary of the status of the Company’s restricted stock awards at June 30 is presented below:

 	 	 	 	 	Weighted-Average	 	
 	 	Number of	 	 	Grant-Date Fair Value	 	
 	 	Shares	 	 	per Share	 	
 	 	(In thousands)	 	 	 	 	
 		
Restricted stock awards at June 30, 2006	 	 	529	 	 	$	47	 	
Granted	 	 	128	 	 	 	62	 	
Vested	 	 	(173	)	 	 	43	 	
Forfeited	 	 	(23	)	 	 	53	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Restricted stock awards at June 30, 2007	 	 	461	 	 	 	53	 	

 
Performance Units
 
The Company’s performance unit grants subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R provide for the issuance of common stock to certain managerial staff and executive management if the Company achieves specified return on invested capital performance targets. The performance unit grants vest after three years. All performance unit grants receive dividend distributions during their vesting periods. The fair value of each grant issued is estimated on the date of grant based on the current market price of the stock. The total amount of compensation expense recognized reflects estimated forfeiture rates, and the initial assumption that performance goals will be achieved. Compensation expense is adjusted quarterly based on management’s assessment of the probability that performance goals will be achieved. If such goals are not met or it is determined that achievement of performance goals is not probable, any previously recognized compensation expense is reversed.
 
The number of shares issued will be dependent upon vesting and the achievement of specified performance targets. At June 30, 2007, there was $24 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested performance unit grants issued after the adoption of SFAS 123-R, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average performance period of two years. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of awards granted was $61.47, $57.00 and $53.45 per share for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
 
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company granted performance units to certain members of management that provided for the issuance of common stock if the Company’s total shareholder return over a period of time met specified performance goals based on comparisons with the performance of a selected peer group of companies. In fiscal year 2007, after determining it was likely that certain performance goals would be met, the Company recorded the fiscal year 2004 performance unit grants, which are scheduled to vest in September 2007 if performance goals are met. The unrecognized expense for the performance unit grants scheduled to vest in September 2007 is less than $1.

45

 

		
NOTE 16.  	SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS (Continued)	
 
A summary of the status of the Company’s performance unit awards at June 30 is presented below:

 	 	 	 	 	Weighted-Average	 	
 	 	Number of	 	 	Grant-Date Fair Value	 	
 	 	Shares	 	 	per Share	 	
 	 	(In thousands)	 	 	 	 	
 		
Performance unit awards at June 30, 2006	 	 	906	 	 	$	51	 	
Granted	 	 	449	 	 	 	61	 	
Vested and distributed	 	 	(45	)	 	 	33	 	
Forfeited	 	 	(57	)	 	 	58	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Performance unit awards at June 30, 2007	 	 	1,253	 	 	 	55	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Performance units vested and deferred at June 30, 2007	 	 	246	 	 	 	40	 	

 
The nonvested performance units outstanding at June 30, 2007 and 2006, were 1,006,851 and 738,770, respectively, and the weighted average grant date fair value was $58.46 and $54.46 per share, respectively. Total shares vested during fiscal year 2007 were 120,140, which had a weighted average grant date fair value per share of $45.33. The total fair value of shares vested was $8, $6, and zero during fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Upon vesting, the recipients of the grants either receive the distribution as shares or, if previously elected by the recipient, as deferred stock. During fiscal years 2007 and 2006, $1 and $3 of the vested awards were paid by the issuance of shares. At June 30, 2007, $5 of fiscal year 2007 deferred stock and $5 of fiscal year 2006 deferred stock are included in additional paid-in capital.
 
Deferred Stock Units for Nonemployee Directors
 
Nonemployee directors receive annual grants of deferred stock units under the Company’s director compensation program and can elect to receive all or a portion of their annual retainers and fees in the form of deferred stock units. The deferred stock units vest immediately, receive dividend distributions, which are reinvested as deferred stock units, and are recognized at their fair value on the date of grant. Each deferred stock unit represents the right to receive one share of the Company’s common stock following the termination of a director’s service.
 
During fiscal year 2007, the Company granted 38,393 deferred stock units, reinvested dividends of 2,065 units and distributed 26,190 shares, which had a weighted-average fair value on grant date of $63.36, $64.39 and $43.48 per share, respectively. As of June 30, 2007, 113,954 units were outstanding, which had a weighted-average fair value on grant date of $53.18 per share.

NOTE 17.  	LEASES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS	
 
In October 2006, the Company entered into an ITS Agreement with Hewlett-Packard (HP), a third-party service provider. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the ITS Agreement, HP is providing certain information technology and related services as well as information technology equipment through an operating lease. The services and operating lease began in March 2007 and will continue through October 2013. The estimated future minimum rental payments, included in the table below, are $17 and the contractual obligations, included in purchase obligations, are $224. Estimates are based on an annual service fee that will be adjusted periodically based upon updates to services and equipment provided. During fiscal year 2007, the Company incurred operating costs of $11 under the agreement.
 
In addition to the information technology equipment lease, the Company also leases transportation equipment, and various manufacturing, warehousing, and office facilities. The Company’s leases are classified as operating leases and the Company’s existing contracts will expire by 2019. The Company expects that in the normal course of

46

 

		
NOTE 17.  	LEASES AND OTHER COMMITMENTS (Continued)	
 
business, existing contracts will be renewed or replaced by other leases. The following is a schedule of future minimum rental payments required under the Company’s existing non-cancelable lease agreements:

 	 	Future Minimum	 	
Fiscal Year	 	Rental Payments	 	
 		
2008	 	$	26	 	
2009	 	 	23	 	
2010	 	 	21	 	
2011	 	 	16	 	
2012	 	 	14	 	
Thereafter	 	 	41	 	
 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	141	 	

 
Rental expense for all operating leases was $53, $50, and $46 in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Space not occupied by the Company in its headquarters building is rented to other tenants under operating leases expiring through 2014. Future minimum rentals to be received under these leases total $6 and do not exceed $2 in any one year.
 
The Company is also party to certain purchase obligations, which are defined as purchase agreements that are enforceable and legally-binding and that specify all significant terms, including quantity, price and the approximate timing of the transaction. Examples of the Company’s purchase obligations include commitments for information technology and related services, advertising, raw material and contract packing purchases, utility agreements, capital expenditure agreements, software acquisition and license commitments, and service contracts. At June 30, 2007, the Company’s purchase obligations, including the services related to the ITS Agreement, totaled $253, $97, $55, $47, $44 and $44 for fiscal years 2008 through 2012, and thereafter, respectively.

NOTE 18.  	OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET	
 
The major components of other (income) expense, net for the fiscal years ended June 30 were:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Henkel Iberica:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Gain on exchange	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	(20	)	
Equity in earnings	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(5	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(25	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Interest income	 	 	(8	)	 	 	(10	)	 	 	(10	)	
Foreign exchange losses (gains), net	 	 	4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(8	)	
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	 	 	(8	)	 	 	(7	)	 	 	(5	)	
Low-income housing partnership losses (Note 8)	 	 	4	 	 	 	15	 	 	 	16	 	
Amortization of trademarks and other intangible assets	 	 	5	 	 	 	5	 	 	 	4	 	
Other	 	 	1	 	 	 	(5	)	 	 	5	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(2	)	 	 	2	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total other income, net	 	$	(2	)	 	$	(2	)	 	$	(23	)	

 
The Company recorded an $11 benefit ($8 after-tax or $0.04 per diluted share) to other (income) expense, net in fiscal year 2005 to recognize certain currency transaction gains, which accumulated over a four-year period in a foreign subsidiary and are included in foreign exchange losses (gains), net, above. The Company does not believe the foreign currency transaction gains are material to the periods in which they should have been reflected or were and therefore recorded the entire benefit in fiscal year 2005.

47

 

		
NOTE 18.  	OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET (Continued)	
 
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2005, the Company recorded a $13 pretax charge ($9 after-tax or $0.05 per diluted share) in other (income) expense, net to recognize certain partnership operating losses realized in prior fiscal years, the aggregate charge accumulated over the approximate 14-year period during which the Company invested in the partnerships. The Company does not believe these losses are material to the periods in which they should have been reflected or were reflected and, therefore, recorded the entire charge in the third quarter of fiscal year 2005.

NOTE 19.  	INCOME TAXES	
 
The provision for income taxes on continuing operations, by tax jurisdiction, consisted of the following for the fiscal years ended June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Current	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Federal	 	$	196	 	 	$	178	 	 	$	209	 	
State	 	 	29	 	 	 	20	 	 	 	24	 	
Foreign	 	 	37	 	 	 	40	 	 	 	26	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total current	 	 	262	 	 	 	238	 	 	 	259	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Deferred	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Federal	 	 	(14	)	 	 	(15	)	 	 	(62	)	
Federal — American Jobs Creation Act	 	 	—	 	 	 	(8	)	 	 	12	 	
State	 	 	—	 	 	 	(1	)	 	 	(5	)	
Foreign	 	 	(1	)	 	 	(4	)	 	 	8	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total deferred	 	 	(15	)	 	 	(28	)	 	 	(47	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	247	 	 	$	210	 	 	$	212	 	

 
The components of earnings from continuing operations before income taxes, by tax jurisdiction, were as follows for the fiscal years ended June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
United States	 	$	508	 	 	$	516	 	 	$	587	 	
Foreign	 	 	235	 	 	 	137	 	 	 	142	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	$	743	 	 	$	653	 	 	$	729	 	

 
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate on continuing operations follows for the fiscal years ended June 30:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Statutory federal tax rate	 	 	35.0	%	 	 	35.0	%	 	 	35.0	%	
State taxes (net of federal tax benefits)	 	 	2.6	 	 	 	1.4	 	 	 	1.7	 	
Tax differential on foreign earnings	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	(2.4	)	 	 	(0.6	)	
Net adjustment of prior year federal and state tax accruals	 	 	(1.6	)	 	 	1.9	 	 	 	(2.9	)	
Change in valuation allowance	 	 	(1.3	)	 	 	(0.6	)	 	 	(1.4	)	
Low-income housing tax credits	 	 	(0.7	)	 	 	(1.4	)	 	 	(0.9	)	
Other differences	 	 	(0.1	)	 	 	(1.8	)	 	 	(1.8	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Effective tax rate	 	 	33.2	%	 	 	32.1	%	 	 	29.1	%	

 
Applicable U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes have not been provided on approximately $57 of undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries at June 30, 2007, since these earnings are considered indefinitely

48

 

		
NOTE 19.  	INCOME TAXES (Continued)	
 
reinvested. The net federal income tax liability that would arise if these earnings were not indefinitely reinvested is approximately $13. Applicable U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes are provided on these earnings in the periods in which they are repatriated.
 
During fiscal year 2006, the Company repatriated approximately $265 of cash previously held in foreign entities. Of this amount, $111 represented dividends paid under the terms of the American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) that the Company reinvested in certain qualified activities. All entities whose earnings had been designated as indefinitely reinvested prior to remitting qualified dividends under the terms of the AJCA have reverted back to indefinite reinvestment status as of June 30, 2006.
 
With respect to the Company’s stock option plans, realized tax benefits in excess of tax benefits recognized in net earnings are recorded as increases to additional paid-in capital. Excess tax benefits of approximately $16, $17 and $22 were realized and recorded to additional paid-in capital for the fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, previously recognized tax benefits of $5, relating to the cumulative charge described at Note 16, were reclassified from additional paid-in capital to income tax expense during the fiscal year 2006.
 
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30 are shown below:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Deferred tax assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Compensation and benefit programs	 	$	122	 	 	$	88	 	
Basis difference related to Venture Agreement	 	 	30	 	 	 	30	 	
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards	 	 	17	 	 	 	20	 	
Inventory costs	 	 	13	 	 	 	10	 	
Other	 	 	24	 	 	 	23	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Subtotal	 	 	206	 	 	 	171	 	
Valuation allowance	 	 	(22	)	 	 	(26	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total deferred tax assets	 	 	184	 	 	 	145	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Deferred tax liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Fixed and intangible assets	 	 	(148	)	 	 	(168	)	
Low-income housing partnerships	 	 	(21	)	 	 	(24	)	
Accruals and reserves	 	 	(19	)	 	 	(14	)	
Unremitted foreign earnings	 	 	(15	)	 	 	(11	)	
Other	 	 	(26	)	 	 	(24	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total deferred tax liabilities	 	 	(229	)	 	 	(241	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net deferred tax liabilities	 	$	(45	)	 	$	(96	)	

 
The net deferred tax assets and liabilities included in the consolidated balance sheet at June 30 were as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Current deferred tax assets	 	$	31	 	 	$	24	 	
Noncurrent deferred tax assets	 	 	14	 	 	 	9	 	
Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities	 	 	(90	)	 	 	(129	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net deferred tax liabilities	 	$	(45	)	 	$	(96	)	

49

 

		
NOTE 19.  	INCOME TAXES (Continued)	
 
The Company periodically reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability. A valuation allowance is established when the Company believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. Valuation allowances have been provided to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts considered recoverable. Details of the valuation allowance at June 30 were as follows:

 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Valuation allowance at beginning of year	 	$	(26	)	 	$	(33	)	
Decrease in foreign net operating loss carryforward	 	 	4	 	 	 	7	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Valuation allowance at end of year	 	$	(22	)	 	$	(26	)	

 
At June 30, 2007, the Company had federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $7 with an expiration date in fiscal year 2016. Tax benefits from foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $8 have expiration dates between fiscal years 2009 and 2017. Tax benefits from foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $2 may be carried forward indefinitely.
 
At June 30, 2006, the Company had federal foreign tax credit carryforwards of $5 with an expiration date in fiscal year 2016. In addition, the Company had income tax credit carryforwards in foreign jurisdictions of $1 with an expiration date in fiscal year 2008. Tax benefits from foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $11 have expiration dates between fiscal years 2007 and 2016. Tax benefits from foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $3 may be carried forward indefinitely.
 
In June 2007, the Company reached agreement with the IRS resolving all remaining tax issues originally arising in the period from 1997 through 2000. As a result of the settlement agreement, the Company paid $11 in federal taxes and interest for the years 1997 through 2000 in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007. The Company had previously accrued for these contingencies.
 
In April 2005, the Company reached an agreement with the IRS resolving certain tax issues originally arising in the period from 1997 through 2000. As a result of the settlement agreement, the Company paid $94 (excluding $6 of tax benefits) in fiscal year 2005 and $151 (excluding $13 of tax benefits) in fiscal year 2006, respectively. The Company had previously accrued for this contingency and released approximately $23 in tax accruals related to this matter in fiscal year 2005.
 
In 2006, the IRS completed audits of the Company’s income tax returns through fiscal year 2002, and additional tax matters related to these audits are being reviewed at the IRS appeals level.
 
In fiscal year 2008, the Company will adopt FIN 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 109 . See Note 1 for the anticipated impact of the adoption.

50

 

		
NOTE 20.  	EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS	
 
The Company adopted SFAS No. 158 at the end of fiscal year 2007. The Company applied the modified prospective transition method and prior periods were not restated. The incremental effect of applying SFAS No. 158 in the balance sheet as of June 30, 2007, was as follows:

 	 	Prior to	 	 	Effect of	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Adoption of	 	 	Adopting	 	 	As Reported	 	
 	 	SFAS No. 158	 	 	SFAS No. 158	 	 	June 30, 2007	 	
 		
Retirement income assets	 	$	106	 	 	$	(67	)	 	$	39	 	
Deferred tax assets	 	 	3	 	 	 	24	 	 	 	27	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	$	109	 	 	$	(43	)	 	$	66	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Retirement income liabilities	 	 	(104	)	 	 	(9	)	 	 	(113	)	
Retirement health care liabilities	 	 	(83	)	 	 	13	 	 	 	(70	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	$	(187	)	 	$	4	 	 	$	(183	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	 	$	5	 	 	$	39	 	 	$	44	 	

 
Items not yet recognized as a component of post retirement expense as of June 30, 2007, consisted of:

 	 	Retirement	 	 	Retirement	 	
 	 	Income	 	 	Health Care	 	
 		
Prior service benefit	 	$	—	 	 	$	(7	)	
Net actuarial loss/(gain)	 	 	84	 	 	 	(6	)	
Deferred income taxes	 	 	(32	)	 	 	5	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Accumulated other comprehensive loss/(income)	 	$	52	 	 	$	(8	)	

 
In fiscal year 2008, the Company expects to recognize, on a pretax basis, approximately $2 of the prior year service benefit and $7 of the net actuarial loss as a component of net periodic benefit cost.
 
retirement income plans
 
The Company has qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans that cover substantially all domestic employees and certain international employees. Benefits are based on either employee years of service and compensation or a stated dollar amount per years of service. The Company is the sole contributor to the plans in amounts deemed necessary to provide benefits and to the extent deductible for federal income tax purposes. Assets of the plans consist primarily of marketable equity and debt security investments. The Company made contributions of $10, $10 and zero to its domestic qualified retirement income plans in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company has also contributed zero, zero and $1 to its foreign retirement income plans for fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute amounts sufficient to meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee benefit tax laws plus additional amounts as the Company may determine to be appropriate.
 
retirement health care
 
The Company provides certain health care benefits for employees who meet age, participation and length of service requirements at retirement. The plans pay stated percentages of covered expenses after annual deductibles have been met. Benefits paid take into consideration payments by Medicare. The plans are funded as claims are paid, and the Company has the right to modify or terminate certain of these plans.
 
The assumed health care cost trend rate used in measuring the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation (APBO) was 10% for medical and 12% for prescription drugs for fiscal year 2007. These rates have been assumed to gradually decrease by 1% for each year until an assumed ultimate trend of 5% is reached in 2012 for medical and 2014 for prescription drugs. The healthcare cost trend rate assumption has an effect on the amounts reported. The effect of a one percentage point increase or decrease in the assumed healthcare cost trend rate on the total service and interest cost components and the postretirement benefit obligation was approximately $1 at June 30, 2007, 2006 and 2005.

51

 

		
NOTE 20.  	EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)	
 
Summarized information for the Company’s retirement income and healthcare plans at and for the fiscal year ended June 30:

 	 	Retirement Income	 	 	Retirement Health Care	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Change in benefit obligations:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	 	$	453	 	 	$	530	 	 	$	77	 	 	$	84	 	
Service cost	 	 	11	 	 	 	12	 	 	 	2	 	 	 	2	 	
Interest cost	 	 	28	 	 	 	25	 	 	 	4	 	 	 	4	 	
Employee contributions to deferred compensation plans	 	 	5	 	 	 	5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Actuarial loss (gain)	 	 	7	 	 	 	(84	)	 	 	(9	)	 	 	(9	)	
Translation adjustment	 	 	1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Benefits paid	 	 	(39	)	 	 	(35	)	 	 	(4	)	 	 	(4	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Benefit obligation at end of year	 	 	466	 	 	 	453	 	 	 	70	 	 	 	77	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Change in plan assets:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Fair value of assets at beginning of year	 	 	355	 	 	 	339	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Actual return on plan assets	 	 	56	 	 	 	30	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Employer contributions to qualified and nonqualified plans	 	 	19	 	 	 	20	 	 	 	4	 	 	 	4	 	
Translation adjustment	 	 	1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Benefits paid	 	 	(39	)	 	 	(35	)	 	 	(4	)	 	 	(4	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Fair value of plan assets at end of year	 	 	392	 	 	 	354	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Unfunded status	 	 	(74	)	 	 	(99	)	 	 	(70	)	 	 	(77	)	
Unrecognized prior service cost	 	 	—	 	 	 	(2	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(9	)	
Unrecognized loss	 	 	—	 	 	 	118	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	3	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Prepaid (accrued) benefit cost	 	$	(74	)	 	$	17	 	 	$	(70	)	 	$	(83	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Amount recognized in the balance sheets consists of:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Pension benefit assets	 	$	39	 	 	$	106	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	
Current accrued benefit liability	 	 	(10	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(5	)	 	 	—	 	
Non-current accrued benefit liability	 	 	(103	)	 	 	(99	)	 	 	(65	)	 	 	(83	)	
Accumulated other comprehensive net losses, before deferred tax benefits	 	 	—	 	 	 	10	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net amount recognized	 	$	(74	)	 	$	17	 	 	$	(70	)	 	$	(83	)	

 
The projected benefit obligation (PBO), accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) and fair value of plan assets for those pension plans with an ABO in excess of plan assets were $55, $48, and zero, respectively at June 30, 2007 and $51, $47, and zero, respectively, at June 30, 2006. The PBO, ABO and fair value of plan assets for other retirement income plans, including the nonqualified deferred compensation plans, with an ABO in excess of plan assets were $58, $58, and zero, respectively, at June 30, 2007 and $51, $51, and zero, respectively, at June 30, 2006. The ABO for pension plans was $397 and $391 at June 30, 2007 and 2006. The ABO for all retirement income plans increased by $13 in fiscal year 2007. The Company uses a June 30 measurement date.
 
At June 30, 2006, the Company recorded additional minimum pension liabilities of $10 which was included in accumulated other comprehensive net losses, with an offset to other liabilities. The additional minimum liability was required when the ABO is greater than the fair market value of plan assets and represents the excess of the ABO over the accrued benefit cost. The additional minimum liability is no longer required under SFAS No. 158. At

52

 

		
NOTE 20.  	EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)	
 
June 30, 2006, the Company recorded deferred taxes of $4 associated with the additional minimum liabilities with an offset to accumulated other comprehensive net losses.
 
The net retirement income and healthcare plans costs for the fiscal year ended June 30 include the following components:

 	 	 	 	 	Retirement	 	
 	 	Retirement Income	 	 	Health Care	 	
 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	 	2005	 	
 		
Components of net periodic benefit cost	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Service cost	 	$	11	 	 	$	12	 	 	$	13	 	 	$	2	 	 	$	2	 	 	$	2	 	
Interest cost	 	 	28	 	 	 	25	 	 	 	26	 	 	 	4	 	 	 	4	 	 	 	5	 	
Expected return on plan assets	 	 	(27	)	 	 	(27	)	 	 	(28	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
Amortization of unrecognized items	 	 	9	 	 	 	14	 	 	 	8	 	 	 	(2	)	 	 	(1	)	 	 	(2	)	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total net periodic benefit cost	 	$	21	 	 	$	24	 	 	$	19	 	 	$	4	 	 	$	5	 	 	$	5	 	

 
The target allocations and weighted average asset allocations of the investment portfolio for the Company’s domestic qualified retirement income plan at June 30 are:

 	 	 	 	 	% of Plan	 	
 	 	 	 	 	Assets	 	
 	 	% Target	 	 	at June 30	 	
 	 	Allocation	 	 	2007	 	 	2006	 	
 		
Asset Category	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
U.S. equity	 	 	50	%	 	 	49	%	 	 	57	%	
International equity	 	 	20	 	 	 	20	 	 	 	19	 	
Fixed income	 	 	25	 	 	 	24	 	 	 	24	 	
Other	 	 	5	 	 	 	7	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total	 	 	100	%	 	 	100	%	 	 	100	%	

 
The expected long-term rate of return assumption is based on an analysis of historical experience of the portfolio and the summation of prospective returns for each asset class in proportion to the fund’s current asset allocation. The discount rate assumption is determined annually based on the Moody’s Aa-rated long-term bond yield index, which approximate the timing and cash outflows of the Company’s defined benefit payments. The target asset allocation was determined based on the risk tolerance characteristics of the plan and, at times, may be adjusted to achieve the Company’s overall investment objective and to minimize any concentration of investment risk. The Company’s objective is to invest plan assets in a manner that will generate resources to pay current and projected plan obligations over the life of the domestic qualified retirement income plan.
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the actuarial present value of benefit obligations at June 30 are as follows:

 	 	Retirement Income	 	Retirement Health Care	
 	 	2007	 	2006	 	2007	 	2006	
 		
Benefit Obligation	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Discount rate	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Range	 	5.50% to 6.25%	 	5.50% to 6.25%	 	5.50% to 6.25%	 	5.75% to 6.25%	
Weighted average	 	6.22%	 	6.23%	 	6.19%	 	6.22%	
Rate of compensation increase	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Range	 	3.50% to 5.50%	 	3.50% to 5.50%	 	n/a	 	n/a	
Weighted average	 	4.18%	 	4.17%	 	n/a	 	n/a	

53

 

		
NOTE 20.  	EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)	
 
Weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit expenses (income) for the fiscal year ended June 30, are as follows:

 	 	Retirement Income	
 	 	2007	 	2006	 	2005	
 		
Net periodic expense (income)	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Discount rate	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Range	 	5.50% to 6.25%	 	5.00% to 5.25%	 	5.50% to 6.50%	
Weighted average	 	6.23%	 	5.01%	 	6.49%	
Rate of compensation increase	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Range	 	3.50% to 5.50%	 	3.50% to 5.50%	 	3.50% to 5.50%	
Weighted average	 	4.17%	 	4.17%	 	4.17%	
Expected return on plan assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Range	 	6.50% to 8.25%	 	6.50% to 8.25%	 	6.50% to 8.25%	
Weighted average	 	8.17%	 	8.18%	 	8.18%	

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Retirement Health Care	
 	 	2007	 	2006	 	2005	
 		
Net periodic expense (income)	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Discount rate	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Range	 	5.75% to 6.25%	 	5.00% to 5.25%	 	6.25% to 6.50%	
Weighted average	 	6.22%	 	5.01%	 	6.49%	

Expected benefit payments for the Company’s pension and other postretirement plans are as follows:

 	 	Income	 	 	Health Care	 	
 		
2008	 	$	33	 	 	$	5	 	
2009	 	 	32	 	 	 	5	 	
2010	 	 	33	 	 	 	6	 	
2011	 	 	34	 	 	 	6	 	
2012	 	 	34	 	 	 	6	 	
Fiscal years 2013 — 2017	 	 	177	 	 	 	29	 	

Expected benefit payments are based on the same assumptions used to measure the benefit obligations and include estimated future employee service.
 
Defined Contribution Plans
 
The Company has defined contribution plans for most of its domestic employees. The cost of those plans is based on the Company’s profitability and level of participants’ deferrals qualifying for match. The plans include The Clorox Company 401(k) Plan, which has two components, a 401(k) component and a profit sharing component. Employee contributions made to the 401(k) component are partially matched with Company contributions. Company contributions to the profit sharing component above 3% of employee eligible earnings are discretionary and are based on Company performance targets including sales growth, earnings per share and certain other metrics. The aggregate cost of the defined contribution plans was $26, $25 and $22 in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively, including $21, $21 and $18, respectively, of discretionary contributions. The Company also has defined contribution plans for certain of its international employees. The aggregate cost of these foreign plans was $3, $2 and $2 in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

54

 

		
NOTE 21.  	SEGMENT REPORTING	
 
Information regarding the Company’s reportable segments is shown below. Each segment is individually managed with separate reportable results that are reviewed regularly by the chief operating decision makers. Intersegment sales are insignificant. The reportable segments include:

• 	Household Group — North America:  Includes U.S. laundry, cleaning, water-filtration, auto-care and professional products, and all products marketed in Canada.	
 		
• 	Specialty Group:  Includes the plastic bags, wraps and containers businesses, charcoal, cat litter and food products marketed in the United States.	
 		
• 	International:  Includes operations outside the United States and Canada.	
 
Corporate includes certain nonallocated administrative costs, amortization of trademarks and other intangible assets, interest income, interest expense, foreign exchange gains and losses, and other nonoperating income and expense. Corporate assets include cash and cash equivalents, the Company’s headquarters and research and development facilities, information systems hardware and software, pension balances, and other investments.

 	 	 	 	Household	 	Specialty	 	 	 	 	 	Total	
 	 	Fiscal Year	 	Group	 	Group	 	International	 	Corporate	 	Company	
 		
Net sales	 	 	2007	 	 	$	2,140	 	 	$	1,990	 	 	$	717	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	4,847	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	2,113	 	 	 	1,892	 	 	 	639	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4,644	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	2,013	 	 	 	1,788	 	 	 	587	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4,388	 	
Earnings (losses) from continuing operations before income taxes	 	 	2007	 	 	 	671	 	 	 	534	 	 	 	141	 	 	 	(603	)	 	 	743	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	671	 	 	 	460	 	 	 	129	 	 	 	(607	)	 	 	653	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	629	 	 	 	435	 	 	 	123	 	 	 	(458	)	 	 	729	 	
Equity in earnings of affiliates	 	 	2007	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	8	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	8	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	7	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	7	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	13	 	 	 	(1	)	 	 	12	 	
Identifiable assets	 	 	2007	 	 	 	1,449	 	 	 	892	 	 	 	716	 	 	 	609	 	 	 	3,666	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	1,356	 	 	 	893	 	 	 	581	 	 	 	786	 	 	 	3,616	 	
Capital expenditures	 	 	2007	 	 	 	36	 	 	 	70	 	 	 	10	 	 	 	31	 	 	 	147	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	34	 	 	 	81	 	 	 	14	 	 	 	51	 	 	 	180	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	39	 	 	 	61	 	 	 	9	 	 	 	42	 	 	 	151	 	
Depreciation and amortization	 	 	2007	 	 	 	42	 	 	 	68	 	 	 	14	 	 	 	68	 	 	 	192	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	43	 	 	 	63	 	 	 	16	 	 	 	66	 	 	 	188	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	41	 	 	 	64	 	 	 	10	 	 	 	68	 	 	 	183	 	
Significant non-cash charges included in earnings from continuing operations before income taxes:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Asset impairment costs	 	 	2007	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	26	 	 	 	3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	29	 	
Share-based compensation(1)	 	 	2007	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	49	 	 	 	49	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	77	 	 	 	77	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	11	 	 	 	11	 	

 
			
(1)		Included in fiscal year 2006 were pretax charges of $25 related to non-cash historical stock option compensation expense.	
 
Included in the fiscal year 2006 Corporate segment losses from continuing operations before income taxes was a charge of $11 ($7 after-tax) related to the retirement of the former chairman and CEO from his positions. The after-tax charge includes $4 related to expected accelerated vesting of certain non-cash stock compensation and $3 in

55

 

		
NOTE 21.  	SEGMENT REPORTING (Continued)	
 
connection with expected salary continuation in accordance with the terms of the Company’s stock compensation and long-term disability plans.
 
The $20 gain recorded in fiscal year 2005 on the exchange of Henkel Iberica was included in the Corporate segment.
 
Net sales to the Company’s largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, were 26% of consolidated net sales in fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, and occurred primarily within the Household Group — North America and Specialty Group segments. No other customers exceeded 10% of consolidated net sales in any year. During fiscal years 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company’s five largest customers accounted for 42%, 41% and 40% of its net sales, respectively.
 
Sales of Glad ® trash bags represented approximately 14%, 14% and 12%, respectively, of total consolidated net sales in fiscal year 2007, 2006 and 2005. Sales of Clorox ® liquid bleach represented approximately 12%, 13% and 11%, respectively, of total consolidated net sales in fiscal year 2007, 2006 and 2005. No other product line exceeded 10% of total consolidated net sales in either fiscal year 2007, 2006 or 2005.
 
Net sales and long-lived assets by geographic area at and for the fiscal years ended June 30 were as follows:

 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Total	
 	 	Fiscal Year	 	United States	 	Foreign	 	Company	
 		
Net sales	 	 	2007	 	 	$	3,977	 	 	$	870	 	 	$	4,847	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	3,878	 	 	 	766	 	 	 	4,644	 	
 	 	 	2005	 	 	 	3,692	 	 	 	696	 	 	 	4,388	 	
Long-lived assets	 	 	2007	 	 	 	847	 	 	 	129	 	 	 	976	 	
 	 	 	2006	 	 	 	887	 	 	 	117	 	 	 	1,004	 	

		
NOTE 22.  	GUARANTEES	
 
In conjunction with divestitures and other transactions, the Company may provide indemnifications relating to the enforceability of trademarks, pre-existing legal, tax, environmental and employee liabilities, as well as provisions for product returns and other items. The Company has indemnification agreements in effect that specify a maximum possible indemnification exposure. The Company’s aggregate maximum exposure from these agreements is $291, which consists primarily of an indemnity of up to $250 made to Henkel in connection with the Share Exchange Agreement, subject to a minimum threshold of $12 before any payments would be made. The general representations and warranties made by the Company in connection with the Henkel Share Exchange Agreement were made to guarantee statements of fact at the time of the transaction closing and pertain to environmental, legal and other matters.
 
In addition to the indemnifications related to the general representations and warranties, the Company entered into an agreement with Henkel regarding certain tax matters. The Company made certain representations of fact as of the closing date of the exchange transaction and certain representations and warranties regarding future performance designed to preserve the tax-free status of the exchange transaction. In general, the Company agreed to be responsible for Henkel’s taxes on the transaction if the Company’s actions result in a breach of the representations and warranties in a manner that causes the share-exchange to fail to qualify for tax-free treatment. Henkel has agreed to similar obligations. The Company is unable to estimate the amount of maximum potential liability relating to the tax indemnification as the agreement does not specify a maximum amount, and the Company does not have the information that would be required to calculate this exposure. The Company does note, however, that the potential tax exposure, if any, could be very significant as the Company believes Henkel’s tax basis in the shares exchanged is low, and the value of the subsidiary stock transferred to Henkel in the exchange transaction was approximately $2,800. Although the agreement does not specify an indemnification term, any exposure under the agreement would be limited to taxes assessed prior to the expiration of the statute of limitations period for assessing taxes on the share exchange transaction.

56

 

		
NOTE 22.  	GUARANTEES (Continued)	
 
The Company is a party to letters of credit of $24, primarily related to one of its insurance carriers.
 
The Company has not recorded any liabilities on any of the aforementioned guarantees at June 30, 2007.

NOTE 23.  	UNAUDITED QUARTERLY DATA	

 	 	Quarters Ended	 	
 	 	September 30	 	 	December 31	 	 	March 31	 	 	June 30	 	 	Total Year	 	
 		
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2007	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net sales	 	$	1,161	 	 	$	1,101	 	 	$	1,241	 	 	$	1,344	 	 	$	4,847	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cost of products sold	 	$	663	 	 	$	639	 	 	$	704	 	 	$	750	 	 	$	2,756	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings from continuing operations	 	$	112	 	 	$	91	 	 	$	129	 	 	$	164	 	 	$	496	 	
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax	 	 	—	 	 	 	5	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	5	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	112	 	 	$	96	 	 	$	129	 	 	$	164	 	 	$	501	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Per common share:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.74	 	 	$	0.60	 	 	$	0.85	 	 	$	1.08	 	 	$	3.28	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.03	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.74	 	 	$	0.63	 	 	$	0.85	 	 	$	1.08	 	 	$	3.31	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.73	 	 	$	0.59	 	 	$	0.84	 	 	$	1.07	 	 	$	3.23	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.03	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.03	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.73	 	 	$	0.62	 	 	$	0.84	 	 	$	1.07	 	 	$	3.26	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends per common share	 	$	0.29	 	 	$	0.31	 	 	$	0.31	 	 	$	0.40	 	 	$	1.31	 	
Market price (NYSE)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
High	 	$	64.16	 	 	$	66.00	 	 	$	67.50	 	 	$	69.36	 	 	$	69.36	 	
Low	 	 	56.17	 	 	 	62.83	 	 	 	60.96	 	 	 	61.38	 	 	 	56.17	 	
Year-end	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	62.10	 	

57

 

		
NOTE 23.  	UNAUDITED QUARTERLY DATA (Continued)	

 	 	Quarters Ended	 	
 	 	September 30	 	 	December 31	 	 	March 31	 	 	June 30	 	 	Total Year	 	
 		
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2006	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net sales	 	$	1,104	 	 	$	1,064	 	 	$	1,157	 	 	$	1,319	 	 	$	4,644	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Cost of products sold	 	$	638	 	 	$	628	 	 	$	677	 	 	$	742	 	 	$	2,685	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings from continuing operations(1)	 	$	108	 	 	$	83	 	 	$	110	 	 	$	142	 	 	$	443	 	
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax	 	 	1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	109	 	 	$	83	 	 	$	110	 	 	$	142	 	 	$	444	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Per common share:	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.71	 	 	$	0.56	 	 	$	0.73	 	 	$	0.94	 	 	$	2.94	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.01	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.72	 	 	$	0.56	 	 	$	0.73	 	 	$	0.94	 	 	$	2.95	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Diluted	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	$	0.70	 	 	$	0.55	 	 	$	0.72	 	 	$	0.92	 	 	$	2.89	 	
Discontinued operations	 	 	0.01	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	0.01	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	0.71	 	 	$	0.55	 	 	$	0.72	 	 	$	0.92	 	 	$	2.90	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Dividends per common share	 	$	0.28	 	 	$	0.29	 	 	$	0.29	 	 	$	0.29	 	 	$	1.15	 	
Market price (NYSE)	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
High	 	$	58.11	 	 	$	57.96	 	 	$	63.53	 	 	$	65.61	 	 	$	65.61	 	
Low	 	 	54.30	 	 	 	52.50	 	 	 	56.38	 	 	 	58.54	 	 	 	52.50	 	
Year-end	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	60.97	 	

 
			
(1)		In the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006, the Company recorded a pretax cumulative charge of $25 ($16 after-tax) resulting from non-cash charges associated with historical stock option compensation expense relating to prior periods dating back to the third quarter of fiscal 1996. The Company does not believe these expenses are material to the periods in which they should have been reflected and therefore recorded the entire charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2006.	

NOTE 24.  	SUBSEQUENT EVENT	
 
On August 10, 2007, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase (ASR) program with two investment banks. Under the ASR program, the Company repurchased $750 of its shares of common stock from the investment banks for an initial per share amount of $59.59, subject to adjustment. The Company financed the purchase of its shares with cash and commercial paper. Final settlement of the ASR program is scheduled to take place by January 2008. The final number of shares the Company is repurchasing under the terms of the agreement and the timing of the final settlement will depend on prevailing market conditions, the final discounted volume weighted average share price over the term of the ASR program and any other customary adjustments. As part of the final settlement, the Company may receive additional shares from the investment banks or may be required to pay to investment banks a price adjustment. The price adjustment may be made in common stock or cash, at the Company’s election. As this ASR occurred subsequent to June 30, 2007, it is not reflected in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements.
58

 

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
 
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s financial statements for external reporting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
Management evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework . Management, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting at June 30, 2007 and concluded that it is effective.
 
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young, LLP has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007.

59

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of The Clorox Company
 
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The Clorox Company as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2007. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule in Exhibit 99.2. These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of The Clorox Company at June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
 
As discussed in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements, on June 30, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, and changed its method of recognizing the funded status of its defined benefit postretirement plans. Also, effective July 1, 2005, the Company changed its method for accounting for share-based compensation to conform with SFAS No. 123-R, Share-Based Payment.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of The Clorox Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated August 23, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
San Francisco, California
August 23, 2007

60

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of The Clorox Company
 
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that The Clorox Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). The Clorox Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
 
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
 
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
In our opinion, management’s assessment that The Clorox Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, The Clorox Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2007, based on the COSO criteria.
 
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of The Clorox Company as of June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2007, and our report dated August 23, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/  Ernst & Young LLP
 
San Francisco, California
August 23, 2007

61

 

FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL SUMMARY
The Clorox Company

Years Ended June 30	 	2007(2)	 	 	2006(1)	 	 	2005(2)	 	 	2004	 	 	2003(2)	 	

Dollars in millions, except per share data	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
OPERATIONS	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net sales	 	$	4,847	 	 	$	4,644	 	 	$	4,388	 	 	$	4,162	 	 	$	3,986	 	
Gross profit	 	 	2,091	 	 	 	1,959	 	 	 	1,895	 	 	 	1,831	 	 	 	1,815	 	
Earnings from continuing operations	 	 	496	 	 	 	443	 	 	 	517	 	 	 	490	 	 	 	461	 	
Earnings from discontinued operations, net of tax	 	 	5	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	579	 	 	 	59	 	 	 	32	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Net earnings	 	$	501	 	 	$	444	 	 	$	1,096	 	 	$	549	 	 	$	493	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
COMMON STOCK	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Earnings per common share	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Continuing operations	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Basic	 	$	3.28	 	 	$	2.94	 	 	$	2.92	 	 	$	2.31	 	 	$	2.11	 	
Diluted	 	 	3.23	 	 	 	2.89	 	 	 	2.88	 	 	 	2.28	 	 	 	2.08	 	
Dividends declared per common share	 	$	1.31	 	 	$	1.15	 	 	$	1.11	 	 	$	1.35	 	 	$	0.88	 	
OTHER DATA	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Total assets	 	$	3,666	 	 	$	3,616	 	 	$	3,617	 	 	$	3,834	 	 	$	3,652	 	
Long-term debt	 	 	1,462	 	 	 	1,966	 	 	 	2,122	 	 	 	475	 	 	 	495	 	

 
			
(1)		In fiscal year 2006, the Company began recording compensation expense associated with stock options and other forms of equity compensation in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123-R, Share-Based Payment , as interpreted by Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107.	
 		
(2)		In fiscal year 2005, the Company completed the exchange of its ownership interest in a subsidiary for Henkel KGaA’s interest in Clorox common stock. In fiscal year 2003, the Company announced its intent to sell its business in Brazil, closed its offices in Brazil, and sold nearly all of the remaining assets of this business; in fiscal year 2007, the Company sold certain assets remaining from its discontinued operation in Brazil.	

62

Exhibit 99.2
 
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES ($MILLION)

Column A	 	Column B	 	 	Column C	 	 	Column D	 	 	Column E	 	
 	 	 	 	 	Additions	 	 	Deductions	 	 	 	 	
 	 	Balance at	 	 	Charged to	 	 	Charged	 	 	Credited to	 	 	Credited	 	 	Balance at	 	
 	 	Beginning	 	 	Costs and	 	 	to Other	 	 	Costs and	 	 	to Other	 	 	End	 	
Description	 	of Period	 	 	Expenses	 	 	Accounts	 	 	Expenses	 	 	Accounts	 	 	of Period	 	
 		
Allowance for doubtful accounts	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Year ended June 30, 2007	 	$	(5	)	 	$	(2	)	 	$	—	 	 	$	—	 	 	$	2	 	 	$	(5	)	
Year ended June 30, 2006	 	 	(5	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(5	)	
Year ended June 30, 2005	 	 	(8	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	2	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	(5	)	
Allowance for inventory obsolescence	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Year ended June 30, 2007	 	 	(4	)	 	 	(10	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	5	 	 	 	(9	)	
Year ended June 30, 2006	 	 	(6	)	 	 	(6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	8	 	 	 	(4	)	
Year ended June 30, 2005	 	 	(4	)	 	 	(16	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	14	 	 	 	(6	)	
LIFO allowance	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Year ended June 30, 2007	 	 	(14	)	 	 	(7	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	3	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(18	)	
Year ended June 30, 2006	 	 	(9	)	 	 	(6	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	1	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(14	)	
Year ended June 30, 2005	 	 	(9	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(9	)	
Valuation allowance on deferred tax assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Year ended June 30, 2007	 	 	(26	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(22	)	
Year ended June 30, 2006	 	 	(33	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	4	 	 	 	3	 	 	 	(26	)	
Year ended June 30, 2005	 	 	(39	)	 	 	—	 	 	 	(4	)	 	 	10	 	 	 	—	 	 	 	(33	)	

  

Exhibit 99.3
 
THE CLOROX COMPANY
 
RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL

Dollars in millions	 	FY07	 	 	FY06	 	 	FY05	 	 	FY04	 	 	FY03	 	
 		
Gross profit	 	$	2,091	 	 	$	1,959	 	 	$	1,895	 	 	$	1,831	 	 	$	1,815	 	
Selling and administrative expenses	 	 	642	 	 	 	631	 	 	 	551	 	 	 	543	 	 	 	523	 	
Advertising costs	 	 	474	 	 	 	450	 	 	 	435	 	 	 	420	 	 	 	446	 	
Research and development costs	 	 	108	 	 	 	99	 	 	 	88	 	 	 	84	 	 	 	75	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Adjusted operating profit	 	 	867	 	 	 	779	 	 	 	821	 	 	 	784	 	 	 	771	 	
Other charges added back to adjusted operating profit(1)	 	 	23	 	 	 	9	 	 	 	15	 	 	 	8	 	 	 	4	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
Subtotal	 	 	890	 	 	 	788	 	 	 	836	 	 	 	792	 	 	 	775	 	
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	
After tax	 	 	595	 	 	 	529	 	 	 	543	 	 	 	516	 	 	 	508	 	
Average invested capital(2)	 	 	4,037	 	 	 	3,965	 	 	 	3,898	 	 	 	3,819	 	 	 	3,658	 	
Return on invested capital	 	 	14.7	%	 	 	13.3	%	 	 	13.9	%	 	 	13.5	%	 	 	13.9	%	
change versus prior year	 	 	+140 bps	 	 	 	-60 bps	 	 	 	+40 bps	 	 	 	-40 bps	 	 	 	+140 bps	 	

 
			
(1)		Other charges added to adjusted operating profit relate primarily to amortization expense and other smaller items included in gross profit. In addition, the current year included IT transition cost included in selling and administrative expenses.	
 		
(2)		Average invested capital includes total assets less current liabilities (excluding short-term debt) adjusted to add back cumulative historical goodwill amortization, impairment and other charges since fiscal year 1989.